Recent Posts

41

Engineering / Re: Interesting stuff about SpaceX Starship (hate the name)

« Last post by Nemesis on September 26, 2025, 11:46:03 am »

B.O. has moved the New Glenn EscaPADE launch up to October so maybe they will prove me wrong and launch again this year. 

Edit

Backed out to November now. 

Edit 2

Flight 2 - Sun • Nov 9th, 2025

The static fire has occurred so MAYBE it will happen on the current schedule.

Edit 3

Fri • Nov 7th, 2025  2:51 PM - 4:50 PM EST

Edit  Another change

Sun • Nov 9th, 2025  2:45 PM - 4:44 PM EST

42

Engineering / Re: Create your own private GPT

« Last post by Javora on September 24, 2025, 06:04:19 pm »

Contradiction of terms…. 

43

Engineering / Re: Create your own private GPT

« Last post by Panzergranate on September 22, 2025, 06:14:36 pm »

Just remember not to set it up to use FEMALE LOGIC!!

44

Engineering / Re: Interesting stuff about SpaceX Starship (hate the name)

« Last post by Nemesis on September 13, 2025, 12:46:57 pm »

IFT 11 currently set for Launch December, 2025

I'm guessing that is just a place holder and will be brought forward unless 1/ they are anticipating regulatory issues (most likely if they are planning orbital and bringing it down in the Gulf of Mexico) 2/ They aren't planning to use their remaining block 2 craft and will go with block 3 requiring them to finish the 2nd launch mount and fully validate it. 

Interesting whichever path they follow.

They have done the booster 15 (flown previously) static fire.  Starship 38 static fire still to be done.  Expectation now is October (barring the unforeseen).  I don't expect them to do a catch on booster 15 but I hope they do. 

Block 3 launches for IFT 12 (suborbital) and IFT 13 hopefully a return to Starbase (and maybe a catch) for Starship won't happen till next year as they need to finish pad B.  Refurbishing pad A for Block 3 launches will presumably begin soon after IFT 12 is completed.  Soon being maybe within weeks (or given the SpaceX pace maybe days).

EDIT
Starship 38 has had its static fire.  Typically if nothing went wrong this would mean a launch within 2 weeks.  Hopefully this is typical.

EDIT 2
IFT 11 Mon • Oct 6th, 2025  7:15 PM - 8:15 PM EDT

As expected that Dec date has been brought forward (the date of New Glenn has not also as expected) right on target.

EDIT 3
Mon • Oct 13th, 2025  7:15 PM - 8:15 PM EDT

EDIT 4

Success.

45

Engineering / Re: Create your own private GPT

« Last post by Javora on September 12, 2025, 05:12:30 pm »

There might be a privacy option but more research is needed:

https://lumo.proton.me/guest

46

Engineering / Re: Create your own private GPT

« Last post by Lono on September 12, 2025, 05:09:32 pm »

Turns out it is mostly useful for making an A.I. search of local documents that you wouldn't want to share remotely. Some people have made some Zork like word games or chatbots for themselves too.

I now only recommend using the latest online LLMs as they continue to grow in both ability, knowledge, and function. Just realize real privacy is not really a thing when you use them.

47

Engineering / Re: Interesting stuff about SpaceX Starship (hate the name)

« Last post by Nemesis on September 10, 2025, 06:27:15 am »

New Glenn has a date:

Projected To Launch Mon • Sep 29th, 2025

This specific launch was scheduled over a year ago (maybe more).  I wouldn't bet on it launching on time or even this year given its history.

Delayed to December, based on past such delays I wouldn't expect it to launch this year.

48

Engineering / Re: Interesting stuff about SpaceX Starship (hate the name)

« Last post by Nemesis on September 06, 2025, 02:42:09 pm »

IFT 11 is going to reuse booster 15 with Starship 38.


Falcon 9 has had the 30th flight for one booster.  They have also now launched and landed Falcon 9s over 500 times. 

49

Engineering / Re: Interesting stuff about SpaceX Starship (hate the name)

« Last post by Nemesis on August 30, 2025, 07:43:25 pm »

IFT 11 currently set for Launch December, 2025

I'm guessing that is just a place holder and will be brought forward unless 1/ they are anticipating regulatory issues (most likely if they are planning orbital and bringing it down in the Gulf of Mexico) 2/ They aren't planning to use their remaining block 2 craft and will go with block 3 requiring them to finish the 2nd launch mount and fully validate it. 

Interesting whichever path they follow.

50

Engineering / Re: Interesting stuff about SpaceX Starship (hate the name)

« Last post by Nemesis on August 27, 2025, 12:29:58 pm »

IFT 10 Success.  There was a explosion in the engine bay which didn't stop the landing.  The rear flaps both had burn throughs but continued to operate.  Simulated starlinks were deployed though one appeared to hit the door (or door frame).  The booster also did its simulated landing.