« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Topic: Plug for Team Speak 2  (Read 2042 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Plug for Team Speak 2
« on: March 19, 2003, 07:42:55 am »
I have been using RW for a long, long time. But I am hear to say that this Team Speak 2 has the best audio quality I have ever heard. The user interface is clean and user friendly and the stability of it so very much better than RW.

It gets a little jumpy at 50 people using the freedown load, but gads it takes 50 users just to make it a little jumpy.

For what it's worth I give it 2 thumbs up.

Hooch

www.teamspeak.org , give it a try you might like it.    
Logged

Subspace

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2003, 07:45:23 am »
yes sir TS is alot better than RW      

Bump      
Logged

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2003, 07:48:24 am »
What ports does it use?  
Logged

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2003, 08:25:43 am »
Quote:

What ports does it use?    



hehe good question I will check.

Hooch
Logged

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2003, 09:36:41 pm »
It's just that I have successfully mastered the SFC and GSA (includes RW) ports and don't have room for any more entries in the router forwarding table.  
Logged

Cocomoe

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2003, 09:56:55 pm »
    Not sure depending on your bandwith I've gone 100 people with 384kup with no chop.
 
Logged

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2003, 02:44:35 am »
Quote:

    Not sure depending on your bandwith I've gone 100 people with 384kup with no chop.
 



Bandwidth and number of users has nothing to do with configuring the required ports (if any) for the software to work from behind a firewall. I know that the distributed network that RW uses can support a lot of people (~30) over a base station set up on a PC running over dial-up, but if you don't have the ports configured correctly you get problems.  
Logged

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2003, 07:42:55 am »
I have been using RW for a long, long time. But I am hear to say that this Team Speak 2 has the best audio quality I have ever heard. The user interface is clean and user friendly and the stability of it so very much better than RW.

It gets a little jumpy at 50 people using the freedown load, but gads it takes 50 users just to make it a little jumpy.

For what it's worth I give it 2 thumbs up.

Hooch

www.teamspeak.org , give it a try you might like it.    
Logged

Subspace

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2003, 07:45:23 am »
yes sir TS is alot better than RW      

Bump      
Logged

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2003, 07:48:24 am »
What ports does it use?  
Logged

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2003, 08:25:43 am »
Quote:

What ports does it use?    



hehe good question I will check.

Hooch
Logged

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2003, 09:36:41 pm »
It's just that I have successfully mastered the SFC and GSA (includes RW) ports and don't have room for any more entries in the router forwarding table.  
Logged

Cocomoe

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2003, 09:56:55 pm »
    Not sure depending on your bandwith I've gone 100 people with 384kup with no chop.
 
Logged

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Plug for Team Speak 2
« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2003, 02:44:35 am »
Quote:

    Not sure depending on your bandwith I've gone 100 people with 384kup with no chop.
 



Bandwidth and number of users has nothing to do with configuring the required ports (if any) for the software to work from behind a firewall. I know that the distributed network that RW uses can support a lot of people (~30) over a base station set up on a PC running over dial-up, but if you don't have the ports configured correctly you get problems.  
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »