Topic: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does  (Read 9118 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
*Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« on: September 07, 2005, 12:44:31 pm »
Largest Asteroid Might Contain More Fresh Water than Earth
By Bjorn Carey
SPACE.com Staff Writer
posted: 07 September 2005
01:15 pm ET
 

The largest known asteroid could contain more fresh water than Earth and looks like our planet in other ways, according to a new study that further blurs the line between planets and large space rocks.

Astronomers took 267 images of asteroid Ceres using the Hubble Space Telescope. From these images and subsequent computer simulations, they suggest Ceres may have a rocky inner core and a thin, dusty outer crust.

A team led by Peter Thomas of Cornell University said today that Ceres is nearly spherical, which suggests that gravity controls its shape. Also, the asteroid's wobbly rotation indicates that material is not evenly distributed throughout the inside.

These and other new clues, including Ceres' low density, point to an interior loaded with frozen water, the astronomers said.

The results are detailed in the Sept. 8 issue of the journal Nature.

Big and round

Ceres has long been considered one of the tens of thousands of asteroids that make up the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. At 580 miles (930 km) in diameter – about the size of Texas – it's the largest asteroid in the belt, accounting for about 25 percent of the belt's total mass.

Astronomers had thought Ceres might never have been heated enough to create layers of material.

But computer models now suggest Ceres has a differentiated interior – dense material in the core and lighter stuff near the surface. Possible configurations include a mantle rich in water ice around a rocky core.

If this mantle is composed of at least 25 percent water, Ceres would have more fresh water than Earth, according to a statement released by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which operates Hubble for NASA and the European Space Agency.

"The most likely scenario from the knowledge we have on how other objects form, it probably has a rocky core and a mantle. That mantle is probably some watery, icy mix, with other dirt and constituents. That mantle could be as much as ¼ of the whole object," study coauthor Joel Parker of the Southwest Research Institute told SPACE.com. "Even though it's a small object compared to Earth, there could be a lot of water."

On Earth, fresh water makes up only a thin layer just a few miles deep in some places, less in others. The water layer proposed for Ceres, while smaller in circumference, is many miles thicker.

The total volume of water on Earth is about 1.4 billion cubic kilometers, around 41 million of which is fresh water. If Ceres' mantle accounts for 25 percent of the asteroid's mass, that would translate to an upper limit of 200 million cubic kilometers of water, Parker said.

Since all the nine "regular" planets have differentiated interiors, this new view of Ceres has some astronomers calling Ceres a "mini-planet," adding fuel to an ongoing debate over exactly what qualifies as a planet.

Embroyonic world

Other researchers recently announced the discovery of 2003 UB313, a round object in our solar system 1-1/2 times larger than Pluto and about three times further away from the Sun. But even an object of this size – at 2,100 miles in diameter roughly four times the size of Ceres – doesn't receive universal endorsement as being a planet.

One astronomer, Brian Marsden, who runs the Minor Planet Center where data on small bodies is collected, says that if Pluto is considered a planet, then any other round worlds should also be considered planets. Under this definition, which some other astronomers subscribe to, Ceres 2003 UB313 and a handful of other large objects would be named planets. The alternative, Marsden and others say, is to stop calling Pluto a planet. 

Another explanation is that Ceres is a sort of 'baby' planet – an underdeveloped version of Earth and other rocky planets. Looked at this way, Ceres appears as other fledgling planets might have looked more than 4 billion years ago.

The leading theory for planet formation holds that small rocks collided, stuck and gradually grew. Depending on location and orbit, a developing world may or may not have encountered enough raw material to become as large as the four traditional rocky planets.

"Ceres is an embryonic planet," said observation team member Lucy McFadden of the Department of Astronomy at the University of Maryland. "Gravitational perturbations from Jupiter billions of years ago prevented Ceres from accreting more material to become a full-fledged planet."

In 2015 scientists will get a close up look at Ceres when the NASA Dawn mission orbits the asteroid. A closer look should provide more clues about the asteroid's composition.


Offline E_Look

  • Grand High Scribe
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6446
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2005, 11:04:43 pm »
Does it have any magnetic field?

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2005, 01:44:22 am »
Does it have any magnetic field?

Don't know but i understand Mars has a negligible one. Mars is still a planet. The true definition of Planets is quite in dispute.

Offline E_Look

  • Grand High Scribe
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6446
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2005, 11:55:42 am »
Oh, I wasn't wondering about its classification, I was wondering what's in it!

If it does have a magnetic field the inner material is most likely not to be water.

