Topic: Article on "nasty" EULA terms.  (Read 1218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Article on "nasty" EULA terms.
« on: October 24, 2005, 07:43:37 pm »
Link to full article

Quote
Do not criticize this product publicly


Quote
Do not use this product with other vendors products


Quote
When your computer dies, it's not our problem


Quote
We'll make any changes to this agreement we like, and you've just agreed to them


Quote
We're watching you


Quote
Just because you can pirate with our product, it does not mean that we know you can


Quote
You're not getting a refund

Therefore, you agree to pay, and Company agrees to accept in compromise, for each chargeback you may issue or directly or indirectly cause to be issued against company, the amount of EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS ($8,000.00) to Company (or the party selling you this license), as liquidated damages and not as a penalty. You expressly confess, in the event of such a "chargeback", that such chargeback constitutes fraud and confess such fraud. You agree to pay all costs incurred by company or the seller of this license in collecting these amounts.


The first EULA I read was for a game designed for "hot seat" play.   The EULA stated that it was for the use of ONE  person on ONE computer which made "hot seat" play against the EULA.

EULAs should not be able to extend the rights of the copyright holder beyond copyright laws limits.  So long as EULAs can do that effectively copyright holders have the right to legislate arbitrary laws and the government must enforce it for them.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."