Topic: Pseudo turn-based ISC conquest campaign?

[FPF-DieHard]

Through our hours of BSing on AOTK4, we came up with an idea of a pseudo-turn based ISC conquest campaign that might actually work.   This could be run on a Dyna that wouldn’t be 24/7, it would be up for a few hours a night and would primarily be a PvP server.

A “real” ISC conquest campaign could never work in the traditional D2 model because of hex-flipping and player numbers.   It would simply be retarded to try.  The ISC’s strong point is PvP, they are MONSTERS in that regard, especially in a fleet battle.  A turn-based game could work but is too slow to run and would never get off the ground.

So how do you get around this?  One simple, yet off the wall, rule.  Nobody is ALLOWED TO ATTACK ISC HEXES.  You can raise your DVs, you can defend the space the ISC is attacking, but you cannot counter-attack.  The Victory conditions for the ISC would be simple, conquest of the GW races.    The GW races victory would simply be to stop this from happening.

The idea behind this is to get PvP and lots of it.  Consider this a fun server, not a serious one, but try to win anyway.  In a serious D2 server, even ones like AOTK3/AOTK4 where we’re pretty much fighting over a 10x10 area it’s still often the best strategy to avoid PvP and attack where your opponent isn’t.  We all do this so nobody take offense to it.  The idea behind this is a simple slugfest, the only way to stop the ISC is to attack them where they are.

I’m thinking late era, 2283 start so we all have our cheese and the GW races have a prayer against the ISC.  Probably use a full, yet small OOB so killing something big will really matter. F&E style production model for re-building ships or we can just say F’it and not.  The fleeting rules will need to be adjusted and play-tested so this can get close to fair.

Is this worth pursuing?  Is there enough interest in this style of campaign?  Please post questions and comments as this hasn’t been fleshed out yet.

[Corbomite]

Whats this "we" stuff? I made one comment (as a joke) and you went off like a rocket!

People need to keep in mind that this would mean once a hex was ISC DV=1 that they could not attack it any more and the ISC would have no need to boost it. A system would have to be worked out for multiple missions at once resulting in the ISC flipping the hex, then Galactic Powers flipping it back to Neutral, then to an Empire color, back to Neutral etc.... Who owns it at that point? Perhaps a time frame of ownership like "The ISC must posses the hex for at least one turn" or something.

An on line player cap for the ISC would seem in order for something like this. If a majority of ISC are on the Empires have no hope as the ISC can attack where they aren't with no reprisal. Perhaps incredibly hard AI missions for the ISC only (if possible) could alleviate that issue somewhat.

It would seem that there would be no need to have VC's given to the ISC for PvP kills and disengagements, only for territory gained, but definitely PvP VC's for Empire kills and disengagements on the ISC. That way they can fight the bullies without having to worry about getting their bikes stolen. The same might be done for the Disengagement Timeout Penalty.

[FPF-DieHard]

Whats this "we" stuff? I made one comment (as a joke) and you went off like a rocket!

Come on, since when have I ever gone off on a tangent . . .

People need to keep in mind that this would mean once a hex was ISC DV=1 that they could not attack it any more and the ISC would have no need to boost it. A system would have to be worked out for multiple missions at once resulting in the ISC flipping the hex, then Galactic Powers flipping it back to Neutral, then to an Empire color, back to Neutral etc.... Who owns it at that point? Perhaps a time frame of ownership like "The ISC must posses the hex for at least one turn" or something.

Maybe once it's above DV2 ISC it can be considered "Pacified."

An on line player cap for the ISC would seem in order for something like this. If a majority of ISC are on the Empires have no hope as the ISC can attack where they aren't with no reprisal. Perhaps incredibly hard AI missions for the ISC only (if possible) could alleviate that issue somewhat.

We'll throw in a Kroma rule, players can go both ways.   If the ISC number gets above X people need to sign in as GW?   Maybe, need to flesh this out.

Tack a BPV increase (to be determine by playtesting) to all ISC ships and give the GW races AI real fighters and PFs.   That will slow the ISC down a lot.

It would seem that there would be no need to have VC's given to the ISC for PvP kills and disengagements, only for territory gained, but definitely PvP VC's for Empire kills and disengagements on the ISC. That way they can fight the bullies without having to worry about getting their bikes stolen.

That's a great idea.   The empires are fighting for their lives, if the ISC isn't.  "Optional wars" kinda don't sit well with democracies once the cost gets too high.  Most anit-ISC tactics require you to be suicidal anyway so you just have to yell "Leroy Jenkins!!!!" and charge.

I think the run-off points on AOTK4 were a failure.  We didn't get what I hoped we'd get out of it and all it did was piss people off.

[Corbomite]

People need to keep in mind that this would mean once a hex was ISC DV=1 that they could not attack it any more and the ISC would have no need to boost it. A system would have to be worked out for multiple missions at once resulting in the ISC flipping the hex, then Galactic Powers flipping it back to Neutral, then to an Empire color, back to Neutral etc.... Who owns it at that point? Perhaps a time frame of ownership like "The ISC must posses the hex for at least one turn" or something.

Maybe once it's above DV2 ISC it can be considered "Pacified."

You could literally have ten players running independent missions in one hex. Until people are caught in PvP and kicked out the hex will not stabilize. You need something unambiguous so the Empires know when to cut and run, even if it means running off the map in a mission just to save time.

[Lieutenant_Q]

I wouldn't worry about it until the next day.  Let the General War Powers run missions in hexes that flip that day.  When you take the server down at the end of the day, boost the DV of the hex to something like ten.  After that, then restrict their ability to run missions.

[FPF-DieHard]

I wouldn't worry about it until the next day.  Let the General War Powers run missions in hexes that flip that day.  When you take the server down at the end of the day, boost the DV of the hex to something like ten.  After that, then restrict their ability to run missions.

Too much work, seriously it's pain in  the ass to do DB edits.

[Corbomite]

Good idea, but that could involve a lot of hexes.

The ownership at the end of the day thing might work though.

[Corbomite]

Oh, and maybe no X-Ships for the ISC.

[FPF-DieHard]

If we went SQL, it wouldn't be that bad.   Heck, this type of war SCREAMS for it.  And our player population shouldn't cause the server to barf when we get less than 20 at the most.

With SQL we could do a real OOB and production as well.   I expect there to be a lot of attrition and high PvP with this model of server.

One thing that could cause concern is that lack of use for smaller ships.   With this type of a setup people's best bet would be to grab the biggest legal fleet possible and hammer away or sit rock when defending.  Non-stop heavy metal fights can get a little tedious.  I'd love to see K-D5LR, K-D5DR, K-D5KR (or if you're feeling "Blue" F-CLC, F-NCDR, F-NCLR) versus I-CSP, I-CLZ, I-CLZ  at once point in the server.  I'd like to come up with some kind of way for this to happen without being artificial.

Perhaps if a "small ship" fleet is kicked out of a hex they are allowed to return in larger ships (once)?  Maybe "small" ships must be the first to attack a  hex, kinda like a scouting party for before the main fleet arrives?     

[FPF-DieHard]

Oh, and maybe no X-Ships for the ISC.

I was thinking the only X-ships could be the F-CX and K-DX like they had in the original SFB.  Neither of those ships are OTT and interestingly enough cost 12 EP to building in F&E.  The same as an I-CCZ . . .

Rules for partial X-refits in SFB just came out, I need to order that book . . ., some of that might make sense here. 

[Corbomite]

Perhaps if a "small ship" fleet is kicked out of a hex they are allowed to return in larger ships (once)?  Maybe "small" ships must be the first to attack a  hex, kinda like a scouting party for before the main fleet arrives?     

It would be unrealistic to try and coordinate this. Perhaps there should be no loss of points or time if killed or chased off in anything smaller than a CA (for both sides). I know the Disengagement Rule was initially intended to keep small Droners at bay, but on this type of server they won't matter as much and if they keep dying they won't have enough to buy a ship after awhile (especially if you keep the replacement ship small and useless). You just have to make sure all missions count a Disengagement as a loss and correctly shift the DV.

[Lieutenant_Q]

perhaps make it so that small ships killed by small ships are worth more points?

[FPF-DieHard]

Perhaps if a "small ship" fleet is kicked out of a hex they are allowed to return in larger ships (once)?  Maybe "small" ships must be the first to attack a  hex, kinda like a scouting party for before the main fleet arrives?     

It would be unrealistic to try and coordinate this. Perhaps there should be no loss of points or time if killed or chased off in anything smaller than a CA (for both sides). I know the Disengagement Rule was initially intended to keep small Droners at bay, but on this type of server they won't matter as much and if they keep dying they won't have enough to buy a ship after awhile (especially if you keep the replacement ship small and useless). You just have to make sure all missions count a Disengagement as a loss and correctly shift the DV.

That could make sense.   Also, if we use full F&E OOB/production 80% of the ships built will be smaller than 1 move cost.

It also makes sense Killing ISC ships is worth VCs but dying isn't.  3 CWs on a suicide run might be able to nail a smaller escort ship before dying.

[el-Karnak]

If we went SQL, it wouldn't be that bad.   Heck, this type of war SCREAMS for it.  And our player population shouldn't cause the server to barf when we get less than 20 at the most.

With SQL we could do a real OOB and production as well.   I expect there to be a lot of attrition and high PvP with this model of server.

One thing that could cause concern is that lack of use for smaller ships.   With this type of a setup people's best bet would be to grab the biggest legal fleet possible and hammer away or sit rock when defending.  Non-stop heavy metal fights can get a little tedious.  I'd love to see K-D5LR, K-D5DR, K-D5KR (or if you're feeling "Blue" F-CLC, F-NCDR, F-NCLR) versus I-CSP, I-CLZ, I-CLZ  at once point in the server.  I'd like to come up with some kind of way for this to happen without being artificial.

Perhaps if a "small ship" fleet is kicked out of a hex they are allowed to return in larger ships (once)?  Maybe "small" ships must be the first to attack a  hex, kinda like a scouting party for before the main fleet arrives?     

I would use SQL.

[Lieutenant_Q]

Anyway you can make a certain mission a pre-requisite for any missions?

For example, you can't run any missions in a hex until a scout mission is run?

[FPF-DieHard]

Anyway you can make a certain mission a pre-requisite for any missions?

For example, you can't run any missions in a hex until a scout mission is run?

Not possible with this version of SFC, good idea for SFC4.

people, this is a peanut gallery post, a fishing expedition.   All ideas are welcome, even if you think this sucks please tell me why.

[Lepton]

Well, you know that I have suggested an all PvP dynaverse server since time immemorial and have been roundly shouted down.  "This won't work".  "You suck".  "We hate that idea."  If one of the dynaverse illuminati can suggest it and make it work, then I am all for it.  Just take every criticism that has been leveled at my suggestions in the past and figure out how to counter them.  That's all that was required of me when I made such suggestions.  So if you can do that, people will be on board.  If not, then you suck.

My one stipulation would be that DH and Corbo cannot be stacked up on the ISC side as this whole thing will be no contest.

Essentially, you are suggesting that we use the dynaverse as a game-matching service in lieu of GameSpy with the dynaverse database backend keeping track of things.  If it can be done, I am all for it.  At this point, I don't think that I will ever be participating in a standard dynaverse campaign again, so if we can get a PvP campaign going then that sounds great to me.

[FPF-DieHard]

Well, you know that I have suggested an all PvP dynaverse server since time immemorial and have been roundly shouted down.  "This won't work".  "You suck".  "We hate that idea."  If one of the dynaverse illuminati can suggest it and make it work, then I am all for it.  Just take every criticism that has been leveled at my suggestions in the past and figure out how to counter them.  That's all that was required of me when I made such suggestions.  So if you can do that, people will be on board.  If not, then you suck.

To be honest, it's because nobody suggested Corbo's idea of not being able to counterattack the aggressor.  I simply never thought of it, nobody else had either.  I don't think this rule would work for most campaigns either, but for an ISC invasion it's perfect.

There's nothing wrong with a hex-flipping server either, this is just something a little bit different we can try for a 2 week diversion.  People should look at it as PvP training/practice.

My one stipulation would be that DH and Corbo cannot be stacked up on the ISC side as this whole thing will be no contest.

This is negotiable.  As I stated earlier we will have to tweak the fleeting rules so this can be fair for all sides involved. 

Essentially, you are suggesting that we use the dynaverse as a game-matching service in lieu of GameSpy with the dynaverse database backend keeping track of things.  If it can be done, I am all for it.  At this point, I don't think that I will ever be participating in a standard dynaverse campaign again, so if we can get a PvP campaign going then that sounds great to me.

Cool, that's one skeptic sold, next!

[Leto Atreides]

i only see one problem. if it's based on a few hours per day, that's great for people in that timezone. there are people worldwide that play.

how about 2 shifts to alleviate the other side.

[KBF MalaK]

Fishing eh ?

Back in the day when I had time to play SFB I spent most of my time practicing convoy raids/convoy defense and battling monsters in vanilla Fed cl/ca's until I moved on to pirate ships. Since there's no 'real' pirate ships in OP (as well as no Tholians) I'm back to thinking about convoys-

If you're ISC hexes can't be flipped back to another race, where's the battles going to be ? The front.

I'm not thrilled with that situation as the frontline ships need supplies and repair and thats where I'd prefer to hit them. One may not always KNOW there are ships on the front but surely there's ships in the shipping lanes between the held planets, bases, distribution depot's, etc. I have yet to see a convoy escort mission in a D2 campaign and I think it has lots of possibilities for PVP action. What if you could starve a base hex or planet for a few weeks (in SFC:OP time), would the hex be abandoned by the ISC and revert back to neutral ?? Maybe capture a few cargo ships with supplies the non ISC races could use ?? maybe a diplomat or 2 ?? Capturing a few gucci weapons would be nice but as pirate ship option mounts aren't implimented in OP they'd be useless- unless you could sell them on the black market for PP points. These cargo ships are going to REQUIRE escorts manned by live players, and live players are going to raid these convoys as well as fight the heavies at the front lines. That should be enough to maintain a good balance of heavies and 'wolf pack' raiders.

Some editing will need to be maintained on the map to define the shipping lanes between captured facilities as well as some custom mission creation (I hope to be able to help with that) but I don't think much new content will need to be created (c'ept maybe a random cargo manifest for the convoys).

Just an idea.