Topic: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed  (Read 8814 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

La'ra

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #20 on: March 20, 2003, 01:58:24 pm »
Picard also referred to the NCC-1701 as a Constitution-class in the TNG episode Relics.  Scotty, who he said it too, would surely have objected if he'd gotten it wrong.

No bloody Starship class, Enterprise class, or head of the class.  So it is, so it shall always be, regardless of what it said on a $5.00 prop.
 
 

StarTrekcaptain

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #21 on: March 20, 2003, 02:04:33 pm »
Exactly.  When they made the episode, Trials and Tribble-lations.  They made it as a 30 anversary episode, to mark 30 years of Trek.  They wouldn't have made a mistake like calling the ship a class that it wasn't.  And I'm sorry to say, but anyone who dissagrees is wrong, simple.

sjvessey

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #22 on: April 15, 2003, 09:57:49 am »
What about the Space Shuttle called 'Enterprise'?  Shouldn't you say THAT is the 'first'??

Talk about arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin....
 

Argos65987

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #23 on: April 15, 2003, 11:14:50 am »
Quote:


Talk about arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin....
   




Canon says it's 437    

Alidar Jarok

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #24 on: April 15, 2003, 12:47:06 pm »
I was possitive it was 438  

ChamadaIV

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #25 on: April 15, 2003, 05:09:01 pm »
Quote:

I was possitive it was 438  




Whoa. Somebody revived this thread. You figure after a month it would die off into page 2 or 3. I guess not this time...

It was mentioned earlier (I think by Pestalence) that in the ST: Generations movie, the NX-01 was shown to be a Daedelus class ship. This is true. How will Rick Berman ever explain this, we may never know. Perhaps the NX-01 as we know it in  Enterprise will be destroyed somehow and a new ship will be built to replace the old one, thus launching a new class of ship while still retaining the old registry number, similar (but not the same) to what they did to the USS Sao Paulo in DS9 after the first USS Defiant (the TNG Defiant, not the TOS ship) was destroyed.

Phase pistols and particle cannons galore,

CIV      

Alidar Jarok

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #26 on: April 15, 2003, 07:25:22 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

I was possitive it was 438  




Whoa. Somebody revived this thread. You figure after a month it would die off into page 2 or 3. I guess not this time...

It was mentioned earlier (I think by Pestalence) that in the ST: Generations movie, the NX-01 was shown to be a Daedelus class ship. This is true. How will Rick Berman ever explain this, we may never know. Perhaps the NX-01 as we know it in  Enterprise will be destroyed somehow and a new ship will be built to replace the old one, thus launching a new class of ship while still retaining the old registry number, similar (but not the same) to what they did to the USS Sao Paulo in DS9 after the first USS Defiant (the TNG Defiant, not the TOS ship) was destroyed.

Phase pistols and particle cannons galore,

CIV      




Not exactly

In ST: TMP there was a list of Enterprises (much like the posters Archer had)

It listed OV-101, NCC-1701, and a new ship that looks a lot like the Surak class ship from Enterprise (Vulcan ship).

NX-01 wasn't lised.  

In Nemesis you could see it, though.

ChamadaIV

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #27 on: April 15, 2003, 08:05:55 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I was possitive it was 438  




Whoa. Somebody revived this thread. You figure after a month it would die off into page 2 or 3. I guess not this time...

It was mentioned earlier (I think by Pestalence) that in the ST: Generations movie, the NX-01 was shown to be a Daedelus class ship. This is true. How will Rick Berman ever explain this, we may never know. Perhaps the NX-01 as we know it in  Enterprise will be destroyed somehow and a new ship will be built to replace the old one, thus launching a new class of ship while still retaining the old registry number, similar (but not the same) to what they did to the USS Sao Paulo in DS9 after the first USS Defiant (the TNG Defiant, not the TOS ship) was destroyed.

Phase pistols and particle cannons galore,

CIV      




Not exactly

In ST: TMP there was a list of Enterprises (much like the posters Archer had)

It listed OV-101, NCC-1701, and a new ship that looks a lot like the Surak class ship from Enterprise (Vulcan ship).

NX-01 wasn't lised.  

In Nemesis you could see it, though.  




Thus Rick Berman is re-writing Trek canon. Thank you for helping me point that out.  

Alidar Jarok

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #28 on: April 15, 2003, 09:04:33 pm »
Although he is re-writing by making another ship named Enterprise (NX-01) as opposed to the SS Enterprise

But, at the same time, they make a ship that perfectly fits Trek canon (except, maybe its size)

The Surak ship looks a lot like the SS Enterprise, while at the same time has a resemblence to the T'Pau from Unification.

StarTrekcaptain

  • Guest
Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #29 on: March 17, 2003, 12:27:19 pm »
I posted this on another thread that I started, but I don't think lots of people will read it so I'm posting here.

Ok, I thought I was getting abit confused abit this whole six enterprise thing, so I have just watched the episode again and heres how it ran

Bridge Defiant - Viewscreens all fuzzy

Miles "I'm picking up another ship"

Sisko "Can you identify it?"

Dax "No, but its close, VERY close"

Miles "Hang on, I've got it"

The viewscreen begins to clear up and its the Enterpirse inall her CGI glory, its kirks enterprise, the one from TOS

Credits

DS9 Siskos office Sisko is there and two agents from Temproal Investigations Starfleet are there

Agent one "Which Enterprise Captain? Be spiefic there have been 5"

Aganet two "Six!"

Sisko "Oh, this was the first enterprise - Consitution class"

Agent 1 "AHH. THE SHIP"

Agent 2 "Captain James Kirk

Sisko - Smiling Broadly "The one and Only"

Agent 2 "17 seperate temproal vilolations, the biggest file on record"

Angent 1"the man was a menece."

-------------------------------------------------

Anyway, my point is that if they called that ship the FIRST one, then that means there have been 5 other ones after it. Now this was episode 5.3.2 and First contact wasn't released untill episode 5.5.2, this was when they changed the uniforms to coinside with irst Conatct. Now they say in First conatct that they have been out in space a year now (Gerdi does when they have been sent to the neutral zone) So we can count that as one of the five. So we still have the problem of determining the others. BUT, my point is, in that timeline in what we call "Cannon" there was NEVER a NX-01 Enterprise! And this makes me MAD so very MAD. That after 30 years, they just say oh I know, lets ruin everything that startrek is and create ships that never existed. Anyway, I could go on for ever about how much I hate Enterprise, but I will finish by saying, I like to consider myslef an "Expert" in TNG timline, I never saw TOS untill I had watched many episodes of TNG and DS9 so I prefer the TNG universe. And like I said, when people go messing with my expertise, It makes me mad. So from this day forward, as I am using this episode of DS9 as my proof I declare this -

"ALL ENTERPIRSE EPISODES, AND PLOTS, SUB-PLOTS WHAT HAVE YOU, ARE TO BE DECLARED NON-CANNON."

I think that is fair.

 

Lepton1

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #30 on: March 17, 2003, 12:57:06 pm »
Simply put, who cares?  Just enjoy the show or don't.  Take Shatner's advice to Trekkies and get a life.

Chris Jones

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #31 on: March 17, 2003, 01:09:53 pm »
Well he is obviously passionate about Star Trek and it shows, and does have some valid points. He is not able to enjoy the shows as you do. The Enteprise writers and producers are trying to keep the TNG, DS9, and Voyager fans around by incorporating some TNG elements via time travel, etc.. A good idea on paper, but lots of paradoxes. That DS9 episode,' Trials and Tribble-ations' that StarTrekcaptain refers to is one of the best DS9 shows, IMO, but it was made even before 1st Contact, before 'Enterprise' was even a brain cell.  

When i watch Enteprise i get the feeling that it's still TNG somewhow, not pre-TOS. It just doesn't work for me.  I do like Scott Bakula, though.

Chris TNG Jones

 

Monty

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #32 on: March 17, 2003, 01:40:35 pm »
The series, as Chris Jones has mentioned, is full of inconsistencies. Its to be expected with a series that is so huge.

Does anyone else remember when Picard gave two different numbers for the number of decks in the First Contact Film for the Enterprise E?

A script error?

Nothing good can become of disecting scripts.

I don't see how this should void ALL of the Enterprise episodes.

I watch and enjoy the Enterprise episodes. As much as this is going to sound hypocritical, I don't take them 'seriously' when it comes to the overall 'trek picture'- they have, for me, more of an entertaining factor rather than a lets rewrite history factor.  

MarianoDT

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #33 on: March 17, 2003, 02:39:21 pm »
Mmmmm, my Temporal Mechanic course starts next term. So untill that, i canīt help you......

