Thank goodness you put the 1971 Andromeda Strain up instead of the newer one. The newer one sucked!
Here's the take from the
IMDB:
This is the MTV version
4 June 2008 | by siderite (Romania) – See all my reviews
During the late sixties, Michael Crichton wrote a novel about contamination with an alien microorganism. At that time, science was hailed as the pinnacle of human achievement and it was thought that anything is possible. Therefore it is normal for the book and the subsequent film from 1971 to focus on the science, on the formalism, on the way people think their way out of a situation.
Fast forward to 2008. People are dumber, science is a joke, people need to look good and the design must be perfect. Some horrible deaths and some fear of government conspiracy or terrorism is the only way tension can be achieved.
The problem is that I have anticipated this. My own theory says that if you expect it to happen, there won't be a negative response, yet I am terribly angry at this mini series BECAUSE it was exactly what I expected. Things have been added to the original story that make no sense and make no sense to add: government black ops, wormholes, message from the future, ecological controversy over ocean vent mining, etc, etc. As expected the effects were really good, the people looked good, the computer interface design was flawless. And it all fell completely empty.
If you are familiar to The Andromeda Strain book or 1971 movie, you might find it interesting to see how it can go horribly wrong. Otherwise, just watch the 1971 version. It is slow paced, faithful to the book and a lot more interesting.
Still regret buying that DVD. The 1971 original is a classic that was done very well, and didn't need this stain on it's reputation...
With all that, I voted for District 9. I liked it a lot, so there!
Poll
Topic: Sci FI Poll 33: Old vs New (Read 2050 times)