Topic: The Czar’s Gun  (Read 1584 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brush Wolf

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1685
  • Gender: Male
The Czar’s Gun
« on: March 17, 2007, 02:36:03 pm »
Spotted this in the local paper and thought the gun people here would find it interesting.

Duluthian buys ‘Czar’s Gun’
Brandon Stahl Duluth News Tribune
Published Friday, March 16, 2007
To firearm collectors, it’s known as the Holy Grail of guns, an almost mythical weapon. It was manufactured in 1914 and was meant for Czar Nicholas II of Russia. But the “Czar’s Gun” was long thought to be lost or destroyed, while some believed it never existed in the first place.

It did exist and now is owned by Duluth gun trader Jack Puglisi Sr., who bought it at an auction for $250,000 on Tuesday, thought to be a world record for a shotgun at auction.

“I’ve been doing this for nearly 40 years,” said Puglisi, who paid a 15 percent auction fee, bringing the price to $287,500. “This is one of the most exciting things I’ve ever experienced, to buy something that I never thought I’d own.”

Puglisi, 65, began buying and trading guns in 1961 when he was at Denfeld High School and went into the business full time in 1970. He owns Puglisi Gun Emporium on 1336 Commonwealth Ave. in Gary-New Duluth and is considered one of the most well-known gun traders and historians in the country. He said his business has blossomed over the past 10 years and is visited by traders from all over the globe.

“Over the years, we’ve developed the reputation that if you want to find something really good as an investment gun, we’re a place to visit,” Puglisi said.

Puglisi knew all about the lore of the Czar’s Gun, also known as the Czar’s Parker, because it was handmade by Parker Bros., one of the top firearm manufacturers at the time. It was to be shipped to Czar Nicholas II, but David Trevallion, a firearms manufacturer and historian, said World War I broke out and the gun sat in a New York dock.

It was shipped back to Parker Bros. and resold to a New York man, who owned it and later gave it to his son. From there it remained in obscurity for more than 90 years.

Trevallion said the gun, the first gun thought to be built for European royalty, grew into legend because it disappeared so quickly. A few fakes even surfaced, Trevallion said, including one that sold for thousands of dollars.

“It’s mythical,” Trevallion said. “It became: Where’s the Czar’s gun?”

Eventually, an auction company located the gun in New York. Trevallion said he certified it using original documentation from Parker Bros.

Puglisi knew if he wanted the gun he’d have to take an unusual strategy.

“I knew there were people prepared to pay as much or more than I was,” he said. “My competition was stout.”

He wanted to avoid the stair-stepping that can happen at an auction — people bidding in small increments and building to higher and higher amounts, sometimes over what an item is valued.

So Puglisi told the person bidding for him (he was in another state at the time) to do something dramatic. When the gun’s description was about to be read, Puglisi wanted the bidder to scream, “a quarter of a million dollars!”

“I wanted to shock the room into silence,” he said.

It worked.

“It was expected to start at $100,000 and just creep up,” said James Julia, who owns Julia’s Auctions, which sold the gun. “All of a sudden some fool just bid a quarter of a million dollars. It was great.”

Julia asked for $275,000, then $265,000, then $255,000. Though Julia estimated there were at least six others who were after the gun, no one else bid.

“They just didn’t regroup in time,” Julia said.

“A guy called me up 10 minutes later,” Puglisi said, “and said ‘before I knew it the gun was sold. I would have paid more. I’ll pay more for it right now.’ ”

But Puglisi plans to hold on to the gun. When he gets back from a gun show in Florida, he said he’ll go out and fire it and keep it in his collection at his store. But eventually, he said, he will sell it.

“If somebody wanted to buy it today, it would take a half a million dollars to pry it out of my hands,” he said. “But I’m very interested in owning it for a while. It’s perhaps the best investment I’ve ever made … if it were a piece of artwork, it would be a Renoir.”

BRANDON STAHL covers health. He can be reached at (218) 720-4154 or by e-mail at bstahl@duluthnews.com.
I am alright, it is the world that is wrong.

Offline Electric Eye

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 484
Re: The Czar’s Gun
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2007, 04:04:47 pm »
I read a history of the Czar and his family. Did ya'll know we supported the "Whites" vs the "Reds" during the revolution? It would seem we should have thrown in a lot more support.

Even to their dying day the Czar and family thought they would be "traded" off to a western country. In very few instances has an entire family (Much less a nation's leader) been outright killed. Ermmmm, wait a minute, history has shown that instance in this decade as well.

Much debate remains over any survivors from Ekatrinburg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekaterinburg

Offline Electric Eye

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 484
Re: The Czar’s Gun
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2007, 04:06:46 pm »
I would LOVE to have one of the Russian royal family's Faberge eggs.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/02/04/faberge.egg/

Offline S'Raek

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3665
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Czar’s Gun
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2007, 09:13:07 pm »
No pictures!   :'(

Veritas vos Liberabit -- Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus, et Fidelis

Offline Lieutenant_Q

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1669
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Czar’s Gun
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2007, 11:07:36 pm »
Yes, we should have supported the Whites more.  But three things ultimately doomed the Whites. 

First they weren't well organized.  Only the Siberian Forces and the so called Armed Forces of Southern Russia were organized larger than a couple of Battalions and partisans.

Second, the Whites just couldn't offer anything other than a "return to the status quo", which for many Russians was simply unacceptable.  Some changes had to be made, but the Whites just weren't willing to do that.

Third, remember the time period.  Immediately following the First World War.  The United States grew dissillusioned with world politics, they felt the Treaty of Versailles was a betrayal of their principles.  The Germans were broken and nuetered.  The Austro-Hungarians were splintering.   The French were more concerned with getting their reparations out of Germany, and Britain never had much of an Army anyways.  Influenza had just decimated the population of Western Europe.  There was considerable support for the Whites, but it had strings attached to it.  When the Whites failed to meet objectives set by Allied Planners, they pulled the support and left the Whites to wither.
"Your mighty GDI forces have been emasculated, and you yourself are a killer of children.  Now of course it's not true.  But the world only believes what the media tells them to believe.  And I tell the media what to believe, its really quite simple." - Kane (Joe Kucan) Command & Conquer Tiberium Dawn (1995)