Topic: Future K'tinga based vessel. (Read 6767 times)

wrathofachilles · « **on:** October 29, 2009, 09:28:46 pm »

needs a good refit name.

Centurus · « **Reply #1 on:** October 29, 2009, 09:50:32 pm »

Am I seeing it right, that it has impulse engines on the front?

Starforce2 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 29, 2009, 10:26:04 pm »

I would say shuttlebays that are open thus a red glow. Or a really good way to reverse lol

Anyways, What does the name ktinga mean? I would start there and find something that is similar but one step "worse" or more "fearsome" ect.

Nice ship btw. Though it doesn't really appear to be too far beyond the ktinga..perhaps early ambassador. One suggestion would be to add those tabs seen on the back of the vorcha to the back of this vessel in a similar position (they're labled as disruptor banks) and maybe another set on the neck where it meets the body to give it some visable armaments.

Dizzy · « **Reply #3 on:** October 30, 2009, 12:16:40 am »

lol, thrust reversers are dumb. I like forward facing impulse!

GotAFarmYet? · « **Reply #4 on:** October 30, 2009, 12:18:15 am »

Starforce just google Kligon Translator and you will find a few sites to full dictionarys

I would go with the jaj ghaH Class or "the day is ours" class

Centurus · « **Reply #5 on:** October 30, 2009, 01:03:41 am »

Don't get me wrong, I think it's a radical departure from the established norms, and I say that in a good way. I'm just wondering if my eyes are playing tricks on me. I'm losing my eye sight these days.

wrathofachilles · « **Reply #6 on:** October 30, 2009, 04:46:37 am »

to me they are two forward facing, glowy things... I'll go ahead and remove the glow as you guys make an excellent point, just be aware I rarely consider function, it's a major short comming of mine.

Centurus · « **Reply #7 on:** October 30, 2009, 05:55:36 am »

Maybe you could replace them with additional forward firing disruptor emitters.

wrathofachilles · « **Reply #8 on:** October 30, 2009, 09:12:39 am »

altered, thanks for the input.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #9 on:** October 30, 2009, 11:16:59 am »

Fantastic!

This is going to be added to my Post-TMP klingon fleet! :-D
Keep them coming, i beg of you

Klingon Fanatic · « **Reply #10 on:** October 30, 2009, 11:31:36 am »

Ramming speed! Wow what a tough as nails looking design.

Centurus · « **Reply #11 on:** October 30, 2009, 01:37:57 pm »

I don't know about anyone, but I would say that this thing is finished.

Chrystoff · « **Reply #12 on:** October 30, 2009, 01:38:57 pm »

Quote from: wrathofachilles on October 30, 2009, 09:12:39 am

altered, thanks for the input.

I like the change! Those could easily be drone launchers.

wrathofachilles · « **Reply #13 on:** October 30, 2009, 02:38:29 pm »

well if anyone wants the model/textures let me know.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #14 on:** October 30, 2009, 03:15:32 pm »

I DO!

Rob (at) Robinomicon (dot) com

unless you decide to release it to the masses.

Rod ONeal · « **Reply #15 on:** October 30, 2009, 03:29:05 pm »

Great looking design (again). Since it's based on the D7 how about angling the nacelles in?

Anthony Scott · « **Reply #16 on:** October 30, 2009, 03:37:27 pm »

Excellent design, want it badly.

wrathofachilles · « **Reply #17 on:** October 30, 2009, 04:07:17 pm »

I intentionally left the nacelles angled, however you are quite welcome to alter my stuff.

GotAFarmYet? · « **Reply #18 on:** October 30, 2009, 07:10:58 pm »

Quote from: Furyofaseraph on October 30, 2009, 03:15:32 pm

I DO!

Rob (at) Robinomicon (dot) com

unless you decide to release it to the masses.

I am with him I will take a copy of it!
or at least make FoaS send a copy of it to me

Ravok · « **Reply #19 on:** October 30, 2009, 08:56:02 pm »

New Sword ??

chu`'etlh.

That is a really nice looking ship !!

drool.

News:

Topic: Future K'tinga based vessel. (Read 6767 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Ravok

Topic: Future K'tinga based vessel. (Read 6767 times)