Check out XenoCorp.Net's FTP site !! Over 10 GB of gaming files for your downloading pleasure: ftp.xenocorp.net
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MUMBAI, India – It looks like an iPad, only it's 1/14th the cost: India has unveiled the prototype of a $35 basic touchscreen tablet aimed at students, which it hopes to bring into production by 2011.If the government can find a manufacturer, the Linux operating system-based computer would be the latest in a string of "world's cheapest" innovations to hit the market out of India, which is home to the 100,000 rupee ($2,127) compact Nano car, the 749 rupees ($16) water purifier and the $2,000 open-heart surgery.The tablet can be used for functions like word processing, web browsing and video-conferencing. It has a solar power option too — important for India's energy-starved hinterlands — though that add-on costs extra.[See photos from India's recent Fashion Week]"This is our answer to MIT's $100 computer," human resource development minister Kapil Sibal told the Economic Times when he unveiled the device Thursday.In 2005, Nicholas Negroponte — co-founder of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Media Lab — unveiled a prototype of a $100 laptop for children in the developing world. India rejected that as too expensive and embarked on a multiyear effort to develop a cheaper option of its own.Negroponte's laptop ended up costing about $200, but in May his nonprofit association, One Laptop Per Child, said it plans to launch a basic tablet computer for $99.Sibal turned to students and professors at India's elite technical universities to develop the $35 tablet after receiving a "lukewarm" response from private sector players. He hopes to get the cost down to $10 eventually.Mamta Varma, a ministry spokeswoman, said falling hardware costs and intelligent design make the price tag plausible. The tablet doesn't have a hard disk, but instead uses a memory card, much like a mobile phone. The tablet design cuts hardware costs, and the use of open-source software also adds to savings, she said.Varma said several global manufacturers, including at least one from Taiwan, have shown interest in making the low-cost device, but no manufacturing or distribution deals have been finalized. She declined to name any of the companies.India plans to subsidize the cost of the tablet for its students, bringing the purchase price down to around $20."Depending on the quality of material they are using, certainly it's plausible," said Sarah Rotman Epps, an analyst at Forrester Research. "The question is, is it good enough for students?"Profitability is also a question for the $35 machine.Epps said government subsidies or dual marketing — where higher-priced sales in the developed world are used to subside low-cost sales in markets like India — could convince a manufacturer to come on board.This and similar efforts — like the Kakai Kno and the Entourage Edge tablets — show that there is global demand for an affordable device to trim high textbook costs, she said.If it works, Epps predicts the device could send a shiver of cost-consciousness through the industry."It puts pressure on all device manufacturers to keep costs down and innovate," she said.The project is part of an ambitious education technology initiative by the Indian government, which also aims to bring broadband connectivity to India's 25,000 colleges and 504 universities and make study materials available online.So far nearly 8,500 colleges have been connected and nearly 500 web and video-based courses have been uploaded on YouTube and other portals, the Ministry said.
It seemed like a bit of a stretch from the beginning, but it looks like India's $35 Android tablet is intent on proving the skeptics wrong -- the Indian government has just announced that it's awarded the manufacturing contract to HCL Technologies (makers of the once world's cheapest laptop), and that the first batch of tablets are slated to be available by January 10th.
Why should I let a company dictate how I use the product I bought?
I can't imagine buying an iPad with the current Apple control fetish in place. Why should I let a company dictate how I use the product I bought? Why shouldn't I be able to install applications that Apple doesn't like (like a web browser from another company)? Why should Apple be able to decide retroactively that the app I installed doesn't match their criteria and delete it from MY hardware? MY hardware, MY software, MINE to control.
Quote from: Nemesis on July 24, 2010, 04:31:55 amI can't imagine buying an iPad with the current Apple control fetish in place. Why should I let a company dictate how I use the product I bought? Why shouldn't I be able to install applications that Apple doesn't like (like a web browser from another company)? Why should Apple be able to decide retroactively that the app I installed doesn't match their criteria and delete it from MY hardware? MY hardware, MY software, MINE to control. Boy i hope your not a MY crosoft user .
Topic: Take that Ipad!!! (Read 3922 times)