Topic: AOTK3 map: Terrain has been added! (Read 2285 times)

FPF-DieHard · « **on:** May 27, 2007, 12:56:12 pm »

Take a look folks, this should be final unless I did something stupid like put a planet in a nebula.

The center is supposed to be a mess of rocks and nebs. I threw in 4 non-VC planets for resuply purposes about symetricaly.

PS. Artiflex sucks!!!!!

PPS. The Cetner planets are no longer homeworlds.

Dfly · « **Reply #1 on:** May 27, 2007, 01:52:59 pm »

Only problems I have seen so far are:

27-7 Rom planet in a neb

32-28 Lyran planet in a neb(really not good lol)

8-32 8-33 2 planets side by side, Fed/Mirak respectively

FPF-DieHard · « **Reply #2 on:** May 27, 2007, 01:57:02 pm »

Quote from: Dfly on May 27, 2007, 01:52:59 pm

Only problems I have seen so far are:

27-7 Rom planet in a neb

32-28 Lyran planet in a neb(really not good lol)

Thank you

Quote from: Dfly on May 27, 2007, 01:52:59 pm

8-32 8-33 2 planets side by side, Fed/Mirak respectively

This is not an issue.

Dizzy · « **Reply #3 on:** May 27, 2007, 06:42:03 pm »

I hope there are a few empty space hexes in the middle. All rock and neb would be too much!

deadmansix · « **Reply #4 on:** May 28, 2007, 05:34:09 pm »

Noticed that there were no Ambassadorial bases placed in ailed territory's oh mighty Blue One

FPF-DieHard · « **Reply #5 on:** May 29, 2007, 12:22:00 pm »

Quote from: deadmansix on May 28, 2007, 05:34:09 pm

Noticed that there were no Ambassadorial bases placed in ailed territory's oh mighty Blue One

You noticed that didn't you

KBFLordKrueg · « **Reply #6 on:** May 29, 2007, 12:26:51 pm »

While that is unfortunate I hope the "No Rotting Fur" rule will be added or in effect, since I see no specific reference to it in the current rules as posted.

FPF-DieHard · « **Reply #7 on:** May 29, 2007, 12:47:58 pm »

Quote from: KBFLordKrueg on May 29, 2007, 12:26:51 pm

While that is unfortunate I hope the "No Rotting Fur" rule will be added or in effect, since I see no specific reference to it in the current rules as posted.

Do you guys want one "Embasy" base per side? I don't think it's needed with this setup as most of hte actio will be in the center anyway.

'Rotting fur" should be illegal, but I see nothing wrong with a Race ceding a hex to an allie. This can be done with a DB edit.

KBFLordKrueg · « **Reply #8 on:** May 29, 2007, 12:51:11 pm »

Quote from: FPF-DieHard on May 29, 2007, 12:47:58 pm

Quote from: KBFLordKrueg on May 29, 2007, 12:26:51 pm
While that is unfortunate I hope the "No Rotting Fur" rule will be added or in effect, since I see no specific reference to it in the current rules as posted.

Do you guys want one "Embasy" base per side? I don't think it's needed with this setup as most of hte actio will be in the center anyway.

'Rotting fur" should be illegal, but I see nothing wrong with a Race ceding a hex to an allie. This can be done with a DB edit.

I agree and it doesn't matter to me IMPO.
We can let the populace decide IMPO.

KAT Chuut-Ritt · « **Reply #9 on:** May 29, 2007, 04:17:14 pm »

Might be fun to have no embassy hexes for a change.

I see no problem with ceding bases, but I have to think most races wouldn't cede their planets under any circumstance, but an origionally neutral or enemy planet would be another matter entirely.

FPF-DieHard · « **Reply #10 on:** May 29, 2007, 04:23:33 pm »

Quote from: KAT Chuut-Ritt on May 29, 2007, 04:17:14 pm

I have to think most races wouldn't cede their planets under any circumstance, but an origionally neutral or enemy planet would be another matter entirely.

The should be up to the discretion of the Supreme commanders. I do agree with you that I do not think it is likely.

Farfarer · « **Reply #11 on:** May 29, 2007, 04:32:26 pm »

How about Enemy Ambassador Planets or Starbases near the Homeworlds?

The possiibilities are endless....

News: