Topic: UFOP Leopard class heavy cruiser WIP.... (Read 6428 times)

Anthony Scott · « **Reply #20 on:** July 01, 2007, 09:11:52 pm »

Looks good, definately one of those Feds that breaks the whole saucer/neck/secondary hull thing.

Semper Fi, Carry On

Raven Night · « **Reply #21 on:** July 03, 2007, 03:56:52 pm »

Ok, i made a few slight changes, i can post more pics, but heres a front view....

I shortened the struts (way too long) and also widened the deflector hull a bit.

Raven Night · « **Reply #22 on:** July 04, 2007, 11:11:58 pm »

Any opinions on the shorter struts and wider deflector hull?

Starforce2 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 05, 2007, 06:20:15 am »

the nacelles just plain look dumb.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #24 on:** July 05, 2007, 06:23:06 am »

Quote from: Starforce2 on July 05, 2007, 06:20:15 am

the nacelles just plain look dumb.

Wow man, back that up a lil bit.

I like the shorter nacelles, makes it a little more compact / streamlined.
I can't believe this is a CA, though. It feels more like a Destroyer, maybe a Light Cruiser, but im nitpicking at this point.
Cool design.

Raven Night · « **Reply #25 on:** July 05, 2007, 07:54:33 am »

Quote from: Furyofaseraph on July 05, 2007, 06:23:06 am

Quote from: Starforce2 on July 05, 2007, 06:20:15 am
the nacelles just plain look dumb.

Wow man, back that up a lil bit.

I like the shorter nacelles, makes it a little more compact / streamlined.
I can't believe this is a CA, though. It feels more like a Destroyer, maybe a Light Cruiser, but im nitpicking at this point.
Cool design.

Well, shes around the size of the Intrepid, and this is the 3rd Fleet (Marine Corps) so the designations are a bit different. I am open to changing the designation as far as the size class of course, if you guys have a specific suggestion on what size she should be.

Raven Night · « **Reply #26 on:** July 05, 2007, 09:14:38 am »

Ok, how about a nacelle shaped like this instead.....remember, this is a very plain, very basic overall shape just for comparison.

Part of the problem here is that if I reshape the nacelles to be more blocky, I have to lengthen them at the rear....I think they are too short otherwise.

Raven Night · « **Reply #27 on:** July 06, 2007, 10:04:29 am »

Any opinions on the new nacelles?

Don Karnage · « **Reply #28 on:** July 10, 2007, 06:57:47 pm »

hmm the well i think there bether looking that the original.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #29 on:** July 10, 2007, 10:52:24 pm »

What about taking 2 nacelles and fusing them together at their bottoms so they are a single, fat nacelle, and making it look like the pylong goes through at the seam, as if the nacelle slid on the pylon with a slot much like some glueless plastic models.

Raven Night · « **Reply #30 on:** July 12, 2007, 02:46:26 pm »

I could try that....maybe the nacelle is too flat for you guys?

admiral horton · « **Reply #31 on:** July 12, 2007, 11:03:42 pm »

an inresting design i look forward to see how this comes out

GotAFarmYet? · « **Reply #32 on:** July 13, 2007, 12:53:42 am »

Try making the warp engine more part of the wing. Round it at the bussards and then sweep them backwards with the grills on the outside edge

Raven Night · « **Reply #33 on:** July 18, 2007, 03:01:40 pm »

Could you post a pic of what you mean? Your idea sounds interesting........

News: