Topic: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE  (Read 10376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« on: April 01, 2003, 02:15:56 pm »
Well, fellow Alliance members, DOE is looking bad for us. The Feds in particular are having a tough time of it, and it seems like I'm the only one on the server at times. So, we need to do something fast, we only have a few days left.
So, I'm going to make the supreme sacrifice and offer a reward for any Fed or Gorn player that reaches 100,000 prestige by the end of the campaign. For one night only, I will spend the evening with the lucky Fed or Gorn, on a borrowed friend's webcam, wearing just my birthday suit. Yes, thats right, I'll do a strip, right down to nothing, for any Fed that can reach 100,000 prestige by the end of the campaign. And whatever happens afer that, well, it depends on my mood...
So get on the server and start fighting for the Alliance!! This is a one time offer only (and its just for one night by the way, coz I'm that kind of girl).
 

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2003, 02:18:28 pm »






















You didn't think I was serious, did you??  

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2003, 02:24:41 pm »
also known as, "What happens when the evilness of NW is combined with the penchant for bastardly behavior of J'inn, with the sense to make everyone on the forums think she's got the body of Angelina Jolie"

I bow before your greatness, oh Master Bastard!!! lol


Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2003, 02:42:20 pm »
I'll do one better......I am going to spend one night naked on a webcam with every fed or gorn that has an account already and doesn't reach 100K.

Kroma,

PS, Romulus here we come.

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2003, 02:47:40 pm »
Quote:

also known as, "What happens when the evilness of NW is combined with the penchant for bastardly behavior of J'inn, with the sense to make everyone on the forums think she's got the body of Angelina Jolie"

I bow before your greatness, oh Master Bastard!!! lol

 




That's Mistress Bitch, thankyou, get it right!!

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2003, 03:09:03 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

also known as, "What happens when the evilness of NW is combined with the penchant for bastardly behavior of J'inn, with the sense to make everyone on the forums think she's got the body of Angelina Jolie"

I bow before your greatness, oh Master Bastard!!! lol

 




That's Mistress Bitch, thankyou, get it right!!  




my bad lol   I stand corrected

SghnDubh

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2003, 03:20:28 pm »
Quote:

  For one night only, I will spend the evening with the lucky Fed or Gorn, on a borrowed friend's webcam, wearing just my birthday suit. Yes, thats right, I'll do a strip, right down to nothing, for any Fed that can reach 100,000 prestige by the end of the campaign.  





Where the   hell did I put that OP CD?  

Scipio_66

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2003, 05:19:29 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

  For one night only, I will spend the evening with the lucky Fed or Gorn, on a borrowed friend's webcam, wearing just my birthday suit. Yes, thats right, I'll do a strip, right down to nothing, for any Fed that can reach 100,000 prestige by the end of the campaign.  





Where the   hell did I put that OP CD?  




No need to search!  It's an EAW campaign!  And the Feds have some really cool ships.  (At least I think so.)

I can help with the offer here.  I can't post naked pictures of female D2 denizens, but I *do* have a photograph of J'inn passed out on a park bench, lightly covered in snow.  (And no I don't mean a jpg of a kitten I pulled from the web.  I took it on one of the nights we went drinking together.  He knows the shot I mean.)  I can e-mail it to any Fed who earns 100,000 by the end of the server.

-S'Cipio of the Shameless Bribery

TOCXOBearslayer

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2003, 05:31:36 pm »
April Fool's Day, eh?  To be honest... my jaw dropped... then I got to this.....

Quote:

You didn't think I was serious, did you??  




But I will be on anyways.

J'inn

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2003, 05:50:11 pm »
Quote:


I can help with the offer here.  I can't post naked pictures of female D2 denizens, but I *do* have a photograph of J'inn passed out on a park bench, lightly covered in snow.  (And no I don't mean a jpg of a kitten I pulled from the web.  I took it on one of the nights we went drinking together.  He knows the shot I mean.)  I can e-mail it to any Fed who earns 100,000 by the end of the server.

-S'Cipio of the Shameless Bribery  





Somehow I knew this day would come.  

<gets out checkbook>

How much for the pics Lizardbreath?

And I was not passed out!  I was resting!!

 

Gumby

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #10 on: April 01, 2003, 05:57:24 pm »
Quote:

Well, fellow Alliance members, DOE is looking bad for us. The Feds in particular are having a tough time of it, and it seems like I'm the only one on the server at times. So, we need to do something fast, we only have a few days left.
So, I'm going to make the supreme sacrifice and offer a reward for any Fed or Gorn player that reaches 100,000 prestige by the end of the campaign. For one night only, I will spend the evening with the lucky Fed or Gorn, on a borrowed friend's webcam, wearing just my birthday suit. Yes, thats right, I'll do a strip, right down to nothing, for any Fed that can reach 100,000 prestige by the end of the campaign. And whatever happens afer that, well, it depends on my mood...
So get on the server and start fighting for the Alliance!! This is a one time offer only (and its just for one night by the way, coz I'm that kind of girl).
 




 If were gonna go this far, why dont we have all the  webcams going at the same time, make it a group thing.............  Well, i was gonna switch sides, but now I'm to scared to.....

Besides, i doubt it's April 1st in OZ now anyways.....
 
 

Soreyes

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2003, 06:04:24 pm »
Quote:

I'll do one better......I am going to spend one night naked on a webcam with every fed or gorn that has an account already and doesn't reach 100K.

Kroma,

PS, Romulus here we come.  





OMG I'm in for it now. I'm so bad at flying Gorn, The Rom AI FFs are kicking my behind.

I want my APA

SghnDubh

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #12 on: April 01, 2003, 06:06:46 pm »
Quote:

 [No need to search!  It's an EAW campaign!  (snip)

-S'Cipio of the Shameless Bribery  




DOH!
Gawd, that's gonna take even more diggin' ...

TOCXOBearslayer

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #13 on: April 01, 2003, 07:03:53 pm »
Figures... I get on and guess who is NOT on?  

TraceyG........

FatherTed

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2003, 07:09:05 pm »
Do all these great offers apply to Feds who happen to be flying Bruce for this campaign?    

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2003, 08:15:58 pm »
And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2003, 08:52:57 pm »
Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




huh?

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2003, 09:24:31 pm »
Would TraceyG strip in front of another female if they had won??

