I think the best thing is to stop acting like this is a game instead of a simulation, not everyone is supposed to be on par with everyone else.
Hell, it ain't good enough for folks that the klinks that they will have the only BB?
What you propose sounds like the Treaty for the Limitation and Reduction of Naval Armament of 1930.
'You will only build ships up to 30,000 tons, only arm them with up to 9 16" guns and up to 20 secondary guns....'
Whoops didn't know this was serious..
With the ability to field one while the Feds field 2xDNH's, not really (have to ask the Klinks though-I dunno)
And ~ simply for fed/klink baalnce
With the Feds having better attrition units (fighters) before PF's
With the Feds getting better attrtion unit after PF's (..uhmm PF)
With the Feds having the best metal (DNH,DNL,DVL)
Feds having better CF
Feds having better carriers (across the board- did I mention the better fighter as well?)
Feds getting the CS+
BCH's are easily a trade off (I;d give advantage C7, but keep hearing the BCF is somehow good?)
Klinks get a trade off (heck call it a better) CWL
and easily (imo anyway) a better droner
Yes it's a game, based on a game
A Game based on a game that worked it's balance through the idea the "good guys get good stuff, bad guys get numbers"
Something we can't approximate here.
I think they're doing a good job trying to balance the stuff. I just think they've started to go to places they didn't need to.
(again-why do the Kzin need a ship to fight plasma? Are the plasma races getting a better hex flipper earlier?)