 

Uss_Defiant

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #34 on: March 17, 2003, 03:07:37 pm »
ENT takes place in the Mirror Universe!!
This theory of mine fits in perfectly with the Shatner books, and also supports the mirror unverse's "readyness" of the borg...
If i'm not being clear enough tell me.. i'm in a bit of a rush so i'll elaborate in a few hours..  

Scarrita

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2003, 04:23:00 pm »
The best excuse I have heard about the NX-01 not counting in any Enterprise lists is that they are only counting the "Federation Enterprises", seeing how the Federation doesn't exist yet, on the show, it's a "passable" excuse.

Whatever, Berman and Braga are single handedly (or is that dual handedly?) destroying the Star Trek franchise.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Scarrita »

Draco

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2003, 06:15:53 pm »
        Technically Starfleet itself isn?t meant to exist until after the Federation is formed. The Federation charter, ca. 2161, created Starfleet, so the very existence of it now is a violation. The show does have an almost distinct TNG feel to it, more like Voyager though, but that?s because the majority of their troubles seem to come from unknown and hostile ships, though given their situation this is unavoidable. One of the things I really don?t like is how a lot of their things look like today?s palm pilots. Who exactly is making these things? Motorola? Maybe Nokia?

        If you want to talk about real discontinuity, the ?phase pistols? are the subject of choice, I think. In ?A Matter of Time? (TNG) Worf specifically stated that phasers were not invented until the 22nd century, and if you look at ?The Cage? (TOS) the enterprise crew had nothing more than lasers, and only 3 settings on them,  and they had to be twisted like a sticky flashlight (torch for the British) to get them to change. So you can?t say that it works because the two aren?t spelled the same. This is quite likely just a bad attempt at giving the crew a non-lethal weapon.

        Granted it is a rather enjoyable show on its own, but it isn?t on its own. It?s like trying to preserve history, when all you have to go on is a math book. It just doesn?t work.  

Arcilte

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #37 on: March 17, 2003, 08:59:24 pm »
Quote:

The best excuse I have heard about the NX-01 not counting in any Enterprise lists is that they are only counting the "Federation Enterprises", seeing how the Federation doesn't exist yet, on the show, it's a "passable" excuse.

Whatever, Berman and Braga are single handedly (or is that dual handedly?) destroying the Star Trek franchise.  




I agree with Scarrita. This seems like a good excuse.  

Kyoshi

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #38 on: March 18, 2003, 09:38:12 am »
Dont forget the weird effects of the Temporal Cold War (TCW) the ST:ENT-Serie is based on.

IIRC, the NX-01 was rescued in Episode 11 by the Suliban Silik. Ordered to stop a "Energy-Cascade" in the Warp-Engines, which would else have lead to the complete destruction of "the first warp 5 ship". Wasnīt Daniels himself very surprised, that NX-Enterprise still existed? I dont think, Starfleet would mention a experimental Ship in their historybooks, that failed to survive the first test-flight (even or specially, if it carried this name).

But IMO we are already in a different time-line since the first episode: Genetic modifed Suliban hunting a Klingon, who has informations about the klingon empire situation, which is affected from unknown external events based on the TCW. Only as a result of these actions, Archer is able to launch the Enterprise. Something, the Vulcans would else have prevented maybe for many more years - when not at all (as it seems to be a fact in the timeline of DS9?).

Let me also spekulate: Even the Prototyp-Phasepistols would not have been seen in Action for a long time, if not invented by Malcom for the Suliban-Helix-Mission. Maybe this is explaining, why years later, in "the cage", outdated Lasercannons are still used instead.

So ST:ENT shows us a complete alternate view, about exploring, expanding and development of the Starfleet, as it could have been happend, if the vulcans wouldnīt have been such a...

...well, just my point of view.  

StarTrekcaptain

  • Guest
Re: Spin off thread - NX-01 never existed
« Reply #39 on: March 18, 2003, 11:14:48 am »
Thats a sound explanation bgut it has one very large hole.  The seires isn't in a different timeline.  All the adverts, posters and interviews that I have seen indicate that the show is "100 years befor kirk" "the first starfleet ship to venture into the galaxy"  etc.  Rick Bremer has made a series which talks about Starfleets first steps into deep space.  NOT an alternate timeline.  The Explantaion is that hes FU$KED around with the existing universe and completly destoryed everything that star trek stands for and what it has grown into over 30 years.