Topic: New ion propulsion engine puts the edges of the solar system within reach  (Read 2566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
Europeans And Australians Make Space Propulsion Breakthrough

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060112040320.htm

The European Space Agency and the Australian National University have successfully tested a new design of spacecraft ion engine that dramatically improves performance over present thrusters and marks a major step forward in space propulsion capability.



DS4G thruster firing during tests in the ESTEC Electric Propulsion facility (CORONA vacuum chamber). (Credit: ESA)
 
 Related News Stories 
Deep Space Mission Ion Engine Passes 8,000-Hour Endurance Test (October 11, 1997) -- Ion engine propulsion, a futuristic form of spacecraft propulsion referred to in science fiction novels and films for decades, is one step closer to becoming a reality. On September 25, JPL completed ... > full story

Ion Engine Design Passes Key NASA Test (December 25, 2003) -- A team of engineers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif, successfully tested a new ion propulsion engine design, one of several candidate propulsion technologies under study by ... > full story

NASA Successfully Tests Ion Engine (November 21, 2003) -- NASA's Project Prometheus recently reached an important milestone with the first successful test of an engine that could lead to revolutionary propulsion capabilities for space exploration ... > full story

SMART-1 Ion Engine Fired Successfully (October 2, 2003) -- Engineers at ESOC, the European Space Agency's control centre in Darmstadt, Germany, sent a command to begin the firing test, which lasted for one hour. Now in space and in a true vacuum, the ion ... > full story

> more related stories


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related sections: Space & Time
Matter & Energy

 
 
 
 
Ion engines are a form of electric propulsion and work by accelerating a beam of positively charged particles (or ions) away from the spacecraft using an electric field. ESA is currently using electric propulsion on its Moon mission, SMART-1. The new engine is over ten times more fuel efficient than the one used on SMART-1. “Using a similar amount of propellant as SMART-1, with the right power supply, a future spacecraft using our new engine design wouldn’t just reach the Moon, it would be able to leave the Solar System entirely,” says Dr Roger Walker of ESA’s Advanced Concepts Team, Research Fellow in Advanced Propulsion and Technical Manager of the project.

The new experimental engine, called the Dual-Stage 4-Grid (DS4G) ion thruster, was designed and built under a contract with ESA in the extremely short time of four months by a dedicated team at the Australian National University. “The success of the DS4G prototype shows what can be achieved with the passion and drive of a capable and committed team. It was an incredible experience to work with ESA to transform such an elegant idea into a record-breaking reality”, says Dr. Orson Sutherland, the engine’s designer and head of the development team at the ANU. During November 2005, the DS4G engine was tested for the first time in ESA’s Electric Propulsion Laboratory at ESTEC in the Netherlands, with support from Dr Sutherland and ESA test engineers.

Traditional ion engines use three closely separated perforated grids containing thousands of millimetre-sized holes attached to a chamber containing a reservoir of the charged particles. The first grid has thousands of volts applied, and the second grid operates at low voltage. The voltage difference over the gap between the two grids creates an electric field that acts to simultaneously extract and accelerate the ions out of the chamber and into space in a single step. The higher the voltage difference, the faster the ions are expelled and the greater the fuel efficiency of the thruster. However, at higher voltage differences approaching five thousand volts (5kV), some of the ions collide with the second grid as they are accelerated, thus eroding and damaging the grid and thereby limiting its lifetime in space.

The DS4G ion engine utilises a different concept first proposed in 2001 by David Fearn, a pioneer of ion propulsion in the UK, which solves this limitation by performing a two-stage process to decouple the extraction and acceleration of ions using four grids. In the first stage, the first two grids are closely spaced and both are operated at very high voltage and a low voltage difference between the two (3 kV) enables the ions to be safely extracted from the chamber without hitting the grids. Then, in the second stage, two more grids are positioned at a greater distance ‘downstream’ and operated at low voltages. The high voltage difference between the two pairs of grids powerfully accelerates the extracted ions.

The test model achieved voltage differences as high as 30kV and produced an ion exhaust plume that travelled at 210,000 m/s, over four times faster than state-of-the-art ion engine designs achieve. This makes it four times more fuel efficient, and also enables an engine design which is many times more compact than present thrusters, allowing the design to be scaled up in size to operate at high power and thrust. Due to the very high acceleration, the ion exhaust plume was very narrow, diverging by only 3 degrees, which is five times narrower than present systems. This reduces the fuel needed to correct the orientation of spacecraft from small uncertainties in the thrust direction.

There is of course still a great deal of work to be done before the new engine design can fly in space. “Working with our industrial partners, the next challenge is to transition this promising new engine design from laboratory experiment to spacecraft flight model and properly define the new missions that it will enable”, says José Gonzalez del Amo, Head of Electric Propulsion at ESA. The flight-suitable engines must then be tested: and for ion engines this is a long process.

Since they must operate continuously in space for tens of thousands of hours providing a small thrust, ground tests in a vacuum facility must last several thousand hours to prove their reliability. Only after all this could the first flight models be launched.

Once ready, these engines will be able to propel spacecraft to the outermost planets, the newly discovered planetoids beyond Pluto and even further, into the unknown realm of interstellar space beyond the Solar System. Closer to home, these supercharged ion engines could figure prominently in the human exploration of space. With an adequate supply of electrical power, a small cluster of larger, high power versions of the new engine design would provide enough thrust to propel a crewed spacecraft to Mars and back.

“This is an ultra-ion engine. It has exceeded the current crop by many times and opens up a whole new frontier of exploration possibilities,” says Dr Walker.


Editor's Note: The original news release can be found here.


Offline Bonk

  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13298
  • You don't have to live like a refugee.
Cool, now this is real "rocket-science".  8)

This technology always reminds me of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy techniques, and ion-drive technologies may well end up providing useful technology for ICP-MS and spectroscopy as a side benefit.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Still needs to scale up well enough for use as a launch engine.  Launch technology needs a significant breakthrough.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline E_Look

  • Grand High Scribe
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6446
Gentlemen, as far as I know and understand, you can't really get any significant instantaneous thrust or acceleration out of an ion engine; I think they're intended for long missions.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Gentlemen, as far as I know and understand, you can't really get any significant instantaneous thrust or acceleration out of an ion engine; I think they're intended for long missions.

Not yet and maybe never.  However it has superb exhaust velocity where it lacks is the rate at which it expells reaction mass.  To be a launch engine ion drives need to significantly increase the rate of expelling reaction mass.   They would also need to use less unfriendly chemicals for reaction mass than current ion drives do. 

This experimental engine seems to increase the specific impulse by both increasing the exhaust velocity and narrowing the exhaust plume.  It also seems to result in smaller engines.  If the smaller engine could be made in small diameter it is at least conceivable that they could be bundled together (possibly sharing components to reduce mass) in a way that would allow the increased rate of reaction mass expulsion allowing it to be a usable launch engine.

Such a propulsion system for interplanetary uses would allow larger probes to other planets.  Faster flight times also means less trouble making systems to take the vacuum and radiation in space.  Alternatively equivalent effort on durability could be made resulting in longer time at the target doing the job it was designed for.  More orbital probes rather than just flybys.

Another use is in Earth orbit as an orbital transfer vehicle.  Use a conventional rocket to take satellites (or ISS components/ supplies) to very low orbit and let an ion drive orbital transfer vehicle take days or weeks to move it to the right orbit.  With orbital refueling of the ion engine major cost savings might be achieved.  Even recovery of satellites (like the Hubble or its successors) with the transfer vehicle bringing the satellite to a repair mission in very low orbit might well be practical.

Unlikely perhaps, possible yes.  In any case if it lives up to the article it could be an engine for manned missions as far as the asteroids or even Jupiter.   

In short even if useless (as is likely) for launch it may still be of major use to the space programs of the world. 

As I said "Launch technology needs a significant breakthrough."  This is probably not it but it might just be on the trail.  An ion drive ramjet capable of using the air itself would make an excellent drive if it had a high enough rate of exhausting the reaction mass even if it needed to be boosted into the air by a more conventional engine such as a jet.  One major problem with ion drives as a launch technology is an electrical power source, most would be too heavy or too low power.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
well now it seems unlikely it can be used for launches but when the Wright Brothers plane first fley the engine was barely capable of a seconds long flight. look at 'em now.

Offline Death_Merchant

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3639
  • Gender: Male
Ahhhh Gentlemen.....

Use math. Math helps. Math is good, just don't say that on a first (or even second) date...
Lookie here: it's like conservation of momentum, eh?

Thrust is equivalent to the impulse, ie mass * velocity

Rockets kick out lotsa mass, but at a relatively low velocity (~ 1000-4000 m/s)
Ion engines kick out little-itty-bitty ions, but at kick-ass speed (~15,000-100,000 m/s)

But all that velocity means kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2), and that means lotsa energy...

Effective thrust for a rocket is 10^3 to 10^7 N
Effective thrust for ion engines are 10^-3 to 10

That's not just a little less, it's a freakin' 6 orders of magnitude difference!

Ion engines will NEVER lift you off an rock. I don't care how many times we watch Trek...ain't a gonna happen.
Dang physics in the way again....
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and is widely regarded as a bad move." - Douglas Adams (1952-2001)

Offline prometheus

  • Hot and Spicy
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3610
Ahhhh Gentlemen.....

Use math. Math helps. Math is good, just don't say that on a first (or even second) date...
Lookie here: it's like conservation of momentum, eh?

Thrust is equivalent to the impulse, ie mass * velocity

Rockets kick out lotsa mass, but at a relatively low velocity (~ 1000-4000 m/s)
Ion engines kick out little-itty-bitty ions, but at kick-ass speed (~15,000-100,000 m/s)

But all that velocity means kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2), and that means lotsa energy...

Effective thrust for a rocket is 10^3 to 10^7 N
Effective thrust for ion engines are 10^-3 to 10

That's not just a little less, it's a freakin' 6 orders of magnitude difference!

Ion engines will NEVER lift you off an rock. I don't care how many times we watch Trek...ain't a gonna happen.
Dang physics in the way again....


I concur, but since we are never liable to run out of chemical rocket fuel, they don't have to...

Chemicals to achieve Earth (or whatever planet) Orbit Injection, and for the burn to break orbit, and then switch on the Ionic Drive... 


To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the Universe!

Offline Dracho

  • Global Moderator
  • Rear Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 18289
  • Gender: Male
A great deal of our deep space exploration will depend upon us building vehicle assembly facilities either in orbit, or low gravity lunar environments.   From such a setting Ion engines would be perfect for probes, but I suspect it will never pan out for manned flight.  Most likely you'llbe looking at some form of nuclear engine for manned flights.  The electromagnetic bubble as a solar sail has great potential.

http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/m2p2_winglee_010621.html
The worst enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan.  - Karl von Clausewitz