Dynaverse.net

Off Topic => Ten Forward => Topic started by: Taldren_Admin on October 14, 2003, 12:24:59 pm

Title: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Taldren_Admin on October 14, 2003, 12:24:59 pm
And we're off....
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 14, 2003, 12:31:39 pm
Quote:

And we're off....  




And that is news to whom?  

 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 14, 2003, 12:33:47 pm
Drat, if not for Farenheit, I would have had the last post in the second thread.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on October 14, 2003, 01:14:58 pm
Ok everyone post away.

Gotta get this thread above the old ones
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on October 14, 2003, 01:22:49 pm
Heh. It seems that we can only get so many posts before this version of the UBB stops the thread from working well.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 14, 2003, 01:59:59 pm
One of the last posts I made in Seti Thread II was a response from David Anderson - the power that be behind BOINC - to a note I sent him.

My original message was as follows:

Quote:

The ability of programs like SetiQueue to be a single point of contact for many Seti clients is important to maximum work unit production.  Many of the machines currently processing Seti work units do not have an internet connection, but connect to a single machine that does.

Remove the ability of SetiQueue to act as that single point of contact, and you also remove all of those non-internet connected machines from the pool.




His response:

 I think that an HTTP proxy would serve the same purpose.
I added some text to the "transition" page to this effect.
-- David  


The transition page of which he speaks is here:

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/boinc_transition_plan.html

and his address (should anyone have an issue with his response) is:

davea@ssl.berkeley.edu
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 14, 2003, 02:46:32 pm
Having said that non-Internet connected machines will not have access, I'm through after SETI I.  Most of my machines are behind a fairly ugly milnet firewall and have no access individually.  SETI is one of those banned Internet programs.  SETI can run but can not receive/ send W/Us.

Oh well, I guess I will have to be Lord God for Life for SETI I for Taldren.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 14, 2003, 03:04:17 pm
Like I said - if you have an issue with it, send Mr. Anderson a note explaining what the issue is and why.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: digi on October 14, 2003, 06:01:06 pm
Although I only use 3 machines, 2 of these will be affected by Seti 2.  I've emailed Mr. Anderson about the issue as you suggested.  Hopefully if he gets enough of these some action may be taken to solve this issue.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 14, 2003, 06:37:17 pm
Programs like SetiQueue and SetiDriver were created to handle problems with non internet connected machines by individuals.  I would be very surprised if the same did not occur with BOINC.  So give it time.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on October 14, 2003, 06:42:50 pm
This post brought to you buy the letter A

As in We need a BOINC Setiqueue
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 14, 2003, 07:10:00 pm
Since it looks like the old threads are going to be "unstickied" I think it may be useful to post a link to them.  Here they are.

Link to Seti thread I
Link to Seti thread II  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Mentat Jon on October 14, 2003, 07:25:05 pm
89) Mentat Jon   120 2530 hr 27 min 21 hr 05 min 13.5 sec Sat Sep 27 13:31:58 2003 United States



the slow creep to the summit continues!!!!  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on October 14, 2003, 08:33:30 pm
Well, due to two factors, I'm going to stop running seti, at least until we get another group going on another project. Lately, I've been having trouble paying bills so I'm turning off everything non-essential to try to drive down my electric bill. The other is just that this part is ending and it looks like there will be a lull between this one and the next so this is a good time to quit.

I just can't believe how fear this relatively small group has gone. We went from nothing to one of the top 200 groups in the world in just a short time. Does anyone know how long this group has be in existence and how long the SETI project has been going?  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Dogmatix! on October 15, 2003, 10:00:46 am
Well, I've been in it since like May of 1999...sadly, most of my time as a member has been on a slow machine.  Most of my total WUs have some since I set up on new rig in February...lol.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 15, 2003, 10:19:37 am
I joined the group in October 1, 2001, I believe when Erik first posted about it or shortly after.  It may have been a semi-private group before that.

It is certainly amazing when you consider that of our little group, I am number 1,948 in the world, Raven is 167 and Cyberkada is #143.

Go us!
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Dogmatix! on October 15, 2003, 10:22:00 am
Yeah...I joined our group shortly after it was set up, too.  In fact, i'm pretty sure I was one of the first five or so people.  When I joined, I was ranked #2 in our group with somewhwere around 1500 WUs...lol...



 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 15, 2003, 10:24:02 am
So who gave us less than 5 stars!

I say we hunt them down and give them the biggest wedgie they've ever felt.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on October 15, 2003, 04:29:35 pm
Seems someone has decided it is their mission to go around giving any thread started by an Admin or Mod 1 star. Just shows that jellyfish can use a keyboard and the internet too...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 16, 2003, 04:19:52 am
I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 16, 2003, 08:32:15 am
Quote:

I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.




Void's ban was temporary, and regardless of my personal opinion of Atra, he hasn't done anything under the rules to get banned for.  IMO, that means the rules need to be tweaked a bit.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 16, 2003, 08:43:21 am
He has a right to his opinon... just show him how it is not a good one.  

We don't want him gone.  

We need to show his arguement as the fool's arguement it is.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 16, 2003, 03:44:08 pm
My point is that Atrahasis pretty much can say anything in these forums with impunity.  Any one else is banned for the exact same thing.  I see the double standard and its appalling.  I guess if we all support radical Islamist terrorism, we can say pretty much anything in these forums.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Taldren_Admin on October 17, 2003, 09:58:18 pm
Quote:

My point is that Atrahasis pretty much can say anything in these forums with impunity.  Any one else is banned for the exact same thing.  I see the double standard and its appalling.  I guess if we all support radical Islamist terrorism, we can say pretty much anything in these forums.
 




Off topic but I will reply to that...

The answer is:

Damned if I do damned if I don't.  He has no impunity. He hasn't crossed the line far enough.

By the way, just in case you were thinking about it.... Please don't post a list of his transgressions. Send me a PM with the links if you really believe that in the way he stated his opinions he has crossed the line.

Now back to our regularly scheduled show.....
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on October 17, 2003, 10:33:18 pm
Quote:

I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.
   




Cyber,

Is this your 523rd or 524th "Im outta here cause(fill in Blank) ?

   
Title: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 18, 2003, 01:44:49 pm
11) Sethan     7500  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: jualdeaux on October 18, 2003, 03:09:54 pm
Good job Nem
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 18, 2003, 08:48:45 pm
Heh - I'm looking to make it into the Taldren top 10 some time this week.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: SPQR Renegade001 on October 19, 2003, 04:52:35 pm
Quote:

11) Sethan     7500  




7500 WU and 8198 posts. Hmmm.... I think I know how to get a few more WUs out of Sethan's machine  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 19, 2003, 09:15:39 pm
Quote:

Quote:

11) Sethan     7500  




7500 WU and 8198 posts. Hmmm.... I think I know how to get a few more WUs out of Sethan's machine  




Chuckle.  Most of those WU are from the last 6 months.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 20, 2003, 11:18:20 am
Well A few notes...  Lost several thousand units due to a slip up with the Queue.

Oh well...

Broke the 100 Year barrier for processing time for Seti WUs!!!

I too think I am going to try to get my Post total more inline with my WU total...

Wonder how long it would take to post 160,000 messages...

Maybe if I hire Sirgod and Sethan fulltime.

GE-Raven


 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 20, 2003, 11:19:50 am

Does anybody know if Brian Kinney changed his Seti nickname to KD4?

Brian disappeared from the group, and KD4 showed up at the same time, with about the right number of WUs.


"Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must first be overcome." -- Samuel Johnson  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 11:25:15 am
Quote:

Wonder how long it would take to post 160,000 messages...

Maybe if I hire Sirgod and Sethan fulltime.  




I'm available...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 20, 2003, 11:38:46 am
Well If I did hire ya I doubt anyone would notice that you were posting for me (except for an increase in volume of those posts).  We have oft been "on the same side of the coin".  Maybe that is why Atra dislikes us so...    

Now as for SIrgod... I would have to clean up that "Okey accent" a bit...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 11:45:58 am
Quote:

Well If I did hire ya I doubt anyone would notice that you were posting for me (except for an increase in volume of those posts).  We have oft been "on the same side of the coin".  Maybe that is why Atra dislikes us so...      




*Gasp*  Do you really think Atra doesn't like us?  I'm so hurt.

I was going more for something like 'deeply detests'.

Ah well.  I'll have to try harder.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: KD4 on October 20, 2003, 02:35:16 pm
Quote:


Does anybody know if Brian Kinney changed his Seti nickname to KD4?

Brian disappeared from the group, and KD4 showed up at the same time, with about the right number of WUs.


"Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must first be overcome." -- Samuel Johnson  




yes i did change my name.. it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 20, 2003, 02:50:08 pm
Quote:


yes i did change my name..




OK, thanks.  And noted as suck.


Quote:

it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  




Sethan will pass Noah Wallace in about 6 days, and Zeppa 2 days after that.  To make it happen in that order, Zeppa will pass Noah in a couple of days.

Down in the 20's, The Postman is cranking out a respectable 18-19 WU per day.  He'll make the top 20 in a couple of months.


"If all it takes for you to give up your freedom are some pretty words or alarming rhetoric, then you are simply not going to remain free" -- Thomas Sowell
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 04:06:07 pm
Quote:

it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  




That long do you think?    I have to admit, I cheat.  I have about 20 low end machines working, and some better ones.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 20, 2003, 06:25:42 pm
Quote:


Down in the 20's, The Postman is cranking out a respectable 18-19 WU per day.  He'll make the top 20 in a couple of months.
 




If seti runs that long  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Mazeppa on October 22, 2003, 06:22:10 am
Quote:

Heh - I'm looking to make it into the Taldren top 10 some time this week.  




10) Sethan  7803  5.132 years 5 hr 45 min 42.4 sec Wed Oct 22 02:08:04 2003 United States

...and you have!  Congratulations!  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 23, 2003, 07:23:23 am
The servers seem to be down this AM and a useless bump to the top of the list.  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 24, 2003, 08:53:19 am
Hey guys, I'm thinking of joining your group!

I've only got 1 PC and I can't run it 24/7 but it is a 2800 XP (barton core) running at 333Mhz with 1GB of RAM and I can crank out a WU in 3 hours, (command line version). What's the fastest you guys have done a WU on your PC, (or fastest PC if you have a network)?

Give me a while to set-it up, (I don't have any WU's to carry over though so I will have to start from 0).
 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 24, 2003, 09:56:07 am
Hey, welcome to the group!


Work Units can vary quite a bit in the length it takes to process them.  I've seen WUs take less than 2 hours, and then WUs take more than 5 hours, on the same machine, with the same load.


It's just the way it is.


"Use wisely your power of choice." -- Og Mandino
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 24, 2003, 10:24:57 am
Ah ok. Well, I've signed up to Taldren now so I guess I'll keep an eye on my average WU time.

Impressive group stats I might add. You guys have processed more WU's than the whole of Egypt put together! W00t!!!

   
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 24, 2003, 11:36:33 pm
Poster: Lurker
Quote:

Hey guys, I'm thinking of joining your group!

I've only got 1 PC and I can't run it 24/7 but it is a 2800 XP (barton core) running at 333Mhz with 1GB of RAM and I can crank out a WU in 3 hours, (command line version). What's the fastest you guys have done a WU on your PC, (or fastest PC if you have a network)?

Give me a while to set-it up, (I don't have any WU's to carry over though so I will have to start from 0).
   




My Athlon 2400XP (thoroughbred core) with 266mhz and 512 MB ram does 1 WU in 2:50 - 2:55 so you should be able to get a little more from that baby.  My other 2 machines process slower, but since they are both dual processor they output more WU's / day by processing two at a time.  Barring crashes my 3 machines put out a total of ~35 WUs/day.  

I just noticed we have passed 600,000  work units.   WOOO!! WOO!!!    

AND!

I passed 5 computer years!

Total CPU Time     5.004 years
SETI@home user for:    1.762 years
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 25, 2003, 04:21:55 pm
Hmmm...2 hours 41 mins for my first WU. I think I'm pleased with that.  

It would be nice to see how that compares with Pentium 4's, with or without Hyperthreading.  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Stormbringer on October 25, 2003, 04:41:03 pm
Maximum PC did benchmarks on th first A64 machines this month 2.2 ghz A64- 55fx; 105 minutes, 3.2 ghz P4c 133 minutes, 2.2 ghz Athlon XP; 136.7 minutes. Don't know about the family scalability speedwise but it is likely the second and third gen chips will be much faster. I'm waiting for them to support nonparity memory (in the works) or for parity memory to become more available and hence less expensive. But I will get one eventually.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 26, 2003, 05:59:51 pm
WU's done = 6

Average time = 2 hr 16 min 33.9 sec

W00T!!!11 Go AMD!    
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Jim on October 28, 2003, 12:43:04 pm
Hey!  

I have been getting an "Unknown ERROR 100" for the last 2 days... anyone have a clue as to what that is???  

Jim
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Gambler on October 28, 2003, 12:47:31 pm
Quote:

Hey!  

I have been getting an "Unknown ERROR 100" for the last 2 days... anyone have a clue as to what that is???  

Jim  




That's a new one to me.  Where have you been getting the error message?
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Jim on October 28, 2003, 12:51:37 pm
Seti starts to run... it tries to connect... it says I have done 0 units so far... and after about 3 seconds the program aborts.  I haven't a clue as to why, but SETI quit running 2 days ago on my computer and I can't get it started again.

Hrm... I just uninstalled SETI v3.07 and installed SETI v3.08... same problem.  The first thing the program tries to do is send a unit I have done to the SETI computer... maybe my work unit was messed up?  Is there anyway to clear that out (just delete the work unit so it won't try to send it the results?)?  Other than that, I have no idea why it won't run...

UPDATE:  While experimenting, I move the 3 files result.sah, temp.sah, and wtemp.sah to a temporary storage area, and the SETI program started.  It immediately downloaded another unit and started working on it.  The user data on the screen for me is now blank... total units listed as 0... but it is running... strange...  Anyone know what those 3 files do?

Thanks in advance

Jim
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 28, 2003, 08:12:22 pm
Is anybody else having trouble with connections? 2 of my p4s are stopped right now because they can't connect.  
Title: can't Connect? Here is the answer
Post by: The Postman on October 28, 2003, 08:41:26 pm
? October 27, 2003 ?
 
Quote:

 ? October 27, 2003 ?
If you are unable to connect due to "100" errors (or perhaps "41") you may need to exit SETI@home, remove the files "result.sah" and "user_info.sah" from your system, and then restart SETI@home. This is probably fallout from the user database crash a few days ago. Sorry for the inconvenience.
 



 
Title: Golden Work Unit Achieved!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 01, 2003, 09:35:13 pm
The Golden Work Unit is what they call it on the SETI message boards when your rank and your results recieved are the same.  

Results Received    11414
Your rank out of 4735612 total users is:    11414th place.

Like mine now is (briefly).  
Title: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: The Postman on November 06, 2003, 08:56:37 am
These forums will be Read only in a week. We need to get this moved or start a new one. If we start a new one, lets get all the important links and instructions in the first post as well as what we are doing so that any new recruits won't have to search the thread.  Maybe somebody could put up what the first post could look like and we could comment on it here.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Gambler on November 06, 2003, 09:22:00 am
Quote:

These forums will be Read only in a week. We need to get this moved or start a new one. If we start a new one, lets get all the important links and instructions in the first post as well as what we are doing so that any new recruits won't have to search the thread.  Maybe somebody could put up what the first post could look like and we could comment on it here.




Did anybody else get a little dizzy when the thread moved?
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: digi on November 12, 2003, 05:45:20 pm
Whoooo!       1904 Units.  2000 Units here I come.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Commander Xizor on November 15, 2003, 04:01:51 pm
What happened to our totals?  It seems to have gone down dramatically the last couple of days.  I know we lost Cyber a while  ago, but did we lose someone else?

At least my 2500 WU's aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 15, 2003, 04:35:54 pm
Quote:

What happened to our totals?  It seems to have gone down dramatically the last couple of days.  I know we lost Cyber a while  ago, but did we lose someone else?

At least my 2500 WU's aren't going anywhere anytime soon.  




Raven left as well.  

My WUs stay as well.    
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: KD4 on November 15, 2003, 08:30:23 pm
why did they leave?
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 15, 2003, 08:40:19 pm
Quote:

why did they leave?  




Neither one said anything they were just gone.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 16, 2003, 08:13:48 pm
I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.

I don't know which order I will achieve them but suspect that passing Max will be last (around Christmas sometime if SETI lasts that long).  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: GE-Raven on November 17, 2003, 09:27:37 am
Quote:

Quote:

why did they leave?  




Neither one said anything they were just gone.    




http://forums.taldren.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=214414&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

This is all I can say.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Fahrenheit on November 17, 2003, 03:46:36 pm
Quote:

I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.

I don't know which order I will achieve them but suspect that passing Max will be last (around Christmas sometime if SETI lasts that long).  





My three goals are:


1) Make 5000th WU. Est: 11 December, 2003

2) Make Taldren's Top 15.  Est: 21 December, 2003

3) Make 1st place in my Registration Class: Estimated Date 14 February 2004


I don't know if I'll make them or not.

 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: GE-Raven on November 18, 2003, 04:45:14 pm
Ok... I am back...

Erik, ya got until Christmas for new goals.

Tick - Tock


GE-Raven

 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Toasty0 on November 18, 2003, 08:23:54 pm
Quote:

Ok... I am back...

Erik, ya got until Christmas for new goals.

Tick - Tock


GE-Raven

   




Christmas? Man, Sean, you're too charitable.

Hey, bro, you done (read my lazy slang as: COMPOSED) any new music you might like to share?

Glad you stayed.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: GE-Raven on November 19, 2003, 08:50:44 am
Nothing new yet, do have a few ideas brewing though...

Glad you stayed too ToastyO... didn't mean to be too hard on ya in the other thread, but I want to make sure I don't appear "biased".

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on November 19, 2003, 12:06:45 pm
Well, I've gone about as high as I'm going to.  I have been asked to remove the SETI client from the machines here at work.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Toasty0 on November 20, 2003, 01:17:56 am
Quote:

Well, I've gone about as high as I'm going to.  I have been asked to remove the SETI client from the machines here at work.  




That's a shame. I hope producing those WUs hasn't caused you any trouble.

Thanks for all the units you did bring in though. They and your participation have moved the project and Taldren SETI forward and is mucho appreciated.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Seti server down
Post by: The Postman on December 03, 2003, 09:27:40 am
FYI
The server has been down this morning for at least the last 4 hours.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: jualdeaux on December 04, 2003, 02:15:04 pm
HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Sethan on December 04, 2003, 03:07:35 pm
Quote:

HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????  




no.
Title: Congrats to Gambler!
Post by: GE-Raven on December 08, 2003, 11:08:06 am
Gambler Breaks 40K

Congrats man...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Congrats to Gambler!
Post by: Gambler on December 08, 2003, 03:04:58 pm
Quote:

Gambler Breaks 40K

Congrats man...

GE-Raven
   




Thank you.  I hadn't paid that much attention to it.    I've been slacking off just a bit.  I did add a new machine to my stable.  Well, I replaced one.  I pulled my P4 750 and replaced it with a P4 2.8.  Merry Christmas to me.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Dogmatix! on December 08, 2003, 03:14:18 pm
Quote:

HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????  





heh...still here, but I've been close to pulling the plug on my 4 1/2 year affiliation with the SETI@home project.  I guess I'm getting a little bored with the whole thing and it's becoming more of a nuisance than anything else.

Additionally, i'm kind of sick of seeing our team's place in the rankings affected so greatly by the whims of members choosing to leave for this reason and that...





 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Reffet on December 10, 2003, 12:47:44 am
Wow, I must have mised a lot! been down for several months (due to job situation) and just now got back online. Just lost a machine due to burned out Microprocessor but stll have my main gun going, Dang - it! Ill never catch you now Pirate.  
Title: Question about command line client and hyper-threading.
Post by: GE-Raven on December 15, 2003, 10:48:00 am
Just noticed that on the new "hyper-threaded" machines that the client only runs at 50%.  Anybody know how to get it back to 99%?

Thanks...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Question about command line client and hyper-threading.
Post by: ChAotiCIllusion on December 15, 2003, 01:33:50 pm
Quote:

Just noticed that on the new "hyper-threaded" machines that the client only runs at 50%.  Anybody know how to get it back to 99%?

Thanks...

GE-Raven
   




You have to run 2 instances of seti seti driver can do this I don't know how to do it any other way. My HT machine can poor out 2 units every 3 hours
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Xizor on December 17, 2003, 09:58:09 pm
From the post in Hot and Spicy by Erik:

Quote:

Okay here is the new goal: Beat Mexico!




Taldren WU: 439300
Mexico WU: 2550330

Tall order indeed.  I'd say some big-crunch recruiting may be in order.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 17, 2003, 10:19:30 pm
Quote:

From the post in Hot and Spicy by Erik:

Quote:

Okay here is the new goal: Beat Mexico!




Taldren WU: 439300
Mexico WU: 2550330

Tall order indeed.  I'd say some big-crunch recruiting may be in order.  




I don't know offhand where you got your numbers but here are mine from the top 200 team list:
Code:

141) Mexico Team    112   504283      580.600 years     10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren        164   439498      354.856 years      7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec

       
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 18, 2003, 08:23:20 am
The difference is probably between the NATION of mexico, and Team Mexico
Title: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 18, 2003, 08:24:37 am
12/17/03
 
Quote:

 141) Mexico Team    112   504283      580.600 years     10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren        164   439498      354.856 years      7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec





Today
 
Quote:

 133) Mexico Team 112 504523 580.775 years 10 hr 05 min 02.2 sec
 155) Taldren 164 439708 354.995 years 7 hr 04 min 20.3 sec


 

Mexico gained 240
Taldren gained 210

for a net gain of -30

I can cut 10  - 15 off the loss once the severs are up and running again and I can get the machines at work running again.
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 18, 2003, 08:49:37 am
You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 18, 2003, 11:13:25 am
There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: RogueJedi_XC on December 18, 2003, 11:17:27 am
Quote:

You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
   




!!!
Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...

 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 18, 2003, 11:46:15 am
 
Quote:

Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...
 




There are 2 P4's and a P3 that need to be running 24/7 in the dispatch. Most of the time they are logged off doing nothing. So I just use the spare clock cycles to run seti with the chiefs OK. Only problem is that because of the network setup these machines are on, I can't use setiQueue to cache and so when the Seti servers go down I need to restart each unit.
   
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 18, 2003, 01:12:20 pm
Quote:

Quote:

You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
   




!!!
Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...

   




I am the Network Admin... I let me run SETI on our machines  

I have actually found it beneficial on machines that run 3d modelling aps such as 3dsmax.  The Win2k Idle thread is bugged and has a memory leak when programs spen a lot of time at 99% processor utilization.  The Seti command line, works much better.  As long as Memory isn't a problem I find Seti to allow the machine to stay "up" much longer without ill-effects.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Xizor on December 18, 2003, 09:36:54 pm
Quote:

The difference is probably between the NATION of mexico, and Team Mexico  




That would be it.  I suppose Team Mexico makes a little more sense.
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 18, 2003, 10:10:25 pm
Quote:

There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page  




Just a little bump.  Welcome back.  Now I have to EARN my way into the top 5.   Sooon.  By New Years perhaps.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 19, 2003, 09:44:07 am
12/17/03
 
Quote:

 141) Mexico Team 112 504283 580.600 years 10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren 164 439498 354.856 years 7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec
 




12/19/03

 Mexico Team - 505310
 Taldren         - 472414

 Mexico Team gained - 1027
 Taldren          gained - 1924 + 30992 from Phillip Showel      
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 19, 2003, 09:52:55 am
Quote:

There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page  




Smallish...

 


GOod to see ya back dread.  Time to kick tail...

BTW I will soon be posing about a milestone for me.
 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 19, 2003, 08:00:18 pm
I say smallish because besides the units i have, i barely get any now.

Most of my old standby machines got nuked, and i;ve been told not to put Seti on them unless i use the machine a ton (ie my work machine)
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 20, 2003, 09:09:09 pm
Quote:

I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.




Goal 1/ Max is still holding on by 281 work units

5) Max Peck     13404
6) IKV Nemesis  13123

Goal 2/ accomplished!  I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4799782 total users is:    9999th place.

Gaining on goal 3/ only .008% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.792% of our users.      
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 21, 2003, 10:55:11 am
 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




12/21/03
Mexico Team - 506718
Taldren - 473158

Team Mexico produced 1408
Taldren produced 744

For a net loss of 664 WU  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 23, 2003, 10:53:22 am
Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.

In other news.  

Raven roars past 200,000 Work Units.

1) Raven     200636    

 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 24, 2003, 06:59:27 am
Quote:

Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.
   




I just recalculated using those links and we are now behind 33194, a gain of 352 in roughly 20 hours.

My #3 computer has an odd work unit processing now.  It has taken 8.5 hours so far and SETISpy is forcasting a total time of 15.5 hours.  That machine usually does a WU in 2.85 hours.  Must have some interesting data.  (AR=1.103, which might normally push the time up a little but nothing like this.  Note, forcast total time for completion has started to drop).

Data below is from SETISpy.
Code:

Spike           Power   Score   Signal ratio   Resolution   Frequency   Time   Drift rate
Best score   198.89    0.697    24.861            0.075             1419265230.60    87.24    -2.7950
Returned 1   196.37    0.691    24.547          0.075             1419259000.72    87.26    0.0037
Returned 2   193.39    0.684    24.174            0.075             1419258999.75    87.26    0.0092
Returned 3   193.57    0.685    24.196            0.075             1419260413.94    33.70    3.8708
Returned 4   186.32    0.668    23.289            0.075             1419265884.75    101.09    -1.4566
Returned 5   194.34    0.687    24.293            0.075             1419265885.13    101.09    -1.4585
Returned 6   192.57    0.683    24.072            0.075             1419265885.50    101.09    -1.4603
Returned 7   181.71    0.657    22.713            0.075             1419265885.87    101.09    -1.4622
Returned 8   198.89    0.697    24.861            0.075             1419265230.59    87.26    -2.7950
Returned 9   189.14    0.675    23.643            0.075             1419265231.56    87.26    -2.8005


       
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 28, 2003, 09:57:37 am
Quote:

Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.

In other news.  

Raven roars past 200,000 Work Units.

1) Raven     200636    

   




Mexico Results received    511516

Taldren  Results received 479594

Mexico's lead = 31922  Gain = 1624 or about 325/day at that rate roughly 98 days until we match them.

I believe Raven put himself back into high gear.  

 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 04, 2004, 08:41:44 am
Mexico Team Results received  516136

Taldren Results received 486645    

Difference = 29491

Since December 23rd a gain of 4055 WUs

Quote:

Goal 1/ Max is still holding on by 281 work units

5) Max Peck 13404
6) IKV Nemesis 13123

Goal 2/ accomplished! I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4799782 total users is: 9999th place.

Gaining on goal 3/ only .008% to go  




Personal goals achieved.

Goal 1/ accomplished!

5) IKV Nemesis 13633
6) Max Peck 13630

That is as high as I go.  There is no way I can catch Dragons business network and everyone else has too much of a lead to catch before SETI 1 ends even if they stopped processing now.  (No I don't know the date SETI 1 ends but it would take 18 months just to reach Dreadlords current stats at my rate of processing WUs)

Goal 2/ accomplished! on December 20 I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4818492 total users is:    9651st place.  Top 9000 here I come.

Gaining on goal 3/ accomplished!  

You have completed more work units than    99.800% of our users.  

Next goal 99.85%.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on January 17, 2004, 08:32:01 am
 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  
Title: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 19, 2004, 06:33:26 pm
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis

Results Received    14172
Total CPU Time    6.177 years

Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 49 min 04.6 sec
Average results received per day    19.42

Last result returned:   Tue Jan 20 00:16:44 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   2.000 years

Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 4844072 total users is:    9334th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.807% of our users.  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 20, 2004, 08:41:18 am
Happy Aniversary.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dogmatix! on January 20, 2004, 04:05:46 pm
I've been on the team since it was started and I've actually been crunching SETI WUs since May of 1999 but as of this past weekend, I'd decided to pretty much stop participating in the project.   In fact, they pretty much ceased about two weeks ago due to my wife always closing the SETI Driver program rather than just minimizing it when she was using the computer.  During that time, I got passed up by one or two guys on our team that I was outproducing.  Aside from a general boredom with the program itself, I've grown tired of fighting the Spousal Unit's general disregard for my wish to crunch SETI WUs as quickly as possible.


I'll likely just leave my meager total of completed WUs with the Taldren team but my slow and steady trickle of 10-15 WUs per day will cease.


It's been fun...heheh.


 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 20, 2004, 06:12:23 pm
Quote:

I've been on the team since it was started and I've actually been crunching SETI WUs since May of 1999 but as of this past weekend, I'd decided to pretty much stop participating in the project.   In fact, they pretty much ceased about two weeks ago due to my wife always closing the SETI Driver program rather than just minimizing it when she was using the computer.  During that time, I got passed up by one or two guys on our team that I was outproducing.  Aside from a general boredom with the program itself, I've grown tired of fighting the Spousal Unit's general disregard for my wish to crunch SETI WUs as quickly as possible.


I'll likely just leave my meager total of completed WUs with the Taldren team but my slow and steady trickle of 10-15 WUs per day will cease.


It's been fun...heheh.


 




You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.
 
Title: I have arrived
Post by: The Postman on January 21, 2004, 06:46:32 pm
The Postman  
Results Received  4431
Your rank out of 4846988 total users is:  48458th place.  
The number of users who have this rank:  22  
 You have completed more work units than  99.000% of our users.    
   
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 21, 2004, 06:50:22 pm
Quote:

You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.




Any particular reason for the change?  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 22, 2004, 11:19:28 am
Quote:

Quote:

You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.




Any particular reason for the change?  




Yes.  But it's a Dynaverse thing.
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 22, 2004, 12:48:39 pm
so anyone here know how to run SETI client on Linux ?

Think I got the client, but before I go nuts with it, I thought I would get some tips.

I need to find a way to get my numbers up!

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 25, 2004, 01:30:34 pm
Quote:

so anyone here know how to run SETI client on Linux ?

Think I got the client, but before I go nuts with it, I thought I would get some tips.

I need to find a way to get my numbers up!

GE-Raven
   




First of all, nice pic.

Next...."I need to find a way to get my numbers up"....LOL

Try:

http://theconsortium.info/print.php?sid=18

http://www.setiteam.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&catid=&topic=6

To see if these might help.

Maz  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 28, 2004, 05:17:00 am
Yay i made 3k wus

 24) Lobo   3024 3.179 years 9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003 United States
25) f9TH SIR X   3004 2.433 years 7 hr 05 min 44.4 sec Tue Jan 27 05:49:54 2004 New Zealand
26) Bill Castner   2935 2.085 years 6 hr 13 min 19.3 sec Wed Jan 28 08:21:52 2004 United States

 And who is the new Dizzy hater in 9th place    
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 28, 2004, 08:42:12 am
Quote:



 And who is the new Dizzy hater in 9th place    




LOL! The one time in a month I check this thread it comes on the heels of a post like this.

Sheesh!
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 29, 2004, 04:37:18 am
Well its here in black and white

 9) Dizzy is a Dirty Cheating Snothead   8977 11.217 years 10 hr 56 min 45.1 sec Fri Jan 16 14:04:29 2004 United States
   
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 29, 2004, 05:08:32 am
I dont understand. wtf is that?
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 30, 2004, 03:28:22 am
  Its the person who is in 9th place team name

1) Raven   225963 135.199 years 5 hr 14 min 28.7 sec Thu Jan 29 17:46:22 2004 United States
2) ICE Gambler   44125 38.506 years 7 hr 38 min 40.0 sec Thu Jan 29 16:00:24 2004 United States
3) Phillip Showel   31351 27.345 years 7 hr 38 min 26.0 sec Thu Jan 29 18:32:35 2004 United States
4) Dragon93   19094 26.309 years 12 hr 04 min 12.7 sec Thu Jan 29 16:26:54 2004 United States
5) IKV Nemesis   14486 6.299 years 3 hr 48 min 32.6 sec Thu Jan 29 04:13:42 2004 Canada
6) Max Peck   14041 8.568 years 5 hr 20 min 42.6 sec Thu Jan 29 18:11:39 2004 Canada
7) Sethan   9298 6.031 years 5 hr 40 min 54.6 sec Thu Jan 29 16:36:50 2004 United States
8) KD4   9209 5.136 years 4 hr 53 min 09.7 sec Thu Jan 29 17:07:27 2004 United States
  9) Dizzy is a Dirty Cheating Snothead   8977 11.217 years 10 hr 56 min 45.1 sec Fri Jan 16 14:04:29 2004 United States  
10) Noah Wallace III   8651 7.531 years 7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004 United States
11) Kenneth Yeast   7894 6.818 years 7 hr 33 min 55.6 sec Thu Jan 29 18:02:13 2004 United States
12) Nasim  7402 3.019 years 3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003 Canada
13) ChAotiCIllusion   6745 2.657 years 3 hr 27 min 04.8 sec Thu Jan 29 11:08:51 2004 United Kingdom
14) KBF-Dogmatix    5811 4.097 years 6 hr 10 min 32.6 sec Sun Jan 18 04:23:20 2004 United States
15) Intrepid-XC   5089 4.430 years 7 hr 37 min 35.2 sec Thu Jan 29 17:07:30 2004 United States
16) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
17) Sven Forkbeard   4834 7.140 years 12 hr 56 min 22.0 sec Thu Jan 29 13:40:38 2004 United States
18) The Postman   4573 2.667 years 5 hr 06 min 33.6 sec Thu Jan 29 16:18:18 2004 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States
20) SGM RAS   4046 6.853 years 14 hr 50 min 18.0 sec Sat Jan 3 14:15:19 2004 United States
21) RazalYllib   3669 3.833 years 9 hr 09 min 06.8 sec Thu Jan 29 03:19:48 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3575 1.580 years 3 hr 52 min 14.5 sec Wed Jan 28 04:45:04 2004 United States
23) Ronbo   3334 2.628 years 6 hr 54 min 17.7 sec Thu Jan 29 08:26:22 2004 United States
24) Lobo   3024 3.179 years 9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003 United States
25) f9TH SIR X   3017 2.439 years 7 hr 04 min 58.5 sec Thu Jan 29 08:22:05 2004 New Zealand
26) Bill Castner   2945 2.088 years 6 hr 12 min 41.2 sec Thu Jan 29 18:42:16 2004 United States
27) Jim   2729 2.210 years 7 hr 05 min 42.0 sec Thu Jan 29 11:42:58 2004 United States
28) digi  2359 8106 hr 53 min 3 hr 26 min 11.6 sec Fri Dec 19 22:14:35 2003 United Kingdom

  And no i dont know who it is  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: KD4 on January 30, 2004, 04:05:19 am
who was in that spot a few days before?    
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 30, 2004, 09:14:46 am
Originally posted by Mazeppa:

Quote:



You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.
   




Any help?

 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 30, 2004, 09:38:51 am
yeah, lets find out who it is, hehe. Its obvious its prolly a D2 player. I want to find out so I can hunt his ass down and kill him on the next server. I'll bet he will be playing RDSL... Muhahahahaha!!!
Title: Anybody miss me?
Post by: Dragon93 on February 05, 2004, 05:55:26 pm
So once again, the demands of life, employment and other things have sucked away most of my free time and I have been absent from the forum for a bit. I also went through a bit of an anti-social phase as I am wont to do from time to time.

Anyway, I decided to drop in and say hello as it has been far too long. Still pumping out WUs, though that is mostly on autopilot right now. I was quite surprised to see that I am creeping up to the 20,000 mark in the near future...

Good to see things are still cooking and good to see some familiar names.

Until next time...
 
Title: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: GE-Raven on February 09, 2004, 04:22:30 pm
Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: The Postman on February 10, 2004, 01:50:13 pm
Quote:

Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
   




Why don't you go back to the screen saver on these machines?  
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: DreadlordGW on February 10, 2004, 07:25:31 pm
From my experience even the screensaver interferes somewhat.

Quote:

Quote:

Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
   




Why don't you go back to the screen saver on these machines?  


Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: digi on February 11, 2004, 03:42:40 am
I've been away from SETI crunching for a couple of months now, but I thought I'd come back.  I've just got a new machine to add into the fray.  Dual 2.8Ghz H/T P4.  Very sweet - its running 4 units at once.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on February 11, 2004, 07:37:54 pm
Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: Bob Graham on February 18, 2004, 05:30:33 pm
Long time no speak all.  What is this 'BONIC' and is it as evil as the name sounds?
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: digi on March 17, 2004, 05:52:34 am
Quote:

Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.    





How goes the quest to beat Mexico?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Age on March 17, 2004, 01:19:21 pm
    You are right Nemesis you do spend a lot of time in here and this is a big Thread to big to sink my teeth into
 I though you meant Canadas place in the sun.I guess I will have to read all this sometime and when I get it .

  Let just not argue about are ships ok  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sirgod on March 17, 2004, 01:36:57 pm
Welcome here Age, If you have broadband, then Please sign up, and help the taldren team out. I know you can do It with dial up, But It does help for prossesing alot of WU's.

and yes, I'll try and get back on the bandwagon again and Get a few WU's done at night.

stephen
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on March 17, 2004, 03:12:34 pm
Quote:

Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




As of 2/11/04
135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.    




As of 3/14/04

Mexico  572021
Taldren  552530

Since 2/11, Mexico has produced 25,886
Since 2/11, Taldren has produced 27,488
for a net gain of 1602 or 50.06/day
At this pace, it will take 389.35 days to catch Mexico  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: digi on March 17, 2004, 04:00:05 pm
Ouch - Thats a long time.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 12:37:32 am
Quote:

    You are right Nemesis you do spend a lot of time in here and this is a big Thread to big to sink my teeth into
 I though you meant Canadas place in the sun.I guess I will have to read all this sometime and when I get it .

  Let just not argue about are ships ok    




Not argue debate .   I didn't take it too seriously.

Since no one has posted a team list in a long time here is one:

Top Members:
Name (and URL)    Results received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     252484    149.524 years    5 hr 11 min 15.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:22:07 2004    United States
2) ICE Gambler     48806    42.022 years    7 hr 32 min 32.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:12:29 2004    United States
3) Phillip Showel     31589    27.548 years    7 hr 38 min 21.6 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:19:35 2004    United States
4) Dragon93     21524    29.278 years    11 hr 54 min 57.3 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:47:19 2004    United States
 5) IKV Nemesis     16476    7.055 years    3 hr 45 min 03.5 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:32:08 2004    Canada
6) Max Peck     14617    8.844 years    5 hr 18 min 01.0 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:34:14 2004    Canada
7) KD4     9919    5.366 years    4 hr 44 min 20.6 sec    Thu Mar 18 04:27:16 2004    United States
8) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
9) Dizzy is Still a Snot     9125    11.437 years    10 hr 58 min 45.2 sec    Fri Mar 12 15:51:25 2004    United States
10) Noah Wallace III    8651    7.531 years    7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec    Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004    United States
11) Kenneth Yeast     8606    7.175 years    7 hr 18 min 11.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:39:59 2004    United States
12) ChAotiCIllusion     7576    2.903 years    3 hr 21 min 23.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:34:40 2004    United Kingdom
13) Nasim    7402    3.019 years    3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec    Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003    Canada
14) KBF-Dogmatix     5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
15) The Postman     5479    3.194 years    5 hr 06 min 24.0 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:50:08 2004    United States
16) Intrepid-XC     5345    4.656 years    7 hr 37 min 51.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:54:51 2004    United States
17) Sven Forkbeard     4939    7.247 years    12 hr 51 min 09.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:49:02 2004    United States
18) Fahrenheit    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
19) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
20) SGM RAS     4131    6.958 years    14 hr 45 min 14.3 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:49:24 2004    United States
21) RazalYllib     4009    4.018 years    8 hr 46 min 46.4 sec    Wed Mar 17 15:14:15 2004    United States
22) RedHotChiliDog    3626    1.601 years    3 hr 52 min 04.3 sec    Wed Mar 17 12:56:52 2004    United States
23) Ronbo     3374    2.701 years    7 hr 00 min 44.8 sec    Wed Mar 17 12:21:01 2004    United States
24) f9TH SIR X     3248    2.548 years    6 hr 52 min 23.5 sec    Tue Mar 16 10:30:47 2004    New Zealand
25) Bill Castner     3230    2.252 years    6 hr 06 min 26.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 04:55:40 2004    United States
26) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
27) Jim     2916    2.331 years    7 hr 00 min 14.2 sec    Sun Mar 14 23:10:47 2004    United States
28) digi    2872    1.152 years    3 hr 30 min 53.9 sec    Wed Mar 17 08:31:53 2004    United Kingdom
29) hobbesmaster     2613    1.610 years    5 hr 23 min 55.8 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:47:23 2004    United States
30) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
31) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
32) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
33) Reffet     2095    1.584 years    6 hr 37 min 28.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:30:09 2004    United States
34) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
35) BobGraham     1846    1.161 years    5 hr 30 min 37.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 00:33:28 2004    United States
36) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
37) Hollis J. Wood    1666    1.313 years    6 hr 54 min 08.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:41:29 2004    Canada
38) Malystryx_XC     1417    1.578 years    9 hr 45 min 24.7 sec    Mon Mar 15 20:45:47 2004    United States
39) Xeir     1242    2.477 years    17 hr 28 min 20.8 sec    Sun Mar 7 21:47:03 2004    United States
40) Iceman     1238    1.218 years    8 hr 37 min 10.0 sec    Mon Oct 27 05:14:57 2003    United States
41) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
42) Kroma BaSyl    1129    5548 hr 26 min    4 hr 54 min 52.1 sec    Sat Oct 11 14:26:50 2003    United States
43) lapt    1076    1.095 years    8 hr 54 min 48.1 sec    Wed Mar 17 20:13:16 2004    United States
44) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
45) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
46) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
47) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
48) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
49) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
50) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
51) Daniel     695    1.190 years    14 hr 59 min 58.4 sec    Wed Mar 17 17:33:07 2004    United States
52) davezzzz    678    7598 hr 32 min    11 hr 12 min 26.2 sec    Wed Mar 17 05:26:49 2004    United States
53) Harlequin     621    4614 hr 18 min    7 hr 25 min 49.5 sec    Wed Oct 1 19:41:36 2003    United Kingdom
54) thirdleg     601    2758 hr 38 min    4 hr 35 min 24.3 sec    Fri Feb 6 03:35:28 2004    United States
55) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
56) TalonClaw     579    1.461 years    22 hr 06 min 07.3 sec    Fri Feb 27 17:03:43 2004    United States
57) Toasty0    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
58) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids     546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
59) Speaker to Aliens     500    8402 hr 09 min    16 hr 48 min 15.5 sec    Sun Dec 7 01:05:53 2003    United Kingdom
60) Ogma     485    5957 hr 47 min    12 hr 17 min 02.7 sec    Wed Mar 17 20:47:10 2004    United States
61) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
62) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
63) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
64) Towelie     406    4316 hr 02 min    10 hr 37 min 50.2 sec    Sat Feb 28 04:30:36 2004    United States
65) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
66) Tanked_Up     397    4973 hr 51 min    12 hr 31 min 42.9 sec    Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2003    United Kingdom
67) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
68) Lancer of TAC     311    4673 hr 17 min    15 hr 01 min 35.9 sec    Tue Dec 2 04:57:06 2003    United States
69) Spectre     295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
70) awm3     287    2510 hr 14 min    8 hr 44 min 47.4 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:28:06 2004    Canada
71) Grimklink     280    1.044 years    32 hr 40 min 25.4 sec    Mon Mar 15 13:44:10 2004    United States
72) Captain_Krenn     280    4547 hr 47 min    16 hr 14 min 31.5 sec    Fri Mar 5 05:39:16 2004    United States
73) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
74) Rick Regan     278    3475 hr 08 min    12 hr 30 min 01.7 sec    Thu Jan 23 18:57:39 2003    United States
75) SPQR Kremen     275    1688 hr 36 min    6 hr 08 min 25.5 sec    Tue Mar 16 11:23:12 2004    Australia
76) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
77) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
78) Otenki     184    1072 hr 48 min    5 hr 49 min 49.7 sec    Sun Nov 23 14:10:42 2003    Canada
79) jimmythehat    183    1930 hr 48 min    10 hr 33 min 02.9 sec    Mon Dec 29 05:10:33 2003    United States
80) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
81) TAG-Draco     172    1678 hr 13 min    9 hr 45 min 25.8 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:28:17 2004    United States
82) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
83) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
84) Max     158    2447 hr 32 min    15 hr 29 min 26.8 sec    Wed Mar 17 08:13:16 2004    United Kingdom
85) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
86) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
87) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
88) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
89) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
90) Chrisr118     133    748 hr 46 min    5 hr 37 min 47.5 sec    Tue Apr 29 09:44:50 2003    Canada
91) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
92) keravnos     116    2030 hr 45 min    17 hr 30 min 23.3 sec    Wed Mar 17 23:43:57 2004    Greece
93) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
94) Matsukasi     115    6326 hr 12 min    55 hr 00 min 37.9 sec    Sun Mar 14 01:58:36 2004    United States
95) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
96) clintk     96    902 hr 24 min    9 hr 24 min 00.6 sec    Thu Mar 11 08:13:53 2004    United Kingdom
97) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
98) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
99) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
100) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
101) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
102) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
103) Orthae     78    1130 hr 47 min    14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec    Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002    United States
104) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
105) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
106) Lairis     75    829 hr 42 min    11 hr 03 min 46.2 sec    Fri Mar 12 01:31:41 2004    United States
107) Sakrot     71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
108) Rob     62    1433 hr 05 min    23 hr 06 min 52.0 sec    Thu Oct 2 05:12:26 2003    United States
109) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
110) Apocolypse     52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
111) GreenLantern    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
112) sirgod     48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
113) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
114) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
115) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
116) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
117) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
118) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
119) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
120) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
121) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
122) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
123) Tus     24    912 hr 22 min    38 hr 00 min 56.5 sec    Mon Aug 18 16:21:37 2003    United States
124) F9thTheJudge     23    856 hr 36 min    37 hr 14 min 37.5 sec    Tue Mar 9 13:55:38 2004    United States
125) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
126)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
127) Hilton     17    620 hr 39 min    36 hr 30 min 33.1 sec    Mon Mar 15 16:17:08 2004    United States
128) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
129) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
130) SFCSpoonman     16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
131) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
132) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
133) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
134) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
135) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
136) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
137) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
138) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
139) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
140) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
141) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
142) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
143) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
144) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
145) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
146) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
147) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
148) FRA_C_Blade_XC     3    22 hr 18 min    7 hr 26 min 11.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:20:43 2004    United States
149) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
150) Beanardo     2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
151) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
152) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
153) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
154) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
155) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
156) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 12:41:05 am
Quote:

Welcome here Age, If you have broadband, then Please sign up, and help the taldren team out. I know you can do It with dial up, But It does help for prossesing alot of WU's.

stephen  




You don't need broadband if you use the SETIDriver setup I posted.  I did 49WUs yesterday and my current 7 day average is 43.6/day and I am on dialup.

I should probably check the links in that message to see if they are still current and if not post an update.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 01:24:20 am
Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 18, 2004, 06:42:12 am
What is a SETI?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 09:25:04 am
Quote:

What is a SETI?  




     
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on March 18, 2004, 09:30:24 am
Quote:

What is a SETI?  




Search for Extra - Terrestrial Intelligence.

Having found none on the forum, we have decided to look elsewhere

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 09:41:45 am
57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 18, 2004, 10:17:27 am
Quote:

57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 




Thinking of starting up again? We could use your output!    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 10:21:21 am
I have...but I'm still just one machine fighting against the odds...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 06:11:14 pm
Quote:

Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  




I will see about fixing it this weekend. Thanks.  It needs to be transferred to this forum anyhow.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 19, 2004, 05:08:59 am
I still don't understand.

What's with the time and date?

How does it work?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 19, 2004, 06:46:48 am
Quote:

57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 




This person is ranked in 57th place in the Taldren team.
His user name is ToastyO.
He has completed 557 SETI workunits.
His computer(s) spent 3056 hours and 19 minutes crunching these workunits.
5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec is the average time spent on each workunit.
Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003  was the last time he turned in results for processed workunits.
The country is identified because this project has participants from around the world.  
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 19, 2004, 08:33:57 pm
 Funny thing is that for nearly 2 years I haven't been able to run SETI. And I am still #61.  

 I wonder what I would need to do to get it started again on my laptop here. hmmm....  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 19, 2004, 09:48:10 pm
Quote:

Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  




Update made.  

Quote:

I have...but I'm still just one machine fighting against the odds...
Jerry  





That is how I started.  Before The Great Moo Hunt.  Now I have four.  

Link to SETI FAQ

What is SETI @ Home? (abbreviated SAH)

SAH  is a distributed computing project designed to analyze signals recieved by the radio telescope at Arecibo looking for signs of alien intelligence.   Each computer in the project downloads data packets (commonly referred to as Work Units or WUs), processes the WU using either a commandline client (fastest) or a screen saver client (slowest).  SAH is an actual scientific research project running out of the University of Berkeley (SETI Homepage).  

As of earlier today SAH has 4,925,491 total users.  Unfortunately about 1/3 or them never processed a single WU.    
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 20, 2004, 12:14:32 am

  After a year and a half off,  I finally rejoined Team Taldren.
*applause and cheering in background)

  So shortly I will be chompin away at them work units. Too bad my MIS on base won't let me run it on the gov't comp.
 Anywaym what is sad is that either I don't remember my email addy from that far back or Seti deleted it after being inactive for so long. In either case, my first goal is to beat myself.
*snicker*
 

 Nevermind. I had a Beavis and Butthead moment.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 20, 2004, 09:27:13 am
Nem,

I'm experiencing issues with the Seti Client running on my machine. Not sure what it is yet, but one of the things is I think it is using up all my resources even though I have it set for "low".

ack!

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 20, 2004, 11:58:03 am
1/ What OS are you using?

2/ Did you use my SETIDriver set up?

3/ Symptoms?  All programs or only some (which programs have you tried?)

 
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 20, 2004, 07:14:31 pm
Now at 142 and climbing. whoo hoo!!! I figure by May I should overtake my old spot of #61  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 02:08:51 am
Quote:

1/ What OS are you using?

2/ Did you use my SETIDriver set up?

3/ Symptoms?  All programs or only some (which programs have you tried?)

   




I may have found it. Seems that NeroBurns INCd packet writing software likes to conflict with several other programs including McAfee's virus detection software. So, this may also be suspect in regards to the SETI CLI. I'll let you know after a couple days of testing/running.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 06:35:37 am
Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 07:40:56 am
Quote:

Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?  




Essentially correct.  One thing to add however is if you are the lucky one to do the processing that finds ET you will be publicly credited with it.  Your 15 minutes of fame.  

My Data:

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    16613
Total CPU Time    7.107 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 44 min 51.0 sec
Average results received per day    20.99
Last result returned:   Sun Mar 21 13:30:59 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   2.168 years
Your group info:
You belong to the group named:    Taldren
You are not currently the founder of any teams.
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 4927160 total users is:    8125th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    2
You have completed more work units than    99.835% of our users.

There are other projects that use the SETI concept to do other research.  Cancer and Anthrax research for example.   SETI was merely first and biggest.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 09:45:45 am
Quote:

Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?  




Now only that, but in your case you might actually find Star Man.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 12:30:24 pm
But, of course, no one ever finds an ET.

Sooooooooooooo, why do you do this?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on March 21, 2004, 01:16:03 pm
I think that some people do it in the hope that someone will ultimately find a signal. Others might just do it o be a part of a group of like minded people. There are also some who just like the challenge of trying to work their way up through the ranks and try to get to the top of th list. Iin this group alone there were a number of people had an informal, or formal, race to see who could produce the most. That lead to quite a few races that ultimately increased the performance of the group and also lead to people learning more about the computers they used and how to get the most out of them. I distinctly remember people building totally new computers just sothey would have much better processing times.   Anyway, there are many reasons people joined the group.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 21, 2004, 01:49:40 pm
   

As you can see the Arecibo Radio Telescope only covers a fraction of the sky. Every red dot is a potential signal, however unlikely, where ET might be found. ET might be found in another part of the sky or ET's signal might not reach Earth for another thousand years. Who really knows? We certainly won't find him if we don't look.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 03:16:12 pm
Ok, I understand now.

<backs out of room.... turns and runs>
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 10:04:58 pm
Quote:

But, of course, no one ever finds an ET.

Sooooooooooooo, why do you do this?  




No one has to date.  

Of course there was a time when people were told the same about hunting for the mythical city of Troy.  Then one day some one found it, it was not a myth afterall.  

Perhaps today will be the day SETI finds a signal.  But not if no one is looking.   I will keep looking for my mythical signal.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 11:20:55 pm
Quote:

Microsoft man funds ET search

March 21, 2004 - 1:52AM

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, one of the richest men on Earth, today pledged to donate $US13.5 million ($17.99 million) for research into extra-terrestrial life.

With the contribution, Allen will have given $US25 million ($33.32 million) for construction of the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), a network of 350 radio telescopes being built to find signs of life in space, said Thomas Pierson, director of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute.

The radio telescopes will measure the density of the early universe, the formation of stars and magnetic fields.

They will also be capable of searching for "possible signals from technologically advanced civilisations elsewhere in the galaxy," according to a SETI statement.

The announcement of Allen's donation coincided with the completion of the project's research and development phases, which Allen funded with an $US11.5 million ($15.33 million) donation.

The $US13.5 million donation will pay for the first two phases of construction of the ATA, according to the statement.

One network of 32 telescopes will be available for research by the end of 2004 and the entire network of 350 telescopes will be completed "late in the decade," it said.

SETI and the Radio Astronomy Laboratory of the University of California at Berkley teamed up for the ATA project.

"I am very excited to be supporting one of the world's most visionary efforts to seek basic answers to some of the fundamental question about our universe and what other civilisations may exist elsewhere," Allen said in a ceremony in Mountain View, California, where SETI is based.


 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 11:24:35 pm
oh, those evil MS bast'ds...how dare they promote progressive research. *gasp*

hehehehe...meanwhile in other news, Linux claims to have found another Kernal Sanders...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: ActiveX on March 22, 2004, 11:33:52 am
I'm looking now hehe...

I only got 4 WUs done sofar, but it took less than 18 hours for them...

To catch up to Raven though I'll need to build more than an FX-53 hehe...
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 22, 2004, 02:05:44 pm
Kick Butt Active!!!!


 I know what you are saying about Raven. lol. I doubt even the collective work of my bases antiquainted computers can catch that guy.

 Me... Right now I am just focused on beating Rick Knox(pneumonic81), Hawkeye and myself. Seems to be a bit more feasable.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 22, 2004, 06:37:47 pm
Quote:

oh, those evil MS bast'ds...how dare they promote progressive research. *gasp*

hehehehe...meanwhile in other news, Linux claims to have found another Kernal Sanders...  




Actually as I understand it Paul Allen left the company a long time ago.  Before they were known as evil bostiches.   Paul Allen is also the guy funding Spaceship One.   He seems to be more of a visionary and less a power seeker then his ex-partner Gates.  Unlike Gates he makes little or no effort to publicize his philanthropy.   He quietly does what he does without seeking public recognition.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 22, 2004, 06:46:34 pm
Spaceship one set to make second powered flight. Story is at space.com.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 23, 2004, 04:14:53 am
   What happened in the first powered flight? I thought that they lost it the first time.

Oh!!!
 I know I have been gone for almost 2 years, but what is the deal with the Taldrenite Haven? I recogonize some of the names from when Erik and the community first started the Taldren team, and what I think became the biggest or second biggest thread. I remember that monster Star Wars vs Star Trek thread might have been the biggest, oh and that plasma thread.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 23, 2004, 06:01:40 am
I see we picked up a couple of new names. Anybody spot who or where they are?  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 23, 2004, 08:10:58 am
Does anybody have an extra P4 400mhz lying around surplus to their needs? I am currently running a 1.5  and thought it might be a good time to upgrade.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: ActiveX on March 23, 2004, 08:52:00 am
I'm at 138th place right now...

136th now
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 23, 2004, 11:40:23 am
Dunno. I'm just Gate crashing at the moment. I will probably pick it up in a couple of months.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 23, 2004, 11:41:43 am
It crashed IIRC but they repaired the damage and fixed the issues that caused it.  As to the havens I think they moved thier groups comms to another forum at the TCS. I think they are still active. Some of thier members had a disagreement with enforcement of taldren forum rules and left. The rest followed the core over there but most are still active here just not regarding the havens.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 23, 2004, 02:59:10 pm
 Hey there...

  Well, I am new sort of. *snicker*
 Ok, not really. I have just been gone for a while (year and a half). I have that military thing going on.
 Currently my old SETI acct is #61 but my current one is #125 and creeping up.  I should be able to overtake Rick Knox at #121 in about 6 hours and then it is on to Hawkeye.  
 What ever happened to him or Xak Tsaroth?
 
Title: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 23, 2004, 07:22:35 pm
7) KD4     10003     5.393 years    4 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Tue Mar 23 23:43:09 2004    United States

Congratulations on joining the 5 figure club and on your new certificate.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 23, 2004, 07:32:57 pm
Quote:

   What happened in the first powered flight? I thought that they lost it the first time.

Oh!!!
 I know I have been gone for almost 2 years, but what is the deal with the Taldrenite Haven? I recogonize some of the names from when Erik and the community first started the Taldren team, and what I think became the biggest or second biggest thread. I remember that monster Star Wars vs Star Trek thread might have been the biggest, oh and that plasma thread.  




There was a landing gear malfunction.  Minimal damage.  We discussed it here at the time (see link below)

Link to thread  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 24, 2004, 02:07:01 pm
 Thanks Nem.
 I think the next cool thing as far as space goes is that we have a sattelite arriving at Saturn in June this year. It is supposed to have some probes go into the atmosphere of Titan.
 Cassini mission
  Anyway.... I am gradually movng up. It is a shame that so many people have gone inactive. But newcomers ActiveX and Cross are making great progress, infact I think cross will be passig me up tommorow. Good stuff.
   
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 24, 2004, 02:32:47 pm
Quote:

7) KD4     10003     5.393 years    4 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Tue Mar 23 23:43:09 2004    United States

Congratulations on joining the 5 figure club and on your new certificate.  






thanks. after all these years i finly make the 10,000 mark  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 24, 2004, 09:07:15 pm
Quote:


thanks. after all these years i finly make the 10,000 mark  




How many calendar years did it take?  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 25, 2004, 05:34:21 am
i started on may 17 1999. changed isp and forgot to get my password and had to start new account dec 29 1999. for some time i used a old 266. only in the last year did i start useing 2 computers.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 27, 2004, 12:25:08 am
Quote:

i started on may 17 1999. changed isp and forgot to get my password and had to start new account dec 29 1999. for some time i used a old 266. only in the last year did i start useing 2 computers.  




Nearly 5 years on SETI?  You are one of the old timers.  At just past two years I am rather a Johnny come lately.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 27, 2004, 05:12:43 am
lol ya i am a old timer. when i frist heard about it i could see the posabilty for future research in other fields. think of all the computers that set on screan saver all night. i tried some of the medical research a few years back but i found them to be to intrusive. with seti driver set on low i dont ever notice it taking away from what i am doing. i realy dont think our tech is far enough alone to where we have much of a chance to find anything.
If there is a more worthy project out there that will work like seti driver i would be willing to move to that if we did it as a team.
sorry but its 6 am and time for me to go to bed  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 28, 2004, 11:01:43 pm
Quote:

lol ya i am a old timer. when i frist heard about it i could see the posabilty for future research in other fields. think of all the computers that set on screan saver all night. i tried some of the medical research a few years back but i found them to be to intrusive. with seti driver set on low i dont ever notice it taking away from what i am doing. i realy dont think our tech is far enough alone to where we have much of a chance to find anything.

If there is a more worthy project out there that will work like seti driver i would be willing to move to that if we did it as a team.
sorry but its 6 am and time for me to go to bed  




We (as a team) were considering at one point what to do after SETI 1 ended and couldn't decide.  Some of the projects look interesting but many of us object to the proprietary nature of the programs.  Then again some of them allow the people behind the system to jump you to another project without even giving you a choice.  

I also don't think it likely that we will find anything.  But it is worth the chance.   The attempt has already proven the practicality of distributed volunteer processing to help scientific research.  

On a more personal level I just achieved a goal

 Your rank out of 4939040 total users is:    7994th place.  

Top 8000 and on to 7500.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: nexa1 on March 31, 2004, 02:46:19 pm
  You kick butt man.  So you are like now officially one of the big guns eh?
 
 I still think I will find ET before you.  NAH!
   
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: ActiveX on March 31, 2004, 04:55:32 pm
Im turning them out 1 about every 4 hours and 17 minutes, but you are faster at 3 hours and 39 minutes...

When I put together my uber crunching box, I'll be spittin 2 an hour hehe...
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 31, 2004, 05:12:35 pm
Quote:

  You kick butt man.  So you are like now officially one of the big guns eh?
 
 I still think I will find ET before you.  NAH!
   




Intermediate gun.  Guys like Raven are the big guns.  

Just so long as someone finds ET its all good.  

 
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: nexa1 on April 02, 2004, 06:21:05 pm
LOL...

 You are cool Nem.

On a side not, I should break the top 100 in about 12 hours.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: ActiveX on April 03, 2004, 02:47:48 am
I still got 40 to go till I get that far...
Title: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 03, 2004, 08:39:26 pm
Quote:

LOL...

 You are cool Nem.

On a side not, I should break the top 100 in about 12 hours.  




Quote:

99) nexa1     90    333 hr 25 min    3 hr 42 min 16.8 sec    Sun Apr 4 00:33:59 2004    United States




Congratulations on reaching that landmark.  Always nice to see someone moving up the ranks.    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: nexa1 on April 05, 2004, 05:36:06 am
 Well, it is a big one for me considering that it took so long to crunch units with my last computer.
 So these are my stats now.
62) nexa1   476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
98) nexa1     97   357 hr 52 min   3 hr 41 min 21.9 sec Mon Apr 5 07:53:19 2004 United States

 And check out ActiveX he's movin too. Whoo hoo!
110) ActiveX   68 291 hr 12 min 4 hr 16 min 57.2 sec Mon Apr 5 02:43:40 2004 United States

 I am not sure what happened to Cross here. He was doing so well, but I guess he had to stop for some reason. If he hadn't he wold have passed me already.
111) Cross   65 202 hr 22 min 3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004 United States

 So anything big going on with the team?
 
Oh hey Nemesis... what is your nations name?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 05, 2004, 04:03:02 pm
Well, I have just added a 350mhz P2 to the mix. My average time will probably start going up now.  It seems to be pushing them out about every 14 - 15 hours.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 05, 2004, 05:14:45 pm
Quote:

 Well, it is a big one for me considering that it took so long to crunch units with my last computer.
 So these are my stats now.
62) nexa1   476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
98) nexa1     97   357 hr 52 min   3 hr 41 min 21.9 sec Mon Apr 5 07:53:19 2004 United States

 And check out ActiveX he's movin too. Whoo hoo!
110) ActiveX   68 291 hr 12 min 4 hr 16 min 57.2 sec Mon Apr 5 02:43:40 2004 United States

 I am not sure what happened to Cross here. He was doing so well, but I guess he had to stop for some reason. If he hadn't he wold have passed me already.
111) Cross   65 202 hr 22 min 3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004 United States

 So anything big going on with the team?
 
Oh hey Nemesis... what is your nations name?




You mean my Nationstates nation?  If so I bet you feel silly now  

At present nothing "big" is going on.  Just a slow steady climb.    Feel free to start something.  Seriously, some of the highest points of activity came when two (or more) people were in a race up the ranks.    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 05, 2004, 05:25:52 pm
My nation is 14th for Compassionate...
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 05, 2004, 05:41:26 pm
Quote:

My nation is 14th for Compassionate...  




"IKV Nemesis is ranked 27th in the region and 116,781st in the world for Most Compassionate Citizens."

 What do you expect of a Klingon?    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 05, 2004, 05:43:12 pm
Oh nothing hehe, Im just a wee widdle nation of not even 30 million...
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: nexa1 on April 05, 2004, 09:33:20 pm

 lol

I just started yesterday. I'm puny  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 07, 2004, 09:25:09 pm
18) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States

20) RazalYllib   4170 4.107 years 8 hr 37 min 37.6 sec Wed Apr 7 16:04:19 2004 United States

21) SGM RAS   4160 6.991 years 14 hr 43 min 16.1 sec Wed Apr 7 18:12:27 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3648 1.610 years 3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004 United States

Finally got my 20 spot back.
My new box helped considerably.
Now how long can I stay?
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 07, 2004, 09:34:06 pm
Well looks like Chilidog will get you in maybe a quarter?
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 07, 2004, 09:45:03 pm
Quote:


 lol

I just started yesterday. I'm puny  




You have to start somewhere.

Persist and you will grow.  Rather like here on the SETI team.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 07, 2004, 09:46:18 pm
Quote:

18) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States

20) RazalYllib   4170 4.107 years 8 hr 37 min 37.6 sec Wed Apr 7 16:04:19 2004 United States

21) SGM RAS   4160 6.991 years 14 hr 43 min 16.1 sec Wed Apr 7 18:12:27 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3648 1.610 years 3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004 United States

Finally got my 20 spot back.
My new box helped considerably.
Now how long can I stay?  




How many work units a day do you produce?  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 08, 2004, 07:16:56 am
never enough...

With my new box,
I churn through approx 10WU every 2.5 days or so,

Wife's (my hand me down),
clunks along with about 5 in the same period of time.
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 09, 2004, 04:51:15 pm
Quote:

never enough...




Funny, but that is how I feel about my output.  I suspect that if I could match Raven I would still be looking for ways to boost it.

Quote:

With my new box,
I churn through approx 10WU every 2.5 days or so,

Wife's (my hand me down),
clunks along with about 5 in the same period of time.  




6/day, more than many others.  Should be enough to keep you in the top 20.  Keep on chugging away.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 09, 2004, 05:40:03 pm
Yeah I know

 just keep swimming, just keep swimming.....


Save my pennies for a new box and up my production is my next goal

 Keep trying to get my associates to install (with my acct) they just stare at me in utter disbelief when I try to explain Seti@Home and distributed computing.

Couple of them saw the screensaver, said it looked pretty, but I told them it goes quicker if you dont see it.
That also got vacent stares then,
If its not pretty, why should this be my screen saver ?

At this point I usually abandon the idea
Title: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 10, 2004, 02:06:06 am
 2) ICE Gambler     50049     42.860 years    7 hr 30 min 06.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 05:21:41 2004    United States  

That will be a nice certificate, one I don't expect to ever reach.      
Title: Re: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: The Postman on April 10, 2004, 08:13:45 am
Right now I am just trying to reach 10,000 before the switch.  I am not too sure how many boxes I will be able to keep online after the switch to BOINC.  
Title: Re: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: Gambler on April 10, 2004, 09:17:38 am
Quote:

 2) ICE Gambler     50049     42.860 years    7 hr 30 min 06.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 05:21:41 2004    United States  

That will be a nice certificate, one I don't expect to ever reach.      




Whoa, I have a confession to make, I've still got SETI running on my farm, but I haven't really been paying attention to it.

This is also a landmark I had never expected to receive.
Title: ActiveX moves into our top 100. Congratulations!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 11, 2004, 12:44:29 am
 100) ActiveX     91    387 hr 27 min    4 hr 15 min 28.3 sec    Sat Apr 10 23:31:06 2004    United States  

Part of the top 100 and soon to be in the triple digits.  Keep it up.  
Title: Re: ActiveX moves into our top 100. Congratulations!
Post by: ActiveX on April 11, 2004, 06:34:38 am
:P
Title: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 11, 2004, 11:25:11 am
Team Stats

Description Taldren, "the Art and Science of Gaming". Creators of "StarFleet Command II : Empires at War" and "Orion Pirates".
Members 138
Results received 165387
Total CPU time 182.040 years
Founder Kenneth Yeast

Top Members:

Name (and URL) Results
received Total CPU time Average CPU time
per work unit Date Last Result Received Country
1) Raven 16736 10.064 years 5 hr 16 min 03.4 sec Fri Jan 17 01:52:39 2003 United States
2) Phillip Showel 16298 16.755 years 9 hr 00 min 19.9 sec Fri Jan 17 01:12:21 2003 United States
3) Cyberkada 15660 7.479 years 4 hr 11 min 01.4 sec Fri Jan 17 00:35:29 2003 United States
4) ICE Gambler 11897 11.143 years 8 hr 12 min 16.3 sec Fri Jan 17 01:46:49 2003 United States
5) Max Peck 8753 6.311 years 6 hr 18 min 59.3 sec Thu Jan 16 23:03:31 2003 Canada
6) Bryan Kinney 4985 3.424 years 6 hr 01 min 01.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:06:50 2003 United States
7) Dragon93 4980 8.292 years 14 hr 35 min 10.0 sec Fri Jan 17 00:20:32 2003 United States
8) Rogue Jedi 4800 5.127 years 9 hr 21 min 27.0 sec Thu Nov 14 17:10:31 2002 United States
9) Mazeppa 4575 6.196 years 11 hr 51 min 49.8 sec Thu Jan 16 23:38:20 2003 United States
10) Sven Forkbeard 4298 6.565 years 13 hr 22 min 46.1 sec Wed Jan 15 23:08:39 2003 United States
11) Noah Wallace 3882 4.842 years 10 hr 55 min 38.6 sec Fri Jan 17 01:08:00 2003 United States
12) Death Merchant 3857 8.847 years 20 hr 05 min 34.4 sec Thu Jan 16 15:13:51 2003 United States
13) moofighters 3829 6.051 years 13 hr 50 min 38.4 sec Fri Jan 17 00:40:23 2003 United States
14) Kenneth Yeast 3636 4.515 years 10 hr 52 min 42.5 sec Fri Jan 17 01:23:42 2003 United States
15) SGM RAS 3340 6.002 years 15 hr 44 min 27.9 sec Thu Jan 16 21:38:48 2003 United States
16) IKV Nemesis  3223 1.686 years 4 hr 34 min 55.9 sec Fri Jan 17 02:00:38 2003 Canada
17) Renegade001 2736 2.911 years 9 hr 19 min 15.6 sec Thu Jan 16 22:24:45 2003 United States
18) KBF-Dogmatix 2470 2.910 years 10 hr 19 min 15.4 sec Thu Jan 16 20:22:56 2003 United States
19) Ronbo 2466 2.036 years 7 hr 13 min 52.2 sec Thu Jan 16 17:36:30 2003 United States
20) Lobo 2282 2.574 years 9 hr 52 min 44.9 sec Thu Jan 16 03:21:08 2003 United States
21) Intrepid-XC 2267 2.329 years 8 hr 59 min 57.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:31:34 2003 United States
22) MagnumMan 2192 4.157 years 16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002 United States
23) Nasim 1872 6865 hr 30 min 3 hr 40 min 02.8 sec Tue Jan 14 13:29:07 2003 Canada
24) JAFO 1852 2.377 years 11 hr 14 min 42.9 sec Mon Jan 6 13:21:52 2003 United States
25) RazalYllib 1835 2.393 years 11 hr 25 min 23.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:47:38 2003 United States
26) Fahrenheit 1776 3.776 years 18 hr 37 min 23.1 sec Fri Jan 17 01:59:46 2003 United States
27) RedHotChiliDog 1713 6559 hr 22 min 3 hr 49 min 45.0 sec Fri Jan 17 01:06:54 2003 United States
28) ChAotiCIllusion 1575 7350 hr 10 min 4 hr 40 min 00.4 sec Thu Jan 16 19:57:48 2003 United Kingdom
29) Jim 1333 1.256 years 8 hr 15 min 06.6 sec Thu Jan 16 23:15:37 2003 United States
30) hobbesmaster 1274 1.021 years 7 hr 01 min 15.4 sec Wed Jan 15 05:17:23 2003 United States
31) Edge10 1101 1.678 years 13 hr 21 min 01.5 sec Thu Jan 16 21:04:58 2003 United States
32) jualdeaux 1003 7938 hr 10 min 7 hr 54 min 51.9 sec Mon Jan 13 03:42:37 2003 United States
33) Bill Castner 913 7477 hr 25 min 8 hr 11 min 23.8 sec Thu Jan 16 21:15:20 2003 United States
34) Aldaron 911 1.289 years 12 hr 23 min 41.1 sec Wed Jan 15 04:18:40 2003 United States
35) John Cencerik 896 1.858 years 18 hr 10 min 11.0 sec Thu Jan 16 11:27:20 2003 United States
36) Zach 870 1.083 years 10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002 United States
37) Michal 753 1.542 years 17 hr 56 min -0.0 sec Thu Jan 9 03:58:14 2003 United States
38) Erik Bethke 746 7244 hr 23 min 9 hr 42 min 39.5 sec Fri Jan 10 01:57:07 2003 United States
39) anarwally 729 2.195 years 26 hr 22 min 16.6 sec Thu Jan 16 12:03:15 2003 United States
40) bupson 710 7851 hr 23 min 11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002 United States
41) Corben Dallas 671 6593 hr 41 min 9 hr 49 min 35.9 sec Thu Jan 16 23:11:49 2003 United States
42) Iceman 667 5988 hr 09 min 8 hr 58 min 39.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:34:12 2003 United States
43) Xeir 645 1.283 years 17 hr 25 min 09.4 sec Fri Jan 17 01:52:28 2003 United States
44) f9TH SIR X 597 5833 hr 42 min 9 hr 46 min 18.1 sec Thu Jan 16 21:42:23 2003 New Zealand
45) AJTK 582 7085 hr 39 min 12 hr 10 min 28.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:03:48 2003 United States
46) Michael Malin 575 1.819 years 27 hr 42 min 26.9 sec Thu Jan 16 18:55:58 2003 United States
47) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids 491 1.538 years 27 hr 25 min 58.2 sec Thu Jan 16 05:02:10 2003 United States
48) Sethan 490 5083 hr 54 min 10 hr 22 min 31.1 sec Thu Jan 16 22:44:25 2003 United States
49) nexa1 476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
50) Reffet 451 5520 hr 42 min 12 hr 14 min 27.7 sec Thu Jan 16 09:21:27 2003 United States
51) hawkmoon 444 2342 hr 16 min 5 hr 16 min 31.4 sec Fri Nov 1 22:17:46 2002 Netherlands
52) Speaker to Aliens 419 7073 hr 10 min 16 hr 52 min 51.8 sec Fri Jul 26 20:36:29 2002 United Kingdom
53) Ed Lacabanne 418 5781 hr 12 min 13 hr 49 min 50.2 sec Thu Jan 16 21:10:18 2003 United States
54) hawkeye 400 2915 hr 47 min 7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002 United States
55) Kor 373 2212 hr 20 min 5 hr 55 min 52.3 sec Fri Nov 15 08:13:53 2002 United States
56) Hollis J. Wood 371 5365 hr 55 min 14 hr 27 min 48.2 sec Thu Jan 16 18:14:51 2003 Canada
57) Harlequin 370 2234 hr 04 min 6 hr 02 min 16.8 sec Wed Jan 15 20:57:16 2003 United Kingdom
58) BobGraham 360 1836 hr 57 min 5 hr 06 min 09.5 sec Fri Jan 17 00:00:19 2003 United States
59) Mark P. 325 4350 hr 40 min 13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002 United States
60) Tanked_Up 318 3973 hr 32 min 12 hr 29 min 43.4 sec Mon Jan 13 18:26:05 2003 United Kingdom
61) Lancer of TAC 297 4498 hr 56 min 15 hr 08 min 52.6 sec Mon Dec 30 20:36:23 2002 United States
62) Spectre 295 4819 hr 05 min 16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002 United States
63) Rick Regan 269 3378 hr 00 min 12 hr 33 min 27.5 sec Wed Oct 30 19:08:54 2002 United States
64) TalonClaw 253 6880 hr 03 min 27 hr 11 min 38.0 sec Thu Jan 16 21:38:50 2003 United States
65) Grith 195 3451 hr 48 min 17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002 United States
66) Daniel 194 2871 hr 16 min 14 hr 48 min 01.3 sec Thu Jan 16 21:19:32 2003 United States
67) Grimklink 193 6281 hr 54 min 32 hr 32 min 55.5 sec Wed Jan 15 21:49:39 2003 United States
68) David T. Potter 187 1.652 years 77 hr 23 min 14.1 sec Wed Jan 15 06:09:28 2003 United States
69) Traigus 161 3291 hr 59 min 20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002 United States
70) Professional 157 4502 hr 15 min 28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002 Canada
71) Patgod 157 1770 hr 51 min 11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002 United States
72) jimmythehat 153 1570 hr 52 min 10 hr 16 min 01.6 sec Mon Dec 30 14:27:27 2002 United States
73) Alien 3490 147 2758 hr 23 min 18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999 United States
74) Captain_Krenn 120 2044 hr 35 min 17 hr 02 min 17.9 sec Thu Jan 16 16:02:37 2003 United States
75) Grin 117 2341 hr 01 min 20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002 United States
76) Durin 116 1458 hr 04 min 12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002 United States
77) SPQR Kremen 116 879 hr 49 min 7 hr 35 min 04.8 sec Fri Jan 10 03:14:22 2003 Australia
78) DaewAnahos 105 1084 hr 52 min 10 hr 19 min 55.7 sec Thu Jan 16 12:47:15 2003 United States
79) Matolck 91 1736 hr 37 min 19 hr 05 min 01.8 sec Sun Apr 7 07:08:41 2002 France
80) NMZmaster 88 2229 hr 37 min 25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002 United States
81) Tx PnGwin 82 2552 hr 14 min 31 hr 07 min 29.7 sec Sun Jan 12 03:34:16 2003 United States
82) Towelie 80 962 hr 41 min 12 hr 02 min 01.1 sec Wed Dec 4 11:33:40 2002 United States
83) Redshift 79 856 hr 42 min 10 hr 50 min 39.8 sec Thu Sep 5 22:57:02 2002 United Kingdom
84) Orthae 78 1130 hr 47 min 14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002 United States
85) Kevin Luker 78 1138 hr 40 min 14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002 United States
86) Sakrot 71 1377 hr 44 min 19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002 United States
87) JoeRad 62 882 hr 15 min 14 hr 13 min 47.7 sec Wed Jan 8 14:11:29 2003 United States
88) Mentat Jon 62 1315 hr 01 min 21 hr 12 min 36.5 sec Fri Jan 17 01:11:10 2003 United States
89) sirgod 48 772 hr 06 min 16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002 United States
90) sfcjb 47 280 hr 02 min 5 hr 57 min 30.0 sec Thu Jan 16 20:59:42 2003 United States
91) PsychadelicSwinger 45 986 hr 55 min 21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002 United States
92) Toasty0 45 500 hr 26 min 11 hr 07 min 15.3 sec Thu Jan 16 23:58:45 2003 United States
93) Erik Bethke 43 1847 hr 42 min 42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999 United States
94) GreenLantern 43 787 hr 57 min 18 hr 19 min 29.1 sec Thu Jan 16 18:59:22 2003 United States
95) TerranceRoff 41 847 hr 06 min 20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002 United States
96) 3dot14 39 1313 hr 02 min 33 hr 40 min 03.4 sec Sat Dec 14 15:40:10 2002 Canada
97) The Postman 39 277 hr 36 min 7 hr 07 min 04.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:56:30 2003 United States
98) Tantalus 37 692 hr 35 min 18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002 United Kingdom
99) EE 32 652 hr 46 min 20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002 United States
100) Tim 31 1858 hr 34 min 59 hr 57 min 15.1 sec Wed Jan 15 05:00:12 2003 United States
101) Alien 3491 30 1876 hr 11 min 62 hr 32 min 23.9 sec Sun Nov 28 04:26:13 1999 United States
102) Overloaded Ferrets 29 1138 hr 16 min 39 hr 15 min 02.9 sec Wed Jan 15 12:29:01 2003 United States
103) pneumonic81 25 846 hr 53 min 33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002 United States
104) clintk 25 267 hr 31 min 10 hr 42 min 03.2 sec Mon Jan 13 17:13:31 2003 United Kingdom
105) FMMonty 23 355 hr 17 min 15 hr 26 min 51.5 sec Fri Jan 25 17:29:26 2002 United Kingdom
106) Otenki 23 172 hr 21 min 7 hr 29 min 37.9 sec Sun Jul 7 14:39:08 2002 Canada
107) 5of12 19 128 hr 53 min 6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001 United States
108) FPF-DarkElf 16 861 hr 43 min 53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002 United States
109) SFCSpoonman 16 149 hr 12 min 9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002 United States
110) Robert J Hendry Jr 12 259 hr 45 min 21 hr 38 min 45.7 sec Sun Jun 23 00:22:15 2002 United States
111) Hilton 10 506 hr 01 min 50 hr 36 min 10.9 sec Sat Aug 3 23:54:41 2002 United States
112) BlackJackal 9 698 hr 59 min 77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002 United States
113) Baron Jukaga 8 277 hr 45 min 34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002 Canada
114) MazeppaTest1 8 163 hr 38 min 20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002 United States
115) Jester_Taldren 7 243 hr 32 min 34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001 United States
116) pj lynn 6 234 hr 06 min 39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001 United States
117) Lairis 6 62 hr 52 min 10 hr 28 min 41.7 sec Fri Aug 23 05:54:28 2002 United States
118) Jinxx 5 328 hr 16 min 65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001 United States
119) Obmanta 5 178 hr 47 min 35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002 United States
120) Chili_of_Borg 5 62 hr 53 min 12 hr 34 min 46.3 sec Thu Jan 16 21:55:17 2003 United States
121) Bolitho 4 183 hr 32 min 45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001 United States
122) Catnip_inc 4 353 hr 41 min 88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002 United States
123) GolferDJ 4 89 hr 47 min 22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002 United States
124) Kirk_jr 3 128 hr 22 min 42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000 United States
125) MindBlip 3 39 hr 40 min 13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001 United States
126) Joshua Babb 3 211 hr 29 min 70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001 United States
127) Beanardo 2 30 hr 49 min 15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001 United States
128) GFL-I-Demandred 2 64 hr 46 min 32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002 United Kingdom
129) ArticFire 2 16 hr 25 min 8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002 United States
130) Speaker to Aliens 1 29 hr 40 min 29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999 United Kingdom
131) SKINWALKER 1 61 hr 15 min 61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001 United States
132) Wulgaru 1 9 hr 44 min 9 hr 44 min 58.8 sec Sun Dec 16 18:47:40 2001 Canada
     
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 11, 2004, 08:46:21 pm
You had to dig to find that list. I was in the 97th spot with 39 WU's completed. I have come a long way since then.  
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: GE-Raven on April 12, 2004, 08:03:54 am
Congrats Gambler on the 50K mark... Very cool!!!

And wow that list is blast from the past.  16K units... When I was at "full steam" that would take me about 6 weeks.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: ActiveX on April 12, 2004, 04:58:44 pm
When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 12, 2004, 05:10:10 pm
Quote:

When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'  




The server is down and I can't check the individual stats either. It's them.  
Title: That was then this is now. :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 12, 2004, 07:09:45 pm
Quote:

Quote:

When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'  




The server is down and I can't check the individual stats either. It's them.  




Taldren
Last updated: Mon Apr 12 17:06:11 2004 UTC

Description   Taldren, "the Art and Science of Gaming". Creators of "StarFleet Command II : Empires at War" and "Orion Pirates".
Members   169, Results received   573485, Total CPU time   443.920 years
Founder   Kenneth Yeast

Top Members:
Name (and URL)    Results received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     261969    155.111 years    5 hr 11 min 12.3 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:44:52 2004    United States
2) ICE Gambler     50186    42.953 years    7 hr 29 min 50.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 08:25:43 2004    United States
3) Phillip Showel     31712    27.663 years    7 hr 38 min 29.7 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:48:36 2004    United States
4) Dragon93     22711    30.676 years    11 hr 49 min 56.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:16:10 2004    United States
5) IKV Nemesis     17578    7.472 years    3 hr 43 min 24.5 sec    Tue Apr 13 00:04:58 2004    Canada
6) Max Peck     14818    8.932 years    5 hr 16 min 49.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:32:25 2004    Canada
7) KD4     10321    5.496 years    4 hr 39 min 52.2 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:03:45 2004    United States
8) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
9) Dizzy is Still a Snot     9192    11.552 years    11 hr 00 min 31.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:17:45 2004    United States
10) Kenneth Yeast     8954    7.343 years    7 hr 11 min 01.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:20:45 2004    United States
11) Noah Wallace III    8651    7.531 years    7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec    Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004    United States
12) ChAotiCIllusion     7893    3.010 years    3 hr 20 min 25.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 14:52:41 2004    United Kingdom
13) Nasim    7402    3.019 years    3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec    Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003    Canada
14) The Postman     5924    3.468 years    5 hr 07 min 42.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:54:26 2004    United States
15) KBF-Dogmatix     5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
16) Intrepid-XC     5443    4.742 years    7 hr 37 min 51.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 05:33:25 2004    United States
17) Sven Forkbeard     4948    7.257 years    12 hr 50 min 53.7 sec    Sun Mar 28 16:19:15 2004    United States
18) Fahrenheit    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
19) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
20) RazalYllib     4218    4.131 years    8 hr 34 min 41.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:49:39 2004    United States
21) SGM RAS     4174    7.005 years    14 hr 42 min 04.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:18:06 2004    United States
22) RedHotChiliDog    3648    1.610 years    3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec    Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004    United States
23) Bill Castner     3461    2.365 years    5 hr 59 min 13.1 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:00:40 2004    United States
24) Ronbo     3394    2.738 years    7 hr 03 min 58.2 sec    Sun Apr 11 23:23:46 2004    United States
25) f9TH SIR X     3366    2.618 years    6 hr 48 min 44.5 sec    Sun Apr 11 21:12:14 2004    New Zealand
26) digi    3311    1.355 years    3 hr 35 min 04.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:17:55 2004    United Kingdom
27) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
28) Jim     3015    2.399 years    6 hr 58 min 08.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:39:30 2004    United States
29) hobbesmaster     2689    1.645 years    5 hr 21 min 29.2 sec    Tue Apr 6 10:14:39 2004    United States
30) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
31) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
32) Reffet     2128    1.602 years    6 hr 35 min 44.7 sec    Tue Mar 23 00:51:11 2004    United States
33) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
34) BobGraham     1910    1.201 years    5 hr 30 min 37.5 sec    Mon Apr 12 04:19:58 2004    United States
35) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
36) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
37) Hollis J. Wood    1750    1.367 years    6 hr 50 min 31.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 19:30:56 2004    Canada
38) Malystryx_XC     1430    1.600 years    9 hr 48 min 05.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 02:35:14 2004    United States
39) Xeir     1274    2.502 years    17 hr 12 min 23.3 sec    Sun Apr 11 17:23:08 2004    United States
40) lapt    1246    1.202 years    8 hr 27 min 04.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:08:09 2004    United States
41) Iceman     1238    1.218 years    8 hr 37 min 10.0 sec    Mon Oct 27 05:14:57 2003    United States
42) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
43) Kroma BaSyl    1129    5548 hr 26 min    4 hr 54 min 52.1 sec    Sat Oct 11 14:26:50 2003    United States
44) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
45) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
46) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
47) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
48) AJTK     856    1.146 years    11 hr 43 min 54.6 sec    Sun Apr 11 01:41:52 2004    United States
49) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
50) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
51) Daniel     706    1.210 years    15 hr 00 min 33.5 sec    Fri Apr 9 15:48:52 2004    United States
52) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
53) davezzzz    697    8189 hr 54 min    11 hr 45 min 00.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:19:58 2004    United States
54) Harlequin     621    4614 hr 18 min    7 hr 25 min 49.5 sec    Wed Oct 1 19:41:36 2003    United Kingdom
55) thirdleg     602    2763 hr 41 min    4 hr 35 min 27.0 sec    Mon Apr 5 03:36:56 2004    United States
56) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
57) TalonClaw     580    1.464 years    22 hr 06 min 14.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 13:48:42 2004    United States
58) Toasty0    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
59) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids     546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
60) Ogma     505    6276 hr 36 min    12 hr 25 min 44.1 sec    Wed Mar 31 01:08:12 2004    United States
61) Speaker to Aliens     500    8402 hr 09 min    16 hr 48 min 15.5 sec    Sun Dec 7 01:05:53 2003    United Kingdom
62) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
63) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
64) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
65) Towelie     406    4316 hr 02 min    10 hr 37 min 50.2 sec    Sat Feb 28 04:30:36 2004    United States
66) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
67) Tanked_Up     397    4973 hr 51 min    12 hr 31 min 42.9 sec    Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2003    United Kingdom
68) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
69) Lancer of TAC     312    4683 hr 08 min    15 hr 00 min 36.2 sec    Fri Mar 26 18:26:57 2004    United States
70) Spectre     295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
71) Captain_Krenn     289    4610 hr 43 min    15 hr 57 min 14.6 sec    Fri Apr 9 17:07:57 2004    United States
72) awm3     288    2515 hr 47 min    8 hr 44 min 07.3 sec    Sat Mar 27 03:26:17 2004    Canada
73) Grimklink     285    1.063 years    32 hr 40 min 29.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:21:54 2004    United States
74) SPQR Kremen     283    1729 hr 40 min    6 hr 06 min 42.8 sec    Sat Apr 10 01:07:27 2004    Australia
75) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
76) Rick Regan     278    3475 hr 08 min    12 hr 30 min 01.7 sec    Thu Jan 23 18:57:39 2003    United States
77) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
78) TAG-Draco     207    1924 hr 12 min    9 hr 17 min 44.5 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:00:12 2004    United States
79) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
80) Otenki     184    1072 hr 48 min    5 hr 49 min 49.7 sec    Sun Nov 23 14:10:42 2003    Canada
81) jimmythehat    183    1930 hr 48 min    10 hr 33 min 02.9 sec    Mon Dec 29 05:10:33 2003    United States
82) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
83) Max     173    2699 hr 59 min    15 hr 36 min 24.7 sec    Mon Apr 12 17:26:52 2004    United Kingdom
84) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
85) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
86) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
87) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
88) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
89) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
90) Chrisr118     146    839 hr 57 min    5 hr 45 min 11.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:57:43 2004    Canada
91) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
92) nexa1     136    497 hr 23 min    3 hr 39 min 26.2 sec    Mon Apr 12 19:39:11 2004    United States
93) keravnos     123    2092 hr 30 min    17 hr 00 min 43.9 sec    Wed Apr 7 07:16:39 2004    Greece
94) Matsukasi     121    6657 hr 04 min    55 hr 01 min 01.7 sec    Wed Apr 7 11:09:53 2004    United States
95) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
96) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
97) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
98) clintk     101    951 hr 59 min    9 hr 25 min 32.3 sec    Thu Apr 8 10:45:55 2004    United Kingdom
99) ActiveX     96    408 hr 22 min    4 hr 15 min 14.3 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:19:18 2004    United States
100) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
101) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
102) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
103) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
104) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
105) Lairis     80    887 hr 53 min    11 hr 05 min 55.0 sec    Sun Apr 11 17:53:28 2004    United States
106) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
107) Orthae     78    1130 hr 47 min    14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec    Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002    United States
108) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
109) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
110) Sakrot     71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
111) Cross     65    202 hr 22 min    3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec    Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004    United States
112) Rob     62    1433 hr 05 min    23 hr 06 min 52.0 sec    Thu Oct 2 05:12:26 2003    United States
113) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
114) Apocolypse     52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
115) GreenLantern    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
116) sirgod     48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
117) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
118) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
119) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
120) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
121) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
122) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
123) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
124) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
125) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
126) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
127) F9thTheJudge     25    931 hr 15 min    37 hr 15 min 01.9 sec    Wed Mar 31 17:20:06 2004    United States
128) Tus     24    912 hr 22 min    38 hr 00 min 56.5 sec    Mon Aug 18 16:21:37 2003    United States
129) Hilton     20    670 hr 50 min    33 hr 32 min 31.2 sec    Wed Apr 7 23:23:10 2004    United States
130) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
131)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
132) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
133) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
134) SFCSpoonman     16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
135) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
136) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
137) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
138) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
139) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
140) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
141) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
142) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
143) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
144) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
145) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
146) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
147) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
148) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
149) FRA_C_Blade_XC     4    31 hr 48 min    7 hr 57 min 01.0 sec    Fri Mar 19 03:22:30 2004    United States
150) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
151) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
152) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
153) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
154) Beanardo     2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
155) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
156) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
157) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
158) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
159) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
160) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States    
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 12, 2004, 07:21:03 pm
Quote:

Congrats Gambler on the 50K mark... Very cool!!!

And wow that list is blast from the past.  16K units... When I was at "full steam" that would take me about 6 weeks.

GE-Raven
   




I AM at full speed.  It would take roughly 54 weeks.  I have less steam than you.    
Title: Team Mexico
Post by: The Postman on April 14, 2004, 05:26:00 pm
From 4/3 to 4/11 Taldren averaged a daily output of 666.9 work units.
Team Mexico averaged 744.3 in the same time frame.

We need to find some more Work units from somewhere.  
Title: Re: Team Mexico
Post by: digi on April 15, 2004, 05:21:07 pm
Finally made the top 25 (hopefully I'll stay there).  My new work machine is adding beautifully to my output!

Results Received  3387
Total CPU Time  1.390 years  
Average CPU Time per work unit  3 hr 35 min 43.7 sec  
Average results received per day  8.59  
Your rank out of 4960424 total users is:  73802nd place.  
The number of users who have this rank:  29  
You have completed more work units than  98.512% of our users.

On a side note, I'll be upgrading my home 2.53Ghz to a 3Ghz this weekend.  Hopefully that'll add a few more units that we need to have to beat the Mexico Team.
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: nexa1 on April 16, 2004, 04:52:25 am
 Hey there...
 I got permission to use 3 computers for a little while. They are slow p3 550MHz. But every little bit helps. I have them set up just like the faq says so hopefully it will be a low maintenance deal. lol.
 I am curious to see how bad my times get.
 Anyone have a suggestion onn how to make the relics kick em out quicker?
 
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 16, 2004, 05:46:02 am
Every bit helps  
Title: WUs acquired from somewhere.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 16, 2004, 07:46:05 pm
Quote:

From 4/3 to 4/11 Taldren averaged a daily output of 666.9 work units.
Team Mexico averaged 744.3 in the same time frame.

We need to find some more Work units from somewhere.  




Description   Taldren,
Members   170
Results received   777684
Total CPU time   544.245 years  
 

Mexico Team
Members   124
Results received   599345
Total CPU time   652.616 years  
 

Anyone know who Putanginamo is?

2) Putanginamo    201013     98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines      

To answer my own question it is Cyberkada.
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 17, 2004, 11:25:03 pm
 104) Taldren   170   778859    544.873 years   6 hr 07 min 41.8 sec  

134) Mexico Team   124   600191   653.169 years   9 hr 31 min 59.6 sec  

So long as Cyber stays on the team we have the goal accomplished.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 18, 2004, 06:31:13 am
Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 18, 2004, 08:29:58 am
That is what we need is for them 2 to go at it. I don't even know how many WU a day they do.


 On a side note... if I did my math right, I should over take my old nexa1 (#63) spot before June. Does that sound right?
I am thinking that 2 of the P3 are crunching a unit every 9 hours and the 3rd id crunching one every 13 hours. My P4 2.6 does a unit every 3 hrs 40 min.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 18, 2004, 08:43:56 am
Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: DreadlordGW on April 18, 2004, 09:10:57 am
Quote:

Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  




Cyber moved on to BOINC
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 18, 2004, 02:00:58 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  




Oops
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: The Postman on April 18, 2004, 06:43:31 pm
BOINC is running? When are we supposed to switch over?  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 18, 2004, 09:19:31 pm
Quote:

BOINC is running? When are we supposed to switch over?  




Still in testing.  No date for the switch.  

 
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Erik Bethke on April 19, 2004, 12:02:19 pm
Wow that is totally awesome guys!!!!

We are in the top 100 in the world.  That is a truly amazing accomplishement.

Really could anyone here imagine it?  Top 100.

okay so for what are we doing in Korea.  This is to be considered confidential and not released to the public, just for you SETI guys...

I am leading a all Korean team plus one American - Nate Simpson from CA to create a new massively multiplayer game based on the kung-fu literature of China.  This is a huge body of fiction going back a thousand years and lead in the modern era by Louis Cha.

If you take a look at my website  www.erikbethke.com  you will find some book reviews there.  Take a look at the Deer and the Cauldron.

It is great working here in Korea, the atmosphere is differently paced, weather interesting and the people are cool.

The three areas of principle focus for our new game are:
Robust dynamic gameplay systems to reduce the reliance on static content
Very deep service
Advanced utilization of social network graphs for extremely neat tricks to have the server aware of the players' experience and adjust the gameplay on the fly to make it more of a partyl!

also as we said earlier B9 is on hold - more practically we and MJ have decided that we need some space.  I will leave it at that for now...

Awesome guys!
-Erik
   
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: GE-Raven on April 19, 2004, 03:02:57 pm
You are and continue to be... "The Best"  Erik.

Thanks for the bone.  

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Age on April 19, 2004, 06:13:44 pm
   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 19, 2004, 08:46:54 pm
Quote:

   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  




Link to team stats

Link to SETI @ Home home page  

Click the links for the information.  Then you don't have to believe anyone.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 20, 2004, 02:43:53 am

  I think of the SETI team as our own little group, in the Taldren family, working on a common goal together  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 20, 2004, 06:19:55 am
Its not a typical Korean MMORPG is it?
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 21, 2004, 08:55:58 am
 Well, I should take #78 in about 12 hours and #77 by this weekend.
79) nexa1   231 1041 hr 05 min 4 hr 30 min 24.8 sec Wed Apr 21 13:50:18 2004 United States

 Man my times sure went up with these P3 being added
Title: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: Dragon93 on April 29, 2004, 06:52:19 pm
I'm still alive. Still crunching WUs...

Just Crazy busy to the point that forum participation is among my absolute lowest priorities.

Anyway, just wanted to drop in and say Hi to let everyone know I haven't been lost in space or anything of the sort.

Good to see all the old familiar names, etc. I'll check in again in a few months...  
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 29, 2004, 07:19:54 pm
Quote:

I'm still alive. Still crunching WUs...

Just Crazy busy to the point that forum participation is among my absolute lowest priorities.

Anyway, just wanted to drop in and say Hi to let everyone know I haven't been lost in space or anything of the sort.

Good to see all the old familiar names, etc. I'll check in again in a few months...  




I have been watching you .  You seem to oscillate between 5000 and 5200 ahead of me.   I can't get closer than 5000 and you can't seem to pull ahead by more than 5200.  Unless you change things that will hold until sometime in May when I give away one of my computers and lose ~20% of my output .  Keep on pushing them out.    
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: Dragon93 on April 29, 2004, 07:24:21 pm
Quote:

I have been watching you .




Oh you have, have you?

I barely have time to even think about it much these days. My job wasn't keeping me busy enough so I started organizing a large music festival for next year and I am about to take on a few consulting gigs on the side.

Sleep is also a low priority for me...
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 01, 2004, 01:24:42 pm
Quote:

Sleep is also a low priority for me...  




Sounds very familiar.  

I have achieved 2 more goals.  Top 7500 and 99.85%.  Next goals top 5000 and 99.875%.  (Even .001% gains are hard for me now)

Your rank out of 4978530 total users is:    7490th place.

You have completed more work units than    99.850% of our users.  
Title: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 07, 2004, 10:21:02 am
Is anybody else having problems loading the team page or your individual page?  I am getting 500 errors on both and I have no idea if all of my machines are running.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: nexa1 on May 07, 2004, 02:17:06 pm

 Yeah for some reason for me it takes 3-4 times trying to load to actually get it. Don't know why tho.
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: AJTK on May 10, 2004, 06:41:13 pm
Although I will never get anywhere close to you boys with hardware like Dragon and Nemesis, I have added a P4-2.8 laptop to my inventory and it cranks out one wu about every 4-6 hours, not sure why there is such a large variation. Anyhow, I have FINALLY gotten myself away from the dirt eater on the list and am making progress at moving ahead of some of the mid level peeps who no longer are putting out new units.

Hoping to build a new P4-3.06/800mhz desktop in the near future, so that will also help my unit speed greatly if I can scrape the cash together. Wow, Taldren in the top 100 in the WORLD?!

Are we Trek geeks commited, or what? ROFL!

Oh yeah, Im still alive it would appear. Divorces suck.

Have a nice day!
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 10, 2004, 06:55:42 pm
Quote:

Although I will never get anywhere close to you boys with hardware like Dragon and Nemesis, I have added a P4-2.8 laptop to my inventory and it cranks out one wu about every 4-6 hours, not sure why there is such a large variation. Anyhow, I have FINALLY gotten myself away from the dirt eater on the list and am making progress at moving ahead of some of the mid level peeps who no longer are putting out new units.

Hoping to build a new P4-3.06/800mhz desktop in the near future, so that will also help my unit speed greatly if I can scrape the cash together. Wow, Taldren in the top 100 in the WORLD?!

Are we Trek geeks commited, or what? ROFL!

Oh yeah, Im still alive it would appear. Divorces suck.

Have a nice day!  




Are the P4s hyperthreading enabled?  (and is you OS as well?)  If so using the CLI you can run two copies at once and increase your total output (how much I can't say, but some people claim very substantial boosts).  In any case using the CLI compared to the screen saver is a minimum 10% boost, but you've probably heard that berfore (and are possibly using the CLI ).

I never anticipated getting in the top 10 when I joined.  Being in the upper half of Taldren was all I expected.  Doing 10,000 WUs seemed like a fantasy not reality.  But things happen and next thing  you know you are a contender.  All I can say is that  The Great Moo Hunt!  got out of control.  

 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: AJTK on May 10, 2004, 11:03:28 pm
using the CLI (at your instruction, lol) on the ol p3-750, using screen saver only on laptop at the moment. i need to dload the CLI and set it up again. I THINK this laptop is HT, but I am not positive. If I had to guess, I think it is, but Id have to look in the documentation to be sure. a 2.8, i think it has to be, doesnt it? 2.8 was next to last 533mhz, then the 3.0 went from 533 to 800 and they made others that were 800 that were slower. I am sure this is a 533 board tho. hmmm,  tried to find info on the motherboard/chipset in system, to no avail. OFW, its a 2.8, thats good enough for now, rofl. the cli runs faster on my 750, so it sure as hell will run faster on this thing, lol. Id appreciate if you would post the instrucitons on how to set up the cli again, and i will install it monyana.

Have a nice day!
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 11, 2004, 06:44:05 pm
Quote:

 Id appreciate if you would post the instrucitons on how to set up the cli again, and i will install it monyana.

Have a nice day!
   




There is a stickied thread with the instructions.  But here is a link to make it easier.  There is also a link in my signature.

Keep pumping them out.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: digi on May 12, 2004, 03:21:14 am
Quote:

Is anybody else having problems loading the team page or your individual page?  I am getting 500 errors on both and I have no idea if all of my machines are running.  




Same here.....The one I use which seems to keep completly uptodate with any new units posted is dead.  Anyone got an uptodate link that works?
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 12, 2004, 03:42:16 am
The links do seem to be having trouble.

They seem to have partially revised the links without posting much info about it.  This link is working better for me.  It is far from perfect but is better.  It also seems to be dependent somewhat on the time of day. Team page

Code:
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu



Note the addition of the 2 compared to older links that you may be using.    
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: digi on May 12, 2004, 04:08:17 am
It doesn't appear to be working for me right now, but I'll keep giving it a try.  Thanks Nem.
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 12, 2004, 05:10:28 am
No that link does not work. I also can't check my stats on the individual page either. The only page that I can get is the once a day team page.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: GE-Raven on May 12, 2004, 04:24:36 pm
You should soon notice an upswing in production.  I expect to be at about double in a day or so.  I hope to eclipse 1K WU per day at some point this summer.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 12, 2004, 04:59:53 pm
Quote:

You should soon notice an upswing in production.  I expect to be at about double in a day or so.  I hope to eclipse 1K WU per day at some point this summer.

GE-Raven
   




There goes my chance for catching you  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: ActiveX on May 13, 2004, 08:02:08 am
My WUs have dropped a lot since I've been playing Eve...

But I hope to add an 8 Opteron (dual core) powerhouse to my arsenal...
Title: Re: page loading problem:OUTAGE NOTICE:
Post by: The Postman on May 13, 2004, 01:47:58 pm
 
Quote:

 May 12, 2004
OUTAGE NOTICE: On Monday, May 17th we are going to have a two-hour web site outage starting at 17:00 UTC. Client downloads, statistical pages, etc. will be off-line during this time.
 


 
Title: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 16, 2004, 06:17:41 pm
Go to the following link scroll down to #48 in the USA and you will see our very own:

48) Raven     275878     163.049 years    5 hr 10 min 38.3 sec    Sun May 16 00:49:35 2004    United States
 
Way down at #639 but still among the top 1000 in the U.S.:

639) ICE Gambler     52150     44.339 years    7 hr 26 min 52.4 sec    Sat May 15 08:42:16 2004    United States

If you go to this link instead you will see him at #113 in the WORLD:

113) Raven     275480     162.829 years    5 hr 10 min 40.0 sec    Fri May 14 16:44:36 2004    United States

Much lower down but still in the top 200 is Putanginamao (aka Cyberkada/Carlosbott)

196) Putanginamo    201013     98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines

When I noticed these I could not resist giving you guys a little pat on the back (please ignore the kickme signs left behind ).  Way to go guys. You are the big boys that drag the team up into being among the best in the world.     None of the rest of us make the top 1000 in the world.  No one else makes the top 1000 in the U.S. (or would if they were American.)  
Title: Re: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: DreadlordGW on May 17, 2004, 12:07:49 am
If i still had use to our computer farms i'd be right up around Gambler - but cant run it as Seti slowed critical app down.
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Age on May 22, 2004, 03:56:16 am
Quote:

Quote:

   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  




Link to team stats

Link to SETI @ Home home page  

Click the links for the information.  Then you don't have to believe anyone.  


I guess I was wrong and sorry to everyone in the Seti team and for clearing this up for me Nemesis.It really is the search for ET.I have been more into Astonomy and looking at the stars.What is required to do a seti search?I thought it had something to do with the game.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 09:09:17 am
Quote:

I guess I was wrong and sorry to everyone in the Seti team and for clearing this up for me Nemesis.It really is the search for ET.I have been more into Astonomy and looking at the stars.What is required to do a seti search?I thought it had something to do with the game.  




Go to this thread it walks you through setting up the Seti command line client with the SETIDriver program to control uploads and downloads.  
Title: Re: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 09:34:04 am
Quote:

If i still had use to our computer farms i'd be right up around Gambler - but cant run it as Seti slowed critical app down.  




In our team's history you have a unique place.  

The statistics that you kept for so long encouraged people to work hard to keep up their averages.  Others made efforts to output more just to qualify for your stats list.  Your stats listing can probably be credited with causing 10's of thousands of WUS to be output for the team.  

Likely the output the you "provoked" with your statistics is greater than your own personal stats.   Your contribution is far greater than the measured stats.    
Title: A link from the birth of SETI @ Home
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 10:34:21 am
Link to story

Limited and edited quote below.
Quote:


The average Intel box takes an average of 35 hours to analyse each chunk of data, ...

the PowerPC which handles the Dalek data in a mere 23 hours, ...

SunSPARC which analyses the alien artefacts in just 16 Earth hours. ...

Alphas (from the dead planet Digitalia) take a mere ten galactic time units...

PA Risc systems have been sent more than 3000 batches of data, none of which have returned. ...

RS/6000s (lots of them in use in semi-detached houses in the Neasden area, no doubt) have been sent 4000 bundles of alien transmissions, but none have come back. ...

MIPS processors have gobbled up over 10,000 sets of data to no discernable effect...

680x0-based system has also failed to calculate anything....

an 'unknown' CPU which has received one load of data to which there has been no reply.


 
Title: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 24, 2004, 11:08:16 pm
Your rank out of 5006181 total users is:    7192nd place

and almost 5 million are behind me.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 29, 2004, 08:18:43 am
Brag, Brag, Brag!  

I may only have one lil 2.8 laptop now, but it pumps one out about every 4-6 hours, causing my avg wu per day to go up about 5% in a month, and has dropped my average time approx 20 minutes in that same month. I wonder if I should have my old 733 STOP doing wu's, as it actually hurts my averages? It takes anywhere from 11 (RARE) to 30 (not quite as rare) hours to turn one out, with the avg being around 19 or so. It is amazing how much faster a new pc will churn these things out. Ive done almost a hundred units in the last month. Of course, I saw where Raven said he was gonna top 1 THOUSAND a freaking DAY later this summer, but for this mere mortal, 100 a month is pretty good, lol!

BTW, Raven is at #46 on the home users list now! Congrats.

Have a nice day!    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 29, 2004, 11:08:32 am
Quote:

Brag, Brag, Brag!  

I may only have one lil 2.8 laptop now, but it pumps one out about every 4-6 hours, causing my avg wu per day to go up about 5% in a month, and has dropped my average time approx 20 minutes in that same month.




Unless that is a Celeron laptop or you are using the screensaver it should be faster than that.  I would expect under 3 hours for a P4 (non celeron).  A well configured screen saver should add no more than 20% to that number.  

If you are using the screensaver minimize the time displaying the graphics, they take about 90% of the processing time when running.

A 2.8 P4 COULD have hyperthreading, which while it would hurt your average time should improve your daily output.

Quote:

I wonder if I should have my old 733 STOP doing wu's, as it actually hurts my averages? It takes anywhere from 11 (RARE) to 30 (not quite as rare) hours to turn one out, with the avg being around 19 or so. It is amazing how much faster a new pc will churn these things out.




It depends, are you after good looking stats or are you trying to help the SETI @ Home project or our SETI team?  If you are after helping the project (and team) then the maximum output is of primary importance and you should keep the old machine running.

The old 733 is it a PIII?  It should be able to do better than that.  My mothers PII 350 mhz (which I will soon swap for my #4 machine, upgrading her to an Athlon XP 2400+ and hurting my average time and output) averages about 16 hours / WU when I can run it.  Your 733 should be able to do it in 8 hours, even a Celeron should manage 9-10 hours.

Less than 24 hours ago I replaced the Athlon XP 2100+ in my #3 machine with a Athlon XP 3200+, according to SETIQueue that machine has already improved its average (calculated over 14 days) by 4 minutes and seems to be dropping my historical average by about 4 seconds a day.  My early estimate is that it will be doing ~ 2 hrs 10 minutes / WU on average.  That should drive my output up to 45-46 WUs/day total.  My #2 machine drags my average time up, but I wouldn't think of stopping it (upgrade the dual Athlon XP 2100+ to Athlon MP 2800+ yes, stop it no ).  The PII will drag my average time up when I trade my mother but I will be running it until I give it away sometime this summer.  Then I will be down to 3 machines and maybe 38 WUs/ day output.

Quote:

Ive done almost a hundred units in the last month. Of course, I saw where Raven said he was gonna top 1 THOUSAND a freaking DAY later this summer, but for this mere mortal, 100 a month is pretty good, lol!




Every WU counts.  Whether you do 1 a month or a 1000 a day it counts and helps both SETI @ Home and the team.  

Quote:

BTW, Raven is at #46 on the home users list now! Congrats.

Have a nice day!    




Cheating Bostich , he should be on the business users list.  Most of his WUs come from business machines not his home machines.  

Almost all of mine were generated by my own machines ( a few came from my mothers machine, which I gave her, and a few from a friends home/small business machines).  But I don't (and won't) make the top 1000 home users list.

I am #286 in Canada

286) IKV Nemesis     19528     8.207 years    3 hr 40 min 54.2 sec    Sat May 29 00:40:55 2004    Canada

and # 6 in Ontario

6) IKV Nemesis     19532     8.209 years    3 hr 40 min 54.0 sec    Sat May 29 02:49:41 2004    Canada      

As far as our team is concerned, I used to be at #5.  The best I can reasonably hope to do (unless we lose a higher ranked member, which I don't want to happen) is to maintain myself at 6th place.  If another business user shows up (like everyone above me) I could easily be knocked down the list, even out of the top 10.  But anyone who wants my spot is going to have to work for it .  If they can take it good for them and the team.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 30, 2004, 07:46:51 am
Well, here is the deal. The 733 uses XP Pro, so I have the client running on it, BUT, I also have seti as the screensaver, as it appears that other screensavers have to fight with the seti client for cpu cycles. (The starfield looks like the Enterprise is running out of gas, it stutters) I have the screensaver only stay up for one minute then go blank... Not sure why the time is less than what you think it should be, this is actually a 750, not a 733, but it is a 750 on a 100mhz clock, not 133. Perhaps that is the reason?

The laptop is running XP HOME, so you said I cant run the client. Perhaps that is the reason for the time lag?

Your right of course, the overall seti output SHOULD be the goal, shouldnt it?

Have a nice day!  
 
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 30, 2004, 09:02:26 am
Quote:

Well, here is the deal. The 733 uses XP Pro, so I have the client running on it, BUT, I also have seti as the screensaver, as it appears that other screensavers have to fight with the seti client for cpu cycles. (The starfield looks like the Enterprise is running out of gas, it stutters) I have the screensaver only stay up for one minute then go blank... Not sure why the time is less than what you think it should be, this is actually a 750, not a 733, but it is a 750 on a 100mhz clock, not 133. Perhaps that is the reason?




A PIII at 750mhz and 100 FSB should (according to SETISpy) output a workunit in 7hrs 50 minutes.  How much memory do you have on it?  I don't use XP Pro but someone who does may be able to say if you are being memory limited.

As I understand this you are using both the CLI and the screensaver?  That would naturally drive up the time.  Instead of using a screensaver use the energy saving option to turn off the monitor after an inactive time.  

Running both will not only make them take twice as long BUT will introduce OS overhead that makes them take even longer, especially if you are low on memory.

Quote:

The laptop is running XP HOME, so you said I cant run the client. Perhaps that is the reason for the time lag?




As far as I know the CLI should run on XP Home.  I have never tried it myself (I don't have XP Home or Pro).  If I said anything that led you to believe otherwise it was an error.

Quote:

Your right of course, the overall seti output SHOULD be the goal, shouldnt it?

Have a nice day!    




It is for me.  For those who want to keep their stats fast they can always create a new account to donate the output of slow running computers.  That way they get what they want while maintaining maximum output for SETI.  Everyone wins, no one loses.

The race for rank is merely a fun add on.  The competition between moofighters and myself way back when he passed me the first time entertained both of us and others who read the postings between us.  The Great Moo Hunt later did the same.  Unfortunately that ended a year ago when the moohunt ended .    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 30, 2004, 05:01:40 pm
Maybe that is my problem, using the client and screensaver. I will try it without. But that really does not account for the fact that even with running both, the screensaver version still sometimes gets one out as fast as 11 hours. Usually alot longer tho. Ill turn screeny off, see what gives. The 750 has 576 megs of ram, with almost nothing running other than all the XP Pro processes that say that blue bolts from the heavens will strike you head if you dare to turn them off.

Thanks for the info Nemesis. Ill keep plugging away. Im not really worried about stats, I obviously cant get very high up the list, lol. I just wanna be respectable! ALOT of the people in front of me are deadwood, and havent put out units in months/years so it's just a matter of time until I get up to some of you big boys near the top and p00p out.

Have a nice day!  
 
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 03, 2004, 06:08:30 pm
Quote:

I just wanna be respectable!




I call this respectable.

47) AJTK     1008     1.337 years    11 hr 37 min 22.8 sec    Thu Jun 3 20:26:15 2004    United States

Relatively few reach 4 figures OR a year of computer time.  Well done on both counts.

Quote:

I obviously cant get very high up the list, lol.




Sound like me back in the beginning.  I was told that as a home user the best I could hope for was the top 20 on the team, top 10 was impossible.  I don't understand that word impossible.  

Keep trying and just perhaps you will find the time comes that you are the big guy.  Improbable, perhaps.  Not impossible.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on June 03, 2004, 08:53:03 pm
lol, i dont think i will be cranking out 1K wu's per DAY anytime soon, rofl! but, im hoping to build a new desktop sometime this year. either with a top o the line hyperlthreading enabled p4 or perhaps an athalon fx64

yeah, over 1000! FINALLY! and my time is still going down down down

HAND!  
 
Title: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 06, 2004, 10:24:43 pm
5) Dragon93     25000     33.455 years    11 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Mon Jun 7 02:58:25 2004    United States  

Now lets see you get the 50,000 certificate.

 
Title: Re: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
Post by: Dragon93 on June 09, 2004, 07:05:35 pm
That's gonna be a while there buddy.

Unless I can commandeer some more machines...
Title: server troubles
Post by: The Postman on June 17, 2004, 11:03:24 am
Does anybody know what is going on with the data server? Is this a bandwidth problem on their end? They seem hard pressed to get it to run 48 hours without problems.  I can't keep my "service" machines running if they can't keep the server up. As it is I haven't been able to transmit for 2 days on my home machines.  
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 19, 2004, 09:32:25 am
June 17, 2004
We are working on fixing the network problems that are resulting in dropped connections to the data server.

June 18, 2004
The campus network folks did some great troubleshooting and narrowed down the problem to a faulty link on the path to our ISP. Repairs have been called in.

I've had trouble sending in but since I use SETIQueue I haven't missed a WU.    
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: The Postman on June 19, 2004, 03:41:13 pm
I have been following their troubles since they began posting. My problem is that I have 3 machines that I can't run any caching on. Everytime the server crashes on their end and one of these 3 machines tries to transmit and can't, it stops running until I can reboot it. I lose more than half of my capacity when those machines don't run.  In the meantime I have enlarged my cache by 1 day for the rest of my machines.  
Title: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Taldren_Admin on October 14, 2003, 12:24:59 pm
And we're off....
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 14, 2003, 12:31:39 pm
Quote:

And we're off....  




And that is news to whom?  

 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 14, 2003, 12:33:47 pm
Drat, if not for Farenheit, I would have had the last post in the second thread.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on October 14, 2003, 01:14:58 pm
Ok everyone post away.

Gotta get this thread above the old ones
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on October 14, 2003, 01:22:49 pm
Heh. It seems that we can only get so many posts before this version of the UBB stops the thread from working well.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 14, 2003, 01:59:59 pm
One of the last posts I made in Seti Thread II was a response from David Anderson - the power that be behind BOINC - to a note I sent him.

My original message was as follows:

Quote:

The ability of programs like SetiQueue to be a single point of contact for many Seti clients is important to maximum work unit production.  Many of the machines currently processing Seti work units do not have an internet connection, but connect to a single machine that does.

Remove the ability of SetiQueue to act as that single point of contact, and you also remove all of those non-internet connected machines from the pool.




His response:

 I think that an HTTP proxy would serve the same purpose.
I added some text to the "transition" page to this effect.
-- David  


The transition page of which he speaks is here:

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/boinc_transition_plan.html

and his address (should anyone have an issue with his response) is:

davea@ssl.berkeley.edu
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 14, 2003, 02:46:32 pm
Having said that non-Internet connected machines will not have access, I'm through after SETI I.  Most of my machines are behind a fairly ugly milnet firewall and have no access individually.  SETI is one of those banned Internet programs.  SETI can run but can not receive/ send W/Us.

Oh well, I guess I will have to be Lord God for Life for SETI I for Taldren.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 14, 2003, 03:04:17 pm
Like I said - if you have an issue with it, send Mr. Anderson a note explaining what the issue is and why.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: digi on October 14, 2003, 06:01:06 pm
Although I only use 3 machines, 2 of these will be affected by Seti 2.  I've emailed Mr. Anderson about the issue as you suggested.  Hopefully if he gets enough of these some action may be taken to solve this issue.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 14, 2003, 06:37:17 pm
Programs like SetiQueue and SetiDriver were created to handle problems with non internet connected machines by individuals.  I would be very surprised if the same did not occur with BOINC.  So give it time.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on October 14, 2003, 06:42:50 pm
This post brought to you buy the letter A

As in We need a BOINC Setiqueue
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 14, 2003, 07:10:00 pm
Since it looks like the old threads are going to be "unstickied" I think it may be useful to post a link to them.  Here they are.

Link to Seti thread I
Link to Seti thread II  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Mentat Jon on October 14, 2003, 07:25:05 pm
89) Mentat Jon   120 2530 hr 27 min 21 hr 05 min 13.5 sec Sat Sep 27 13:31:58 2003 United States



the slow creep to the summit continues!!!!  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on October 14, 2003, 08:33:30 pm
Well, due to two factors, I'm going to stop running seti, at least until we get another group going on another project. Lately, I've been having trouble paying bills so I'm turning off everything non-essential to try to drive down my electric bill. The other is just that this part is ending and it looks like there will be a lull between this one and the next so this is a good time to quit.

I just can't believe how fear this relatively small group has gone. We went from nothing to one of the top 200 groups in the world in just a short time. Does anyone know how long this group has be in existence and how long the SETI project has been going?  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Dogmatix! on October 15, 2003, 10:00:46 am
Well, I've been in it since like May of 1999...sadly, most of my time as a member has been on a slow machine.  Most of my total WUs have some since I set up on new rig in February...lol.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 15, 2003, 10:19:37 am
I joined the group in October 1, 2001, I believe when Erik first posted about it or shortly after.  It may have been a semi-private group before that.

It is certainly amazing when you consider that of our little group, I am number 1,948 in the world, Raven is 167 and Cyberkada is #143.

Go us!
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Dogmatix! on October 15, 2003, 10:22:00 am
Yeah...I joined our group shortly after it was set up, too.  In fact, i'm pretty sure I was one of the first five or so people.  When I joined, I was ranked #2 in our group with somewhwere around 1500 WUs...lol...



 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 15, 2003, 10:24:02 am
So who gave us less than 5 stars!

I say we hunt them down and give them the biggest wedgie they've ever felt.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on October 15, 2003, 04:29:35 pm
Seems someone has decided it is their mission to go around giving any thread started by an Admin or Mod 1 star. Just shows that jellyfish can use a keyboard and the internet too...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 16, 2003, 04:19:52 am
I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 16, 2003, 08:32:15 am
Quote:

I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.




Void's ban was temporary, and regardless of my personal opinion of Atra, he hasn't done anything under the rules to get banned for.  IMO, that means the rules need to be tweaked a bit.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 16, 2003, 08:43:21 am
He has a right to his opinon... just show him how it is not a good one.  

We don't want him gone.  

We need to show his arguement as the fool's arguement it is.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 16, 2003, 03:44:08 pm
My point is that Atrahasis pretty much can say anything in these forums with impunity.  Any one else is banned for the exact same thing.  I see the double standard and its appalling.  I guess if we all support radical Islamist terrorism, we can say pretty much anything in these forums.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Taldren_Admin on October 17, 2003, 09:58:18 pm
Quote:

My point is that Atrahasis pretty much can say anything in these forums with impunity.  Any one else is banned for the exact same thing.  I see the double standard and its appalling.  I guess if we all support radical Islamist terrorism, we can say pretty much anything in these forums.
 




Off topic but I will reply to that...

The answer is:

Damned if I do damned if I don't.  He has no impunity. He hasn't crossed the line far enough.

By the way, just in case you were thinking about it.... Please don't post a list of his transgressions. Send me a PM with the links if you really believe that in the way he stated his opinions he has crossed the line.

Now back to our regularly scheduled show.....
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on October 17, 2003, 10:33:18 pm
Quote:

I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.
   




Cyber,

Is this your 523rd or 524th "Im outta here cause(fill in Blank) ?

   
Title: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 18, 2003, 01:44:49 pm
11) Sethan     7500  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: jualdeaux on October 18, 2003, 03:09:54 pm
Good job Nem
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 18, 2003, 08:48:45 pm
Heh - I'm looking to make it into the Taldren top 10 some time this week.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: SPQR Renegade001 on October 19, 2003, 04:52:35 pm
Quote:

11) Sethan     7500  




7500 WU and 8198 posts. Hmmm.... I think I know how to get a few more WUs out of Sethan's machine  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 19, 2003, 09:15:39 pm
Quote:

Quote:

11) Sethan     7500  




7500 WU and 8198 posts. Hmmm.... I think I know how to get a few more WUs out of Sethan's machine  




Chuckle.  Most of those WU are from the last 6 months.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 20, 2003, 11:18:20 am
Well A few notes...  Lost several thousand units due to a slip up with the Queue.

Oh well...

Broke the 100 Year barrier for processing time for Seti WUs!!!

I too think I am going to try to get my Post total more inline with my WU total...

Wonder how long it would take to post 160,000 messages...

Maybe if I hire Sirgod and Sethan fulltime.

GE-Raven


 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 20, 2003, 11:19:50 am

Does anybody know if Brian Kinney changed his Seti nickname to KD4?

Brian disappeared from the group, and KD4 showed up at the same time, with about the right number of WUs.


"Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must first be overcome." -- Samuel Johnson  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 11:25:15 am
Quote:

Wonder how long it would take to post 160,000 messages...

Maybe if I hire Sirgod and Sethan fulltime.  




I'm available...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 20, 2003, 11:38:46 am
Well If I did hire ya I doubt anyone would notice that you were posting for me (except for an increase in volume of those posts).  We have oft been "on the same side of the coin".  Maybe that is why Atra dislikes us so...    

Now as for SIrgod... I would have to clean up that "Okey accent" a bit...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 11:45:58 am
Quote:

Well If I did hire ya I doubt anyone would notice that you were posting for me (except for an increase in volume of those posts).  We have oft been "on the same side of the coin".  Maybe that is why Atra dislikes us so...      




*Gasp*  Do you really think Atra doesn't like us?  I'm so hurt.

I was going more for something like 'deeply detests'.

Ah well.  I'll have to try harder.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: KD4 on October 20, 2003, 02:35:16 pm
Quote:


Does anybody know if Brian Kinney changed his Seti nickname to KD4?

Brian disappeared from the group, and KD4 showed up at the same time, with about the right number of WUs.


"Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must first be overcome." -- Samuel Johnson  




yes i did change my name.. it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 20, 2003, 02:50:08 pm
Quote:


yes i did change my name..




OK, thanks.  And noted as suck.


Quote:

it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  




Sethan will pass Noah Wallace in about 6 days, and Zeppa 2 days after that.  To make it happen in that order, Zeppa will pass Noah in a couple of days.

Down in the 20's, The Postman is cranking out a respectable 18-19 WU per day.  He'll make the top 20 in a couple of months.


"If all it takes for you to give up your freedom are some pretty words or alarming rhetoric, then you are simply not going to remain free" -- Thomas Sowell
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 04:06:07 pm
Quote:

it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  




That long do you think?    I have to admit, I cheat.  I have about 20 low end machines working, and some better ones.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 20, 2003, 06:25:42 pm
Quote:


Down in the 20's, The Postman is cranking out a respectable 18-19 WU per day.  He'll make the top 20 in a couple of months.
 




If seti runs that long  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Mazeppa on October 22, 2003, 06:22:10 am
Quote:

Heh - I'm looking to make it into the Taldren top 10 some time this week.  




10) Sethan  7803  5.132 years 5 hr 45 min 42.4 sec Wed Oct 22 02:08:04 2003 United States

...and you have!  Congratulations!  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 23, 2003, 07:23:23 am
The servers seem to be down this AM and a useless bump to the top of the list.  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 24, 2003, 08:53:19 am
Hey guys, I'm thinking of joining your group!

I've only got 1 PC and I can't run it 24/7 but it is a 2800 XP (barton core) running at 333Mhz with 1GB of RAM and I can crank out a WU in 3 hours, (command line version). What's the fastest you guys have done a WU on your PC, (or fastest PC if you have a network)?

Give me a while to set-it up, (I don't have any WU's to carry over though so I will have to start from 0).
 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 24, 2003, 09:56:07 am
Hey, welcome to the group!


Work Units can vary quite a bit in the length it takes to process them.  I've seen WUs take less than 2 hours, and then WUs take more than 5 hours, on the same machine, with the same load.


It's just the way it is.


"Use wisely your power of choice." -- Og Mandino
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 24, 2003, 10:24:57 am
Ah ok. Well, I've signed up to Taldren now so I guess I'll keep an eye on my average WU time.

Impressive group stats I might add. You guys have processed more WU's than the whole of Egypt put together! W00t!!!

   
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 24, 2003, 11:36:33 pm
Poster: Lurker
Quote:

Hey guys, I'm thinking of joining your group!

I've only got 1 PC and I can't run it 24/7 but it is a 2800 XP (barton core) running at 333Mhz with 1GB of RAM and I can crank out a WU in 3 hours, (command line version). What's the fastest you guys have done a WU on your PC, (or fastest PC if you have a network)?

Give me a while to set-it up, (I don't have any WU's to carry over though so I will have to start from 0).
   




My Athlon 2400XP (thoroughbred core) with 266mhz and 512 MB ram does 1 WU in 2:50 - 2:55 so you should be able to get a little more from that baby.  My other 2 machines process slower, but since they are both dual processor they output more WU's / day by processing two at a time.  Barring crashes my 3 machines put out a total of ~35 WUs/day.  

I just noticed we have passed 600,000  work units.   WOOO!! WOO!!!    

AND!

I passed 5 computer years!

Total CPU Time     5.004 years
SETI@home user for:    1.762 years
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 25, 2003, 04:21:55 pm
Hmmm...2 hours 41 mins for my first WU. I think I'm pleased with that.  

It would be nice to see how that compares with Pentium 4's, with or without Hyperthreading.  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Stormbringer on October 25, 2003, 04:41:03 pm
Maximum PC did benchmarks on th first A64 machines this month 2.2 ghz A64- 55fx; 105 minutes, 3.2 ghz P4c 133 minutes, 2.2 ghz Athlon XP; 136.7 minutes. Don't know about the family scalability speedwise but it is likely the second and third gen chips will be much faster. I'm waiting for them to support nonparity memory (in the works) or for parity memory to become more available and hence less expensive. But I will get one eventually.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 26, 2003, 05:59:51 pm
WU's done = 6

Average time = 2 hr 16 min 33.9 sec

W00T!!!11 Go AMD!    
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Jim on October 28, 2003, 12:43:04 pm
Hey!  

I have been getting an "Unknown ERROR 100" for the last 2 days... anyone have a clue as to what that is???  

Jim
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Gambler on October 28, 2003, 12:47:31 pm
Quote:

Hey!  

I have been getting an "Unknown ERROR 100" for the last 2 days... anyone have a clue as to what that is???  

Jim  




That's a new one to me.  Where have you been getting the error message?
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Jim on October 28, 2003, 12:51:37 pm
Seti starts to run... it tries to connect... it says I have done 0 units so far... and after about 3 seconds the program aborts.  I haven't a clue as to why, but SETI quit running 2 days ago on my computer and I can't get it started again.

Hrm... I just uninstalled SETI v3.07 and installed SETI v3.08... same problem.  The first thing the program tries to do is send a unit I have done to the SETI computer... maybe my work unit was messed up?  Is there anyway to clear that out (just delete the work unit so it won't try to send it the results?)?  Other than that, I have no idea why it won't run...

UPDATE:  While experimenting, I move the 3 files result.sah, temp.sah, and wtemp.sah to a temporary storage area, and the SETI program started.  It immediately downloaded another unit and started working on it.  The user data on the screen for me is now blank... total units listed as 0... but it is running... strange...  Anyone know what those 3 files do?

Thanks in advance

Jim
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 28, 2003, 08:12:22 pm
Is anybody else having trouble with connections? 2 of my p4s are stopped right now because they can't connect.  
Title: can't Connect? Here is the answer
Post by: The Postman on October 28, 2003, 08:41:26 pm
? October 27, 2003 ?
 
Quote:

 ? October 27, 2003 ?
If you are unable to connect due to "100" errors (or perhaps "41") you may need to exit SETI@home, remove the files "result.sah" and "user_info.sah" from your system, and then restart SETI@home. This is probably fallout from the user database crash a few days ago. Sorry for the inconvenience.
 



 
Title: Golden Work Unit Achieved!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 01, 2003, 09:35:13 pm
The Golden Work Unit is what they call it on the SETI message boards when your rank and your results recieved are the same.  

Results Received    11414
Your rank out of 4735612 total users is:    11414th place.

Like mine now is (briefly).  
Title: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: The Postman on November 06, 2003, 08:56:37 am
These forums will be Read only in a week. We need to get this moved or start a new one. If we start a new one, lets get all the important links and instructions in the first post as well as what we are doing so that any new recruits won't have to search the thread.  Maybe somebody could put up what the first post could look like and we could comment on it here.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Gambler on November 06, 2003, 09:22:00 am
Quote:

These forums will be Read only in a week. We need to get this moved or start a new one. If we start a new one, lets get all the important links and instructions in the first post as well as what we are doing so that any new recruits won't have to search the thread.  Maybe somebody could put up what the first post could look like and we could comment on it here.




Did anybody else get a little dizzy when the thread moved?
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: digi on November 12, 2003, 05:45:20 pm
Whoooo!       1904 Units.  2000 Units here I come.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Commander Xizor on November 15, 2003, 04:01:51 pm
What happened to our totals?  It seems to have gone down dramatically the last couple of days.  I know we lost Cyber a while  ago, but did we lose someone else?

At least my 2500 WU's aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 15, 2003, 04:35:54 pm
Quote:

What happened to our totals?  It seems to have gone down dramatically the last couple of days.  I know we lost Cyber a while  ago, but did we lose someone else?

At least my 2500 WU's aren't going anywhere anytime soon.  




Raven left as well.  

My WUs stay as well.    
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: KD4 on November 15, 2003, 08:30:23 pm
why did they leave?
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 15, 2003, 08:40:19 pm
Quote:

why did they leave?  




Neither one said anything they were just gone.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 16, 2003, 08:13:48 pm
I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.

I don't know which order I will achieve them but suspect that passing Max will be last (around Christmas sometime if SETI lasts that long).  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: GE-Raven on November 17, 2003, 09:27:37 am
Quote:

Quote:

why did they leave?  




Neither one said anything they were just gone.    




http://forums.taldren.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=214414&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

This is all I can say.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Fahrenheit on November 17, 2003, 03:46:36 pm
Quote:

I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.

I don't know which order I will achieve them but suspect that passing Max will be last (around Christmas sometime if SETI lasts that long).  





My three goals are:


1) Make 5000th WU. Est: 11 December, 2003

2) Make Taldren's Top 15.  Est: 21 December, 2003

3) Make 1st place in my Registration Class: Estimated Date 14 February 2004


I don't know if I'll make them or not.

 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: GE-Raven on November 18, 2003, 04:45:14 pm
Ok... I am back...

Erik, ya got until Christmas for new goals.

Tick - Tock


GE-Raven

 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Toasty0 on November 18, 2003, 08:23:54 pm
Quote:

Ok... I am back...

Erik, ya got until Christmas for new goals.

Tick - Tock


GE-Raven

   




Christmas? Man, Sean, you're too charitable.

Hey, bro, you done (read my lazy slang as: COMPOSED) any new music you might like to share?

Glad you stayed.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: GE-Raven on November 19, 2003, 08:50:44 am
Nothing new yet, do have a few ideas brewing though...

Glad you stayed too ToastyO... didn't mean to be too hard on ya in the other thread, but I want to make sure I don't appear "biased".

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on November 19, 2003, 12:06:45 pm
Well, I've gone about as high as I'm going to.  I have been asked to remove the SETI client from the machines here at work.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Toasty0 on November 20, 2003, 01:17:56 am
Quote:

Well, I've gone about as high as I'm going to.  I have been asked to remove the SETI client from the machines here at work.  




That's a shame. I hope producing those WUs hasn't caused you any trouble.

Thanks for all the units you did bring in though. They and your participation have moved the project and Taldren SETI forward and is mucho appreciated.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Seti server down
Post by: The Postman on December 03, 2003, 09:27:40 am
FYI
The server has been down this morning for at least the last 4 hours.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: jualdeaux on December 04, 2003, 02:15:04 pm
HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Sethan on December 04, 2003, 03:07:35 pm
Quote:

HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????  




no.
Title: Congrats to Gambler!
Post by: GE-Raven on December 08, 2003, 11:08:06 am
Gambler Breaks 40K

Congrats man...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Congrats to Gambler!
Post by: Gambler on December 08, 2003, 03:04:58 pm
Quote:

Gambler Breaks 40K

Congrats man...

GE-Raven
   




Thank you.  I hadn't paid that much attention to it.    I've been slacking off just a bit.  I did add a new machine to my stable.  Well, I replaced one.  I pulled my P4 750 and replaced it with a P4 2.8.  Merry Christmas to me.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Dogmatix! on December 08, 2003, 03:14:18 pm
Quote:

HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????  





heh...still here, but I've been close to pulling the plug on my 4 1/2 year affiliation with the SETI@home project.  I guess I'm getting a little bored with the whole thing and it's becoming more of a nuisance than anything else.

Additionally, i'm kind of sick of seeing our team's place in the rankings affected so greatly by the whims of members choosing to leave for this reason and that...





 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Reffet on December 10, 2003, 12:47:44 am
Wow, I must have mised a lot! been down for several months (due to job situation) and just now got back online. Just lost a machine due to burned out Microprocessor but stll have my main gun going, Dang - it! Ill never catch you now Pirate.  
Title: Question about command line client and hyper-threading.
Post by: GE-Raven on December 15, 2003, 10:48:00 am
Just noticed that on the new "hyper-threaded" machines that the client only runs at 50%.  Anybody know how to get it back to 99%?

Thanks...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Question about command line client and hyper-threading.
Post by: ChAotiCIllusion on December 15, 2003, 01:33:50 pm
Quote:

Just noticed that on the new "hyper-threaded" machines that the client only runs at 50%.  Anybody know how to get it back to 99%?

Thanks...

GE-Raven
   




You have to run 2 instances of seti seti driver can do this I don't know how to do it any other way. My HT machine can poor out 2 units every 3 hours
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Xizor on December 17, 2003, 09:58:09 pm
From the post in Hot and Spicy by Erik:

Quote:

Okay here is the new goal: Beat Mexico!




Taldren WU: 439300
Mexico WU: 2550330

Tall order indeed.  I'd say some big-crunch recruiting may be in order.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 17, 2003, 10:19:30 pm
Quote:

From the post in Hot and Spicy by Erik:

Quote:

Okay here is the new goal: Beat Mexico!




Taldren WU: 439300
Mexico WU: 2550330

Tall order indeed.  I'd say some big-crunch recruiting may be in order.  




I don't know offhand where you got your numbers but here are mine from the top 200 team list:
Code:

141) Mexico Team    112   504283      580.600 years     10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren        164   439498      354.856 years      7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec

       
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 18, 2003, 08:23:20 am
The difference is probably between the NATION of mexico, and Team Mexico
Title: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 18, 2003, 08:24:37 am
12/17/03
 
Quote:

 141) Mexico Team    112   504283      580.600 years     10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren        164   439498      354.856 years      7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec





Today
 
Quote:

 133) Mexico Team 112 504523 580.775 years 10 hr 05 min 02.2 sec
 155) Taldren 164 439708 354.995 years 7 hr 04 min 20.3 sec


 

Mexico gained 240
Taldren gained 210

for a net gain of -30

I can cut 10  - 15 off the loss once the severs are up and running again and I can get the machines at work running again.
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 18, 2003, 08:49:37 am
You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 18, 2003, 11:13:25 am
There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: RogueJedi_XC on December 18, 2003, 11:17:27 am
Quote:

You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
   




!!!
Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...

 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 18, 2003, 11:46:15 am
 
Quote:

Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...
 




There are 2 P4's and a P3 that need to be running 24/7 in the dispatch. Most of the time they are logged off doing nothing. So I just use the spare clock cycles to run seti with the chiefs OK. Only problem is that because of the network setup these machines are on, I can't use setiQueue to cache and so when the Seti servers go down I need to restart each unit.
   
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 18, 2003, 01:12:20 pm
Quote:

Quote:

You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
   




!!!
Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...

   




I am the Network Admin... I let me run SETI on our machines  

I have actually found it beneficial on machines that run 3d modelling aps such as 3dsmax.  The Win2k Idle thread is bugged and has a memory leak when programs spen a lot of time at 99% processor utilization.  The Seti command line, works much better.  As long as Memory isn't a problem I find Seti to allow the machine to stay "up" much longer without ill-effects.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Xizor on December 18, 2003, 09:36:54 pm
Quote:

The difference is probably between the NATION of mexico, and Team Mexico  




That would be it.  I suppose Team Mexico makes a little more sense.
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 18, 2003, 10:10:25 pm
Quote:

There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page  




Just a little bump.  Welcome back.  Now I have to EARN my way into the top 5.   Sooon.  By New Years perhaps.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 19, 2003, 09:44:07 am
12/17/03
 
Quote:

 141) Mexico Team 112 504283 580.600 years 10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren 164 439498 354.856 years 7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec
 




12/19/03

 Mexico Team - 505310
 Taldren         - 472414

 Mexico Team gained - 1027
 Taldren          gained - 1924 + 30992 from Phillip Showel      
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 19, 2003, 09:52:55 am
Quote:

There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page  




Smallish...

 


GOod to see ya back dread.  Time to kick tail...

BTW I will soon be posing about a milestone for me.
 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 19, 2003, 08:00:18 pm
I say smallish because besides the units i have, i barely get any now.

Most of my old standby machines got nuked, and i;ve been told not to put Seti on them unless i use the machine a ton (ie my work machine)
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 20, 2003, 09:09:09 pm
Quote:

I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.




Goal 1/ Max is still holding on by 281 work units

5) Max Peck     13404
6) IKV Nemesis  13123

Goal 2/ accomplished!  I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4799782 total users is:    9999th place.

Gaining on goal 3/ only .008% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.792% of our users.      
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 21, 2003, 10:55:11 am
 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




12/21/03
Mexico Team - 506718
Taldren - 473158

Team Mexico produced 1408
Taldren produced 744

For a net loss of 664 WU  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 23, 2003, 10:53:22 am
Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.

In other news.  

Raven roars past 200,000 Work Units.

1) Raven     200636    

 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 24, 2003, 06:59:27 am
Quote:

Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.
   




I just recalculated using those links and we are now behind 33194, a gain of 352 in roughly 20 hours.

My #3 computer has an odd work unit processing now.  It has taken 8.5 hours so far and SETISpy is forcasting a total time of 15.5 hours.  That machine usually does a WU in 2.85 hours.  Must have some interesting data.  (AR=1.103, which might normally push the time up a little but nothing like this.  Note, forcast total time for completion has started to drop).

Data below is from SETISpy.
Code:

Spike           Power   Score   Signal ratio   Resolution   Frequency   Time   Drift rate
Best score   198.89    0.697    24.861            0.075             1419265230.60    87.24    -2.7950
Returned 1   196.37    0.691    24.547          0.075             1419259000.72    87.26    0.0037
Returned 2   193.39    0.684    24.174            0.075             1419258999.75    87.26    0.0092
Returned 3   193.57    0.685    24.196            0.075             1419260413.94    33.70    3.8708
Returned 4   186.32    0.668    23.289            0.075             1419265884.75    101.09    -1.4566
Returned 5   194.34    0.687    24.293            0.075             1419265885.13    101.09    -1.4585
Returned 6   192.57    0.683    24.072            0.075             1419265885.50    101.09    -1.4603
Returned 7   181.71    0.657    22.713            0.075             1419265885.87    101.09    -1.4622
Returned 8   198.89    0.697    24.861            0.075             1419265230.59    87.26    -2.7950
Returned 9   189.14    0.675    23.643            0.075             1419265231.56    87.26    -2.8005


       
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 28, 2003, 09:57:37 am
Quote:

Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.

In other news.  

Raven roars past 200,000 Work Units.

1) Raven     200636    

   




Mexico Results received    511516

Taldren  Results received 479594

Mexico's lead = 31922  Gain = 1624 or about 325/day at that rate roughly 98 days until we match them.

I believe Raven put himself back into high gear.  

 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 04, 2004, 08:41:44 am
Mexico Team Results received  516136

Taldren Results received 486645    

Difference = 29491

Since December 23rd a gain of 4055 WUs

Quote:

Goal 1/ Max is still holding on by 281 work units

5) Max Peck 13404
6) IKV Nemesis 13123

Goal 2/ accomplished! I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4799782 total users is: 9999th place.

Gaining on goal 3/ only .008% to go  




Personal goals achieved.

Goal 1/ accomplished!

5) IKV Nemesis 13633
6) Max Peck 13630

That is as high as I go.  There is no way I can catch Dragons business network and everyone else has too much of a lead to catch before SETI 1 ends even if they stopped processing now.  (No I don't know the date SETI 1 ends but it would take 18 months just to reach Dreadlords current stats at my rate of processing WUs)

Goal 2/ accomplished! on December 20 I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4818492 total users is:    9651st place.  Top 9000 here I come.

Gaining on goal 3/ accomplished!  

You have completed more work units than    99.800% of our users.  

Next goal 99.85%.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on January 17, 2004, 08:32:01 am
 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  
Title: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 19, 2004, 06:33:26 pm
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis

Results Received    14172
Total CPU Time    6.177 years

Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 49 min 04.6 sec
Average results received per day    19.42

Last result returned:   Tue Jan 20 00:16:44 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   2.000 years

Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 4844072 total users is:    9334th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.807% of our users.  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 20, 2004, 08:41:18 am
Happy Aniversary.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dogmatix! on January 20, 2004, 04:05:46 pm
I've been on the team since it was started and I've actually been crunching SETI WUs since May of 1999 but as of this past weekend, I'd decided to pretty much stop participating in the project.   In fact, they pretty much ceased about two weeks ago due to my wife always closing the SETI Driver program rather than just minimizing it when she was using the computer.  During that time, I got passed up by one or two guys on our team that I was outproducing.  Aside from a general boredom with the program itself, I've grown tired of fighting the Spousal Unit's general disregard for my wish to crunch SETI WUs as quickly as possible.


I'll likely just leave my meager total of completed WUs with the Taldren team but my slow and steady trickle of 10-15 WUs per day will cease.


It's been fun...heheh.


 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 20, 2004, 06:12:23 pm
Quote:

I've been on the team since it was started and I've actually been crunching SETI WUs since May of 1999 but as of this past weekend, I'd decided to pretty much stop participating in the project.   In fact, they pretty much ceased about two weeks ago due to my wife always closing the SETI Driver program rather than just minimizing it when she was using the computer.  During that time, I got passed up by one or two guys on our team that I was outproducing.  Aside from a general boredom with the program itself, I've grown tired of fighting the Spousal Unit's general disregard for my wish to crunch SETI WUs as quickly as possible.


I'll likely just leave my meager total of completed WUs with the Taldren team but my slow and steady trickle of 10-15 WUs per day will cease.


It's been fun...heheh.


 




You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.
 
Title: I have arrived
Post by: The Postman on January 21, 2004, 06:46:32 pm
The Postman  
Results Received  4431
Your rank out of 4846988 total users is:  48458th place.  
The number of users who have this rank:  22  
 You have completed more work units than  99.000% of our users.    
   
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 21, 2004, 06:50:22 pm
Quote:

You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.




Any particular reason for the change?  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 22, 2004, 11:19:28 am
Quote:

Quote:

You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.




Any particular reason for the change?  




Yes.  But it's a Dynaverse thing.
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 22, 2004, 12:48:39 pm
so anyone here know how to run SETI client on Linux ?

Think I got the client, but before I go nuts with it, I thought I would get some tips.

I need to find a way to get my numbers up!

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 25, 2004, 01:30:34 pm
Quote:

so anyone here know how to run SETI client on Linux ?

Think I got the client, but before I go nuts with it, I thought I would get some tips.

I need to find a way to get my numbers up!

GE-Raven
   




First of all, nice pic.

Next...."I need to find a way to get my numbers up"....LOL

Try:

http://theconsortium.info/print.php?sid=18

http://www.setiteam.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&catid=&topic=6

To see if these might help.

Maz  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 28, 2004, 05:17:00 am
Yay i made 3k wus

 24) Lobo   3024 3.179 years 9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003 United States
25) f9TH SIR X   3004 2.433 years 7 hr 05 min 44.4 sec Tue Jan 27 05:49:54 2004 New Zealand
26) Bill Castner   2935 2.085 years 6 hr 13 min 19.3 sec Wed Jan 28 08:21:52 2004 United States

 And who is the new Dizzy hater in 9th place    
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 28, 2004, 08:42:12 am
Quote:



 And who is the new Dizzy hater in 9th place    




LOL! The one time in a month I check this thread it comes on the heels of a post like this.

Sheesh!
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 29, 2004, 04:37:18 am
Well its here in black and white

 9) Dizzy is a Dirty Cheating Snothead   8977 11.217 years 10 hr 56 min 45.1 sec Fri Jan 16 14:04:29 2004 United States
   
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 29, 2004, 05:08:32 am
I dont understand. wtf is that?
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 30, 2004, 03:28:22 am
  Its the person who is in 9th place team name

1) Raven   225963 135.199 years 5 hr 14 min 28.7 sec Thu Jan 29 17:46:22 2004 United States
2) ICE Gambler   44125 38.506 years 7 hr 38 min 40.0 sec Thu Jan 29 16:00:24 2004 United States
3) Phillip Showel   31351 27.345 years 7 hr 38 min 26.0 sec Thu Jan 29 18:32:35 2004 United States
4) Dragon93   19094 26.309 years 12 hr 04 min 12.7 sec Thu Jan 29 16:26:54 2004 United States
5) IKV Nemesis   14486 6.299 years 3 hr 48 min 32.6 sec Thu Jan 29 04:13:42 2004 Canada
6) Max Peck   14041 8.568 years 5 hr 20 min 42.6 sec Thu Jan 29 18:11:39 2004 Canada
7) Sethan   9298 6.031 years 5 hr 40 min 54.6 sec Thu Jan 29 16:36:50 2004 United States
8) KD4   9209 5.136 years 4 hr 53 min 09.7 sec Thu Jan 29 17:07:27 2004 United States
  9) Dizzy is a Dirty Cheating Snothead   8977 11.217 years 10 hr 56 min 45.1 sec Fri Jan 16 14:04:29 2004 United States  
10) Noah Wallace III   8651 7.531 years 7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004 United States
11) Kenneth Yeast   7894 6.818 years 7 hr 33 min 55.6 sec Thu Jan 29 18:02:13 2004 United States
12) Nasim  7402 3.019 years 3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003 Canada
13) ChAotiCIllusion   6745 2.657 years 3 hr 27 min 04.8 sec Thu Jan 29 11:08:51 2004 United Kingdom
14) KBF-Dogmatix    5811 4.097 years 6 hr 10 min 32.6 sec Sun Jan 18 04:23:20 2004 United States
15) Intrepid-XC   5089 4.430 years 7 hr 37 min 35.2 sec Thu Jan 29 17:07:30 2004 United States
16) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
17) Sven Forkbeard   4834 7.140 years 12 hr 56 min 22.0 sec Thu Jan 29 13:40:38 2004 United States
18) The Postman   4573 2.667 years 5 hr 06 min 33.6 sec Thu Jan 29 16:18:18 2004 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States
20) SGM RAS   4046 6.853 years 14 hr 50 min 18.0 sec Sat Jan 3 14:15:19 2004 United States
21) RazalYllib   3669 3.833 years 9 hr 09 min 06.8 sec Thu Jan 29 03:19:48 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3575 1.580 years 3 hr 52 min 14.5 sec Wed Jan 28 04:45:04 2004 United States
23) Ronbo   3334 2.628 years 6 hr 54 min 17.7 sec Thu Jan 29 08:26:22 2004 United States
24) Lobo   3024 3.179 years 9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003 United States
25) f9TH SIR X   3017 2.439 years 7 hr 04 min 58.5 sec Thu Jan 29 08:22:05 2004 New Zealand
26) Bill Castner   2945 2.088 years 6 hr 12 min 41.2 sec Thu Jan 29 18:42:16 2004 United States
27) Jim   2729 2.210 years 7 hr 05 min 42.0 sec Thu Jan 29 11:42:58 2004 United States
28) digi  2359 8106 hr 53 min 3 hr 26 min 11.6 sec Fri Dec 19 22:14:35 2003 United Kingdom

  And no i dont know who it is  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: KD4 on January 30, 2004, 04:05:19 am
who was in that spot a few days before?    
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 30, 2004, 09:14:46 am
Originally posted by Mazeppa:

Quote:



You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.
   




Any help?

 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 30, 2004, 09:38:51 am
yeah, lets find out who it is, hehe. Its obvious its prolly a D2 player. I want to find out so I can hunt his ass down and kill him on the next server. I'll bet he will be playing RDSL... Muhahahahaha!!!
Title: Anybody miss me?
Post by: Dragon93 on February 05, 2004, 05:55:26 pm
So once again, the demands of life, employment and other things have sucked away most of my free time and I have been absent from the forum for a bit. I also went through a bit of an anti-social phase as I am wont to do from time to time.

Anyway, I decided to drop in and say hello as it has been far too long. Still pumping out WUs, though that is mostly on autopilot right now. I was quite surprised to see that I am creeping up to the 20,000 mark in the near future...

Good to see things are still cooking and good to see some familiar names.

Until next time...
 
Title: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: GE-Raven on February 09, 2004, 04:22:30 pm
Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: The Postman on February 10, 2004, 01:50:13 pm
Quote:

Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
   




Why don't you go back to the screen saver on these machines?  
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: DreadlordGW on February 10, 2004, 07:25:31 pm
From my experience even the screensaver interferes somewhat.

Quote:

Quote:

Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
   




Why don't you go back to the screen saver on these machines?  


Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: digi on February 11, 2004, 03:42:40 am
I've been away from SETI crunching for a couple of months now, but I thought I'd come back.  I've just got a new machine to add into the fray.  Dual 2.8Ghz H/T P4.  Very sweet - its running 4 units at once.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on February 11, 2004, 07:37:54 pm
Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: Bob Graham on February 18, 2004, 05:30:33 pm
Long time no speak all.  What is this 'BONIC' and is it as evil as the name sounds?
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: digi on March 17, 2004, 05:52:34 am
Quote:

Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.    





How goes the quest to beat Mexico?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Age on March 17, 2004, 01:19:21 pm
    You are right Nemesis you do spend a lot of time in here and this is a big Thread to big to sink my teeth into
 I though you meant Canadas place in the sun.I guess I will have to read all this sometime and when I get it .

  Let just not argue about are ships ok  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sirgod on March 17, 2004, 01:36:57 pm
Welcome here Age, If you have broadband, then Please sign up, and help the taldren team out. I know you can do It with dial up, But It does help for prossesing alot of WU's.

and yes, I'll try and get back on the bandwagon again and Get a few WU's done at night.

stephen
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on March 17, 2004, 03:12:34 pm
Quote:

Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




As of 2/11/04
135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.    




As of 3/14/04

Mexico  572021
Taldren  552530

Since 2/11, Mexico has produced 25,886
Since 2/11, Taldren has produced 27,488
for a net gain of 1602 or 50.06/day
At this pace, it will take 389.35 days to catch Mexico  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: digi on March 17, 2004, 04:00:05 pm
Ouch - Thats a long time.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 12:37:32 am
Quote:

    You are right Nemesis you do spend a lot of time in here and this is a big Thread to big to sink my teeth into
 I though you meant Canadas place in the sun.I guess I will have to read all this sometime and when I get it .

  Let just not argue about are ships ok    




Not argue debate .   I didn't take it too seriously.

Since no one has posted a team list in a long time here is one:

Top Members:
Name (and URL)    Results received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     252484    149.524 years    5 hr 11 min 15.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:22:07 2004    United States
2) ICE Gambler     48806    42.022 years    7 hr 32 min 32.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:12:29 2004    United States
3) Phillip Showel     31589    27.548 years    7 hr 38 min 21.6 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:19:35 2004    United States
4) Dragon93     21524    29.278 years    11 hr 54 min 57.3 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:47:19 2004    United States
 5) IKV Nemesis     16476    7.055 years    3 hr 45 min 03.5 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:32:08 2004    Canada
6) Max Peck     14617    8.844 years    5 hr 18 min 01.0 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:34:14 2004    Canada
7) KD4     9919    5.366 years    4 hr 44 min 20.6 sec    Thu Mar 18 04:27:16 2004    United States
8) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
9) Dizzy is Still a Snot     9125    11.437 years    10 hr 58 min 45.2 sec    Fri Mar 12 15:51:25 2004    United States
10) Noah Wallace III    8651    7.531 years    7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec    Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004    United States
11) Kenneth Yeast     8606    7.175 years    7 hr 18 min 11.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:39:59 2004    United States
12) ChAotiCIllusion     7576    2.903 years    3 hr 21 min 23.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:34:40 2004    United Kingdom
13) Nasim    7402    3.019 years    3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec    Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003    Canada
14) KBF-Dogmatix     5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
15) The Postman     5479    3.194 years    5 hr 06 min 24.0 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:50:08 2004    United States
16) Intrepid-XC     5345    4.656 years    7 hr 37 min 51.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:54:51 2004    United States
17) Sven Forkbeard     4939    7.247 years    12 hr 51 min 09.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:49:02 2004    United States
18) Fahrenheit    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
19) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
20) SGM RAS     4131    6.958 years    14 hr 45 min 14.3 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:49:24 2004    United States
21) RazalYllib     4009    4.018 years    8 hr 46 min 46.4 sec    Wed Mar 17 15:14:15 2004    United States
22) RedHotChiliDog    3626    1.601 years    3 hr 52 min 04.3 sec    Wed Mar 17 12:56:52 2004    United States
23) Ronbo     3374    2.701 years    7 hr 00 min 44.8 sec    Wed Mar 17 12:21:01 2004    United States
24) f9TH SIR X     3248    2.548 years    6 hr 52 min 23.5 sec    Tue Mar 16 10:30:47 2004    New Zealand
25) Bill Castner     3230    2.252 years    6 hr 06 min 26.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 04:55:40 2004    United States
26) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
27) Jim     2916    2.331 years    7 hr 00 min 14.2 sec    Sun Mar 14 23:10:47 2004    United States
28) digi    2872    1.152 years    3 hr 30 min 53.9 sec    Wed Mar 17 08:31:53 2004    United Kingdom
29) hobbesmaster     2613    1.610 years    5 hr 23 min 55.8 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:47:23 2004    United States
30) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
31) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
32) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
33) Reffet     2095    1.584 years    6 hr 37 min 28.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:30:09 2004    United States
34) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
35) BobGraham     1846    1.161 years    5 hr 30 min 37.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 00:33:28 2004    United States
36) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
37) Hollis J. Wood    1666    1.313 years    6 hr 54 min 08.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:41:29 2004    Canada
38) Malystryx_XC     1417    1.578 years    9 hr 45 min 24.7 sec    Mon Mar 15 20:45:47 2004    United States
39) Xeir     1242    2.477 years    17 hr 28 min 20.8 sec    Sun Mar 7 21:47:03 2004    United States
40) Iceman     1238    1.218 years    8 hr 37 min 10.0 sec    Mon Oct 27 05:14:57 2003    United States
41) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
42) Kroma BaSyl    1129    5548 hr 26 min    4 hr 54 min 52.1 sec    Sat Oct 11 14:26:50 2003    United States
43) lapt    1076    1.095 years    8 hr 54 min 48.1 sec    Wed Mar 17 20:13:16 2004    United States
44) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
45) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
46) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
47) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
48) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
49) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
50) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
51) Daniel     695    1.190 years    14 hr 59 min 58.4 sec    Wed Mar 17 17:33:07 2004    United States
52) davezzzz    678    7598 hr 32 min    11 hr 12 min 26.2 sec    Wed Mar 17 05:26:49 2004    United States
53) Harlequin     621    4614 hr 18 min    7 hr 25 min 49.5 sec    Wed Oct 1 19:41:36 2003    United Kingdom
54) thirdleg     601    2758 hr 38 min    4 hr 35 min 24.3 sec    Fri Feb 6 03:35:28 2004    United States
55) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
56) TalonClaw     579    1.461 years    22 hr 06 min 07.3 sec    Fri Feb 27 17:03:43 2004    United States
57) Toasty0    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
58) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids     546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
59) Speaker to Aliens     500    8402 hr 09 min    16 hr 48 min 15.5 sec    Sun Dec 7 01:05:53 2003    United Kingdom
60) Ogma     485    5957 hr 47 min    12 hr 17 min 02.7 sec    Wed Mar 17 20:47:10 2004    United States
61) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
62) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
63) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
64) Towelie     406    4316 hr 02 min    10 hr 37 min 50.2 sec    Sat Feb 28 04:30:36 2004    United States
65) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
66) Tanked_Up     397    4973 hr 51 min    12 hr 31 min 42.9 sec    Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2003    United Kingdom
67) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
68) Lancer of TAC     311    4673 hr 17 min    15 hr 01 min 35.9 sec    Tue Dec 2 04:57:06 2003    United States
69) Spectre     295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
70) awm3     287    2510 hr 14 min    8 hr 44 min 47.4 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:28:06 2004    Canada
71) Grimklink     280    1.044 years    32 hr 40 min 25.4 sec    Mon Mar 15 13:44:10 2004    United States
72) Captain_Krenn     280    4547 hr 47 min    16 hr 14 min 31.5 sec    Fri Mar 5 05:39:16 2004    United States
73) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
74) Rick Regan     278    3475 hr 08 min    12 hr 30 min 01.7 sec    Thu Jan 23 18:57:39 2003    United States
75) SPQR Kremen     275    1688 hr 36 min    6 hr 08 min 25.5 sec    Tue Mar 16 11:23:12 2004    Australia
76) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
77) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
78) Otenki     184    1072 hr 48 min    5 hr 49 min 49.7 sec    Sun Nov 23 14:10:42 2003    Canada
79) jimmythehat    183    1930 hr 48 min    10 hr 33 min 02.9 sec    Mon Dec 29 05:10:33 2003    United States
80) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
81) TAG-Draco     172    1678 hr 13 min    9 hr 45 min 25.8 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:28:17 2004    United States
82) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
83) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
84) Max     158    2447 hr 32 min    15 hr 29 min 26.8 sec    Wed Mar 17 08:13:16 2004    United Kingdom
85) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
86) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
87) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
88) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
89) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
90) Chrisr118     133    748 hr 46 min    5 hr 37 min 47.5 sec    Tue Apr 29 09:44:50 2003    Canada
91) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
92) keravnos     116    2030 hr 45 min    17 hr 30 min 23.3 sec    Wed Mar 17 23:43:57 2004    Greece
93) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
94) Matsukasi     115    6326 hr 12 min    55 hr 00 min 37.9 sec    Sun Mar 14 01:58:36 2004    United States
95) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
96) clintk     96    902 hr 24 min    9 hr 24 min 00.6 sec    Thu Mar 11 08:13:53 2004    United Kingdom
97) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
98) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
99) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
100) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
101) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
102) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
103) Orthae     78    1130 hr 47 min    14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec    Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002    United States
104) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
105) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
106) Lairis     75    829 hr 42 min    11 hr 03 min 46.2 sec    Fri Mar 12 01:31:41 2004    United States
107) Sakrot     71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
108) Rob     62    1433 hr 05 min    23 hr 06 min 52.0 sec    Thu Oct 2 05:12:26 2003    United States
109) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
110) Apocolypse     52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
111) GreenLantern    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
112) sirgod     48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
113) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
114) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
115) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
116) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
117) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
118) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
119) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
120) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
121) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
122) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
123) Tus     24    912 hr 22 min    38 hr 00 min 56.5 sec    Mon Aug 18 16:21:37 2003    United States
124) F9thTheJudge     23    856 hr 36 min    37 hr 14 min 37.5 sec    Tue Mar 9 13:55:38 2004    United States
125) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
126)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
127) Hilton     17    620 hr 39 min    36 hr 30 min 33.1 sec    Mon Mar 15 16:17:08 2004    United States
128) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
129) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
130) SFCSpoonman     16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
131) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
132) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
133) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
134) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
135) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
136) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
137) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
138) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
139) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
140) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
141) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
142) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
143) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
144) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
145) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
146) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
147) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
148) FRA_C_Blade_XC     3    22 hr 18 min    7 hr 26 min 11.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:20:43 2004    United States
149) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
150) Beanardo     2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
151) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
152) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
153) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
154) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
155) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
156) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 12:41:05 am
Quote:

Welcome here Age, If you have broadband, then Please sign up, and help the taldren team out. I know you can do It with dial up, But It does help for prossesing alot of WU's.

stephen  




You don't need broadband if you use the SETIDriver setup I posted.  I did 49WUs yesterday and my current 7 day average is 43.6/day and I am on dialup.

I should probably check the links in that message to see if they are still current and if not post an update.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 01:24:20 am
Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 18, 2004, 06:42:12 am
What is a SETI?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 09:25:04 am
Quote:

What is a SETI?  




     
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on March 18, 2004, 09:30:24 am
Quote:

What is a SETI?  




Search for Extra - Terrestrial Intelligence.

Having found none on the forum, we have decided to look elsewhere

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 09:41:45 am
57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 18, 2004, 10:17:27 am
Quote:

57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 




Thinking of starting up again? We could use your output!    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 10:21:21 am
I have...but I'm still just one machine fighting against the odds...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 06:11:14 pm
Quote:

Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  




I will see about fixing it this weekend. Thanks.  It needs to be transferred to this forum anyhow.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 19, 2004, 05:08:59 am
I still don't understand.

What's with the time and date?

How does it work?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 19, 2004, 06:46:48 am
Quote:

57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 




This person is ranked in 57th place in the Taldren team.
His user name is ToastyO.
He has completed 557 SETI workunits.
His computer(s) spent 3056 hours and 19 minutes crunching these workunits.
5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec is the average time spent on each workunit.
Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003  was the last time he turned in results for processed workunits.
The country is identified because this project has participants from around the world.  
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 19, 2004, 08:33:57 pm
 Funny thing is that for nearly 2 years I haven't been able to run SETI. And I am still #61.  

 I wonder what I would need to do to get it started again on my laptop here. hmmm....  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 19, 2004, 09:48:10 pm
Quote:

Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  




Update made.  

Quote:

I have...but I'm still just one machine fighting against the odds...
Jerry  





That is how I started.  Before The Great Moo Hunt.  Now I have four.  

Link to SETI FAQ

What is SETI @ Home? (abbreviated SAH)

SAH  is a distributed computing project designed to analyze signals recieved by the radio telescope at Arecibo looking for signs of alien intelligence.   Each computer in the project downloads data packets (commonly referred to as Work Units or WUs), processes the WU using either a commandline client (fastest) or a screen saver client (slowest).  SAH is an actual scientific research project running out of the University of Berkeley (SETI Homepage).  

As of earlier today SAH has 4,925,491 total users.  Unfortunately about 1/3 or them never processed a single WU.    
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 20, 2004, 12:14:32 am

  After a year and a half off,  I finally rejoined Team Taldren.
*applause and cheering in background)

  So shortly I will be chompin away at them work units. Too bad my MIS on base won't let me run it on the gov't comp.
 Anywaym what is sad is that either I don't remember my email addy from that far back or Seti deleted it after being inactive for so long. In either case, my first goal is to beat myself.
*snicker*
 

 Nevermind. I had a Beavis and Butthead moment.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 20, 2004, 09:27:13 am
Nem,

I'm experiencing issues with the Seti Client running on my machine. Not sure what it is yet, but one of the things is I think it is using up all my resources even though I have it set for "low".

ack!

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 20, 2004, 11:58:03 am
1/ What OS are you using?

2/ Did you use my SETIDriver set up?

3/ Symptoms?  All programs or only some (which programs have you tried?)

 
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 20, 2004, 07:14:31 pm
Now at 142 and climbing. whoo hoo!!! I figure by May I should overtake my old spot of #61  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 02:08:51 am
Quote:

1/ What OS are you using?

2/ Did you use my SETIDriver set up?

3/ Symptoms?  All programs or only some (which programs have you tried?)

   




I may have found it. Seems that NeroBurns INCd packet writing software likes to conflict with several other programs including McAfee's virus detection software. So, this may also be suspect in regards to the SETI CLI. I'll let you know after a couple days of testing/running.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 06:35:37 am
Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 07:40:56 am
Quote:

Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?  




Essentially correct.  One thing to add however is if you are the lucky one to do the processing that finds ET you will be publicly credited with it.  Your 15 minutes of fame.  

My Data:

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    16613
Total CPU Time    7.107 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 44 min 51.0 sec
Average results received per day    20.99
Last result returned:   Sun Mar 21 13:30:59 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   2.168 years
Your group info:
You belong to the group named:    Taldren
You are not currently the founder of any teams.
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 4927160 total users is:    8125th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    2
You have completed more work units than    99.835% of our users.

There are other projects that use the SETI concept to do other research.  Cancer and Anthrax research for example.   SETI was merely first and biggest.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 09:45:45 am
Quote:

Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?  




Now only that, but in your case you might actually find Star Man.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 12:30:24 pm
But, of course, no one ever finds an ET.

Sooooooooooooo, why do you do this?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on March 21, 2004, 01:16:03 pm
I think that some people do it in the hope that someone will ultimately find a signal. Others might just do it o be a part of a group of like minded people. There are also some who just like the challenge of trying to work their way up through the ranks and try to get to the top of th list. Iin this group alone there were a number of people had an informal, or formal, race to see who could produce the most. That lead to quite a few races that ultimately increased the performance of the group and also lead to people learning more about the computers they used and how to get the most out of them. I distinctly remember people building totally new computers just sothey would have much better processing times.   Anyway, there are many reasons people joined the group.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 21, 2004, 01:49:40 pm
   

As you can see the Arecibo Radio Telescope only covers a fraction of the sky. Every red dot is a potential signal, however unlikely, where ET might be found. ET might be found in another part of the sky or ET's signal might not reach Earth for another thousand years. Who really knows? We certainly won't find him if we don't look.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 03:16:12 pm
Ok, I understand now.

<backs out of room.... turns and runs>
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 10:04:58 pm
Quote:

But, of course, no one ever finds an ET.

Sooooooooooooo, why do you do this?  




No one has to date.  

Of course there was a time when people were told the same about hunting for the mythical city of Troy.  Then one day some one found it, it was not a myth afterall.  

Perhaps today will be the day SETI finds a signal.  But not if no one is looking.   I will keep looking for my mythical signal.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 11:20:55 pm
Quote:

Microsoft man funds ET search

March 21, 2004 - 1:52AM

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, one of the richest men on Earth, today pledged to donate $US13.5 million ($17.99 million) for research into extra-terrestrial life.

With the contribution, Allen will have given $US25 million ($33.32 million) for construction of the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), a network of 350 radio telescopes being built to find signs of life in space, said Thomas Pierson, director of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute.

The radio telescopes will measure the density of the early universe, the formation of stars and magnetic fields.

They will also be capable of searching for "possible signals from technologically advanced civilisations elsewhere in the galaxy," according to a SETI statement.

The announcement of Allen's donation coincided with the completion of the project's research and development phases, which Allen funded with an $US11.5 million ($15.33 million) donation.

The $US13.5 million donation will pay for the first two phases of construction of the ATA, according to the statement.

One network of 32 telescopes will be available for research by the end of 2004 and the entire network of 350 telescopes will be completed "late in the decade," it said.

SETI and the Radio Astronomy Laboratory of the University of California at Berkley teamed up for the ATA project.

"I am very excited to be supporting one of the world's most visionary efforts to seek basic answers to some of the fundamental question about our universe and what other civilisations may exist elsewhere," Allen said in a ceremony in Mountain View, California, where SETI is based.


 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 11:24:35 pm
oh, those evil MS bast'ds...how dare they promote progressive research. *gasp*

hehehehe...meanwhile in other news, Linux claims to have found another Kernal Sanders...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: ActiveX on March 22, 2004, 11:33:52 am
I'm looking now hehe...

I only got 4 WUs done sofar, but it took less than 18 hours for them...

To catch up to Raven though I'll need to build more than an FX-53 hehe...
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 22, 2004, 02:05:44 pm
Kick Butt Active!!!!


 I know what you are saying about Raven. lol. I doubt even the collective work of my bases antiquainted computers can catch that guy.

 Me... Right now I am just focused on beating Rick Knox(pneumonic81), Hawkeye and myself. Seems to be a bit more feasable.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 22, 2004, 06:37:47 pm
Quote:

oh, those evil MS bast'ds...how dare they promote progressive research. *gasp*

hehehehe...meanwhile in other news, Linux claims to have found another Kernal Sanders...  




Actually as I understand it Paul Allen left the company a long time ago.  Before they were known as evil bostiches.   Paul Allen is also the guy funding Spaceship One.   He seems to be more of a visionary and less a power seeker then his ex-partner Gates.  Unlike Gates he makes little or no effort to publicize his philanthropy.   He quietly does what he does without seeking public recognition.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 22, 2004, 06:46:34 pm
Spaceship one set to make second powered flight. Story is at space.com.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 23, 2004, 04:14:53 am
   What happened in the first powered flight? I thought that they lost it the first time.

Oh!!!
 I know I have been gone for almost 2 years, but what is the deal with the Taldrenite Haven? I recogonize some of the names from when Erik and the community first started the Taldren team, and what I think became the biggest or second biggest thread. I remember that monster Star Wars vs Star Trek thread might have been the biggest, oh and that plasma thread.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 23, 2004, 06:01:40 am
I see we picked up a couple of new names. Anybody spot who or where they are?  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 23, 2004, 08:10:58 am
Does anybody have an extra P4 400mhz lying around surplus to their needs? I am currently running a 1.5  and thought it might be a good time to upgrade.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: ActiveX on March 23, 2004, 08:52:00 am
I'm at 138th place right now...

136th now
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 23, 2004, 11:40:23 am
Dunno. I'm just Gate crashing at the moment. I will probably pick it up in a couple of months.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 23, 2004, 11:41:43 am
It crashed IIRC but they repaired the damage and fixed the issues that caused it.  As to the havens I think they moved thier groups comms to another forum at the TCS. I think they are still active. Some of thier members had a disagreement with enforcement of taldren forum rules and left. The rest followed the core over there but most are still active here just not regarding the havens.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 23, 2004, 02:59:10 pm
 Hey there...

  Well, I am new sort of. *snicker*
 Ok, not really. I have just been gone for a while (year and a half). I have that military thing going on.
 Currently my old SETI acct is #61 but my current one is #125 and creeping up.  I should be able to overtake Rick Knox at #121 in about 6 hours and then it is on to Hawkeye.  
 What ever happened to him or Xak Tsaroth?
 
Title: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 23, 2004, 07:22:35 pm
7) KD4     10003     5.393 years    4 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Tue Mar 23 23:43:09 2004    United States

Congratulations on joining the 5 figure club and on your new certificate.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 23, 2004, 07:32:57 pm
Quote:

   What happened in the first powered flight? I thought that they lost it the first time.

Oh!!!
 I know I have been gone for almost 2 years, but what is the deal with the Taldrenite Haven? I recogonize some of the names from when Erik and the community first started the Taldren team, and what I think became the biggest or second biggest thread. I remember that monster Star Wars vs Star Trek thread might have been the biggest, oh and that plasma thread.  




There was a landing gear malfunction.  Minimal damage.  We discussed it here at the time (see link below)

Link to thread  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 24, 2004, 02:07:01 pm
 Thanks Nem.
 I think the next cool thing as far as space goes is that we have a sattelite arriving at Saturn in June this year. It is supposed to have some probes go into the atmosphere of Titan.
 Cassini mission
  Anyway.... I am gradually movng up. It is a shame that so many people have gone inactive. But newcomers ActiveX and Cross are making great progress, infact I think cross will be passig me up tommorow. Good stuff.
   
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 24, 2004, 02:32:47 pm
Quote:

7) KD4     10003     5.393 years    4 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Tue Mar 23 23:43:09 2004    United States

Congratulations on joining the 5 figure club and on your new certificate.  






thanks. after all these years i finly make the 10,000 mark  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 24, 2004, 09:07:15 pm
Quote:


thanks. after all these years i finly make the 10,000 mark  




How many calendar years did it take?  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 25, 2004, 05:34:21 am
i started on may 17 1999. changed isp and forgot to get my password and had to start new account dec 29 1999. for some time i used a old 266. only in the last year did i start useing 2 computers.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 27, 2004, 12:25:08 am
Quote:

i started on may 17 1999. changed isp and forgot to get my password and had to start new account dec 29 1999. for some time i used a old 266. only in the last year did i start useing 2 computers.  




Nearly 5 years on SETI?  You are one of the old timers.  At just past two years I am rather a Johnny come lately.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 27, 2004, 05:12:43 am
lol ya i am a old timer. when i frist heard about it i could see the posabilty for future research in other fields. think of all the computers that set on screan saver all night. i tried some of the medical research a few years back but i found them to be to intrusive. with seti driver set on low i dont ever notice it taking away from what i am doing. i realy dont think our tech is far enough alone to where we have much of a chance to find anything.
If there is a more worthy project out there that will work like seti driver i would be willing to move to that if we did it as a team.
sorry but its 6 am and time for me to go to bed  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 28, 2004, 11:01:43 pm
Quote:

lol ya i am a old timer. when i frist heard about it i could see the posabilty for future research in other fields. think of all the computers that set on screan saver all night. i tried some of the medical research a few years back but i found them to be to intrusive. with seti driver set on low i dont ever notice it taking away from what i am doing. i realy dont think our tech is far enough alone to where we have much of a chance to find anything.

If there is a more worthy project out there that will work like seti driver i would be willing to move to that if we did it as a team.
sorry but its 6 am and time for me to go to bed  




We (as a team) were considering at one point what to do after SETI 1 ended and couldn't decide.  Some of the projects look interesting but many of us object to the proprietary nature of the programs.  Then again some of them allow the people behind the system to jump you to another project without even giving you a choice.  

I also don't think it likely that we will find anything.  But it is worth the chance.   The attempt has already proven the practicality of distributed volunteer processing to help scientific research.  

On a more personal level I just achieved a goal

 Your rank out of 4939040 total users is:    7994th place.  

Top 8000 and on to 7500.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: nexa1 on March 31, 2004, 02:46:19 pm
  You kick butt man.  So you are like now officially one of the big guns eh?
 
 I still think I will find ET before you.  NAH!
   
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: ActiveX on March 31, 2004, 04:55:32 pm
Im turning them out 1 about every 4 hours and 17 minutes, but you are faster at 3 hours and 39 minutes...

When I put together my uber crunching box, I'll be spittin 2 an hour hehe...
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 31, 2004, 05:12:35 pm
Quote:

  You kick butt man.  So you are like now officially one of the big guns eh?
 
 I still think I will find ET before you.  NAH!
   




Intermediate gun.  Guys like Raven are the big guns.  

Just so long as someone finds ET its all good.  

 
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: nexa1 on April 02, 2004, 06:21:05 pm
LOL...

 You are cool Nem.

On a side not, I should break the top 100 in about 12 hours.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: ActiveX on April 03, 2004, 02:47:48 am
I still got 40 to go till I get that far...
Title: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 03, 2004, 08:39:26 pm
Quote:

LOL...

 You are cool Nem.

On a side not, I should break the top 100 in about 12 hours.  




Quote:

99) nexa1     90    333 hr 25 min    3 hr 42 min 16.8 sec    Sun Apr 4 00:33:59 2004    United States




Congratulations on reaching that landmark.  Always nice to see someone moving up the ranks.    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: nexa1 on April 05, 2004, 05:36:06 am
 Well, it is a big one for me considering that it took so long to crunch units with my last computer.
 So these are my stats now.
62) nexa1   476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
98) nexa1     97   357 hr 52 min   3 hr 41 min 21.9 sec Mon Apr 5 07:53:19 2004 United States

 And check out ActiveX he's movin too. Whoo hoo!
110) ActiveX   68 291 hr 12 min 4 hr 16 min 57.2 sec Mon Apr 5 02:43:40 2004 United States

 I am not sure what happened to Cross here. He was doing so well, but I guess he had to stop for some reason. If he hadn't he wold have passed me already.
111) Cross   65 202 hr 22 min 3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004 United States

 So anything big going on with the team?
 
Oh hey Nemesis... what is your nations name?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 05, 2004, 04:03:02 pm
Well, I have just added a 350mhz P2 to the mix. My average time will probably start going up now.  It seems to be pushing them out about every 14 - 15 hours.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 05, 2004, 05:14:45 pm
Quote:

 Well, it is a big one for me considering that it took so long to crunch units with my last computer.
 So these are my stats now.
62) nexa1   476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
98) nexa1     97   357 hr 52 min   3 hr 41 min 21.9 sec Mon Apr 5 07:53:19 2004 United States

 And check out ActiveX he's movin too. Whoo hoo!
110) ActiveX   68 291 hr 12 min 4 hr 16 min 57.2 sec Mon Apr 5 02:43:40 2004 United States

 I am not sure what happened to Cross here. He was doing so well, but I guess he had to stop for some reason. If he hadn't he wold have passed me already.
111) Cross   65 202 hr 22 min 3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004 United States

 So anything big going on with the team?
 
Oh hey Nemesis... what is your nations name?




You mean my Nationstates nation?  If so I bet you feel silly now  

At present nothing "big" is going on.  Just a slow steady climb.    Feel free to start something.  Seriously, some of the highest points of activity came when two (or more) people were in a race up the ranks.    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 05, 2004, 05:25:52 pm
My nation is 14th for Compassionate...
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 05, 2004, 05:41:26 pm
Quote:

My nation is 14th for Compassionate...  




"IKV Nemesis is ranked 27th in the region and 116,781st in the world for Most Compassionate Citizens."

 What do you expect of a Klingon?    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 05, 2004, 05:43:12 pm
Oh nothing hehe, Im just a wee widdle nation of not even 30 million...
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: nexa1 on April 05, 2004, 09:33:20 pm

 lol

I just started yesterday. I'm puny  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 07, 2004, 09:25:09 pm
18) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States

20) RazalYllib   4170 4.107 years 8 hr 37 min 37.6 sec Wed Apr 7 16:04:19 2004 United States

21) SGM RAS   4160 6.991 years 14 hr 43 min 16.1 sec Wed Apr 7 18:12:27 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3648 1.610 years 3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004 United States

Finally got my 20 spot back.
My new box helped considerably.
Now how long can I stay?
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 07, 2004, 09:34:06 pm
Well looks like Chilidog will get you in maybe a quarter?
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 07, 2004, 09:45:03 pm
Quote:


 lol

I just started yesterday. I'm puny  




You have to start somewhere.

Persist and you will grow.  Rather like here on the SETI team.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 07, 2004, 09:46:18 pm
Quote:

18) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States

20) RazalYllib   4170 4.107 years 8 hr 37 min 37.6 sec Wed Apr 7 16:04:19 2004 United States

21) SGM RAS   4160 6.991 years 14 hr 43 min 16.1 sec Wed Apr 7 18:12:27 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3648 1.610 years 3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004 United States

Finally got my 20 spot back.
My new box helped considerably.
Now how long can I stay?  




How many work units a day do you produce?  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 08, 2004, 07:16:56 am
never enough...

With my new box,
I churn through approx 10WU every 2.5 days or so,

Wife's (my hand me down),
clunks along with about 5 in the same period of time.
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 09, 2004, 04:51:15 pm
Quote:

never enough...




Funny, but that is how I feel about my output.  I suspect that if I could match Raven I would still be looking for ways to boost it.

Quote:

With my new box,
I churn through approx 10WU every 2.5 days or so,

Wife's (my hand me down),
clunks along with about 5 in the same period of time.  




6/day, more than many others.  Should be enough to keep you in the top 20.  Keep on chugging away.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 09, 2004, 05:40:03 pm
Yeah I know

 just keep swimming, just keep swimming.....


Save my pennies for a new box and up my production is my next goal

 Keep trying to get my associates to install (with my acct) they just stare at me in utter disbelief when I try to explain Seti@Home and distributed computing.

Couple of them saw the screensaver, said it looked pretty, but I told them it goes quicker if you dont see it.
That also got vacent stares then,
If its not pretty, why should this be my screen saver ?

At this point I usually abandon the idea
Title: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 10, 2004, 02:06:06 am
 2) ICE Gambler     50049     42.860 years    7 hr 30 min 06.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 05:21:41 2004    United States  

That will be a nice certificate, one I don't expect to ever reach.      
Title: Re: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: The Postman on April 10, 2004, 08:13:45 am
Right now I am just trying to reach 10,000 before the switch.  I am not too sure how many boxes I will be able to keep online after the switch to BOINC.  
Title: Re: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: Gambler on April 10, 2004, 09:17:38 am
Quote:

 2) ICE Gambler     50049     42.860 years    7 hr 30 min 06.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 05:21:41 2004    United States  

That will be a nice certificate, one I don't expect to ever reach.      




Whoa, I have a confession to make, I've still got SETI running on my farm, but I haven't really been paying attention to it.

This is also a landmark I had never expected to receive.
Title: ActiveX moves into our top 100. Congratulations!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 11, 2004, 12:44:29 am
 100) ActiveX     91    387 hr 27 min    4 hr 15 min 28.3 sec    Sat Apr 10 23:31:06 2004    United States  

Part of the top 100 and soon to be in the triple digits.  Keep it up.  
Title: Re: ActiveX moves into our top 100. Congratulations!
Post by: ActiveX on April 11, 2004, 06:34:38 am
:P
Title: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 11, 2004, 11:25:11 am
Team Stats

Description Taldren, "the Art and Science of Gaming". Creators of "StarFleet Command II : Empires at War" and "Orion Pirates".
Members 138
Results received 165387
Total CPU time 182.040 years
Founder Kenneth Yeast

Top Members:

Name (and URL) Results
received Total CPU time Average CPU time
per work unit Date Last Result Received Country
1) Raven 16736 10.064 years 5 hr 16 min 03.4 sec Fri Jan 17 01:52:39 2003 United States
2) Phillip Showel 16298 16.755 years 9 hr 00 min 19.9 sec Fri Jan 17 01:12:21 2003 United States
3) Cyberkada 15660 7.479 years 4 hr 11 min 01.4 sec Fri Jan 17 00:35:29 2003 United States
4) ICE Gambler 11897 11.143 years 8 hr 12 min 16.3 sec Fri Jan 17 01:46:49 2003 United States
5) Max Peck 8753 6.311 years 6 hr 18 min 59.3 sec Thu Jan 16 23:03:31 2003 Canada
6) Bryan Kinney 4985 3.424 years 6 hr 01 min 01.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:06:50 2003 United States
7) Dragon93 4980 8.292 years 14 hr 35 min 10.0 sec Fri Jan 17 00:20:32 2003 United States
8) Rogue Jedi 4800 5.127 years 9 hr 21 min 27.0 sec Thu Nov 14 17:10:31 2002 United States
9) Mazeppa 4575 6.196 years 11 hr 51 min 49.8 sec Thu Jan 16 23:38:20 2003 United States
10) Sven Forkbeard 4298 6.565 years 13 hr 22 min 46.1 sec Wed Jan 15 23:08:39 2003 United States
11) Noah Wallace 3882 4.842 years 10 hr 55 min 38.6 sec Fri Jan 17 01:08:00 2003 United States
12) Death Merchant 3857 8.847 years 20 hr 05 min 34.4 sec Thu Jan 16 15:13:51 2003 United States
13) moofighters 3829 6.051 years 13 hr 50 min 38.4 sec Fri Jan 17 00:40:23 2003 United States
14) Kenneth Yeast 3636 4.515 years 10 hr 52 min 42.5 sec Fri Jan 17 01:23:42 2003 United States
15) SGM RAS 3340 6.002 years 15 hr 44 min 27.9 sec Thu Jan 16 21:38:48 2003 United States
16) IKV Nemesis  3223 1.686 years 4 hr 34 min 55.9 sec Fri Jan 17 02:00:38 2003 Canada
17) Renegade001 2736 2.911 years 9 hr 19 min 15.6 sec Thu Jan 16 22:24:45 2003 United States
18) KBF-Dogmatix 2470 2.910 years 10 hr 19 min 15.4 sec Thu Jan 16 20:22:56 2003 United States
19) Ronbo 2466 2.036 years 7 hr 13 min 52.2 sec Thu Jan 16 17:36:30 2003 United States
20) Lobo 2282 2.574 years 9 hr 52 min 44.9 sec Thu Jan 16 03:21:08 2003 United States
21) Intrepid-XC 2267 2.329 years 8 hr 59 min 57.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:31:34 2003 United States
22) MagnumMan 2192 4.157 years 16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002 United States
23) Nasim 1872 6865 hr 30 min 3 hr 40 min 02.8 sec Tue Jan 14 13:29:07 2003 Canada
24) JAFO 1852 2.377 years 11 hr 14 min 42.9 sec Mon Jan 6 13:21:52 2003 United States
25) RazalYllib 1835 2.393 years 11 hr 25 min 23.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:47:38 2003 United States
26) Fahrenheit 1776 3.776 years 18 hr 37 min 23.1 sec Fri Jan 17 01:59:46 2003 United States
27) RedHotChiliDog 1713 6559 hr 22 min 3 hr 49 min 45.0 sec Fri Jan 17 01:06:54 2003 United States
28) ChAotiCIllusion 1575 7350 hr 10 min 4 hr 40 min 00.4 sec Thu Jan 16 19:57:48 2003 United Kingdom
29) Jim 1333 1.256 years 8 hr 15 min 06.6 sec Thu Jan 16 23:15:37 2003 United States
30) hobbesmaster 1274 1.021 years 7 hr 01 min 15.4 sec Wed Jan 15 05:17:23 2003 United States
31) Edge10 1101 1.678 years 13 hr 21 min 01.5 sec Thu Jan 16 21:04:58 2003 United States
32) jualdeaux 1003 7938 hr 10 min 7 hr 54 min 51.9 sec Mon Jan 13 03:42:37 2003 United States
33) Bill Castner 913 7477 hr 25 min 8 hr 11 min 23.8 sec Thu Jan 16 21:15:20 2003 United States
34) Aldaron 911 1.289 years 12 hr 23 min 41.1 sec Wed Jan 15 04:18:40 2003 United States
35) John Cencerik 896 1.858 years 18 hr 10 min 11.0 sec Thu Jan 16 11:27:20 2003 United States
36) Zach 870 1.083 years 10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002 United States
37) Michal 753 1.542 years 17 hr 56 min -0.0 sec Thu Jan 9 03:58:14 2003 United States
38) Erik Bethke 746 7244 hr 23 min 9 hr 42 min 39.5 sec Fri Jan 10 01:57:07 2003 United States
39) anarwally 729 2.195 years 26 hr 22 min 16.6 sec Thu Jan 16 12:03:15 2003 United States
40) bupson 710 7851 hr 23 min 11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002 United States
41) Corben Dallas 671 6593 hr 41 min 9 hr 49 min 35.9 sec Thu Jan 16 23:11:49 2003 United States
42) Iceman 667 5988 hr 09 min 8 hr 58 min 39.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:34:12 2003 United States
43) Xeir 645 1.283 years 17 hr 25 min 09.4 sec Fri Jan 17 01:52:28 2003 United States
44) f9TH SIR X 597 5833 hr 42 min 9 hr 46 min 18.1 sec Thu Jan 16 21:42:23 2003 New Zealand
45) AJTK 582 7085 hr 39 min 12 hr 10 min 28.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:03:48 2003 United States
46) Michael Malin 575 1.819 years 27 hr 42 min 26.9 sec Thu Jan 16 18:55:58 2003 United States
47) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids 491 1.538 years 27 hr 25 min 58.2 sec Thu Jan 16 05:02:10 2003 United States
48) Sethan 490 5083 hr 54 min 10 hr 22 min 31.1 sec Thu Jan 16 22:44:25 2003 United States
49) nexa1 476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
50) Reffet 451 5520 hr 42 min 12 hr 14 min 27.7 sec Thu Jan 16 09:21:27 2003 United States
51) hawkmoon 444 2342 hr 16 min 5 hr 16 min 31.4 sec Fri Nov 1 22:17:46 2002 Netherlands
52) Speaker to Aliens 419 7073 hr 10 min 16 hr 52 min 51.8 sec Fri Jul 26 20:36:29 2002 United Kingdom
53) Ed Lacabanne 418 5781 hr 12 min 13 hr 49 min 50.2 sec Thu Jan 16 21:10:18 2003 United States
54) hawkeye 400 2915 hr 47 min 7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002 United States
55) Kor 373 2212 hr 20 min 5 hr 55 min 52.3 sec Fri Nov 15 08:13:53 2002 United States
56) Hollis J. Wood 371 5365 hr 55 min 14 hr 27 min 48.2 sec Thu Jan 16 18:14:51 2003 Canada
57) Harlequin 370 2234 hr 04 min 6 hr 02 min 16.8 sec Wed Jan 15 20:57:16 2003 United Kingdom
58) BobGraham 360 1836 hr 57 min 5 hr 06 min 09.5 sec Fri Jan 17 00:00:19 2003 United States
59) Mark P. 325 4350 hr 40 min 13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002 United States
60) Tanked_Up 318 3973 hr 32 min 12 hr 29 min 43.4 sec Mon Jan 13 18:26:05 2003 United Kingdom
61) Lancer of TAC 297 4498 hr 56 min 15 hr 08 min 52.6 sec Mon Dec 30 20:36:23 2002 United States
62) Spectre 295 4819 hr 05 min 16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002 United States
63) Rick Regan 269 3378 hr 00 min 12 hr 33 min 27.5 sec Wed Oct 30 19:08:54 2002 United States
64) TalonClaw 253 6880 hr 03 min 27 hr 11 min 38.0 sec Thu Jan 16 21:38:50 2003 United States
65) Grith 195 3451 hr 48 min 17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002 United States
66) Daniel 194 2871 hr 16 min 14 hr 48 min 01.3 sec Thu Jan 16 21:19:32 2003 United States
67) Grimklink 193 6281 hr 54 min 32 hr 32 min 55.5 sec Wed Jan 15 21:49:39 2003 United States
68) David T. Potter 187 1.652 years 77 hr 23 min 14.1 sec Wed Jan 15 06:09:28 2003 United States
69) Traigus 161 3291 hr 59 min 20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002 United States
70) Professional 157 4502 hr 15 min 28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002 Canada
71) Patgod 157 1770 hr 51 min 11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002 United States
72) jimmythehat 153 1570 hr 52 min 10 hr 16 min 01.6 sec Mon Dec 30 14:27:27 2002 United States
73) Alien 3490 147 2758 hr 23 min 18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999 United States
74) Captain_Krenn 120 2044 hr 35 min 17 hr 02 min 17.9 sec Thu Jan 16 16:02:37 2003 United States
75) Grin 117 2341 hr 01 min 20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002 United States
76) Durin 116 1458 hr 04 min 12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002 United States
77) SPQR Kremen 116 879 hr 49 min 7 hr 35 min 04.8 sec Fri Jan 10 03:14:22 2003 Australia
78) DaewAnahos 105 1084 hr 52 min 10 hr 19 min 55.7 sec Thu Jan 16 12:47:15 2003 United States
79) Matolck 91 1736 hr 37 min 19 hr 05 min 01.8 sec Sun Apr 7 07:08:41 2002 France
80) NMZmaster 88 2229 hr 37 min 25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002 United States
81) Tx PnGwin 82 2552 hr 14 min 31 hr 07 min 29.7 sec Sun Jan 12 03:34:16 2003 United States
82) Towelie 80 962 hr 41 min 12 hr 02 min 01.1 sec Wed Dec 4 11:33:40 2002 United States
83) Redshift 79 856 hr 42 min 10 hr 50 min 39.8 sec Thu Sep 5 22:57:02 2002 United Kingdom
84) Orthae 78 1130 hr 47 min 14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002 United States
85) Kevin Luker 78 1138 hr 40 min 14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002 United States
86) Sakrot 71 1377 hr 44 min 19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002 United States
87) JoeRad 62 882 hr 15 min 14 hr 13 min 47.7 sec Wed Jan 8 14:11:29 2003 United States
88) Mentat Jon 62 1315 hr 01 min 21 hr 12 min 36.5 sec Fri Jan 17 01:11:10 2003 United States
89) sirgod 48 772 hr 06 min 16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002 United States
90) sfcjb 47 280 hr 02 min 5 hr 57 min 30.0 sec Thu Jan 16 20:59:42 2003 United States
91) PsychadelicSwinger 45 986 hr 55 min 21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002 United States
92) Toasty0 45 500 hr 26 min 11 hr 07 min 15.3 sec Thu Jan 16 23:58:45 2003 United States
93) Erik Bethke 43 1847 hr 42 min 42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999 United States
94) GreenLantern 43 787 hr 57 min 18 hr 19 min 29.1 sec Thu Jan 16 18:59:22 2003 United States
95) TerranceRoff 41 847 hr 06 min 20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002 United States
96) 3dot14 39 1313 hr 02 min 33 hr 40 min 03.4 sec Sat Dec 14 15:40:10 2002 Canada
97) The Postman 39 277 hr 36 min 7 hr 07 min 04.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:56:30 2003 United States
98) Tantalus 37 692 hr 35 min 18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002 United Kingdom
99) EE 32 652 hr 46 min 20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002 United States
100) Tim 31 1858 hr 34 min 59 hr 57 min 15.1 sec Wed Jan 15 05:00:12 2003 United States
101) Alien 3491 30 1876 hr 11 min 62 hr 32 min 23.9 sec Sun Nov 28 04:26:13 1999 United States
102) Overloaded Ferrets 29 1138 hr 16 min 39 hr 15 min 02.9 sec Wed Jan 15 12:29:01 2003 United States
103) pneumonic81 25 846 hr 53 min 33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002 United States
104) clintk 25 267 hr 31 min 10 hr 42 min 03.2 sec Mon Jan 13 17:13:31 2003 United Kingdom
105) FMMonty 23 355 hr 17 min 15 hr 26 min 51.5 sec Fri Jan 25 17:29:26 2002 United Kingdom
106) Otenki 23 172 hr 21 min 7 hr 29 min 37.9 sec Sun Jul 7 14:39:08 2002 Canada
107) 5of12 19 128 hr 53 min 6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001 United States
108) FPF-DarkElf 16 861 hr 43 min 53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002 United States
109) SFCSpoonman 16 149 hr 12 min 9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002 United States
110) Robert J Hendry Jr 12 259 hr 45 min 21 hr 38 min 45.7 sec Sun Jun 23 00:22:15 2002 United States
111) Hilton 10 506 hr 01 min 50 hr 36 min 10.9 sec Sat Aug 3 23:54:41 2002 United States
112) BlackJackal 9 698 hr 59 min 77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002 United States
113) Baron Jukaga 8 277 hr 45 min 34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002 Canada
114) MazeppaTest1 8 163 hr 38 min 20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002 United States
115) Jester_Taldren 7 243 hr 32 min 34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001 United States
116) pj lynn 6 234 hr 06 min 39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001 United States
117) Lairis 6 62 hr 52 min 10 hr 28 min 41.7 sec Fri Aug 23 05:54:28 2002 United States
118) Jinxx 5 328 hr 16 min 65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001 United States
119) Obmanta 5 178 hr 47 min 35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002 United States
120) Chili_of_Borg 5 62 hr 53 min 12 hr 34 min 46.3 sec Thu Jan 16 21:55:17 2003 United States
121) Bolitho 4 183 hr 32 min 45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001 United States
122) Catnip_inc 4 353 hr 41 min 88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002 United States
123) GolferDJ 4 89 hr 47 min 22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002 United States
124) Kirk_jr 3 128 hr 22 min 42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000 United States
125) MindBlip 3 39 hr 40 min 13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001 United States
126) Joshua Babb 3 211 hr 29 min 70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001 United States
127) Beanardo 2 30 hr 49 min 15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001 United States
128) GFL-I-Demandred 2 64 hr 46 min 32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002 United Kingdom
129) ArticFire 2 16 hr 25 min 8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002 United States
130) Speaker to Aliens 1 29 hr 40 min 29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999 United Kingdom
131) SKINWALKER 1 61 hr 15 min 61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001 United States
132) Wulgaru 1 9 hr 44 min 9 hr 44 min 58.8 sec Sun Dec 16 18:47:40 2001 Canada
     
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 11, 2004, 08:46:21 pm
You had to dig to find that list. I was in the 97th spot with 39 WU's completed. I have come a long way since then.  
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: GE-Raven on April 12, 2004, 08:03:54 am
Congrats Gambler on the 50K mark... Very cool!!!

And wow that list is blast from the past.  16K units... When I was at "full steam" that would take me about 6 weeks.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: ActiveX on April 12, 2004, 04:58:44 pm
When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 12, 2004, 05:10:10 pm
Quote:

When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'  




The server is down and I can't check the individual stats either. It's them.  
Title: That was then this is now. :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 12, 2004, 07:09:45 pm
Quote:

Quote:

When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'  




The server is down and I can't check the individual stats either. It's them.  




Taldren
Last updated: Mon Apr 12 17:06:11 2004 UTC

Description   Taldren, "the Art and Science of Gaming". Creators of "StarFleet Command II : Empires at War" and "Orion Pirates".
Members   169, Results received   573485, Total CPU time   443.920 years
Founder   Kenneth Yeast

Top Members:
Name (and URL)    Results received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     261969    155.111 years    5 hr 11 min 12.3 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:44:52 2004    United States
2) ICE Gambler     50186    42.953 years    7 hr 29 min 50.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 08:25:43 2004    United States
3) Phillip Showel     31712    27.663 years    7 hr 38 min 29.7 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:48:36 2004    United States
4) Dragon93     22711    30.676 years    11 hr 49 min 56.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:16:10 2004    United States
5) IKV Nemesis     17578    7.472 years    3 hr 43 min 24.5 sec    Tue Apr 13 00:04:58 2004    Canada
6) Max Peck     14818    8.932 years    5 hr 16 min 49.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:32:25 2004    Canada
7) KD4     10321    5.496 years    4 hr 39 min 52.2 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:03:45 2004    United States
8) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
9) Dizzy is Still a Snot     9192    11.552 years    11 hr 00 min 31.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:17:45 2004    United States
10) Kenneth Yeast     8954    7.343 years    7 hr 11 min 01.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:20:45 2004    United States
11) Noah Wallace III    8651    7.531 years    7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec    Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004    United States
12) ChAotiCIllusion     7893    3.010 years    3 hr 20 min 25.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 14:52:41 2004    United Kingdom
13) Nasim    7402    3.019 years    3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec    Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003    Canada
14) The Postman     5924    3.468 years    5 hr 07 min 42.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:54:26 2004    United States
15) KBF-Dogmatix     5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
16) Intrepid-XC     5443    4.742 years    7 hr 37 min 51.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 05:33:25 2004    United States
17) Sven Forkbeard     4948    7.257 years    12 hr 50 min 53.7 sec    Sun Mar 28 16:19:15 2004    United States
18) Fahrenheit    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
19) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
20) RazalYllib     4218    4.131 years    8 hr 34 min 41.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:49:39 2004    United States
21) SGM RAS     4174    7.005 years    14 hr 42 min 04.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:18:06 2004    United States
22) RedHotChiliDog    3648    1.610 years    3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec    Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004    United States
23) Bill Castner     3461    2.365 years    5 hr 59 min 13.1 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:00:40 2004    United States
24) Ronbo     3394    2.738 years    7 hr 03 min 58.2 sec    Sun Apr 11 23:23:46 2004    United States
25) f9TH SIR X     3366    2.618 years    6 hr 48 min 44.5 sec    Sun Apr 11 21:12:14 2004    New Zealand
26) digi    3311    1.355 years    3 hr 35 min 04.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:17:55 2004    United Kingdom
27) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
28) Jim     3015    2.399 years    6 hr 58 min 08.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:39:30 2004    United States
29) hobbesmaster     2689    1.645 years    5 hr 21 min 29.2 sec    Tue Apr 6 10:14:39 2004    United States
30) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
31) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
32) Reffet     2128    1.602 years    6 hr 35 min 44.7 sec    Tue Mar 23 00:51:11 2004    United States
33) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
34) BobGraham     1910    1.201 years    5 hr 30 min 37.5 sec    Mon Apr 12 04:19:58 2004    United States
35) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
36) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
37) Hollis J. Wood    1750    1.367 years    6 hr 50 min 31.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 19:30:56 2004    Canada
38) Malystryx_XC     1430    1.600 years    9 hr 48 min 05.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 02:35:14 2004    United States
39) Xeir     1274    2.502 years    17 hr 12 min 23.3 sec    Sun Apr 11 17:23:08 2004    United States
40) lapt    1246    1.202 years    8 hr 27 min 04.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:08:09 2004    United States
41) Iceman     1238    1.218 years    8 hr 37 min 10.0 sec    Mon Oct 27 05:14:57 2003    United States
42) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
43) Kroma BaSyl    1129    5548 hr 26 min    4 hr 54 min 52.1 sec    Sat Oct 11 14:26:50 2003    United States
44) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
45) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
46) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
47) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
48) AJTK     856    1.146 years    11 hr 43 min 54.6 sec    Sun Apr 11 01:41:52 2004    United States
49) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
50) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
51) Daniel     706    1.210 years    15 hr 00 min 33.5 sec    Fri Apr 9 15:48:52 2004    United States
52) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
53) davezzzz    697    8189 hr 54 min    11 hr 45 min 00.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:19:58 2004    United States
54) Harlequin     621    4614 hr 18 min    7 hr 25 min 49.5 sec    Wed Oct 1 19:41:36 2003    United Kingdom
55) thirdleg     602    2763 hr 41 min    4 hr 35 min 27.0 sec    Mon Apr 5 03:36:56 2004    United States
56) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
57) TalonClaw     580    1.464 years    22 hr 06 min 14.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 13:48:42 2004    United States
58) Toasty0    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
59) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids     546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
60) Ogma     505    6276 hr 36 min    12 hr 25 min 44.1 sec    Wed Mar 31 01:08:12 2004    United States
61) Speaker to Aliens     500    8402 hr 09 min    16 hr 48 min 15.5 sec    Sun Dec 7 01:05:53 2003    United Kingdom
62) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
63) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
64) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
65) Towelie     406    4316 hr 02 min    10 hr 37 min 50.2 sec    Sat Feb 28 04:30:36 2004    United States
66) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
67) Tanked_Up     397    4973 hr 51 min    12 hr 31 min 42.9 sec    Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2003    United Kingdom
68) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
69) Lancer of TAC     312    4683 hr 08 min    15 hr 00 min 36.2 sec    Fri Mar 26 18:26:57 2004    United States
70) Spectre     295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
71) Captain_Krenn     289    4610 hr 43 min    15 hr 57 min 14.6 sec    Fri Apr 9 17:07:57 2004    United States
72) awm3     288    2515 hr 47 min    8 hr 44 min 07.3 sec    Sat Mar 27 03:26:17 2004    Canada
73) Grimklink     285    1.063 years    32 hr 40 min 29.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:21:54 2004    United States
74) SPQR Kremen     283    1729 hr 40 min    6 hr 06 min 42.8 sec    Sat Apr 10 01:07:27 2004    Australia
75) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
76) Rick Regan     278    3475 hr 08 min    12 hr 30 min 01.7 sec    Thu Jan 23 18:57:39 2003    United States
77) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
78) TAG-Draco     207    1924 hr 12 min    9 hr 17 min 44.5 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:00:12 2004    United States
79) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
80) Otenki     184    1072 hr 48 min    5 hr 49 min 49.7 sec    Sun Nov 23 14:10:42 2003    Canada
81) jimmythehat    183    1930 hr 48 min    10 hr 33 min 02.9 sec    Mon Dec 29 05:10:33 2003    United States
82) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
83) Max     173    2699 hr 59 min    15 hr 36 min 24.7 sec    Mon Apr 12 17:26:52 2004    United Kingdom
84) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
85) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
86) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
87) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
88) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
89) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
90) Chrisr118     146    839 hr 57 min    5 hr 45 min 11.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:57:43 2004    Canada
91) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
92) nexa1     136    497 hr 23 min    3 hr 39 min 26.2 sec    Mon Apr 12 19:39:11 2004    United States
93) keravnos     123    2092 hr 30 min    17 hr 00 min 43.9 sec    Wed Apr 7 07:16:39 2004    Greece
94) Matsukasi     121    6657 hr 04 min    55 hr 01 min 01.7 sec    Wed Apr 7 11:09:53 2004    United States
95) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
96) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
97) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
98) clintk     101    951 hr 59 min    9 hr 25 min 32.3 sec    Thu Apr 8 10:45:55 2004    United Kingdom
99) ActiveX     96    408 hr 22 min    4 hr 15 min 14.3 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:19:18 2004    United States
100) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
101) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
102) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
103) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
104) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
105) Lairis     80    887 hr 53 min    11 hr 05 min 55.0 sec    Sun Apr 11 17:53:28 2004    United States
106) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
107) Orthae     78    1130 hr 47 min    14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec    Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002    United States
108) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
109) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
110) Sakrot     71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
111) Cross     65    202 hr 22 min    3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec    Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004    United States
112) Rob     62    1433 hr 05 min    23 hr 06 min 52.0 sec    Thu Oct 2 05:12:26 2003    United States
113) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
114) Apocolypse     52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
115) GreenLantern    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
116) sirgod     48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
117) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
118) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
119) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
120) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
121) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
122) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
123) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
124) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
125) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
126) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
127) F9thTheJudge     25    931 hr 15 min    37 hr 15 min 01.9 sec    Wed Mar 31 17:20:06 2004    United States
128) Tus     24    912 hr 22 min    38 hr 00 min 56.5 sec    Mon Aug 18 16:21:37 2003    United States
129) Hilton     20    670 hr 50 min    33 hr 32 min 31.2 sec    Wed Apr 7 23:23:10 2004    United States
130) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
131)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
132) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
133) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
134) SFCSpoonman     16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
135) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
136) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
137) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
138) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
139) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
140) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
141) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
142) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
143) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
144) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
145) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
146) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
147) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
148) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
149) FRA_C_Blade_XC     4    31 hr 48 min    7 hr 57 min 01.0 sec    Fri Mar 19 03:22:30 2004    United States
150) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
151) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
152) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
153) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
154) Beanardo     2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
155) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
156) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
157) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
158) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
159) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
160) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States    
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 12, 2004, 07:21:03 pm
Quote:

Congrats Gambler on the 50K mark... Very cool!!!

And wow that list is blast from the past.  16K units... When I was at "full steam" that would take me about 6 weeks.

GE-Raven
   




I AM at full speed.  It would take roughly 54 weeks.  I have less steam than you.    
Title: Team Mexico
Post by: The Postman on April 14, 2004, 05:26:00 pm
From 4/3 to 4/11 Taldren averaged a daily output of 666.9 work units.
Team Mexico averaged 744.3 in the same time frame.

We need to find some more Work units from somewhere.  
Title: Re: Team Mexico
Post by: digi on April 15, 2004, 05:21:07 pm
Finally made the top 25 (hopefully I'll stay there).  My new work machine is adding beautifully to my output!

Results Received  3387
Total CPU Time  1.390 years  
Average CPU Time per work unit  3 hr 35 min 43.7 sec  
Average results received per day  8.59  
Your rank out of 4960424 total users is:  73802nd place.  
The number of users who have this rank:  29  
You have completed more work units than  98.512% of our users.

On a side note, I'll be upgrading my home 2.53Ghz to a 3Ghz this weekend.  Hopefully that'll add a few more units that we need to have to beat the Mexico Team.
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: nexa1 on April 16, 2004, 04:52:25 am
 Hey there...
 I got permission to use 3 computers for a little while. They are slow p3 550MHz. But every little bit helps. I have them set up just like the faq says so hopefully it will be a low maintenance deal. lol.
 I am curious to see how bad my times get.
 Anyone have a suggestion onn how to make the relics kick em out quicker?
 
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 16, 2004, 05:46:02 am
Every bit helps  
Title: WUs acquired from somewhere.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 16, 2004, 07:46:05 pm
Quote:

From 4/3 to 4/11 Taldren averaged a daily output of 666.9 work units.
Team Mexico averaged 744.3 in the same time frame.

We need to find some more Work units from somewhere.  




Description   Taldren,
Members   170
Results received   777684
Total CPU time   544.245 years  
 

Mexico Team
Members   124
Results received   599345
Total CPU time   652.616 years  
 

Anyone know who Putanginamo is?

2) Putanginamo    201013     98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines      

To answer my own question it is Cyberkada.
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 17, 2004, 11:25:03 pm
 104) Taldren   170   778859    544.873 years   6 hr 07 min 41.8 sec  

134) Mexico Team   124   600191   653.169 years   9 hr 31 min 59.6 sec  

So long as Cyber stays on the team we have the goal accomplished.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 18, 2004, 06:31:13 am
Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 18, 2004, 08:29:58 am
That is what we need is for them 2 to go at it. I don't even know how many WU a day they do.


 On a side note... if I did my math right, I should over take my old nexa1 (#63) spot before June. Does that sound right?
I am thinking that 2 of the P3 are crunching a unit every 9 hours and the 3rd id crunching one every 13 hours. My P4 2.6 does a unit every 3 hrs 40 min.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 18, 2004, 08:43:56 am
Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: DreadlordGW on April 18, 2004, 09:10:57 am
Quote:

Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  




Cyber moved on to BOINC
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 18, 2004, 02:00:58 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  




Oops
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: The Postman on April 18, 2004, 06:43:31 pm
BOINC is running? When are we supposed to switch over?  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 18, 2004, 09:19:31 pm
Quote:

BOINC is running? When are we supposed to switch over?  




Still in testing.  No date for the switch.  

 
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Erik Bethke on April 19, 2004, 12:02:19 pm
Wow that is totally awesome guys!!!!

We are in the top 100 in the world.  That is a truly amazing accomplishement.

Really could anyone here imagine it?  Top 100.

okay so for what are we doing in Korea.  This is to be considered confidential and not released to the public, just for you SETI guys...

I am leading a all Korean team plus one American - Nate Simpson from CA to create a new massively multiplayer game based on the kung-fu literature of China.  This is a huge body of fiction going back a thousand years and lead in the modern era by Louis Cha.

If you take a look at my website  www.erikbethke.com  you will find some book reviews there.  Take a look at the Deer and the Cauldron.

It is great working here in Korea, the atmosphere is differently paced, weather interesting and the people are cool.

The three areas of principle focus for our new game are:
Robust dynamic gameplay systems to reduce the reliance on static content
Very deep service
Advanced utilization of social network graphs for extremely neat tricks to have the server aware of the players' experience and adjust the gameplay on the fly to make it more of a partyl!

also as we said earlier B9 is on hold - more practically we and MJ have decided that we need some space.  I will leave it at that for now...

Awesome guys!
-Erik
   
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: GE-Raven on April 19, 2004, 03:02:57 pm
You are and continue to be... "The Best"  Erik.

Thanks for the bone.  

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Age on April 19, 2004, 06:13:44 pm
   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 19, 2004, 08:46:54 pm
Quote:

   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  




Link to team stats

Link to SETI @ Home home page  

Click the links for the information.  Then you don't have to believe anyone.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 20, 2004, 02:43:53 am

  I think of the SETI team as our own little group, in the Taldren family, working on a common goal together  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 20, 2004, 06:19:55 am
Its not a typical Korean MMORPG is it?
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 21, 2004, 08:55:58 am
 Well, I should take #78 in about 12 hours and #77 by this weekend.
79) nexa1   231 1041 hr 05 min 4 hr 30 min 24.8 sec Wed Apr 21 13:50:18 2004 United States

 Man my times sure went up with these P3 being added
Title: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: Dragon93 on April 29, 2004, 06:52:19 pm
I'm still alive. Still crunching WUs...

Just Crazy busy to the point that forum participation is among my absolute lowest priorities.

Anyway, just wanted to drop in and say Hi to let everyone know I haven't been lost in space or anything of the sort.

Good to see all the old familiar names, etc. I'll check in again in a few months...  
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 29, 2004, 07:19:54 pm
Quote:

I'm still alive. Still crunching WUs...

Just Crazy busy to the point that forum participation is among my absolute lowest priorities.

Anyway, just wanted to drop in and say Hi to let everyone know I haven't been lost in space or anything of the sort.

Good to see all the old familiar names, etc. I'll check in again in a few months...  




I have been watching you .  You seem to oscillate between 5000 and 5200 ahead of me.   I can't get closer than 5000 and you can't seem to pull ahead by more than 5200.  Unless you change things that will hold until sometime in May when I give away one of my computers and lose ~20% of my output .  Keep on pushing them out.    
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: Dragon93 on April 29, 2004, 07:24:21 pm
Quote:

I have been watching you .




Oh you have, have you?

I barely have time to even think about it much these days. My job wasn't keeping me busy enough so I started organizing a large music festival for next year and I am about to take on a few consulting gigs on the side.

Sleep is also a low priority for me...
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 01, 2004, 01:24:42 pm
Quote:

Sleep is also a low priority for me...  




Sounds very familiar.  

I have achieved 2 more goals.  Top 7500 and 99.85%.  Next goals top 5000 and 99.875%.  (Even .001% gains are hard for me now)

Your rank out of 4978530 total users is:    7490th place.

You have completed more work units than    99.850% of our users.  
Title: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 07, 2004, 10:21:02 am
Is anybody else having problems loading the team page or your individual page?  I am getting 500 errors on both and I have no idea if all of my machines are running.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: nexa1 on May 07, 2004, 02:17:06 pm

 Yeah for some reason for me it takes 3-4 times trying to load to actually get it. Don't know why tho.
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: AJTK on May 10, 2004, 06:41:13 pm
Although I will never get anywhere close to you boys with hardware like Dragon and Nemesis, I have added a P4-2.8 laptop to my inventory and it cranks out one wu about every 4-6 hours, not sure why there is such a large variation. Anyhow, I have FINALLY gotten myself away from the dirt eater on the list and am making progress at moving ahead of some of the mid level peeps who no longer are putting out new units.

Hoping to build a new P4-3.06/800mhz desktop in the near future, so that will also help my unit speed greatly if I can scrape the cash together. Wow, Taldren in the top 100 in the WORLD?!

Are we Trek geeks commited, or what? ROFL!

Oh yeah, Im still alive it would appear. Divorces suck.

Have a nice day!
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 10, 2004, 06:55:42 pm
Quote:

Although I will never get anywhere close to you boys with hardware like Dragon and Nemesis, I have added a P4-2.8 laptop to my inventory and it cranks out one wu about every 4-6 hours, not sure why there is such a large variation. Anyhow, I have FINALLY gotten myself away from the dirt eater on the list and am making progress at moving ahead of some of the mid level peeps who no longer are putting out new units.

Hoping to build a new P4-3.06/800mhz desktop in the near future, so that will also help my unit speed greatly if I can scrape the cash together. Wow, Taldren in the top 100 in the WORLD?!

Are we Trek geeks commited, or what? ROFL!

Oh yeah, Im still alive it would appear. Divorces suck.

Have a nice day!  




Are the P4s hyperthreading enabled?  (and is you OS as well?)  If so using the CLI you can run two copies at once and increase your total output (how much I can't say, but some people claim very substantial boosts).  In any case using the CLI compared to the screen saver is a minimum 10% boost, but you've probably heard that berfore (and are possibly using the CLI ).

I never anticipated getting in the top 10 when I joined.  Being in the upper half of Taldren was all I expected.  Doing 10,000 WUs seemed like a fantasy not reality.  But things happen and next thing  you know you are a contender.  All I can say is that  The Great Moo Hunt!  got out of control.  

 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: AJTK on May 10, 2004, 11:03:28 pm
using the CLI (at your instruction, lol) on the ol p3-750, using screen saver only on laptop at the moment. i need to dload the CLI and set it up again. I THINK this laptop is HT, but I am not positive. If I had to guess, I think it is, but Id have to look in the documentation to be sure. a 2.8, i think it has to be, doesnt it? 2.8 was next to last 533mhz, then the 3.0 went from 533 to 800 and they made others that were 800 that were slower. I am sure this is a 533 board tho. hmmm,  tried to find info on the motherboard/chipset in system, to no avail. OFW, its a 2.8, thats good enough for now, rofl. the cli runs faster on my 750, so it sure as hell will run faster on this thing, lol. Id appreciate if you would post the instrucitons on how to set up the cli again, and i will install it monyana.

Have a nice day!
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 11, 2004, 06:44:05 pm
Quote:

 Id appreciate if you would post the instrucitons on how to set up the cli again, and i will install it monyana.

Have a nice day!
   




There is a stickied thread with the instructions.  But here is a link to make it easier.  There is also a link in my signature.

Keep pumping them out.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: digi on May 12, 2004, 03:21:14 am
Quote:

Is anybody else having problems loading the team page or your individual page?  I am getting 500 errors on both and I have no idea if all of my machines are running.  




Same here.....The one I use which seems to keep completly uptodate with any new units posted is dead.  Anyone got an uptodate link that works?
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 12, 2004, 03:42:16 am
The links do seem to be having trouble.

They seem to have partially revised the links without posting much info about it.  This link is working better for me.  It is far from perfect but is better.  It also seems to be dependent somewhat on the time of day. Team page

Code:
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu



Note the addition of the 2 compared to older links that you may be using.    
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: digi on May 12, 2004, 04:08:17 am
It doesn't appear to be working for me right now, but I'll keep giving it a try.  Thanks Nem.
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 12, 2004, 05:10:28 am
No that link does not work. I also can't check my stats on the individual page either. The only page that I can get is the once a day team page.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: GE-Raven on May 12, 2004, 04:24:36 pm
You should soon notice an upswing in production.  I expect to be at about double in a day or so.  I hope to eclipse 1K WU per day at some point this summer.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 12, 2004, 04:59:53 pm
Quote:

You should soon notice an upswing in production.  I expect to be at about double in a day or so.  I hope to eclipse 1K WU per day at some point this summer.

GE-Raven
   




There goes my chance for catching you  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: ActiveX on May 13, 2004, 08:02:08 am
My WUs have dropped a lot since I've been playing Eve...

But I hope to add an 8 Opteron (dual core) powerhouse to my arsenal...
Title: Re: page loading problem:OUTAGE NOTICE:
Post by: The Postman on May 13, 2004, 01:47:58 pm
 
Quote:

 May 12, 2004
OUTAGE NOTICE: On Monday, May 17th we are going to have a two-hour web site outage starting at 17:00 UTC. Client downloads, statistical pages, etc. will be off-line during this time.
 


 
Title: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 16, 2004, 06:17:41 pm
Go to the following link scroll down to #48 in the USA and you will see our very own:

48) Raven     275878     163.049 years    5 hr 10 min 38.3 sec    Sun May 16 00:49:35 2004    United States
 
Way down at #639 but still among the top 1000 in the U.S.:

639) ICE Gambler     52150     44.339 years    7 hr 26 min 52.4 sec    Sat May 15 08:42:16 2004    United States

If you go to this link instead you will see him at #113 in the WORLD:

113) Raven     275480     162.829 years    5 hr 10 min 40.0 sec    Fri May 14 16:44:36 2004    United States

Much lower down but still in the top 200 is Putanginamao (aka Cyberkada/Carlosbott)

196) Putanginamo    201013     98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines

When I noticed these I could not resist giving you guys a little pat on the back (please ignore the kickme signs left behind ).  Way to go guys. You are the big boys that drag the team up into being among the best in the world.     None of the rest of us make the top 1000 in the world.  No one else makes the top 1000 in the U.S. (or would if they were American.)  
Title: Re: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: DreadlordGW on May 17, 2004, 12:07:49 am
If i still had use to our computer farms i'd be right up around Gambler - but cant run it as Seti slowed critical app down.
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Age on May 22, 2004, 03:56:16 am
Quote:

Quote:

   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  




Link to team stats

Link to SETI @ Home home page  

Click the links for the information.  Then you don't have to believe anyone.  


I guess I was wrong and sorry to everyone in the Seti team and for clearing this up for me Nemesis.It really is the search for ET.I have been more into Astonomy and looking at the stars.What is required to do a seti search?I thought it had something to do with the game.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 09:09:17 am
Quote:

I guess I was wrong and sorry to everyone in the Seti team and for clearing this up for me Nemesis.It really is the search for ET.I have been more into Astonomy and looking at the stars.What is required to do a seti search?I thought it had something to do with the game.  




Go to this thread it walks you through setting up the Seti command line client with the SETIDriver program to control uploads and downloads.  
Title: Re: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 09:34:04 am
Quote:

If i still had use to our computer farms i'd be right up around Gambler - but cant run it as Seti slowed critical app down.  




In our team's history you have a unique place.  

The statistics that you kept for so long encouraged people to work hard to keep up their averages.  Others made efforts to output more just to qualify for your stats list.  Your stats listing can probably be credited with causing 10's of thousands of WUS to be output for the team.  

Likely the output the you "provoked" with your statistics is greater than your own personal stats.   Your contribution is far greater than the measured stats.    
Title: A link from the birth of SETI @ Home
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 10:34:21 am
Link to story

Limited and edited quote below.
Quote:


The average Intel box takes an average of 35 hours to analyse each chunk of data, ...

the PowerPC which handles the Dalek data in a mere 23 hours, ...

SunSPARC which analyses the alien artefacts in just 16 Earth hours. ...

Alphas (from the dead planet Digitalia) take a mere ten galactic time units...

PA Risc systems have been sent more than 3000 batches of data, none of which have returned. ...

RS/6000s (lots of them in use in semi-detached houses in the Neasden area, no doubt) have been sent 4000 bundles of alien transmissions, but none have come back. ...

MIPS processors have gobbled up over 10,000 sets of data to no discernable effect...

680x0-based system has also failed to calculate anything....

an 'unknown' CPU which has received one load of data to which there has been no reply.


 
Title: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 24, 2004, 11:08:16 pm
Your rank out of 5006181 total users is:    7192nd place

and almost 5 million are behind me.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 29, 2004, 08:18:43 am
Brag, Brag, Brag!  

I may only have one lil 2.8 laptop now, but it pumps one out about every 4-6 hours, causing my avg wu per day to go up about 5% in a month, and has dropped my average time approx 20 minutes in that same month. I wonder if I should have my old 733 STOP doing wu's, as it actually hurts my averages? It takes anywhere from 11 (RARE) to 30 (not quite as rare) hours to turn one out, with the avg being around 19 or so. It is amazing how much faster a new pc will churn these things out. Ive done almost a hundred units in the last month. Of course, I saw where Raven said he was gonna top 1 THOUSAND a freaking DAY later this summer, but for this mere mortal, 100 a month is pretty good, lol!

BTW, Raven is at #46 on the home users list now! Congrats.

Have a nice day!    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 29, 2004, 11:08:32 am
Quote:

Brag, Brag, Brag!  

I may only have one lil 2.8 laptop now, but it pumps one out about every 4-6 hours, causing my avg wu per day to go up about 5% in a month, and has dropped my average time approx 20 minutes in that same month.




Unless that is a Celeron laptop or you are using the screensaver it should be faster than that.  I would expect under 3 hours for a P4 (non celeron).  A well configured screen saver should add no more than 20% to that number.  

If you are using the screensaver minimize the time displaying the graphics, they take about 90% of the processing time when running.

A 2.8 P4 COULD have hyperthreading, which while it would hurt your average time should improve your daily output.

Quote:

I wonder if I should have my old 733 STOP doing wu's, as it actually hurts my averages? It takes anywhere from 11 (RARE) to 30 (not quite as rare) hours to turn one out, with the avg being around 19 or so. It is amazing how much faster a new pc will churn these things out.




It depends, are you after good looking stats or are you trying to help the SETI @ Home project or our SETI team?  If you are after helping the project (and team) then the maximum output is of primary importance and you should keep the old machine running.

The old 733 is it a PIII?  It should be able to do better than that.  My mothers PII 350 mhz (which I will soon swap for my #4 machine, upgrading her to an Athlon XP 2400+ and hurting my average time and output) averages about 16 hours / WU when I can run it.  Your 733 should be able to do it in 8 hours, even a Celeron should manage 9-10 hours.

Less than 24 hours ago I replaced the Athlon XP 2100+ in my #3 machine with a Athlon XP 3200+, according to SETIQueue that machine has already improved its average (calculated over 14 days) by 4 minutes and seems to be dropping my historical average by about 4 seconds a day.  My early estimate is that it will be doing ~ 2 hrs 10 minutes / WU on average.  That should drive my output up to 45-46 WUs/day total.  My #2 machine drags my average time up, but I wouldn't think of stopping it (upgrade the dual Athlon XP 2100+ to Athlon MP 2800+ yes, stop it no ).  The PII will drag my average time up when I trade my mother but I will be running it until I give it away sometime this summer.  Then I will be down to 3 machines and maybe 38 WUs/ day output.

Quote:

Ive done almost a hundred units in the last month. Of course, I saw where Raven said he was gonna top 1 THOUSAND a freaking DAY later this summer, but for this mere mortal, 100 a month is pretty good, lol!




Every WU counts.  Whether you do 1 a month or a 1000 a day it counts and helps both SETI @ Home and the team.  

Quote:

BTW, Raven is at #46 on the home users list now! Congrats.

Have a nice day!    




Cheating Bostich , he should be on the business users list.  Most of his WUs come from business machines not his home machines.  

Almost all of mine were generated by my own machines ( a few came from my mothers machine, which I gave her, and a few from a friends home/small business machines).  But I don't (and won't) make the top 1000 home users list.

I am #286 in Canada

286) IKV Nemesis     19528     8.207 years    3 hr 40 min 54.2 sec    Sat May 29 00:40:55 2004    Canada

and # 6 in Ontario

6) IKV Nemesis     19532     8.209 years    3 hr 40 min 54.0 sec    Sat May 29 02:49:41 2004    Canada      

As far as our team is concerned, I used to be at #5.  The best I can reasonably hope to do (unless we lose a higher ranked member, which I don't want to happen) is to maintain myself at 6th place.  If another business user shows up (like everyone above me) I could easily be knocked down the list, even out of the top 10.  But anyone who wants my spot is going to have to work for it .  If they can take it good for them and the team.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 30, 2004, 07:46:51 am
Well, here is the deal. The 733 uses XP Pro, so I have the client running on it, BUT, I also have seti as the screensaver, as it appears that other screensavers have to fight with the seti client for cpu cycles. (The starfield looks like the Enterprise is running out of gas, it stutters) I have the screensaver only stay up for one minute then go blank... Not sure why the time is less than what you think it should be, this is actually a 750, not a 733, but it is a 750 on a 100mhz clock, not 133. Perhaps that is the reason?

The laptop is running XP HOME, so you said I cant run the client. Perhaps that is the reason for the time lag?

Your right of course, the overall seti output SHOULD be the goal, shouldnt it?

Have a nice day!  
 
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 30, 2004, 09:02:26 am
Quote:

Well, here is the deal. The 733 uses XP Pro, so I have the client running on it, BUT, I also have seti as the screensaver, as it appears that other screensavers have to fight with the seti client for cpu cycles. (The starfield looks like the Enterprise is running out of gas, it stutters) I have the screensaver only stay up for one minute then go blank... Not sure why the time is less than what you think it should be, this is actually a 750, not a 733, but it is a 750 on a 100mhz clock, not 133. Perhaps that is the reason?




A PIII at 750mhz and 100 FSB should (according to SETISpy) output a workunit in 7hrs 50 minutes.  How much memory do you have on it?  I don't use XP Pro but someone who does may be able to say if you are being memory limited.

As I understand this you are using both the CLI and the screensaver?  That would naturally drive up the time.  Instead of using a screensaver use the energy saving option to turn off the monitor after an inactive time.  

Running both will not only make them take twice as long BUT will introduce OS overhead that makes them take even longer, especially if you are low on memory.

Quote:

The laptop is running XP HOME, so you said I cant run the client. Perhaps that is the reason for the time lag?




As far as I know the CLI should run on XP Home.  I have never tried it myself (I don't have XP Home or Pro).  If I said anything that led you to believe otherwise it was an error.

Quote:

Your right of course, the overall seti output SHOULD be the goal, shouldnt it?

Have a nice day!    




It is for me.  For those who want to keep their stats fast they can always create a new account to donate the output of slow running computers.  That way they get what they want while maintaining maximum output for SETI.  Everyone wins, no one loses.

The race for rank is merely a fun add on.  The competition between moofighters and myself way back when he passed me the first time entertained both of us and others who read the postings between us.  The Great Moo Hunt later did the same.  Unfortunately that ended a year ago when the moohunt ended .    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 30, 2004, 05:01:40 pm
Maybe that is my problem, using the client and screensaver. I will try it without. But that really does not account for the fact that even with running both, the screensaver version still sometimes gets one out as fast as 11 hours. Usually alot longer tho. Ill turn screeny off, see what gives. The 750 has 576 megs of ram, with almost nothing running other than all the XP Pro processes that say that blue bolts from the heavens will strike you head if you dare to turn them off.

Thanks for the info Nemesis. Ill keep plugging away. Im not really worried about stats, I obviously cant get very high up the list, lol. I just wanna be respectable! ALOT of the people in front of me are deadwood, and havent put out units in months/years so it's just a matter of time until I get up to some of you big boys near the top and p00p out.

Have a nice day!  
 
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 03, 2004, 06:08:30 pm
Quote:

I just wanna be respectable!




I call this respectable.

47) AJTK     1008     1.337 years    11 hr 37 min 22.8 sec    Thu Jun 3 20:26:15 2004    United States

Relatively few reach 4 figures OR a year of computer time.  Well done on both counts.

Quote:

I obviously cant get very high up the list, lol.




Sound like me back in the beginning.  I was told that as a home user the best I could hope for was the top 20 on the team, top 10 was impossible.  I don't understand that word impossible.  

Keep trying and just perhaps you will find the time comes that you are the big guy.  Improbable, perhaps.  Not impossible.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on June 03, 2004, 08:53:03 pm
lol, i dont think i will be cranking out 1K wu's per DAY anytime soon, rofl! but, im hoping to build a new desktop sometime this year. either with a top o the line hyperlthreading enabled p4 or perhaps an athalon fx64

yeah, over 1000! FINALLY! and my time is still going down down down

HAND!  
 
Title: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 06, 2004, 10:24:43 pm
5) Dragon93     25000     33.455 years    11 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Mon Jun 7 02:58:25 2004    United States  

Now lets see you get the 50,000 certificate.

 
Title: Re: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
Post by: Dragon93 on June 09, 2004, 07:05:35 pm
That's gonna be a while there buddy.

Unless I can commandeer some more machines...
Title: server troubles
Post by: The Postman on June 17, 2004, 11:03:24 am
Does anybody know what is going on with the data server? Is this a bandwidth problem on their end? They seem hard pressed to get it to run 48 hours without problems.  I can't keep my "service" machines running if they can't keep the server up. As it is I haven't been able to transmit for 2 days on my home machines.  
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 19, 2004, 09:32:25 am
June 17, 2004
We are working on fixing the network problems that are resulting in dropped connections to the data server.

June 18, 2004
The campus network folks did some great troubleshooting and narrowed down the problem to a faulty link on the path to our ISP. Repairs have been called in.

I've had trouble sending in but since I use SETIQueue I haven't missed a WU.    
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: The Postman on June 19, 2004, 03:41:13 pm
I have been following their troubles since they began posting. My problem is that I have 3 machines that I can't run any caching on. Everytime the server crashes on their end and one of these 3 machines tries to transmit and can't, it stops running until I can reboot it. I lose more than half of my capacity when those machines don't run.  In the meantime I have enlarged my cache by 1 day for the rest of my machines.  
Title: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Taldren_Admin on October 14, 2003, 12:24:59 pm
And we're off....
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 14, 2003, 12:31:39 pm
Quote:

And we're off....  




And that is news to whom?  

 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 14, 2003, 12:33:47 pm
Drat, if not for Farenheit, I would have had the last post in the second thread.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on October 14, 2003, 01:14:58 pm
Ok everyone post away.

Gotta get this thread above the old ones
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on October 14, 2003, 01:22:49 pm
Heh. It seems that we can only get so many posts before this version of the UBB stops the thread from working well.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 14, 2003, 01:59:59 pm
One of the last posts I made in Seti Thread II was a response from David Anderson - the power that be behind BOINC - to a note I sent him.

My original message was as follows:

Quote:

The ability of programs like SetiQueue to be a single point of contact for many Seti clients is important to maximum work unit production.  Many of the machines currently processing Seti work units do not have an internet connection, but connect to a single machine that does.

Remove the ability of SetiQueue to act as that single point of contact, and you also remove all of those non-internet connected machines from the pool.




His response:

 I think that an HTTP proxy would serve the same purpose.
I added some text to the "transition" page to this effect.
-- David  


The transition page of which he speaks is here:

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/boinc_transition_plan.html

and his address (should anyone have an issue with his response) is:

davea@ssl.berkeley.edu
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 14, 2003, 02:46:32 pm
Having said that non-Internet connected machines will not have access, I'm through after SETI I.  Most of my machines are behind a fairly ugly milnet firewall and have no access individually.  SETI is one of those banned Internet programs.  SETI can run but can not receive/ send W/Us.

Oh well, I guess I will have to be Lord God for Life for SETI I for Taldren.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 14, 2003, 03:04:17 pm
Like I said - if you have an issue with it, send Mr. Anderson a note explaining what the issue is and why.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: digi on October 14, 2003, 06:01:06 pm
Although I only use 3 machines, 2 of these will be affected by Seti 2.  I've emailed Mr. Anderson about the issue as you suggested.  Hopefully if he gets enough of these some action may be taken to solve this issue.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 14, 2003, 06:37:17 pm
Programs like SetiQueue and SetiDriver were created to handle problems with non internet connected machines by individuals.  I would be very surprised if the same did not occur with BOINC.  So give it time.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on October 14, 2003, 06:42:50 pm
This post brought to you buy the letter A

As in We need a BOINC Setiqueue
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 14, 2003, 07:10:00 pm
Since it looks like the old threads are going to be "unstickied" I think it may be useful to post a link to them.  Here they are.

Link to Seti thread I
Link to Seti thread II  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Mentat Jon on October 14, 2003, 07:25:05 pm
89) Mentat Jon   120 2530 hr 27 min 21 hr 05 min 13.5 sec Sat Sep 27 13:31:58 2003 United States



the slow creep to the summit continues!!!!  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on October 14, 2003, 08:33:30 pm
Well, due to two factors, I'm going to stop running seti, at least until we get another group going on another project. Lately, I've been having trouble paying bills so I'm turning off everything non-essential to try to drive down my electric bill. The other is just that this part is ending and it looks like there will be a lull between this one and the next so this is a good time to quit.

I just can't believe how fear this relatively small group has gone. We went from nothing to one of the top 200 groups in the world in just a short time. Does anyone know how long this group has be in existence and how long the SETI project has been going?  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Dogmatix! on October 15, 2003, 10:00:46 am
Well, I've been in it since like May of 1999...sadly, most of my time as a member has been on a slow machine.  Most of my total WUs have some since I set up on new rig in February...lol.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 15, 2003, 10:19:37 am
I joined the group in October 1, 2001, I believe when Erik first posted about it or shortly after.  It may have been a semi-private group before that.

It is certainly amazing when you consider that of our little group, I am number 1,948 in the world, Raven is 167 and Cyberkada is #143.

Go us!
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Dogmatix! on October 15, 2003, 10:22:00 am
Yeah...I joined our group shortly after it was set up, too.  In fact, i'm pretty sure I was one of the first five or so people.  When I joined, I was ranked #2 in our group with somewhwere around 1500 WUs...lol...



 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on October 15, 2003, 10:24:02 am
So who gave us less than 5 stars!

I say we hunt them down and give them the biggest wedgie they've ever felt.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on October 15, 2003, 04:29:35 pm
Seems someone has decided it is their mission to go around giving any thread started by an Admin or Mod 1 star. Just shows that jellyfish can use a keyboard and the internet too...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 16, 2003, 04:19:52 am
I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 16, 2003, 08:32:15 am
Quote:

I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.




Void's ban was temporary, and regardless of my personal opinion of Atra, he hasn't done anything under the rules to get banned for.  IMO, that means the rules need to be tweaked a bit.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 16, 2003, 08:43:21 am
He has a right to his opinon... just show him how it is not a good one.  

We don't want him gone.  

We need to show his arguement as the fool's arguement it is.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cyberkada on October 16, 2003, 03:44:08 pm
My point is that Atrahasis pretty much can say anything in these forums with impunity.  Any one else is banned for the exact same thing.  I see the double standard and its appalling.  I guess if we all support radical Islamist terrorism, we can say pretty much anything in these forums.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Taldren_Admin on October 17, 2003, 09:58:18 pm
Quote:

My point is that Atrahasis pretty much can say anything in these forums with impunity.  Any one else is banned for the exact same thing.  I see the double standard and its appalling.  I guess if we all support radical Islamist terrorism, we can say pretty much anything in these forums.
 




Off topic but I will reply to that...

The answer is:

Damned if I do damned if I don't.  He has no impunity. He hasn't crossed the line far enough.

By the way, just in case you were thinking about it.... Please don't post a list of his transgressions. Send me a PM with the links if you really believe that in the way he stated his opinions he has crossed the line.

Now back to our regularly scheduled show.....
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on October 17, 2003, 10:33:18 pm
Quote:

I'm outta here until Atrahasis - the Islamic terrorist supporter is banned and VoidWar is reinstated.  I'm tired of this terrorist supporter continually getting the "bye" while others are banned.
   




Cyber,

Is this your 523rd or 524th "Im outta here cause(fill in Blank) ?

   
Title: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 18, 2003, 01:44:49 pm
11) Sethan     7500  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: jualdeaux on October 18, 2003, 03:09:54 pm
Good job Nem
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 18, 2003, 08:48:45 pm
Heh - I'm looking to make it into the Taldren top 10 some time this week.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: SPQR Renegade001 on October 19, 2003, 04:52:35 pm
Quote:

11) Sethan     7500  




7500 WU and 8198 posts. Hmmm.... I think I know how to get a few more WUs out of Sethan's machine  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 19, 2003, 09:15:39 pm
Quote:

Quote:

11) Sethan     7500  




7500 WU and 8198 posts. Hmmm.... I think I know how to get a few more WUs out of Sethan's machine  




Chuckle.  Most of those WU are from the last 6 months.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 20, 2003, 11:18:20 am
Well A few notes...  Lost several thousand units due to a slip up with the Queue.

Oh well...

Broke the 100 Year barrier for processing time for Seti WUs!!!

I too think I am going to try to get my Post total more inline with my WU total...

Wonder how long it would take to post 160,000 messages...

Maybe if I hire Sirgod and Sethan fulltime.

GE-Raven


 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 20, 2003, 11:19:50 am

Does anybody know if Brian Kinney changed his Seti nickname to KD4?

Brian disappeared from the group, and KD4 showed up at the same time, with about the right number of WUs.


"Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must first be overcome." -- Samuel Johnson  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 11:25:15 am
Quote:

Wonder how long it would take to post 160,000 messages...

Maybe if I hire Sirgod and Sethan fulltime.  




I'm available...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on October 20, 2003, 11:38:46 am
Well If I did hire ya I doubt anyone would notice that you were posting for me (except for an increase in volume of those posts).  We have oft been "on the same side of the coin".  Maybe that is why Atra dislikes us so...    

Now as for SIrgod... I would have to clean up that "Okey accent" a bit...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 11:45:58 am
Quote:

Well If I did hire ya I doubt anyone would notice that you were posting for me (except for an increase in volume of those posts).  We have oft been "on the same side of the coin".  Maybe that is why Atra dislikes us so...      




*Gasp*  Do you really think Atra doesn't like us?  I'm so hurt.

I was going more for something like 'deeply detests'.

Ah well.  I'll have to try harder.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: KD4 on October 20, 2003, 02:35:16 pm
Quote:


Does anybody know if Brian Kinney changed his Seti nickname to KD4?

Brian disappeared from the group, and KD4 showed up at the same time, with about the right number of WUs.


"Nothing will ever be attempted, if all possible objections must first be overcome." -- Samuel Johnson  




yes i did change my name.. it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 20, 2003, 02:50:08 pm
Quote:


yes i did change my name..




OK, thanks.  And noted as suck.


Quote:

it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  




Sethan will pass Noah Wallace in about 6 days, and Zeppa 2 days after that.  To make it happen in that order, Zeppa will pass Noah in a couple of days.

Down in the 20's, The Postman is cranking out a respectable 18-19 WU per day.  He'll make the top 20 in a couple of months.


"If all it takes for you to give up your freedom are some pretty words or alarming rhetoric, then you are simply not going to remain free" -- Thomas Sowell
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on October 20, 2003, 04:06:07 pm
Quote:

it looks like Sethan will take me out of the top ten towmorrow .. wish i could get more than 2 machines working on this  




That long do you think?    I have to admit, I cheat.  I have about 20 low end machines working, and some better ones.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 20, 2003, 06:25:42 pm
Quote:


Down in the 20's, The Postman is cranking out a respectable 18-19 WU per day.  He'll make the top 20 in a couple of months.
 




If seti runs that long  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Mazeppa on October 22, 2003, 06:22:10 am
Quote:

Heh - I'm looking to make it into the Taldren top 10 some time this week.  




10) Sethan  7803  5.132 years 5 hr 45 min 42.4 sec Wed Oct 22 02:08:04 2003 United States

...and you have!  Congratulations!  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 23, 2003, 07:23:23 am
The servers seem to be down this AM and a useless bump to the top of the list.  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 24, 2003, 08:53:19 am
Hey guys, I'm thinking of joining your group!

I've only got 1 PC and I can't run it 24/7 but it is a 2800 XP (barton core) running at 333Mhz with 1GB of RAM and I can crank out a WU in 3 hours, (command line version). What's the fastest you guys have done a WU on your PC, (or fastest PC if you have a network)?

Give me a while to set-it up, (I don't have any WU's to carry over though so I will have to start from 0).
 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Fahrenheit on October 24, 2003, 09:56:07 am
Hey, welcome to the group!


Work Units can vary quite a bit in the length it takes to process them.  I've seen WUs take less than 2 hours, and then WUs take more than 5 hours, on the same machine, with the same load.


It's just the way it is.


"Use wisely your power of choice." -- Og Mandino
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 24, 2003, 10:24:57 am
Ah ok. Well, I've signed up to Taldren now so I guess I'll keep an eye on my average WU time.

Impressive group stats I might add. You guys have processed more WU's than the whole of Egypt put together! W00t!!!

   
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on October 24, 2003, 11:36:33 pm
Poster: Lurker
Quote:

Hey guys, I'm thinking of joining your group!

I've only got 1 PC and I can't run it 24/7 but it is a 2800 XP (barton core) running at 333Mhz with 1GB of RAM and I can crank out a WU in 3 hours, (command line version). What's the fastest you guys have done a WU on your PC, (or fastest PC if you have a network)?

Give me a while to set-it up, (I don't have any WU's to carry over though so I will have to start from 0).
   




My Athlon 2400XP (thoroughbred core) with 266mhz and 512 MB ram does 1 WU in 2:50 - 2:55 so you should be able to get a little more from that baby.  My other 2 machines process slower, but since they are both dual processor they output more WU's / day by processing two at a time.  Barring crashes my 3 machines put out a total of ~35 WUs/day.  

I just noticed we have passed 600,000  work units.   WOOO!! WOO!!!    

AND!

I passed 5 computer years!

Total CPU Time     5.004 years
SETI@home user for:    1.762 years
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 25, 2003, 04:21:55 pm
Hmmm...2 hours 41 mins for my first WU. I think I'm pleased with that.  

It would be nice to see how that compares with Pentium 4's, with or without Hyperthreading.  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Stormbringer on October 25, 2003, 04:41:03 pm
Maximum PC did benchmarks on th first A64 machines this month 2.2 ghz A64- 55fx; 105 minutes, 3.2 ghz P4c 133 minutes, 2.2 ghz Athlon XP; 136.7 minutes. Don't know about the family scalability speedwise but it is likely the second and third gen chips will be much faster. I'm waiting for them to support nonparity memory (in the works) or for parity memory to become more available and hence less expensive. But I will get one eventually.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Lurker on October 26, 2003, 05:59:51 pm
WU's done = 6

Average time = 2 hr 16 min 33.9 sec

W00T!!!11 Go AMD!    
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Jim on October 28, 2003, 12:43:04 pm
Hey!  

I have been getting an "Unknown ERROR 100" for the last 2 days... anyone have a clue as to what that is???  

Jim
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Gambler on October 28, 2003, 12:47:31 pm
Quote:

Hey!  

I have been getting an "Unknown ERROR 100" for the last 2 days... anyone have a clue as to what that is???  

Jim  




That's a new one to me.  Where have you been getting the error message?
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Jim on October 28, 2003, 12:51:37 pm
Seti starts to run... it tries to connect... it says I have done 0 units so far... and after about 3 seconds the program aborts.  I haven't a clue as to why, but SETI quit running 2 days ago on my computer and I can't get it started again.

Hrm... I just uninstalled SETI v3.07 and installed SETI v3.08... same problem.  The first thing the program tries to do is send a unit I have done to the SETI computer... maybe my work unit was messed up?  Is there anyway to clear that out (just delete the work unit so it won't try to send it the results?)?  Other than that, I have no idea why it won't run...

UPDATE:  While experimenting, I move the 3 files result.sah, temp.sah, and wtemp.sah to a temporary storage area, and the SETI program started.  It immediately downloaded another unit and started working on it.  The user data on the screen for me is now blank... total units listed as 0... but it is running... strange...  Anyone know what those 3 files do?

Thanks in advance

Jim
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: The Postman on October 28, 2003, 08:12:22 pm
Is anybody else having trouble with connections? 2 of my p4s are stopped right now because they can't connect.  
Title: can't Connect? Here is the answer
Post by: The Postman on October 28, 2003, 08:41:26 pm
? October 27, 2003 ?
 
Quote:

 ? October 27, 2003 ?
If you are unable to connect due to "100" errors (or perhaps "41") you may need to exit SETI@home, remove the files "result.sah" and "user_info.sah" from your system, and then restart SETI@home. This is probably fallout from the user database crash a few days ago. Sorry for the inconvenience.
 



 
Title: Golden Work Unit Achieved!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 01, 2003, 09:35:13 pm
The Golden Work Unit is what they call it on the SETI message boards when your rank and your results recieved are the same.  

Results Received    11414
Your rank out of 4735612 total users is:    11414th place.

Like mine now is (briefly).  
Title: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: The Postman on November 06, 2003, 08:56:37 am
These forums will be Read only in a week. We need to get this moved or start a new one. If we start a new one, lets get all the important links and instructions in the first post as well as what we are doing so that any new recruits won't have to search the thread.  Maybe somebody could put up what the first post could look like and we could comment on it here.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Gambler on November 06, 2003, 09:22:00 am
Quote:

These forums will be Read only in a week. We need to get this moved or start a new one. If we start a new one, lets get all the important links and instructions in the first post as well as what we are doing so that any new recruits won't have to search the thread.  Maybe somebody could put up what the first post could look like and we could comment on it here.




Did anybody else get a little dizzy when the thread moved?
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: digi on November 12, 2003, 05:45:20 pm
Whoooo!       1904 Units.  2000 Units here I come.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Commander Xizor on November 15, 2003, 04:01:51 pm
What happened to our totals?  It seems to have gone down dramatically the last couple of days.  I know we lost Cyber a while  ago, but did we lose someone else?

At least my 2500 WU's aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 15, 2003, 04:35:54 pm
Quote:

What happened to our totals?  It seems to have gone down dramatically the last couple of days.  I know we lost Cyber a while  ago, but did we lose someone else?

At least my 2500 WU's aren't going anywhere anytime soon.  




Raven left as well.  

My WUs stay as well.    
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: KD4 on November 15, 2003, 08:30:23 pm
why did they leave?
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 15, 2003, 08:40:19 pm
Quote:

why did they leave?  




Neither one said anything they were just gone.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on November 16, 2003, 08:13:48 pm
I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.

I don't know which order I will achieve them but suspect that passing Max will be last (around Christmas sometime if SETI lasts that long).  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: GE-Raven on November 17, 2003, 09:27:37 am
Quote:

Quote:

why did they leave?  




Neither one said anything they were just gone.    




http://forums.taldren.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=214414&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

This is all I can say.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Fahrenheit on November 17, 2003, 03:46:36 pm
Quote:

I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.

I don't know which order I will achieve them but suspect that passing Max will be last (around Christmas sometime if SETI lasts that long).  





My three goals are:


1) Make 5000th WU. Est: 11 December, 2003

2) Make Taldren's Top 15.  Est: 21 December, 2003

3) Make 1st place in my Registration Class: Estimated Date 14 February 2004


I don't know if I'll make them or not.

 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: GE-Raven on November 18, 2003, 04:45:14 pm
Ok... I am back...

Erik, ya got until Christmas for new goals.

Tick - Tock


GE-Raven

 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Toasty0 on November 18, 2003, 08:23:54 pm
Quote:

Ok... I am back...

Erik, ya got until Christmas for new goals.

Tick - Tock


GE-Raven

   




Christmas? Man, Sean, you're too charitable.

Hey, bro, you done (read my lazy slang as: COMPOSED) any new music you might like to share?

Glad you stayed.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: GE-Raven on November 19, 2003, 08:50:44 am
Nothing new yet, do have a few ideas brewing though...

Glad you stayed too ToastyO... didn't mean to be too hard on ya in the other thread, but I want to make sure I don't appear "biased".

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Sethan on November 19, 2003, 12:06:45 pm
Well, I've gone about as high as I'm going to.  I have been asked to remove the SETI client from the machines here at work.
Title: Re: Sethan makes a landmark on his sneak attack on the top 10. Congratulations.
Post by: Toasty0 on November 20, 2003, 01:17:56 am
Quote:

Well, I've gone about as high as I'm going to.  I have been asked to remove the SETI client from the machines here at work.  




That's a shame. I hope producing those WUs hasn't caused you any trouble.

Thanks for all the units you did bring in though. They and your participation have moved the project and Taldren SETI forward and is mucho appreciated.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Seti server down
Post by: The Postman on December 03, 2003, 09:27:40 am
FYI
The server has been down this morning for at least the last 4 hours.  
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: jualdeaux on December 04, 2003, 02:15:04 pm
HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Sethan on December 04, 2003, 03:07:35 pm
Quote:

HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????  




no.
Title: Congrats to Gambler!
Post by: GE-Raven on December 08, 2003, 11:08:06 am
Gambler Breaks 40K

Congrats man...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Congrats to Gambler!
Post by: Gambler on December 08, 2003, 03:04:58 pm
Quote:

Gambler Breaks 40K

Congrats man...

GE-Raven
   




Thank you.  I hadn't paid that much attention to it.    I've been slacking off just a bit.  I did add a new machine to my stable.  Well, I replaced one.  I pulled my P4 750 and replaced it with a P4 2.8.  Merry Christmas to me.
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Dogmatix! on December 08, 2003, 03:14:18 pm
Quote:

HELLOOO!!!!!!! ANYONE IN HERE?????????????  





heh...still here, but I've been close to pulling the plug on my 4 1/2 year affiliation with the SETI@home project.  I guess I'm getting a little bored with the whole thing and it's becoming more of a nuisance than anything else.

Additionally, i'm kind of sick of seeing our team's place in the rankings affected so greatly by the whims of members choosing to leave for this reason and that...





 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: Reffet on December 10, 2003, 12:47:44 am
Wow, I must have mised a lot! been down for several months (due to job situation) and just now got back online. Just lost a machine due to burned out Microprocessor but stll have my main gun going, Dang - it! Ill never catch you now Pirate.  
Title: Question about command line client and hyper-threading.
Post by: GE-Raven on December 15, 2003, 10:48:00 am
Just noticed that on the new "hyper-threaded" machines that the client only runs at 50%.  Anybody know how to get it back to 99%?

Thanks...

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: Question about command line client and hyper-threading.
Post by: ChAotiCIllusion on December 15, 2003, 01:33:50 pm
Quote:

Just noticed that on the new "hyper-threaded" machines that the client only runs at 50%.  Anybody know how to get it back to 99%?

Thanks...

GE-Raven
   




You have to run 2 instances of seti seti driver can do this I don't know how to do it any other way. My HT machine can poor out 2 units every 3 hours
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Xizor on December 17, 2003, 09:58:09 pm
From the post in Hot and Spicy by Erik:

Quote:

Okay here is the new goal: Beat Mexico!




Taldren WU: 439300
Mexico WU: 2550330

Tall order indeed.  I'd say some big-crunch recruiting may be in order.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 17, 2003, 10:19:30 pm
Quote:

From the post in Hot and Spicy by Erik:

Quote:

Okay here is the new goal: Beat Mexico!




Taldren WU: 439300
Mexico WU: 2550330

Tall order indeed.  I'd say some big-crunch recruiting may be in order.  




I don't know offhand where you got your numbers but here are mine from the top 200 team list:
Code:

141) Mexico Team    112   504283      580.600 years     10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren        164   439498      354.856 years      7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec

       
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 18, 2003, 08:23:20 am
The difference is probably between the NATION of mexico, and Team Mexico
Title: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 18, 2003, 08:24:37 am
12/17/03
 
Quote:

 141) Mexico Team    112   504283      580.600 years     10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren        164   439498      354.856 years      7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec





Today
 
Quote:

 133) Mexico Team 112 504523 580.775 years 10 hr 05 min 02.2 sec
 155) Taldren 164 439708 354.995 years 7 hr 04 min 20.3 sec


 

Mexico gained 240
Taldren gained 210

for a net gain of -30

I can cut 10  - 15 off the loss once the severs are up and running again and I can get the machines at work running again.
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 18, 2003, 08:49:37 am
You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 18, 2003, 11:13:25 am
There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: RogueJedi_XC on December 18, 2003, 11:17:27 am
Quote:

You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
   




!!!
Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...

 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 18, 2003, 11:46:15 am
 
Quote:

Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...
 




There are 2 P4's and a P3 that need to be running 24/7 in the dispatch. Most of the time they are logged off doing nothing. So I just use the spare clock cycles to run seti with the chiefs OK. Only problem is that because of the network setup these machines are on, I can't use setiQueue to cache and so when the Seti servers go down I need to restart each unit.
   
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 18, 2003, 01:12:20 pm
Quote:

Quote:

You should see a jump in my production soon.

I will admit I have been a little "ho-hum" about it lately.  I should be able to push 900-1000 WU a day soon.

GE-Raven
   




!!!
Your company lets you run SETI on it's machines?

That puts my paltry 6 to 7 units per day to shame...

   




I am the Network Admin... I let me run SETI on our machines  

I have actually found it beneficial on machines that run 3d modelling aps such as 3dsmax.  The Win2k Idle thread is bugged and has a memory leak when programs spen a lot of time at 99% processor utilization.  The Seti command line, works much better.  As long as Memory isn't a problem I find Seti to allow the machine to stay "up" much longer without ill-effects.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Xizor on December 18, 2003, 09:36:54 pm
Quote:

The difference is probably between the NATION of mexico, and Team Mexico  




That would be it.  I suppose Team Mexico makes a little more sense.
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 18, 2003, 10:10:25 pm
Quote:

There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page  




Just a little bump.  Welcome back.  Now I have to EARN my way into the top 5.   Sooon.  By New Years perhaps.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 19, 2003, 09:44:07 am
12/17/03
 
Quote:

 141) Mexico Team 112 504283 580.600 years 10 hr 05 min 08.5 sec
164) Taldren 164 439498 354.856 years 7 hr 04 min 22.5 sec
 




12/19/03

 Mexico Team - 505310
 Taldren         - 472414

 Mexico Team gained - 1027
 Taldren          gained - 1924 + 30992 from Phillip Showel      
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: GE-Raven on December 19, 2003, 09:52:55 am
Quote:

There will be a smallish one time bump as soon as seti decided to let me see the join group page  




Smallish...

 


GOod to see ya back dread.  Time to kick tail...

BTW I will soon be posing about a milestone for me.
 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: DreadlordGW on December 19, 2003, 08:00:18 pm
I say smallish because besides the units i have, i barely get any now.

Most of my old standby machines got nuked, and i;ve been told not to put Seti on them unless i use the machine a ton (ie my work machine)
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 20, 2003, 09:09:09 pm
Quote:

I only have 3 SETI objectives left:

1/ Pass Max - his lead is now less than 1000
  4) Max Peck     12933
  5) IKV Nemesis 11934

2/ Reach 10,000 th rank, 909 to go.
 Your rank out of 4755616 total users is:    10909th place.

3/ Reach 99.800% 0.029% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.771% of our users.




Goal 1/ Max is still holding on by 281 work units

5) Max Peck     13404
6) IKV Nemesis  13123

Goal 2/ accomplished!  I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4799782 total users is:    9999th place.

Gaining on goal 3/ only .008% to go

You have completed more work units than    99.792% of our users.      
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on December 21, 2003, 10:55:11 am
 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




12/21/03
Mexico Team - 506718
Taldren - 473158

Team Mexico produced 1408
Taldren produced 744

For a net loss of 664 WU  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 23, 2003, 10:53:22 am
Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.

In other news.  

Raven roars past 200,000 Work Units.

1) Raven     200636    

 
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 24, 2003, 06:59:27 am
Quote:

Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.
   




I just recalculated using those links and we are now behind 33194, a gain of 352 in roughly 20 hours.

My #3 computer has an odd work unit processing now.  It has taken 8.5 hours so far and SETISpy is forcasting a total time of 15.5 hours.  That machine usually does a WU in 2.85 hours.  Must have some interesting data.  (AR=1.103, which might normally push the time up a little but nothing like this.  Note, forcast total time for completion has started to drop).

Data below is from SETISpy.
Code:

Spike           Power   Score   Signal ratio   Resolution   Frequency   Time   Drift rate
Best score   198.89    0.697    24.861            0.075             1419265230.60    87.24    -2.7950
Returned 1   196.37    0.691    24.547          0.075             1419259000.72    87.26    0.0037
Returned 2   193.39    0.684    24.174            0.075             1419258999.75    87.26    0.0092
Returned 3   193.57    0.685    24.196            0.075             1419260413.94    33.70    3.8708
Returned 4   186.32    0.668    23.289            0.075             1419265884.75    101.09    -1.4566
Returned 5   194.34    0.687    24.293            0.075             1419265885.13    101.09    -1.4585
Returned 6   192.57    0.683    24.072            0.075             1419265885.50    101.09    -1.4603
Returned 7   181.71    0.657    22.713            0.075             1419265885.87    101.09    -1.4622
Returned 8   198.89    0.697    24.861            0.075             1419265230.59    87.26    -2.7950
Returned 9   189.14    0.675    23.643            0.075             1419265231.56    87.26    -2.8005


       
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on December 28, 2003, 09:57:37 am
Quote:

Links to current team stats

Taldren  Results received    474737

Mexico Team  Results received    508283

Mexico's lead = 33546

Some of the other sources are not up to date at any given time.  These should be within a few minutes of current.

In other news.  

Raven roars past 200,000 Work Units.

1) Raven     200636    

   




Mexico Results received    511516

Taldren  Results received 479594

Mexico's lead = 31922  Gain = 1624 or about 325/day at that rate roughly 98 days until we match them.

I believe Raven put himself back into high gear.  

 
Title: Re: Need new Thread or move this one?
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 04, 2004, 08:41:44 am
Mexico Team Results received  516136

Taldren Results received 486645    

Difference = 29491

Since December 23rd a gain of 4055 WUs

Quote:

Goal 1/ Max is still holding on by 281 work units

5) Max Peck 13404
6) IKV Nemesis 13123

Goal 2/ accomplished! I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4799782 total users is: 9999th place.

Gaining on goal 3/ only .008% to go  




Personal goals achieved.

Goal 1/ accomplished!

5) IKV Nemesis 13633
6) Max Peck 13630

That is as high as I go.  There is no way I can catch Dragons business network and everyone else has too much of a lead to catch before SETI 1 ends even if they stopped processing now.  (No I don't know the date SETI 1 ends but it would take 18 months just to reach Dreadlords current stats at my rate of processing WUs)

Goal 2/ accomplished! on December 20 I am in the top 10,000!

Your rank out of 4818492 total users is:    9651st place.  Top 9000 here I come.

Gaining on goal 3/ accomplished!  

You have completed more work units than    99.800% of our users.  

Next goal 99.85%.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on January 17, 2004, 08:32:01 am
 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  
Title: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 19, 2004, 06:33:26 pm
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis

Results Received    14172
Total CPU Time    6.177 years

Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 49 min 04.6 sec
Average results received per day    19.42

Last result returned:   Tue Jan 20 00:16:44 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   2.000 years

Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 4844072 total users is:    9334th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.807% of our users.  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 20, 2004, 08:41:18 am
Happy Aniversary.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dogmatix! on January 20, 2004, 04:05:46 pm
I've been on the team since it was started and I've actually been crunching SETI WUs since May of 1999 but as of this past weekend, I'd decided to pretty much stop participating in the project.   In fact, they pretty much ceased about two weeks ago due to my wife always closing the SETI Driver program rather than just minimizing it when she was using the computer.  During that time, I got passed up by one or two guys on our team that I was outproducing.  Aside from a general boredom with the program itself, I've grown tired of fighting the Spousal Unit's general disregard for my wish to crunch SETI WUs as quickly as possible.


I'll likely just leave my meager total of completed WUs with the Taldren team but my slow and steady trickle of 10-15 WUs per day will cease.


It's been fun...heheh.


 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 20, 2004, 06:12:23 pm
Quote:

I've been on the team since it was started and I've actually been crunching SETI WUs since May of 1999 but as of this past weekend, I'd decided to pretty much stop participating in the project.   In fact, they pretty much ceased about two weeks ago due to my wife always closing the SETI Driver program rather than just minimizing it when she was using the computer.  During that time, I got passed up by one or two guys on our team that I was outproducing.  Aside from a general boredom with the program itself, I've grown tired of fighting the Spousal Unit's general disregard for my wish to crunch SETI WUs as quickly as possible.


I'll likely just leave my meager total of completed WUs with the Taldren team but my slow and steady trickle of 10-15 WUs per day will cease.


It's been fun...heheh.


 




You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.
 
Title: I have arrived
Post by: The Postman on January 21, 2004, 06:46:32 pm
The Postman  
Results Received  4431
Your rank out of 4846988 total users is:  48458th place.  
The number of users who have this rank:  22  
 You have completed more work units than  99.000% of our users.    
   
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on January 21, 2004, 06:50:22 pm
Quote:

You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.




Any particular reason for the change?  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 22, 2004, 11:19:28 am
Quote:

Quote:

You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.




Any particular reason for the change?  




Yes.  But it's a Dynaverse thing.
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 22, 2004, 12:48:39 pm
so anyone here know how to run SETI client on Linux ?

Think I got the client, but before I go nuts with it, I thought I would get some tips.

I need to find a way to get my numbers up!

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Mazeppa on January 25, 2004, 01:30:34 pm
Quote:

so anyone here know how to run SETI client on Linux ?

Think I got the client, but before I go nuts with it, I thought I would get some tips.

I need to find a way to get my numbers up!

GE-Raven
   




First of all, nice pic.

Next...."I need to find a way to get my numbers up"....LOL

Try:

http://theconsortium.info/print.php?sid=18

http://www.setiteam.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&catid=&topic=6

To see if these might help.

Maz  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 28, 2004, 05:17:00 am
Yay i made 3k wus

 24) Lobo   3024 3.179 years 9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003 United States
25) f9TH SIR X   3004 2.433 years 7 hr 05 min 44.4 sec Tue Jan 27 05:49:54 2004 New Zealand
26) Bill Castner   2935 2.085 years 6 hr 13 min 19.3 sec Wed Jan 28 08:21:52 2004 United States

 And who is the new Dizzy hater in 9th place    
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 28, 2004, 08:42:12 am
Quote:



 And who is the new Dizzy hater in 9th place    




LOL! The one time in a month I check this thread it comes on the heels of a post like this.

Sheesh!
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 29, 2004, 04:37:18 am
Well its here in black and white

 9) Dizzy is a Dirty Cheating Snothead   8977 11.217 years 10 hr 56 min 45.1 sec Fri Jan 16 14:04:29 2004 United States
   
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 29, 2004, 05:08:32 am
I dont understand. wtf is that?
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Pirate on January 30, 2004, 03:28:22 am
  Its the person who is in 9th place team name

1) Raven   225963 135.199 years 5 hr 14 min 28.7 sec Thu Jan 29 17:46:22 2004 United States
2) ICE Gambler   44125 38.506 years 7 hr 38 min 40.0 sec Thu Jan 29 16:00:24 2004 United States
3) Phillip Showel   31351 27.345 years 7 hr 38 min 26.0 sec Thu Jan 29 18:32:35 2004 United States
4) Dragon93   19094 26.309 years 12 hr 04 min 12.7 sec Thu Jan 29 16:26:54 2004 United States
5) IKV Nemesis   14486 6.299 years 3 hr 48 min 32.6 sec Thu Jan 29 04:13:42 2004 Canada
6) Max Peck   14041 8.568 years 5 hr 20 min 42.6 sec Thu Jan 29 18:11:39 2004 Canada
7) Sethan   9298 6.031 years 5 hr 40 min 54.6 sec Thu Jan 29 16:36:50 2004 United States
8) KD4   9209 5.136 years 4 hr 53 min 09.7 sec Thu Jan 29 17:07:27 2004 United States
  9) Dizzy is a Dirty Cheating Snothead   8977 11.217 years 10 hr 56 min 45.1 sec Fri Jan 16 14:04:29 2004 United States  
10) Noah Wallace III   8651 7.531 years 7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004 United States
11) Kenneth Yeast   7894 6.818 years 7 hr 33 min 55.6 sec Thu Jan 29 18:02:13 2004 United States
12) Nasim  7402 3.019 years 3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003 Canada
13) ChAotiCIllusion   6745 2.657 years 3 hr 27 min 04.8 sec Thu Jan 29 11:08:51 2004 United Kingdom
14) KBF-Dogmatix    5811 4.097 years 6 hr 10 min 32.6 sec Sun Jan 18 04:23:20 2004 United States
15) Intrepid-XC   5089 4.430 years 7 hr 37 min 35.2 sec Thu Jan 29 17:07:30 2004 United States
16) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
17) Sven Forkbeard   4834 7.140 years 12 hr 56 min 22.0 sec Thu Jan 29 13:40:38 2004 United States
18) The Postman   4573 2.667 years 5 hr 06 min 33.6 sec Thu Jan 29 16:18:18 2004 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States
20) SGM RAS   4046 6.853 years 14 hr 50 min 18.0 sec Sat Jan 3 14:15:19 2004 United States
21) RazalYllib   3669 3.833 years 9 hr 09 min 06.8 sec Thu Jan 29 03:19:48 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3575 1.580 years 3 hr 52 min 14.5 sec Wed Jan 28 04:45:04 2004 United States
23) Ronbo   3334 2.628 years 6 hr 54 min 17.7 sec Thu Jan 29 08:26:22 2004 United States
24) Lobo   3024 3.179 years 9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003 United States
25) f9TH SIR X   3017 2.439 years 7 hr 04 min 58.5 sec Thu Jan 29 08:22:05 2004 New Zealand
26) Bill Castner   2945 2.088 years 6 hr 12 min 41.2 sec Thu Jan 29 18:42:16 2004 United States
27) Jim   2729 2.210 years 7 hr 05 min 42.0 sec Thu Jan 29 11:42:58 2004 United States
28) digi  2359 8106 hr 53 min 3 hr 26 min 11.6 sec Fri Dec 19 22:14:35 2003 United Kingdom

  And no i dont know who it is  
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: KD4 on January 30, 2004, 04:05:19 am
who was in that spot a few days before?    
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: GE-Raven on January 30, 2004, 09:14:46 am
Originally posted by Mazeppa:

Quote:



You might get a chuckle out of the new user list.
   




Any help?

 
Title: Re: My 2nd anniversery on the team.
Post by: Dizzy on January 30, 2004, 09:38:51 am
yeah, lets find out who it is, hehe. Its obvious its prolly a D2 player. I want to find out so I can hunt his ass down and kill him on the next server. I'll bet he will be playing RDSL... Muhahahahaha!!!
Title: Anybody miss me?
Post by: Dragon93 on February 05, 2004, 05:55:26 pm
So once again, the demands of life, employment and other things have sucked away most of my free time and I have been absent from the forum for a bit. I also went through a bit of an anti-social phase as I am wont to do from time to time.

Anyway, I decided to drop in and say hello as it has been far too long. Still pumping out WUs, though that is mostly on autopilot right now. I was quite surprised to see that I am creeping up to the 20,000 mark in the near future...

Good to see things are still cooking and good to see some familiar names.

Until next time...
 
Title: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: GE-Raven on February 09, 2004, 04:22:30 pm
Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: The Postman on February 10, 2004, 01:50:13 pm
Quote:

Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
   




Why don't you go back to the screen saver on these machines?  
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: DreadlordGW on February 10, 2004, 07:25:31 pm
From my experience even the screensaver interferes somewhat.

Quote:

Quote:

Unfortunately I have found a program that having seti command client running affects it adversely.  Due to the necessity of this program on the 45 best machines my University has I will now have a much lower WU per day average.

Sigh...

Oh well it was a good run.

GE-Raven
   




Why don't you go back to the screen saver on these machines?  


Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: digi on February 11, 2004, 03:42:40 am
I've been away from SETI crunching for a couple of months now, but I thought I'd come back.  I've just got a new machine to add into the fray.  Dual 2.8Ghz H/T P4.  Very sweet - its running 4 units at once.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on February 11, 2004, 07:37:54 pm
Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: Bob Graham on February 18, 2004, 05:30:33 pm
Long time no speak all.  What is this 'BONIC' and is it as evil as the name sounds?
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: digi on March 17, 2004, 05:52:34 am
Quote:

Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.    





How goes the quest to beat Mexico?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Age on March 17, 2004, 01:19:21 pm
    You are right Nemesis you do spend a lot of time in here and this is a big Thread to big to sink my teeth into
 I though you meant Canadas place in the sun.I guess I will have to read all this sometime and when I get it .

  Let just not argue about are ships ok  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sirgod on March 17, 2004, 01:36:57 pm
Welcome here Age, If you have broadband, then Please sign up, and help the taldren team out. I know you can do It with dial up, But It does help for prossesing alot of WU's.

and yes, I'll try and get back on the bandwagon again and Get a few WU's done at night.

stephen
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: The Postman on March 17, 2004, 03:12:34 pm
Quote:

Quote:

 
Quote:

 12/19/03

Mexico Team - 505310
Taldren - 472414
 




as of
January 17, 2004

Mexico Team - 526,155
Taldren          - 498,222

Mexico produced - 20,845
Taldren produced- 25,808

For a net gain of 4963  




As of 2/11/04
135) Mexico Team - 546135
142) Taldren          - 525042

I don't think we are going to catch them before BOINC takes over.    




As of 3/14/04

Mexico  572021
Taldren  552530

Since 2/11, Mexico has produced 25,886
Since 2/11, Taldren has produced 27,488
for a net gain of 1602 or 50.06/day
At this pace, it will take 389.35 days to catch Mexico  
Title: Re: new goal
Post by: digi on March 17, 2004, 04:00:05 pm
Ouch - Thats a long time.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 12:37:32 am
Quote:

    You are right Nemesis you do spend a lot of time in here and this is a big Thread to big to sink my teeth into
 I though you meant Canadas place in the sun.I guess I will have to read all this sometime and when I get it .

  Let just not argue about are ships ok    




Not argue debate .   I didn't take it too seriously.

Since no one has posted a team list in a long time here is one:

Top Members:
Name (and URL)    Results received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     252484    149.524 years    5 hr 11 min 15.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:22:07 2004    United States
2) ICE Gambler     48806    42.022 years    7 hr 32 min 32.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:12:29 2004    United States
3) Phillip Showel     31589    27.548 years    7 hr 38 min 21.6 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:19:35 2004    United States
4) Dragon93     21524    29.278 years    11 hr 54 min 57.3 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:47:19 2004    United States
 5) IKV Nemesis     16476    7.055 years    3 hr 45 min 03.5 sec    Thu Mar 18 06:32:08 2004    Canada
6) Max Peck     14617    8.844 years    5 hr 18 min 01.0 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:34:14 2004    Canada
7) KD4     9919    5.366 years    4 hr 44 min 20.6 sec    Thu Mar 18 04:27:16 2004    United States
8) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
9) Dizzy is Still a Snot     9125    11.437 years    10 hr 58 min 45.2 sec    Fri Mar 12 15:51:25 2004    United States
10) Noah Wallace III    8651    7.531 years    7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec    Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004    United States
11) Kenneth Yeast     8606    7.175 years    7 hr 18 min 11.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:39:59 2004    United States
12) ChAotiCIllusion     7576    2.903 years    3 hr 21 min 23.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:34:40 2004    United Kingdom
13) Nasim    7402    3.019 years    3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec    Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003    Canada
14) KBF-Dogmatix     5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
15) The Postman     5479    3.194 years    5 hr 06 min 24.0 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:50:08 2004    United States
16) Intrepid-XC     5345    4.656 years    7 hr 37 min 51.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:54:51 2004    United States
17) Sven Forkbeard     4939    7.247 years    12 hr 51 min 09.9 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:49:02 2004    United States
18) Fahrenheit    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
19) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
20) SGM RAS     4131    6.958 years    14 hr 45 min 14.3 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:49:24 2004    United States
21) RazalYllib     4009    4.018 years    8 hr 46 min 46.4 sec    Wed Mar 17 15:14:15 2004    United States
22) RedHotChiliDog    3626    1.601 years    3 hr 52 min 04.3 sec    Wed Mar 17 12:56:52 2004    United States
23) Ronbo     3374    2.701 years    7 hr 00 min 44.8 sec    Wed Mar 17 12:21:01 2004    United States
24) f9TH SIR X     3248    2.548 years    6 hr 52 min 23.5 sec    Tue Mar 16 10:30:47 2004    New Zealand
25) Bill Castner     3230    2.252 years    6 hr 06 min 26.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 04:55:40 2004    United States
26) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
27) Jim     2916    2.331 years    7 hr 00 min 14.2 sec    Sun Mar 14 23:10:47 2004    United States
28) digi    2872    1.152 years    3 hr 30 min 53.9 sec    Wed Mar 17 08:31:53 2004    United Kingdom
29) hobbesmaster     2613    1.610 years    5 hr 23 min 55.8 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:47:23 2004    United States
30) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
31) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
32) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
33) Reffet     2095    1.584 years    6 hr 37 min 28.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:30:09 2004    United States
34) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
35) BobGraham     1846    1.161 years    5 hr 30 min 37.7 sec    Thu Mar 18 00:33:28 2004    United States
36) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
37) Hollis J. Wood    1666    1.313 years    6 hr 54 min 08.2 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:41:29 2004    Canada
38) Malystryx_XC     1417    1.578 years    9 hr 45 min 24.7 sec    Mon Mar 15 20:45:47 2004    United States
39) Xeir     1242    2.477 years    17 hr 28 min 20.8 sec    Sun Mar 7 21:47:03 2004    United States
40) Iceman     1238    1.218 years    8 hr 37 min 10.0 sec    Mon Oct 27 05:14:57 2003    United States
41) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
42) Kroma BaSyl    1129    5548 hr 26 min    4 hr 54 min 52.1 sec    Sat Oct 11 14:26:50 2003    United States
43) lapt    1076    1.095 years    8 hr 54 min 48.1 sec    Wed Mar 17 20:13:16 2004    United States
44) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
45) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
46) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
47) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
48) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
49) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
50) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
51) Daniel     695    1.190 years    14 hr 59 min 58.4 sec    Wed Mar 17 17:33:07 2004    United States
52) davezzzz    678    7598 hr 32 min    11 hr 12 min 26.2 sec    Wed Mar 17 05:26:49 2004    United States
53) Harlequin     621    4614 hr 18 min    7 hr 25 min 49.5 sec    Wed Oct 1 19:41:36 2003    United Kingdom
54) thirdleg     601    2758 hr 38 min    4 hr 35 min 24.3 sec    Fri Feb 6 03:35:28 2004    United States
55) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
56) TalonClaw     579    1.461 years    22 hr 06 min 07.3 sec    Fri Feb 27 17:03:43 2004    United States
57) Toasty0    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
58) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids     546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
59) Speaker to Aliens     500    8402 hr 09 min    16 hr 48 min 15.5 sec    Sun Dec 7 01:05:53 2003    United Kingdom
60) Ogma     485    5957 hr 47 min    12 hr 17 min 02.7 sec    Wed Mar 17 20:47:10 2004    United States
61) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
62) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
63) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
64) Towelie     406    4316 hr 02 min    10 hr 37 min 50.2 sec    Sat Feb 28 04:30:36 2004    United States
65) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
66) Tanked_Up     397    4973 hr 51 min    12 hr 31 min 42.9 sec    Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2003    United Kingdom
67) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
68) Lancer of TAC     311    4673 hr 17 min    15 hr 01 min 35.9 sec    Tue Dec 2 04:57:06 2003    United States
69) Spectre     295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
70) awm3     287    2510 hr 14 min    8 hr 44 min 47.4 sec    Thu Mar 18 05:28:06 2004    Canada
71) Grimklink     280    1.044 years    32 hr 40 min 25.4 sec    Mon Mar 15 13:44:10 2004    United States
72) Captain_Krenn     280    4547 hr 47 min    16 hr 14 min 31.5 sec    Fri Mar 5 05:39:16 2004    United States
73) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
74) Rick Regan     278    3475 hr 08 min    12 hr 30 min 01.7 sec    Thu Jan 23 18:57:39 2003    United States
75) SPQR Kremen     275    1688 hr 36 min    6 hr 08 min 25.5 sec    Tue Mar 16 11:23:12 2004    Australia
76) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
77) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
78) Otenki     184    1072 hr 48 min    5 hr 49 min 49.7 sec    Sun Nov 23 14:10:42 2003    Canada
79) jimmythehat    183    1930 hr 48 min    10 hr 33 min 02.9 sec    Mon Dec 29 05:10:33 2003    United States
80) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
81) TAG-Draco     172    1678 hr 13 min    9 hr 45 min 25.8 sec    Thu Mar 18 03:28:17 2004    United States
82) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
83) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
84) Max     158    2447 hr 32 min    15 hr 29 min 26.8 sec    Wed Mar 17 08:13:16 2004    United Kingdom
85) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
86) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
87) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
88) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
89) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
90) Chrisr118     133    748 hr 46 min    5 hr 37 min 47.5 sec    Tue Apr 29 09:44:50 2003    Canada
91) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
92) keravnos     116    2030 hr 45 min    17 hr 30 min 23.3 sec    Wed Mar 17 23:43:57 2004    Greece
93) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
94) Matsukasi     115    6326 hr 12 min    55 hr 00 min 37.9 sec    Sun Mar 14 01:58:36 2004    United States
95) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
96) clintk     96    902 hr 24 min    9 hr 24 min 00.6 sec    Thu Mar 11 08:13:53 2004    United Kingdom
97) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
98) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
99) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
100) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
101) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
102) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
103) Orthae     78    1130 hr 47 min    14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec    Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002    United States
104) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
105) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
106) Lairis     75    829 hr 42 min    11 hr 03 min 46.2 sec    Fri Mar 12 01:31:41 2004    United States
107) Sakrot     71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
108) Rob     62    1433 hr 05 min    23 hr 06 min 52.0 sec    Thu Oct 2 05:12:26 2003    United States
109) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
110) Apocolypse     52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
111) GreenLantern    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
112) sirgod     48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
113) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
114) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
115) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
116) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
117) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
118) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
119) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
120) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
121) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
122) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
123) Tus     24    912 hr 22 min    38 hr 00 min 56.5 sec    Mon Aug 18 16:21:37 2003    United States
124) F9thTheJudge     23    856 hr 36 min    37 hr 14 min 37.5 sec    Tue Mar 9 13:55:38 2004    United States
125) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
126)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
127) Hilton     17    620 hr 39 min    36 hr 30 min 33.1 sec    Mon Mar 15 16:17:08 2004    United States
128) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
129) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
130) SFCSpoonman     16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
131) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
132) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
133) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
134) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
135) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
136) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
137) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
138) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
139) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
140) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
141) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
142) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
143) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
144) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
145) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
146) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
147) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
148) FRA_C_Blade_XC     3    22 hr 18 min    7 hr 26 min 11.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:20:43 2004    United States
149) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
150) Beanardo     2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
151) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
152) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
153) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
154) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
155) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
156) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 12:41:05 am
Quote:

Welcome here Age, If you have broadband, then Please sign up, and help the taldren team out. I know you can do It with dial up, But It does help for prossesing alot of WU's.

stephen  




You don't need broadband if you use the SETIDriver setup I posted.  I did 49WUs yesterday and my current 7 day average is 43.6/day and I am on dialup.

I should probably check the links in that message to see if they are still current and if not post an update.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 01:24:20 am
Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 18, 2004, 06:42:12 am
What is a SETI?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 09:25:04 am
Quote:

What is a SETI?  




     
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on March 18, 2004, 09:30:24 am
Quote:

What is a SETI?  




Search for Extra - Terrestrial Intelligence.

Having found none on the forum, we have decided to look elsewhere

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 09:41:45 am
57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 18, 2004, 10:17:27 am
Quote:

57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 




Thinking of starting up again? We could use your output!    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 18, 2004, 10:21:21 am
I have...but I'm still just one machine fighting against the odds...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 18, 2004, 06:11:14 pm
Quote:

Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  




I will see about fixing it this weekend. Thanks.  It needs to be transferred to this forum anyhow.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 19, 2004, 05:08:59 am
I still don't understand.

What's with the time and date?

How does it work?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 19, 2004, 06:46:48 am
Quote:

57) Toasty0 557 3056 hr 19 min 5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003 United States
 




This person is ranked in 57th place in the Taldren team.
His user name is ToastyO.
He has completed 557 SETI workunits.
His computer(s) spent 3056 hours and 19 minutes crunching these workunits.
5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec is the average time spent on each workunit.
Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003  was the last time he turned in results for processed workunits.
The country is identified because this project has participants from around the world.  
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 19, 2004, 08:33:57 pm
 Funny thing is that for nearly 2 years I haven't been able to run SETI. And I am still #61.  

 I wonder what I would need to do to get it started again on my laptop here. hmmm....  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 19, 2004, 09:48:10 pm
Quote:

Nem,

The simtel link is 404.

Best,
Jerry  




Update made.  

Quote:

I have...but I'm still just one machine fighting against the odds...
Jerry  





That is how I started.  Before The Great Moo Hunt.  Now I have four.  

Link to SETI FAQ

What is SETI @ Home? (abbreviated SAH)

SAH  is a distributed computing project designed to analyze signals recieved by the radio telescope at Arecibo looking for signs of alien intelligence.   Each computer in the project downloads data packets (commonly referred to as Work Units or WUs), processes the WU using either a commandline client (fastest) or a screen saver client (slowest).  SAH is an actual scientific research project running out of the University of Berkeley (SETI Homepage).  

As of earlier today SAH has 4,925,491 total users.  Unfortunately about 1/3 or them never processed a single WU.    
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 20, 2004, 12:14:32 am

  After a year and a half off,  I finally rejoined Team Taldren.
*applause and cheering in background)

  So shortly I will be chompin away at them work units. Too bad my MIS on base won't let me run it on the gov't comp.
 Anywaym what is sad is that either I don't remember my email addy from that far back or Seti deleted it after being inactive for so long. In either case, my first goal is to beat myself.
*snicker*
 

 Nevermind. I had a Beavis and Butthead moment.
 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 20, 2004, 09:27:13 am
Nem,

I'm experiencing issues with the Seti Client running on my machine. Not sure what it is yet, but one of the things is I think it is using up all my resources even though I have it set for "low".

ack!

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 20, 2004, 11:58:03 am
1/ What OS are you using?

2/ Did you use my SETIDriver set up?

3/ Symptoms?  All programs or only some (which programs have you tried?)

 
Title: Re: My Party (as it was) is now over.
Post by: nexa1 on March 20, 2004, 07:14:31 pm
Now at 142 and climbing. whoo hoo!!! I figure by May I should overtake my old spot of #61  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 02:08:51 am
Quote:

1/ What OS are you using?

2/ Did you use my SETIDriver set up?

3/ Symptoms?  All programs or only some (which programs have you tried?)

   




I may have found it. Seems that NeroBurns INCd packet writing software likes to conflict with several other programs including McAfee's virus detection software. So, this may also be suspect in regards to the SETI CLI. I'll let you know after a couple days of testing/running.

Best,
Jerry  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 06:35:37 am
Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 07:40:56 am
Quote:

Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?  




Essentially correct.  One thing to add however is if you are the lucky one to do the processing that finds ET you will be publicly credited with it.  Your 15 minutes of fame.  

My Data:

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    16613
Total CPU Time    7.107 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 44 min 51.0 sec
Average results received per day    20.99
Last result returned:   Sun Mar 21 13:30:59 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   2.168 years
Your group info:
You belong to the group named:    Taldren
You are not currently the founder of any teams.
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 4927160 total users is:    8125th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    2
You have completed more work units than    99.835% of our users.

There are other projects that use the SETI concept to do other research.  Cancer and Anthrax research for example.   SETI was merely first and biggest.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 09:45:45 am
Quote:

Ok... let me see if I get this.....

A university receives "signals".
They are put into "units".
People with computers download software to "crunch" these "units" made of "signals".
You receive a "scoring" by how long, or how many, of these "units" you "crunch" to discover where these "signals" are coming from.
There is no pay in the use of your personal computer even though you are providing the resourses in which to "crunch" the "units" made of "signals".

Is this correct?  




Now only that, but in your case you might actually find Star Man.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 12:30:24 pm
But, of course, no one ever finds an ET.

Sooooooooooooo, why do you do this?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: jualdeaux on March 21, 2004, 01:16:03 pm
I think that some people do it in the hope that someone will ultimately find a signal. Others might just do it o be a part of a group of like minded people. There are also some who just like the challenge of trying to work their way up through the ranks and try to get to the top of th list. Iin this group alone there were a number of people had an informal, or formal, race to see who could produce the most. That lead to quite a few races that ultimately increased the performance of the group and also lead to people learning more about the computers they used and how to get the most out of them. I distinctly remember people building totally new computers just sothey would have much better processing times.   Anyway, there are many reasons people joined the group.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 21, 2004, 01:49:40 pm
   

As you can see the Arecibo Radio Telescope only covers a fraction of the sky. Every red dot is a potential signal, however unlikely, where ET might be found. ET might be found in another part of the sky or ET's signal might not reach Earth for another thousand years. Who really knows? We certainly won't find him if we don't look.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: KRolling on March 21, 2004, 03:16:12 pm
Ok, I understand now.

<backs out of room.... turns and runs>
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 10:04:58 pm
Quote:

But, of course, no one ever finds an ET.

Sooooooooooooo, why do you do this?  




No one has to date.  

Of course there was a time when people were told the same about hunting for the mythical city of Troy.  Then one day some one found it, it was not a myth afterall.  

Perhaps today will be the day SETI finds a signal.  But not if no one is looking.   I will keep looking for my mythical signal.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 21, 2004, 11:20:55 pm
Quote:

Microsoft man funds ET search

March 21, 2004 - 1:52AM

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, one of the richest men on Earth, today pledged to donate $US13.5 million ($17.99 million) for research into extra-terrestrial life.

With the contribution, Allen will have given $US25 million ($33.32 million) for construction of the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), a network of 350 radio telescopes being built to find signs of life in space, said Thomas Pierson, director of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute.

The radio telescopes will measure the density of the early universe, the formation of stars and magnetic fields.

They will also be capable of searching for "possible signals from technologically advanced civilisations elsewhere in the galaxy," according to a SETI statement.

The announcement of Allen's donation coincided with the completion of the project's research and development phases, which Allen funded with an $US11.5 million ($15.33 million) donation.

The $US13.5 million donation will pay for the first two phases of construction of the ATA, according to the statement.

One network of 32 telescopes will be available for research by the end of 2004 and the entire network of 350 telescopes will be completed "late in the decade," it said.

SETI and the Radio Astronomy Laboratory of the University of California at Berkley teamed up for the ATA project.

"I am very excited to be supporting one of the world's most visionary efforts to seek basic answers to some of the fundamental question about our universe and what other civilisations may exist elsewhere," Allen said in a ceremony in Mountain View, California, where SETI is based.


 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Toasty0 on March 21, 2004, 11:24:35 pm
oh, those evil MS bast'ds...how dare they promote progressive research. *gasp*

hehehehe...meanwhile in other news, Linux claims to have found another Kernal Sanders...  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: ActiveX on March 22, 2004, 11:33:52 am
I'm looking now hehe...

I only got 4 WUs done sofar, but it took less than 18 hours for them...

To catch up to Raven though I'll need to build more than an FX-53 hehe...
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 22, 2004, 02:05:44 pm
Kick Butt Active!!!!


 I know what you are saying about Raven. lol. I doubt even the collective work of my bases antiquainted computers can catch that guy.

 Me... Right now I am just focused on beating Rick Knox(pneumonic81), Hawkeye and myself. Seems to be a bit more feasable.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 22, 2004, 06:37:47 pm
Quote:

oh, those evil MS bast'ds...how dare they promote progressive research. *gasp*

hehehehe...meanwhile in other news, Linux claims to have found another Kernal Sanders...  




Actually as I understand it Paul Allen left the company a long time ago.  Before they were known as evil bostiches.   Paul Allen is also the guy funding Spaceship One.   He seems to be more of a visionary and less a power seeker then his ex-partner Gates.  Unlike Gates he makes little or no effort to publicize his philanthropy.   He quietly does what he does without seeking public recognition.    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 22, 2004, 06:46:34 pm
Spaceship one set to make second powered flight. Story is at space.com.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 23, 2004, 04:14:53 am
   What happened in the first powered flight? I thought that they lost it the first time.

Oh!!!
 I know I have been gone for almost 2 years, but what is the deal with the Taldrenite Haven? I recogonize some of the names from when Erik and the community first started the Taldren team, and what I think became the biggest or second biggest thread. I remember that monster Star Wars vs Star Trek thread might have been the biggest, oh and that plasma thread.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 23, 2004, 06:01:40 am
I see we picked up a couple of new names. Anybody spot who or where they are?  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 23, 2004, 08:10:58 am
Does anybody have an extra P4 400mhz lying around surplus to their needs? I am currently running a 1.5  and thought it might be a good time to upgrade.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: ActiveX on March 23, 2004, 08:52:00 am
I'm at 138th place right now...

136th now
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 23, 2004, 11:40:23 am
Dunno. I'm just Gate crashing at the moment. I will probably pick it up in a couple of months.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Stormbringer on March 23, 2004, 11:41:43 am
It crashed IIRC but they repaired the damage and fixed the issues that caused it.  As to the havens I think they moved thier groups comms to another forum at the TCS. I think they are still active. Some of thier members had a disagreement with enforcement of taldren forum rules and left. The rest followed the core over there but most are still active here just not regarding the havens.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 23, 2004, 02:59:10 pm
 Hey there...

  Well, I am new sort of. *snicker*
 Ok, not really. I have just been gone for a while (year and a half). I have that military thing going on.
 Currently my old SETI acct is #61 but my current one is #125 and creeping up.  I should be able to overtake Rick Knox at #121 in about 6 hours and then it is on to Hawkeye.  
 What ever happened to him or Xak Tsaroth?
 
Title: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 23, 2004, 07:22:35 pm
7) KD4     10003     5.393 years    4 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Tue Mar 23 23:43:09 2004    United States

Congratulations on joining the 5 figure club and on your new certificate.  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 23, 2004, 07:32:57 pm
Quote:

   What happened in the first powered flight? I thought that they lost it the first time.

Oh!!!
 I know I have been gone for almost 2 years, but what is the deal with the Taldrenite Haven? I recogonize some of the names from when Erik and the community first started the Taldren team, and what I think became the biggest or second biggest thread. I remember that monster Star Wars vs Star Trek thread might have been the biggest, oh and that plasma thread.  




There was a landing gear malfunction.  Minimal damage.  We discussed it here at the time (see link below)

Link to thread  
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: nexa1 on March 24, 2004, 02:07:01 pm
 Thanks Nem.
 I think the next cool thing as far as space goes is that we have a sattelite arriving at Saturn in June this year. It is supposed to have some probes go into the atmosphere of Titan.
 Cassini mission
  Anyway.... I am gradually movng up. It is a shame that so many people have gone inactive. But newcomers ActiveX and Cross are making great progress, infact I think cross will be passig me up tommorow. Good stuff.
   
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 24, 2004, 02:32:47 pm
Quote:

7) KD4     10003     5.393 years    4 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Tue Mar 23 23:43:09 2004    United States

Congratulations on joining the 5 figure club and on your new certificate.  






thanks. after all these years i finly make the 10,000 mark  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 24, 2004, 09:07:15 pm
Quote:


thanks. after all these years i finly make the 10,000 mark  




How many calendar years did it take?  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 25, 2004, 05:34:21 am
i started on may 17 1999. changed isp and forgot to get my password and had to start new account dec 29 1999. for some time i used a old 266. only in the last year did i start useing 2 computers.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 27, 2004, 12:25:08 am
Quote:

i started on may 17 1999. changed isp and forgot to get my password and had to start new account dec 29 1999. for some time i used a old 266. only in the last year did i start useing 2 computers.  




Nearly 5 years on SETI?  You are one of the old timers.  At just past two years I am rather a Johnny come lately.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: KD4 on March 27, 2004, 05:12:43 am
lol ya i am a old timer. when i frist heard about it i could see the posabilty for future research in other fields. think of all the computers that set on screan saver all night. i tried some of the medical research a few years back but i found them to be to intrusive. with seti driver set on low i dont ever notice it taking away from what i am doing. i realy dont think our tech is far enough alone to where we have much of a chance to find anything.
If there is a more worthy project out there that will work like seti driver i would be willing to move to that if we did it as a team.
sorry but its 6 am and time for me to go to bed  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 28, 2004, 11:01:43 pm
Quote:

lol ya i am a old timer. when i frist heard about it i could see the posabilty for future research in other fields. think of all the computers that set on screan saver all night. i tried some of the medical research a few years back but i found them to be to intrusive. with seti driver set on low i dont ever notice it taking away from what i am doing. i realy dont think our tech is far enough alone to where we have much of a chance to find anything.

If there is a more worthy project out there that will work like seti driver i would be willing to move to that if we did it as a team.
sorry but its 6 am and time for me to go to bed  




We (as a team) were considering at one point what to do after SETI 1 ended and couldn't decide.  Some of the projects look interesting but many of us object to the proprietary nature of the programs.  Then again some of them allow the people behind the system to jump you to another project without even giving you a choice.  

I also don't think it likely that we will find anything.  But it is worth the chance.   The attempt has already proven the practicality of distributed volunteer processing to help scientific research.  

On a more personal level I just achieved a goal

 Your rank out of 4939040 total users is:    7994th place.  

Top 8000 and on to 7500.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: nexa1 on March 31, 2004, 02:46:19 pm
  You kick butt man.  So you are like now officially one of the big guns eh?
 
 I still think I will find ET before you.  NAH!
   
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: ActiveX on March 31, 2004, 04:55:32 pm
Im turning them out 1 about every 4 hours and 17 minutes, but you are faster at 3 hours and 39 minutes...

When I put together my uber crunching box, I'll be spittin 2 an hour hehe...
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on March 31, 2004, 05:12:35 pm
Quote:

  You kick butt man.  So you are like now officially one of the big guns eh?
 
 I still think I will find ET before you.  NAH!
   




Intermediate gun.  Guys like Raven are the big guns.  

Just so long as someone finds ET its all good.  

 
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: nexa1 on April 02, 2004, 06:21:05 pm
LOL...

 You are cool Nem.

On a side not, I should break the top 100 in about 12 hours.  
Title: Re: KD4 sneaks by the 10,000 mark.
Post by: ActiveX on April 03, 2004, 02:47:48 am
I still got 40 to go till I get that far...
Title: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 03, 2004, 08:39:26 pm
Quote:

LOL...

 You are cool Nem.

On a side not, I should break the top 100 in about 12 hours.  




Quote:

99) nexa1     90    333 hr 25 min    3 hr 42 min 16.8 sec    Sun Apr 4 00:33:59 2004    United States




Congratulations on reaching that landmark.  Always nice to see someone moving up the ranks.    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: nexa1 on April 05, 2004, 05:36:06 am
 Well, it is a big one for me considering that it took so long to crunch units with my last computer.
 So these are my stats now.
62) nexa1   476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
98) nexa1     97   357 hr 52 min   3 hr 41 min 21.9 sec Mon Apr 5 07:53:19 2004 United States

 And check out ActiveX he's movin too. Whoo hoo!
110) ActiveX   68 291 hr 12 min 4 hr 16 min 57.2 sec Mon Apr 5 02:43:40 2004 United States

 I am not sure what happened to Cross here. He was doing so well, but I guess he had to stop for some reason. If he hadn't he wold have passed me already.
111) Cross   65 202 hr 22 min 3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004 United States

 So anything big going on with the team?
 
Oh hey Nemesis... what is your nations name?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 05, 2004, 04:03:02 pm
Well, I have just added a 350mhz P2 to the mix. My average time will probably start going up now.  It seems to be pushing them out about every 14 - 15 hours.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 05, 2004, 05:14:45 pm
Quote:

 Well, it is a big one for me considering that it took so long to crunch units with my last computer.
 So these are my stats now.
62) nexa1   476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
98) nexa1     97   357 hr 52 min   3 hr 41 min 21.9 sec Mon Apr 5 07:53:19 2004 United States

 And check out ActiveX he's movin too. Whoo hoo!
110) ActiveX   68 291 hr 12 min 4 hr 16 min 57.2 sec Mon Apr 5 02:43:40 2004 United States

 I am not sure what happened to Cross here. He was doing so well, but I guess he had to stop for some reason. If he hadn't he wold have passed me already.
111) Cross   65 202 hr 22 min 3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004 United States

 So anything big going on with the team?
 
Oh hey Nemesis... what is your nations name?




You mean my Nationstates nation?  If so I bet you feel silly now  

At present nothing "big" is going on.  Just a slow steady climb.    Feel free to start something.  Seriously, some of the highest points of activity came when two (or more) people were in a race up the ranks.    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 05, 2004, 05:25:52 pm
My nation is 14th for Compassionate...
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 05, 2004, 05:41:26 pm
Quote:

My nation is 14th for Compassionate...  




"IKV Nemesis is ranked 27th in the region and 116,781st in the world for Most Compassionate Citizens."

 What do you expect of a Klingon?    
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 05, 2004, 05:43:12 pm
Oh nothing hehe, Im just a wee widdle nation of not even 30 million...
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: nexa1 on April 05, 2004, 09:33:20 pm

 lol

I just started yesterday. I'm puny  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 07, 2004, 09:25:09 pm
18) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States

20) RazalYllib   4170 4.107 years 8 hr 37 min 37.6 sec Wed Apr 7 16:04:19 2004 United States

21) SGM RAS   4160 6.991 years 14 hr 43 min 16.1 sec Wed Apr 7 18:12:27 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3648 1.610 years 3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004 United States

Finally got my 20 spot back.
My new box helped considerably.
Now how long can I stay?
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: ActiveX on April 07, 2004, 09:34:06 pm
Well looks like Chilidog will get you in maybe a quarter?
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 07, 2004, 09:45:03 pm
Quote:


 lol

I just started yesterday. I'm puny  




You have to start somewhere.

Persist and you will grow.  Rather like here on the SETI team.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 07, 2004, 09:46:18 pm
Quote:

18) Fahrenheit   4852 6.747 years 12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003 United States
19) Renegade001   4490 3.744 years 7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003 United States

20) RazalYllib   4170 4.107 years 8 hr 37 min 37.6 sec Wed Apr 7 16:04:19 2004 United States

21) SGM RAS   4160 6.991 years 14 hr 43 min 16.1 sec Wed Apr 7 18:12:27 2004 United States
22) RedHotChiliDog  3648 1.610 years 3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004 United States

Finally got my 20 spot back.
My new box helped considerably.
Now how long can I stay?  




How many work units a day do you produce?  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 08, 2004, 07:16:56 am
never enough...

With my new box,
I churn through approx 10WU every 2.5 days or so,

Wife's (my hand me down),
clunks along with about 5 in the same period of time.
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 09, 2004, 04:51:15 pm
Quote:

never enough...




Funny, but that is how I feel about my output.  I suspect that if I could match Raven I would still be looking for ways to boost it.

Quote:

With my new box,
I churn through approx 10WU every 2.5 days or so,

Wife's (my hand me down),
clunks along with about 5 in the same period of time.  




6/day, more than many others.  Should be enough to keep you in the top 20.  Keep on chugging away.  
Title: Re: nexa1 slips into the top 100 of our team.
Post by: RazalYllib on April 09, 2004, 05:40:03 pm
Yeah I know

 just keep swimming, just keep swimming.....


Save my pennies for a new box and up my production is my next goal

 Keep trying to get my associates to install (with my acct) they just stare at me in utter disbelief when I try to explain Seti@Home and distributed computing.

Couple of them saw the screensaver, said it looked pretty, but I told them it goes quicker if you dont see it.
That also got vacent stares then,
If its not pretty, why should this be my screen saver ?

At this point I usually abandon the idea
Title: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 10, 2004, 02:06:06 am
 2) ICE Gambler     50049     42.860 years    7 hr 30 min 06.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 05:21:41 2004    United States  

That will be a nice certificate, one I don't expect to ever reach.      
Title: Re: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: The Postman on April 10, 2004, 08:13:45 am
Right now I am just trying to reach 10,000 before the switch.  I am not too sure how many boxes I will be able to keep online after the switch to BOINC.  
Title: Re: ICE Gambler sneaks past 50,000 WUs. Congratulations!
Post by: Gambler on April 10, 2004, 09:17:38 am
Quote:

 2) ICE Gambler     50049     42.860 years    7 hr 30 min 06.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 05:21:41 2004    United States  

That will be a nice certificate, one I don't expect to ever reach.      




Whoa, I have a confession to make, I've still got SETI running on my farm, but I haven't really been paying attention to it.

This is also a landmark I had never expected to receive.
Title: ActiveX moves into our top 100. Congratulations!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 11, 2004, 12:44:29 am
 100) ActiveX     91    387 hr 27 min    4 hr 15 min 28.3 sec    Sat Apr 10 23:31:06 2004    United States  

Part of the top 100 and soon to be in the triple digits.  Keep it up.  
Title: Re: ActiveX moves into our top 100. Congratulations!
Post by: ActiveX on April 11, 2004, 06:34:38 am
:P
Title: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 11, 2004, 11:25:11 am
Team Stats

Description Taldren, "the Art and Science of Gaming". Creators of "StarFleet Command II : Empires at War" and "Orion Pirates".
Members 138
Results received 165387
Total CPU time 182.040 years
Founder Kenneth Yeast

Top Members:

Name (and URL) Results
received Total CPU time Average CPU time
per work unit Date Last Result Received Country
1) Raven 16736 10.064 years 5 hr 16 min 03.4 sec Fri Jan 17 01:52:39 2003 United States
2) Phillip Showel 16298 16.755 years 9 hr 00 min 19.9 sec Fri Jan 17 01:12:21 2003 United States
3) Cyberkada 15660 7.479 years 4 hr 11 min 01.4 sec Fri Jan 17 00:35:29 2003 United States
4) ICE Gambler 11897 11.143 years 8 hr 12 min 16.3 sec Fri Jan 17 01:46:49 2003 United States
5) Max Peck 8753 6.311 years 6 hr 18 min 59.3 sec Thu Jan 16 23:03:31 2003 Canada
6) Bryan Kinney 4985 3.424 years 6 hr 01 min 01.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:06:50 2003 United States
7) Dragon93 4980 8.292 years 14 hr 35 min 10.0 sec Fri Jan 17 00:20:32 2003 United States
8) Rogue Jedi 4800 5.127 years 9 hr 21 min 27.0 sec Thu Nov 14 17:10:31 2002 United States
9) Mazeppa 4575 6.196 years 11 hr 51 min 49.8 sec Thu Jan 16 23:38:20 2003 United States
10) Sven Forkbeard 4298 6.565 years 13 hr 22 min 46.1 sec Wed Jan 15 23:08:39 2003 United States
11) Noah Wallace 3882 4.842 years 10 hr 55 min 38.6 sec Fri Jan 17 01:08:00 2003 United States
12) Death Merchant 3857 8.847 years 20 hr 05 min 34.4 sec Thu Jan 16 15:13:51 2003 United States
13) moofighters 3829 6.051 years 13 hr 50 min 38.4 sec Fri Jan 17 00:40:23 2003 United States
14) Kenneth Yeast 3636 4.515 years 10 hr 52 min 42.5 sec Fri Jan 17 01:23:42 2003 United States
15) SGM RAS 3340 6.002 years 15 hr 44 min 27.9 sec Thu Jan 16 21:38:48 2003 United States
16) IKV Nemesis  3223 1.686 years 4 hr 34 min 55.9 sec Fri Jan 17 02:00:38 2003 Canada
17) Renegade001 2736 2.911 years 9 hr 19 min 15.6 sec Thu Jan 16 22:24:45 2003 United States
18) KBF-Dogmatix 2470 2.910 years 10 hr 19 min 15.4 sec Thu Jan 16 20:22:56 2003 United States
19) Ronbo 2466 2.036 years 7 hr 13 min 52.2 sec Thu Jan 16 17:36:30 2003 United States
20) Lobo 2282 2.574 years 9 hr 52 min 44.9 sec Thu Jan 16 03:21:08 2003 United States
21) Intrepid-XC 2267 2.329 years 8 hr 59 min 57.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:31:34 2003 United States
22) MagnumMan 2192 4.157 years 16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002 United States
23) Nasim 1872 6865 hr 30 min 3 hr 40 min 02.8 sec Tue Jan 14 13:29:07 2003 Canada
24) JAFO 1852 2.377 years 11 hr 14 min 42.9 sec Mon Jan 6 13:21:52 2003 United States
25) RazalYllib 1835 2.393 years 11 hr 25 min 23.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:47:38 2003 United States
26) Fahrenheit 1776 3.776 years 18 hr 37 min 23.1 sec Fri Jan 17 01:59:46 2003 United States
27) RedHotChiliDog 1713 6559 hr 22 min 3 hr 49 min 45.0 sec Fri Jan 17 01:06:54 2003 United States
28) ChAotiCIllusion 1575 7350 hr 10 min 4 hr 40 min 00.4 sec Thu Jan 16 19:57:48 2003 United Kingdom
29) Jim 1333 1.256 years 8 hr 15 min 06.6 sec Thu Jan 16 23:15:37 2003 United States
30) hobbesmaster 1274 1.021 years 7 hr 01 min 15.4 sec Wed Jan 15 05:17:23 2003 United States
31) Edge10 1101 1.678 years 13 hr 21 min 01.5 sec Thu Jan 16 21:04:58 2003 United States
32) jualdeaux 1003 7938 hr 10 min 7 hr 54 min 51.9 sec Mon Jan 13 03:42:37 2003 United States
33) Bill Castner 913 7477 hr 25 min 8 hr 11 min 23.8 sec Thu Jan 16 21:15:20 2003 United States
34) Aldaron 911 1.289 years 12 hr 23 min 41.1 sec Wed Jan 15 04:18:40 2003 United States
35) John Cencerik 896 1.858 years 18 hr 10 min 11.0 sec Thu Jan 16 11:27:20 2003 United States
36) Zach 870 1.083 years 10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002 United States
37) Michal 753 1.542 years 17 hr 56 min -0.0 sec Thu Jan 9 03:58:14 2003 United States
38) Erik Bethke 746 7244 hr 23 min 9 hr 42 min 39.5 sec Fri Jan 10 01:57:07 2003 United States
39) anarwally 729 2.195 years 26 hr 22 min 16.6 sec Thu Jan 16 12:03:15 2003 United States
40) bupson 710 7851 hr 23 min 11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002 United States
41) Corben Dallas 671 6593 hr 41 min 9 hr 49 min 35.9 sec Thu Jan 16 23:11:49 2003 United States
42) Iceman 667 5988 hr 09 min 8 hr 58 min 39.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:34:12 2003 United States
43) Xeir 645 1.283 years 17 hr 25 min 09.4 sec Fri Jan 17 01:52:28 2003 United States
44) f9TH SIR X 597 5833 hr 42 min 9 hr 46 min 18.1 sec Thu Jan 16 21:42:23 2003 New Zealand
45) AJTK 582 7085 hr 39 min 12 hr 10 min 28.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:03:48 2003 United States
46) Michael Malin 575 1.819 years 27 hr 42 min 26.9 sec Thu Jan 16 18:55:58 2003 United States
47) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids 491 1.538 years 27 hr 25 min 58.2 sec Thu Jan 16 05:02:10 2003 United States
48) Sethan 490 5083 hr 54 min 10 hr 22 min 31.1 sec Thu Jan 16 22:44:25 2003 United States
49) nexa1 476 4895 hr 00 min 10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002 United States
50) Reffet 451 5520 hr 42 min 12 hr 14 min 27.7 sec Thu Jan 16 09:21:27 2003 United States
51) hawkmoon 444 2342 hr 16 min 5 hr 16 min 31.4 sec Fri Nov 1 22:17:46 2002 Netherlands
52) Speaker to Aliens 419 7073 hr 10 min 16 hr 52 min 51.8 sec Fri Jul 26 20:36:29 2002 United Kingdom
53) Ed Lacabanne 418 5781 hr 12 min 13 hr 49 min 50.2 sec Thu Jan 16 21:10:18 2003 United States
54) hawkeye 400 2915 hr 47 min 7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002 United States
55) Kor 373 2212 hr 20 min 5 hr 55 min 52.3 sec Fri Nov 15 08:13:53 2002 United States
56) Hollis J. Wood 371 5365 hr 55 min 14 hr 27 min 48.2 sec Thu Jan 16 18:14:51 2003 Canada
57) Harlequin 370 2234 hr 04 min 6 hr 02 min 16.8 sec Wed Jan 15 20:57:16 2003 United Kingdom
58) BobGraham 360 1836 hr 57 min 5 hr 06 min 09.5 sec Fri Jan 17 00:00:19 2003 United States
59) Mark P. 325 4350 hr 40 min 13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002 United States
60) Tanked_Up 318 3973 hr 32 min 12 hr 29 min 43.4 sec Mon Jan 13 18:26:05 2003 United Kingdom
61) Lancer of TAC 297 4498 hr 56 min 15 hr 08 min 52.6 sec Mon Dec 30 20:36:23 2002 United States
62) Spectre 295 4819 hr 05 min 16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002 United States
63) Rick Regan 269 3378 hr 00 min 12 hr 33 min 27.5 sec Wed Oct 30 19:08:54 2002 United States
64) TalonClaw 253 6880 hr 03 min 27 hr 11 min 38.0 sec Thu Jan 16 21:38:50 2003 United States
65) Grith 195 3451 hr 48 min 17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002 United States
66) Daniel 194 2871 hr 16 min 14 hr 48 min 01.3 sec Thu Jan 16 21:19:32 2003 United States
67) Grimklink 193 6281 hr 54 min 32 hr 32 min 55.5 sec Wed Jan 15 21:49:39 2003 United States
68) David T. Potter 187 1.652 years 77 hr 23 min 14.1 sec Wed Jan 15 06:09:28 2003 United States
69) Traigus 161 3291 hr 59 min 20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002 United States
70) Professional 157 4502 hr 15 min 28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002 Canada
71) Patgod 157 1770 hr 51 min 11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002 United States
72) jimmythehat 153 1570 hr 52 min 10 hr 16 min 01.6 sec Mon Dec 30 14:27:27 2002 United States
73) Alien 3490 147 2758 hr 23 min 18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999 United States
74) Captain_Krenn 120 2044 hr 35 min 17 hr 02 min 17.9 sec Thu Jan 16 16:02:37 2003 United States
75) Grin 117 2341 hr 01 min 20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002 United States
76) Durin 116 1458 hr 04 min 12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002 United States
77) SPQR Kremen 116 879 hr 49 min 7 hr 35 min 04.8 sec Fri Jan 10 03:14:22 2003 Australia
78) DaewAnahos 105 1084 hr 52 min 10 hr 19 min 55.7 sec Thu Jan 16 12:47:15 2003 United States
79) Matolck 91 1736 hr 37 min 19 hr 05 min 01.8 sec Sun Apr 7 07:08:41 2002 France
80) NMZmaster 88 2229 hr 37 min 25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002 United States
81) Tx PnGwin 82 2552 hr 14 min 31 hr 07 min 29.7 sec Sun Jan 12 03:34:16 2003 United States
82) Towelie 80 962 hr 41 min 12 hr 02 min 01.1 sec Wed Dec 4 11:33:40 2002 United States
83) Redshift 79 856 hr 42 min 10 hr 50 min 39.8 sec Thu Sep 5 22:57:02 2002 United Kingdom
84) Orthae 78 1130 hr 47 min 14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002 United States
85) Kevin Luker 78 1138 hr 40 min 14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002 United States
86) Sakrot 71 1377 hr 44 min 19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002 United States
87) JoeRad 62 882 hr 15 min 14 hr 13 min 47.7 sec Wed Jan 8 14:11:29 2003 United States
88) Mentat Jon 62 1315 hr 01 min 21 hr 12 min 36.5 sec Fri Jan 17 01:11:10 2003 United States
89) sirgod 48 772 hr 06 min 16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002 United States
90) sfcjb 47 280 hr 02 min 5 hr 57 min 30.0 sec Thu Jan 16 20:59:42 2003 United States
91) PsychadelicSwinger 45 986 hr 55 min 21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002 United States
92) Toasty0 45 500 hr 26 min 11 hr 07 min 15.3 sec Thu Jan 16 23:58:45 2003 United States
93) Erik Bethke 43 1847 hr 42 min 42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999 United States
94) GreenLantern 43 787 hr 57 min 18 hr 19 min 29.1 sec Thu Jan 16 18:59:22 2003 United States
95) TerranceRoff 41 847 hr 06 min 20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002 United States
96) 3dot14 39 1313 hr 02 min 33 hr 40 min 03.4 sec Sat Dec 14 15:40:10 2002 Canada
97) The Postman 39 277 hr 36 min 7 hr 07 min 04.8 sec Fri Jan 17 01:56:30 2003 United States
98) Tantalus 37 692 hr 35 min 18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002 United Kingdom
99) EE 32 652 hr 46 min 20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002 United States
100) Tim 31 1858 hr 34 min 59 hr 57 min 15.1 sec Wed Jan 15 05:00:12 2003 United States
101) Alien 3491 30 1876 hr 11 min 62 hr 32 min 23.9 sec Sun Nov 28 04:26:13 1999 United States
102) Overloaded Ferrets 29 1138 hr 16 min 39 hr 15 min 02.9 sec Wed Jan 15 12:29:01 2003 United States
103) pneumonic81 25 846 hr 53 min 33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002 United States
104) clintk 25 267 hr 31 min 10 hr 42 min 03.2 sec Mon Jan 13 17:13:31 2003 United Kingdom
105) FMMonty 23 355 hr 17 min 15 hr 26 min 51.5 sec Fri Jan 25 17:29:26 2002 United Kingdom
106) Otenki 23 172 hr 21 min 7 hr 29 min 37.9 sec Sun Jul 7 14:39:08 2002 Canada
107) 5of12 19 128 hr 53 min 6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001 United States
108) FPF-DarkElf 16 861 hr 43 min 53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002 United States
109) SFCSpoonman 16 149 hr 12 min 9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002 United States
110) Robert J Hendry Jr 12 259 hr 45 min 21 hr 38 min 45.7 sec Sun Jun 23 00:22:15 2002 United States
111) Hilton 10 506 hr 01 min 50 hr 36 min 10.9 sec Sat Aug 3 23:54:41 2002 United States
112) BlackJackal 9 698 hr 59 min 77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002 United States
113) Baron Jukaga 8 277 hr 45 min 34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002 Canada
114) MazeppaTest1 8 163 hr 38 min 20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002 United States
115) Jester_Taldren 7 243 hr 32 min 34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001 United States
116) pj lynn 6 234 hr 06 min 39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001 United States
117) Lairis 6 62 hr 52 min 10 hr 28 min 41.7 sec Fri Aug 23 05:54:28 2002 United States
118) Jinxx 5 328 hr 16 min 65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001 United States
119) Obmanta 5 178 hr 47 min 35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002 United States
120) Chili_of_Borg 5 62 hr 53 min 12 hr 34 min 46.3 sec Thu Jan 16 21:55:17 2003 United States
121) Bolitho 4 183 hr 32 min 45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001 United States
122) Catnip_inc 4 353 hr 41 min 88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002 United States
123) GolferDJ 4 89 hr 47 min 22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002 United States
124) Kirk_jr 3 128 hr 22 min 42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000 United States
125) MindBlip 3 39 hr 40 min 13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001 United States
126) Joshua Babb 3 211 hr 29 min 70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001 United States
127) Beanardo 2 30 hr 49 min 15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001 United States
128) GFL-I-Demandred 2 64 hr 46 min 32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002 United Kingdom
129) ArticFire 2 16 hr 25 min 8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002 United States
130) Speaker to Aliens 1 29 hr 40 min 29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999 United Kingdom
131) SKINWALKER 1 61 hr 15 min 61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001 United States
132) Wulgaru 1 9 hr 44 min 9 hr 44 min 58.8 sec Sun Dec 16 18:47:40 2001 Canada
     
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 11, 2004, 08:46:21 pm
You had to dig to find that list. I was in the 97th spot with 39 WU's completed. I have come a long way since then.  
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: GE-Raven on April 12, 2004, 08:03:54 am
Congrats Gambler on the 50K mark... Very cool!!!

And wow that list is blast from the past.  16K units... When I was at "full steam" that would take me about 6 weeks.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: ActiveX on April 12, 2004, 04:58:44 pm
When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 12, 2004, 05:10:10 pm
Quote:

When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'  




The server is down and I can't check the individual stats either. It's them.  
Title: That was then this is now. :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 12, 2004, 07:09:45 pm
Quote:

Quote:

When I went to check it said: 'No such team found'  




The server is down and I can't check the individual stats either. It's them.  




Taldren
Last updated: Mon Apr 12 17:06:11 2004 UTC

Description   Taldren, "the Art and Science of Gaming". Creators of "StarFleet Command II : Empires at War" and "Orion Pirates".
Members   169, Results received   573485, Total CPU time   443.920 years
Founder   Kenneth Yeast

Top Members:
Name (and URL)    Results received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     261969    155.111 years    5 hr 11 min 12.3 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:44:52 2004    United States
2) ICE Gambler     50186    42.953 years    7 hr 29 min 50.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 08:25:43 2004    United States
3) Phillip Showel     31712    27.663 years    7 hr 38 min 29.7 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:48:36 2004    United States
4) Dragon93     22711    30.676 years    11 hr 49 min 56.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:16:10 2004    United States
5) IKV Nemesis     17578    7.472 years    3 hr 43 min 24.5 sec    Tue Apr 13 00:04:58 2004    Canada
6) Max Peck     14818    8.932 years    5 hr 16 min 49.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:32:25 2004    Canada
7) KD4     10321    5.496 years    4 hr 39 min 52.2 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:03:45 2004    United States
8) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
9) Dizzy is Still a Snot     9192    11.552 years    11 hr 00 min 31.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:17:45 2004    United States
10) Kenneth Yeast     8954    7.343 years    7 hr 11 min 01.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:20:45 2004    United States
11) Noah Wallace III    8651    7.531 years    7 hr 37 min 31.5 sec    Thu Jan 1 18:21:25 2004    United States
12) ChAotiCIllusion     7893    3.010 years    3 hr 20 min 25.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 14:52:41 2004    United Kingdom
13) Nasim    7402    3.019 years    3 hr 34 min 22.5 sec    Sun Jul 13 23:11:07 2003    Canada
14) The Postman     5924    3.468 years    5 hr 07 min 42.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:54:26 2004    United States
15) KBF-Dogmatix     5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
16) Intrepid-XC     5443    4.742 years    7 hr 37 min 51.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 05:33:25 2004    United States
17) Sven Forkbeard     4948    7.257 years    12 hr 50 min 53.7 sec    Sun Mar 28 16:19:15 2004    United States
18) Fahrenheit    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
19) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
20) RazalYllib     4218    4.131 years    8 hr 34 min 41.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:49:39 2004    United States
21) SGM RAS     4174    7.005 years    14 hr 42 min 04.6 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:18:06 2004    United States
22) RedHotChiliDog    3648    1.610 years    3 hr 52 min 01.2 sec    Tue Apr 6 11:14:45 2004    United States
23) Bill Castner     3461    2.365 years    5 hr 59 min 13.1 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:00:40 2004    United States
24) Ronbo     3394    2.738 years    7 hr 03 min 58.2 sec    Sun Apr 11 23:23:46 2004    United States
25) f9TH SIR X     3366    2.618 years    6 hr 48 min 44.5 sec    Sun Apr 11 21:12:14 2004    New Zealand
26) digi    3311    1.355 years    3 hr 35 min 04.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:17:55 2004    United Kingdom
27) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
28) Jim     3015    2.399 years    6 hr 58 min 08.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:39:30 2004    United States
29) hobbesmaster     2689    1.645 years    5 hr 21 min 29.2 sec    Tue Apr 6 10:14:39 2004    United States
30) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
31) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
32) Reffet     2128    1.602 years    6 hr 35 min 44.7 sec    Tue Mar 23 00:51:11 2004    United States
33) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
34) BobGraham     1910    1.201 years    5 hr 30 min 37.5 sec    Mon Apr 12 04:19:58 2004    United States
35) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
36) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
37) Hollis J. Wood    1750    1.367 years    6 hr 50 min 31.4 sec    Sat Apr 10 19:30:56 2004    Canada
38) Malystryx_XC     1430    1.600 years    9 hr 48 min 05.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 02:35:14 2004    United States
39) Xeir     1274    2.502 years    17 hr 12 min 23.3 sec    Sun Apr 11 17:23:08 2004    United States
40) lapt    1246    1.202 years    8 hr 27 min 04.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:08:09 2004    United States
41) Iceman     1238    1.218 years    8 hr 37 min 10.0 sec    Mon Oct 27 05:14:57 2003    United States
42) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
43) Kroma BaSyl    1129    5548 hr 26 min    4 hr 54 min 52.1 sec    Sat Oct 11 14:26:50 2003    United States
44) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
45) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
46) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
47) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
48) AJTK     856    1.146 years    11 hr 43 min 54.6 sec    Sun Apr 11 01:41:52 2004    United States
49) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
50) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
51) Daniel     706    1.210 years    15 hr 00 min 33.5 sec    Fri Apr 9 15:48:52 2004    United States
52) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
53) davezzzz    697    8189 hr 54 min    11 hr 45 min 00.8 sec    Mon Apr 12 22:19:58 2004    United States
54) Harlequin     621    4614 hr 18 min    7 hr 25 min 49.5 sec    Wed Oct 1 19:41:36 2003    United Kingdom
55) thirdleg     602    2763 hr 41 min    4 hr 35 min 27.0 sec    Mon Apr 5 03:36:56 2004    United States
56) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
57) TalonClaw     580    1.464 years    22 hr 06 min 14.9 sec    Mon Apr 12 13:48:42 2004    United States
58) Toasty0    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
59) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids     546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
60) Ogma     505    6276 hr 36 min    12 hr 25 min 44.1 sec    Wed Mar 31 01:08:12 2004    United States
61) Speaker to Aliens     500    8402 hr 09 min    16 hr 48 min 15.5 sec    Sun Dec 7 01:05:53 2003    United Kingdom
62) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
63) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
64) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
65) Towelie     406    4316 hr 02 min    10 hr 37 min 50.2 sec    Sat Feb 28 04:30:36 2004    United States
66) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
67) Tanked_Up     397    4973 hr 51 min    12 hr 31 min 42.9 sec    Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2003    United Kingdom
68) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
69) Lancer of TAC     312    4683 hr 08 min    15 hr 00 min 36.2 sec    Fri Mar 26 18:26:57 2004    United States
70) Spectre     295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
71) Captain_Krenn     289    4610 hr 43 min    15 hr 57 min 14.6 sec    Fri Apr 9 17:07:57 2004    United States
72) awm3     288    2515 hr 47 min    8 hr 44 min 07.3 sec    Sat Mar 27 03:26:17 2004    Canada
73) Grimklink     285    1.063 years    32 hr 40 min 29.0 sec    Mon Apr 12 20:21:54 2004    United States
74) SPQR Kremen     283    1729 hr 40 min    6 hr 06 min 42.8 sec    Sat Apr 10 01:07:27 2004    Australia
75) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
76) Rick Regan     278    3475 hr 08 min    12 hr 30 min 01.7 sec    Thu Jan 23 18:57:39 2003    United States
77) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
78) TAG-Draco     207    1924 hr 12 min    9 hr 17 min 44.5 sec    Mon Apr 12 18:00:12 2004    United States
79) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
80) Otenki     184    1072 hr 48 min    5 hr 49 min 49.7 sec    Sun Nov 23 14:10:42 2003    Canada
81) jimmythehat    183    1930 hr 48 min    10 hr 33 min 02.9 sec    Mon Dec 29 05:10:33 2003    United States
82) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
83) Max     173    2699 hr 59 min    15 hr 36 min 24.7 sec    Mon Apr 12 17:26:52 2004    United Kingdom
84) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
85) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
86) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
87) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
88) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
89) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
90) Chrisr118     146    839 hr 57 min    5 hr 45 min 11.4 sec    Mon Apr 12 23:57:43 2004    Canada
91) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
92) nexa1     136    497 hr 23 min    3 hr 39 min 26.2 sec    Mon Apr 12 19:39:11 2004    United States
93) keravnos     123    2092 hr 30 min    17 hr 00 min 43.9 sec    Wed Apr 7 07:16:39 2004    Greece
94) Matsukasi     121    6657 hr 04 min    55 hr 01 min 01.7 sec    Wed Apr 7 11:09:53 2004    United States
95) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
96) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
97) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
98) clintk     101    951 hr 59 min    9 hr 25 min 32.3 sec    Thu Apr 8 10:45:55 2004    United Kingdom
99) ActiveX     96    408 hr 22 min    4 hr 15 min 14.3 sec    Mon Apr 12 21:19:18 2004    United States
100) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
101) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
102) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
103) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
104) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
105) Lairis     80    887 hr 53 min    11 hr 05 min 55.0 sec    Sun Apr 11 17:53:28 2004    United States
106) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
107) Orthae     78    1130 hr 47 min    14 hr 29 min 50.0 sec    Sat Oct 12 18:14:06 2002    United States
108) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
109) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
110) Sakrot     71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
111) Cross     65    202 hr 22 min    3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec    Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004    United States
112) Rob     62    1433 hr 05 min    23 hr 06 min 52.0 sec    Thu Oct 2 05:12:26 2003    United States
113) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
114) Apocolypse     52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
115) GreenLantern    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
116) sirgod     48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
117) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
118) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
119) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
120) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
121) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
122) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
123) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
124) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
125) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
126) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
127) F9thTheJudge     25    931 hr 15 min    37 hr 15 min 01.9 sec    Wed Mar 31 17:20:06 2004    United States
128) Tus     24    912 hr 22 min    38 hr 00 min 56.5 sec    Mon Aug 18 16:21:37 2003    United States
129) Hilton     20    670 hr 50 min    33 hr 32 min 31.2 sec    Wed Apr 7 23:23:10 2004    United States
130) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
131)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
132) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
133) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
134) SFCSpoonman     16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
135) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
136) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
137) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
138) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
139) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
140) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
141) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
142) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
143) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
144) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
145) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
146) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
147) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
148) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
149) FRA_C_Blade_XC     4    31 hr 48 min    7 hr 57 min 01.0 sec    Fri Mar 19 03:22:30 2004    United States
150) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
151) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
152) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
153) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
154) Beanardo     2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
155) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
156) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
157) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
158) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
159) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
160) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States    
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 12, 2004, 07:21:03 pm
Quote:

Congrats Gambler on the 50K mark... Very cool!!!

And wow that list is blast from the past.  16K units... When I was at "full steam" that would take me about 6 weeks.

GE-Raven
   




I AM at full speed.  It would take roughly 54 weeks.  I have less steam than you.    
Title: Team Mexico
Post by: The Postman on April 14, 2004, 05:26:00 pm
From 4/3 to 4/11 Taldren averaged a daily output of 666.9 work units.
Team Mexico averaged 744.3 in the same time frame.

We need to find some more Work units from somewhere.  
Title: Re: Team Mexico
Post by: digi on April 15, 2004, 05:21:07 pm
Finally made the top 25 (hopefully I'll stay there).  My new work machine is adding beautifully to my output!

Results Received  3387
Total CPU Time  1.390 years  
Average CPU Time per work unit  3 hr 35 min 43.7 sec  
Average results received per day  8.59  
Your rank out of 4960424 total users is:  73802nd place.  
The number of users who have this rank:  29  
You have completed more work units than  98.512% of our users.

On a side note, I'll be upgrading my home 2.53Ghz to a 3Ghz this weekend.  Hopefully that'll add a few more units that we need to have to beat the Mexico Team.
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: nexa1 on April 16, 2004, 04:52:25 am
 Hey there...
 I got permission to use 3 computers for a little while. They are slow p3 550MHz. But every little bit helps. I have them set up just like the faq says so hopefully it will be a low maintenance deal. lol.
 I am curious to see how bad my times get.
 Anyone have a suggestion onn how to make the relics kick em out quicker?
 
Title: Re: How far we have come OR a blast from the past.
Post by: The Postman on April 16, 2004, 05:46:02 am
Every bit helps  
Title: WUs acquired from somewhere.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 16, 2004, 07:46:05 pm
Quote:

From 4/3 to 4/11 Taldren averaged a daily output of 666.9 work units.
Team Mexico averaged 744.3 in the same time frame.

We need to find some more Work units from somewhere.  




Description   Taldren,
Members   170
Results received   777684
Total CPU time   544.245 years  
 

Mexico Team
Members   124
Results received   599345
Total CPU time   652.616 years  
 

Anyone know who Putanginamo is?

2) Putanginamo    201013     98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines      

To answer my own question it is Cyberkada.
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 17, 2004, 11:25:03 pm
 104) Taldren   170   778859    544.873 years   6 hr 07 min 41.8 sec  

134) Mexico Team   124   600191   653.169 years   9 hr 31 min 59.6 sec  

So long as Cyber stays on the team we have the goal accomplished.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 18, 2004, 06:31:13 am
Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 18, 2004, 08:29:58 am
That is what we need is for them 2 to go at it. I don't even know how many WU a day they do.


 On a side note... if I did my math right, I should over take my old nexa1 (#63) spot before June. Does that sound right?
I am thinking that 2 of the P3 are crunching a unit every 9 hours and the 3rd id crunching one every 13 hours. My P4 2.6 does a unit every 3 hrs 40 min.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 18, 2004, 08:43:56 am
Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: DreadlordGW on April 18, 2004, 09:10:57 am
Quote:

Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  




Cyber moved on to BOINC
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 18, 2004, 02:00:58 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Not only that, but he might overtake Raven fer top spot...  




Considering that his last work unit was processed on Wed Dec 10  2003, that is not likely to happen again anytime soon.  




Oops
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: The Postman on April 18, 2004, 06:43:31 pm
BOINC is running? When are we supposed to switch over?  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 18, 2004, 09:19:31 pm
Quote:

BOINC is running? When are we supposed to switch over?  




Still in testing.  No date for the switch.  

 
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Erik Bethke on April 19, 2004, 12:02:19 pm
Wow that is totally awesome guys!!!!

We are in the top 100 in the world.  That is a truly amazing accomplishement.

Really could anyone here imagine it?  Top 100.

okay so for what are we doing in Korea.  This is to be considered confidential and not released to the public, just for you SETI guys...

I am leading a all Korean team plus one American - Nate Simpson from CA to create a new massively multiplayer game based on the kung-fu literature of China.  This is a huge body of fiction going back a thousand years and lead in the modern era by Louis Cha.

If you take a look at my website  www.erikbethke.com  you will find some book reviews there.  Take a look at the Deer and the Cauldron.

It is great working here in Korea, the atmosphere is differently paced, weather interesting and the people are cool.

The three areas of principle focus for our new game are:
Robust dynamic gameplay systems to reduce the reliance on static content
Very deep service
Advanced utilization of social network graphs for extremely neat tricks to have the server aware of the players' experience and adjust the gameplay on the fly to make it more of a partyl!

also as we said earlier B9 is on hold - more practically we and MJ have decided that we need some space.  I will leave it at that for now...

Awesome guys!
-Erik
   
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: GE-Raven on April 19, 2004, 03:02:57 pm
You are and continue to be... "The Best"  Erik.

Thanks for the bone.  

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Age on April 19, 2004, 06:13:44 pm
   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 19, 2004, 08:46:54 pm
Quote:

   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  




Link to team stats

Link to SETI @ Home home page  

Click the links for the information.  Then you don't have to believe anyone.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 20, 2004, 02:43:53 am

  I think of the SETI team as our own little group, in the Taldren family, working on a common goal together  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: ActiveX on April 20, 2004, 06:19:55 am
Its not a typical Korean MMORPG is it?
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: nexa1 on April 21, 2004, 08:55:58 am
 Well, I should take #78 in about 12 hours and #77 by this weekend.
79) nexa1   231 1041 hr 05 min 4 hr 30 min 24.8 sec Wed Apr 21 13:50:18 2004 United States

 Man my times sure went up with these P3 being added
Title: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: Dragon93 on April 29, 2004, 06:52:19 pm
I'm still alive. Still crunching WUs...

Just Crazy busy to the point that forum participation is among my absolute lowest priorities.

Anyway, just wanted to drop in and say Hi to let everyone know I haven't been lost in space or anything of the sort.

Good to see all the old familiar names, etc. I'll check in again in a few months...  
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on April 29, 2004, 07:19:54 pm
Quote:

I'm still alive. Still crunching WUs...

Just Crazy busy to the point that forum participation is among my absolute lowest priorities.

Anyway, just wanted to drop in and say Hi to let everyone know I haven't been lost in space or anything of the sort.

Good to see all the old familiar names, etc. I'll check in again in a few months...  




I have been watching you .  You seem to oscillate between 5000 and 5200 ahead of me.   I can't get closer than 5000 and you can't seem to pull ahead by more than 5200.  Unless you change things that will hold until sometime in May when I give away one of my computers and lose ~20% of my output .  Keep on pushing them out.    
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: Dragon93 on April 29, 2004, 07:24:21 pm
Quote:

I have been watching you .




Oh you have, have you?

I barely have time to even think about it much these days. My job wasn't keeping me busy enough so I started organizing a large music festival for next year and I am about to take on a few consulting gigs on the side.

Sleep is also a low priority for me...
Title: Re: Hello from the SETI Teams Lost One...
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 01, 2004, 01:24:42 pm
Quote:

Sleep is also a low priority for me...  




Sounds very familiar.  

I have achieved 2 more goals.  Top 7500 and 99.85%.  Next goals top 5000 and 99.875%.  (Even .001% gains are hard for me now)

Your rank out of 4978530 total users is:    7490th place.

You have completed more work units than    99.850% of our users.  
Title: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 07, 2004, 10:21:02 am
Is anybody else having problems loading the team page or your individual page?  I am getting 500 errors on both and I have no idea if all of my machines are running.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: nexa1 on May 07, 2004, 02:17:06 pm

 Yeah for some reason for me it takes 3-4 times trying to load to actually get it. Don't know why tho.
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: AJTK on May 10, 2004, 06:41:13 pm
Although I will never get anywhere close to you boys with hardware like Dragon and Nemesis, I have added a P4-2.8 laptop to my inventory and it cranks out one wu about every 4-6 hours, not sure why there is such a large variation. Anyhow, I have FINALLY gotten myself away from the dirt eater on the list and am making progress at moving ahead of some of the mid level peeps who no longer are putting out new units.

Hoping to build a new P4-3.06/800mhz desktop in the near future, so that will also help my unit speed greatly if I can scrape the cash together. Wow, Taldren in the top 100 in the WORLD?!

Are we Trek geeks commited, or what? ROFL!

Oh yeah, Im still alive it would appear. Divorces suck.

Have a nice day!
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 10, 2004, 06:55:42 pm
Quote:

Although I will never get anywhere close to you boys with hardware like Dragon and Nemesis, I have added a P4-2.8 laptop to my inventory and it cranks out one wu about every 4-6 hours, not sure why there is such a large variation. Anyhow, I have FINALLY gotten myself away from the dirt eater on the list and am making progress at moving ahead of some of the mid level peeps who no longer are putting out new units.

Hoping to build a new P4-3.06/800mhz desktop in the near future, so that will also help my unit speed greatly if I can scrape the cash together. Wow, Taldren in the top 100 in the WORLD?!

Are we Trek geeks commited, or what? ROFL!

Oh yeah, Im still alive it would appear. Divorces suck.

Have a nice day!  




Are the P4s hyperthreading enabled?  (and is you OS as well?)  If so using the CLI you can run two copies at once and increase your total output (how much I can't say, but some people claim very substantial boosts).  In any case using the CLI compared to the screen saver is a minimum 10% boost, but you've probably heard that berfore (and are possibly using the CLI ).

I never anticipated getting in the top 10 when I joined.  Being in the upper half of Taldren was all I expected.  Doing 10,000 WUs seemed like a fantasy not reality.  But things happen and next thing  you know you are a contender.  All I can say is that  The Great Moo Hunt!  got out of control.  

 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: AJTK on May 10, 2004, 11:03:28 pm
using the CLI (at your instruction, lol) on the ol p3-750, using screen saver only on laptop at the moment. i need to dload the CLI and set it up again. I THINK this laptop is HT, but I am not positive. If I had to guess, I think it is, but Id have to look in the documentation to be sure. a 2.8, i think it has to be, doesnt it? 2.8 was next to last 533mhz, then the 3.0 went from 533 to 800 and they made others that were 800 that were slower. I am sure this is a 533 board tho. hmmm,  tried to find info on the motherboard/chipset in system, to no avail. OFW, its a 2.8, thats good enough for now, rofl. the cli runs faster on my 750, so it sure as hell will run faster on this thing, lol. Id appreciate if you would post the instrucitons on how to set up the cli again, and i will install it monyana.

Have a nice day!
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 11, 2004, 06:44:05 pm
Quote:

 Id appreciate if you would post the instrucitons on how to set up the cli again, and i will install it monyana.

Have a nice day!
   




There is a stickied thread with the instructions.  But here is a link to make it easier.  There is also a link in my signature.

Keep pumping them out.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: digi on May 12, 2004, 03:21:14 am
Quote:

Is anybody else having problems loading the team page or your individual page?  I am getting 500 errors on both and I have no idea if all of my machines are running.  




Same here.....The one I use which seems to keep completly uptodate with any new units posted is dead.  Anyone got an uptodate link that works?
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 12, 2004, 03:42:16 am
The links do seem to be having trouble.

They seem to have partially revised the links without posting much info about it.  This link is working better for me.  It is far from perfect but is better.  It also seems to be dependent somewhat on the time of day. Team page

Code:
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu



Note the addition of the 2 compared to older links that you may be using.    
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: digi on May 12, 2004, 04:08:17 am
It doesn't appear to be working for me right now, but I'll keep giving it a try.  Thanks Nem.
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 12, 2004, 05:10:28 am
No that link does not work. I also can't check my stats on the individual page either. The only page that I can get is the once a day team page.  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: GE-Raven on May 12, 2004, 04:24:36 pm
You should soon notice an upswing in production.  I expect to be at about double in a day or so.  I hope to eclipse 1K WU per day at some point this summer.

GE-Raven
 
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: The Postman on May 12, 2004, 04:59:53 pm
Quote:

You should soon notice an upswing in production.  I expect to be at about double in a day or so.  I hope to eclipse 1K WU per day at some point this summer.

GE-Raven
   




There goes my chance for catching you  
Title: Re: page loading problem
Post by: ActiveX on May 13, 2004, 08:02:08 am
My WUs have dropped a lot since I've been playing Eve...

But I hope to add an 8 Opteron (dual core) powerhouse to my arsenal...
Title: Re: page loading problem:OUTAGE NOTICE:
Post by: The Postman on May 13, 2004, 01:47:58 pm
 
Quote:

 May 12, 2004
OUTAGE NOTICE: On Monday, May 17th we are going to have a two-hour web site outage starting at 17:00 UTC. Client downloads, statistical pages, etc. will be off-line during this time.
 


 
Title: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 16, 2004, 06:17:41 pm
Go to the following link scroll down to #48 in the USA and you will see our very own:

48) Raven     275878     163.049 years    5 hr 10 min 38.3 sec    Sun May 16 00:49:35 2004    United States
 
Way down at #639 but still among the top 1000 in the U.S.:

639) ICE Gambler     52150     44.339 years    7 hr 26 min 52.4 sec    Sat May 15 08:42:16 2004    United States

If you go to this link instead you will see him at #113 in the WORLD:

113) Raven     275480     162.829 years    5 hr 10 min 40.0 sec    Fri May 14 16:44:36 2004    United States

Much lower down but still in the top 200 is Putanginamao (aka Cyberkada/Carlosbott)

196) Putanginamo    201013     98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines

When I noticed these I could not resist giving you guys a little pat on the back (please ignore the kickme signs left behind ).  Way to go guys. You are the big boys that drag the team up into being among the best in the world.     None of the rest of us make the top 1000 in the world.  No one else makes the top 1000 in the U.S. (or would if they were American.)  
Title: Re: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: DreadlordGW on May 17, 2004, 12:07:49 am
If i still had use to our computer farms i'd be right up around Gambler - but cant run it as Seti slowed critical app down.
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: Age on May 22, 2004, 03:56:16 am
Quote:

Quote:

   What is the Seti Thread about anyway ?I don't want to read through the hole now please tell me.It definetly does not deal with Search for Exterestrial Intelligience no way.I know you are in a lot Sirgod or Ann plase tell me.I don't trust anybody else to be taken seriously so plase tell me.
  Thanks  




Link to team stats

Link to SETI @ Home home page  

Click the links for the information.  Then you don't have to believe anyone.  


I guess I was wrong and sorry to everyone in the Seti team and for clearing this up for me Nemesis.It really is the search for ET.I have been more into Astonomy and looking at the stars.What is required to do a seti search?I thought it had something to do with the game.  
Title: Re: WUs acquired from Cyberkada/Carlosbott.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 09:09:17 am
Quote:

I guess I was wrong and sorry to everyone in the Seti team and for clearing this up for me Nemesis.It really is the search for ET.I have been more into Astonomy and looking at the stars.What is required to do a seti search?I thought it had something to do with the game.  




Go to this thread it walks you through setting up the Seti command line client with the SETIDriver program to control uploads and downloads.  
Title: Re: Back patting and Kickme signs :)
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 09:34:04 am
Quote:

If i still had use to our computer farms i'd be right up around Gambler - but cant run it as Seti slowed critical app down.  




In our team's history you have a unique place.  

The statistics that you kept for so long encouraged people to work hard to keep up their averages.  Others made efforts to output more just to qualify for your stats list.  Your stats listing can probably be credited with causing 10's of thousands of WUS to be output for the team.  

Likely the output the you "provoked" with your statistics is greater than your own personal stats.   Your contribution is far greater than the measured stats.    
Title: A link from the birth of SETI @ Home
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 22, 2004, 10:34:21 am
Link to story

Limited and edited quote below.
Quote:


The average Intel box takes an average of 35 hours to analyse each chunk of data, ...

the PowerPC which handles the Dalek data in a mere 23 hours, ...

SunSPARC which analyses the alien artefacts in just 16 Earth hours. ...

Alphas (from the dead planet Digitalia) take a mere ten galactic time units...

PA Risc systems have been sent more than 3000 batches of data, none of which have returned. ...

RS/6000s (lots of them in use in semi-detached houses in the Neasden area, no doubt) have been sent 4000 bundles of alien transmissions, but none have come back. ...

MIPS processors have gobbled up over 10,000 sets of data to no discernable effect...

680x0-based system has also failed to calculate anything....

an 'unknown' CPU which has received one load of data to which there has been no reply.


 
Title: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 24, 2004, 11:08:16 pm
Your rank out of 5006181 total users is:    7192nd place

and almost 5 million are behind me.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 29, 2004, 08:18:43 am
Brag, Brag, Brag!  

I may only have one lil 2.8 laptop now, but it pumps one out about every 4-6 hours, causing my avg wu per day to go up about 5% in a month, and has dropped my average time approx 20 minutes in that same month. I wonder if I should have my old 733 STOP doing wu's, as it actually hurts my averages? It takes anywhere from 11 (RARE) to 30 (not quite as rare) hours to turn one out, with the avg being around 19 or so. It is amazing how much faster a new pc will churn these things out. Ive done almost a hundred units in the last month. Of course, I saw where Raven said he was gonna top 1 THOUSAND a freaking DAY later this summer, but for this mere mortal, 100 a month is pretty good, lol!

BTW, Raven is at #46 on the home users list now! Congrats.

Have a nice day!    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 29, 2004, 11:08:32 am
Quote:

Brag, Brag, Brag!  

I may only have one lil 2.8 laptop now, but it pumps one out about every 4-6 hours, causing my avg wu per day to go up about 5% in a month, and has dropped my average time approx 20 minutes in that same month.




Unless that is a Celeron laptop or you are using the screensaver it should be faster than that.  I would expect under 3 hours for a P4 (non celeron).  A well configured screen saver should add no more than 20% to that number.  

If you are using the screensaver minimize the time displaying the graphics, they take about 90% of the processing time when running.

A 2.8 P4 COULD have hyperthreading, which while it would hurt your average time should improve your daily output.

Quote:

I wonder if I should have my old 733 STOP doing wu's, as it actually hurts my averages? It takes anywhere from 11 (RARE) to 30 (not quite as rare) hours to turn one out, with the avg being around 19 or so. It is amazing how much faster a new pc will churn these things out.




It depends, are you after good looking stats or are you trying to help the SETI @ Home project or our SETI team?  If you are after helping the project (and team) then the maximum output is of primary importance and you should keep the old machine running.

The old 733 is it a PIII?  It should be able to do better than that.  My mothers PII 350 mhz (which I will soon swap for my #4 machine, upgrading her to an Athlon XP 2400+ and hurting my average time and output) averages about 16 hours / WU when I can run it.  Your 733 should be able to do it in 8 hours, even a Celeron should manage 9-10 hours.

Less than 24 hours ago I replaced the Athlon XP 2100+ in my #3 machine with a Athlon XP 3200+, according to SETIQueue that machine has already improved its average (calculated over 14 days) by 4 minutes and seems to be dropping my historical average by about 4 seconds a day.  My early estimate is that it will be doing ~ 2 hrs 10 minutes / WU on average.  That should drive my output up to 45-46 WUs/day total.  My #2 machine drags my average time up, but I wouldn't think of stopping it (upgrade the dual Athlon XP 2100+ to Athlon MP 2800+ yes, stop it no ).  The PII will drag my average time up when I trade my mother but I will be running it until I give it away sometime this summer.  Then I will be down to 3 machines and maybe 38 WUs/ day output.

Quote:

Ive done almost a hundred units in the last month. Of course, I saw where Raven said he was gonna top 1 THOUSAND a freaking DAY later this summer, but for this mere mortal, 100 a month is pretty good, lol!




Every WU counts.  Whether you do 1 a month or a 1000 a day it counts and helps both SETI @ Home and the team.  

Quote:

BTW, Raven is at #46 on the home users list now! Congrats.

Have a nice day!    




Cheating Bostich , he should be on the business users list.  Most of his WUs come from business machines not his home machines.  

Almost all of mine were generated by my own machines ( a few came from my mothers machine, which I gave her, and a few from a friends home/small business machines).  But I don't (and won't) make the top 1000 home users list.

I am #286 in Canada

286) IKV Nemesis     19528     8.207 years    3 hr 40 min 54.2 sec    Sat May 29 00:40:55 2004    Canada

and # 6 in Ontario

6) IKV Nemesis     19532     8.209 years    3 hr 40 min 54.0 sec    Sat May 29 02:49:41 2004    Canada      

As far as our team is concerned, I used to be at #5.  The best I can reasonably hope to do (unless we lose a higher ranked member, which I don't want to happen) is to maintain myself at 6th place.  If another business user shows up (like everyone above me) I could easily be knocked down the list, even out of the top 10.  But anyone who wants my spot is going to have to work for it .  If they can take it good for them and the team.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 30, 2004, 07:46:51 am
Well, here is the deal. The 733 uses XP Pro, so I have the client running on it, BUT, I also have seti as the screensaver, as it appears that other screensavers have to fight with the seti client for cpu cycles. (The starfield looks like the Enterprise is running out of gas, it stutters) I have the screensaver only stay up for one minute then go blank... Not sure why the time is less than what you think it should be, this is actually a 750, not a 733, but it is a 750 on a 100mhz clock, not 133. Perhaps that is the reason?

The laptop is running XP HOME, so you said I cant run the client. Perhaps that is the reason for the time lag?

Your right of course, the overall seti output SHOULD be the goal, shouldnt it?

Have a nice day!  
 
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on May 30, 2004, 09:02:26 am
Quote:

Well, here is the deal. The 733 uses XP Pro, so I have the client running on it, BUT, I also have seti as the screensaver, as it appears that other screensavers have to fight with the seti client for cpu cycles. (The starfield looks like the Enterprise is running out of gas, it stutters) I have the screensaver only stay up for one minute then go blank... Not sure why the time is less than what you think it should be, this is actually a 750, not a 733, but it is a 750 on a 100mhz clock, not 133. Perhaps that is the reason?




A PIII at 750mhz and 100 FSB should (according to SETISpy) output a workunit in 7hrs 50 minutes.  How much memory do you have on it?  I don't use XP Pro but someone who does may be able to say if you are being memory limited.

As I understand this you are using both the CLI and the screensaver?  That would naturally drive up the time.  Instead of using a screensaver use the energy saving option to turn off the monitor after an inactive time.  

Running both will not only make them take twice as long BUT will introduce OS overhead that makes them take even longer, especially if you are low on memory.

Quote:

The laptop is running XP HOME, so you said I cant run the client. Perhaps that is the reason for the time lag?




As far as I know the CLI should run on XP Home.  I have never tried it myself (I don't have XP Home or Pro).  If I said anything that led you to believe otherwise it was an error.

Quote:

Your right of course, the overall seti output SHOULD be the goal, shouldnt it?

Have a nice day!    




It is for me.  For those who want to keep their stats fast they can always create a new account to donate the output of slow running computers.  That way they get what they want while maintaining maximum output for SETI.  Everyone wins, no one loses.

The race for rank is merely a fun add on.  The competition between moofighters and myself way back when he passed me the first time entertained both of us and others who read the postings between us.  The Great Moo Hunt later did the same.  Unfortunately that ended a year ago when the moohunt ended .    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on May 30, 2004, 05:01:40 pm
Maybe that is my problem, using the client and screensaver. I will try it without. But that really does not account for the fact that even with running both, the screensaver version still sometimes gets one out as fast as 11 hours. Usually alot longer tho. Ill turn screeny off, see what gives. The 750 has 576 megs of ram, with almost nothing running other than all the XP Pro processes that say that blue bolts from the heavens will strike you head if you dare to turn them off.

Thanks for the info Nemesis. Ill keep plugging away. Im not really worried about stats, I obviously cant get very high up the list, lol. I just wanna be respectable! ALOT of the people in front of me are deadwood, and havent put out units in months/years so it's just a matter of time until I get up to some of you big boys near the top and p00p out.

Have a nice day!  
 
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 03, 2004, 06:08:30 pm
Quote:

I just wanna be respectable!




I call this respectable.

47) AJTK     1008     1.337 years    11 hr 37 min 22.8 sec    Thu Jun 3 20:26:15 2004    United States

Relatively few reach 4 figures OR a year of computer time.  Well done on both counts.

Quote:

I obviously cant get very high up the list, lol.




Sound like me back in the beginning.  I was told that as a home user the best I could hope for was the top 20 on the team, top 10 was impossible.  I don't understand that word impossible.  

Keep trying and just perhaps you will find the time comes that you are the big guy.  Improbable, perhaps.  Not impossible.    
Title: Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
Post by: AJTK on June 03, 2004, 08:53:03 pm
lol, i dont think i will be cranking out 1K wu's per DAY anytime soon, rofl! but, im hoping to build a new desktop sometime this year. either with a top o the line hyperlthreading enabled p4 or perhaps an athalon fx64

yeah, over 1000! FINALLY! and my time is still going down down down

HAND!  
 
Title: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 06, 2004, 10:24:43 pm
5) Dragon93     25000     33.455 years    11 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Mon Jun 7 02:58:25 2004    United States  

Now lets see you get the 50,000 certificate.

 
Title: Re: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
Post by: Dragon93 on June 09, 2004, 07:05:35 pm
That's gonna be a while there buddy.

Unless I can commandeer some more machines...
Title: server troubles
Post by: The Postman on June 17, 2004, 11:03:24 am
Does anybody know what is going on with the data server? Is this a bandwidth problem on their end? They seem hard pressed to get it to run 48 hours without problems.  I can't keep my "service" machines running if they can't keep the server up. As it is I haven't been able to transmit for 2 days on my home machines.  
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: IKV Nemesis D7L on June 19, 2004, 09:32:25 am
June 17, 2004
We are working on fixing the network problems that are resulting in dropped connections to the data server.

June 18, 2004
The campus network folks did some great troubleshooting and narrowed down the problem to a faulty link on the path to our ISP. Repairs have been called in.

I've had trouble sending in but since I use SETIQueue I haven't missed a WU.    
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: The Postman on June 19, 2004, 03:41:13 pm
I have been following their troubles since they began posting. My problem is that I have 3 machines that I can't run any caching on. Everytime the server crashes on their end and one of these 3 machines tries to transmit and can't, it stops running until I can reboot it. I lose more than half of my capacity when those machines don't run.  In the meantime I have enlarged my cache by 1 day for the rest of my machines.  
Title: Re: server troubles
Post by: Nemesis on June 26, 2004, 09:11:25 am
bump
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 26, 2004, 10:09:10 am
which thread are we going to use?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 26, 2004, 09:44:47 pm
:notworthy:

Congratulations to Raven for breaking 300,000 WORK UNITS
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 29, 2004, 10:58:10 am
Bump
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on June 30, 2004, 12:56:05 pm
Well I have been testing BOINC and I have yet to get a work unit...

Pretty slick... LOL

GE-Raven
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Gambler on June 30, 2004, 12:57:44 pm
Well I have been testing BOINC and I have yet to get a work unit...

Pretty slick... LOL

GE-Raven


That's bad.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 30, 2004, 01:25:10 pm
Well I have been testing BOINC and I have yet to get a work unit...

Pretty slick... LOL

GE-Raven


They are trying to run 2 projects with the resources of one.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on July 13, 2004, 04:44:07 pm
Well, I have now reached several of my goals that I hoped to make  before the part1 ended. I have exceeded 7500 and am now in the top 30,000.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Age on July 13, 2004, 05:10:44 pm
 I guess this means the Taldren Seti team is in full swing still.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on July 18, 2004, 07:22:41 pm
Seti has been down since 08:30 UTC this morning. you can receive but not upload results. No official news yet.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on July 18, 2004, 10:45:37 pm
Seti has been down since 08:30 UTC this morning. you can receive but not upload results. No official news yet.

Still no official news BUT ITS WORKINGNOW!

I am in the process of uploading 57 WUs.  (On dialup that takes awhile :) )
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on July 31, 2004, 07:24:58 pm
BUMP from page 5 :spam:  BOINC STILL has bugs and kinks (no surprise there). When they get resolved, I hope all of you will at least try this new version. I do like the way the caching works, I can monitor and run several remote computers from my house through the web based settings.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Byzantine on August 04, 2004, 11:05:24 pm
I am uninformed, can someone enlighten me?  I would like to know the difference in purpose of SETI Thread and SETI Thread Part III?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 05, 2004, 05:49:31 am
I am uninformed, can someone enlighten me?  I would like to know the difference in purpose of SETI Thread and SETI Thread Part III?

This thread is being used by those NOT using BOINC. This thread was the original as you know from the Taldren boards. The other thread was started before the Taldren data base was imported but has now evolved into the Boinc thread.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 12, 2004, 05:00:27 pm
Today I hit 8000 and I am continuing the climb toward 10,000. I still have most of my machines here while BOINC is still going through growing pains. Someday it will be ready for primetime but not yet.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Mazeppa on August 12, 2004, 09:09:43 pm
bump
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on August 13, 2004, 07:37:53 am
bump

Well it is officially the end of the road of my "big production" days.... I will be down to about 50 a day now.  I don't see me being a big producer for BOINC....

It has been fun Gentlemen.

GE-Raven
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 15, 2004, 10:26:27 am
from BOINC News
Quote
August 14, 2004
We encourage everyone to run SETI@home Classic during our server outages. SETI@home Classic makes the same scientific contribution as SETI@home/BOINC.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Mazeppa on August 17, 2004, 07:05:47 pm
bump
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on August 17, 2004, 10:15:09 pm
bump

Well it is officially the end of the road of my "big production" days.... I will be down to about 50 a day now.  I don't see me being a big producer for BOINC....

It has been fun Gentlemen.

GE-Raven

I just took a performance hit myself.  I've been waiting since May for my parents to leave town so I could swap their ancient 350mhz Pentium II machine for a more modern Athlon XP2400+.  That reduces my output from ~45 to ~37 WU's/day.   Down to 3 machines.   

I was slowly gaining on Dragon, I'm not sure if I still will be with the downgrade.  :(
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 21, 2004, 07:23:42 pm
Well, I am down for the weekend. A thunderstorm last night took  the access server offline and it won't be fixed until Mon AM. My 4th machine has been taken offline by my neighbor (it is his machine) and my 2 home machines have full BOINC caches.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 25, 2004, 04:59:01 pm
BUMP for the team    :ufo:  We'll find him yet
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on August 28, 2004, 09:31:32 pm
I just took a performance hit myself.  I've been waiting since May for my parents to leave town so I could swap their ancient 350mhz Pentium II machine for a more modern Athlon XP2400+.  That reduces my output from ~45 to ~37 WU's/day.   Down to 3 machines.   

I was slowly gaining on Dragon, I'm not sure if I still will be with the downgrade.  :(

The friend that I "indefinitely" loaned a computer to a while back has returned it temporarily.  He has been having some troubles with it that I can and will fix (bad or disconnected CPU fan) and won't be able to use it for a while so it goes back on my SETI until he can use it.  It should do 6-7 WUs and restore most of the lost output from giving my mother the XP 2400+. 

I was still gaining on Dragon even with the reduced output, this will increase the rate of closure, not that I expect to catch him before SETI 1 ends.

The increase will likely be next weekend.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 29, 2004, 07:12:10 am
Well, I am down for the weekend. A thunderstorm last night took  the access server offline and it won't be fixed until Mon AM. My 4th machine has been taken offline by my neighbor (it is his machine) and my 2 home machines have full BOINC caches.

Ditto for this weekend as well except my BOINC cache is MT on my P4 so I am crunching classic until the switch
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Mazeppa on September 06, 2004, 12:32:23 pm
Bump
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on September 11, 2004, 08:20:46 am
Bump
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: RazalYllib on September 21, 2004, 06:28:50 pm
I havent really kept up w/ this thread...since a undetermined amount of time.  I just keep crunching WU.  I checked my stat on classic and was much surprised to find me sitting at 19.  I guess numbers shifted on the move to boinc.  Our collective WU total is still respectable though.

Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on September 23, 2004, 07:25:16 pm
I have now passed 10 computer years.   Soon the last certificate 25,000 (I had thought that 10,000 would be the last)

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    24543
Total CPU Time    10.009 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 34 min 21.0 sec
Average results received per day    25.10
Last result returned:   Thu Sep 23 23:28:22 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC
    View Registration Class
SETI@home user for:   2.679 years
Your group info:
You belong to the group named:    Taldren
You are not currently the founder of any teams.
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5184415 total users is:    5967th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.885% of our users.

I will also have to point out to Nasim that my average time/WU is now less than his.  Maybe I can kick him into activity.  :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on October 06, 2004, 04:44:41 am
Just made a new landmark

25,000 Work Units

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    25004
Total CPU Time    10.177 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 33 min 55.8 sec
Average results received per day    25.25
Last result returned:   Wed Oct 6 09:23:23 2004 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC
    View Registration Class
SETI@home user for:   2.713 years
Your group info:
You belong to the group named:    Taldren
You are not currently the founder of any teams.
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5198981 total users is:    5870th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    3
You have completed more work units than    99.887% of our users.
    
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on October 06, 2004, 05:57:39 am
Congratulations  :) :) :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on October 30, 2004, 11:21:24 am
BUMP, for old times sake
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on November 18, 2004, 04:03:38 pm
News about the future of SAH Classic can be found here @ Boinc news:
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/tech_news.php
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Maxillius on November 29, 2004, 10:22:16 pm
Got a question, what in the world does this mean???


(http://H:\Documents and Settings\Rob Dies\Desktop)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Darth Sidious on November 30, 2004, 06:32:57 am
WU disrupted by interference while being recorded.

You'll still get credit for it.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Commander Maxillius on November 30, 2004, 07:58:10 am
oh, I was hoping it had found something interesting and had absolutely no question about it, hence the 3-second processing time
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: RazalYllib on November 30, 2004, 08:19:11 pm
i have one box still on classic and the my box is now on boinc
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 09, 2004, 07:20:57 pm
Today I moved up to the # 13 spot as I quickly overtake #12. I hope to make it to 10,000 before it ends. After I reach 10,000, I hope to totally move to BOINC with the rest of my machines. I hope the rest of you who still visit here will make the switch when classic ends in a few weeks or months. :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 29, 2004, 07:50:57 pm
BUMP
Does anybody still read this?
I "found" a P4 2.26 to push me along thanks to Capt Chaos
This used to be a big thread :(
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 29, 2004, 08:58:54 pm
Yep.  I still watch it.  I keep a window open on our SETI stats at all times.  I am slowly moving up on Dragon.  I doubt that I can catch him before the end but I keep going. 
Title: A personal SETI goal achieved 99.900%
Post by: Nemesis on January 05, 2005, 05:21:17 pm
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    28430

Total CPU Time    11.415 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 31 min 02.2 sec
Average results received per day    26.28
SETI@home user for:   2.964 years

Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5308030 total users is:    5330th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.900% of our users.

Title: My goal reached
Post by: The Postman on January 11, 2005, 06:31:50 pm
Name (and URL)   The Postman   
Results Received   10007
Total CPU Time     5.841 years 
Average CPU Time per work unit   5 hr 06 min 48.6 sec 
Average results received per day   13.56 
Last result returned: Tue Jan 11 23:56:11 2005 UTC
Registered on: Sat Jan 4 22:34:07 2003 UTC
SETI@home user for: 2.022 years
Your rank out of 5314327 total users is:  25682nd place. 
The number of users who have this rank:  8 
You have completed more work units than  99.517% of our users.

Title: Re: My goal reached
Post by: Nemesis on January 11, 2005, 06:50:21 pm
Name (and URL)   The Postman   
Results Received   10007

Good going.  Did you save your certificate?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on January 11, 2005, 08:55:33 pm
Thank You and congratulations to you as well for your recent achievements. I think I have made the last goal for me before Seti Classic ends in a few weeks. I have now saved a copy of all of my certificates (in color) for my records. I will now slowly begin the task of trying to switch over my last  machines to BOINC as time allows.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on January 11, 2005, 09:17:07 pm
I think I have made the last goal for me before Seti Classic ends in a few weeks.

I have said that so many times due to the "imminent" demise of SETI 1 for the last 2 years.  I will worry about it when it happens.  I haven't yet decided about BOINC.  I'll have to look at what changes they have made.  I don't like the way they want to do automatic updates without explicit permission.  I don't let Micrsoft do them and sure as heck will not allow SETI to do so.

You know you can make the image larger as well as colour? 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on January 12, 2005, 05:35:54 am
do they get bigger than size "2"?
Title: HT CPU under W2K?
Post by: The Postman on January 12, 2005, 10:42:50 am
IKV Nemesis, Have you ever built or run an HT CPU under W2K. I have been told I need to go to XP to run HT. Anybody else feel free to jump in on this one.
Title: Re: HT CPU under W2K?
Post by: Nemesis on January 12, 2005, 08:17:56 pm
IKV Nemesis, Have you ever built or run an HT CPU under W2K. I have been told I need to go to XP to run HT. Anybody else feel free to jump in on this one.

My current machines are Athlons, so no I haven't done hyperthreading. 

As I understand it though Windows 2000 Pro will detect a hyperthreading CPU as two processors and run on both. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on February 19, 2005, 04:27:55 pm
Link to site (http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/)

Quote
Einstein@home is a program that uses your computer's idle time to search for spinning neutron stars (also called pulsars) using data from the LIGO and GEO gravitational wave detectors. Einstein@home is a World Year of Physics 2005 project supported by the American Physical Society (APS) and by a number of international organizations.

After several months of testing, we are now 'throwing open the doors' for general participation. If you would like to take part, please use the Create account link to create an account, and follow the instructions. Einstein@home is available for Windows, Linux and MacOS X computers.

This first production run of Einstein@home carries out a search for pulsars over the entire sky, using the most sensitive 600 hours of data from LIGO's third science run, S3.

Bruce Allen, Professor of Physics, U. of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Einstein@home Leader for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration


Feb 19, 2005
Einstein@Home was officially launched this morning at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting in Washington, DC, USA.


Link to rules and policy (http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/info.php)

Uses BOINC (http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 05, 2005, 06:36:06 am
Quote
March 5, 2005 - 01:00 UTC
The project is down for the weekend. Although we made some diagnostic progress, the servers are still not able to talk to the UPS's. The power in the building is still not trustworthy. There will probably be a power outage next week so that campus can track this down
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 06, 2005, 02:31:32 pm
My cache was full so I am still processing away at full speed.  I'll have over 100WUs to upload on monday after work.  I hope everyone else (on both projects) has a full cache to work from as well.  If SETI and BOINC are not back up full time it might take me a couple of days to finish uploading them all (dialup and only after work fo uploads).
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 06, 2005, 07:33:41 pm
I too only have dialup. I have found it very difficult to get anything up or down for BOINC. I did manage to get 2 or 3 days worth for BOINC on most machines with full classic caches when BOINC runs out. I did manage to get driver installed on all but one machine before the weekend started. I expect my evenings will be busy trying to get the machines to transmit in the 2 hours after I get out of work.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 06, 2005, 08:11:11 pm
I too only have dialup. I have found it very difficult to get anything up or down for BOINC. I did manage to get 2 or 3 days worth for BOINC on most machines with full classic caches when BOINC runs out. I did manage to get driver installed on all but one machine before the weekend started. I expect my evenings will be busy trying to get the machines to transmit in the 2 hours after I get out of work.

I might have 3 hours to transfer.  The time depends on workload (we've been running overtime lately) and how direct I choose to come home, usually I take my time and a long walk if the weather permits.

Current estimate ~120 WUs to upload.  I may need a couple of days to catch up in the limited time available for transfer each day.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 08, 2005, 04:29:05 am
I finally take my place in the top 5000.

Name IKV Nemesis
Results Received    30747
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5369885 total users is:    4989th place.
You have completed more work units than    99.907% of our users.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 08, 2005, 09:45:32 am
Congratulations :) :woot:
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 08, 2005, 07:25:42 pm
Congratulations :) :woot:

Naturally they did a renumbering.

Your rank out of 5370823 total users is:    5034th place

So I get to do it all over again.  But I will get there again and stay in the top 5000. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 13, 2005, 12:30:55 pm
Back into the top 5000.

Name IKV Nemesis
Results Received  30980
Your rank out of 5375715 total users is: 4999th place.
You have completed more work units than 99.907% of our users.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 15, 2005, 06:15:49 pm
Quote
March 15, 2005
SETI-BOINC db is down to create some new indices on user and team tables so that more current seti-classic information can be inserted into the boinc table for user and teams. This includes all new users since the last migration from last year and more current scores for users who have not moved to boinc. Service should be restored in about 90 minutes.

Everything I am reading would suggest this is the first step to end classic. They are looking to move the classic resources to Boinc to handle the load.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 15, 2005, 06:52:15 pm
Quote
March 9, 2005
Star Trek is going off the air! Read here how Star Trek Helped Launch SETI@home.

http://planetary.org/star_trek/enterprise_022405.html
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 19, 2005, 12:34:12 pm
Everything I am reading would suggest this is the first step to end classic. They are looking to move the classic resources to Boinc to handle the load.

A recent Admin post in the official SETI Classic forum indicates that Classic has at least a month, possibly much longer.

The servers don't appear to be functional this weekend again.  They also will apparently be down on Tuesday when the attempt is made to diagnose the power problems for the building.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 19, 2005, 06:33:02 pm
http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/~cricket/inr-668-interfaces.html

Quote
March 19, 2005
Our Internet link through Cogent went down at around midnight UTC. It is being looked at with an unknown time to fix.


This affects Classic and Boinc.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 21, 2005, 09:22:42 pm
At least for now, a connection is up for both projects
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 21, 2005, 10:26:37 pm
At least for now, a connection is up for both projects

Thanks, last time I checked it was down.  With 157 WUs to upload on dialup I think that I will just leave it sending when I go to bed, which is right now. 

Night all.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 22, 2005, 10:24:55 am
At least for now, a connection is up for both projects

And it seems to be down again ???
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 22, 2005, 07:20:37 pm
And it seems to be down again ???

Now its up again.

They had plans to take it down today while they attempted to find out what was causing the building power failures.   Hopefully they found the problem and fixed it.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 11, 2005, 05:37:19 pm
3 times I have crunched my way under 24,000 in rank. And 3 times they have adjusted the number by close to 100 an pushed me back over 24,000.  >:(  I think I will forever be stuck over 24,000.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 11, 2005, 08:09:22 pm
3 times I have crunched my way under 24,000 in rank. And 3 times they have adjusted the number by close to 100 an pushed me back over 24,000.  >:(  I think I will forever be stuck over 24,000.

I had the same thing at 5000.  Knocked back 3 times.  The fourth time I kept it.  Keep going you can get over that hump.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 16, 2005, 12:45:17 am
Back into our top 5 - finally.

5) IKV Nemesis     32463     12.888 years    3 hr 28 min 40.0 sec    Sat Apr 16 05:03:23 2005    Canada
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 16, 2005, 12:08:10 pm
3 times I have crunched my way under 24,000 in rank. And 3 times they have adjusted the number by close to 100 an pushed me back over 24,000.  >:(  I think I will forever be stuck over 24,000.

Last night when I went to bed I was at 23,917 and when I woke up this morning, I was at 24,017.

AAARRRGGGHHHH :'(
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 17, 2005, 10:58:31 pm
Last night when I went to bed I was at 23,917 and when I woke up this morning, I was at 24,017.

AAARRRGGGHHHH :'(

I just reached 4800th place.  What is the chance that a recalculation will occur and push me back again?  100%?

Your rank out of 5401679 total users is:    4800th place.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 19, 2005, 08:44:13 pm
It has been a long time since a team list wast posted and since I gained another rank it is time for that posting. 

 :dance:

1) Raven     322456     188.640 years    5 hr 07 min 28.8 sec    Tue Apr 19 19:00:14 2005    United States
2) Putanginamo    201013    98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines
3) ICE Gambler     74312    59.877 years    7 hr 03 min 30.3 sec    Tue Apr 19 07:13:18 2005    United States
4) IKV Nemesis     32626    12.949 years    3 hr 28 min 36.7 sec    Wed Apr 20 01:03:02 2005    Canada
5) Phillip Showel     32616    28.338 years    7 hr 36 min 39.6 sec    Tue Apr 19 20:02:38 2005    United States
6) Dragon93     32455    42.524 years    11 hr 28 min 39.5 sec    Wed Mar 2 20:47:53 2005    United States
7) Max Peck     19827    10.296 years    4 hr 32 min 55.7 sec    Wed Apr 20 00:48:56 2005    Canada
8 ) Kenneth Yeast     12174    8.733 years    6 hr 17 min 02.2 sec    Fri Apr 15 01:34:48 2005    United States
9) Noah Wallace III User Profile    12060    9.224 years    6 hr 42 min 00.7 sec    Fri Mar 4 22:21:28 2005    United States
10) KD4     11857    6.003 years    4 hr 26 min 06.7 sec    Fri Aug 6 06:29:47 2004    United States
11) ChAotiCIllusion     11074    4.068 years    3 hr 13 min 05.4 sec    Fri Mar 4 23:44:49 2005    United Kingdom
12) The Postman     11061    6.364 years    5 hr 02 min 25.5 sec    Tue Apr 19 22:40:38 2005    United States
13) KBF Mazeppa     9708    12.031 years    10 hr 51 min 21.8 sec    Tue Apr 19 21:58:13 2005    United States
14) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
15) Nasim    7500    3.078 years    3 hr 35 min 41.8 sec    Tue Feb 15 01:17:01 2005    Canada
16) Intrepid-XC     6788    5.941 years    7 hr 40 min 01.3 sec    Wed Apr 20 00:59:10 2005    United States
17) KBF-Dogmatix  User Profile    5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
18) RazalYllib     5513    5.256 years    8 hr 21 min 07.9 sec    Wed Apr 13 16:40:00 2005    United States
19) Sven Forkbeard     5131    7.445 years    12 hr 42 min 40.2 sec    Mon Aug 30 01:20:49 2004    United States
20) lapt    5038    2.691 years    4 hr 40 min 44.9 sec    Wed Apr 20 01:17:10 2005    United States
21) SGM RAS     4905    7.879 years    14 hr 04 min 14.3 sec    Tue Apr 19 18:06:31 2005    United States
22) Fahrenheit User Profile    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
23) digi    4509    1.916 years    3 hr 43 min 23.4 sec    Mon Jun 14 06:45:05 2004    United Kingdom
24) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
25) Ronbo     4306    3.327 years    6 hr 46 min 06.3 sec    Tue Mar 15 03:03:10 2005    United States
26) Bill Castner     4268    2.706 years    5 hr 33 min 12.0 sec    Mon Aug 23 22:29:39 2004    United States
27) Jim     3738    2.933 years    6 hr 52 min 21.5 sec    Tue Apr 19 20:28:56 2005    United States
28) RedHotChiliDog    3738    1.635 years    3 hr 49 min 54.8 sec    Tue Oct 19 02:47:48 2004    United States
29) f9TH SIR X     3553    2.738 years    6 hr 45 min 05.2 sec    Sun Jul 4 00:46:20 2004    New Zealand
30) hobbesmaster     3489    1.961 years    4 hr 55 min 20.3 sec    Thu Dec 16 19:05:31 2004    United States
31) Hollis J. Wood    3245    2.959 years    7 hr 59 min 15.9 sec    Wed Apr 20 00:18:09 2005    Canada
32) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
33) BobGraham     2755    1.784 years    5 hr 40 min 26.8 sec    Tue Apr 19 17:01:38 2005    United States
34) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
35) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
36) Reffet     2128    1.602 years    6 hr 35 min 44.7 sec    Tue Mar 23 00:51:11 2004    United States
37) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
38) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
39) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
40) Xeir     1709    2.856 years    14 hr 38 min 16.1 sec    Tue Apr 19 00:47:13 2005    United States
41) Malystryx_XC     1437    1.613 years    9 hr 50 min 02.0 sec    Sat May 1 19:54:43 2004    United States
42) Iceman     1355    1.264 years    8 hr 10 min 23.4 sec    Tue Apr 19 22:00:09 2005    United States
43) AJTK     1317    1.540 years    10 hr 14 min 29.1 sec    Wed Sep 22 09:19:01 2004    United States
44) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
45) Kroma BaSyl User Profile    1152    5610 hr 42 min    4 hr 52 min 13.4 sec    Sat Oct 23 15:46:20 2004    United States
46) davezzzz    1045    1.372 years    11 hr 30 min 00.9 sec    Thu Mar 3 23:22:25 2005    United States
47) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
48) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
49) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
50) Daniel     904    1.545 years    14 hr 58 min 01.9 sec    Tue Apr 19 17:14:47 2005    United States
51) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
52) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
53) Rick Regan     722    5502 hr 27 min    7 hr 37 min 16.0 sec    Tue Apr 5 13:41:36 2005    United States
54) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
55) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
56) Harlequin     622    4646 hr 27 min    7 hr 28 min 12.7 sec    Thu Aug 5 13:38:10 2004    United Kingdom
57) thirdleg     602    2763 hr 41 min    4 hr 35 min 27.0 sec    Mon Apr 5 03:36:56 2004    United States
58) TAG-Draco     600    6191 hr 32 min    10 hr 19 min 09.2 sec    Wed Apr 20 00:54:33 2005    United States
59) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
60) TalonClaw     587    1.477 years    22 hr 02 min 08.6 sec    Mon Oct 11 20:58:03 2004    United States
61) Matsukasi     586    1.258 years    18 hr 48 min 25.3 sec    Sun Feb 27 21:12:23 2005    United States
62) Toasty0 User Profile    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
63) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids  User Profile    546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
64) ActiveX     515    2114 hr 00 min    4 hr 06 min 17.4 sec    Fri Aug 27 22:30:06 2004    United States
65) Captain_Krenn     509    6539 hr 08 min    12 hr 50 min 49.3 sec    Wed Jun 23 19:30:59 2004    United States
66) Speaker to Aliens  User Profile    501    8462 hr 56 min    16 hr 53 min 31.5 sec    Fri Sep 3 19:43:07 2004    United Kingdom
67) nexa1     479    2457 hr 31 min    5 hr 07 min 49.9 sec    Tue Jun 22 11:47:33 2004    United States
68) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
69) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
70) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
71) Towelie     408    4327 hr 50 min    10 hr 36 min 26.8 sec    Sat Jul 24 18:00:06 2004    United States
72) Tanked_Up     402    4984 hr 56 min    12 hr 24 min 01.3 sec    Sat Jul 3 10:42:43 2004    United Kingdom
73) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
74) Grimklink     339    1.265 years    32 hr 40 min 37.6 sec    Fri Jan 7 00:19:36 2005    United States
75) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
76) SPQR Kremen     317    1909 hr 32 min    6 hr 01 min 25.6 sec    Thu Jul 15 12:13:12 2004    Australia
77) Lancer of TAC     312    4683 hr 08 min    15 hr 00 min 36.2 sec    Fri Mar 26 18:26:57 2004    United States
78) Spectre  User Profile    295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
79) awm3     288    2515 hr 47 min    8 hr 44 min 07.3 sec    Sat Mar 27 03:26:17 2004    Canada
80) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
81) Chrisr118     257    1247 hr 54 min    4 hr 51 min 20.4 sec    Fri Oct 22 19:06:11 2004    Canada
82) Otenki     250    1407 hr 00 min    5 hr 37 min 40.9 sec    Wed Mar 2 00:05:56 2005    Canada
83) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
84) keravnos     233    2873 hr 10 min    12 hr 19 min 52.2 sec    Sun Jan 2 16:06:45 2005    Greece
85) Rob     197    2879 hr 16 min    14 hr 36 min 56.0 sec    Tue Apr 19 17:37:16 2005    United States
86) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
87) Tus  User Profile    186    1484 hr 18 min    7 hr 58 min 48.4 sec    Fri Jun 25 23:31:49 2004    United States
88) jimmythehat    184    1944 hr 56 min    10 hr 34 min 13.3 sec    Tue May 11 12:30:17 2004    United States
89) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
90) Max     179    2800 hr 23 min    15 hr 38 min 40.5 sec    Fri Apr 30 12:03:32 2004    United Kingdom
91) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
92) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
93) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
94) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
95) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
96) Lairis     150    1618 hr 06 min    10 hr 47 min 14.4 sec    Wed Nov 24 20:05:51 2004    United States
97) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
98) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
99) clintk     123    1184 hr 13 min    9 hr 37 min 40.2 sec    Sun Oct 24 10:23:02 2004    United Kingdom
100) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
101) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
102) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
103) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
104) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
105) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
106) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
107) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
108) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
109) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
110) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
111) Sakrot  User Profile    71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
112) F9thTheJudge     70    2762 hr 30 min    39 hr 27 min 51.9 sec    Mon Mar 7 17:51:48 2005    United States
113) Cross     65    202 hr 22 min    3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec    Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004    United States
114) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
115) Apocolypse  User Profile    52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
116) GreenLantern User Profile    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
117) sirgod  User Profile    48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
118) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
119) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
120) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
121) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
122) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
123) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
124) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
125) Hilton     29    812 hr 16 min    28 hr 00 min 33.5 sec    Sat Jun 19 04:46:04 2004    United States
126) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
127) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
128) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
129) SlackerJoe     25    148 hr 18 min    5 hr 55 min 56.1 sec    Thu Jun 24 04:48:31 2004    United States
130) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
131)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
132) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
133) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
134) SFCSpoonman  User Profile    16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
135) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
136) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
137) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
138) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
139) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
140) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
141) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
142) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
143) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
144) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
145) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
146) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
147) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
148) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
149) FRA_C_Blade_XC  User Profile    4    31 hr 48 min    7 hr 57 min 01.0 sec    Fri Mar 19 03:22:30 2004    United States
150) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
151) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
152) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
153) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
154) Beanardo  User Profile    2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
155) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
156) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
157) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
158) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
159) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
160) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States

I can foresee no possible way for me to pass Gambler so this is as high as I can progress.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Darth Sidious on April 19, 2005, 09:18:17 pm
Congratulations!

Was a LONG chase to catch me :)

It has been a long time since a team list wast posted and since I gained another rank it is time for that posting. 

 :dance:

1) Raven     322456     188.640 years    5 hr 07 min 28.8 sec    Tue Apr 19 19:00:14 2005    United States
2) Putanginamo    201013    98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines
3) ICE Gambler     74312    59.877 years    7 hr 03 min 30.3 sec    Tue Apr 19 07:13:18 2005    United States
4) IKV Nemesis     32626    12.949 years    3 hr 28 min 36.7 sec    Wed Apr 20 01:03:02 2005    Canada
5) Phillip Showel     32616    28.338 years    7 hr 36 min 39.6 sec    Tue Apr 19 20:02:38 2005    United States
6) Dragon93     32455    42.524 years    11 hr 28 min 39.5 sec    Wed Mar 2 20:47:53 2005    United States

Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 20, 2005, 05:23:23 pm
Congratulations!

Was a LONG chase to catch me :)

Three years 4 months less a day.  I am persistant.  :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 28, 2005, 06:24:10 pm
Was classic supposed to go down today?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 28, 2005, 08:22:45 pm
Was classic supposed to go down today?

Quote
April 27, 2005
We will be having a general outage tomorrow to do a database backup and to reinitialize our replica database server. The replica became corrupt last week due to a disk space issue. After this is done, we should not have to have outages for backups. We will start at 17:00 UTC. The outage will last several hours.

It is back up now.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 29, 2005, 05:18:43 am
Was classic supposed to go down today?

Quote
April 27, 2005
We will be having a general outage tomorrow to do a database backup and to reinitialize our replica database server. The replica became corrupt last week due to a disk space issue. After this is done, we should not have to have outages for backups. We will start at 17:00 UTC. The outage will last several hours.

It is back up now.

I knew that covered Boinc, but didn't know about Classic.  On another note the network connections for BOINC seeem to have been messed up in the outage. Nobody has been able to xmit since they came back up.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on May 07, 2005, 09:48:10 am
The cogent link went down at 07:00 UTC (00:00 PDT) this morning. It looks like it may be down all weekend again.

 The link is now up but overwhelmed
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: RazalYllib on May 19, 2005, 07:48:17 am
Anyone notice no BOINC Taldren Team?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on May 19, 2005, 09:39:59 pm
Anyone notice no BOINC Taldren Team?



http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=4
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on May 31, 2005, 07:27:14 am
I drag myself into the top 4500.

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    34446

Total CPU Time    13.602 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 27 min 32.9 sec
Average results received per day    28.07

SETI@home user for:   3.363 years

Your rank out of 5430051 total users is:    4499th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.917% of our users.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 01, 2005, 06:37:57 pm
Congratulations IKV Nemesis  :)

From the Boinc front page:
June 1, 2005
We are switching the http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ URL to point here. The SETI@home Classic web site has been moved to http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 02, 2005, 05:39:56 am
As of this morning, I have managed to get into the top 10 for the team :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 02, 2005, 05:38:47 pm
Congratulations IKV Nemesis  :)

From the Boinc front page:
June 1, 2005
We are switching the [url]http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/[/url] URL to point here. The SETI@home Classic web site has been moved to [url]http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu[/url].


Of course you know what happened.  They did a renumbering and I went to 4593.  But I WILL be back. 

:)

                  :ufo:                  :ufo:                   :ufo:               I be stubborn.                  :ufo:                  :ufo:                  :ufo:
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 10, 2005, 09:22:11 pm
on wards and up wards!  :)  #9  ;D
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 13, 2005, 05:12:16 pm
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/tech_news.php

News about the future of classic and BOINC.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 18, 2005, 09:04:55 pm

Of course you know what happened.  They did a renumbering and I went to 4593.  But I WILL be back. 

:)

                  :ufo:                  :ufo:                   :ufo:               I be stubborn.                  :ufo:                  :ufo:                  :ufo:

I'm back.

Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    35262
Your rank out of 5435727 total users is:    4500th place.
You have completed more work units than    99.917% of our users.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on June 19, 2005, 07:16:52 am
Congrats Again!  :)  How far down did they bump you?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 19, 2005, 07:40:17 am
Congrats Again!  :)  How far down did they bump you?

4499 - 4593.

Now to see if they do it again.  Otherwise onward to 4000!!
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 21, 2005, 06:52:21 pm
Congrats Again!  :)  How far down did they bump you?

Bumped down yet again.  This time to 4523 so it shouldn't take me too long to get back.  I was down to 4483 when I uploaded yesterday.  Todays upload has taken me back to 4518 already.  Next time should be enough to keep me there.  Then onwards to 4000. 

Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 23, 2005, 06:35:40 pm
Congrats Again!  :)

Back again. 

Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    4494th place.

This time to stay I think.  Now onward to the top 4000 (and being bounced out of it a few times :) )
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 24, 2005, 06:35:47 pm
Back again. 

Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    4494th place.

This time to stay I think.  Now onward to the top 4000 (and being bounced out of it a few times :) )

Out again (4512).  I swear they must be watching to recalculate everytime I post that I'm into the top 4500.  I have already moved back to 4503 and should be back again early in the morning THEN they should not be able to bounce me again. 

 :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on June 26, 2005, 05:35:11 pm
Out again (4512).  I swear they must be watching to recalculate everytime I post that I'm into the top 4500.  I have already moved back to 4503 and should be back again early in the morning THEN they should not be able to bounce me again. 

 :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

I'm back in and they renumbered already and I'm still in so I guess it is permanent.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on July 22, 2005, 09:24:38 am
Out again (4512).  I swear they must be watching to recalculate everytime I post that I'm into the top 4500.  I have already moved back to 4503 and should be back again early in the morning THEN they should not be able to bounce me again. 

 :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

I'm back in and they renumbered already and I'm still in so I guess it is permanent.

Well, with BOINC soaking up all of the time and resources, They haven't done a recalc or updated the class lists since 7/4.  It certainly makes it easier when they don't keep bouncing you down the list.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on July 22, 2005, 04:28:30 pm
Well, wouldn't you know it.  They are doing an update of the class pages and a recalc of everybodies position as I type this.  :o
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on August 27, 2005, 05:34:35 am
In a small note,  today I have made it inside of 20K for the first time. :)

 The Postman   
Results Received  13440
Total CPU Time  7.530 years 
Average CPU Time per work unit  4 hr 54 min 29.3 sec 
Average results received per day  13.92 
Last result returned: Sat Aug 27 09:11:21 2005 UTC
Registered on: Sat Jan 4 22:34:07 2003 UTC
SETI@home user for: 2.645 years
Your group info:
You belong to the group named:  Taldren
   
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
 
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:  19990th place. 
The number of users who have this rank:  4 
You have completed more work units than  99.632% of our users. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on October 23, 2005, 08:38:27 am
In case somebody on the classic team hasn't heard this yet:

Quote
October 10, 2005 - 23:30 UTC
Last week we finished the first phase of the science "migration." What this means is that all of the scientific results from SETI@home classic have been migrated over to the BOINC science database. There is a bit of cleanup work to be done, but the next big phase is merging these data with BOINC data. We will soon be able to shut down the classic master science database, which is currently running on the same server as the BOINC scheduler.

All of you are more than welcome to join the rest of the Taldren team on BOINC when classic does actually end. We hope you will join us there! :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on October 23, 2005, 01:27:18 pm
In case somebody on the classic team hasn't heard this yet:

Quote
October 10, 2005 - 23:30 UTC
Last week we finished the first phase of the science "migration." What this means is that all of the scientific results from SETI@home classic have been migrated over to the BOINC science database. There is a bit of cleanup work to be done, but the next big phase is merging these data with BOINC data. We will soon be able to shut down the classic master science database, which is currently running on the same server as the BOINC scheduler.

All of you are more than welcome to join the rest of the Taldren team on BOINC when classic does actually end. We hope you will join us there! :)

Where did they post that?

Myself I plan to stay with SETI 1 until either the end or 50,000 WUs whichever comes first, then decide what to do about BOINC or an alternate project.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on October 23, 2005, 02:01:42 pm
Quote
Where did they post that?


http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/tech_news.php

The general feeling is that classic has just weeks, not months, to go before total shut down. Part of the requirement was that a new 5.x GUI be finished and that the new Science app come out of beta. Both conditions have been met. The net result will be that Astropulse will become active, the curent WU's will be reissued and examined in much greater detail (2x - 3x longer crunch times)and the new arrays will start feeding data tapes for parts of the sky never seen before in SETI.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on October 23, 2005, 06:08:00 pm
[url]http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/tech_news.php[/url]

The general feeling is that classic has just weeks, not months, to go before total shut down. Part of the requirement was that a new 5.x GUI be finished and that the new Science app come out of beta. Both conditions have been met. The net result will be that Astropulse will become active, the curent WU's will be reissued and examined in much greater detail (2x - 3x longer crunch times)and the new arrays will start feeding data tapes for parts of the sky never seen before in SETI.


I would have thought that important enough to put on the main page as an announcement. 

As I said earlier I plan to stay with SETI 1 until either the end or 50,000 WUs whichever comes first, then decide what to do about BOINC or an alternate project.

Meanwhile I have reached a landmark.

Your credit:
Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    40000
Total CPU Time    15.608 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 25 min 05.4 sec
Average results received per day    29.14
Last result returned:   Sun Oct 23 23:03:05 2005 UTC
Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC

SETI@home user for:   3.761 years
You belong to the group named:    Taldren
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    4176th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    7
You have completed more work units than    99.923% of our users.

Looks like a few people chose 40,000 WUs as a stopping point. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on October 23, 2005, 07:31:39 pm
I too plan to keep crunching until they pull the plug. I am going to retake the number 2 spot in my class list and just MAYBE get to the golden WU. Any idea where that is these days? I am guessing it is somewhere between 16K and 18K.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on October 23, 2005, 07:36:53 pm
I too plan to keep crunching until they pull the plug. I am going to retake the number 2 spot in my class list and just MAYBE get to the golden WU. Any idea where that is these days? I am guessing it is somewhere between 16K and 18K.


Here is a link to Stan Popes page (http://members.aol.com/StanDCmr/setipage.htm).

The current Golden WU is 16044.6 and advancing by 3.97 WUs per day.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on November 07, 2005, 05:19:44 pm
 Subject: re: classic coming to an end... Message 1 of 2   
  Posted by Matt Lebofsky   on Nov 7, 2005 at 10:24   

Regarding posts about the "December 15" shutdown date. Sorry I didn't post that
over here - bear in mind that nothing is really official until it makes it to
the news on the front page (or technical news). Though we really really really
want to stick to this schedule, it may slip a week or two. Anyway, expect a
mass e-mail soon, funny warnings from your classic clients, a note on the classic
home page, etc.

 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on November 07, 2005, 06:46:07 pm
Quote
Matt Lebofsky
Project developer

Joined: Mar 1, 1999
Posts: 247
ID: 122079
Credit: 35,398
RAC: 22
Message 186528 - Posted 7 Nov 2005 1:48:42 UTC

December 15th is the current target date. Have a big outage soon for a big step in the master migration database, and then when we're back up start sending out the mass e-mail saying it's time to start moving over.

- Matt

Quote
Big outage: master migration (merging old SETI@home classic science database with BOINC). Everything needs to stop for this to happen, and may take 24-76 hours. Don't want new users coming over to BOINC and finding it down for several days. Of course we'll post news items about this when we have a better idea when this will happen.

Remember this is only the current planned cutoff date, and may slip a week or two, but we're really trying to stick to this one.

- Matt

Quote
Actually, we might be able to get by without an outage - we're working that out now. You can see why I don't post things to the front page until we are a lot more certain about events/dates/times...

- Matt
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on November 19, 2005, 10:27:56 pm
Subject: re: classic coming to an end... Message 1 of 2   
  Posted by Matt Lebofsky   on Nov 7, 2005 at 10:24   

Regarding posts about the "December 15" shutdown date. Sorry I didn't post that
over here - bear in mind that nothing is really official until it makes it to
the news on the front page (or technical news). Though we really really really
want to stick to this schedule, it may slip a week or two. Anyway, expect a
mass e-mail soon, funny warnings from your classic clients, a note on the classic
home page, etc.

Now on the front page

Quote
The old SETI@home Classic project will stop issuing work on December 15, 2005. Anyone still running SETI@home Classic should deactivate it and install SETI@home/BOINC (see instructions under 'Getting started' on this page).

I won't be making it to 50,000 WUs but maybe to the top 4,000  (currently 4101st place.) 

It says "stop issuing work", no mention of when it stops accepting work returns.   Load your caches.  ;)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on November 20, 2005, 09:44:42 am
Quote
It says "stop issuing work", no mention of when it stops accepting work returns.   Load your caches. 

from classic home page
Quote
News


November 15, 2005
On December 15, 2005, after 6 years of operation, this project will shut down. But SETI@home is not going away. We're alive and well and running on the BOINC distributed computing platform. It's easy to switch over - just follow the instructions on the new SETI@home web site. We hope to see everyone there!

At the time of shutdown, the stats for this project will be frozen but will continue to be available on the web.

Thanks to all original SETI@home participants for their tremendous dedication to the project. You made SETI@home into something of lasting significance.


I read somewhere that they are pulling the plug on the servers on 12/15. Although on another forum boinc thread I think I read you could upload for a couple of days after that.


Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on November 21, 2005, 07:05:27 pm


The SETI EMAIL has arrived

Quote
[/Subject: SETI@home News
Date: 11/21/2005 5:09:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From: setiweb@ssl.berkeley.edu
Reply To: 
To: 
CC: 
BCC: 
Sent on: 
Sent from the Internet (Details) 
********************************************************************
SETI@home completes the switch to BOINC
----------------------------------------------------
SETI@home has completed its transition to BOINC (Berkeley Open Infrastructure
for Network Computing). BOINC, developed at U.C. Berkeley, is a framework for
volunteer computing projects like SETI@home.

Switching your computer to the new "SETI@home/BOINC" is easy. Visit
[url]http://setiathome.berkeley.edu[/url] for instructions. We'll be shutting down the
"SETI@home Classic" project on December 15. The workunit totals of users and
teams will be frozen at that point, and the final totals will be available on
the web.

Scientists at other universities are using BOINC to create volunteer computing
projects in areas like molecular biology, high-energy physics, and climate
change study. See [url]http://boinc.berkeley.edu[/url] for more information. BOINC lets
you donate computer time to multiple causes, divided up however you want. For
example, your PC could spend 40% of its time searching for extraterrestrial
life (SETI@home), 30% studying climate change ([url]http://climateprediction.net[/url]),
and 30% studying protein folding, design and docking (Rosetta@home:
[url]http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/[/url]).

You can run SETI@home 100% of the time if you want. But we strongly encourage
you to participate in other projects. Doing so ensures that when SETI@home is
down or has no work, your computer stays busy helping other researchers.

Support SETI@home
----------------------------------------------------
SETI@home is increasingly reliant on individual donations. Without the support
of individuals like you the project will not be able to continue. We urge all
SETI@home participants to make a yearly donation to keep the project going:
[url]http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/donate.php[/url]

----------------------------------------------------
Thanks again for your participation in SETI@home.

The SETI@home Team
[url]http://setiathome.berkeley.edu[/url]
quote]
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on November 21, 2005, 08:35:02 pm


The SETI EMAIL has arrived


Not in my mail box.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on November 22, 2005, 07:18:46 pm
from tech news
Quote
November 22, 2005 - 21:30 UTC
We began sending out the mass e-mail yesterday warning SETI@home classic users that we are going to close down the old project on December 15th. It was sent to all 200,000 of the active classic users by this morning. Inactive classic users are being e-mailed at this point.
Due to the influx of new BOINC users (and the unfortunate timing of some googlebots and other web spiders) the load on our web server was extremely high for the past 12 hours. To fix this, we finally deployed a second web server to split the load. As DNS updates spread throughout the internet, the load on klaatu (the original single web server) decreases while the load on penguin (the new secondary web server) increases. Both are Sun D220R's (2 x 440MHz Sparc, 2 GB RAM).

Part of the problem was that the web servers were configured to spawn more many clients than actually necessary, which left lingering, unused threads open on the database, which in turn lead to the database running out of connections. Some users saw messages to this effect when the load on the web servers was at its highest.

This looked like a database problem, when in fact we are currently enjoying a 10% performance boost on the database. Last week we moved some memory off the myisam tables (which contain web forum info and not much else) and slated it for the innodb tables (which contain user, host, result, workunit, etc. tables). The myisam tables didn't need the excess memory.

By the way, the master database merge (see below) is currently on for the beginning of next week
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on November 22, 2005, 08:51:37 pm
I still haven't gotten the E-Mail from SETI but my SETIQueue is now delivering the message:

Quote
You are running a client from the original SETI@home project. This project will be shutting down on 12/15/2005. Please join the new SETI@Home project at http: // setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/

The voice error message from SETIQueue was unlike any I have heard from it before and doesn't even hint that there is a message from SETI.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Darth Sidious on November 23, 2005, 06:50:20 am
It's been a long run.

I've had to hang up turning in units midyear, and with only my home boxes (already processor light); running seti full time wasnt an option.

Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 02, 2005, 10:21:55 am
Anybody else see the transmit passes getting bogged down on classic?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sirgod on December 02, 2005, 10:49:27 am
question for you gentlemen, Do you want a new Thread for the Seti topic stickied? I was just looking and this one is getting pretty large. It's all up to you guys, just let me know If It would help you out.

Stephen
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 02, 2005, 06:21:35 pm
question for you gentlemen, Do you want a new Thread for the Seti topic stickied? I was just looking and this one is getting pretty large. It's all up to you guys, just let me know If It would help you out.

Stephen

Nah, Thanks for the thought though. This version of SETI is going to have it's final swan song on 12/15. As soon as the final stats are done, I am going to post them here as a final record of what the team did. I would say that after 1/1/06, it could be unstuck and it can slide into the great unknown. If any other team member has some thoughts on this, speak up now. The other smaller thread is current and will continue to be used for BOINC messages.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 02, 2005, 06:50:39 pm
Anybody else see the transmit passes getting bogged down on classic?

Yep.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sirgod on December 05, 2005, 11:24:30 am
question for you gentlemen, Do you want a new Thread for the Seti topic stickied? I was just looking and this one is getting pretty large. It's all up to you guys, just let me know If It would help you out.

Stephen

Nah, Thanks for the thought though. This version of SETI is going to have it's final swan song on 12/15. As soon as the final stats are done, I am going to post them here as a final record of what the team did. I would say that after 1/1/06, it could be unstuck and it can slide into the great unknown. If any other team member has some thoughts on this, speak up now. The other smaller thread is current and will continue to be used for BOINC messages.

Hey no problem at all, I'm looking forward to you you guys keeping the SETI thing going.

Stephen
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 05, 2005, 06:34:45 pm
Hey no problem at all, I'm looking forward to you you guys keeping the SETI thing going.

Stephen

We should replace the energizer bunny in the ads. We keep going for year after year.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: RazalYllib on December 06, 2005, 06:14:12 pm
I went boinc some time ago and only recently transfered the wife's box to boinc. Come tax return time, it will be time to purchase a new machine!. Got my eye on a duel slot mb that might be just the thing I must have. It's rather substantial number crunching potential will increase my WU total. My spouse will get my box, her's will then get a wipe/refurbish and become my new file/dns server. I have the extra IP I am paying for, just do not have the hardware to plug in yet. I should be then able to easily afford a bare bones box to run the OP server on. If all goes well by this time next year, I could have 5 boxes crunching and crunching...
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 13, 2005, 07:35:27 pm
With a day to spare Classic is working correctly again.  After uploading hundreds of processed and stored WUs I have reached the top 4000.

Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    42376
Total CPU Time    16.462 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 24 min 11.1 sec
Average results received per day    29.76
Last result returned:   Wed Dec 14 01:32:13 2005 UTC

Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    3961st place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.927% of our users.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 13, 2005, 07:41:08 pm
With a day to spare Classic is working correctly again.  After uploading hundreds of processed and stored WUs I have reached the top 4000.

Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    42376
Total CPU Time    16.462 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 24 min 11.1 sec
Average results received per day    29.76
Last result returned:   Wed Dec 14 01:32:13 2005 UTC

Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    3961st place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.927% of our users.

Congratulations :)  At least one of us is going to make his goals. I, on the other hand, am going to come up short of 15K and have slipped into 3rd place in my class lists (I think).
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 15, 2005, 04:44:24 pm
Quote
On December 15, 2005, after 6 years of operation, Classic SETI@home sent out its last workunit. The current SETI@home project is up and running. Please join us! The new software uses the BOINC distributed computing platform, which enables your computer to work on other scientific endeavors like SETI@home if you wish. We could all use your CPU cycles! It's easy to switch over - just follow the instructions on the new SETI@home web site. We hope to see everyone there!
At the time of shutdown, the stats for this project will be frozen but will continue to be available on the web. It may take several weeks to clean everything up and syncronize the classic stats with the current SETI@home project.

Thanks to all original SETI@home participants for their tremendous dedication to the project. You made SETI@home into something of lasting significance
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 15, 2005, 05:53:54 pm
They are still accepting WUs and as long as they do I will keep processing and sending my cache.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 16, 2005, 03:43:32 pm
I'm going to use SETI 1 to "burn in" my new laptop (just bought).  It should give me a fairly good idea of how the Turion 64 CPU performs relative to my Athlon XPs.  Given my cache I can do the burn in even if SETI 1 stops taking the WU returns.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 16, 2005, 08:27:48 pm
I have not been able to Upload even one since they pulled the plug. I still have 20 in my cache.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 17, 2005, 08:42:53 pm
I have not been able to Upload even one since they pulled the plug. I still have 20 in my cache.

I am still managing some uploads my cache holds ~450 WUs. 

One Linux machine is attempting to download the BOINC client at present.  I haven't tried running BOINC on Linux before so it is a learning experience.  For now I will continue with SETI 1 on the other 3 machines.

My laptop is approximately equalling the performance of my Athlon XP 3200+ so I am fairly pleased with that.  I am not as happy with the Windows XP Home that came with it.  It seems to randomly choose to consider buttons pointed at in passing as having been pressed.  Quite annoying as I am just getting used to the touchpad.  I may get a portable trackball instead if I can find one that I like.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Darth Sidious on December 18, 2005, 09:01:46 am
Most built in trackpads can be 'pushed' to click.

check the control panels for the 'pad, and disable that function
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 18, 2005, 09:43:11 am
Most built in trackpads can be 'pushed' to click.

check the control panels for the 'pad, and disable that function

I found that setting on my second attempt but it does not turn if off altogether just makes it harder to do by accident.  I still think I will go for the track ball if I can find one that I like.

Thanks for the suggestion.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 23, 2005, 09:29:39 pm
Quote
December 23, 2005
Yesterday we stopped accepting results for SETI@home Classic. The Classic project stats are now frozen.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 24, 2005, 08:39:28 am
Quote
December 23, 2005
Yesterday we stopped accepting results for SETI@home Classic. The Classic project stats are now frozen.

I hadn't seen that but had deduced it which is why two more of my machines went BOINC yesterday.  I figured that they had given an extra week for uploading. 

Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    42657
SETI@home user for:   3.929 years
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    3955th place.
You have completed more work units than    99.927% of our users.

I'm now moving up the BOINC list.

13) IKV Nemesis     1,585.10     123.89     Canada

One final posting of the rankings for the original team:

1) Raven     322533     188.675 years    5 hr 07 min 27.8 sec    Tue May 31 18:53:25 2005    United States
2) Putanginamo    201013    98.422 years    4 hr 17 min 20.9 sec    Wed Dec 10 13:05:14 2003    Philippines
3) ICE Gambler     79306    63.034 years    6 hr 57 min 45.2 sec    Fri Dec 16 06:48:42 2005    United States
4) IKV Nemesis     42555    16.523 years    3 hr 24 min 04.7 sec    Mon Dec 19 02:45:51 2005    Canada
5) Dragon93     33185    43.528 years    11 hr 29 min 24.8 sec    Sat Dec 3 03:24:28 2005    United States
6) Phillip Showel     32761    28.441 years    7 hr 36 min 17.5 sec    Wed Jul 13 01:47:50 2005    United States
7) The Postman     14933    8.207 years    4 hr 48 min 51.1 sec    Sat Dec 17 15:50:02 2005    United States
8) Kenneth Yeast     12514    8.907 years    6 hr 14 min 06.0 sec    Thu Sep 29 04:43:50 2005    United States
9) Noah Wallace III User Profile    12060    9.224 years    6 hr 42 min 00.7 sec    Fri Mar 4 22:21:28 2005    United States
10) KD4     11857    6.003 years    4 hr 26 min 06.7 sec    Fri Aug 6 06:29:47 2004    United States
11) ChAotiCIllusion     11074    4.068 years    3 hr 13 min 05.4 sec    Fri Mar 4 23:44:49 2005    United Kingdom
12) KBF Mazeppa     9838    12.136 years    10 hr 48 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jun 10 20:30:56 2005    United States
13) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
14) lapt    8699    3.957 years    3 hr 59 min 05.8 sec    Fri Dec 16 13:17:40 2005    United States
15) Nasim    7500    3.078 years    3 hr 35 min 41.8 sec    Tue Feb 15 01:17:01 2005    Canada
16) Intrepid-XC     6952    6.077 years    7 hr 39 min 27.9 sec    Wed Jun 15 11:00:36 2005    United States
17) KBF-Dogmatix  User Profile    5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
18) RazalYllib     5686    5.434 years    8 hr 22 min 16.6 sec    Sat Oct 1 17:10:01 2005    United States
19) SGM RAS     5433    8.511 years    13 hr 43 min 23.4 sec    Fri Dec 16 16:01:04 2005    United States
20) Sven Forkbeard     5137    7.451 years    12 hr 42 min 23.2 sec    Thu May 26 21:18:40 2005    United States
21) Fahrenheit User Profile    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
22) digi    4509    1.916 years    3 hr 43 min 23.4 sec    Mon Jun 14 06:45:05 2004    United Kingdom
23) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
24) Ronbo     4306    3.327 years    6 hr 46 min 06.3 sec    Tue Mar 15 03:03:10 2005    United States
25) Bill Castner     4268    2.706 years    5 hr 33 min 12.0 sec    Mon Aug 23 22:29:39 2004    United States
26) Jim     4043    3.164 years    6 hr 51 min 18.0 sec    Fri Dec 16 18:58:50 2005    United States
27) Hollis J. Wood    4000    3.464 years    7 hr 35 min 08.6 sec    Fri Nov 25 13:12:21 2005    Canada
28) RedHotChiliDog    3738    1.635 years    3 hr 49 min 54.8 sec    Tue Oct 19 02:47:48 2004    United States
29) f9TH SIR X     3553    2.738 years    6 hr 45 min 05.2 sec    Sun Jul 4 00:46:20 2004    New Zealand
30) hobbesmaster     3498    1.964 years    4 hr 55 min 10.1 sec    Wed Jun 8 18:32:30 2005    United States
31) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
32) BobGraham     2920    1.874 years    5 hr 37 min 19.3 sec    Wed Oct 12 17:08:26 2005    United States
33) Reffet     2588    1.821 years    6 hr 09 min 48.3 sec    Fri Nov 18 05:44:46 2005    United States
34) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
35) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
36) Xeir     2117    3.176 years    13 hr 08 min 33.6 sec    Sat Dec 10 00:14:58 2005    United States
37) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
38) Iceman     1874    1.470 years    6 hr 52 min 23.4 sec    Tue Nov 8 13:38:34 2005    United States
39) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
40) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
41) Malystryx_XC     1437    1.613 years    9 hr 50 min 02.0 sec    Sat May 1 19:54:43 2004    United States
42) AJTK     1317    1.540 years    10 hr 14 min 29.1 sec    Wed Sep 22 09:19:01 2004    United States
43) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
44) Kroma BaSyl User Profile    1152    5610 hr 42 min    4 hr 52 min 13.4 sec    Sat Oct 23 15:46:20 2004    United States
45) Daniel     1098    1.917 years    15 hr 17 min 43.2 sec    Thu Dec 15 20:20:03 2005    United States
46) davezzzz    1045    1.372 years    11 hr 30 min 00.9 sec    Thu Mar 3 23:22:25 2005    United States
47) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
48) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
49) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
50) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
51) Rick Regan     822    5872 hr 18 min    7 hr 08 min 38.1 sec    Sun Aug 28 23:58:38 2005    United States
52) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
53) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
54) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
55) Harlequin     622    4646 hr 27 min    7 hr 28 min 12.7 sec    Thu Aug 5 13:38:10 2004    United Kingdom
56) TAG-Draco     614    6454 hr 07 min    10 hr 30 min 41.7 sec    Mon May 16 05:06:15 2005    United States
57) thirdleg     602    2763 hr 41 min    4 hr 35 min 27.0 sec    Mon Apr 5 03:36:56 2004    United States
58) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
59) TalonClaw     587    1.477 years    22 hr 02 min 08.6 sec    Mon Oct 11 20:58:03 2004    United States
60) Matsukasi     586    1.258 years    18 hr 48 min 25.3 sec    Sun Feb 27 21:12:23 2005    United States
61) Toasty0 User Profile    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
62) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids  User Profile    546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
63) ActiveX     515    2114 hr 00 min    4 hr 06 min 17.4 sec    Fri Aug 27 22:30:06 2004    United States
64) Captain_Krenn     509    6539 hr 08 min    12 hr 50 min 49.3 sec    Wed Jun 23 19:30:59 2004    United States
65) Speaker to Aliens  User Profile    501    8462 hr 56 min    16 hr 53 min 31.5 sec    Fri Sep 3 19:43:07 2004    United Kingdom
66) nexa1     479    2457 hr 31 min    5 hr 07 min 49.9 sec    Tue Jun 22 11:47:33 2004    United States
67) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
68) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
69) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
70) Towelie     408    4327 hr 50 min    10 hr 36 min 26.8 sec    Sat Jul 24 18:00:06 2004    United States
71) Tanked_Up     402    4984 hr 56 min    12 hr 24 min 01.3 sec    Sat Jul 3 10:42:43 2004    United Kingdom
72) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
73) Grimklink     339    1.265 years    32 hr 40 min 37.6 sec    Fri Jan 7 00:19:36 2005    United States
74) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
75) SPQR Kremen     317    1909 hr 32 min    6 hr 01 min 25.6 sec    Thu Jul 15 12:13:12 2004    Australia
76) Lancer of TAC     312    4683 hr 08 min    15 hr 00 min 36.2 sec    Fri Mar 26 18:26:57 2004    United States
77) Spectre  User Profile    295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
78) awm3     288    2515 hr 47 min    8 hr 44 min 07.3 sec    Sat Mar 27 03:26:17 2004    Canada
79) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
80) Chrisr118     257    1247 hr 54 min    4 hr 51 min 20.4 sec    Fri Oct 22 19:06:11 2004    Canada
81) Otenki     250    1407 hr 00 min    5 hr 37 min 40.9 sec    Wed Mar 2 00:05:56 2005    Canada
82) Rob     248    3134 hr 55 min    12 hr 38 min 27.0 sec    Thu May 12 21:00:19 2005    United States
83) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
84) keravnos     233    2873 hr 10 min    12 hr 19 min 52.2 sec    Sun Jan 2 16:06:45 2005    Greece
85) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
86) Tus  User Profile    186    1484 hr 18 min    7 hr 58 min 48.4 sec    Fri Jun 25 23:31:49 2004    United States
87) jimmythehat    185    1957 hr 28 min    10 hr 34 min 51.3 sec    Sun Sep 25 18:27:04 2005    United States
88) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
89) Max     179    2800 hr 23 min    15 hr 38 min 40.5 sec    Fri Apr 30 12:03:32 2004    United Kingdom
90) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
91) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
92) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
93) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
94) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
95) Lairis     150    1618 hr 06 min    10 hr 47 min 14.4 sec    Wed Nov 24 20:05:51 2004    United States
96) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
97) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
98) clintk     125    1208 hr 41 min    9 hr 40 min 10.5 sec    Tue Nov 8 22:22:35 2005    United Kingdom
99) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
100) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
101) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
102) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
103) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
104) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
105) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
106) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
107) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
108) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
109) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
110) Sakrot  User Profile    71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
111) F9thTheJudge     71    2805 hr 47 min    39 hr 31 min 05.2 sec    Tue Jul 5 01:57:40 2005    United States
112) Cross     65    202 hr 22 min    3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec    Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004    United States
113) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
114) Apocolypse  User Profile    52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
115) GreenLantern User Profile    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
116) sirgod  User Profile    48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
117) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
118) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
119) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
120) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
121) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
122) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
123) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
124) Hilton     29    812 hr 16 min    28 hr 00 min 33.5 sec    Sat Jun 19 04:46:04 2004    United States
125) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
126) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
127) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
128) SlackerJoe     25    148 hr 18 min    5 hr 55 min 56.1 sec    Thu Jun 24 04:48:31 2004    United States
129) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
130)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
131) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
132) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
133) SFCSpoonman  User Profile    16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
134) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
135) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
136) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
137) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
138) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
139) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
140) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
141) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
142) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
143) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
144) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
145) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
146) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
147) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
148) FRA_C_Blade_XC  User Profile    4    31 hr 48 min    7 hr 57 min 01.0 sec    Fri Mar 19 03:22:30 2004    United States
149) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
150) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
151) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
152) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
153) Beanardo  User Profile    2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
154) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
155) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
156) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
157) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
158) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
159) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States

Well done all and Merry Christmas.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 24, 2005, 08:42:21 am
Name (and URL)  The Postman   
Results Received  14951
Total CPU Time  8.213 years 
Average CPU Time per work unit  4 hr 48 min 44.4 sec 
Average results received per day  13.78 
SETI@home user for: 2.972 years
Last result returned: Wed Dec 21 11:08:49 2005 UTC
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:  18348th place. 
The number of users who have this rank:  1 
You have completed more work units than  99.662% of our users. 


Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on December 27, 2005, 07:40:46 am
After doing some poking around, it would seem that the team managed to hang onto 133rd place in the top 200 (the world) and 8th in the small business group. Not bad for a group of gamers from around the world who have never even met in most cases. I hope we can do as well in the long term for BOINC. :)
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on January 06, 2006, 06:45:45 pm
Well the final stats are in: I managed to retake and keep 2nd position in my class. The rest of the team stats are here in PDF format. If they get updated one more time, I will edit and replace with the finals. The team stats were only as of 12/ 19 while we continued to return until 12/21. The class lists were done in  the past few hours.
I would say congratulations to all who contributed and for a job well done.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on January 14, 2006, 09:06:16 am
Quote
In other fun news: We finally got around to adjusting Classic credit for users that showed obvious signs of cheating. In Classic, it was very easy to cheat the system to get credit without doing any actual work. We ended up partially or entirely removing credit for about 900 of the top 10000 users (all of which had about 20000 or more credits). Below that there wasn't enough data to show obvious signs of rampant cheating (not to mention enough time and disk space to run the checks on the remaining several million users). These adjusted credits should be sync'ed up with the BOINC databases soon if not already. Case closed.

This had two results for me. 

1st I moved up a bit in the overall listings

Name (and URL)    IKV Nemesis
Results Received    42657

Total CPU Time    16.555 years
Average CPU Time per work unit    3 hr 23 min 58.6 sec
Average results received per day    29.31
Last result returned:   Thu Dec 22 03:44:31 2005 UTC

Registered on:   Sun Jan 20 04:23:27 2002 UTC
    View Registration Class
SETI@home user for:   3.988 years

You belong to the group named:    Taldren
You are not currently the founder of any teams.
    
Your rank: (based on current workunits received)
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:    3547th place.
The number of users who have this rank:    1
You have completed more work units than    99.935% of our users.

2nd our teams #2 has had his results deleted so everyone below him including myself move up 1 notch and the team loses a lot of WUs.

Name (and URL)    Results
received    Total CPU time    Average CPU time
per work unit    Date Last Result Received    Country
1) Raven     322533    188.675 years    5 hr 07 min 27.8 sec    Tue May 31 18:53:25 2005    United States
2) ICE Gambler     79307    63.046 years    6 hr 57 min 49.8 sec    Mon Dec 19 09:55:12 2005    United States
3) IKV Nemesis     42657    16.555 years    3 hr 23 min 58.6 sec    Thu Dec 22 03:44:31 2005    Canada
4) Dragon93     33185    43.528 years    11 hr 29 min 24.8 sec    Sat Dec 3 03:24:28 2005    United States
5) Phillip Showel     32761    28.441 years    7 hr 36 min 17.5 sec    Wed Jul 13 01:47:50 2005    United States
6) The Postman     14951    8.213 years    4 hr 48 min 44.4 sec    Wed Dec 21 11:08:49 2005    United States
7) Kenneth Yeast     12514    8.907 years    6 hr 14 min 06.0 sec    Thu Sep 29 04:43:50 2005    United States
8) Noah Wallace III User Profile    12060    9.224 years    6 hr 42 min 00.7 sec    Fri Mar 4 22:21:28 2005    United States
9) KD4     11857    6.003 years    4 hr 26 min 06.7 sec    Fri Aug 6 06:29:47 2004    United States
10) ChAotiCIllusion     11074    4.068 years    3 hr 13 min 05.4 sec    Fri Mar 4 23:44:49 2005    United Kingdom
11) KBF Mazeppa     9838    12.136 years    10 hr 48 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jun 10 20:30:56 2005    United States
12) Sethan     9441    6.151 years    5 hr 42 min 27.4 sec    Sun Mar 7 23:16:44 2004    United States
13) lapt    8699    3.957 years    3 hr 59 min 05.8 sec    Fri Dec 16 13:17:40 2005    United States
14) Nasim    7500    3.078 years    3 hr 35 min 41.8 sec    Tue Feb 15 01:17:01 2005    Canada
15) Intrepid-XC     6952    6.077 years    7 hr 39 min 27.9 sec    Wed Jun 15 11:00:36 2005    United States
16) KBF-Dogmatix  User Profile    5812    4.097 years    6 hr 10 min 30.0 sec    Mon Feb 2 22:13:57 2004    United States
17) RazalYllib     5686    5.434 years    8 hr 22 min 16.6 sec    Sat Oct 1 17:10:01 2005    United States
18) SGM RAS     5433    8.511 years    13 hr 43 min 23.4 sec    Fri Dec 16 16:01:04 2005    United States
19) Sven Forkbeard     5137    7.451 years    12 hr 42 min 23.2 sec    Thu May 26 21:18:40 2005    United States
20) Fahrenheit User Profile    4852    6.747 years    12 hr 10 min 51.6 sec    Tue Dec 30 14:47:06 2003    United States
21) digi    4509    1.916 years    3 hr 43 min 23.4 sec    Mon Jun 14 06:45:05 2004    United Kingdom
22) Renegade001     4490    3.744 years    7 hr 18 min 15.7 sec    Wed Dec 24 21:11:01 2003    United States
23) Ronbo     4306    3.327 years    6 hr 46 min 06.3 sec    Tue Mar 15 03:03:10 2005    United States
24) Bill Castner     4268    2.706 years    5 hr 33 min 12.0 sec    Mon Aug 23 22:29:39 2004    United States
25) Jim     4043    3.164 years    6 hr 51 min 18.0 sec    Fri Dec 16 18:58:50 2005    United States
26) Hollis J. Wood    4000    3.464 years    7 hr 35 min 08.6 sec    Fri Nov 25 13:12:21 2005    Canada
27) RedHotChiliDog    3738    1.635 years    3 hr 49 min 54.8 sec    Tue Oct 19 02:47:48 2004    United States
28) f9TH SIR X     3553    2.738 years    6 hr 45 min 05.2 sec    Sun Jul 4 00:46:20 2004    New Zealand
29) hobbesmaster     3498    1.964 years    4 hr 55 min 10.1 sec    Wed Jun 8 18:32:30 2005    United States
30) Lobo     3024    3.179 years    9 hr 12 min 35.8 sec    Mon Dec 8 02:31:41 2003    United States
31) BobGraham     2920    1.874 years    5 hr 37 min 19.3 sec    Wed Oct 12 17:08:26 2005    United States
32) Reffet     2588    1.821 years    6 hr 09 min 48.3 sec    Fri Nov 18 05:44:46 2005    United States
33) Edge10     2284    2.877 years    11 hr 01 min 57.5 sec    Mon Nov 3 01:16:53 2003    United States
34) MagnumMan    2192    4.157 years    16 hr 36 min 49.4 sec    Thu Mar 28 02:04:13 2002    United States
35) Xeir     2117    3.176 years    13 hr 08 min 33.6 sec    Sat Dec 10 00:14:58 2005    United States
36) JAFO     2099    2.904 years    12 hr 07 min 03.6 sec    Thu Oct 16 15:04:34 2003    United States
37) Iceman     1874    1.470 years    6 hr 52 min 23.4 sec    Tue Nov 8 13:38:34 2005    United States
38) Aldaron     1861    1.791 years    8 hr 25 min 53.7 sec    Fri Oct 17 19:43:35 2003    United States
39) jualdeaux     1821    1.582 years    7 hr 36 min 29.5 sec    Tue Oct 21 22:58:27 2003    United States
40) Malystryx_XC     1437    1.613 years    9 hr 50 min 02.0 sec    Sat May 1 19:54:43 2004    United States
41) AJTK     1317    1.540 years    10 hr 14 min 29.1 sec    Wed Sep 22 09:19:01 2004    United States
42) John Cencerik     1172    2.308 years    17 hr 14 min 51.3 sec    Sat Jul 12 06:47:53 2003    United States
43) Kroma BaSyl User Profile    1152    5610 hr 42 min    4 hr 52 min 13.4 sec    Sat Oct 23 15:46:20 2004    United States
44) Daniel     1098    1.917 years    15 hr 17 min 43.2 sec    Thu Dec 15 20:20:03 2005    United States
45) davezzzz    1045    1.372 years    11 hr 30 min 00.9 sec    Thu Mar 3 23:22:25 2005    United States
46) Michal    1023    2.188 years    18 hr 44 min 09.1 sec    Thu Jan 8 10:50:41 2004    United States
47) Corben Dallas     1020    1.066 years    9 hr 09 min 03.2 sec    Sat Sep 13 23:22:01 2003    United States
48) anarwally     953    2.970 years    27 hr 18 min 06.8 sec    Tue Dec 23 19:17:32 2003    United States
49) Zach     870    1.083 years    10 hr 54 min 30.2 sec    Fri Jul 26 20:13:13 2002    United States
50) Rick Regan     822    5872 hr 18 min    7 hr 08 min 38.1 sec    Sun Aug 28 23:58:38 2005    United States
51) Erik Bethke     789    8559 hr 35 min    10 hr 50 min 55.1 sec    Mon Feb 23 12:47:26 2004    United States
52) bupson     710    7851 hr 23 min    11 hr 03 min 29.9 sec    Mon Dec 9 14:46:28 2002    United States
53) Ed Lacabanne     698    1.082 years    13 hr 35 min 07.1 sec    Mon Jul 21 06:19:39 2003    United States
54) Harlequin     622    4646 hr 27 min    7 hr 28 min 12.7 sec    Thu Aug 5 13:38:10 2004    United Kingdom
55) TAG-Draco     614    6454 hr 07 min    10 hr 30 min 41.7 sec    Mon May 16 05:06:15 2005    United States
56) thirdleg     602    2763 hr 41 min    4 hr 35 min 27.0 sec    Mon Apr 5 03:36:56 2004    United States
57) Michael Malin     590    1.874 years    27 hr 49 min 20.9 sec    Thu Feb 27 13:02:48 2003    United States
58) TalonClaw     587    1.477 years    22 hr 02 min 08.6 sec    Mon Oct 11 20:58:03 2004    United States
59) Matsukasi     586    1.258 years    18 hr 48 min 25.3 sec    Sun Feb 27 21:12:23 2005    United States
60) Toasty0 User Profile    557    3056 hr 19 min    5 hr 29 min 13.6 sec    Sat May 10 22:40:51 2003    United States
61) FerretLXIX, AlienLXIX & Kids  User Profile    546    1.745 years    27 hr 59 min 31.2 sec    Fri Feb 6 21:30:27 2004    United States
62) ActiveX     515    2114 hr 00 min    4 hr 06 min 17.4 sec    Fri Aug 27 22:30:06 2004    United States
63) Captain_Krenn     509    6539 hr 08 min    12 hr 50 min 49.3 sec    Wed Jun 23 19:30:59 2004    United States
64) Speaker to Aliens  User Profile    501    8462 hr 56 min    16 hr 53 min 31.5 sec    Fri Sep 3 19:43:07 2004    United Kingdom
65) nexa1     479    2457 hr 31 min    5 hr 07 min 49.9 sec    Tue Jun 22 11:47:33 2004    United States
66) nexa1     476    4895 hr 00 min    10 hr 17 min 01.1 sec    Thu Oct 3 14:18:27 2002    United States
67) hawkmoon     446    2353 hr 21 min    5 hr 16 min 35.6 sec    Mon Jan 27 00:37:18 2003    Netherlands
68) Kor     410    2451 hr 39 min    5 hr 58 min 46.7 sec    Mon Oct 27 03:43:47 2003    United States
69) Towelie     408    4327 hr 50 min    10 hr 36 min 26.8 sec    Sat Jul 24 18:00:06 2004    United States
70) Tanked_Up     402    4984 hr 56 min    12 hr 24 min 01.3 sec    Sat Jul 3 10:42:43 2004    United Kingdom
71) hawkeye    400    2915 hr 47 min    7 hr 17 min 22.1 sec    Tue Oct 15 20:40:28 2002    United States
72) Grimklink     339    1.265 years    32 hr 40 min 37.6 sec    Fri Jan 7 00:19:36 2005    United States
73) Mark P.     325    4350 hr 40 min    13 hr 23 min 12.0 sec    Wed Mar 20 14:55:17 2002    United States
74) SPQR Kremen     317    1909 hr 32 min    6 hr 01 min 25.6 sec    Thu Jul 15 12:13:12 2004    Australia
75) Lancer of TAC     312    4683 hr 08 min    15 hr 00 min 36.2 sec    Fri Mar 26 18:26:57 2004    United States
76) Spectre  User Profile    295    4819 hr 05 min    16 hr 20 min 09.1 sec    Sun May 26 05:17:35 2002    United States
77) awm3     288    2515 hr 47 min    8 hr 44 min 07.3 sec    Sat Mar 27 03:26:17 2004    Canada
78) David T. Potter     279    2.514 years    78 hr 56 min 57.2 sec    Tue Sep 30 07:26:57 2003    United States
79) Chrisr118     257    1247 hr 54 min    4 hr 51 min 20.4 sec    Fri Oct 22 19:06:11 2004    Canada
80) Otenki     250    1407 hr 00 min    5 hr 37 min 40.9 sec    Wed Mar 2 00:05:56 2005    Canada
81) Rob     248    3134 hr 55 min    12 hr 38 min 27.0 sec    Thu May 12 21:00:19 2005    United States
82) JoeRad     235    1637 hr 20 min    6 hr 58 min 02.5 sec    Sat Nov 8 02:59:49 2003    United States
83) keravnos     233    2873 hr 10 min    12 hr 19 min 52.2 sec    Sun Jan 2 16:06:45 2005    Greece
84) Grith     195    3451 hr 48 min    17 hr 42 min 05.7 sec    Tue Apr 23 00:49:12 2002    United States
85) Tus  User Profile    186    1484 hr 18 min    7 hr 58 min 48.4 sec    Fri Jun 25 23:31:49 2004    United States
86) jimmythehat    185    1957 hr 28 min    10 hr 34 min 51.3 sec    Sun Sep 25 18:27:04 2005    United States
87) DaewAnahos     179    1860 hr 57 min    10 hr 23 min 47.1 sec    Sat May 24 16:43:25 2003    United States
88) Max     179    2800 hr 23 min    15 hr 38 min 40.5 sec    Fri Apr 30 12:03:32 2004    United Kingdom
89) Traigus     161    3291 hr 59 min    20 hr 26 min 49.8 sec    Sun Dec 1 10:16:45 2002    United States
90) Chris Lee     160    1408 hr 45 min    8 hr 48 min 16.9 sec    Thu Sep 18 21:29:44 2003    United States
91) Professional     157    4502 hr 15 min    28 hr 40 min 36.6 sec    Thu Mar 14 21:25:35 2002    Canada
92) Patgod     157    1770 hr 51 min    11 hr 16 min 45.8 sec    Tue Jun 25 13:31:51 2002    United States
93) sfcjb     154    827 hr 17 min    5 hr 22 min 19.3 sec    Wed Feb 12 00:21:52 2003    United States
94) Lairis     150    1618 hr 06 min    10 hr 47 min 14.4 sec    Wed Nov 24 20:05:51 2004    United States
95) Alien 3490     147    2758 hr 23 min    18 hr 45 min 52.2 sec    Mon Nov 29 04:53:35 1999    United States
96) Tim     142    6151 hr 17 min    43 hr 19 min 08.4 sec    Tue Sep 30 06:54:01 2003    United States
97) clintk     125    1208 hr 41 min    9 hr 40 min 10.5 sec    Tue Nov 8 22:22:35 2005    United Kingdom
98) Grin     117    2341 hr 01 min    20 hr 00 min 31.5 sec    Sat Jan 12 00:22:24 2002    United States
99) Durin     116    1458 hr 04 min    12 hr 34 min 10.6 sec    Fri Aug 30 06:04:55 2002    United States
100) Shadow Seraph     112    700 hr 12 min    6 hr 15 min 06.4 sec    Tue Aug 5 09:12:44 2003    United States
101) Aenigma    93    362 hr 54 min    3 hr 54 min 08.1 sec    Fri Oct 24 09:21:02 2003    Netherlands
102) Tx PnGwin     89    3516 hr 23 min    39 hr 30 min 35.9 sec    Sat Mar 15 22:05:03 2003    United States
103) NMZmaster     88    2229 hr 37 min    25 hr 20 min 11.7 sec    Sun Dec 29 02:38:43 2002    United States
104) Redshift     82    870 hr 26 min    10 hr 36 min 54.7 sec    Fri Oct 24 14:54:33 2003    United Kingdom
105) 3dot14     81    1835 hr 11 min    22 hr 39 min 24.0 sec    Sat Nov 15 16:55:54 2003    Canada
106) Alien 3491     79    4114 hr 14 min    52 hr 04 min 44.4 sec    Sun Jul 20 20:48:32 2003    United States
107) Kevin Luker     78    1138 hr 40 min    14 hr 35 min 54.4 sec    Fri Jul 5 07:22:40 2002    United States
108) Tommy     78    860 hr 10 min    11 hr 01 min 40.0 sec    Thu Jul 3 16:58:02 2003    United Kingdom
109) Sakrot  User Profile    71    1377 hr 44 min    19 hr 24 min 17.3 sec    Thu Aug 29 01:37:30 2002    United States
110) F9thTheJudge     71    2805 hr 47 min    39 hr 31 min 05.2 sec    Tue Jul 5 01:57:40 2005    United States
111) Cross     65    202 hr 22 min    3 hr 06 min 48.5 sec    Tue Mar 30 07:32:35 2004    United States
112) Fish     56    622 hr 33 min    11 hr 07 min 01.4 sec    Sat Aug 16 17:46:25 2003    United Kingdom
113) Apocolypse  User Profile    52    1144 hr 12 min    22 hr 00 min 14.6 sec    Sun May 4 07:22:57 2003    United States
114) GreenLantern User Profile    52    961 hr 20 min    18 hr 29 min 14.0 sec    Thu Feb 6 11:53:41 2003    United States
115) sirgod  User Profile    48    772 hr 06 min    16 hr 05 min 07.7 sec    Sat Feb 16 07:04:14 2002    United States
116) PsychadelicSwinger     45    986 hr 55 min    21 hr 55 min 53.7 sec    Fri Feb 8 14:03:28 2002    United States
117) Erik Bethke     43    1847 hr 42 min    42 hr 58 min 12.2 sec    Tue Oct 26 12:41:21 1999    United States
118) Sirg0d     43    371 hr 35 min    8 hr 38 min 29.5 sec    Fri Sep 26 14:22:12 2003    United States
119) TerranceRoff     41    847 hr 06 min    20 hr 39 min 39.6 sec    Mon Dec 9 18:49:41 2002    United States
120) Tantalus     37    692 hr 35 min    18 hr 43 min 07.4 sec    Sat Oct 26 15:53:14 2002    United Kingdom
121) EE     32    652 hr 46 min    20 hr 23 min 57.1 sec    Sat Jan 19 23:10:43 2002    United States
122) Overloaded Ferrets     30    1153 hr 13 min    38 hr 26 min 27.5 sec    Fri Jan 17 02:56:51 2003    United States
123) Hilton     29    812 hr 16 min    28 hr 00 min 33.5 sec    Sat Jun 19 04:46:04 2004    United States
124) Chili_of_Borg     27    404 hr 17 min    14 hr 58 min 24.9 sec    Mon Mar 10 22:12:57 2003    United States
125) pneumonic81     25    846 hr 53 min    33 hr 52 min 32.2 sec    Sat May 11 09:57:21 2002    United States
126) omfMichael     25    355 hr 41 min    14 hr 13 min 39.9 sec    Fri May 2 05:49:34 2003    United States
127) SlackerJoe     25    148 hr 18 min    5 hr 55 min 56.1 sec    Thu Jun 24 04:48:31 2004    United States
128) 5of12     19    128 hr 53 min    6 hr 47 min 01.0 sec    Sun Oct 14 18:10:05 2001    United States
129)     17    93 hr 48 min    5 hr 31 min 03.5 sec    Mon May 26 10:37:18 2003    Australia
130) Wulgaru     16    175 hr 28 min    10 hr 58 min 02.3 sec    Thu Mar 20 23:47:53 2003    Canada
131) FPF-DarkElf     16    861 hr 43 min    53 hr 51 min 27.1 sec    Tue Apr 9 13:56:07 2002    United States
132) SFCSpoonman  User Profile    16    149 hr 12 min    9 hr 19 min 32.7 sec    Wed Oct 2 00:58:13 2002    United States
133) ATimson     11    34 hr 53 min    3 hr 10 min 20.7 sec    Wed Oct 8 01:57:54 2003    United States
134) mouvar1     10    542 hr 58 min    54 hr 17 min 51.8 sec    Sun Dec 21 09:09:46 2003    United States
135) Lurker     10    24 hr 59 min    2 hr 29 min 56.5 sec    Thu Oct 30 01:50:45 2003    United Kingdom
136) BlackJackal     9    698 hr 59 min    77 hr 39 min 58.8 sec    Sun Jan 27 22:29:03 2002    United States
137) cueball2000uk    9    116 hr 59 min    12 hr 59 min 57.5 sec    Sun Apr 13 12:19:07 2003    United Kingdom
138) Baron Jukaga     8    277 hr 45 min    34 hr 43 min 08.6 sec    Wed Jan 16 21:38:35 2002    Canada
139) MazeppaTest1     8    163 hr 38 min    20 hr 27 min 16.9 sec    Thu Jun 6 07:17:21 2002    United States
140) Jester_Taldren     7    243 hr 32 min    34 hr 47 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 13 22:06:54 2001    United States
141) pj lynn     6    234 hr 06 min    39 hr 01 min 04.0 sec    Sun Dec 16 01:20:45 2001    United States
142) Jinxx     5    328 hr 16 min    65 hr 39 min 22.3 sec    Fri Oct 12 13:19:06 2001    United States
143) Obmanta     5    178 hr 47 min    35 hr 45 min 29.7 sec    Thu Nov 28 13:21:56 2002    United States
144) Bolitho     4    183 hr 32 min    45 hr 53 min 03.9 sec    Fri Dec 28 04:02:43 2001    United States
145) Catnip_inc     4    353 hr 41 min    88 hr 25 min 21.0 sec    Fri Jun 7 14:37:56 2002    United States
146) GolferDJ     4    89 hr 47 min    22 hr 26 min 53.0 sec    Tue Dec 17 07:15:11 2002    United States
147) FRA_C_Blade_XC  User Profile    4    31 hr 48 min    7 hr 57 min 01.0 sec    Fri Mar 19 03:22:30 2004    United States
148) Kirk_jr     3    128 hr 22 min    42 hr 47 min 30.0 sec    Sat Mar 4 03:46:31 2000    United States
149) MindBlip     3    39 hr 40 min    13 hr 13 min 29.2 sec    Thu Sep 27 04:59:57 2001    United States
150) Joshua Babb    3    211 hr 29 min    70 hr 29 min 48.7 sec    Fri Oct 5 06:40:45 2001    United States
151) Pestalence     3    69 hr 17 min    23 hr 05 min 46.5 sec    Tue Sep 23 08:13:11 2003    United States
152) Beanardo  User Profile    2    30 hr 49 min    15 hr 24 min 56.0 sec    Tue Dec 4 03:19:25 2001    United States
153) GFL-I-Demandred     2    64 hr 46 min    32 hr 23 min 04.6 sec    Tue Jan 1 04:01:35 2002    United Kingdom
154) ArticFire     2    16 hr 25 min    8 hr 12 min 36.7 sec    Fri Jan 25 11:36:39 2002    United States
155) Sailor Venus     2    56 hr 12 min    28 hr 06 min 00.2 sec    Tue Apr 8 22:32:43 2003    United States
156) Speaker to Aliens     1    29 hr 40 min    29 hr 40 min 05.1 sec    Fri Nov 19 06:53:25 1999    United Kingdom
157) SKINWALKER     1    61 hr 15 min    61 hr 15 min 38.4 sec    Tue Sep 25 19:22:02 2001    United States
158) Harold Nez     1    104 hr 05 min    104 hr 05 min 22.9 sec    Fri Jan 24 14:21:56 2003    United States

Edited because I accidentally trimmed Harold Nez off the bottom of the list.

Edited AGAIN after 9 years because I just noticed a significant mistake.  I had a typo that indicated our number 3 member had his account deleted for cheating and it was the number 2.  Much belated apologizes to the accidentally insulted ICE Gambler. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on January 14, 2006, 10:28:51 am
Name (and URL)  The Postman   
Results Received  14951
Total CPU Time  8.213 years 
Average CPU Time per work unit  4 hr 48 min 44.4 sec 
Average results received per day  13.78 
SETI@home user for: 2.972 years
Last result returned: Wed Dec 21 11:08:49 2005 UTC
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:  18348th place. 
The number of users who have this rank:  1 
You have completed more work units than  99.662% of our users. 




Name (and URL)  The Postman   
Results Received  14951
Total CPU Time  8.213 years 
Average CPU Time per work unit  4 hr 48 min 44.4 sec 
Average results received per day  13.52 
Last result returned: Wed Dec 21 11:08:49 2005 UTC
Registered on: Sat Jan 4 22:34:07 2003 UTC
SETI@home user for: 3.029 years
Your rank out of 5436301 total users is:  17913th place. 
The number of users who have this rank:  2 
You have completed more work units than  99.670% of our users. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on January 14, 2006, 11:24:41 am
I thought that since these are the final listings for SETI 1 that it was appropriate to review our rankings.

Me first since I'm the one posting. 

In Canada I am - 148) IKV Nemesis
In Ontario I am  - 2) IKV Nemesis (.on.ca E-Mail addresses)

Taldren
Teams overall Taldren is - 140) Taldren   
Small company teams - 5) Taldren   168   732486    637.417 years   7 hr 37 min 22.9 sec

Pretty good for a team founded by a company that is no longer with us.  R.I.P.  Taldren.

Raven

Top 1000 users overall - 131) Raven
Home users - 46) Raven
U.S. users - 62) Raven

ICE Gambler
U.S. users - 556) ICE Gambler
Work Users - 541) ICE Gambler

f9TH SIR X
New Zealand users - 509) f9TH SIR X
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: [STGU]daNo on April 03, 2006, 11:05:23 am
I was lucky enough for the first project to be able to admin a small network of computers running 800mhz chips.

SETI@home classic workunits   26,540
SETI@home classic CPU time   144,971 hours (16.55 Years)

Unfortunately dont have access to them anymore to set it up with the new system :/.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 22, 2015, 07:06:27 pm
Just edited my prior post AGAIN after 9 years because I just noticed a significant mistake.  I had a typo that indicated our number 3 member had his account deleted for cheating and it was the number 2.  Much belated apologizes to the accidentally insulted ICE Gambler. 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Entrail on December 08, 2015, 05:48:45 pm
So many years ago but at least I topped NZ

I thought that since these are the final listings for SETI 1 that it was appropriate to review our rankings.

f9TH SIR X
New Zealand users - 509) f9TH SIR X
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 08, 2015, 08:46:48 pm
The team isn't what it once was.  Seems our Glory Days are over :(
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: d4v1ks on December 08, 2015, 09:20:51 pm
That's a lot of resources.
What SETI discovered till now?
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: manitoba1073 on December 09, 2015, 04:39:45 am
The team isn't what it once was.  Seems our Glory Days are over :(

I still let my comp run it overnight when I sleep.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on December 14, 2015, 08:34:51 pm
My RAC has just for the first time hit 10,000.   :smitten:
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Cpt. Gordon on December 15, 2015, 08:40:04 am
Just started running it again after some years. Been on the Planetary Society team for years. So I see there's a Taldren team. Humm.. I guess I will change soon... 
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 26, 2016, 10:44:59 am
Just got back into our top 5 (Number 10 is my old ID).
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on March 03, 2020, 05:41:48 am
SETI is coming to an end    :'(




"On March 31, the volunteer computing part of SETI@home will stop distributing work and will go into hibernation.

We're doing this for two reasons:

1) Scientifically, we're at the point of diminishing returns; basically, we've analyzed all the data we need for now.

2) It's a lot of work for us to manage the distributed processing of data. We need to focus on completing the back-end analysis of the results we already have, and writing this up in a scientific journal paper.

However, SETI@home is not disappearing. The web site and the message boards will continue to operate. We hope that other UC Berkeley astronomers will find uses for the huge computing capabilities of SETI@home for SETI or related areas like cosmology and pulsar research. If this happens, SETI@home will start distributing work again. We'll keep you posted about this.

If you're currently running SETI@home on your computer, we encourage you to attach to other BOINC-based projects as well. Or use Science United and sign up to do astronomy. You can stay attached to SETI@home, of course, but you won't get any jobs until we find new applications.

We're extremely grateful to all of our volunteers for supporting us in many ways during the past 20 years. Without you there would be no SETI@home. We're excited to finish up our original science project, and we look forward to what comes next."
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Sirgod on March 03, 2020, 02:28:41 pm
well shoot, that is the end of another Era.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on March 03, 2020, 03:57:20 pm
It is about time for the papers to be written though.  Who knows what gems are in there.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 27, 2020, 03:51:16 pm
Taldren, Team FINAL Standings, SETI @ HOME 4/27/2020

1) Otenki   23,807,395   0.09   Canada
2) manitoba1073   16,603,244   0.07   United States
3) The Postman Top 1% in average credit   14,960,303   5,989.20   United States
4) Raven   11,034,917   0.08   United States
5) Profile Daniel   9,276,015   254.09   United States
6) Nemesis   5,661,778   0.09   Canada
7) RazalYllib   3,164,358   0.07   United States
8) Profile Tus   1,191,467   0.02   United States
9) davezzzz   1,113,945   0.08   United States
10) bupson   1,022,901   0.08   United States
11) IKV Nemesis   1,020,561   0.05   Canada
12) Kor   1,016,850   0.05   United States
13) DreadlordGW   804,529   0.09   United States
14) ChAotiCIllusion   481,178   0.08   United Kingdom
15) Mazeppza   342,475   0.08   United States
16) Tommy   304,339   0.06   United Kingdom
17) Intrepid-XC   286,719   0.09   United States
18) Profile Noah Wallace III   225,986   0.00   United States
19) Kenneth Yeast [Founder]   113,625   0.10   United States
20) alec_   76,796   1.02   Canada
21) hobbesmaster   32,001   0.08   United States
22) f9TH SIR X   21,135   0.00   New Zealand
23) Matt   20,969   0.06   United States
24) Xeir   19,299   0.09   United States
25) Maxillius   11,968   0.07   United States
26) KD4   11,051   0.00   United States
27) SlackerJoe   10,346   0.07   United States
28) moofighters   10,209   0.07   United States
29) Putanginamo   8,688   0.00   Philippines
30) thirdleg   7,548   0.00   United States
31) 3dot14   4,246   0.10   Canada
32) digi   1,988   0.00   United Kingdom
33) Cayne   1,548   0.00   United States
34) Bill Castner   1,438   0.00   United States
35) Profile ATimson   773   0.09   United States
36) Jonathan Walls   520   0.06   
37) Rob   243   0.00   United States
38) Profile Orthae   80   0.08   United States
39) Administrator   62   0.07   
40) Durin   0   0.00   United States
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: The Postman on April 27, 2020, 04:05:49 pm
Team Taldren Final numbers;

Total credit   93,033,348

Rank by RAC;  364/122,807, Top 99.99%

Team :   Taldren
Percentage of Total BOINC Credit :   0.000238%
Number of users in team :   38
Country :   International
Percentage of Country Total :   N/A%
First Seen :   Sun, 28 Feb 99 19:00:00 -0500
Overall Rank :   1512 of 122,807 (Total Credit)
Percentile :   98.76880%
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Nemesis on April 27, 2020, 04:20:32 pm
Long time no see.  Hope you and yours avoid the virus.  Best of luck.
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: Javora on April 27, 2020, 09:44:48 pm
Wow.  A lot of names I haven’t seen in years.  Brought back memories...
Title: Re: SETI Thread Part III
Post by: GE-Raven on April 26, 2022, 08:20:14 am
I guess I should have stuck with it... Congrats to all!