Different prediction:
Democrat wins the White House and resumes her husband's prosecution of Microsoft. Company is broken up and there are 2 Windows variants.
I still (since early in the DOJ vs Microsoft case) would prefer to see the U.S. government and all its agencies merely require that all software they use allow them to default to saving in an open public file format - no variances from the standard allowed. The same for computer connectivity open standards for all protocols.
That would allow you to use Microsoft software if you wish, others could use the software they wish whether commercial or free wouldn't matter. Right now with the Microsoft DOC format being the dominant standard and Microsoft being able to vary it at will (my Wordpad doesn't open new doc files for example) it is very difficult to use any other office software when dealling with the government or large businesses.
Of course a close look would still be needed at some of Microsofts exclusionary business practices. As an example why is it that Dells Linux and no OS computers have always seemed more expensive than their Windows computers?
Is Microsoft using their market dominance to prevent Dell from marketting those machines at a lower price or is it just Dells choice?
I'd also like to see the EULA being used to remove peoples legal rights removed. To me the EULA always seems to be the proprietary manufacturer trying to use it to
write laws on the fly. The same with revising the EULA everytime a patch is issued. Why should a bug fix change the terms under which I can use the software that I
bought?