Topic: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.  (Read 21738 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline manitoba1073

  • FLEET ADMIRAL OF THE YARDS
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Gender: Male
    • manitobashipyards
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2009, 05:21:42 pm »

 Some people really need to pull there heads outa there arses about this movie. I mean FFS IT DOES NOT REWRITE TREK. Its a whole new line of trek.  That means that TOS is still there and nothing has changed it. I REPEAT NOTHING HAS CHANGED .



Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2009, 05:26:13 pm »
Its the new dominant timeline.  Just as the timeline where the Borg took over in first contact was briefly the dominant timeline.  So for all intents and purposes, the argument that TOS still exists in another dimension does not make it any better.

Offline Centurus

  • Old Mad Man Making Ship Again....Kinda?
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 8505
  • Gender: Male
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2009, 05:52:42 pm »
This timeline overwrites the original due to the mechanics of its existence.  Nero and Spock get sucked into the wormhole, and they both appear in the past, Spock over 20 years after Nero.  However, Nero's appearance in the past and the destruction of the Kelvin changes the course of events, it doesn't create a new timeline where established canon remains.  The original timeline is destroyed in favor of the new timeline which the bastardprise now exists.

JJ and the producers either were very mistaken, or were hoping that Trek fans wouldn't realize they were being lied to, when they gave the excuse that this is an alternate timeline.

Trek XI is an altered timeline, not alternate.  Alternate implies that it exists parallel with the other timeline, but this isn't the case of Trek XI.  Trek XI alters the timeline, meaning that it takes the place of the original timeline, the original timeline no longer existing, with the exception of in the memory of the older Spock, with older Spock being the only remnant of the original timeline, which no longer exists.
The pen is truly mightier than the sword.  And considerably easier to write with.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2009, 06:34:28 pm »
This timeline overwrites the original due to the mechanics of its existence.  Nero and Spock get sucked into the wormhole, and they both appear in the past, Spock over 20 years after Nero.  However, Nero's appearance in the past and the destruction of the Kelvin changes the course of events, it doesn't create a new timeline where established canon remains.  The original timeline is destroyed in favor of the new timeline which the bastardprise now exists.

I don't think that can be legitimately stated.  It is already a part of Trek lore that there are different forms of time travel and some of them can alter the past and others cannot.

The two classic examples:

The City on the Edge of Forever - saving Keeler changed history.

Assignment Earth - in spite of everything they did the nuclear platform exploded right where history had recorded it.  Without them it would have exploded lower or not launched at all.

Two different methods of time travel and two different results.

I postulate that the Borg time travel method either was to a parallel universe or created a split in the timeline.  If it didn't then the changes recorded by the Enterprise D in the events of First Contact SHOULD have been recorded in the history they returned to and they should have resulted in significant differences.  I place Enterprise with its timeline changes in that alternate history due to the episode - Regeneration - where the Borg and wreckage from of First Contact are encountered.  If that event had happened in the same time line as TNG then Data assuredly at some point would have mentioned it.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2009, 06:46:01 pm »
This timeline overwrites the original due to the mechanics of its existence.  Nero and Spock get sucked into the wormhole, and they both appear in the past, Spock over 20 years after Nero.  However, Nero's appearance in the past and the destruction of the Kelvin changes the course of events, it doesn't create a new timeline where established canon remains.  The original timeline is destroyed in favor of the new timeline which the bastardprise now exists.

I don't think that can be legitimately stated.  It is already a part of Trek lore that there are different forms of time travel and some of them can alter the past and others cannot.

The two classic examples:

The City on the Edge of Forever - saving Keeler changed history.

Assignment Earth - in spite of everything they did the nuclear platform exploded right where history had recorded it.  Without them it would have exploded lower or not launched at all.

Two different methods of time travel and two different results.

I postulate that the Borg time travel method either was to a parallel universe or created a split in the timeline.  If it didn't then the changes recorded by the Enterprise D in the events of First Contact SHOULD have been recorded in the history they returned to and they should have resulted in significant differences.  I place Enterprise with its timeline changes in that alternate history due to the episode - Regeneration - where the Borg and wreckage from of First Contact are encountered.  If that event had happened in the same time line as TNG then Data assuredly at some point would have mentioned it.

Enterprise occurred during the cannon timeline.  That is certified during the series finale, which has Riker replaying the NX-01's final mission on the holodeck as part of an effort to make a difficult decision during the episode "the pegasis."  As for the borg episode of Enterprise, there are two reasons Data might not have known about it.  The first is that Archer and company didn't fully realize what they had encountered, and the mission became one page among the numerous successful missions that made up the NX-01's history.  Another explanation is that Starfleet might have tried to cover it up.  Voyager pretty much states that the admiralty knew full well about the existence of the borg since at least the end of the 23rd century.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2009, 07:06:42 pm »
Enterprise occurred during the cannon timeline.  That is certified during the series finale, which has Riker replaying the NX-01's final mission on the holodeck as part of an effort to make a difficult decision during the episode "the pegasis." 

All that shows is that A Riker exists in the future of Enterprise it doesn't demonstrate that the TNG Riker did it. 

As for the borg episode of Enterprise, there are two reasons Data might not have known about it.  The first is that Archer and company didn't fully realize what they had encountered, and the mission became one page among the numerous successful missions that made up the NX-01's history.  Another explanation is that Starfleet might have tried to cover it up.  Voyager pretty much states that the admiralty knew full well about the existence of the borg since at least the end of the 23rd century.

Presumably Data and the Enterprise as being among the foremost experts on the Borg would have been cleared for EVERYTHING.  Even if not then he should have been able to know the public references by Cochrane to the Borg and would have brought them up at some time during First Contact.  This says to me that Enterprise is a different timeline. 

Add all the other "oddities" in Enterprise such as the destruction of an alien colony that the future that Daniel came from didn't record is an example of the changed timeline.  Also the existance of the Expanse is not compatible with the main timeline.  Half the races in the Alpha quadrant having cloaks when in TOS the Enterprise was unaware of such a technology is another example.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #26 on: May 28, 2009, 07:25:26 pm »
Enterprise occurred during the cannon timeline.  That is certified during the series finale, which has Riker replaying the NX-01's final mission on the holodeck as part of an effort to make a difficult decision during the episode "the pegasis." 

All that shows is that A Riker exists in the future of Enterprise it doesn't demonstrate that the TNG Riker did it. 

As for the borg episode of Enterprise, there are two reasons Data might not have known about it.  The first is that Archer and company didn't fully realize what they had encountered, and the mission became one page among the numerous successful missions that made up the NX-01's history.  Another explanation is that Starfleet might have tried to cover it up.  Voyager pretty much states that the admiralty knew full well about the existence of the borg since at least the end of the 23rd century.

Presumably Data and the Enterprise as being among the foremost experts on the Borg would have been cleared for EVERYTHING.  Even if not then he should have been able to know the public references by Cochrane to the Borg and would have brought them up at some time during First Contact.  This says to me that Enterprise is a different timeline. 

Add all the other "oddities" in Enterprise such as the destruction of an alien colony that the future that Daniel came from didn't record is an example of the changed timeline.  Also the existance of the Expanse is not compatible with the main timeline.  Half the races in the Alpha quadrant having cloaks when in TOS the Enterprise was unaware of such a technology is another example.

The Riker in question was in a known TNG episode "The Pegasis."  As for the borg, it is possible that they might not have put two and two together and realized that the lifeforms that Cochrane was ranting about were the borg.  The only example of cloaking technology I saw in Enterprise were Sulaban, and one episode with Romulan cloaking technology.  The Suliban could have abandoned it after Starfleet gained the ability to see through their cloaks, and they lost their source of future technology, and the Romulans could also disgarded their cloak before the war.  As for the colony that was destroyed by the Suliban, how do you know that the changes the Suliban caused to Daniels' timeline aren't a part of the cannon timeline?  How is the expanse incompatible with cannon?

Offline Centurus

  • Old Mad Man Making Ship Again....Kinda?
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 8505
  • Gender: Male
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #27 on: May 28, 2009, 08:05:33 pm »
Keep in mind also that the whole Temporal Cold War storyline was seriously flawed to begin with.  Rationalizing it in any form, even as part of an alternate timeline, is difficult and problematic, cause there is just as much going against the reasoning behind it as there is for it.

As for the examples you stated before in response to my post, yes, some incidents of time travel actually are needed to ensure that history repeats itself.  Another example is when Picard had to join the away team to go back into Earth's past to stop those aliens from killing off human beings and altering the past, therefore altering the future.  Guinan told Picard that if he didn't go on the away mission, they would never meet.  History must repeat itself.  Same with ST4.

However, when it comes to the Guardian in City On The Edge Of Forever, remember, cause McCoy went back in time and prevented Edith Keeler from dying, all of the Federation ceased to exist.  The only reason the bridge crew remained is because proximity to the Guardian shielded them from the changes in the timeline.  Their own timeline had ceased to exist.  That's why they had to go back and prevent McCoy from doing what he did.  Same thing with the Enterprise E in First Contact.  Data himself said the temporal wake from the rift shielded them from the changes in the timeline, and they were glimpsing an altered timeline in where Earth was assimilated in the past.  Was the Enterprise E meant to originally have been in Cochrane's time?  Who knows.  There are enough points for both sides to debate that till the end of time itself.  However, in order to ensure their own time would be restored, they needed to make sure that first contact with the Vulcans happened, and they had to minimize their pollution of the timeline.

Some of these examples can also be found in another time travel franchise, Back To The Future.  I've seen people refer to those movies to justify Trek XI being in an alternate timeline, but from reviewing the movies a few times recently, their explanation of time travel and temporal theories only proves that Trek XI can't be an alternate timeline due to the changes caused by Nero's involvement in the past.
The pen is truly mightier than the sword.  And considerably easier to write with.

Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #28 on: May 28, 2009, 08:11:15 pm »
Lets call in an expert to explain time travel :laugh: :laugh:

Offline Sirgod

  • Whooot Master Cattle Baron
  • Global Moderator
  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 27844
  • Gender: Male
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2009, 01:27:08 am »
HEY LEAVE BRITTNEY ALONE!!!!111!!ELEVEN :D

Stephen
"You cannot exaggerate about the Marines. They are convinced to the point of arrogance, that they are the most ferocious fighters on earth - and the amusing thing about it is that they are."- Father Kevin Keaney, Chaplain, Korean War

Offline Centurus

  • Old Mad Man Making Ship Again....Kinda?
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 8505
  • Gender: Male
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #30 on: May 29, 2009, 01:49:53 am »
Na, bashing Britney Spears is just about as fun as bashing JJ's afterbirth.
The pen is truly mightier than the sword.  And considerably easier to write with.

Offline Lono

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • Gender: Male
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #31 on: May 29, 2009, 01:52:24 pm »
Ah Ha! - Now THIS is starting to sound like a STAR TREK forum!!

 :coolsmiley:


I do see how I was wrong in thinking they could possibly be pulling of the "Entrerprise" series as cannon - but I do think that First Contact could indeed still be arguably cannon - as long as Cohcran stfu about everything...

 ;)



***** Spoiler Alert******







And perhaps ol' dude Spock is alaways smilin' now since he know he can go all Free Love across the Galaxy - and not hurt his rep - since he has ALREADY put fool proof steps forward to collapse his alternate timeline!

 :P








****End of Spoilerz*******



As far as Britney goes I actual thought it would be pretty funny to approach her as a fan - and then whisper to her that you were from the future and desperately needed her help to Save the Future!

(or to prevent her divorce - or her 15 minutes of fame - any paradigmn will do really)

If she does agree to meet with you just tell her you need a million dollars to build a new time machine to go forward/back to prevent her cataclysmic problem and make her a Hero!

Then tell her that it won't be ready until 60 years in the future - but that it won't matter - 'cuz you'll just go back in time to fix everything once it's done!

Not bloody likey - But still worth a try methinks!

 ;D

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #32 on: June 01, 2009, 06:31:10 pm »
The Riker in question was in a known TNG episode "The Pegasis."  As for the borg, it is possible that they might not have put two and two together and realized that the lifeforms that Cochrane was ranting about were the borg.  The only example of cloaking technology I saw in Enterprise were Sulaban, and one episode with Romulan cloaking technology.  The Suliban could have abandoned it after Starfleet gained the ability to see through their cloaks, and they lost their source of future technology, and the Romulans could also disgarded their cloak before the war.  As for the colony that was destroyed by the Suliban, how do you know that the changes the Suliban caused to Daniels' timeline aren't a part of the cannon timeline?  How is the expanse incompatible with cannon?

I hadn't seen that episode of TNG but I did watch (most of) it and the relevant parts of the Enterprise finale.  The Rikers are different.  The Enterprise Riker is a lot heavier.

No one checking the past for record of the Borg scouting would have considered it likely that a group of cybernetic lifeforms who used the phrase "you will be assimilated" and adapted to weapons fire AND sent a message to the delta quadrant might be THE borg instead of just "borg"?  They know from Guinan that her people met (and were defeated by) the borg in the past so researching past encounters with them would be natural.  Also people like Geordi who hero worshipped Cochrane would have read EVERYTHING about him and by him and would have eventually put 2 and 2 together and went "Holy [censored] the Borg attacked the Phoenix centuries ago"

There was also the cloaked ship in the "slipstream" of the Enterprise and the Klingon cruiser when Trip got pregnant and the cloaked Spheres in the Expanse to name two more.  The Spheres didn't just cloak a ship they cloaked a moon sized object AND the region around it.

The Enterprise Finale has a charter of alliance being signed which Deanna says (to fat  Riker) will lead to the Federation.  WHEN did the Earth-Romulan War occur?  Why wasn't it the Alliance-Romulan war?  Reed speculates about Archer getting one of the new "Warp 7" ships, how would the Romulans without high warp ships be able to compete with them at all?   Only practical if the timeline was different and there was no Earth Romulan war. 

The first contact with the Klingons is supposed to happen much later and not on Earth as occurred in Enterprise.

Is it really believable that Picard would not have the NX-01 in his collection of Enterprise models when it not only laid the groundwork for the Federation but also saved the Earth itself?  Only if there was no NX-01 Enterprise in his history.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #33 on: June 01, 2009, 06:38:24 pm »
I was hoping that when the NX-01 returned to the "present" after the WWII episodes that it would be explicitly back on the mainstream timeline and the NX-01 would be hailed as "unidentified ship" from a different set of space stations from what their records had listed.  Then off into Deep Space so as not to interfere with history again.

I also would have loved an episode starting in Star Fleet HQ with an admiral being told the commander has arrived.  In would walk Worf who would be given a classified mission for the Defiant with a picked crew (including Data).  The mission to jump into the past again using the Borg technique but at a later time to see if the timeline matches their history or not as the whole First Contact affair is leaving them with incompatible histories, what the Enterprise recorded and what history recorded.  They would jump into a "quiet area" of space and quickly encounter the NX-01 (while cloaked) and when a suliban attacked the NX-01 cloak detector would have detected them.  The whole point of course being to make it clear that Enterprise is on a new timeline. 
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #34 on: June 01, 2009, 08:18:42 pm »
The Riker in question was in a known TNG episode "The Pegasis."  As for the borg, it is possible that they might not have put two and two together and realized that the lifeforms that Cochrane was ranting about were the borg.  The only example of cloaking technology I saw in Enterprise were Sulaban, and one episode with Romulan cloaking technology.  The Suliban could have abandoned it after Starfleet gained the ability to see through their cloaks, and they lost their source of future technology, and the Romulans could also disgarded their cloak before the war.  As for the colony that was destroyed by the Suliban, how do you know that the changes the Suliban caused to Daniels' timeline aren't a part of the cannon timeline?  How is the expanse incompatible with cannon?

I hadn't seen that episode of TNG but I did watch (most of) it and the relevant parts of the Enterprise finale.  The Rikers are different.  The Enterprise Riker is a lot heavier.

No one checking the past for record of the Borg scouting would have considered it likely that a group of cybernetic lifeforms who used the phrase "you will be assimilated" and adapted to weapons fire AND sent a message to the delta quadrant might be THE borg instead of just "borg"?  They know from Guinan that her people met (and were defeated by) the borg in the past so researching past encounters with them would be natural.  Also people like Geordi who hero worshipped Cochrane would have read EVERYTHING about him and by him and would have eventually put 2 and 2 together and went "Holy [censored] the Borg attacked the Phoenix centuries ago"

There was also the cloaked ship in the "slipstream" of the Enterprise and the Klingon cruiser when Trip got pregnant and the cloaked Spheres in the Expanse to name two more.  The Spheres didn't just cloak a ship they cloaked a moon sized object AND the region around it.

The Enterprise Finale has a charter of alliance being signed which Deanna says (to fat  Riker) will lead to the Federation.  WHEN did the Earth-Romulan War occur?  Why wasn't it the Alliance-Romulan war?  Reed speculates about Archer getting one of the new "Warp 7" ships, how would the Romulans without high warp ships be able to compete with them at all?   Only practical if the timeline was different and there was no Earth Romulan war. 

The first contact with the Klingons is supposed to happen much later and not on Earth as occurred in Enterprise.

Is it really believable that Picard would not have the NX-01 in his collection of Enterprise models when it not only laid the groundwork for the Federation but also saved the Earth itself?  Only if there was no NX-01 Enterprise in his history.

Unfortunately, Jonathan Frakes is a real person, unfortunately they tend to age over a ten year period.  That shouldn't change the fact that it was taking place in a TNG episode.  As for the romulan war, the mission re-created in the finale is taking place ten years after the rest of Enterprise when the ship is being decommissioned, presumably after the war.  Before paramount decided to go with Abrams' reboot, the planned 11th film would have been an Enterprise film titled Star Trek, the Beginning which would have dealt with the Romulan war.  The Babel story arc in season 4 was meant to tie into that.  Also, from what I've been able to find from web searching the line was supposedly  that there was a disastrous first contact, and  by the time of TOS, had been blood enemies 50 years.  It did not say that they had happened at the same time (I can't find it in day of the dove from my regular TOS DVD set if you can tell me what scene its in I would be appreciative).  Relations with the Klingons during Enterprise were frosty, but nowhere near the cold war that existed during TOS.  I have to re watch the trip pregnancy episode but IIRC, the cloak used in that one was very ineffective.  As for the borg, stuff that is obvious to us from watching the episode layed out as they are would not be obvious to an actual culture with centuries of history.  Also, at the time of First Contact, Cochrane was a drunk.  People might not have believed him.  Enterprise challenged a lot of fannon as well as our preconceptions of what was cannon, but it didn't really break it.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #35 on: June 01, 2009, 10:27:10 pm »
Unfortunately, Jonathan Frakes is a real person, unfortunately they tend to age over a ten year period.  That shouldn't change the fact that it was taking place in a TNG episode.  As for the romulan war, the mission re-created in the finale is taking place ten years after the rest of Enterprise when the ship is being decommissioned, presumably after the war.  Before paramount decided to go with Abrams' reboot, the planned 11th film would have been an Enterprise film titled Star Trek, the Beginning which would have dealt with the Romulan war.  The Babel story arc in season 4 was meant to tie into that.  Also, from what I've been able to find from web searching the line was supposedly  that there was a disastrous first contact, and  by the time of TOS, had been blood enemies 50 years.  It did not say that they had happened at the same time (I can't find it in day of the dove from my regular TOS DVD set if you can tell me what scene its in I would be appreciative).  Relations with the Klingons during Enterprise were frosty, but nowhere near the cold war that existed during TOS.  I have to re watch the trip pregnancy episode but IIRC, the cloak used in that one was very ineffective.  As for the borg, stuff that is obvious to us from watching the episode layed out as they are would not be obvious to an actual culture with centuries of history.  Also, at the time of First Contact, Cochrane was a drunk.  People might not have believed him.  Enterprise challenged a lot of fannon as well as our preconceptions of what was cannon, but it didn't really break it.

If an actor doesn't look right for the role then don't use him.  Isn't that what people said about Shatner wanting to portray Kirk in the new movie?  They could easily have come up with some other scenario for a later time.  I go by what I see in the episode - fat Riker and thin Riker - two different versions in two different timelines.

Mayweather stated quite clearly that they had been on the ship for 10 years that would make the final episode 10 years after the first episode not after the prior episode.  There was nothing said to indicate that a war had happened, nothing to indicate that a war had just ended. 

Also the war was 2156-2160, the final episode is 2161.  That would mean that Shran would have had to have left the Andorian fleet during the war.  Shran with his code of honor could not have done that.

There is also no explanation why Kirk and Spock would be surprised at cloaks when the first Enterprise (whose missions Kirk would surely have studied) encountered them from at least 4 sources.  The only weakness of the "pregnancy" cloak was because the ship was damaged and following closely in the "slipstream" of other ships.

Picard in Season 4 Episode 15 First Contact states that the First Contact with the Klingons was disastrous and led to decades of war.  In Enterprise it was a relatively good set of contacts and no war even if there was no real friendship either.  Clear timeline difference to me.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #36 on: June 01, 2009, 10:39:12 pm »
Unfortunately, Jonathan Frakes is a real person, unfortunately they tend to age over a ten year period.  That shouldn't change the fact that it was taking place in a TNG episode.  As for the romulan war, the mission re-created in the finale is taking place ten years after the rest of Enterprise when the ship is being decommissioned, presumably after the war.  Before paramount decided to go with Abrams' reboot, the planned 11th film would have been an Enterprise film titled Star Trek, the Beginning which would have dealt with the Romulan war.  The Babel story arc in season 4 was meant to tie into that.  Also, from what I've been able to find from web searching the line was supposedly  that there was a disastrous first contact, and  by the time of TOS, had been blood enemies 50 years.  It did not say that they had happened at the same time (I can't find it in day of the dove from my regular TOS DVD set if you can tell me what scene its in I would be appreciative).  Relations with the Klingons during Enterprise were frosty, but nowhere near the cold war that existed during TOS.  I have to re watch the trip pregnancy episode but IIRC, the cloak used in that one was very ineffective.  As for the borg, stuff that is obvious to us from watching the episode layed out as they are would not be obvious to an actual culture with centuries of history.  Also, at the time of First Contact, Cochrane was a drunk.  People might not have believed him.  Enterprise challenged a lot of fannon as well as our preconceptions of what was cannon, but it didn't really break it.

If an actor doesn't look right for the role then don't use him.  Isn't that what people said about Shatner wanting to portray Kirk in the new movie?  They could easily have come up with some other scenario for a later time.  I go by what I see in the episode - fat Riker and thin Riker - two different versions in two different timelines.

Mayweather stated quite clearly that they had been on the ship for 10 years that would make the final episode 10 years after the first episode not after the prior episode.  There was nothing said to indicate that a war had happened, nothing to indicate that a war had just ended. 

Also the war was 2156-2160, the final episode is 2161.  That would mean that Shran would have had to have left the Andorian fleet during the war.  Shran with his code of honor could not have done that.

There is also no explanation why Kirk and Spock would be surprised at cloaks when the first Enterprise (whose missions Kirk would surely have studied) encountered them from at least 4 sources.  The only weakness of the "pregnancy" cloak was because the ship was damaged and following closely in the "slipstream" of other ships.

Picard in Season 4 Episode 15 First Contact states that the First Contact with the Klingons was disastrous and led to decades of war.  In Enterprise it was a relatively good set of contacts and no war even if there was no real friendship either.  Clear timeline difference to me.

You have to suspend disbelief at times.  Jonathan Frakes didn't look exactly like he did during TNG, but he still looked a lot closer than if they had cast someone else as Riker.  Also, none of the actors in Abrams' film looked or sounded exactly like their predecessors.  If that was the only thing off about it, I would have given the film a pass.  Sorry, I goofed on whether it was ten years since launch or ten years from first episode.  I should have looked it up before posting.  Kirk and Spock were going on what was known in terms of war era Romulans.  Also, if it was an issue of protecting his daughter, Shran would have considered that his priority under the Andorian honor code.  Remember he was willing to throw away any chance of doing his duty to Andor, and stopping the Romulans in order to avenge the woman he loved.  As for Picard's statement, first contact in Broken Bow involved a farmer shooting a Klingon courier in the chest with a plasma rifle, that is hardly a good way to start off, and it may have affected the commencement of hostilities later.  One thing that Enterprise did do really well is explain why earth is at the center of the federation despite the fact that humans are relative newcomers to space.

Offline Lieutenant_Q

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1669
  • Gender: Male
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #37 on: June 01, 2009, 11:27:24 pm »
I would suggest that anyone upset with "These are the Voyages."  Get the Enterprise Novel, "The Good that Men Do."

It starts with Jake and Nog reminiscing about the old times, the Captain Nog shows Jake a section of recently declassified data.  Declassified because the Romulans are now a member of the Federation.  Jake reads it over and says...wtf?

The declassified data is the REAL version of what happened in TatV.  Stating that it happened during the fourth season, rather than the six years later.  The event that Archer is speaking at, is the foundation of the immediate predecessor to the Federation, the Coalition of Planets, and it is that Coalition that fights the "Earth/Romulan" war.  The problems with the Coalition charter (think of the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States as what this is based on) led to the formation of the Federation following the war.  Trip didn't die, rather he faked his death to go undercover on Romulus.

Shran was found guilty of negligence with the loss of his ship and was drummed out of the Andorian service, it wasn't stated in the book directly, but they laid the ground work for him joining Starfleet, ala T'Pol.

There's more to the book, but I'll leave it at that.
"Your mighty GDI forces have been emasculated, and you yourself are a killer of children.  Now of course it's not true.  But the world only believes what the media tells them to believe.  And I tell the media what to believe, its really quite simple." - Kane (Joe Kucan) Command & Conquer Tiberium Dawn (1995)

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #38 on: June 02, 2009, 11:29:52 am »
Problems with Enterprise falling in the same timeline as ST:TOS or ST:TNG:

1/ Cloaking devices were unknown to Kirk and Spock yet at least 4 separate races in the time of Enterprise have cloaking devices and are encountered by the NX-01 including the Romulans.  It is unlikely that Stiles with his Romulan obsession would not know about the First Contact and the existance of both cloaked mines and cloaked ships.  Stiles would definitely have brought it up when Spock indicated that no one had made a practical invisibility device for ships.

2/ The war would have had to be fought between the last 2 episodes of Enterprise and was supposed to be a direct cause (as I recall) of the founding of the Federation yet is not mentioned by Archer, other Enterprise crew or Riker and Deanna.

3/ The war was fought with "primitive nuclear weapons" yet the NX-01 before entering the Expanse was equipped with phase cannons and photonic torpedoes (antimatter warheads).

4/ Impulse driven Romulan ships versus Warp 5 Earth ships?  Warp 7 ships coming on line just after the wars end?  Why would Kirks Romulans think that their slow ships stand a chance versus the Federation when their speed still lags the Earths ships from the war?  By Kirks time the Romulans have not apparently even caught up to the tech the Earth had 100 years earlier and STILL they want a war?  They are not that stupid.  This only makes sense if in Enterprise Earth technology is accelerated (hints Cochrane got from the Phoenix repairs perhaps).

5/ The NX-01 encounters the Borg yet Starfleet of ST:TNG never seems to figure it out.  Not even with experts like Data sifting through history for any information on earlier Borg victories (Guinan's people) and more importantly defeats. 

6/ The difference in the two Rikers (Enterprise finale (fat) vs ST:TNG Pegasus).  Rikers decision in the Enterprise finale is after a holodeck experience but in Pegasus it was when he found out that the cloak was intact.  If it was only "fat Riker" suspension of disbelief would be acceptable (but a stupid choice by the film makers) but combine with everything else and the facts add up to a different history. 

7/ The NX-01 is recalled to be present for the signing of the Charter of Alliance in the same year the Articles of Federation were due to be signed.  Deanna says "You wish we could tell them all this Alliance will give birth to the Federation".  A Federation that is supposed to form that very year.  Not likely that both would happen so quickly.  An argument could be made that the Enterprise had 2 consecutive full 5 year mission in which case the articles were signed in September and that leaves too little time to negoiate the Articles of Federation for the same year (and Deannas comments make it clear that this alliance is NOT the Federation) so the Federation is not founded in the correct year.

8/ The Federations (not Earths) first contact with the Klingons is disastrous and leads to decades of war yet in Enterprise the Archer does well by the Empire by saving one of their couriers and delivering information that keeps the Empire out of civil war.  Where is the disaster in that?  You could argue that his later escape (not a first contact) from prison and destroying Duras's ship might have provoked war but then it would have started years afterwards as it had not apparently occurred yet by the end of the series (8 years later after the destruction of Duras's ship). 

Klingon relations (from a history onboard the Defiant in the mirror universe) don't get hostile until 2223 and continue for 70 years.  This is ~70 years after first contact between Earth and Klingons in Enterprise and conflicts with Picards statement.  (That history has other issues as well.)

So to sumarize first contact with Earth pre Federation did not result in war when Picard stated it was with the Federation and resulted in decades of war.   

9/ Daniels states: "The events that are taking place are the result of temporal incursions. They're not supposed to be happening." Yet he ends up satisfied that the timeline is back on track even with the changes.  That only makes sense if the voyage to the 1940s erased the expanse and the whole attack on Earth.

10/ The events of First Contact are apparently not recorded in the ST:TNG time but are in Enterprise.  Archer knows of Cochranes talks about travellers from the future fighting cybernetic aliens but laForge (a big fan of Cochrane) does not.  It would have been too late to classify Cochranes talks decades later laForge or Data would have known or discovered it.

11/ Picard does not have a model of the NX-01 an Enterprise that saved Earth and helped form the Federation, unlikely.

Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline knightstorm

  • His Imperial Highness, Norton II, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2106
Re: The new Star Trek timeline needs a name.
« Reply #39 on: June 02, 2009, 04:31:52 pm »
Problems with Enterprise falling in the same timeline as ST:TOS or ST:TNG:

1/ Cloaking devices were unknown to Kirk and Spock yet at least 4 separate races in the time of Enterprise have cloaking devices and are encountered by the NX-01 including the Romulans.  It is unlikely that Stiles with his Romulan obsession would not know about the First Contact and the existance of both cloaked mines and cloaked ships.  Stiles would definitely have brought it up when Spock indicated that no one had made a practical invisibility device for ships.

2/ The war would have had to be fought between the last 2 episodes of Enterprise and was supposed to be a direct cause (as I recall) of the founding of the Federation yet is not mentioned by Archer, other Enterprise crew or Riker and Deanna.

3/ The war was fought with "primitive nuclear weapons" yet the NX-01 before entering the Expanse was equipped with phase cannons and photonic torpedoes (antimatter warheads).

4/ Impulse driven Romulan ships versus Warp 5 Earth ships?  Warp 7 ships coming on line just after the wars end?  Why would Kirks Romulans think that their slow ships stand a chance versus the Federation when their speed still lags the Earths ships from the war?  By Kirks time the Romulans have not apparently even caught up to the tech the Earth had 100 years earlier and STILL they want a war?  They are not that stupid.  This only makes sense if in Enterprise Earth technology is accelerated (hints Cochrane got from the Phoenix repairs perhaps).

5/ The NX-01 encounters the Borg yet Starfleet of ST:TNG never seems to figure it out.  Not even with experts like Data sifting through history for any information on earlier Borg victories (Guinan's people) and more importantly defeats. 

6/ The difference in the two Rikers (Enterprise finale (fat) vs ST:TNG Pegasus).  Rikers decision in the Enterprise finale is after a holodeck experience but in Pegasus it was when he found out that the cloak was intact.  If it was only "fat Riker" suspension of disbelief would be acceptable (but a stupid choice by the film makers) but combine with everything else and the facts add up to a different history. 

7/ The NX-01 is recalled to be present for the signing of the Charter of Alliance in the same year the Articles of Federation were due to be signed.  Deanna says "You wish we could tell them all this Alliance will give birth to the Federation".  A Federation that is supposed to form that very year.  Not likely that both would happen so quickly.  An argument could be made that the Enterprise had 2 consecutive full 5 year mission in which case the articles were signed in September and that leaves too little time to negoiate the Articles of Federation for the same year (and Deannas comments make it clear that this alliance is NOT the Federation) so the Federation is not founded in the correct year.

8/ The Federations (not Earths) first contact with the Klingons is disastrous and leads to decades of war yet in Enterprise the Archer does well by the Empire by saving one of their couriers and delivering information that keeps the Empire out of civil war.  Where is the disaster in that?  You could argue that his later escape (not a first contact) from prison and destroying Duras's ship might have provoked war but then it would have started years afterwards as it had not apparently occurred yet by the end of the series (8 years later after the destruction of Duras's ship). 

Klingon relations (from a history onboard the Defiant in the mirror universe) don't get hostile until 2223 and continue for 70 years.  This is ~70 years after first contact between Earth and Klingons in Enterprise and conflicts with Picards statement.  (That history has other issues as well.)

So to sumarize first contact with Earth pre Federation did not result in war when Picard stated it was with the Federation and resulted in decades of war.   

9/ Daniels states: "The events that are taking place are the result of temporal incursions. They're not supposed to be happening." Yet he ends up satisfied that the timeline is back on track even with the changes.  That only makes sense if the voyage to the 1940s erased the expanse and the whole attack on Earth.

10/ The events of First Contact are apparently not recorded in the ST:TNG time but are in Enterprise.  Archer knows of Cochranes talks about travellers from the future fighting cybernetic aliens but laForge (a big fan of Cochrane) does not.  It would have been too late to classify Cochranes talks decades later laForge or Data would have known or discovered it.

11/ Picard does not have a model of the NX-01 an Enterprise that saved Earth and helped form the Federation, unlikely.

Assume that all of those cloaks had flaws and were eventually abandoned.  Also Stiles was an expert on wartime romulans.

The war's role in the founding of the federation is implied by the Babel arc where Archer is able to bring together an ad hoc alliance of humans, vulcans, andorians, and tellerites

Most Earth ships don't carry photonic torpedoes, they still use spatial torpedoes.  Also, photonic torpedo technology may have gone onto the back burner for a number of reasons.  More powerful nuclear derived torps may have been developed, During the war production of the photnics might not have been able to keep up, forcing earth to fall back on its existing stockpile of spatial torps.  Also, the fact that the photonic torps actually have warning labels on them with specific handling instructions indicates that they are more dangerous to deal with than the older spatial torps.  Its conceivable that although Starfleet was willing to risk those dangers when an elite, experienced officer like Reed was the one handling the torps, but was less willing to risk using them in a hastily assembled wartime fleet.

The Romulans in Kirks time changed focused their design priorities towards making the cloak more practical, and developing the plasma torpedo.  Remember despite the Romulan's lack of speed, it wasn't exactly easy for Kirk to bring down the bird of prey.

The Voyage to the 1930s dealt with a different opponent so it did not erase the expanse.

People might have considered Cochrane's words about the borg to be drunk talk, and revisionist historians would have purged it from the record because it portrayed him in an unfavorable light.

Relations with the Klingons in Archer's time weren't hostile, but they weren't friendly either.  The way in which first contact occurred could very well have prevented a friendly dialogue from forming.

Picard had models of all "federation starships" named Enterprise in his ready room.  Making the series pre-federation was meant to skirt the fact that Kirk's Enterprise was the first federation starship to bear the name.

Also, the moment of the federation's birth can be one of those hazy historical debates.  Was it the  signing of the alliance, or was it the signing of the Federation Charter at a later date.