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2005, 12:10:12 pm »
Not according to the scientists in that article:  "These and other new clues, including Ceres' low density, point to an interior loaded with frozen water, the astronomers said."  ;)

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2005, 03:40:13 pm »
Step 1/ Travel to Ceres (could send Robots)
Step 2/ Set up magnetic catapault
Step 3/ Lob snowballs at Mars using trajectories designed to move Ceries towards Mars as well.
(It wouldn't matter if a snowball took 5 or 6 long orbits to get there)
Step 4/ Continue terraforming Mars with other methods at the same time
Step 5/ Mine Ceres for other resources while digging up the snowballs.
Step 6/ Move to Mars.

Note: Snowballs would be of a size determined to burn up without hitting the ground.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline Dracho

  • Global Moderator
  • Rear Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 18289
  • Gender: Male
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2005, 11:54:16 pm »
7 Gravitational attraction causes impact. 
8 Mars breaks up
9 BIG meteor ends life in Sol System
The worst enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan.  - Karl von Clausewitz

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2005, 05:03:19 am »
7 Gravitational attraction causes impact. 
8 Mars breaks up
9 BIG meteor ends life in Sol System

Note to self:  Don't let Dracho near the navigation systems.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline prometheus

  • Hot and Spicy
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3610
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2005, 06:00:23 am »
Terraforming Mars?   I honestly can't see it...  apart from Russia, we can't even get our arses in gear to build a viable orbital Space Program, much less visit Mars and certainly not turn it into Earth 2...  It's time NASA received some serious funding...

On the point about water on Ceres, beyond about 4 times further away from the Sun than Earth, water will not evaporate off into Space (Hence the formation of the ice giants), so it is possible there could be ice on this asteroid, since it is (I beleive) about 4 a.m.u. from the Sun...


To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the Universe!

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13067
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2005, 06:40:23 am »
Terraforming Mars?   I honestly can't see it...  apart from Russia, we can't even get our arses in gear to build a viable orbital Space Program, much less visit Mars and certainly not turn it into Earth 2... 

Today no.  Tomorrow?  But tomorrow won't come if people are not working towards it.  No one backed Goddard, the Germans copied him and had the V1 and V2 while the allies were going WTF?  Goddard wanted to build a lunar probe (pre WWII) but was told it was "impossible".  It became possible once Russia decided to take the high ground and orbited sputnik.  National prestige made the U.S. target doing better than "the Commies".

It's time NASA received some serious funding...

Actually I would like to see NASA told that they are a space research organization and have them trimmed back.  No commercial launches.  Operations beyond GEO only.  At this point NASA is too large and has too much inertia.  It also has in the past helped influence laws being passed to keep commercial rocket companies out of business.  Losing a shuttle then another has weakened their influence which has allowed the commercial developments that are occurring.   One of those laws was so poorly crafted that hobbiests could not legally launch toy rockets without governmental permissions.  That was changed quickly when a model rocket engine company included the forms with each engine and drowned them in paperwork.  :)  NASA influence helped kill a number of startups in the 1980s.  They couldn't use NASA or military launch facilities and couldn't build their own. 

Get the LEO-GEO stuff into commercial hands.  Move the space station into its own operation which should be told - replace the shuttle.  There are at least 1/2 a dozen good candidates.   

Why have activities in space heated up?  Two reasons in my opinion.  1/ The Chinese putting a man in orbit renews competition as many Americans fear China.  2/ The X-Prize gave an immediate way to make back some of your money by winning the prize even if your project became a commercial failure.

If these commercial ventures result in affordable orbital trips (notice I say trips not missions) then deep space becomes much easier too.  The first step is the big one.

NASA set the stage now they need to step aside and let the actors put on the play.  Later when NASA has blazed the path to Mars, the Moon and the asteroids it will be once more time to tell them look further out, that is where you belong.
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline E_Look

  • Grand High Scribe
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6446
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2005, 10:54:17 am »
7 Gravitational attraction causes impact. 
8 Mars breaks up
9 BIG meteor ends life in Sol System

Note to self:  Don't let Dracho near the navigation systems.

Install SFC on his navigational computer, tell him it's a real space traffic controller app, and let him slam as many ships into asteroids as he pleases!  Get the modelers to help you get 21st century looking ships in it first.  And hide the weapons controls.

Offline Dracho

  • Global Moderator
  • Rear Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 18289
  • Gender: Male
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2005, 12:06:16 pm »
7 Gravitational attraction causes impact. 
8 Mars breaks up
9 BIG meteor ends life in Sol System

Note to self:  Don't let Dracho near the navigation systems.

