Topic: some MJ variant examples  (Read 6504 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Starforce2

  • Bridge Commander Ambassador
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2827
    • Nightsoft SFC File Dump
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2005, 09:40:45 pm »
...Just out of curiosity, why would you need the oberth nacelles? If anything it's just extra power (at least to the SFB mind.. that's WARP.) and they'd probably look funny anyway.

I meant instead of the connie nacelles, why would such a small ship need large expensive mainline nacelles?

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2005, 10:01:57 pm »
...Just out of curiosity, why would you need the oberth nacelles? If anything it's just extra power (at least to the SFB mind.. that's WARP.) and they'd probably look funny anyway.

I meant instead of the connie nacelles, why would such a small ship need large expensive mainline nacelles?

Suppose you could call it a fault in the design :P
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2005, 10:11:37 pm »
Command variant
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline ModelsPlease

  • Retired Model Junkie
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4665
  • Gender: Male
  • ModelsPlease
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2005, 10:27:40 pm »
It doesn't need a saucer, I agree. Maybe the oberth nacelles, I dunno I like it as an AUX. ship

ModelsPlease, resident "Model Junkie" recovering from a tragic crayon sharpener accident.

Offline Mr_Tricorder

  • 3D modeler /animator
  • Hot and Spicy
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1040
  • Gender: Male
  • Trekkie at Large
    • My myspace page
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2005, 10:31:58 pm »
That saucer looks like a squished safari hat.  :lol:

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2005, 10:42:11 pm »
That saucer looks like a squished safari hat.  :lol:
Yep :P

I was thinking of making an UFO with the command pod and 2 obert saucer halves :D
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Norsehound

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 578
  • Gender: Male
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2005, 11:12:21 pm »
...um....

*docking with the survey ship from FORBIDDEN PLANET!*

Why not extend the impulse deck back a ways and mount one of the oberth command pods there? Mount the other one where the current bridge is now... that's how I saw a possible surveyship/shuttle tender.

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #27 on: October 19, 2005, 11:25:59 pm »

Like I said, the obert saucer is too big to be put on it, horizontally. No I havent changed the scales of the parts at all, I quess the original excelsior/obert scales are off o_O
And oh yeah, ive tried the oberth saucer idea a couple of times now, it looks horrible any way I try to set it up :/
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Starforce2

  • Bridge Commander Ambassador
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2827
    • Nightsoft SFC File Dump
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #28 on: October 20, 2005, 05:53:11 am »
Command variant


that actualy looks cool. Perhaps something for the private sector or executive yacht or something...but it does work.

Offline Magnum357

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 641
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #29 on: October 20, 2005, 07:31:28 pm »
Hey Mackie, could you make a version with Warp Pylon lengths reduced by 25%?  I'm just curious how the engines would look with that slight modification.

As for Oberth Nacelles on it, aren't Oberth Nacelles suppose to be cheaper/less maintance but are less powerful then standard Warp engines?
"I sure am glad I like SFB!" - Magnum357 (me)

Offline Norsehound

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 578
  • Gender: Male
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2005, 09:28:30 pm »
If that were the case, why weren't constitutions fitted with them? I think different designer for a different market- science vessels aren't supposed to be huge warships. It's like a trawler compared to a battlecruiser in today's wet-navy. The Refit Constitution and the Miranda carry what I feel is the standard nacelle for combat-grade starfleet vessels.

And here's an idea: Mirror the excelsior hull and put it on the top of the current one.

Offline Magnum357

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 641
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2005, 09:48:29 pm »
I'm not exactly sure what you are driving at.  But if you want to compare it to our wet-navy we see today, I remember watching a TV show once that talked about the evolution of Ship propulsion in Commercial and Navy Warships.  What I thought was interesting was that most navel warships (with a few exceptions) are all based on Spine-turbine design which are expensive to maintain, but produce a lot of power and have less "man-power" maintance.  While most Auxialry ships in the Navy used for other things duties have simple old Hydrolic systems that require more maintance and have less speed, but can provide good power and easy maintance.

What I'm try to say is what is wrong with the idea of Oberth Warp Engines being a Simpler less expensive type?
"I sure am glad I like SFB!" - Magnum357 (me)

Offline Norsehound

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 578
  • Gender: Male
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2005, 11:51:12 pm »
Simpler, less expensive, less power, less demand, less stress.

The Grissom was blown up in one shot. It's engines couldn't provide power for the shields, for significant weapons, or anything of that sort. It's main purpose is to provide a ship with warp power and main power for sensors and instruments.

Comparatively, a system like the Consitituion Refit carries a system meant for combat. A ship like that needs to be that capable. The Oberth was never intended to be in any kind of combat situation, whereas ships like the Constitution are seen as front line warships and thus need more power, more resiliancy, and able to withstand combat stresses.

And the Excelsior was supposedly transwarp. Fail or no, the new engines are meant to power a (then) Battlecruiser/Dreadnought sized starship, which would fill that role if Starfleet went to war. This meant it should have the power to survive the beating from a D7 and hurt it enough to make it go away, stop moving, or cease to exist as one functional starship.

So adding the nacelles to this design means (in a SFB Point of view) adding auxilurary engines to increase total power output. Some mainline variants to this anyway- like the F5W with an additional frigate engine (of course, SFC doesn't reflect this).

Travesty, IMO, is when you replace the engines with oberth ones. They just aren't designed to carry the weight of a combat vessel. That's a good explaination why the Okinawa does not use Oberth engines- they aren't combat optimized.

And then there's size ratio. The Oberth is a small 'civilian' vessel with something like three phasers, not much else. This ship looks like the size of an Excelsior main hull and mounts a pair of constitution engines- a good choice, since it seems to be a stand-in cruiser. Sticking oberth nacelles on a big ship is like a shipyard giving a modern carrier oars to make it move. You need either a lot of them (oars and manpower), or bigger engines (No, no bigger oars, a bigger propultion system- ala turbines, propellers, etx.)

Offline Magnum357

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 641
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2005, 12:38:19 am »
It sounds like you are saying that Mackies design is suppose to stand up in front-line combat.  I thought he said this is basically a Multifunctional Auxilary Unit?  Maybe once in a while in Front line combat, but must of the time not.

I do agree that the Oberth engines are not designed for combat.
"I sure am glad I like SFB!" - Magnum357 (me)

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #34 on: October 21, 2005, 02:41:15 am »
Right, right.
Its an auxiliary vessel alright but I dont want to have it blown up in the first bloody shot and besides, the exploration variant already on its own needs larger warps...
And its a good auxiliary vessel at that too, its none of those backwater types made from the cheapest materials possible...
As you already can see, the ship can scout, explore, provide fast-attacks, provide space control (command) and can be used as an advanced science ship since it has a good power supply for the most extensive and power desiring epuiqment.
And once I get started again it can carry troops back from and to the frontlines and be a good field hospital with decent defenses, if thats required of its class.
Some of its missions are crucial for the success of larger scale operations even if its not battling the enemies on constant basis, theres no place for a power failure.

Hell, I was even thinking of doing a blockade runner variant with three warp engines and additional impulse engines.
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #35 on: November 01, 2005, 02:29:52 pm »
Alright, im trying to get back into modding the MJ class so if anyone knows and sorry if ive asked before, would anyone happen to know where I could find a retexed transport or a carrier pod? I remember someone once retexed my TOS carrier pod bash  ;D
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline ModelsPlease

  • Retired Model Junkie
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4665
  • Gender: Male
  • ModelsPlease
Re: some MJ variant examples
« Reply #36 on: November 02, 2005, 07:46:41 am »
Maybe Firesoul has one Mackie.

ModelsPlease, resident "Model Junkie" recovering from a tragic crayon sharpener accident.