Be sure to check out the Dynaverse.Net Repository, the most comprehensive SFC library around !! ftp.dynaverse.net
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Grand Master of Shadows NCC 37385 on October 19, 2005, 11:10:48 pmWithout a magnetic field, building up the atmosphere would be pointless because the solar wind would errode it. Many scientist believe that Mars once had a dense atmosphere, but that it lost most of its magnetic field as the planetary core cooled, and the atmosphere simply "blew away".This picture is incomplete... Venus doesn't have a magnetic field and it's atmosphere is much denser than ours, despite it being ravaged even more harshly by the solar wind...
Without a magnetic field, building up the atmosphere would be pointless because the solar wind would errode it. Many scientist believe that Mars once had a dense atmosphere, but that it lost most of its magnetic field as the planetary core cooled, and the atmosphere simply "blew away".
Unlike the Earth, Venus's ionosphere, not a magnetosphere deflects the solar wind flow However, as on the Earth, this deflection is accomplished with the formation of a bow shock, which heats and compresses the solar wind flow The shock is both closer to the planet and weaker than would be expected for an ideal gas dynamic interaction with a perfectly reflecting obstacle. The ionized flow of the magnetosheath can interact directly with the neutral atmosphere through charge exchange and photoionization. The former process removes momentum from the flow; both processes add mass to the solar wind, since the high altitude neutral atmosphere is mainly hot oxygen, not hydrogen. Finally, Venus, like Earth, has a magnetotail but not for the same reason. The mass loading of the flow in the magnetosheath slows the transport of magnetic flux tubes past the planet, while the ends of the tubes continue to travel rapidly in the solar wind. Thus the planet accretes interplanetary magnetic flux. This process is the dominant source for the magnetotail flux, not unipolar induction, although the latter process is present at least when the solar wind dynamic pressure is high. On the whole, the solar wind interaction with Venus is more comet-like than Earth-like.
Set off a nuke in the planet core???
That erosion took 16 *million* years.
Quote from: prometheus on October 19, 2005, 11:44:32 pmQuote from: Grand Master of Shadows NCC 37385 on October 19, 2005, 11:10:48 pmWithout a magnetic field, building up the atmosphere would be pointless because the solar wind would errode it. Many scientist believe that Mars once had a dense atmosphere, but that it lost most of its magnetic field as the planetary core cooled, and the atmosphere simply "blew away".This picture is incomplete... Venus doesn't have a magnetic field and it's atmosphere is much denser than ours, despite it being ravaged even more harshly by the solar wind...But Venus has protective properties that Mars doesnt.http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/russell/papers/interact_solwind/QuoteUnlike the Earth, Venus's ionosphere, not a magnetosphere deflects the solar wind flow However, as on the Earth, this deflection is accomplished with the formation of a bow shock, which heats and compresses the solar wind flow The shock is both closer to the planet and weaker than would be expected for an ideal gas dynamic interaction with a perfectly reflecting obstacle. The ionized flow of the magnetosheath can interact directly with the neutral atmosphere through charge exchange and photoionization. The former process removes momentum from the flow; both processes add mass to the solar wind, since the high altitude neutral atmosphere is mainly hot oxygen, not hydrogen. Finally, Venus, like Earth, has a magnetotail but not for the same reason. The mass loading of the flow in the magnetosheath slows the transport of magnetic flux tubes past the planet, while the ends of the tubes continue to travel rapidly in the solar wind. Thus the planet accretes interplanetary magnetic flux. This process is the dominant source for the magnetotail flux, not unipolar induction, although the latter process is present at least when the solar wind dynamic pressure is high. On the whole, the solar wind interaction with Venus is more comet-like than Earth-like.
We'd need a hell of a lot of material to increase Mars diameter...
Quote from: prometheus on October 20, 2005, 12:21:50 amWe'd need a hell of a lot of material to increase Mars diameter...we have the kuiper objects, asteroid belt and Oort cloud/trans-pluto objects.
even if the field blinked off instantly it would take 16 million years based upon gravity, random motion at the boundary layer and the collision probability. if the field lingered even weakening it would have taken longer.
1/ Move some asteroids to Mars - Sun #1 Lagrange point.2/ Build a power station / construction station there.3/ Using asteroids for raw materials build a super conducting web 4/ Super conducting web creates magnetic shield for planet.
1/ Move some asteroids to Mars geosynchronous orbit2/ Build a power station / construction station there.3/ Using asteroids for raw materials build a super conducting web circling the planet4/ Super conducting web creates magnetic shield for planet.
I meant it would take 16 million years for the oxygen to escape Mars' gravity field based on calculations provided by your friendly neighborhood DeathMerchant.
Quote from: Stormbringer on October 21, 2005, 09:54:48 pmI meant it would take 16 million years for the oxygen to escape Mars' gravity field based on calculations provided by your friendly neighborhood DeathMerchant.I was under the impression from previous sources (and postings) that part of that escape was driven by the particles in the solar wind that Earths magnetic field protects us from. I could provide a more "exotic" means of giving Mars a magnetic field by changing the core of Mars.