Topic: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP  (Read 47879 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #20 on: January 09, 2014, 10:50:14 pm »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:13:32 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline Centurus

  • Old Mad Man Making Ship Again....Kinda?
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 8511
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #21 on: January 09, 2014, 10:52:46 pm »
Slightly different nacell placement, but I still think that it is a sleeker version of this:
























Adam's top one looks a lot like the scout ship from The Defector, or am I remembering wrong?


This is the actual model I need.  Not an equivalent ship for classification, but this particular design.  Just higher poly.  The one I found on SFC3 files, and even on the old Staryards site, they're Armada ports from the looks of it, meaning they're about 500 polys or less. 
The pen is truly mightier than the sword.  And considerably easier to write with.

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #22 on: January 10, 2014, 01:30:52 am »
Deleted: I had the wrong thing posted.

« Last Edit: January 10, 2014, 02:01:54 am by Corbomite »

Offline OlBuzzard

  • renegade
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1759
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #23 on: January 10, 2014, 07:53:37 am »
Hey Centurus ....
I'll mess with this over the week end.  I think the way this forum is set up I can post screenies off of my HD. 

Ummm ..  just one thing I noticed:  the front end of this particular model looks overly simplified and somewhat "boxy" .  Mind if I add a little "flare" to this (as long as I don't get carried away) ?
If you aim at nothing:  you WILL hit it every time !

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #24 on: January 10, 2014, 11:35:23 am »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:13:20 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #25 on: January 10, 2014, 11:50:47 am »
No need, there was a pic already in the file:






Pretty nice, but the wings could sweep forward a little more.

Offline OlBuzzard

  • renegade
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1759
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #26 on: January 10, 2014, 12:00:56 pm »
This one also has different warp nacelle placement as well.  YO !  Centurus... which one do you prefer?
If you aim at nothing:  you WILL hit it every time !

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #27 on: January 10, 2014, 12:42:57 pm »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:13:13 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #28 on: January 10, 2014, 12:49:45 pm »
I'm for the second one with modified wings. It looks more like a FireHawk than any posted so far. The nacelle placement is rather irrelevant as long as it looks good.

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #29 on: January 10, 2014, 12:52:27 pm »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:13:07 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline OlBuzzard

  • renegade
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1759
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #30 on: January 10, 2014, 02:05:55 pm »
I'm for the second one with modified wings. It looks more like a FireHawk than any posted so far. The nacelle placement is rather irrelevant as long as it looks good.

YIKES !!!

OK !

 :thumbsup:
If you aim at nothing:  you WILL hit it every time !

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2014, 05:43:48 pm »
YIKES !!!

OK !

 :thumbsup:


Well if you want something easy try that kitbash of the KCN nose on the Praetor model I wanted.  ;) :)

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2014, 07:03:23 pm »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:12:53 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2014, 07:17:43 pm »
The one at the bottom is the SFB version and I assume you don't mean the SparrowHawk models. They all look like the same model otherwise, which is a good model, but if Centurus wants a close replica of the model in the stock game like I showed, the wings will have to be extended towards the front to make the silhouette look correct. I like the nacelles on the top and at the end of the wings and someone could just extend the part where the wing crooks and the nacelle ends into a point to complete the wing form.

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #34 on: January 10, 2014, 08:38:57 pm »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:12:46 pm by Captain Adam »


Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #36 on: January 10, 2014, 09:46:27 pm »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:12:41 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #37 on: January 10, 2014, 09:50:31 pm »
I have the Fleetdock 13 and UltimateTOS models in a backup file, but they are all SFB style.

Offline Captain Adam

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 756
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #38 on: January 11, 2014, 10:45:48 am »
.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 02:12:31 pm by Captain Adam »

Offline Centurus

  • Old Mad Man Making Ship Again....Kinda?
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 8511
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romulan BC from SFC1 and SFC2/OP
« Reply #39 on: January 11, 2014, 04:53:06 pm »
This is what I get for having to work these days.

Buzz, honestly, can't decide.  All are good.  Whichever closely resembles the ship my friend is asking for would be best.  If you want, add a little flare to the design to make it look nice.  I don't think it would hurt.  Besides, the original is such low poly, and as we have seen there are some minor variants, and also given which texture set is applied, it can have different details.  So, surprise me.

To everyone else, thanks for the response in this.  I think there might be demand for a ship like this.
The pen is truly mightier than the sword.  And considerably easier to write with.