Topic: U.S.S. Inaieu NCC-2003 Peacekeeper Class Drone Battlecruiser (Read 6179 times)

ModelsPlease · « **on:** January 29, 2007, 11:59:30 pm »

OUTALANCE SHIPYARDS
U.S.S. Inaieu NCC-2003
Peacekeeper Class Drone Battlecruiser

Owner: United Federation of Planets
Class: Heavy Combat Vessel
Availability: Unlimited Deployment
In Service: 2288
Out of Service: n/a

These unique vessels have gained the respect and admiration of their crews because of their handling characteristics and offensive capabilities.
The overall design came from OutaLance design teams contracted to create a cruiser with drone missiles as its main weapons.
The Peacekeeper Class forms the core of all squadrons in the famed 'Blue Fleet', and is an integral part of front line forces for Star Fleet.
As with all Star Fleet vessels, the engines can be jettisoned in case of an overload in the matter/anti-matter chamber.
The most unusual feature of this vessel is the weapons array.
Mounting two photon torpedo launchers fore and 2 facing aft, and 10 missile launchers, it well deserves its informal name of 'missile boat'.
Due to the number of missiles and the ranges at which they are most effective, these vessels normally operate in combat at 120,000 km.
The Peacekeeper Class has been encountered and engaged by both Romulan and Klingon forces, which were taken by surprise when the Star Fleet vessel fired a spread of drones whose number was unexpected.
In each case, the enemy withdrew from the field of battle before the cruiser could be fully put to the test.
-------------------
Author: ModelsPlease
Models By: p81,Moonraker
Textures: GAFY?, ModelsPlease
Kitbashed by: ModelsPlease
HP/DP and Scale: ModelsPlease

http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/files/dist/index.php/file,540c72da2afc8a2880f427b78eb79d2f.rar

S31-Riptide · « **Reply #1 on:** January 30, 2007, 08:29:19 am »

Nice work man... very unique... stands out nicely in a croud

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #2 on:** January 30, 2007, 09:53:14 am »

That is definitely an interesting design. Nice use of the Oberth-style nacelles, too. She really does look like a wet-navy vessel.

Wasn't the 2003 Inaieu a Defender-class battleship from Diane Duane's 'Rihannsu' book series?

http://startrek.wikia.com/wiki/Defender_class

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #3 on:** January 30, 2007, 11:14:41 am »

Quote from: Scottish Andy on January 30, 2007, 09:53:14 am

That is definitely an interesting design. Nice use of the Oberth-style nacelles, too. She really does look like a wet-navy vessel.

Wasn't the 2003 Inaieu a Defender-class battleship from Diane Duane's 'Rihannsu' book series?

http://startrek.wikia.com/wiki/Defender_class

Nope mine is based on the Excelsior Class U.S.S. Inaieu NCC-2003

, I don't see novels as a canon source.

Greenvalv · « **Reply #4 on:** January 30, 2007, 03:44:03 pm »

I love the naval look about it...

Rhaz · « **Reply #5 on:** January 30, 2007, 07:40:35 pm »

Very cool design MP!

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #6 on:** January 31, 2007, 12:33:00 am »

Quote

I love the naval look about it...

Exactly what I was going for

Thanks for the positive imput guys

markyd · « **Reply #7 on:** February 01, 2007, 11:03:04 am »

very nice m8

Mackie · « **Reply #8 on:** February 01, 2007, 03:07:33 pm »

Congrats! :O now this is what i'd call a good goddamn job!

Starforce2 · « **Reply #9 on:** March 10, 2007, 01:54:03 pm »

what exactly do drones do in combat again?

Dizzy · « **Reply #10 on:** March 10, 2007, 05:58:05 pm »

I LIKE this idea. Quite a departure from the usual... catchy. Ever thought about doing a take on the Photon chucker, Andor?

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #11 on:** March 12, 2007, 04:14:42 pm »

Quote from: Dizzy on March 10, 2007, 05:58:05 pm

I LIKE this idea. Quite a departure from the usual... catchy. Ever thought about doing a take on the Photon chucker, Andor?

I could

. I'll think on what I can do with it.

Don Karnage · « **Reply #12 on:** March 17, 2007, 10:52:24 pm »

but the number 2003 should be in the excelsior class, this one use the hull of and excelsior but not the class, also the lack of phaser will make it vulnerable to attack when the run out of drone.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #13 on:** March 19, 2007, 11:05:44 pm »

Quote from: DonKarnage on March 17, 2007, 10:52:24 pm

but the number 2003 should be in the excelsior class, this one use the hull of and excelsior but not the class, also the lack of phaser will make it vulnerable to attack when the run out of drone.

Looks like an Excelsior varient to me, as for lack of phasers........ exactly shoot smart, fly smart or die

Lieutenant_Q · « **Reply #14 on:** March 20, 2007, 02:00:46 am »

SFC has the 2003 listed as the USS Al-Batani. The ship Janeway first served on.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #15 on:** March 20, 2007, 10:00:54 am »

Quote from: Lieutenant_Q on March 20, 2007, 02:00:46 am

SFC has the 2003 listed as the USS Al-Batani. The ship Janeway first served on.

Wrong information.
U.S.S. Al-Batani NCC-42995.("Caretaker" [VGR #1&2]).

Excelsior-class.
Type of Federation starship classified as an explorer. Called "The Great Experiment," the Excelsior-class was developed in the 2280s as a testbed for transwarp drive and other revolutionary enhancements to Starfleet vessels. After the failure of transwarp physics, the class was retrofit with standard warp drive and quickly proved itself as one of the most durable and powerful designs, replacing the Constitution-class as the backbone of the Starfleet. ("The Search for Spock" [Movie #3]; "The Undiscovered Country" [Movie #6]).
U.S.S. Achilles (FASA Officer's Manual [TNG])
U.S.S. Al-Batani NCC-42995.("Caretaker" [VGR #1&2]).
U.S.S. America, NCC 21490 ["The Dominion War" (SO)]
U.S.S. Berlin ("Wet Behind the Ears" [DC TNG vol.2 #32]).
U.S.S. Cairo NCC-42136 ("Chain of Command" [TNG #136&137]; "Vacation's Over" [Malibu DS9 Maquis #1]; "In the Pale Moonlight" [DS9 #143]).
U.S.S. Charleston NCC-42285 (“The Neutral Zone” [TNG]).
U.S.S. Chicago, NCC 22952 ["The Dominion War" (SO)]
U.S.S. Columbia NCC-2002
U.S.S. Crazy Horse NCC-50446
U.S.S. Crockett NCC-38955 ["Pirates of Omega Ronas" (SO)]
U.S.S. Dedalo, NCC 20184
U.S.S. Excelsior NX-2000
U.S.S. Excelsior NCC-2000
U.S.S. Fearless NCC-14598
U.S.S. Frederickson NCC-42111
U.S.S. Gorkon NCC-40521 ("Descent" [TNG]).
U.S.S. Grissom NCC-42857("Once Burned" [Pocket Captain's Table]).
U.S.S. Hernandez, NCC 39755 ["The Choice"]
U.S.S. Hood NCC-42296
U.S.S. Inaieu NCC-2003
U.S.S. Intrepid NCC 38907 ("Sins of the Father" [TNG #65]; "Family" [TNG #78]).
U.S.S. Lexington NCC-14427
U.S.S. Livingston NCC-34099
U.S.S. Malinche NCC-38997 ("For the Uniform" [DS9 #111]).
U.S.S. Melbourne NCC-62043 ("11001001" [TNG #16]; "The Best of Both Worlds" [TNG #74&75]; "Emissary" [DS9 #1&2]).
U.S.S. Okinawa NCC-13958 ("Homefront" [DS9]; "Paradise Lost" [DS9]).
U.S.S. Potemkin NCC-18253
U.S.S. Repulse NCC-2544 ("The Child" [TNG #27]; "Unnatural Selection" [TNG]; "Vendetta" [Pocket TNG Giant #2]).
U.S.S. Roosevelt NCC-2573
U.S.S. Slayton ("Rogue" [Pocket Section 31 #2]).
U.S.S. Tecumseh NCC-14934 ("Nor the Battle to the Strong" [DS9]).
U.S.S. Valiant NCC-2018
*Lakota sub-class*
U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-B
U.S.S. Lakota NCC-42768
U.S.S. Valley Forge NCC-43305 ("Tears of the Prophets" [DS9 #150]).
U.S.S. Yamashiro NCC-2494

Anthony Scott · « **Reply #16 on:** March 24, 2007, 12:03:03 am »

Ye gods...that's a big ship! Can't blame the bad guys buggin' out without even a little exchange of pleasantries!

Semper Fi, Carry On

News: