Topic: Sirius-class Medium-range Exploration Cruiser WIP (Read 4584 times)

ModelsPlease · « **on:** July 10, 2007, 02:30:45 pm »

I found an obscure FASA discription of this Class so I thought I'd give it a go. This will be my last one for a while as R/L is in full effect again. Still needs texture work and regs but here's a sneak peak...........

OUTALANCE SHIPYARDS
U.S.S. Sirius NCC 1400
Sirius-class Medium-range Exploration Cruiser

The Sirius class was a four-nacelled design from the 2220s which remained in service until the 2280s when the newer Constellation-class replaced them.
Sirius class starships were used for medium-range exploration missions and border patrols.
When Starfleet began its refit program for the Constitution, Akula and Triton classes, it was decided that it was simpler to replace the Sirius class with a similar design of brand new vessels due to the complexities of the four nacelle design.
The Sirius-class provided data used on several later designs of four nacelle ships including the Constellation, Cheyenne and Prometheus classes.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 10, 2007, 02:44:35 pm »

lovely. Could the phaser mounts be made a bit more pronoucned?

Centurus · « **Reply #2 on:** July 10, 2007, 03:05:24 pm »

Not bad. She could use a more detailed impulse drive section, but not bad. One suggestion I would make. Swap the placement of the warp engines so that the aft thruster ports are facing in the other direction. Basically, taking the warp engines on the bottom and putting them on the top, and vice versa.

Adonis · « **Reply #3 on:** July 10, 2007, 03:21:06 pm »

Man, that's cute

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #4 on:** July 10, 2007, 03:32:05 pm »

That's pretty decent, MP. She's quite cute! I do agree with Centaurus about the nacelles, though.

Just one other thing: She's a TMP refitted ship, and you said:

Quote

When Starfleet began its refit program for the Constitution, Akula and Triton classes, it was decided that it was simpler to replace the Sirius class with a similar design of brand new vessels due to the complexities of the four nacelle design.

That being the case, shouldn't she have a TOS bridge and nacelles?

Vipre · « **Reply #5 on:** July 10, 2007, 03:48:29 pm »

Looks nice.

I'd like to see the 2220 version myself. Wonder if it'd be a Connie bash with Daedalus parts?

Dizzy · « **Reply #6 on:** July 10, 2007, 09:02:38 pm »

Quote from: Starforce2 on July 10, 2007, 02:44:35 pm

lovely. Could the phaser mounts be made a bit more pronoucned?

What phaser points?

Your choice of verbiage has done to the TOS, what Adoniss choice of pixel resolution does to OP IG performance.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #7 on:** July 10, 2007, 10:48:17 pm »

Quote from: Dizzy on July 10, 2007, 09:02:38 pm

Quote from: Starforce2 on July 10, 2007, 02:44:35 pm
lovely. Could the phaser mounts be made a bit more pronoucned?

What phaser points?
Your choice of verbiage has done to the TOS, what Adoniss choice of pixel resolution does to OP IG performance.

Um..rotfl..phaser titties damnit! She needs some titties!

Seriously, MP knows what I mean, but for anyone that doesn't, I'm refering to making them actualy stick out of the ship an be easily visable as they are on some shots of the Ent-a.
http://www.uah.edu/~jim/1701a1.jpg

To some others in this threads, I agree about the TOS, But I'd like to see the nacelles that had the spears on the front.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #8 on:** July 10, 2007, 10:54:26 pm »

Quote from: F9thCenturus on July 10, 2007, 03:05:24 pm

Swap the placement of the warp engines so that the aft thruster ports are facing in the other direction. Basically, taking the warp engines on the bottom and putting them on the top, and vice versa.

I like this idea, that I do.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #9 on:** July 10, 2007, 11:32:06 pm »

Quote from: F9thCenturus on July 10, 2007, 03:05:24 pm

Not bad. She could use a more detailed impulse drive section, but not bad. One suggestion I would make. Swap the placement of the warp engines so that the aft thruster ports are facing in the other direction. Basically, taking the warp engines on the bottom and putting them on the top, and vice versa.

Done! see first post

Quote

Could the phaser mounts be made a bit more pronoucned?

They will be there, I threw this together in less then an hour just to see if the design itself was ok for everyone and get feedback.

Quote

That being the case, shouldn't she have a TOS bridge and nacelles?

I'm not done yet

Quote

To some others in this threads, I agree about the TOS, But I'd like to see the nacelles that had the spears on the front.

If I have the time I will do a TOS version.

Great feedbacks thanks folks

Norsehound · « **Reply #10 on:** July 10, 2007, 11:33:01 pm »

Looks like an SFB NCA with an additional nacelle...

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #11 on:** July 10, 2007, 11:38:06 pm »

Quote from: Norsehound on July 10, 2007, 11:33:01 pm

Looks like an SFB NCA with an additional nacelle...

That's because it was

Dizzy · « **Reply #12 on:** July 11, 2007, 12:02:43 am »

er... there are no phaser points I can see...

Centurus · « **Reply #13 on:** July 11, 2007, 11:47:35 am »

Ahhh, much better. The engine placement and alignment make the ship look more practical and viable. :-D What other changes/addition you have planned for this ship?

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #14 on:** July 11, 2007, 02:47:20 pm »

Quote from: F9thCenturus on July 11, 2007, 11:47:35 am

Ahhh, much better. The engine placement and alignment make the ship look more practical and viable. :-D What other changes/addition you have planned for this ship?

New impulse drive, phaser turrets and hangerbay, maybe new pylons. And a TOS version using SF's warp request

I'll get some WIP's up shortly

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #15 on:** July 11, 2007, 04:41:04 pm »

LOL After alot of thought I trashed the original bash and created a whole new ship

. Still will need Regs. See first post for pics. Opinions please

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #16 on:** July 11, 2007, 04:51:52 pm »

Its a Mini-Constellation.
I like both versions, but here's what I would do: using the new parts align the nacelles horizontally, so that the ship is wider than it is tall.

Bernard Guignard · « **Reply #17 on:** July 11, 2007, 05:30:17 pm »

looking good

Don't throw away the other one also they are both really good use the other one as an earlier varient

Keep up the great work

Starforce2 · « **Reply #18 on:** July 11, 2007, 05:41:20 pm »

Quote from: Bernard Guignard on July 11, 2007, 05:30:17 pm

looking good Don't throw away the other one also they are both really good use the other one as an earlier varient

Keep up the great work

I agree, the pylons on the other ship looked way better than a constelation setup (not that the 2nd version isn't good too) but NEVER throw out a good ship...

Starforce2 · « **Reply #19 on:** July 11, 2007, 05:42:52 pm »

Quote from: Dizzy on July 11, 2007, 12:02:43 am

er... there are no phaser points I can see...

Well, the original had them, they were very faint, if you didn't notice them then that was my entire point of asking for better ones...Unless you were just too busy staring at those Orion girls of yours..

Starforce2 · « **Reply #20 on:** August 09, 2007, 10:13:33 am »

bump?

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #21 on:** August 09, 2007, 10:41:52 am »

Sorry I scapped it for now. Looks too much like another ship I'm working on so I'm going to re-address this design at a later date. However I will be releasing the "OTHER" design shortly and you'll see what I mean about looks

News:

Topic: Sirius-class Medium-range Exploration Cruiser WIP (Read 4584 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Topic: Sirius-class Medium-range Exploration Cruiser WIP (Read 4584 times)