Topic: Taldren: Why no capture?  (Read 8524 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #20 on: March 14, 2003, 09:31:55 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

I never saw or had this bug Cleaven,And do not ever recall seeing it in testing so pfffffft.
I could be wrong,I am getting old and forgetful    




The point is that you are not the repository of the list of EAW bugs, and declaring that just because you never saw it then somebody else is speaking crap is just a sorry indictment on your attitude. You are a cad and a bounder and a chap should be able to demand satisfaction but you would assuredly not be game enough to provide it.

While you are using the dictionary, look up "ass" (the english spelling - not the american) since it also applies to you, until you see fit to renounce your initial statement.

   




Ok so I was incorredt,I am truly sorry.
Cleaven I would bother to insult you,But it seems God has beat me to it.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Rob Cole »

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #21 on: March 14, 2003, 09:45:42 pm »
Quote:


Ok so I was incorredt,I am truly sorry.
Cleaven I would bother to insult you,But it seems God has beat me to it.

PS: DH was right you are an ass(The American version)  




So in admitting your freedom with the truth you seek to extend the insult. Even so you acknowledge the lie you made, so I don't think you are an ass any longer because you did not make the claim through stupidity. You are still behaving as a cad though and will be treated as such in open fora, unless you seek to offer sincere satisfaction, which I assume you do not.    

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #22 on: March 14, 2003, 10:08:33 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


Ok so I was incorredt,I am truly sorry.
Cleaven I would bother to insult you,But it seems God has beat me to it.

PS: DH was right you are an ass(The American version)  




So in admitting your freedom with the truth you seek to extend the insult. Even so you acknowledge the lie you made, so I don't think you are an ass any longer because you did not make the claim through stupidity. You are still behaving as a cad though and will be treated as such in open fora, unless you seek to offer sincere satisfaction, which I assume you do not.    




Cleaven I assume that Die Hard was correct about you.Keep posting and you will prove it.

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #23 on: March 14, 2003, 10:18:26 pm »
Quote:


Cleaven I assume that Die Hard was correct about you.Keep posting and you will prove it.  




If Die Hard is the only support you have in justifying your insult to clintk and then myself then I hold you and your position in complete contempt. You don't want to stand by what you post, then don't post it. You want to use vulgarities in common speech with no regard for the truth then you have made your position clear for all to read. So be it.    
« Last Edit: March 14, 2003, 10:19:24 pm by Cleaven »

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #24 on: March 14, 2003, 10:23:24 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


Cleaven I assume that Die Hard was correct about you.Keep posting and you will prove it.  




If Die Hard is the only support you have in justifying your insult to clintk and then myself then I hold you and your position in complete contempt. You don't want to stand by what you post, then don't post it. You want to use vulgarities in common speech with no regard for the truth then you have made your position clear for all to read. So be it.      




Well Sir I had no problem with you UNTIL you spat out the first insults.
Perhaps you should try living by your own words.

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #25 on: March 14, 2003, 10:31:34 pm »
Quote:



Well Sir I had no problem with you UNTIL you spat out the first insults.
Perhaps you should try living by your own words.  




Your false and uncouth words marked you as a cad and a bounder. This is not in issue. Hence I have made a statement of fact and not an insult.

You have admitted the lie and then turned the insult to me so the description still fits.

I thought you made the asinine post through stupidty but that was not the case, by your own admission, so I withdraw the description of you as being an ass.


 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Cleaven »

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #26 on: March 14, 2003, 10:38:41 pm »
Quote:

Quote:



Well Sir I had no problem with you UNTIL you spat out the first insults.
Perhaps you should try living by your own words.  




Your false and uncouth words marked you as a cad and a bounder. This is not in issue. Hence I have made a staement of fact and not an insult.

You have admitted the lie and then turned the insult to me so the description still fits.

I thought you made the asinine post through stupidty but that was not the case, by your own admission, so I withdraw the description of you as being an ass.


   




Aye others say they has this problem,So I was wrong and said so.

And I think you are incorrect,You started with the insults directed at me.
I did not do a thing but return them in kind.

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #27 on: March 14, 2003, 10:52:41 pm »
Quote:



Aye others say they has this problem,So I was wrong and said so.

And I think you are incorrect,You started with the insults directed at me.
I did not do a thing but return them in kind.  




At no point have you offered satisfaction to clintk. Only after my criticism of your post and your attitude have you admitted your lie, and then only to insult me, reinforcing my view. My assessment of you will stand as long as you persist in this view and hold onto any idea that your behavior in making your first response is proper and acceptable.  

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #28 on: March 14, 2003, 10:56:31 pm »
Quote:

Quote:



Aye others say they has this problem,So I was wrong and said so.

And I think you are incorrect,You started with the insults directed at me.
I did not do a thing but return them in kind.  




At no point have you offered satisfaction to clintk. Only after my criticism of your post and your attitude have you admitted your lie, and then only to insult me, reinforcing my view. My assessment of you will stand as long as you persist in this view and hold onto any idea that your behavior in making your first response is proper and acceptable.  




Cleaven you did insult me first,Look at your first post in this thread.
clint can speak for himself he does not need a nanny.

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #29 on: March 14, 2003, 11:01:37 pm »
clintK,

I was wrong in my first post and am an ass(ask Cleaven) I am truly sorry.

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #30 on: March 14, 2003, 11:08:37 pm »
Quote:



Cleaven you did insult me first,Look at your first post in this thread.
clint can speak for himself he does not need a nanny.  




Yes, you are correct. I did say that "You are full of it."

I withdraw the that statement and apologise. You are not full of it. You just lied.

And then you made this quip.
"I never saw or had this bug Cleaven,And do not ever recall seeing it in testing so pfffffft.
I could be wrong,I am getting old and forgetful"

The rest stands.  



 

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #31 on: March 14, 2003, 11:11:38 pm »
Quote:

clintK,

I was wrong in my first post and am an ass(ask Cleaven) I am truly sorry.  




I no longer question you or your behaviour, and will not mention this again.  

Captain KoraH

  • Guest
Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2003, 05:25:52 pm »
I've just concluded that "disable capture" must be hard coded in the game. If I'm wrong please show me how to enable it for my Dynaverse server and single player games. If I'm right, I beg an explanation, what led to the disabling of this feature?

 

Locust

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2003, 06:47:53 pm »
It turns the Borg into a bunch of bumbling idiots if they can't assimilate...  I want to assimilate, even if it's only the AIs.

korus

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2003, 08:34:15 pm »
 Bump! I'd like to know that too... Taldren folks?

Korus  
 

Arcilte

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2003, 09:14:53 pm »
Sounds like a reasonable request. BUMP  

korus

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2003, 09:25:26 am »
  Bumping to keep the thread alive one more time....   It would add a new dimension if we could capture on the D3 wouldn't it? Talllllldren.... Hellloooo?

Korus
 

Blitzkrieg

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #37 on: March 11, 2003, 09:28:34 am »
Because it would make attacking the Borg far too easy I guess and especialy all other AI. When I played single player campaign I could capture and quite often this would make games too easy. Just imagine 3 ships beaming a full compliment of troops onto a ship at once, they would almost certainly have to retreat emediatly.

Mog

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #38 on: March 11, 2003, 10:25:21 am »
Capture in PvP is fun, especially when it's completely unexpected. For it not to be in D3 , especially with the Borg being there, strikes me as very odd indeed. Still got capture in D2 though

clintk

  • Guest
Re: Taldren: Why no capture?
« Reply #39 on: March 12, 2003, 08:13:43 pm »
Capturing human player ships in D2 caused a CTD (crash to desktop). The bug probably hasn't been fixed in D3 so it was easier to disable the option. In D2, I got around this bug by ending the mission even if the human player had other ships to escape to (obviously transferring to another ship is not available in SFC3).

I'll have a play later this year to try and find a way around the problem. Look out for my 'Mission Fun Pack', it'll be free to download and will be available for both SFC2:EAW and SFC3.  All missions will be playable in both single-player campaigns and metaverse campaigns (online). Some surprises will be in store, these include random team starting positions, random asteroid fields (except in multiplayer), random 'visual candy' such as planets etc, AI interventions, mission balancing, cowardly AI captains and a few surprises !
« Last Edit: March 12, 2003, 08:19:24 pm by clintk »