Software EULAs (End user license agreements) have recently been a topic of discusion here. (In
this thread for example). I'm curious what the feelings of people are on the topic.
Should software EULAs be considered valid or should software just be under copyright law like books?Option 1: EULAs should be explicitly legalized by legislation
In other words do you think that the EULA system as in place is reasonable and should be explicitly made legal rather than just the assumption of legality that we have now?
Option 2: EULAs should be allowed but the terms restricted by legislation
Should they be legalized but laws put in place to restrict the terms. For example you might wish to remove the terms that often prohibit reviews of software without the permission of the authors (which blocks negative reviews) Let us know in what way you think they should be restricted.
Option 3: Special copyright laws should be set up for software
In essence you think that software is sufficiently different from other types of copyrightied materials and needs special rules. Please post what you think they need as special protections or restriction.
Option 4: EULAs should be declared invalid and software regulated like other copyrighted material.
My choice. You think that software authors should not be able to use the system of EULAs currently in place to restrict the rights of customers beyond what copyright law itself restricts them.
Option 5: None of the above
You think my poll missed the boat in some way and believe another option should have been there. Please let me know what you think I missed.
Option 6: Blame Punisher.
Obviously it is his fault but not really relevant to the discusion.