Topic: Hull integrity stuff  (Read 3148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roychipoqua_Mace

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 786
  • Gender: Male
Hull integrity stuff
« on: May 08, 2007, 04:31:47 pm »
Hey,
I was wondering how tough all of the ships are, so I tried testing it: Flying a heavy cruiser from each race with a BPV of ~150-160, at green alert, against a K-C7 (game speed 11 to speed things up). Here are the results, in order from toughest to weakest. The number is the amount of damage it took for my ship to be destroyed.

G-CC+    =231  (So Gorn really are the toughest)
Z-CCH    =230  (Didn't know Mirak were so high up there)
I-CAP     =227
L-CC+    =222
F-CAD+  =220
H-CHA   =220   (I though Hydrans were supposed to be the hardiest race?)
K-D7W   =217
R-FHA    =212   (Still my favorite race though)
« Last Edit: May 08, 2007, 04:42:13 pm by RIS Mace »

Offline Rod ONeal

  • D.Net Beta Tester
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3592
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2007, 11:49:26 pm »
What you've "basically" done here is count internals. Kzinti are tough in your study because of all the phaser 3s add to its total internals. There are other things that make a ship tough in combat. Some worthless systems shield the valuable ones on the damage table. If you could do the same test, but count the number of internals before you loose 1/2 your weapons you'd get a slightly different result.
If Romulans aren't cowards, then why do they taste like chicken?

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2007, 01:32:59 pm »
that sounds about right, it normal takes 250 internals to crack a cruiser in half with D2 loadouts.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2007, 02:14:32 pm »
Some will take less internals to kill if massively alpha striked. All the excess damage may get tagged b4 other systems take damage. Mizia fire may take the longest to kill a target. You can bet all systems will go b4 the excess damage is all hit. Time will increase a ship's internal count. Ask Chuut and his war destroyer... 10 Spares will increase a ships internal count by 30 if used on engines and 20 or more if used on systems, especially those with multiple weapons in one hardpoint.

And then there is a bit of voodoo magic... like when you lag when you're hit and the packet is lost, hahahahaha.

Offline Roychipoqua_Mace

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 786
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2007, 03:36:31 pm »
So the real test is how many hits on the hull boxes to see how resilient a ship is. One thing I'm confused about: What is the difference between forward hull, center hull, aft hull, etc. Is a ship with mostly center hull tougher?

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2007, 03:48:38 pm »
Look up the SFB DAC. All your answers are there

Offline GE-Raven

  • Lord God Emperor for Life of the Taldren SETI Group
  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2621
  • Gender: Male
  • The cause of AND solution to life's problems
    • Raven's Nest
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2007, 03:50:55 pm »
So the real test is how many hits on the hull boxes to see how resilient a ship is. One thing I'm confused about: What is the difference between forward hull, center hull, aft hull, etc. Is a ship with mostly center hull tougher?

in a nutshell (from memory).

If you are hit in the rear you lose rear hull and when that is gone you start cutting into center hull.  This is true for all directions.  So IF you could evenly space out your damage  the total number of hull combined would be optimal.  However in practice you tend to get all your damage from one of the four ways.... so in practice center hull (plus the hull of the direction you tend to take damage from) is the most important for longevity.

GE-Raven

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2007, 09:07:32 am »
So the real test is how many hits on the hull boxes to see how resilient a ship is. One thing I'm confused about: What is the difference between forward hull, center hull, aft hull, etc. Is a ship with mostly center hull tougher?

"Hull" are the non-weapons and non-power areas of the ship.  Crew quarters, dining halls, Bowling alleys, etc.   Loosing all your hull simply means the non-essential systems have been hit.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Roychipoqua_Mace

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 786
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #8 on: May 11, 2007, 04:44:53 pm »
Okay guys I think my original test is a dud. Tried it again on the G-CC+ and got 212 instead of 231. If there's that much variance, it doesn't really say much  :-\

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13063
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2007, 08:44:37 pm »
Okay guys I think my original test is a dud. Tried it again on the G-CC+ and got 212 instead of 231. If there's that much variance, it doesn't really say much  :-\

Critically damage a ship so it has no weapons and then sit there watching.  Its hull integrity comes back.  This is partially accounted for by regenerating engines but I believe that some other systems also regenerate though I've never seen it documented.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline Panzergranate

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2905
  • Gender: Male
  • Aw!! Da big nasty Klingon L7 killed da kitty kat!!
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2007, 09:37:00 pm »
The order is which you make repairs is important too. Check out the repair power cost tables in SFB Volume.III. for details. The orderin which the AI decides to make repairs is unknown but probally logical in some sort of way.

If my oponent hasn't drone capability then I don't watse spares ion tractor hits or bother with shuttle/fighter if they're all ou in space.

Certain wepons system cost as much as 10 points of power to fix. Running at high speed and wondering why a repair is dragging so long  is probally because there isn't enough power available. You might have to drop speed slightly to fix it. Not always poosible if being pursued by a hostile posse!!

In SFB you could just choose not to charge or power up some weapons mounts, not so in SFC so far.

It's this complexity that makes SFC so much better than Legacy or Bridge Commander when comes to tactical and cunning play. SFC is the Chess to BC and L's Checkers.

The Klingons have many ways to fry a cat. I prefer to use an L7 Fast Battlecruiser!!

Offline Lieutenant_Q

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1669
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2007, 10:49:59 pm »
You can chose not to power up weapons, just click the Hard Point and then click the "Offline" button.  Useful for Phasers that point the wrong way, Photons that are sucking way too much power, Plasmas that never charge...etc..
"Your mighty GDI forces have been emasculated, and you yourself are a killer of children.  Now of course it's not true.  But the world only believes what the media tells them to believe.  And I tell the media what to believe, its really quite simple." - Kane (Joe Kucan) Command & Conquer Tiberium Dawn (1995)

Offline Panzergranate

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2905
  • Gender: Male
  • Aw!! Da big nasty Klingon L7 killed da kitty kat!!
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2007, 12:20:43 am »
Don't they stay charged but not under the fire button??

I do this sometimes, switch to monitor something and they come on again when I return. I only use this option to save drone ammo. My son is a compulsive button and control fidler in games, which always his downfall against human players. He's usually so busy setting and resetting ECM/ECCM, photons, power, etc. he's not playing attention to what the other players are doing and finds himself introuble alot or missing good tactical o;urunities.

Aparently a Plasma Torpedo launcher is the most power hungry thing to fix. I  notuced this with F-BCF, anything Romulan or Gorn.

I generally test out ships by reclassifying them  in shiplist.txt or SFCSPB13.txt as F-XXX, K-XXX, G-XXX, etc., settung up a serial game, loading up players A and B as thse ships and starting the game. Pressing T allows me to follow the actions of either computer controlled ship.

Any non-stock introduced designation ship will cause this interesting bug to occur. At least on ship must be a stock designation (F-FF, etc.) when using non-stock designated shipin a squadron, if you want to join in.

Gorn ships usually win in best if 3 computer vs computer games like this.
The Klingons have many ways to fry a cat. I prefer to use an L7 Fast Battlecruiser!!

Offline Lieutenant_Q

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1669
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2007, 09:34:57 am »
That depends, one of the "Tactical Tips" given in the Manual is the so-called 5th Weapon group, which is quite silly actually.  If you press the 'R' key as they suggest you will reactivate every weapons HP.  Also if you only take 2 Photons offline (on a 4 Photon Ship) if they are in the same weapon as the two active, and you switch between Proxie  and Normal, you will reactivate because switching will switch all 4 HPs.  You can leave weapons offline, and they won't suck any power, you just have to make sure that you don't do something that could accidentally reactivate them.
"Your mighty GDI forces have been emasculated, and you yourself are a killer of children.  Now of course it's not true.  But the world only believes what the media tells them to believe.  And I tell the media what to believe, its really quite simple." - Kane (Joe Kucan) Command & Conquer Tiberium Dawn (1995)

Offline Panzergranate

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2905
  • Gender: Male
  • Aw!! Da big nasty Klingon L7 killed da kitty kat!!
Re: Hull integrity stuff
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2007, 06:39:51 pm »
I generally use the same tactics I used in SFB games and they work out quite well.

I usually back off, slow down to 1/3rd impulse,  (2/3rd impulse with the F6 or just stay flat out with a D15, L6 or L7) charge weapons and pick an oportunity to hit a target ship.

My son still hasn't learnt that his tactic of charging only shields facing an enemy only works ion the computer. I fly over him and fire at the oposite side.

Always the same settings: ECCM full up (If I fire anything I want it to have a good chance to hit!!), Shields to reinforce all, speed 19 to close, speed 11 or 9 in to finish the kill.

Tactics with an L6 or L7 are different due to the larger turning circle (E), movement costs (1.33) and 60 warp engine power available.

The main tactic is to move away from enemy, charge all weapons (torpedoes, drones, phasers, etc.), turn and approach the target. At a key moment drop a mine "early" so that the enemy breaks left/right to avoid. blast out enemy's forward shields, weapons, toilets, etc. with the 8 Disrupters, Topedoes, phasers.

Continue to head away from the target ship (and escorts), wait until the sucker turns to pursue and then fire drop a cluster pack or drones into the unshileded front of the target ship.

Turn and dispatch target ship, find new victim.

Because we run LAN games we can use full squadrons without the hastles of online games. I usually run an L7 with a  pair of D15 "Javelin" fast strike destroyers or F6 battle frigates, always on follow me. If they have to go deal with something then one escorts the other. D15s are fast, powerful but are spartan, poorly armed and poorly shielded.

The general rule with escorts is to let them never stray too far away and keep a close eye on them as they will come a cropper if you don't. Tactics to divide a squadron up and pick it off are key to multiplayer LAN games. If you realise that a player is deliberately luring away an escort(s), especially in team games, hit "follow me" immediately.

I'm giving away any of my escort luring tactics here but they can be developed in multiplayer games against the computer and refined on human players.

Luring away escorts was a popular tactic to play on inexperienced rookie players back in SFB days. In a campaign game another player and myself, flying a pair of F5Bs managed to lure 3 Fed DD+ right across the table until they realised that the dreadnaught they were supposed to be escorting was under attack by a C7 and D6D. By then they were too far away to help and when the turned around, we were there to harras sthem.

Team tactics win games!!

Individualism and glory hunting looses them!!


[ /b]
The Klingons have many ways to fry a cat. I prefer to use an L7 Fast Battlecruiser!!