Topic: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone  (Read 12489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Herr Burt

  • Guest
DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« on: March 11, 2003, 06:24:59 pm »
Wow, I'm still alive.  All-righty then, best-beloved, let's talk about escorts.



ESCORTS ARE VITAL FOR DOE

With all the (SFB-style) fighers available in DOE, I've found that escorts are going to be absolutely essential for all navies.  We all know that escorts in the past have created lots of controversy and most of us remember why.  I've no desire to go back to THAT flame!

But what to do?  I'm sticking to my plans to take as many rules server-side rather than player-side as possible, so I've taken a different approach than building a complex set of CnC rules.  Rather than restrict access to escorts based upon flagship and rank, I've expanded access to everyone.  I have also added several escorts to every hull class of all three fleets.


I WANT AS FEW PLAYER-SIDE RULES AS POSSIBLE

The key to my solution were the Gorn and Romulan escorts.  Who wants to fly a Gorn and Romulan escorts as a solo ship?  No one with any sense!  Taldren's incomplete coding of the Plasma-D weapons system means that Gorn and Romulan escorts trade off most (if not all) of their heavy firepower to gain escort abilities.  The key to solving the escort "problem" was making Federation escorts work with the same philosophy as the other two fleets.

Thus, all Escort Ship G-racks have been converted to full defensive loads.  In SFB, the G-rack was a single, dual-use missile system that usually carried two reloads of offensive drones and a single reload of defensive drones.  If you expected a lot of defensive work, you could alter this ratio.  Whatever your ratio,  however, you always had to work in *either* offensive or defensive mode for an entire turn.  Taldren eased their modeling by giving Fed and Klingon ships with G-racks two weapons systems instead of one, and thus allowed G-rack ships to perform both funcitons simultaneously.  Taldren's offensive system came with two reloads and their defensive one with a single reload.  I've merged these back into a single system (as in SFB) with a full three defensive loads.

Note again, this is for Escorts Only! So don't get your panties in a knot over the rest of the Fed fleet.

The other change I have made for escorts is deleting things like the Federation NEC (which served on the Fed/Klink border) and instead introducing escorts like the Federation NER, which was the same ship refitted to serve on the Romulan border.  


ALL'S FAIR IN LOVE AND CHEESE
Now everyone's escorts operate the same, and they are freely available at all times.  They will be very good at their intended purpose and will be generally  poor at any other.

THE ESCORT (NON) RULES:
*If you want escorts, buy as many as you can find!  No restriction.
*  If you lose your capital ship, don't worry about it!  There is no longer any need for a rule that requires you to stay off the front until you are back in a real warship.  Any "cheese" arguements have been pre-empted.  Feel free to fly as wingman for any friends who need an escort, or do whatever else you like.

THE SOLE CnC RULE
Experimentation with this philosophy over the weekend gave results I was pleased with.  It did, however, lead me to the one CnC rule which will be in force during Day of the Eagle.  With SFB-style fighters, I feel the following rule is needed: No player may have more than one carrier of any kind within their fleet.

WHAT IS A CARRIER?
A carrier is any ship capable of carrying fighters, and on the Eastern Front this designation should cause no confusion.  While drogues are puchased in the fighter interface, they are NOT fighters and do not make their ships carriers.  What is a carrier and what is not should be as complicated as a brick, but feel free to toss bricks my way if you are ever feeling confused.  

There.  Now, back to my flameproof bunker.

-Herr Burt the Hider  

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2003, 06:44:07 pm »
Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.

J'inn

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2003, 06:51:42 pm »
<J'inn runs in with his spectating equipment>


Now this is more like it!!

 

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2003, 07:22:20 pm »
Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2003, 07:41:56 pm »
Well for a start there aren't enough rules. Where are the advanced rules for co-op missions with carriers executed in the Holdfast between the hours of 12 AM and 6 AM AEST.

Otherwise what's to say except "Bring it on"?  

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2003, 08:17:15 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)  




Come on Kroma, Like the Gorn BCH ain't tough enough!  

TheMaverick

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2003, 08:33:30 pm »
Here we go again...

Green

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2003, 08:34:56 pm »
HB,

I like the tweaked shiplist.  It is, after all, an experiment.  4P worked well, and I hope this one does also.  You've provided a run-down (for the most part) for the Rom ships.  Can you do the same for the Gorn and Federation?

Please ignore the comments from DH123 who, based upon his Taldren forum join date of 2/27/03, is undoubtedly some n00b who just bought the game and normaly spends his time on the SFC3 Act-B server and wandered over here by mistake.  







Sorry DH ... couldn't resist.  That plus J'inn paid me.

Cmdr. Krotz

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2003, 08:50:01 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)  




Come on Kroma, Like the Gorn BCH ain't tough enough!    




I for one think that Herr Burt's approach to matters have been well thought out, and his answers to this point have been quite cogent   , and the BCH is simply a non-factor in the era in-question.  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2003, 09:12:12 pm »
Quote:


I like the tweaked shiplist.  It is, after all, an experiment.  4P worked well, and I hope this one does also.  You've provided a run-down (for the most part) for the Rom ships.  Can you do the same for the Gorn and Federation?



Yes details please. hmmmm....>Gorn CV or CVS I pray.
Quote:


Please ignore the comments from DH123 who, based upon his Taldren forum join date of 2/27/03, is undoubtedly some n00b who just bought the game and normaly spends his time on the SFC3 Act-B server and wandered over here by mistake.  
 



He's probably a 15 year old n00b Fed too.

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2003, 09:57:51 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


I like the tweaked shiplist.  It is, after all, an experiment.  4P worked well, and I hope this one does also.  You've provided a run-down (for the most part) for the Rom ships.  Can you do the same for the Gorn and Federation?



Yes details please. hmmmm....>Gorn CV or CVS I pray.
Quote:


Please ignore the comments from DH123 who, based upon his Taldren forum join date of 2/27/03, is undoubtedly some n00b who just bought the game and normaly spends his time on the SFC3 Act-B server and wandered over here by mistake.  
 



He's probably a 15 year old n00b Fed too.  




Errm... to save you from LOTS of flames.... check the petition sigs guys....  anything but a n00b there that's for sure
What do you think DH stands for anyway???

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2003, 10:01:59 pm »
Quote:



Please ignore the comments from DH123 who, based upon his Taldren forum join date of 2/27/03, is undoubtedly some n00b who just bought the game and normaly spends his time on the SFC3 Act-B server and wandered over here by mistake.  

 




That Act-A thank you very much!!!  

 

Herr Burt

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2003, 10:19:22 pm »
Quote:


Errm... to save you from LOTS of flames.... anything but a n00b there that's for sure




A wink is as good as a nod to a blind bat.  These people know who is whom, they're just having a little fun.  


Kroma:  The G-CV is present and accounted for.  As are the HDV, and G-8, G-10, G-18, and G-20  fighters.  You'll also see a few new escorts.

The Feds will get the addition of the Medium Carrier, several escorts, INDIVIDUAL PHOTON HARDPOINTS, F-14's, F-15's, F-16's, F-18's, and A-10's.  The Romulan border versions of the DE and NEC (the DER and NER) appear.

Other ships appear, as do drogues, and most ships have had the 'B' put back into their SFC.  But this is a huge list and I don't have the time to detail it now.  I'm gone for the next couple of days.  Shiplists (no matter how calm) always have flames, and I'd rather that happen when I'm around to listen and respond to concerns of the players.

So, again, be patient.    The balloon goes up next Friday.  Or else I eat dirt.

-Herr Burt  

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2003, 10:24:13 pm »
Quote:


What do you think DH stands for anyway???  




Heh too easy! Richard Head?????

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2003, 10:27:59 pm »
I believe you mean Richard Cranium.

FatherTed

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2003, 10:29:28 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


Errm... to save you from LOTS of flames.... anything but a n00b there that's for sure




A wink is as good as a nod to a blind bat.  These people know who is whom, they're just having a little fun.  


Kroma:  The G-CV is present and accounted for.  As are the HDV, and G-8, G-10, G-18, and G-20  fighters.  You'll also see a few new escorts.

The Feds will get the addition of the Medium Carrier, several escorts, INDIVIDUAL PHOTON HARDPOINTS, F-14's, F-15's, F-16's, F-18's, and A-10's. The Romulan border versions of the DE and NEC (the DER and NER) appear.

Other ships appear, as do drogues, and most ships have had the 'B' put back into their SFC.  But this is a huge list and I don't have the time to detail it now.  I'm gone for the next couple of days.  Shiplists (no matter how calm) always have flames, and I'd rather that happen when I'm around to listen and respond to concerns of the players.

So, again, be patient.    The balloon goes up next Friday.  Or else I eat dirt.

-Herr Burt  




Oh great. You tell me about this after I already promised to fly Bruce.    

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2003, 10:35:35 pm »
So Rich or whomever you are  , you going to fly those sweet cheese F-14 Tomcats or just leave them in the hanger as a matter of principle.  

Makes me almost want to fly fred.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2003, 10:59:23 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


What do you think DH stands for anyway???  




Heh too easy! Richard Head?????  




Die Herburtt  

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2003, 12:36:31 am »
Quote:

<J'inn runs in with his spectating equipment>


Now this is more like it!!

 




Pops my head in quickly to take a look... oh my, llok at all those A-10 Heavy Fighters being churned out of the shipyards...

Did some mention G-racks??

But oh wait, there's more... I dont't believe it... escorts have been mentioned too!!
Pulls up an esky beside J'inn who thoughtfully is sitting at a safe distance.

"Pass me the binoculars."

Mog

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2003, 03:12:58 am »
Re fighters: is there going to be any attempt at having SFB fighter complements or is everyone just going to load up with all F14s, or plasmaF Gladiators etc, rather than F14s only being on the CVA, and Roms having a 50/50 split between plasmaF armed fighters and plasmaD armed fighters? Are the Gorn fighters going to be plasma armed or drone armed?

KATChuutRitt

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2003, 04:36:39 am »
Escourts?

I got my Angels, what more escort could I need?

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2003, 06:13:42 am »
Quote:

Escourts?

I got my Angels, what more escort could I need?  




Well said Chuut, well said!

SPQR Renegade001

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2003, 06:28:38 am »
Quote:

....and Roms having a 50/50 split between plasmaF armed fighters and plasmaD armed fighters?  




Why would I want to use a Plas-D armed fighter in SFC? If Dro-D wasn't so broken in Mid, we might be talking though...

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2003, 07:28:06 am »
I want CHEESE!!! I want CHEESE!!! I wa..n..t.....

<runs away>

Mog

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2003, 07:41:39 am »
Renegade, I understand your point, and I know what the answer will be anyway. Just thought the question needed asking anyway. As for fighters with defensive only plasma D, I can think of a good use for them - killing enemy fighters/drones, as theyt were intended to do.

 

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2003, 08:47:35 am »
Agreed.

Quote:

Renegade, I understand your point, and I know what the answer will be anyway. Just thought the question needed asking anyway. As for fighters with defensive only plasma D, I can think of a good use for them - killing enemy fighters/drones, as theyt were intended to do.

 



KOTH-Steel Claw

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2003, 08:52:01 am »
::Sniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiifffffff:: Ahh, good ol' Smellveta!

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2003, 09:00:04 am »
Quote:

I want CHEESE!!! I want CHEESE!!! I wa..n..t.....

<runs away>  




J'inn lowers the binoculars from his face and peers out across the battlefield.

"Do you see that lone figure running over there?"

Taking the binoculars, TraceyG finds the individual and zooms in.

"Why yes... in a Federation uniform.. it looks like..."

Just then, a scream of engines was heard to rumble overhead as a wing of F-14s came thundering in on an attack run.
Snatching the binoculars back, J'inn says, "I gotta see this!"

In moments, the F-14 squadron had found they're target and unloaded their payload, a direct hit.

"Six large crates of ghouda, edam, and I think a few barrels of good ole cottage cheese as well. Oooooh, that had to hurt..."

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2003, 09:07:51 am »
Congrats everyone.  We may top AOTK in the amount of cheese!  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2003, 09:10:43 am »
Quote:

Congrats everyone.  We may top AOTK in the amount of cheese!  




Well since AOTK was a blast, I take it you approve. hmmmmmm....cheese is good.

Laflin

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #30 on: March 12, 2003, 09:22:24 am »
I am somewhat apprehensive about these changes - fighters are far more vulnerable to phaser and PlasD than PFs are to phaser/drones.  I don't understand the NEC removal, being as the drone is the only real Fed defense against PlasF armed PF.  Something tells me that there are going to be a whole lot of unhappy people after a week or so...  

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #31 on: March 12, 2003, 09:22:52 am »
Quote:

Quote:

I want CHEESE!!! I want CHEESE!!! I wa..n..t.....

<runs away>  




J'inn lowers the binoculars from his face and peers out across the battlefield.

"Do you see that lone figure running over there?"

Taking the binoculars, TraceyG finds the individual and zooms in.

"Why yes... in a Federation uniform.. it looks like..."

Just then, a scream of engines was heard to rumble overhead as a wing of F-14s came thundering in on an attack run.
Snatching the binoculars back, J'inn says, "I gotta see this!"

In moments, the F-14 squadron had found they're target and unloaded their payload, a direct hit.

"Six large crates of ghouda, edam, and I think a few barrels of good ole cottage cheese as well. Oooooh, that had to hurt..."  





Tracey walks up to the pile of cheese in various forms. The pile begins to move, Kimberly sits up slightly dazed...

"Now.... where's the burgandy.... I gotta have my burgandy.... and crackers....."

Kimberly passes out

Tracey raised an eyebrow, shakes her head and decides that she had better move to a safer spot just in case the burgandy shipment comes in.

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #32 on: March 12, 2003, 09:28:32 am »
Quote:

.  I don't understand the NEC removal, being as the drone is the only real Fed defense against PlasF armed PF.  



What PlasF armed PFs? I believe there are no PFs in this campaign.

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #33 on: March 12, 2003, 09:30:46 am »
Quote:

I am somewhat apprehensive about these changes - fighters are far more vulnerable to phaser and PlasD than PFs are to phaser/drones.  I don't understand the NEC removal, being as the drone is the only real Fed defense against PlasF armed PF.  Something tells me that there are going to be a whole lot of unhappy people after a week or so...  




I don't think there will be any PF's involved in this mini-campaign.  So fears of PF cheese shouldn't be an issue.  And since the only little friend bad guys will be enemy fighters AMD's will be just as effective as D racks.

Mog

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #34 on: March 12, 2003, 09:34:05 am »
Laflin, it's fighters for all races - no PFs, hence the AMD/drone rack change on fed escorts. Escorts are intended to DEFEND friendly ships, not ATTACK enemy ships which is why they are called cheesy :P

FPF_TraceyG

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #35 on: March 12, 2003, 09:36:06 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I want CHEESE!!! I want CHEESE!!! I wa..n..t.....

<runs away>  




J'inn lowers the binoculars from his face and peers out across the battlefield.

"Do you see that lone figure running over there?"

Taking the binoculars, TraceyG finds the individual and zooms in.

"Why yes... in a Federation uniform.. it looks like..."

Just then, a scream of engines was heard to rumble overhead as a wing of F-14s came thundering in on an attack run.
Snatching the binoculars back, J'inn says, "I gotta see this!"

In moments, the F-14 squadron had found they're target and unloaded their payload, a direct hit.

"Six large crates of ghouda, edam, and I think a few barrels of good ole cottage cheese as well. Oooooh, that had to hurt..."  





Tracey walks up to the pile of cheese in various forms. The pile begins to move, Kimberly sits up slightly dazed...

"Now.... where's the burgandy.... I gotta have my burgandy.... and crackers....."

Kimberly passes out

Tracey raised an eyebrow, shakes her head and decides that she had better move to a safer spot just in case the burgandy shipment comes in.  




"What?? You ordered whine with the cheese as well??"

Up in the sky, the F-!4 squadron is making a slow arc, cartwheeling around for a second attack run.

TraceyG starts running...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tracey Greenough »

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #36 on: March 12, 2003, 10:05:57 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Congrats everyone.  We may top AOTK in the amount of cheese!  




Well since AOTK was a blast, I take it you approve. hmmmmmm....cheese is good.  




Is anything going to be done to limit carrier proliferation?  

I know with the Fedration, the CVS+ and NVS are not as good, without the fighters, as their standard command counterparts.   How do the Gorn/Tholian/Romulan Strike Carriers compare?

 

Laflin

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #37 on: March 12, 2003, 10:09:32 am »
Quote:

Laflin, it's fighters for all races - no PFs, hence the AMD/drone rack change on fed escorts. Escorts are intended to DEFEND friendly ships, not ATTACK enemy ships which is why they are called cheesy :P  




Thanks for the clarification - and don't get me started on escort tactics.  

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #38 on: March 12, 2003, 10:44:51 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Congrats everyone.  We may top AOTK in the amount of cheese!  




Well since AOTK was a blast, I take it you approve. hmmmmmm....cheese is good.  




Is anything going to be done to limit carrier proliferation?  

I know with the Fedration, the CVS+ and NVS are not as good, without the fighters, as their standard command counterparts.   How do the Gorn/Tholian/Romulan Strike Carriers compare?

   




The Gorn CV is based on the CL and retains all of the armament which means with an F-refit it could be dangerous.
The HDV is based on the HDD and like the HDP losses the S-Torp so it's not a big threat.
The Roms on the other hand use the same Sparrowhawk/Skyhawk style carriers not losing much in the way of weapons.
 The Fed carriers should do fine.  The 2 you mentioned seem pretty decent in my trials of them.

This info is all purely from SFB so what Herr Burt is doing may be different.

Tholian carriers should compare well against the others.

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #39 on: March 12, 2003, 10:52:16 am »
What race is he replacing with Tholians???  Are they going to be non-player or is it an admin thing?

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #40 on: March 12, 2003, 11:11:28 am »
Quote:



The Gorn CV is based on the CL and retains all of the armament which means with an F-refit it could be dangerous.
The HDV is based on the HDD and like the HDP losses the S-Torp so it's not a big threat.
The Roms on the other hand use the same Sparrowhawk/Skyhawk style carriers not losing much in the way of weapons.
 The Fed carriers should do fine.  The 2 you mentioned seem pretty decent in my trials of them.
 




If he is going straight SFB, which I suspect, then the G-CV is a CL with 2xPlas-S plus 2xPlas-Fs replaced with 2xPlas-Ds, 4xPh1 and 2xPh3. HDV is just HDP with fighters instead of PFs.

The Roms would seem to have the adv in carrier mothership firepower. Slightly better than Feds and way better than the Gorn, but with the Gorn and Feds allied shouldn't be a big problem. Although the G-CVS would have been nice as it has a CA hull and 3 more Ph1s.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Kroma_BaSyl »

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #41 on: March 12, 2003, 11:15:03 am »
Hey Burt, you using any of the carriers from J2??

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #42 on: March 12, 2003, 01:00:21 pm »
Quote:

Quote:



The Gorn CV is based on the CL and retains all of the armament which means with an F-refit it could be dangerous.
The HDV is based on the HDD and like the HDP losses the S-Torp so it's not a big threat.
The Roms on the other hand use the same Sparrowhawk/Skyhawk style carriers not losing much in the way of weapons.
 The Fed carriers should do fine.  The 2 you mentioned seem pretty decent in my trials of them.
 




If he is going straight SFB, which I suspect, then the G-CV is a CL with 2xPlas-S plus 2xPlas-Fs replaced with 2xPlas-Ds, 4xPh1 and 2xPh3. HDV is just HDP with fighters instead of PFs.

The Roms would seem to have the adv in carrier mothership firepower. Slightly better than Feds and way better than the Gorn, but with the Gorn and Feds allied shouldn't be a big problem. Although the G-CVS would have been nice as it has a CA hull and 3 more Ph1s.  




Which means every player will be flying a fricking carrier.  

The Federation CVS+ has 34 power.  Decent weaponry, but that sad power supply is why I never fly it even over a CC+.  Personal prefernece I guess.  But I guess it's an ubber-ship because Dizzy killed S'cipio's dread with one  

BTW . . .  I'm flying Romulan on this server. Muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #43 on: March 12, 2003, 01:08:46 pm »
Quote:

Which means every player will be flying a fricking carrier.




Yes, but only one ;-)

I will probably give the G-CV and those fighters a spin, but I suspect I will be spending most of my time in a G-BF. The G-BF should be in it's sweet spot all of this server given the era.

Bob Graham

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #44 on: March 12, 2003, 01:20:44 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



The Gorn CV is based on the CL and retains all of the armament which means with an F-refit it could be dangerous.
The HDV is based on the HDD and like the HDP losses the S-Torp so it's not a big threat.
The Roms on the other hand use the same Sparrowhawk/Skyhawk style carriers not losing much in the way of weapons.
 The Fed carriers should do fine.  The 2 you mentioned seem pretty decent in my trials of them.
 




If he is going straight SFB, which I suspect, then the G-CV is a CL with 2xPlas-S plus 2xPlas-Fs replaced with 2xPlas-Ds, 4xPh1 and 2xPh3. HDV is just HDP with fighters instead of PFs.

The Roms would seem to have the adv in carrier mothership firepower. Slightly better than Feds and way better than the Gorn, but with the Gorn and Feds allied shouldn't be a big problem. Although the G-CVS would have been nice as it has a CA hull and 3 more Ph1s.  




Which means every player will be flying a fricking carrier.  

The Federation CVS+ has 34 power.  Decent weaponry, but that sad power supply is why I never fly it even over a CC+.  Personal prefernece I guess.  But I guess it's an ubber-ship because Dizzy killed S'cipio's dread with one  

BTW . . .  I'm flying Romulan on this server. Muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha  




The CVS+ is a kick ass ship, I beat some Romulan in a K9 with it and an AI G-DD durning CW6 I belive.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #45 on: March 12, 2003, 02:28:09 pm »
Quote:



I will probably give the G-CV and those fighters a spin, but I suspect I will be spending most of my time in a G-BF. The G-BF should be in it's sweet spot all of this server given the era.  




The FHK is looking good to me.  Now if only Herbert would lower the Cloak cost to 12 . . . .  

Laflin

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #46 on: March 12, 2003, 02:40:52 pm »
Quote:

Quote:



I will probably give the G-CV and those fighters a spin, but I suspect I will be spending most of my time in a G-BF. The G-BF should be in it's sweet spot all of this server given the era.  




The FHK is looking good to me.  Now if only Herbert would lower the Cloak cost to 12 . . . .  




I have nothing to do with cloak costs...  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #47 on: March 12, 2003, 02:43:11 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



I will probably give the G-CV and those fighters a spin, but I suspect I will be spending most of my time in a G-BF. The G-BF should be in it's sweet spot all of this server given the era.  




The FHK is looking good to me.  Now if only Herbert would lower the Cloak cost to 12 . . . .  




I have nothing to do with cloak costs...  




hehehe....He means Her Butt.

As for lowering cloak cost, I'm all for it, maybe it would encourage more Roms to cloak....muhahahahahahahaha!

KOTH-Steel Claw

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #48 on: March 12, 2003, 03:07:17 pm »
 
Quote:

 hehehe....He means Her Butt.

As for lowering cloak cost, I'm all for it, maybe it would encourage more Roms to cloak....muhahahahahahahaha!
 




Romulan cloaking is a good thing. I encourage all of them to use it.  

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #49 on: March 12, 2003, 03:19:22 pm »
Quote:

 
Quote:

 hehehe....He means Her Butt.

As for lowering cloak cost, I'm all for it, maybe it would encourage more Roms to cloak....muhahahahahahahaha!
 




Romulan cloaking is a good thing. I encourage all of them to use it.  




Drop Cloak costs by 1/3 and it would be very useful . . .  

Damaged

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #50 on: March 12, 2003, 03:38:02 pm »
Bravo HB.

Pharoah

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #51 on: March 12, 2003, 04:04:40 pm »
Just a quick note. From tests I've run previously, it seems the last patch for EAW made the Plas D nonfunctional as a fighter weapon. You can load it on a fighter, but it never fires.

I just double checked this to be sure.

Thus, no plas D fighters for the Gorn or Roms.  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #52 on: March 12, 2003, 04:09:21 pm »
Ouch. To bad cause they do work on PFs and are quite effective against fighters. Of course the PFs refuse to use their other heavy weapons against fighters (i.e. Plas-F) and refuse to target mothership if fighters are present.

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #53 on: March 12, 2003, 04:15:17 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Laflin, it's fighters for all races - no PFs, hence the AMD/drone rack change on fed escorts. Escorts are intended to DEFEND friendly ships, not ATTACK enemy ships which is why they are called cheesy :P  




Thanks for the clarification - and don't get me started on escort tactics.    




Will that be Lyran escorts, or the more popular Romulan escorts? Come to think of it, we'll all be thinking about tactics for these defensive only escorts.    

Marcus Smythe

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #54 on: March 12, 2003, 07:04:23 pm »
As for the Fed CVS+... how that ship fares is really going to depend on how we implement fighter distribution.  F-18's arent anything to write home about. F-14Ds are evil, wrong, and morally bad.

Ill be flying Fed.  

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #55 on: March 12, 2003, 09:40:40 pm »
Quote:

As for the Fed CVS+... how that ship fares is really going to depend on how we implement fighter distribution.  F-18's arent anything to write home about. F-14Ds are evil, wrong, and morally bad.

Ill be flying Fed.  




There were some, the CVB's, that carried F-15's and IIRC they(it, Nimitz I think) were on the Romulan border.

KBF-Dogmatix

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #56 on: March 12, 2003, 09:55:05 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)  





Some would say way too much whine...WAY too much.


 

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #57 on: March 13, 2003, 12:09:09 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)  





Some would say way too much whine...WAY too much.


 




Who asked you?  

JimCasca

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #58 on: March 16, 2003, 02:32:08 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)  




Come on Kroma, Like the Gorn BCH ain't tough enough!    



How many Gorn did you see in the BCHV, I flew it one time it's too slow any of the other tenders were better IMHO now IF you want to make a good heavy Gorn tender use the BF.  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #2: Easy Escorts Everywhere for Everyone
« Reply #59 on: March 16, 2003, 09:26:42 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Is it too late to make this a Vanilla server?   AOTK was the cheesiest server I have ever seen.  Let's not make future servers worse.  




Plenty of whine too. ;-)  




Come on Kroma, Like the Gorn BCH ain't tough enough!    



How many Gorn did you see in the BCHV, I flew it one time it's too slow any of the other tenders were better IMHO now IF you want to make a good heavy Gorn tender use the BF.  




Totally agree. The BCHV scare was totally blown out of proportion.