Poll

Do we want to use this rule or not?

Yes
12 (48%)
No
6 (24%)
Bump it to DN level.
7 (28%)

Total Members Voted: 25

Voting closed: April 07, 2007, 03:50:56 pm

Topic: SG7 Rule Vote  (Read 7495 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Lepton

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1620
Re: SG7 Rule Vote
« Reply #40 on: April 06, 2007, 10:04:04 pm »
Good posting Lepton and Chutt. Now u2 get together and write up a rule. I'll check it out and put it up to a vote, but DH and I are liking where you guys are coming from.
If you are willing to entertain the idea of exempting line ships from disengagement rule, then I'd be willing to go with Chuut's language and idea.  Any line ship is not subject to the disengagement rule no matter the circumstance.  Period.  Stop.  End of sentence.  All other ships subject to disengagement rule.  For any potential last minute change like this, it would be best to keep it simple.  However, I can see that this might seem to go too far, but if put up to a vote, then at least people will have a chance to register their feelings on it and discuss.


System Specs:

Dell Dimension E521
AMD64x2 5000+
2G DDR2 RAM
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB GDDR3
250GB SATA HD

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: SG7 Rule Vote
« Reply #41 on: April 06, 2007, 10:21:44 pm »
Now if you really want to see serious line ship usage, then allow players forced off a hexto return to that area in lineships.

Rationale, disengagement rulw would be due to the empire not wanting to lose rare fleet assets, line ships aren't rare so they are thrown at the enemy instead to fight a war of attrition.

Perfect.

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: SG7 Rule Vote
« Reply #42 on: April 06, 2007, 10:36:56 pm »
This thread is as good as closed. Go here to discuss it further plz.

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163374037.0.html

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: SG7 Rule Vote
« Reply #43 on: April 07, 2007, 12:38:31 am »
This thread is as good as closed. Go here to discuss it further plz.

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163374037.0.html


You say perfect to the ideas Lepton and I seem to accept, but instead of posting them in your new poll for discussion as Lepton wisely advised, you post something entirely different?  WTF?

he is my poll.

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163374040.0.html

Now why dont you delete the one you put up, and place the one we had seemed to come to a preliminary agreement about?