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2003, 09:34:01 pm »
ohhh I get it......

<borrows the Rolling Pin>
BASH
<out icky thoughts.. out!!!>
ow.... where am I?
THUD

Scipio_66

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2003, 10:53:08 pm »
Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Don't worry, KRolling, just remember S'Cipio's first rule of the internet:  All "women" you meet are really 45 year-old men with hairy backs and a beer gut.  (Except for your charming self, of course.)  I hope this new image of Tracey makes you feel better about your prospects of winning the prize.

-S'Cipio

PS:  Is that your real picture in your new avatar with the rolling pin?  Cool!

Gumby

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2003, 11:41:59 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Don't worry, KRolling, just remember S'Cipio's first rule of the internet:  All "women" you meet are really 45 year-old men with hairy backs and a beer gut.  (Except for your charming self, of course.)  I hope this new image of Tracey makes you feel better about your prospects of winning the prize.

-S'Cipio

PS:  Is that your real picture in your new avatar with the rolling pin?  Cool!  





 -S'Cipio, looks like youd better plug in those multifaceted eyes of yours.........  Your p.s. shatters your whole concept of the 45 yearold guy with a beer gut, hairy back, and a rolling pin.............

 
   

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2003, 01:39:38 am »
Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Ummm, but Kim, I thought we agreed not to tell anyone about our chats on ICQ...  

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2003, 06:44:28 am »
Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Don't worry, KRolling, just remember S'Cipio's first rule of the internet:  All "women" you meet are really 45 year-old men with hairy backs and a beer gut.  (Except for your charming self, of course.)  I hope this new image of Tracey makes you feel better about your prospects of winning the prize.

-S'Cipio

PS:  Is that your real picture in your new avatar with the rolling pin?  Cool!  





LOL!! Funny S'cipio, and thanks!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by KRolling »

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2003, 06:47:56 am »
Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Ummm, but Kim, I thought we agreed not to tell anyone about our chats on ICQ...    





<snicker>

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #24 on: April 02, 2003, 06:52:42 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Ummm, but Kim, I thought we agreed not to tell anyone about our chats on ICQ...    





<snicker>  




Your avatar looks just how you look on webcam too... although, the one with the whip turned out better.

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2003, 06:59:10 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Ummm, but Kim, I thought we agreed not to tell anyone about our chats on ICQ...    





<snicker>  




Your avatar looks just how you look on webcam too... although, the one with the whip turned out better.  




So, you like the whip on better??? Hmmm.....  I thought it made my nose look too big.

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #26 on: April 02, 2003, 07:06:41 am »
We must do something about your dress sense too, Kim. White does suit you though, but I can see I'm going to have to take you clothes shopping. Now where did I put that Federation lingerie catalogue...

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #27 on: April 02, 2003, 09:12:46 am »
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. It so appears that the Feds are being hunted like poor little deers out of existence.

Well, enough of that.  I am here to turn all this Fed mush into muscle.  My name is Lord el-Karnak.  That's Karnak to you Fed weaklings. I have been brought here as an ISC advisor to the Fed war effort. Now, you are going get off you butts right now and fight.  You are going to stick it to those lying, no-good, double-dealing greenie weenie Rommies.  We are not going to go lingerie shopping.  We are not going to do anymore social chit chats.  We are not going to do anymore more moaning and groaning about how the missions are so hard.  You are going to get into that captain's chair and if that lousy slacker of an engineer of yours does not have your photons and warp engines at 110% efficiency I am going to personnally rub him out.  We are not going to have all this wasteful "innocent before proven guilty" crap form of Starfleet justice.  You either perform or you are taking a walk out of the airlock to "take one big leap for mankind" without a spacesuit.  You are going take that ship of yours and put some black streaks from enemy fire on the oh-to-clean angel white hull of yours.  I want to see you on that Rommie's tail at range 4 with over-loaded photons and ram those magic photon where they belong. Right up that pathetic Rommie's butt.  And, another thing you are all gonna operate as a team and focus on the appropriate part of space that your leaders tell you too. I don't want to see anyone doing his own little shopping spree far away from the attack point. I want to see DVs falling in droves in one hex not 10 or 20.  I want to see 10 DV shifts in a hex per half hour.  We are not going to win by having our poor bastards dying for our cause. We are going to win by making those Rommie bastards die for their cause and we are going make that Jinn bastard do a face-plant in every asteroid field we can find.

Any questions?

*shock and awe in the troops*

Except for dumb know-it-all recently graduated Starfleet Cadet.  "You are so full of..."

*zap with disrupter pistol and no more cadet*

"All right then. Dismissed."

Ps. I gotta finish my taxes for the ISC IRS but after that you are all dead, dead.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Karnak »

KBF-Dogmatix

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #28 on: April 02, 2003, 09:27:32 am »
Quote:







You didn't think I was serious, did you??  





Crap, Tracey...*I* was about to go fly my ass off in a Fed ship!!!  



 

Black

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #29 on: April 02, 2003, 10:56:55 am »
Quote:

Quote:

You didn't think I was serious, did you??  




Crap, Tracey...*I* was about to go fly my ass off in a Fed ship!!!    




Hey Doggey,

She does mean it!!! Get in that ship now! Go for it!  

<snicker>  


P.S. Geeez, that would be some incentive!
ummm, did I say that?
oops, shut up now! they can hear you!    

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #30 on: April 02, 2003, 01:55:51 pm »
Quote:

Crap, Tracey...*I* was about to go fly my ass off in a Fed ship!!!    




BAH! That would be like a T Bone steak to a rabid dog... :P  

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #31 on: April 02, 2003, 02:03:55 pm »
What are you all saying here? You mean you really want us ugly, cheating, "over populated, too many Feds", let's them leave, to really play with you all, I'm touched.

You like us again?

I will logon latter and see if this is true. Also, it might be nice if those who normally fly Fed were doing so. (hint)

Hooch  

TheMaverick

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #32 on: April 02, 2003, 02:38:02 pm »
Hey we never said that! We still hate you, you dirty cheating, swarming, monkeys! We just get bored with so little targets.

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #33 on: April 02, 2003, 03:36:27 pm »
Quote:

Hey we never said that! We still hate you, you dirty cheating, swarming, monkeys! We just get bored with so little targets.  




Hard to have a turkey shoot without the turkeys.

Mike H

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #34 on: April 02, 2003, 04:25:46 pm »
Quote:



You didn't think I was serious, did you??  




Aw, hell.  I think at least 95% of the Romulan navy would have defected for that!  

MH  

Remiak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #35 on: April 02, 2003, 05:21:02 pm »
Quote:

What are you all saying here? You mean you really want us ugly, cheating, "over populated, too many Feds", let's them leave, to really play with you all, I'm touched.

You like us again?

I will logon latter and see if this is true. Also, it might be nice if those who normally fly Fed were doing so. (hint)

Hooch    




Hooch, if you feel you may not make the 100K pp in time for Tracey's offer, here is what we can do on the last day:

1. You get the smallest Federation ship in the Fed yard
2. I get the smallest Rom ship in our yard
3. You draft me...I self destruct...thanks to Tracey's mission upgrade, you get a big bonus for a winning PvP
4. I get the same bottom of the line ship as replacment  and we rinse/repeat to number 3.
5. You quickly get the 100K pp and then get the video clip and share with your partner in crime...me

What say you? Seems perfectly legal to me....we can always ask Jinn's advise but he will want his copy of the video.

Remiak the helpfull.
   

Remiak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #36 on: April 02, 2003, 05:28:30 pm »
Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Kim, it seems to me that the value of something is not only the one you associate to the item but also the one people are willing to pay for it....in other words if you get the video clip just exchange it for something else that has value to you.

Might I interest you in the airport video of J'inn (I must warn you that some portion are not suitable for viewing by a young audiance) it is very funny. You should just see J'inn's face when the security guard....well you might just see for yourself.

Thanks
Remiak    
« Last Edit: April 02, 2003, 05:30:00 pm by Remiak »

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #37 on: April 02, 2003, 06:22:46 pm »
Quote:

Hey we never said that! We still hate you, you dirty cheating, swarming, monkeys! We just get bored with so little targets.  




<sniff> It's good to home  

BTW, I got whole mess of CRC errors, is there a new load in?

Hooch

(BTW, I am not a cheater, all the other names are fine )  

Scipio_66

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #38 on: April 02, 2003, 06:41:37 pm »
Quote:


BTW, I got whole mess of CRC errors, is there a new load in?

Hooch
 




The downloads on my web page ( http://www.fourpower.com/DOE_Frontpage.html ) are current.  They were placed there on Monday, March 31st and include Tracey's fixes to cap the maximum size opponents you face, my fix to Fed drogues and a few shiplist typos,  and Dave's fix to stop mandatory missions in allied space.

If you are starting fresh and new, you'll need the DOEConvert1.zip and the DOECOnvert2.zip downloads.  If you have played DOE with an older version, you should only need the DOEMissions.zip download.  If your downloads are up-to-date, then here are some common problems people have had:

1) Be sure you place your EagleConvert folder inside the C:/Program Files/Taldren/ Starfleet Command II (Or D: if you installed on the D drive, or whatever.)
2) Make sure you press the unzip button when using Winzip; don't drag and drop manually.  (You'll destroy the subdirectory structure.)
3) Make sure you unzip both DOEConvert1.zip and DOEConvert2.zip into EagleConverter.
4) Don't move the scripts ToEagle and FromEagle out of the EagleConverter folder; they need EagleConverter to be their home in order to work properly.  Place shortcuts on your desktop instead if you want a desktop icon.

Yell if it still doesn't work for you.

-S'Cipio  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Scipio_66 »

Gumby

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #39 on: April 02, 2003, 06:53:08 pm »
 Gosh Tracy, bet you never thought a simple little April Fools gag would generate so much interest did ya..............  But then again, most of us are degenerate men...... (males sorry)

 
 

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #40 on: April 02, 2003, 07:30:32 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Kim, it seems to me that the value of something is not only the one you associate to the item but also the one people are willing to pay for it....in other words if you get the video clip just exchange it for something else that has value to you.

Might I interest you in the airport video of J'inn (I must warn you that some portion are not suitable for viewing by a young audiance) it is very funny. You should just see J'inn's face when the security guard....well you might just see for yourself.

Thanks
Remiak    




Ah, you talk like a Ferengi!!!!

TheMaverick

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #41 on: April 03, 2003, 01:03:16 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Hey we never said that! We still hate you, you dirty cheating, swarming, monkeys! We just get bored with so little targets.  




<sniff> It's good to home  

BTW, I got whole mess of CRC errors, is there a new load in?

Hooch

(BTW, I am not a cheater, all the other names are fine )  




Ok ok... Fine your just dirty then =)

Edit: When were you last on the server it could be possible there is a new pack. Just keep checking Scippy's website.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2003, 01:06:05 am by TheMaverick »

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #42 on: April 03, 2003, 09:20:59 am »
IMHO, I don't think there is anything anyone can do to entice more players to DOE until there is a fundamental change in mission script design philosophy.  

Basically, the AI is overdone effectively shutting out newbie, rusty and not-so-good players from the game.  I don't blame many  players from staying away.  The special missions are taking way too long and pop up too frequently.  They should be restricted to neutral hexes or just home hexes or just enemy hexes.  Or, a combination of the above two on the above three.   In my experience, people only want to do long missions (ie. plus 8 minutes) for PvP. If it's against an AI many players may get agitated cuz they think their time is better spent looking for PvP fights which is the most popular reason for playing SFC2 in the first place.  In addition, over-long AI-only missions hamper the abilitly to implement proper dyna strategic play cuz it takes way too long to flip a hex relative to IDSL and AOTK.  In effect, strategic play is neutered.  Compared to IDSL which had similar opening numbers to DOE, there was 10 ten times the mobility in terms of hex munching in the same space of time.
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Karnak »

Mog

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #43 on: April 03, 2003, 10:06:38 am »
Somewhere in the .gf files is a setting to allow many more mission options available to players. At least I've seen that in OP, not so sure about EAW. I haven't looked at EAW .gf files since I did The Aurora Continuum's server, back in the early days. Now if this can be found in the EAW files, and used, players could be offered anywhere from 1 to at least 4 different mission options.

As to what Karnak and J'inn have said above, I also tend to agree. I think my opinions on ai missions are fairly well known by now I'm definitely in the PvP camp, and I view missions (especially those that take a while) against the ai to be almost a waste of my time, whereas a long one against a player or players I find extremely fun (and if it's an enemy heavy unit that i'm engaging, worthwhile strategically  too).

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #44 on: April 03, 2003, 02:25:32 pm »
There is a setting in the gf files to offer more missions than just 2 at a time. I'm told though, the game crash if you set this higher than 2 however. It would be nice if we could though.
Now, about these missions, which ones on DOE were considered to be too difficult? Which ones should be considered for a high turnout campaign, and what is an acceptable mission time? On IDSL, all I heard was that missions were too quick... run in, alpha strike, finish off the AI, done in 2 mins (less if you were a Mirak). Now, missions are taking too long?
The variety of skill levels you will find in people playing in a campaign are very spread out. We just can't please everyone. Making a 'medium' difficulty mission is probably the best of the both worlds, but even still, there will always be some players who can do those missions quicker than others. There will always be some players who find even the simplest of missions difficult, and others who just arent challenged by even the difficult missions. So, if then, we aim to cater for the lowest common denominator, with the view to promoting PvP, we could do it with just 3 missions: a patrol, a base assault and a planet assault, thats all you need for the strategic aspects of the game.... LOL!!! It would also be very boring as well. So perhaps we should ask everyone what kind of missions would they like to see in a campaign. Perhaps even try running two servers at once for a single campaign, the easy server, and the 'specialised' server with VC's being combined, I'm sure this has been suggested before.

What I really think though, is that a mission pack for any one campign should be synergistic, a collection of missions that are consistent with respect to each other in regard to prestige payout, difficulty levels (including AI and any strategic theme as part of thie mission), AI matching, and where and how often a mission appears.

klink

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #45 on: April 03, 2003, 02:49:46 pm »
maybe my perspective as a newbie could be of value. the last starfleet commander-type Star Trek game i played prior to this was in EGA. the theme and interface is where the similarities stop.

The AI is tough, but not so tough that its Impossible. their conservative nature, makes for some long battles, and romulan's can regen their shields FAST... well atleast faster than I've figured out how to do in my starter federation frigate. I've got no PP so, imagine losing every mission and getting a brand new ship then trying to take on a romulan frigate 1v1. with the doubleshot bug, this makes for some wild dancing. especially trying to balance power to stay 10 ahead of the plasma, have shield power to keep the phasers from doing any hull damage, and keep weapon systems online. usually i'm turning phasers on and off to keep engine speed up.

as the double shot plasma will obliterate my systems in one pass (usually accompanied by a multiple mine problem to try and escape from), that leaves me with the high energy turn, fire and run tactic as my only real viable option. i've been trying to get this down, spike the sensor power, and try to get the ship to 'even out' before unleashing the photons. i think this is probably a pretty generic fed strategy against the AI. a couple more tricks i've tried, loading the 1 SH i have with one of those scatter pack things and dropping the 3 mines i have. these are just gimmicks and have never won the battle for me.

anyways, i usually do this act for about 10 mins, with mixed levels of succes. this success has not translated into a 'successfull mission', the result of the encounter, so far, has always been either me running to the warp line or being sucked out the hull into space.

i've not blamed the missions, i think that if i hadn't blown my PP wad on trying to secure a wingman frigate, i could resupply myself and atleast afford some decent missiles and/or fighters for the starter frigate, which would've given me the edge i need in these 1v1 AlliedpatrolB's.

anyways, DOE hasn't chased me away, i've learned ALOT and had fun doing it, despite the 0 pp. the one encounter i had with a human Romulan (Convoy Raid mission) was a blast. I didn't realize he was not an ally until the firing started as it seemed we started within 30 of each other and it was my first time doing thsi mission. i engaged very briefly so that i could get some space between us and make a clean escape, the tactic worked, i tried to just widen the gap a little by firing off some space turtles with red warheads strapped to their back... atleast i think thats what those slowass red things are that come out of my ship.  

wow, long post.

Kel

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #46 on: April 03, 2003, 03:26:42 pm »
Quote:

There is a setting in the gf files to offer more missions than just 2 at a time. I'm told though, the game crash if you set this higher than 2 however. It would be nice if we could though.
Now, about these missions, which ones on DOE were considered to be too difficult? Which ones should be considered for a high turnout campaign, and what is an acceptable mission time? On IDSL, all I heard was that missions were too quick... run in, alpha strike, finish off the AI, done in 2 mins (less if you were a Mirak). Now, missions are taking too long?
The variety of skill levels you will find in people playing in a campaign are very spread out. We just can't please everyone. Making a 'medium' difficulty mission is probably the best of the both worlds, but even still, there will always be some players who can do those missions quicker than others. There will always be some players who find even the simplest of missions difficult, and others who just arent challenged by even the difficult missions. So, if then, we aim to cater for the lowest common denominator, with the view to promoting PvP, we could do it with just 3 missions: a patrol, a base assault and a planet assault, thats all you need for the strategic aspects of the game.... LOL!!! It would also be very boring as well. So perhaps we should ask everyone what kind of missions would they like to see in a campaign. Perhaps even try running two servers at once for a single campaign, the easy server, and the 'specialised' server with VC's being combined, I'm sure this has been suggested before.

What I really think though, is that a mission pack for any one campign should be synergistic, a collection of missions that are consistent with respect to each other in regard to prestige payout, difficulty levels (including AI and any strategic theme as part of thie mission), AI matching, and where and how often a mission appears.  





I thought you did a good job of addressing this with the two type of patrols... AlliedPatrol A/B, NeutralPatrol A/B, etc.  The 'A' patrol is like the standard Taldren patrol...1 vs 1 with an enemy ship generally equal to or smaller than you.  The mission time for victory should be in the 2-5 minute range for an average player with a modest pp payout for a kill and slightly more for a capture.    

The 'B' patrol was a fleet action...much more challenging leading to longer mission times, but a greater pp payout for kills and even more for captures.  

Players could choose the B variant when needing pp and the A variant when required to flip hexes quickly.  I have seen both of these missions offered in the same hex many times, but not often enough in my opinion.  If we could somehow get both the A and B to appear at the same time, then it would go a long way to appeasing the veteran looking for challange and the newbie looking to survive.  The key is giving players both options consistently in most hexes, along with a 'specialty' mission like prisoner escort, courier intercept or convoy raid occasionally to add some flavor.  

The extra pp payout for a human kill also does a good job of promoting/rewarding PvP.  Those veteran players looking for more PvP could choose the quick 'A' variant to get through the mandatory AI while other players could opt for the 'B' variant.  

If you stop and think about the DOE missions and HOW they could be better implemented instead of ACTUAL implementation, I think we are very close to the mystical balance we all hope to achieve.    

Just my 0.02 worth.

GDA-Kel
Gorn Dragon Alliance
 

FatherTed

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #47 on: April 03, 2003, 03:39:13 pm »
Please dump the Courier mission. It's a royal pain in the arse.  

J'inn

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #48 on: April 03, 2003, 04:02:29 pm »
I would say that for a campaign set up that requires a large turn out you need to have a missions mix which is slightly easier than the DOE group.   Perhaps just some tweaks, see below.  Certainly some fo the Vets will get a little bored at times, but they are mostly there for PvP anyways.  Also, even if they find it a little easy (not too easy mind you) they will still play.

If it is at harder than DOE levels,  new players will find it too hard, and here's the key point,  they won't play at all.  

Too Hard:   sucks

Hard:  Fun for the Vets but makes it unplayable for newer or those not so goods "ahem"

Moderate:  Fun for most all.   Some super vets find it easy.  Some pure newbies still can't play.

Easy:   Vets find it mostly easy.  However all players are able to play.  Vets lean more to PvP and the overall strategic picture as opposed to the easy for them tactical picture.

Too Easy:   Dullsville.


So for the large campaign you have two practical choices IMHO:

1)  Somehow get the missions to show up well mixed AND have the PP payout correctly.

or

2)  Set it up for "easy" level.  

For example:

CW 1  -  CW 6 would all have been "Easy" level due to the mission scripts.  (Stock Taldren)  They all had large turnouts.   Yes, we had more players then but the point is everyone could play and have fun.

AoTK was all over the board.

4 powers -  Hard to Too hard.

DOE - Moderate

Also IMHO,   D2 is about overall strategic play.   The tactical battles (AI or PvP) are just a small part of the larger picture.   Now the tactical part has to be fun and interesting.  But if you focus too much challage on the tactical part you overwhelm the strategic part.  

Players want to be able to log on and feel they have accomplished something within at most an hour.  

This gets to missions times.   Which I consider completely different from mission difficulty.

I think DOE is fine.   People are just in shock at how slow it is to fly a plasma boat.   I imagine a lot of snickering coming from the Rom and Gorn vets.

As for the DOE missions.   I think Tracey's are fine in all respects.   Dave's add flavor and I like that.  However due to the number of AI you face in his missions both difficulty and mission time go up.   I'd like to keep them and have the PP payoff jacked up a ton.

That way people can choose.     However, that gets back to setting them up so that one mission doesn't appear 90% of the time.  Right now the courier mission is popping up as the only choice a lot.  That creates a real problem in mission balance.


As with most things,  it is very complicated.   There is no single right answer.  

Everyone should say thank you to those that write missions and set up servers.   It's a convoluted nightmare.

After you say thanks, you can kick them.  <snicker>

 

Mike H

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #49 on: April 03, 2003, 04:23:30 pm »
Now that the "rust" is diminishing, I do find most of the missions quite challenging, although there are a few that are just way over the top.  I don't like missions that require some kind of "trick" in lieu of solid tactics, and I think there are a couple missions on DOE that fall under that category.

While I like the challenging missions, I think PP payoff leaves a bit to be desired.  If this campaign were going to run for, say a year for example, then I'd say fine.  That would give the average player enough time to work his/her way up to a top-notch ship.  Is this campaign going to run that long??  If the answer is no, then the average player is going to get disinterested really quick.  The average player can't spend the 8 hours a day necessary to get a heavy or dread in a reasonable amount of time (week or two?).  I can put in a few hours at a time, 3 or maybe 4 days a week.  At that rate, I will have a garbage scow by year's end!

Again, if I knew the campaign was going to run a LONG time or roll into another episode (with PP carried over), then I am fine with the way it is.  Otherwise, some tweaks are needed.  

Cheers,
Mike
 

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #50 on: April 03, 2003, 05:21:39 pm »
Quote:


So for the large campaign you have two practical choices IMHO:

1)  Somehow get the missions to show up well mixed AND have the PP payout correctly.

or

2)  Set it up for "easy" level.  





I don't think there is anyway to make the missions well-mixed other than cloning the more popular mission entries in the campaign's MCT file which is more an art than an empirical science.  Ergo, fuhget about trying get a proper mix.  What I can do for ISC Inv. is restrict the hard missions to certain hexes.  One idea I am tossing around is to keep special missions largely restricted to Neutral hexes so as the campaign ages you will see less and less of them in the contested war zones.  If you really like them you can go find yerself some neutral hexes and munch on them.

Quote:


Also IMHO,   D2 is about overall strategic play.   The tactical battles (AI or PvP) are just a small part of the larger picture.   Now the tactical part has to be fun and interesting.  But if you focus too much challage on the tactical part you overwhelm the strategic part.

Players want to be able to log on and feel they have accomplished something within at most an hour.  

This gets to missions times.   Which I consider completely different from mission difficulty.





Agreed.  Some basic patrols that don't go over 5 minutes for the average players should help there.  

Quote:


I think DOE is fine.   People are just in shock at how slow it is to fly a plasma boat.   I imagine a lot of snickering coming from the Rom and Gorn vets.





Frogs are snickering too.  The concept of the PF cruiser like the I-BCV, G-BCHV, R-THV goes a long way to simulating with their PFs, the no-power-cost drone look-a-likes to speed up the fight for plasma races.

Quote:


Everyone should say thank you to those that write missions and set up servers.   It's a convoluted nightmare.

After you say thanks, you can kick them.  <snicker>
 




Also, thank the modders and those people like Jinn that provide helpful feedback so that servers get progressively better.  

After for kicking me. I find that even though poeple are screaming at me they usually have some good reason behind all the rhetoric  that provides useful feedback on a dyna.  

So, scream away...  

Green

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #51 on: April 03, 2003, 05:43:30 pm »
Quote:

I Everyone should say thank you to those that write missions and set up servers.   It's a convoluted nightmare.  




Thank you.

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #52 on: April 03, 2003, 07:22:46 pm »
Ok, so if we get the 'standard' patrols to show up more often, with a sprinkling of specialty missions just for interests sake, we might get something work?

By the way, despite being able to set a mission to only appear in neutral space within a script, its actually the server gf settings that largely determine where a mission will appear. Set them incorrectly and 'enemy' missions will appear in allied space. Also, as Dave will tell you as well, no one, BUT no one, has ever been able to get neutral missions to only appear in neutral space. On DOE, the NEutral patrols I wrote are written to only appear in neutral space, but as everyone has seen, they turn up anywhere. Thankfully, the allied space and enemy space settings within a mission script appear to work, provided you have the right gf settings.

There also appears to be a setting within the mission script that 'appears' (I use the word tentatively) to change the frequency or probability that a mission will appear. Typically for base assault and planet assault missions, this is set higher so that they appear on bases and planets instead of other missions.

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #53 on: April 03, 2003, 07:23:51 pm »
And to think this all started up as a April Fool's thread... LOL!!

Remiak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #54 on: April 03, 2003, 07:41:44 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Kim, it seems to me that the value of something is not only the one you associate to the item but also the one people are willing to pay for it....in other words if you get the video clip just exchange it for something else that has value to you.

Might I interest you in the airport video of J'inn (I must warn you that some portion are not suitable for viewing by a young audiance) it is very funny. You should just see J'inn's face when the security guard....well you might just see for yourself.

Thanks
Remiak    




Ah, you talk like a Ferengi!!!!  




LOL, I though the same thing as I was writting those lines. I think the Ferengis are fun. Hoped the comment was somewhat funny as well. Anyways, it is now time to go for my haircut.

Remiak sits on the Barber's chair, everyone knows that Romulan barbers are not choosen for the skills in cutting hair but for their their ability to obtain and dissimilate information.
Remiak> "So did you analyse the picture I gave you in my last appointment?"
barber looking uncomfortable> "Yes, we did.
Remiak>"So tell me, what is she holding in her hand?"
barber> "According to our sources, It is the equivalent of a hand held Mauler...very short range...very messy. It seems she intends to arm the boarding parties of the SSCF Integritus with these."
Remiak remained calm, trying to consider the tactical implications of the introduction of such weapon.
The barber was hesitating, but when prompted, continued: "We have reasons to beleive that if the trials on the Integritus are sucessfull, the Gorns will cite their technology exchange treaty with the Federation and request the blueprints"
Remiak was having shivers in his back at the thought of a dozen Gorn marines boarding his bridge suited in Korma's battledress armed with hand held mauler.....
Remiak> "Just when one thinks, war as brought enough attrocities, things like these come up to prove that more insanity is still possible by so-called civilized beings. This boarders psychlogical warfare!!!"
 
Remiak left the barbershop hoping that the day of the eagle would find its dusk before such weapons could be deployed in a large scale.


Sorry if I continue the joke in this thread. After the day I just had, a little humour was welcomed.

On the serious side of this thread:

IMO the failure to make the plasma carriers work well in DOE while they were intended to replace a fair portion of the ships in our yards make the possible selection very restrictive. We basically play the same few ships.
Adding to that the mission mixte and lack of variety makes a situation where one tends to play the same ship in the same mission over and over.
I agree that The missions difficulty does not help to keep players interested. When playing Roms the gorn are not to be dealt with easily in a fast mission. So some players may find these long and less fun.
At least the Roms can fight the Feds or Gorn for a needed change once in a while. Feds and Gorn did not have a second front to bring in a little variety.

A positive point in favor of balance, neither side has any fast hex flippers.
   
Thanks
Remiak  
« Last Edit: April 03, 2003, 07:44:18 pm by Remiak »

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #55 on: April 03, 2003, 07:51:47 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

And what would you do if it was another girl???

I mean a straight one???

ACK!!! No offence, but ACK!!!!  




Kim, it seems to me that the value of something is not only the one you associate to the item but also the one people are willing to pay for it....in other words if you get the video clip just exchange it for something else that has value to you.

Might I interest you in the airport video of J'inn (I must warn you that some portion are not suitable for viewing by a young audiance) it is very funny. You should just see J'inn's face when the security guard....well you might just see for yourself.

Thanks
Remiak    




Ah, you talk like a Ferengi!!!!  




LOL, I though the same thing as I was writting those lines. I think the Ferengis are fun. Hoped the comment was somewhat funny as well. Anyways, it is now time to go for my haircut.

Remiak sits on the Barber's chair, everyone knows that Romulan barbers are not choosen for the skills in cutting hair but for their their ability to obtain and dissimilate information.
Remiak> "So did you analyse the picture I gave you in my last appointment?"
barber looking uncomfortable> "Yes, we did.
Remiak>"So tell me, what is she holding in her hand?"
barber> "According to our sources, It is the equivalent of a hand held Mauler...very short range...very messy. It seems she intends to arm the boarding parties of the SSCF Integritus with these."
Remiak remained calm, trying to consider the tactical implications of the introduction of such weapon.
The barber was hesitating, but when prompted, continued: "We have reasons to beleive that if the trials on the Integritus are sucessfull, the Gorns will cite their technology exchange treaty with the Federation and request the blueprints"
Remiak was having shivers in his back at the thought of a dozen Gorn marines boarding his bridge suited in Korma's battledress armed with hand held mauler.....
Remiak> "Just when one thinks, war as brought enough attrocities, things like these come up to prove that more insanity is still possible by so-called civilized beings. This boarders psychlogical warfare!!!"
 
Remiak left the barbershop hoping that the day of the eagle would find its dusk before such weapons could be deployed in a large scale.


Sorry if I continue the joke in this thread. After the day I just had, a little humour was welcomed.

On the serious side of this thread:

IMO the failure to make the plasma carriers work well in DOE while they were intended to replace a fair portion of the ships in our yards make the possible selection very restrictive. We basically play the same few ships.
Adding to that the mission mixte and lack of variety makes a situation where one tends to play the same ship in the same mission over and over.
I agree that The missions difficulty does not help to keep players interested. When playing Roms the gorn are not to be dealt with easily in a fast mission. So some players may find these long and less fun.
At least the Roms can fight the Feds or Gorn for a needed change once in a while. Feds and Gorn did not have a second front to bring in a little variety.

A positive point in favor of balance, neither side has any fast hex flippers.
   
Thanks
Remiak    




Don't you just love these "quote" buttons??

Funny story, Remiak!!! I just can't believe big the "Rolling Pin" has become!! Hehe!!

Who was it that started it in the first place?? I can't remember.

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #56 on: April 03, 2003, 08:50:00 pm »
Quote:

And to think this all started up as a April Fool's thread... LOL!!  




This is why Max calls me an evil, evil man....errr, Frog    

Things were getting a little boring in this forum.

*flips open calendar book and puts big check mark on week's To-Do list*

Next week, we can all scream about whether SFC3 with the beta patch is any better than SFC2.

Are y'all up for it?

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Karnak »

Fluf

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #57 on: April 04, 2003, 12:40:49 am »
I agree with you JInn 100%.  

Tracey's missions are fine so far except for the occasional imbalance.  Daves missions are tough, take too long and dont give enough PP for the fight, although I enjoy them.

I can tell you flying Rom for my first time in D2 makes me feel like a total newbie.  So I can understand where they come from and how they might react to coming onto a server like this.

Ive lost 16 ships, 5 to PvP and the rest to AI.  That is nuts.  I just got my glicko out of the negatives the other night and its around 500 now.  

Unfortunately, with the mission they way they are now, it doesnt lend to the strategic or tactical D2 I enjoy more.  Im like Jinn.  I want to log on for and hour or two and see what I've accomplished.  Flying Rom, that can mean a whole 2 to 4 missions sometimes, as they can last 30 mins, especially against a Gorn.  Yes I have flown a few 3 min missions. But they are rare.  I dont want to spend all my time doing missions to lower a hex by 2 to 4 DV in and hour.  I want to hex munch, make the enemy react and get in some PvP.  I have seen a battle on the Fed border for 3 hexes last 3 days now.  Not much strategy there.

Missions must be made enjoyable, and the hard ones should be made to reward the pilot with some good PP if he survives.

Oh, and dump the Courier Mission.  I have personally lost 6 ships to this mission, just trying to kill the courier and run.  All for a lousy 50PP.  Its the worst mission in the bunch and shows up more than 50% of the time.

SOS_Skorzeny

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #58 on: April 04, 2003, 01:15:45 am »
Quote:

 I want to log on for and hour or two and see what I've accomplished.  Flying Rom, that can mean a whole 2 to 4 missions sometimes, as they can last 30 mins, especially against a Gorn.




 Sounds like life-as-normal for a plasma boat on every server back to Artic.  The ISC are a little faster since they got more firepower.  But the Roms alwyas knnow what it is like to run slow missions up until they spend wads on a really big Dread or something.

At least I've gottne to enjoy my War Eagle to King Eagle this server.

*Skorzeny
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by SOS_Skorzeny »

Soreyes

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #59 on: April 04, 2003, 02:09:27 am »
I don't know Fluf. Im a compleat newbe as to flying Gorn. In fact at one point I was down to flying a FF Escort with only 98pp left. Then a little light went on in my head. I then started to fly and fight better. Now Im up to a G-DD+ with over 2000pp.

About the Courier missions.Well I have flown 4 of them. I won 2 and lost 2. In the one's I lost.I killed every thing but the Courier.I ended up losing 50pp per mission. (Hey when the Plasma hits the Fan tha Courier kinda gets lost )
The two that I won, I collected 300pp for each mission. On one of those missions I had a L-DWD as a AI wingman. Boy did that ship kick some Rom Butt

I forgot who it was out there flying the Rom DN. All I can say is I found you at one point. And  as the band "A Flock Of Seagulls" would sing.  "And I Ran, I Ran So Far Away"
« Last Edit: April 04, 2003, 02:12:11 am by Soreyes »

Mog

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #60 on: April 04, 2003, 02:59:32 am »
I've always been a supporter of flying different races whenever possible. It gives people insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the other races.  Now that people have tasted what it's like to be a plasma player, as opposed to say a drone race player, perhaps we can move closer to the understanding that the community has been trying to reach regarding mission times and BPV balance. Methinks Scip, your server has helped a lot in that regard - increasing BPV of carriers to account for fighters etc is a very good move imho, and should be done for all shiplists.

Another thing that has come out of this server is that it has shown people that flying the smaller ships can be fun (least I hope that's been shown hehe), and that small (non drone using) ships can be competitive in PvP.

The small amount of time that I've been able to spend on DOE has been entertaining, and for that I give you my thanks Scippy I even flew Fed for a bit myself, lost an NCL+ to Warsears and Fluf, but got some measure of revenge with the DDL soon after Sadly, I'm now getting CRC errors on missions and no matter what I try, cannot solve this problem. So, for me, it has come to an end. Good luck to both sides for the remainder of the campaign

Herr Burt

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #61 on: April 04, 2003, 03:16:40 am »
Quote:


Oh, and dump the Courier Mission.  I have personally lost 6 ships to this mission, just trying to kill the courier and run.  All for a lousy 50PP.  Its the worst mission in the bunch and shows up more than 50% of the time.  




If people want PP, then courier is the BEST way to get it.  If you run solo and capture the courier, you average around 800 PP per mission.

If you get a wingman and capture several ships, you can score huge.  These are my last two courier missions, performed in a Gorn CM.  My partner was Agave:

FIRST


SECOND


Additionally, Dave's new missions seem to be able to hold three of us on the same side quite easily.  I have never done that before in the D2.  Three of us in the courier mission is fun and easy.  But again, you can score 800 solo just by capturing the courier.  Every bit as big a payoff as the old Taldren Convoy Raid, and quite a bit more interesting.


-Herr Burt  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Herr Burt »

TOCXOBearslayer

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #62 on: April 04, 2003, 04:48:46 am »
LOL..... I don't mind the courier mission either.... just wish I had known you can capture the courier....

Heard on the voice comm some one lost the mission when the captured it.... I guess you need to capture it then SD it?

Also, PvP was a big time PP bonus.  I only had 4 this server.... first against one of the SPQR guys (in a HC) where I ran like a screaming child in my F-FFG   Second against Fluf (R-NHK?) with my F-BCF (I won that one, nanner-nanner-nanner).  Then that SneakyRom guy   in another NHK (we both disengaged after beating the snot out of each other). Then last night wtih Athena.  (another NHK heh-heh)  I only paid attention to the points gained against Fluf and the bonus was 1016 PP

Oh well.... anyways... Last night I squared off against SOS-Athena in her R-NHK.  Tough fight but I won in a sense since she left the field.  Luckily she wasn't the courier.  

Sides were fairly even if not a bit in her favor.  Courier was a WER.  Her wingmen were a WER & a SEB (fighter carrying thing)  while I had a BCF with wingmen of G-BC &  a Fed light cruiser (DWD IIRC)..... Unfortunately, the Rom   got away......

Anyways.... thanks for the server HB, wish I had more time to enjoy it... unfortunately, I had way too many other things to do.... and I am out of town as of 1600 EST today until late Sunday night.

So I will check you all on the flip side and the next server

J'inn

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #63 on: April 04, 2003, 06:31:41 am »
Quote:



If people want PP, then courier is the BEST way to get it.  If you run solo and capture the courier, you average around 800 PP per mission.  





That reminds me!!!     One other thing that needs to be fixed.    It very very hard for Roms to capture Gorn in this mission.   For some reason the courier seems to always have 30+ marines on board.    Your Rom ship has 3 transporters.    There is just no way.

I suppose one could fly a Rom Commando ship but I hate that.   Somehow many of the Gorn ships ended up with way too many marines on board.  Something to look at for the next campaign.

As for the Evil Dave missions.   I think they are fine.  They just need to pay out more in line with the work you have to do.   I win the courier mission most of the time.  It involves a tactic that I posted in my "How to Fly an Evil Dave Mission & Live to Talk About it Thread"

 

Matsukasi

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #64 on: April 04, 2003, 08:42:09 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Hey we never said that! We still hate you, you dirty cheating, swarming, monkeys! We just get bored with so little targets.  




<sniff> It's good to home  

BTW, I got whole mess of CRC errors, is there a new load in?

Hooch

(BTW, I am not a cheater, all the other names are fine )  




Well, you can add LYING to that list now...... < snicker >

It's a JOKE, people..... simmer down and have a donut.  

Herr Burt

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #65 on: April 04, 2003, 12:45:29 pm »
Quote:

LOL..... I don't mind the courier mission either.... just wish I had known you can capture the courier....

Heard on the voice comm some one lost the mission when the captured it.... I guess you need to capture it then SD it?




The courier will still try to exit the map after you capture it, but this doesn't affect your payoff or your win/loss result.

It's like the old Convoy Raid mission.  The freightors would blow up after you captured them, but you still got paid for having done so.

Note that the payoff for capturing ships in the courier mission is 120 points per ship, with an extra payoff of 400 if that ship is the courier.  So if you are solo, the courier turns out to be a commando ship, and you think you won't be able to wear it down before it crosses the border, you can still get a nice payday by simply killing the courier and then capturing a few of the other ships.  Use care of course, when trying to capture the support fleet.  As with any fleet action, keep your whole force engaged and don't get isolated.  Once you've killed/captured the courier, you've won the mission.  Should you ever mess up later, you can always withdraw safe in the knowledge that you will still get the DV shift in your favor.

-Herr Burt
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Herr Burt »

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #66 on: April 04, 2003, 02:12:39 pm »
Quote:

It's like the old Convoy Raid mission. The freightors would blow up after you captured them, but you still got paid for having done so.





That can be changed and I will do it.  The Convoy protector should have the option of re-capturing the lost freighters.  I always thought suicide-squad marines blowing up freighters was out-of-line; especially, for the Feds.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Karnak »

Fluf

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #67 on: April 04, 2003, 04:29:27 pm »
I agree, the Courier mission can have some big payoffs.  However, 90% of the time now flying my Firehawk, the Courier is a COV with +50 Marines on it.  Also, Rom AI is just pitifull.  So unless you fly the courier mission with a wingman, it is almost impossible.  Flying a Rom frigate also gets you the the FFG for a courier ship.  No way to capture.

But I have made over 1400PP in one courier mission, running with 3 live wingman vs a live Fed player and his 3 AI.  We captured all the ships and ran the live player off.  But the point is, the mission is showing up over 50% of the time when trying to take a hex solo.  It lasts to long, is to hard and doesnt pay enought for the repairs and parts you use, if you cant capture.

Gumby

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #68 on: April 04, 2003, 04:32:02 pm »
Quote:

I agree, the Courier mission can have some big payoffs.  However, 90% of the time now flying my Firehawk, the Courier is a COV with +50 Marines on it.  Also, Rom AI is just pitifull.  So unless you fly the courier mission with a wingman, it is almost impossible.  Flying a Rom frigate also gets you the the FFG for a courier ship.  No way to capture.

But I have made over 1400PP in one courier mission, running with 3 live wingman vs a live Fed player and his 3 AI.  We captured all the ships and ran the live player off.  But the point is, the mission is showing up over 50% of the time when trying to take a hex solo.  It lasts to long, is to hard and doesnt pay enought for the repairs and parts you use, if you cant capture.  




 Ya know, i was looking for a nice, non-whiney way to say this, but I think Fluf has wrapped it up nicely.  

Soreyes

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #69 on: April 04, 2003, 09:38:42 pm »
OMG I just got done with another Courier mission. all I can say is WOW about my AI Wingmen. I had 2 L-BCCP's as wingmen VS  R-KE, 2x R-SPA, And a R-SNB as the Courier. To make a long story short. The L-BCCP's crushed the KE And the SPA's I captured the courier, but then my 2 wingmen came over and ESG'ed the SNB to death. Total pp=800....WoW

Green

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #70 on: April 04, 2003, 09:51:27 pm »
The Courier mission is real simple.  No problem.  You can get 900+ without taking an internal.  This is how you do it ...

Step 1.  Get SPQR Remiak and his CON+ to fly as your wing.

Step 2.  Let him make sure you place the first marine on each ship.

Step 3.  Get a bunch of PP.

 

Okay, I agree with the crowd on this one.  The Courier mission does have problems.  In solo, a commando ship shows up more often then naught as the Courier.  But it was a blast flying the mission w/ Remiak (thanks Rem).  Is it possible the Courier ship is some how tied into the number of players?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Green »

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: Some enticement to get the Feds back on DOE
« Reply #71 on: April 11, 2003, 10:06:16 am »
In the light of the new developments concerning Tracey's Pie, I think this thread needs a bump.