Topic: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete  (Read 5734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

intermech

  • Guest
Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« on: May 13, 2006, 02:26:17 pm »
Finally, my Triumph class light cruser is complete, the only problem I am having it figuring out which era it is. . .


Offline AlchemistiD

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 440
  • Gender: Male
  • No Replacement For Displacement
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2006, 05:17:02 pm »
She looks like she could fit in Late/Post TNG to me.


Offline Starforce2

  • Bridge Commander Ambassador
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2827
    • Nightsoft SFC File Dump
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2006, 11:27:53 pm »
looks like a C-era ship possibly with a dominion war upgrade to the hull plating and weapons. Or it could fit as unupgraded, mindblip had a similar lifepod and plating style on some of his C-era.

Offline ModelsPlease

  • Retired Model Junkie
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4665
  • Gender: Male
  • ModelsPlease
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2006, 04:07:04 am »
Agreed a C era ship

ModelsPlease, resident "Model Junkie" recovering from a tragic crayon sharpener accident.

Offline Chris Johnson

  • I used to be a Captain a forum or two ago...
  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 817
  • Gender: Male
  • Hai! Hai!
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2006, 02:31:22 pm »
Agreed a C era ship

The term I'd use would be "Pre-TNG" or "Ambassador-era" (2320s-2340s) but I agree as well since I believe that's what we're thinking.

"Oh, shut up!" -- Wil Wheaton to Wesley Crusher

intermech

  • Guest
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2006, 07:54:29 pm »
I like the idea of labling the era alphabetically as oposed to show or series name. I guess if that is the case you would have NX, A, B, C, D, and E, what would you call Original Series era?  Another way to refer to it could be similar to historical era references.

Invention (ENT: proto-Federation worlds are just aquiring the means to stretch out into the galaxy),

Exploration (TOS: five year mission are common for a century or so to boldly go. . . . Many ships lost with out a trace),

Colonial (TMP/post TMP: Inhabitants of the Federation look towards expanding to worlds to which they are not native (Genesis Device an example of this interest??), as new cultures are encountered , they join the Federation, those that don't ie. Cardassians become enemies),

Imperial (TNG: most of the Enterprise's missions included watching after and defending established Federation Territories few new planetary discoveries, borders between empires are clear and constant, Huge war over established territorites: Dominion War), . . .

Temporal (far future, time travel prevailent).

Anymore ideas?

Offline ModelsPlease

  • Retired Model Junkie
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4665
  • Gender: Male
  • ModelsPlease
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2006, 10:26:30 pm »
Why mess with what already works ?


ModelsPlease, resident "Model Junkie" recovering from a tragic crayon sharpener accident.

Offline mikeholt

  • CLO Nightsoft
  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Gender: Male
    • Nightsoft
Re: Triumph Mesh and Textures complete
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2006, 05:37:32 pm »
In the office, we use Early (our monikor for ENT, which we do not want to use), Pre-TOS, TOS, TMP, Lost (as in lost era), TNG, Post-TNG (as in post TNG era, including the post-Dominion war era) and Late ( Late era, anything past Nemesis).

Early
Pre-TOS
TOS
TMP
Lost
TNG
Post-TNG
Late

I dont know if anyone would find them useful.
Blade: [noticing vampire tattoo] You're human.
Kounen: Barely. I'm a lawyer.