Topic: U.S.S. KODIAK NCC-6000 Kodiak Class Battleship (Read 6290 times)

ModelsPlease · « **on:** January 17, 2007, 11:50:01 pm »

This was always one of my favorite designs.............

OUTALANCE SHIPYARDS
U.S.S. KODIAK NCC-6000
Kodiak Class Battleship

Owner: United Federation of Planets
Type: Capital Ship
In Service: 2273
Out of Service: N/A
Source: Jackill's Star Fleet Reference Manual Volume 2
----------------------
In February 2273 the "Kodiak" (NCC-6000) class battleship was authorized for construction.
A warship designed as a capital assault ship and command flagship, the "Kodiak" class has warp 9 maximum speed, a complement of 700, and a full array of firepower consisting of 20 phasers, 6 megaphaser cannons, and 8 torpedo banks.
18 ships (NCC-6000-NCC-6017) out of a proposed 20 entered service.
----------------------
Author: ModelsPlease
Ship Design: Eric Kristiansen [JHRM2]
Kitbashed by: ModelsPlease
Models: p81, Mackie, Atheorhaven
Textures modified/added by: Atheorhaven, GotAFarmYet?, ModelsPlease
Registry: Centurus, ModelsPlease
Scaling: ModelsPlease
Hard/Damage Points: ModelsPlease
Illumination: p81, Atheorhaven, ModelsPlease

http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/files/dist/index.php/file,9c0c8d6f3def405470be0bd9903e9a07.rar

Chrystoff · « **Reply #1 on:** January 17, 2007, 11:53:18 pm »

Well done MP, as always. This was quite an unexpected and welcome suprise.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #2 on:** January 17, 2007, 11:57:22 pm »

Thanks Chrystoff, Versions for SFC I and II EAW/OP included

.

Don Karnage · « **Reply #3 on:** January 18, 2007, 05:53:17 am »

a old ship from eras of war

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #4 on:** January 18, 2007, 08:11:24 am »

Quote from: DonKarnage on January 18, 2007, 05:53:17 am

a old ship from eras of war

No a brand new kitbash by yours truly

Don Karnage · « **Reply #5 on:** January 18, 2007, 10:35:22 am »

here a proof

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #6 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:24:36 pm »

You misunderstood. I meant mine was not the old model but a new kitbash

Don Karnage · « **Reply #7 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:57:52 pm »

i know, you mean new texture not new mod

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #8 on:** January 18, 2007, 05:17:02 pm »

I think there were more Kodiaks made besides MP's and the EAW one... If only one or two others, of course. I think one was made for SFC1, but it's been a while since I've touched SFC (real life working/learning).

You didn't do so much a bad job, MP... But the forward dish looks a bit big for my taste.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #9 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:55:42 pm »

Quote from: Chris Johnson on January 18, 2007, 05:17:02 pm

I think there were more Kodiaks made besides MP's and the EAW one... If only one or two others, of course. I think one was made for SFC1, but it's been a while since I've touched SFC (real life working/learning).

You didn't do so much a bad job, MP... But the forward dish looks a bit big for my taste.

There's the Kodiak II and the United States

Don Karnage · « **Reply #10 on:** January 19, 2007, 10:07:24 am »

Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on January 18, 2007, 04:13:33 pm

He means new model, new textures, new HP,DP and partrige in a pair tree

what is DP and partrige?

what are the difference with the one from eras of war?

Scottish Andy · « **Reply #11 on:** January 19, 2007, 10:19:29 am »

MP, it's a nice model, though I agree with Chris that the forward deflector looks too big.

I just don't like gun-bunny ships like these. The design is fugly. It's better thought-out than most FASA or FASA-inspired designs (Andor! Northampton! Aieeeeeee!!!!), but it's still a bad ship. Even Kirk's Starfleet wouldn't have built this.

Check out this piece. I agree with it wholeheartedly.

http://phoenixinn.iwarp.com/startrek/files/gunrant.html

Gene Roddenberry himself, in his novelisation of 'Star Trek - The Motion Picture', said (and I'm paraphrasing here) that even though the refitted Enterprise was classified as a "heavy cruiser", she was really a battleship as she was the most powerful ship the Federation had yet produced.

Admittedly, I'm on a lost cause here as I love playing this starship combat simulator, but I still like my ship designs to have some aesthetic value, some balance of design, some logical, rational thought behind the arrangement of components.

Bleh. [/rant].

Vipre · « **Reply #12 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:35:48 pm »

Very nice work MP.

I myself have never been fond of the mix Miranda/Connie designs. The design reasons for the rollbar and mounted torpedo module as well as the melded primary and secondary hull in the Miranda would one not be included in any ship this shape and two more importantly not be needed. Why externally mount a torpedo module when the base of the neck pylon has a spot with clear line of sight for front or rear firing torpedo tubes. I've also never understood the rear mounted deflector dish, even in the Franz Joseph dreadnaught designs, they're just not needed as last I heard starships can't travel a high reverse impulse speeds as there are no forward facing impulse engine ports.

The size of a deflector it seems would also be in proportion with relation to the size of the ship itself, example being if the ship is 50% larger than a Constitution class ship then the deflector would be 50% larger than a Connie's dish. Of course this doesn't take into account miniaturization due to new technology. Location of several components comes into play as well. the "mega" phasers mounted on the bottom rear seem to be on a pylon about twice as long as would be needed since you only would need clear LOS under the ventral torpedo tubes.

As a personal note I call into question the existance of mega phasers anyway. I don't see why a Miranda class ship would be given weapons that by their very name would seem to outgun anything on the Constitution starship. More likely they are regular phasers that in the Miranda were mounted on the rollbar to increase firepower without having to rewire the saucers weapons "relays" or whatever.

News: