Topic: Good court rulings on patent and software licensing limitations.  (Read 1659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Link to full article

Quote
In the case before the Supreme Court, a South Korean company, LG Electronics Inc., licensed some of its patents to Intel Corp.

LG then sued some of Intel's customers for patent infringement, saying they owed royalties to LG because the customers combined Intel's microprocessors and chipsets with non-Intel products.


The judge ruled against LG and in favour of the customers.    Having a patent holder able to restrict what you could do with a device that you bought merely because they had a patent on the device is unreasonable and the judge agreed.

Add this to the recent support of a buyers right to resell software in the case brought by Autodesk over Autocad being resold on E-Bay and the courts seem to be going in the right direction on both patents and copyrights.

Link to full article

Quote
Software companies have long claimed that software is not sold to users but licensed, and many software licences forbid the resale of the software. A Seattle District Court has found, though, that the packages of software in question were sold, not licensed, and that the licence is not binding on subsequent buyers.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline Rod ONeal

  • D.Net Beta Tester
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3592
  • Gender: Male
Re: Good court rulings on patent and software licensing limitations.
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2008, 05:28:06 am »
About time. Software is such a racket!

How about they rule that the software should actually perform as intended. The manufacturers should have to fix buggy software for free. Not sell you an updated version in order to get bug fixes on the version that you've already paid for. That'd be nice too.
If Romulans aren't cowards, then why do they taste like chicken?

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: Good court rulings on patent and software licensing limitations.
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2008, 01:40:11 pm »
Apparently a century ago the book publishers tried the same thing with a license and the courts eventually threw it out.  We can hope that the courts will do the same for software licenses and such patent nonsense as this.  We can also hope that the politicians don't change the laws to enforce such licenses.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline marstone

  • Because I can
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3014
  • Gender: Male
  • G.E.C.K. - The best kit to have
    • Ramblings on the Q3, blog
Re: Good court rulings on patent and software licensing limitations.
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2008, 04:22:56 pm »
from what I was taught, software is suppose to work like books.  You have sole use of it, but can sell or lend it out.  But this was from years and years ago, hopefully the courts will go back to this idea.
The smell of printer ink in the morning,
Tis the smell of programming.