Topic: Youngblood-class Heavy Carrier (CVL+) RELEASED !!!! (Read 7565 times)

ModelsPlease · « **on:** July 05, 2007, 08:48:28 pm »

OUTALANCE SHIPYARDS
U.S.S. YOUNGBLOOD NCC-2263
Youngblood-class Heavy Carrier (CVL+)

Designed in 1995 by Mark Wilson for the 'Galactic Engineers Concordance'
--------------------
Author: ModelsPlease
Mesh and Textures: p81
Retextures: GAFY? and ModelsPlease
Registry: Atheorhaven
Kitbashed by: ModelsPlease
HP/DP and Scale: ModelsPlease

http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/files/dist/index.php/file,eb853b5f811b4ab23b838a005ed36677.rar

HUGE Thanks Alec for doing the regs !!!!

JohanobesusII · « **Reply #1 on:** July 05, 2007, 09:49:46 pm »

I think it would work better if you put the nacelles back in their traditional position and make the neck narrower. It would look like less of a kitbash if it were more like a traditional Constitution modified to serve as a carrier. We need a good TMP Coronado to go with Khaliban's Enterprise (and Adonis' Excelsior, assuming it ever gets released).

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #2 on:** July 06, 2007, 04:25:24 am »

Quote from: JohanobesusII on July 05, 2007, 09:49:46 pm

I think it would work better if you put the nacelles back in their traditional position and make the neck narrower. It would look like less of a kitbash if it were more like a traditional Constitution modified to serve as a carrier. We need a good TMP Coronado to go with Khaliban's Enterprise (and Adonis' Excelsior, assuming it ever gets released).

GAFY?, Mackie,KF,myself and a few others have all done the traditional Connie carriers, just surf Battleclinic and you'll find them all, besides it was a request based on this schematic

.........

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #3 on:** July 06, 2007, 02:18:31 pm »

Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on July 06, 2007, 06:23:08 am

nice to see ya back bro

Not really back as of yet, still have a few things going on here but I had an hour to kill so I bashed this on up

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #4 on:** July 07, 2007, 04:28:54 am »

Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on July 07, 2007, 02:47:31 am

good enough for me

Hells you're easy. J/K

Starforce2 · « **Reply #5 on:** July 07, 2007, 06:53:19 am »

nice.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #6 on:** July 07, 2007, 07:35:40 pm »

Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on July 07, 2007, 07:31:08 am

Quote from: ModelsPlease on July 07, 2007, 04:28:54 am
Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on July 07, 2007, 02:47:31 am
good enough for me

Hells you're easy. J/K

Funny thats what i was told the other night:P

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #7 on:** July 08, 2007, 12:12:30 am »

Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on July 07, 2007, 07:31:08 am

Quote from: ModelsPlease on July 07, 2007, 04:28:54 am
Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on July 07, 2007, 02:47:31 am
good enough for me

Hells you're easy. J/K

Funny thats what i was told the other night:P

Oofah

Starforce2 · « **Reply #8 on:** July 08, 2007, 12:58:15 am »

Welcome aboard the USS Didnt-want-to-know.

Bernard Guignard · « **Reply #9 on:** July 08, 2007, 07:05:54 am »

The shame of it was that Mark never followed up with Bow and Aft views of his shuttle carriers as well as cross-sections.
He had a great opportunity there I would have enjoyed picking up the follow up material to the comparison chart.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #10 on:** July 08, 2007, 12:27:50 pm »

Quote from: Bernard Guignard on July 08, 2007, 07:05:54 am

The shame of it was that Mark never followed up with Bow and Aft views of his shuttle carriers as well as cross-sections.
He had a great opportunity there I would have enjoyed picking up the follow up material to the comparison chart.

Agreed, it's hard sometimes to figure out what's actually there in the missing views

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #11 on:** July 08, 2007, 06:58:27 pm »

That's what the text background supplied with the schematics are for.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #12 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:04:07 pm »

Maybe I'm just not getting it .......

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #13 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:26:05 pm »

By all means, you are not nuts, MP. I totally agree with you. I really don't know why Mark Wilson felt the need to create a new "trapeziod" nav deflector, but he says it's something to do with projecting or extending the deflector beam along the flightpath of the auxiliary craft., and the curve at the top is necessary and that's why the torp launcher had to be shifted to under the secondary hull.

I'll type in what the schematics actually say when I get home, just for completeness' sake. But I do think that a standard nav deflector, or even better, the one from the Belknap class, should have been used. Go figure.

That said, he obviously put in a lot of work to these schematics and I feel bound to honour that effort by matching it up. I'll be keeping my own Belknap deflector, but I think his plans do make more sense with no forward shuttlebay.

Look at it this way: If the entire length of the secondary hull is a hanger, where does the linear intermix shafts/warp core go? It couldbe done, like the turbolift shafts we see in the TMP Enterprise's hanger bay, but it would obstruct the flight deck.

atheorhaven · « **Reply #14 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:31:01 pm »

Saucer regs are done.. trying to attach them to the post..

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #15 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:31:17 pm »

Quote from: Scottish Andy on July 09, 2007, 01:26:05 pm

Look at it this way: If the entire length of the secondary hull is a hanger, where does the linear intermix shafts/warp core go?

In the neck since there's no torp room there

atheorhaven · « **Reply #16 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:39:11 pm »

Okay, texture #1

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #17 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:39:44 pm »

That would make for a pretty short-ranged ship... according to my resources, that's what the destroyer classes use. Could be done though, I suppose.

atheorhaven · « **Reply #18 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:40:46 pm »

Okay, texture #2

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #19 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:43:11 pm »

Hate to be a pest, Athorehaven, but could you also rework the registry for my ship too, please? I can't seem to get it right with PSP 7. I've got the same saucer section as MP's ship.

I'd like to request the USS Kuznetsov NCC-2266.

Thanks if you can, Oh well if you can't. Easy come, easy go.

atheorhaven · « **Reply #20 on:** July 09, 2007, 01:49:06 pm »

Quote from: Scottish Andy on July 09, 2007, 01:43:11 pm

Hate to be a pest, Athorehaven, but could you also rework the registry for my ship too, please? I can't seem to get it right with PSP 7. I've got the same saucer section as MP's ship.

I'd like to request the USS Kuznetsov NCC-2266.

Thanks if you can, Oh well if you can't. Easy come, easy go.

Yup.. can do.. will also attach them to here..

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #21 on:** July 09, 2007, 02:18:32 pm »

Thanks, Atheor, I really appreciate it!

& +1 for you.

atheorhaven · « **Reply #22 on:** July 09, 2007, 02:19:26 pm »

Quote from: Scottish Andy on July 09, 2007, 01:43:11 pm

Hate to be a pest, Athorehaven, but could you also rework the registry for my ship too, please? I can't seem to get it right with PSP 7. I've got the same saucer section as MP's ship.

I'd like to request the USS Kuznetsov NCC-2266.

Thanks if you can, Oh well if you can't. Easy come, easy go.

#1

Sorry about that, will correct momentarily..

atheorhaven · « **Reply #23 on:** July 09, 2007, 02:20:33 pm »

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #24 on:** July 09, 2007, 03:12:40 pm »

I grabbed #2 okay, but #1 seems to be missing the DL link.

Can't wait to try them on when I get home!

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #25 on:** July 09, 2007, 03:40:16 pm »

I completely redid my bash to as accurately as I could get to the schematic (no front hanger)

SHE'S UPLOADED GO get it

Links in first post

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #26 on:** July 09, 2007, 03:42:25 pm »

Oh hey, worry not Atheor. I'm just well pleased you could do them for me at all. Again, many thanks!

MP, she's looking good! I'd have liked to try putting the shuttlebays in a texures, but kinda warped the hull to make the general to much for them to get put on straight. Still can't use LithUnwrap... *sigh*

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #27 on:** July 09, 2007, 11:08:22 pm »

Quote from: Scottish Andy on July 09, 2007, 03:42:25 pm

Oh hey, worry not Atheor. I'm just well pleased you could do them for me at all. Again, many thanks!

MP, she's looking good! I'd have liked to try putting the shuttlebays in a texures, but kinda warped the hull to make the general to much for them to get put on straight. Still can't use LithUnwrap... *sigh*

Then just make a new secondary hull. Practice is a great learning tool.

News:

Topic: Youngblood-class Heavy Carrier (CVL+) RELEASED !!!! (Read 7565 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Topic: Youngblood-class Heavy Carrier (CVL+) RELEASED !!!! (Read 7565 times)