Topic: bridge size comparison (Read 3401 times)

Don Karnage · « **on:** August 20, 2006, 12:26:44 am »

i discover that on the net, not sure if its accurate, but if it is how come the bridge of the enterprise 1701-A change so much in so little time?

Bonk · « **Reply #1 on:** August 20, 2006, 11:06:28 am »

Set designers need work too!

Don Karnage · « **Reply #2 on:** August 20, 2006, 12:42:49 pm »

here the link: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~tweimann/tmp/bridge-blueprints%20updated/bridge%20size%20comparison.jpg

biger image so you can see and compare each other

Skaren · « **Reply #3 on:** August 20, 2006, 01:24:01 pm »

Cause it is a movie

Vipre · « **Reply #4 on:** August 20, 2006, 04:30:51 pm »

agreed ...cause it's a movie...though the trek nut answer is "Modular bridge design" The entire bridge is designed to be detached from the saucer and replaced as per mission specs. Also the stations lining the outer bridge are modular and designed to be added/removed as needed for each mission.

Commander Maxillius · « **Reply #5 on:** September 12, 2006, 12:23:49 am »

If starships were buildings the bridge would be a basic large room with power points all over the floors and wall and equipment would just be rolled in and out as needed.

Infact, I think starships would be that way if they didn't think consoles would silde all over the place in battle

News: