Topic: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels  (Read 12987 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2003, 11:20:28 am »
Quote:

I'm telling you, J'inn, you and Kroma are either the same person, or you are adopting his writing style!!  




Rumor has it J'inn was spotted at a local establishment that specializes in tutu's for the big and tall. Guess my style is rubbing off, much like a nasty case of the clap.

J'inn

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #21 on: March 10, 2003, 11:41:57 am »
NOW STOP THAT!!!

I got enough stress in my life right now without you weasels adding to it!!

And no Chuut, I have no idea where you could find a picture of a fat lizard wearing a white fur coat!!

Have I mentioned that I hate you all??  Tsk.  How remiss of me. I blame myself for slacking in my duties.

My fury will know no bounds once DOE starts up.  

DOE = Death Of Every Jinn Basher.   (yeah it's a streach but it's all I could come up with)




 

LongTooth

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2003, 11:52:17 am »
Quote:

NOW STOP THAT!!!

I got enough stress in my life right now without you weasels adding to it!!

And no Chuut, I have no idea where you could find a picture of a fat lizard wearing a white fur coat!!

Have I mentioned that I hate you all??  Tsk.  How remiss of me. I blame myself for slacking in my duties.

My fury will know no bounds once DOE starts up.  

DOE = Death Of Every Jinn Basher.   (yeah it's a streach but it's all I could come up with)




 



STREACH its only up for a few weeks youll never get us all by then

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2003, 11:57:56 am »
Quote:


And no Chuut, I have no idea where you could find a picture of a fat lizard wearing a white fur coat!!
 




How about a fat white cat in a tutu then?

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #24 on: March 10, 2003, 12:20:29 pm »
Quote:

I'm telling you, J'inn, you and Kroma are either the same person, . . .




Nope.  Kroma's a dangerous pilot . . .  

NuclearWessels

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #25 on: March 10, 2003, 12:22:29 pm »
Quote:

NOW STOP THAT!!!...
And no Chuut, I have no idea where you could find a picture of a fat lizard wearing a white fur coat!!
...
 




Would you settle for a busty lizard in a slip and a white coat?

http://www.toymania.com/columns/rtmisc/rglizardbustpics.shtml

Who knew how far Kroma's influence had spread?

dave
   

KRolling

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #26 on: March 10, 2003, 01:09:55 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

I'm telling you, J'inn, you and Kroma are either the same person, . . .




Nope.  Kroma's a dangerous pilot . . .  





Maybe.... but I think he has a split personality.

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #27 on: March 10, 2003, 03:41:31 pm »
Looks like nobody has any kind words (or words of any kind?)  for the WER's and KE's. Maybe if they were cheaper to cloak they would have some popularity. Otherwise travel in numbers. Perhaps there should be no rank requirements to run a WE fleet.  

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #28 on: March 10, 2003, 03:52:27 pm »
Hopefully he's axed the WB+...  and I actually *like* the King Eagle.

KBF-Dogmatix

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #29 on: March 10, 2003, 04:39:54 pm »
Quote:



When you say B upgrades you do meen b rack upgrades right  






God, I hope so!


 

KBF-Dogmatix

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #30 on: March 10, 2003, 04:40:38 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm not so upset about running Fed for this campaign then....then again I haven't seen their ship choices yet.....Bruce anyone????  





You'll feel bad enough when your KBF brothers are wacking you out in their sub-standard WEs and KEs, petaQ!  


 




I'll be gald to give you a nice warm Photonic enema DogBoy!!!  





WAKE UP, MACE!  Time to die!


 

Pardek

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2003, 06:14:14 pm »
  no Klingon hulls huh,well as long as you left the SNA in there im happy.



 
 

Cmdr. Krotz

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2003, 07:14:18 pm »
Herr Burt-

It is certainly not my wish to chase you back into your asbestos-lined panic room; however, as a concerned Coalition member, I do have a couple issues lingering in my mind (I'm sure you've addressed them in your work already, just haven't had cause to mention anything about it   ):

1. Pricing- Kestrels make up the bulk of typical heavy cruiser priced hulls. The majority of the Heavy Hawks, with the notable exceptions of the SuperHawk and the RoyalHawk (based off the price of the SUA rather than the NHK for some reason), are priced in the low end of the BCH price ranges; I am uncertain as to how much of an issue that could really be in practical terms, but it may invite some consideration....

2. It is generally common knowledge that some comparatively "esoteric" variants can be quite popular among players of all sides. If Kestrels are being nixxed as being too limited in deployment, is it safe to assume we should not be seeing limited production vessels for Alliance forces outside of random AI encounters?

I sincerely apologize beforehand if anything combustible should be found in this post...  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2003, 08:26:08 pm »
Someone tell Warlock to break out the marshmallows.

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2003, 09:47:45 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I guess I'm not so upset about running Fed for this campaign then....then again I haven't seen their ship choices yet.....Bruce anyone????  





You'll feel bad enough when your KBF brothers are wacking you out in their sub-standard WEs and KEs, petaQ!  


 




I'll be gald to give you a nice warm Photonic enema DogBoy!!!  





WAKE UP, MACE!  Time to die!


 




Lighten up Leon.    

TheMaverick

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2003, 09:53:34 pm »
No no he's right your going down feddy =)

jimmi7769

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #36 on: March 10, 2003, 10:00:45 pm »
Quote:

No no he's right your going down feddy =)  




I think we've all had enough of your mouth you traitorous pig!!!
 

TheMaverick

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2003, 10:02:55 pm »
LMAO I figured that was coming lol... And I'll have you know that's Traitors pig CAT... bald pig cat

DH123

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #38 on: March 10, 2003, 10:44:57 pm »
Quote:

Looks like nobody has any kind words (or words of any kind?)  for the WER's and KE's. Maybe if they were cheaper to cloak they would have some popularity. Otherwise travel in numbers. Perhaps there should be no rank requirements to run a WE fleet.    




As much as it pains me to agree with Cleaven, maybe cloak costs should be lowered on all non-Kestral hulls for a test server.  Cloak is not as effective as it was in SFB so maybe it should only cost 75% as much power?  

Maxillius

  • Guest
Re: DOE Flame thread #1: Kestrels
« Reply #39 on: March 10, 2003, 10:55:51 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Looks like nobody has any kind words (or words of any kind?)  for the WER's and KE's. Maybe if they were cheaper to cloak they would have some popularity. Otherwise travel in numbers. Perhaps there should be no rank requirements to run a WE fleet.    




As much as it pains me to agree with Cleaven, maybe cloak costs should be lowered on all non-Kestral hulls for a test server.  Cloak is not as effective as it was in SFB so maybe it should only cost 75% as much power?  




Curious... how effective is the SFB cloak?