Topic: Tracey G's "Alien Encounter" mission  (Read 2085 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Tracey G's "Alien Encounter" mission
« on: August 01, 2008, 08:43:36 am »
Does anyone remember why we stopped using this?   It was kid of a fun mission that broke up the monotanity.  Was it bugging in PvP or something silly like that?
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: Tracey G's "Alien Encounter" mission
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2008, 09:04:26 am »
The only bug was that you could get a pvp action and in that circumstance, the draftee would have his ship temporarily replaced with the Intruder! I call it a feature.  ;D

Offline KBF-Crim

  • 1st Deacon ,Church of Taldren
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 12271
  • Gender: Male
  • Crim,son of Rus'l
Re: Tracey G's "Alien Encounter" mission
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2008, 09:10:35 am »
The only bug was that you could get a pvp action and in that circumstance, the draftee would have his ship temporarily replaced with the Intruder! I call it a feature.  ;D

Ohhhh...that's actualy kinda cool....

That could be used for other types of flavor as well.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: Tracey G's "Alien Encounter" mission
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2008, 09:33:19 am »
The only bug was that you could get a pvp action and in that circumstance, the draftee would have his ship temporarily replaced with the Intruder! I call it a feature.  ;D

Ohhhh...that's actualy kinda cool....

That could be used for other types of flavor as well.

I guess it could be cool to add back under the condition that the disengagement rule DOES NOT apply in this mission.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .