Topic: Busy Busy FoaS (A few TOS ships here and there) (Read 299320 times)

wulf111 · « **Reply #1080 on:** March 05, 2010, 02:02:41 pm »

dude those look amazing

Chrystoff · « **Reply #1081 on:** March 05, 2010, 03:01:53 pm »

**WOW**

Klingon Fanatic · « **Reply #1082 on:** March 05, 2010, 04:55:13 pm »

Awesome! Some sweet ships there!

Norsehound · « **Reply #1083 on:** March 05, 2010, 08:52:39 pm »

Gonna try your hand at freighters and starbases too, FoAS? Even if it's retextures of the stock models... for completion's sake?

marstone · « **Reply #1084 on:** March 06, 2010, 09:34:44 am »

Guess, I get to be the one to break the love fest. Sorry. not wild on the paint job. To my eye, just a bit to busy for a Klingon ship. A pirate klingon ship maybe.

Question, was there to be any images or something in the lightmap on the main hull? Or just general lights? Was wondering as it seems the whole command boom doesn't have a light, the lights by the engine light up the symbol, but the two on the hull are just there.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #1085 on:** March 06, 2010, 10:26:30 pm »

That's fair. I know this isn't for everyone.

Nope - just the glowy bits and those spot lights. Truth be told there's no good solid place to throw another light onto with the boom and have it convincing. I'm okay with it.

marstone · « **Reply #1086 on:** March 06, 2010, 10:34:49 pm »

I can live with it just being lights. Just looks alittle off balance with the boom so dark, but can understand no real good place for a light.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #1087 on:** March 06, 2010, 10:38:19 pm »

Another one of WZs to fit right into the mix

Starfox1701 · « **Reply #1088 on:** March 07, 2010, 08:00:23 am »

Nice; that one actually looks the part of a heavy battlecruiser.

Wicked Zombie · « **Reply #1089 on:** March 07, 2010, 09:53:20 am »

As well it should, otherwise all those weekends it spent at the gym would've gone to waste.

The C7's one of the few DRS ships that haven't made the dreaded "must be remade again" list so the fact you've managed to give some extra style to her makes it even better.

For those of you who aren't entirely fond of replacing the "standard" Klingons with these more colorful versions, you could incorporate these into the fleet as squadron leaders and flagships.

marstone · « **Reply #1090 on:** March 07, 2010, 10:40:01 am »

Quote from: Wicked Zombie on March 07, 2010, 09:53:20 am

As well it should, otherwise all those weekends it spent at the gym would've gone to waste.

The C7's one of the few DRS ships that haven't made the dreaded "must be remade again" list so the fact you've managed to give some extra style to her makes it even better.

For those of you who aren't entirely fond of replacing the "standard" Klingons with these more colorful versions, you could incorporate these into the fleet as squadron leaders and flagships.

true, you could use them as squadron leaders and such. Or just don't use them. Nice thing about the game, you have a choice of what your ships look like. Keep up the work FoaS, I like what you do, just not always what it is.

Klingon Fanatic · « **Reply #1091 on:** March 07, 2010, 12:32:33 pm »

I can't wait....

Chrystoff · « **Reply #1092 on:** March 07, 2010, 12:35:55 pm »

Quote from: Klingon Fanatic on March 07, 2010, 12:32:33 pm

I can't wait....

Me either! This is going to add some serious visual interest to the game!

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #1093 on:** March 07, 2010, 02:36:10 pm »

:-D

Another frigate for the fleet

Klingon Fanatic · « **Reply #1094 on:** March 07, 2010, 02:55:09 pm »

I take it the standard one engined verson of the FASA L' rexa will look just as awesome?

This is so awesome.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #1095 on:** March 07, 2010, 02:56:28 pm »

I'm really not a fan of the one nacelle version - that's why I made this guy instead.

Norsehound · « **Reply #1096 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:11:59 pm »

FoAS, you going to do starbases and freighters too?

Klingon Fanatic · « **Reply #1097 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:37:02 pm »

Minor point...

On your Federation and Mirak ships there are visual and physical differences in warp nacelle styles for at least some of the classes.

I miss Atras' C-7 warp engines for the C-7 variants.

I guess your Klingons and ISC are going for the utilitarian look.

I still can't wait to play with these fine ships.

Qapla'

KF

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #1098 on:** March 07, 2010, 09:46:19 pm »

Sorry, i didn't see your earlier post, norsehound. Starbases and fighters are an optional for me: I may do them, i may not - depends on how I feel at the time >.<.

KF - I Agree about the whole nacelle thing. I was going to use Gow's but they didn't sit right. I will go back and try atras.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #1099 on:** March 07, 2010, 11:59:55 pm »

Quote from: marstone on March 07, 2010, 10:40:01 am

Quote from: Wicked Zombie on March 07, 2010, 09:53:20 am
As well it should, otherwise all those weekends it spent at the gym would've gone to waste.

The C7's one of the few DRS ships that haven't made the dreaded "must be remade again" list so the fact you've managed to give some extra style to her makes it even better.

For those of you who aren't entirely fond of replacing the "standard" Klingons with these more colorful versions, you could incorporate these into the fleet as squadron leaders and flagships.

true, you could use them as squadron leaders and such. Or just don't use them. Nice thing about the game, you have a choice of what your ships look like. Keep up the work FoaS, I like what you do, just not always what it is.

I think the issue with the paint is more the fact that they look too shinny and new than anything else. If he can do some decent space weathering on them at some point I think those colors will work alot better. But, either way, I'm not going to turn them down

News:

Topic: Busy Busy FoaS (A few TOS ships here and there) (Read 299320 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Topic: Busy Busy FoaS (A few TOS ships here and there) (Read 299320 times)