Topic: TNG Constitution Project (Read 47869 times)

Vipre · « **Reply #140 on:** November 14, 2007, 03:41:07 pm »

I think windows near the bridge would work as well. I'd like to suggest they be oval in shape rather than rectangular or square and wider than they are tall.

AsYlUm · « **Reply #141 on:** November 14, 2007, 04:14:08 pm »

little bit more guys and gals... going as ahrd and as fast as i can.. because im outta here 2morow.. patience is the game

Starforce2 · « **Reply #142 on:** November 14, 2007, 04:53:55 pm »

I dunno man those gold phasers looked kinda neat. Perhaps keep that texture as an option? Then everyone can be happy. The gold trim pruces it up a bit.

AsYlUm · « **Reply #143 on:** November 14, 2007, 05:22:08 pm »

ass view

Starforce2 · « **Reply #144 on:** November 14, 2007, 10:55:16 pm »

Quote from: asylum on November 14, 2007, 05:22:08 pm

ass view

It's got a nice ass.

Lieutenant_Q · « **Reply #145 on:** November 15, 2007, 01:29:14 am »

Phasers on the Nacelles itself? Doesn't that violate some engineering principles?

It also makes the Nacelles an even more tempting target than they already are. Just my opinion, but I think they should be removed from the Nacelles.

She's looking very purdy. Keep up the good work!

atheorhaven · « **Reply #146 on:** November 15, 2007, 09:31:11 am »

Quote from: Lieutenant_Q on November 15, 2007, 01:29:14 am

Phasers on the Nacelles itself? Doesn't that violate some engineering principles?

It also makes the Nacelles an even more tempting target than they already are. Just my opinion, but I think they should be removed from the Nacelles.

She's looking very purdy. Keep up the good work!

Found what I was looking for..

It's been done in canon before, if you accept DS9 as canon.

The Oddessy and Venture both had phaser arrays on the nacelles in the Dominion War. From Wikipedia:

"USS Venture NCC-71854 DS9: "The Way of the Warrior, Part II", "Sacrifice of Angels", "Tears of the Prophets" Responds to Klingon attack on Deep Space Nine and participates in the Dominion War. The model has the two extra phaser arrays on top of its nacelles like the Enterprise D in "All Good Things"."

Starforce2 · « **Reply #147 on:** November 15, 2007, 05:47:25 pm »

that was explained as the people in the prop dept reversing the agt model back to a standard galaxy not realising those were supposed to be removed. But, how many things that defy engeneering principles end up happening due to advancements.

Jay1886 · « **Reply #148 on:** November 18, 2007, 06:29:59 am »

I can imagine that Galaxy classes had a pretty nasty blindspot when approached from behind. They were after all large and a bit cumbersome. I think nacelles are a primary target anyway, adding phaserstrips would only make ships think twice before making a run for the nacelles.

Jay1886 · « **Reply #149 on:** November 18, 2007, 12:55:53 pm »

It's positions which mattered, the sovy had a dozen, yet it had a blindspot until it enjoyed additional strips.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #150 on:** November 18, 2007, 10:47:01 pm »

yea, pitty we never saw the galaxy use them very often. One instance with the tamarians (or was it the husnok) where the ancelle pylon strips fired foreward and another was when ensign Ro made her pretend escape from the E's shuttlebay and they fired a few intentionaly wide shots to make it look good.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #151 on:** November 21, 2007, 12:45:45 pm »

Now that's hot !!!!!

Starforce2 · « **Reply #152 on:** November 27, 2007, 07:20:16 pm »

bump for news.?

Cromwell · « **Reply #153 on:** November 28, 2007, 04:47:11 pm »

I gotta say I just kinda stumbled into this thread out of curiosity. Honestly a TNG remake has been done alot and its never done well so I wasn't expecting much but I must say that your ship design has blown me away. That's incredible and your modeling skills are superb. Thats an incredible job your doing, love the design.

BTW. I'm with lieutenant_Q, having phasers on the Nacelles doesn't feel right, the way you did it leaves excellent detail on the nacelles so I'd leave it one way or another. Excellent work!

Jay1886 · « **Reply #154 on:** December 03, 2007, 09:04:32 am »

I was going to wait another week before asking but.. Asylum? Will we see an update or are you experiencing delaying problems?

darkthunder · « **Reply #155 on:** December 11, 2007, 12:29:26 am »

Bump for news?

Cromwell · « **Reply #156 on:** December 11, 2007, 12:37:12 am »

I'm with you DarkThunder, I'm crossing my fingers this project hasn't died all of a sudden. I really want to see this one completed. Such a gorgeous design.

atheorhaven · « **Reply #157 on:** December 11, 2007, 09:44:17 am »

Quote from: asylum on November 14, 2007, 04:14:08 pm

little bit more guys and gals... going as ahrd and as fast as i can.. because im outta here 2morow.. patience is the game

Sooo.. he's on holidays.. when he gets back, I'm sure that he'll post more.

davies78 · « **Reply #158 on:** December 19, 2007, 02:58:48 pm »

He is awat with work for up to six months he was not sure of an internet connection quess he was out of luck im sure he is still working on the design

AsYlUm · « **Reply #159 on:** December 22, 2007, 09:08:49 pm »

Hungry are you.... lol

I have been to afghanistan for the past 5 weeks or so... but managed some progress, by the way the dude abaove is my brother so he is in the know lol... say hi to davies78 everybody

so some wips... gis a sec

as for phaser strips on the necelles... i understand the argument, but its done and past now lol... sorry

i was not here for the argument

News:

Topic: TNG Constitution Project (Read 47869 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Topic: TNG Constitution Project (Read 47869 times)