Topic: Kriegswolf... (Read 3249 times)

Starforce2 · « **Reply #1 on:** January 01, 2007, 08:15:29 pm »

cousin of the soulwolf? Looks slick.

Star Dragon · « **Reply #2 on:** January 02, 2007, 02:16:55 am »

It's another winner.
Oh man, and I was about to suggest something similar to the Courageous...

Just can't Trump Atolm, he's already thought of any twisted/cool design you can Humanly think of.

"How about this one?... Nope I already (insert: Drew it, Dreamnt it, Saw it floating in my cereal this morning)...

(kidding)

Terradyhne · « **Reply #3 on:** January 02, 2007, 08:42:02 am »

your paintings look good but personally i don't like the most of your designs

Starforce2 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 02, 2007, 11:02:46 am »

I think you should try without the pylon. the nacelles look attached anyways, sorta like the eximus of cleeve..wtf the pylon for? Other than to stick out like a sore thumb? seems silly to me.

Don Karnage · « **Reply #5 on:** January 02, 2007, 01:02:14 pm »

nice ship, but the phaser rail should be remove to put fix phaser would make a bether look to it.

intermech · « **Reply #6 on:** January 02, 2007, 01:39:59 pm »

Quote

I think you should try without the pylon. the nacelles look attached anyways, sorta like the eximus of cleeve..wtf the pylon for? Other than to stick out like a sore thumb? seems silly to me.

It looks like the pylons have plasma vents on them, could be a way of ducting the plasma safely to the nacells while keeping dangerous materials away from the crew. In which case the pylons are no longer a supporting element, but are still required.

I like the partitioned saucer section, and the illusion that the ends of the warp engines curve inward. I would like to see a more blunted saucer, but that change may take away from the overall tone of the ship.

Great work Atolm!

Atolm-Rising · « **Reply #7 on:** January 03, 2007, 06:40:25 pm »

the pylons are there for added structual support and the vents are for what they are always used for(venting plasma)
thanks all

Terra, you might want to ellaborate what it is about my stuff that you find "well done, but not to your liking", because it always seems that is always your reply to my stuff in general. I mean is it that its too far fetch for you to contend with? Or that it doesn't seem to be as lacking in aestitic as the FASA or SFB(BTW not all of the designs from FASA and SFB are bad, IMO, but some 90% are...)? Or that my stuff doesn't confine itself to the "rules" of a sci-fi show that doesn't even follow its own "rules"? I mean seriously, I'm not calling you out or nothing, but it seems that every design I pop out doesn't sit well with you enough that you have to voice it in practically every thread in practically the same way and to me its getting a tad annoying.
I am more than willing to listen to what you feel a good Trek ship is "suppose" to look like mate. I mean damn, I know I cannot please everyone...but this is getting a tad redundant, don't you think?

Fedman NCC-3758 · « **Reply #8 on:** January 11, 2007, 09:24:40 pm »

Looks fine by me.

And I'm a traditionalist.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #9 on:** January 11, 2007, 10:43:30 pm »

I have to say a phaser rail works perfect for this design. I can't see any reason to use a TMP or earlier fixed phaser mount on such an advanced design. That would be the same as putting a Ford Model T engine in a Ferrari F60

Tus-XC · « **Reply #10 on:** January 11, 2007, 11:52:42 pm »

fellas, this ship ain't tmp.... if i'm not mistaken she is post tng...

Terradyhne · « **Reply #11 on:** January 12, 2007, 03:41:50 am »

Quote from: Atolm-Rising on January 03, 2007, 06:40:25 pm

the pylons are there for added structual support and the vents are for what they are always used for(venting plasma)
thanks all

Terra, you might want to ellaborate what it is about my stuff that you find "well done, but not to your liking", because it always seems that is always your reply to my stuff in general. I mean is it that its too far fetch for you to contend with? Or that it doesn't seem to be as lacking in aestitic as the FASA or SFB(BTW not all of the designs from FASA and SFB are bad, IMO, but some 90% are...)? Or that my stuff doesn't confine itself to the "rules" of a sci-fi show that doesn't even follow its own "rules"? I mean seriously, I'm not calling you out or nothing, but it seems that every design I pop out doesn't sit well with you enough that you have to voice it in practically every thread in practically the same way and to me its getting a tad annoying.
I am more than willing to listen to what you feel a good Trek ship is "suppose" to look like mate. I mean damn, I know I cannot please everyone...but this is getting a tad redundant, don't you think?

well i don't like the most of those post TNG Fed designs and the most of your NX-era designs
most of your post TNG Klingon, Romulan and Cardassian designs are good but i'm not good at making later designs than Kirk TMP era
TMP is my favorite era and the most FASA designs are from that era but no one of you designers makes good TMP era designs and when there is a new design than mostly Federation and that sucks
isn't there anyone out there creative enough to make some new TMP era non fed designs ??
i'm not good at designing and only half as good than other on modelling

sorry that i have been so bad on the most of your designs you have shown.

PS.: i hate all Reman designs in general because they look like a big piece of flyin yunk and all those NX-era designs because they are to advanced to be pre TOS

News: