Topic: OP+ corrections thread  (Read 70333 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #160 on: May 31, 2003, 09:17:15 am »
Well, consider this: none of the other races can use X-heavy rules, so why would the plasma races get better heavies? I'm not saying they don't deserve them, just that it is a factor to consider. If adding PlasD, what about all S and 2 additional Ds? Anyway, I think there are a number of good conversions. It might be worthwhile to test several.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #161 on: May 31, 2003, 10:30:19 am »
It the moment, I am in a state of "wait and see" ..
.. I'm waiting to see if my request for defensive-capable (on default) phX will be acknowledged.


*THE* best point concerning plasma I have heard is "if you downgrade it, it can probably be outrun. That's why I feel the downgrades I have already done is in error. I should have increased the BPV instead with the better PlasmaRs.


As for PlasmaD.. well.. killing 12 drones for free per rack seems, ..well, a bit much. The ship has all those ph1s.. oh sorry, phX, to be able to defend itself as well as be offensive. We've already discussed the phGs, so the ups and downs are all said, there.


.. anyways..
Let's wait and see what happens. There's still 1 patch left.
-- Luc

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #162 on: May 31, 2003, 10:32:57 am »
man, those X-ships are a pain ain't they.

They stirred up all kinds of problems in SFB too.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #163 on: May 31, 2003, 10:35:53 am »
based on the (poorly populated) TechWars server..
.. they're a lot of fun, too.

-- Luc

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #164 on: May 31, 2003, 10:45:23 am »
Never said they weren't fun,  just a balancing nightmare.    

Rod O'neal

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #165 on: June 01, 2003, 12:19:42 am »
Just curious. Why don't you use PlaX for PlaM? Also, how do you adjust for the lack of a PlaL in SFC?

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #166 on: June 01, 2003, 09:13:27 am »
Quote:

Just curious. Why don't you use PlaX for PlaM? Also, how do you adjust for the lack of a PlaL in SFC?  




Plasma L is an easy one, they are identical to the Plasma G in every way except I think they only take up one option mount space.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #167 on: June 01, 2003, 09:48:12 am »
The PLaL also takes no power to hold the charged plasma inside, like the PLaF.

As for the PLaX.. it's too damned fast. speed 40? No way I'll use it.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #168 on: June 02, 2003, 11:29:30 pm »
Note to self:

The FX phasers on the Lyran BBs are actually KFX. (Klingon FX boom arc)
Needs correction/review.

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #169 on: June 05, 2003, 09:11:20 am »
The next ADB Captain's Log (#26) is due to ship June 25. Here are a couple pertinent paragraphs on the contents:

Quote:

New ships include the Federation GVX, heavy fighter pod, and scout pod; the Klingon heavy fighter resupply pod, PF transport pod, a medium hangar pod; the Kzinti CDX, scout pod, heavy fighter resupply pod, and PF transport pod; the Gorn scout pod, heavy fighter resupply pod, and PF transport pod; the Tholian heavy fighter resupply pack; the Hydran Boar Hunter commando DW, advanced fighter resupply ship, heavy fighter resupply pallet, and PT transport pallet; Lyran scout pod, heavy fighter resupply pod and pallet, PF transport pod and pallet.
...
Battle Group 900 focuses on a published scenario. Anarchist covers Seltorian-vs-Tholian with four SSDs, a complete master ship chart covers all ships published in previous Captain?s Logs, the Klingon Legal System is described in frightening detail.


« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by jdmckinney »

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #170 on: June 05, 2003, 09:29:09 am »
However ...

I just realized CL26 is NOT the only new product available June 25. Module R10: The New Cruisers is absolutely essential! Check it out:

Quote:

They said it would never be done, but here it is! Module R10 includes variants of the New Heavy Cruisers, giving all of those War Cruiser Variants increased combat power and survival. There are 79 new ships including:
- Federation New Command Cruiser, New Strike Carrier, New Fast Cruiser, New Drone Cruiser, New Survey Cruiser, New Division Control Ship, New Cruiser Leader, New Heavy Fighter Carrier, New Heavy Scout, New Aegis Escort
- Klingon New Heavy Cruiser Leader, New Strike Carrier, New Fast Heavy Cruiser, New Drone Bombardment Cruiser, New Survey Cruiser, New Fast Patrol Tender, New Division Control Ship, New Penal Cruiser, New Heavy Scout Cruiser, New Diplomatic Cruiser, New Escort Cruiser, New Mauler Cruiser, New Commando Cruiser, New Drone Cruiser, and New Stasis Cruiser
- Romulan FireHawk-B carrier, Firehawk-E PF tender, FireHawk-S Scout, RegalHawk-B carrier, RegalHawk-E PF tender, RegalHawk-C Scout, FlameHawk-P true mauler, New Heavy KR, New Heavy KR Scout, New Heavy KR Carrier
- Kzinti New Command Cruiser, New Strike Carrier, New Fast Cruiser, New Scout Cruiser, New Command Cruiser, New Drone Cruiser, New Survey Cruiser, Heavy PF Tender, New Division Control Ship, New Escort Cruiser
- Gorn Fast Medium Cruiser, Medium Survey Cruiser, Medium Fast Patrol Tender, Medium Commando Cruiser, Medium Division Control Ship, Medium Carrier, Medium Scout Cruiser, Heavy Destroyer Dreadnought
- Tholian New Heavy Cruiser and New Photon Cruiser
- Orion Heavy Battle Carrier and Heavy Battle PF Tender
- Hydran New Command Cruisers, New Medium Carrier, New Fast Cruiser, New Survey Cruiser, Medium PF Tender, Division Control Ship, New Tug, Heavy Escort Cruiser, Heavy Scout Carrier
- Andromedan Conqueror (their only three-engined ship!)
- Lyran New Command Cruiser, New Fast Cruiser, New Survey Cruiser, New Heavy PF Tender, New Division Control Ship, and New Mauler Cruiser
- ISC New Heavy Cruiser and New Strike Cruiser
- LDR New Command Cruiser and New Strike Carrier
- Seltorian New Heavy Cruiser and New Strike Carrier
Also included are counters and scenarios.



« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by jdmckinney »

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #171 on: June 05, 2003, 09:32:31 am »
yes, R10 is indeed essential. However, I don't know if I have that cash to spare.  Same goes for J2 which I haven't seen in my town yet.. .. in fact I don't know if I'll add ships from J2 yet.


.. as for copying ships from Captain's Logs.. well.. there's a good reason why I don't do it often: the SSDs given don't cover all races. Because of balance, when a type of ship is released, I want to be able to add all of the race's variants of this ship.

The only exception I have made was to use CL #16's X1 Drone Bombardment ships.



-- Luc
« Last Edit: June 05, 2003, 09:33:40 am by FireSoul »

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #172 on: June 05, 2003, 09:34:33 am »
That CDX should fill the X-bombardment void for the Kzinti. As for the cash, well I've already preordered my copies of both, so if you need some stats...

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #173 on: June 05, 2003, 09:36:10 am »
I need more than stats.. I need to _own_ them. I think I'll borrow from strafer or something.
-- Luc

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #174 on: June 05, 2003, 09:46:32 am »
I know how you feel.

I'm just glad I stumbled upon these at the ADB site. I never buy from shops, because the only one nearby doesn't stock the new stuff reliably. I order everything from ADB, and I've never had a problem getting what I want. Anyway, R10 is a BIG DEAL. I wasn't expecting it to be the next major release, so it's a bit of a surprise.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #175 on: June 05, 2003, 09:47:36 am »
Where can I find the preorder link for R10?
-- Luc

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #176 on: June 05, 2003, 11:05:39 am »
Main site for ADB's online sales: http://www.starfleetstore.com/

Direct link to R10 page: Module R10: The New Cruisers

Direct link to CL26 page: Captain's Log 26
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by jdmckinney »

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #177 on: June 05, 2003, 12:18:47 pm »
The Z-CCX2 is way way WAY over the top.
6 gatlings, 4 MIRVs 57 power which means it goes speed 31 and Overloads the 4 dizzies all the time..

Things I can do:
1- "R" designation. I don't want that thing on the D2. Ever.
2- Shipedit itself says that it's 20 BPV *UNDER*priced. .. and that's at LEAST.

.. that ship has no place in the shiplist..why I never noticed it before, nor looked at it closely, I am not sure. But KOTH and KAT be damned, that ship isn't staying as-is. I need opinions.

-- Luc

jdmckinney

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #178 on: June 05, 2003, 12:24:57 pm »
Without looking closely, I'd say no non-Hydran ship should get 6 gatlings. Also, 4 MIRVs seems excessive. If that were 2 MIRVs and 2 Bs, it would still be plenty of drones in the air (does it have other drones as well?). The power curve is tricky. It seems the Taldren default was perhaps not as far off on power as some thought (myself included). Maybe stepping it down by a couple power boxes at a time and testing on GSA would help to find a sweet spot.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ corrections thread
« Reply #179 on: June 05, 2003, 12:26:09 pm »
The D5XD is overpriced. It's currently at 214BPV..
.. based on data, it should come down to maybe .. 190? .. -25BPV. 189 BPV sounds ok?
.. compare with the K-D5D.. it is only at 116 BPV.


Other comparaison:

K-D5L:  133
K-D5X:  197.

It sounds about right from gameplay perspective too.

-- Luc