"Hey Ya'll, Somebody Hold My beer and watch this!"
The worst enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan.  - Karl von Clausewitz

Offline FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC

  • Empress of the Empire
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2543
  • Gender: Female
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2005, 11:14:37 am »
Does it have any magnetic field?

Highly unlikely. Planetary megnaetic fields are produced by circulation and movement of molten iron in the core of a planet which acts like a giant magnetic dynamo. Mars is no longer geologically active and its molten core has cooled, thus it has no longer has a significant magnetic field.
Captain FPF-TraceyG, Federation Protection Fleet


SFC2.net Admin member
SFC3.net Admin member
Voting member of the DGA
Member of XenoCorp, Squadron Commodore

Offline E_Look

  • Grand High Scribe
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6446
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2005, 07:53:56 pm »
That's what I was trying to get at, since it was mentioned that there may be much water in the interior.

However, no one knows what electrostatic and hence magnetic effects may occur due to the aggregate action of small effects from all the component particles of a large body of even dielectric material, which does have some polarizability, as with water.

Does it have any magnetic field?

Highly unlikely. Planetary megnaetic fields are produced by circulation and movement of molten iron in the core of a planet which acts like a giant magnetic dynamo. Mars is no longer geologically active and its molten core has cooled, thus it has no longer has a significant magnetic field.

Offline FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC

  • Empress of the Empire
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2543
  • Gender: Female
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2005, 09:34:47 pm »
That's what I was trying to get at, since it was mentioned that there may be much water in the interior.

However, no one knows what electrostatic and hence magnetic effects may occur due to the aggregate action of small effects from all the component particles of a large body of even dielectric material, which does have some polarizability, as with water.

Does it have any magnetic field?

Highly unlikely. Planetary megnaetic fields are produced by circulation and movement of molten iron in the core of a planet which acts like a giant magnetic dynamo. Mars is no longer geologically active and its molten core has cooled, thus it has no longer has a significant magnetic field.

Well, a good well known example of such an object, is our very own Moon. While it too is no longer geologically active and creates no magnetic field of its own, it does have localised magnetic fields thought to be produced by iron compounds that have been deposited in the Moon's crust over time by collisions with meterors. If Ceres contains iron, then its possible that it may have a very weak local magnetic field in some areas, not unlike finding a magnet buried in the ground.
Captain FPF-TraceyG, Federation Protection Fleet


SFC2.net Admin member
SFC3.net Admin member
Voting member of the DGA
Member of XenoCorp, Squadron Commodore

Offline E_Look

  • Grand High Scribe
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6446
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #15 on: September 15, 2005, 11:16:51 pm »
That really isn't very much iron.  I meant LOTS of water under Ceres' surface.

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2005, 08:22:30 pm »
Step 1/ Travel to Ceres (could send Robots)
Step 2/ Set up magnetic catapault
Step 3/ Lob snowballs at Mars using trajectories designed to move Ceries towards Mars as well.
(It wouldn't matter if a snowball took 5 or 6 long orbits to get there)
Step 4/ Continue terraforming Mars with other methods at the same time
Step 5/ Mine Ceres for other resources while digging up the snowballs.
Step 6/ Move to Mars.

Note: Snowballs would be of a size determined to burn up without hitting the ground.

 Ya beat me to it! :) My first thoughts exactly. Or tow it into orbit around the moon and use it to colonise it first.

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2005, 09:23:59 pm »
The moon has enough water in the shadow of polar craters to fill the great lakes many times over. it is unnecessary to bring water from anywhere to the moon. same thing for Mars except ther is even more water. the only reasons to bring Ceres there is to populate the atmosphere with more oxygen and to use the other mass to increase the gravity. Ceres would otherwise be better off where it is to act as a way station to the outer solar system and for fueling mining operations in the belt. Of course i favor terraforming mars to include adding mass to increase the gravity or using the mass of asteroids, kuiper and Oort objects to construct a planet from scratch in the life zone of the sun. bombarding Mars with additional mass is problematic on ethical and scientific grounds by reason of anihilating any trace of exobiology if it exists and obliterating the geological record. building a planet from scratch though more difficult has none of those drawbacks.

Offline FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC

  • Empress of the Empire
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2543
  • Gender: Female
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2005, 09:46:51 pm »
All Mars needs really is a little more greenhouse effect. Once the temperature rises high enough (and it doesnt need to go up by much) to get liquid water back on the surface (and hence rain bearing clouds in the atmosphere), the greenhouse effect will start to increase unlocking more and more frozen water in the surface. The atmosphere will thicken raising atmospheric pressure, and therefore with it the temperature. A lot of carbon dioxide is also likely to sublime to gas as well, further increasing the greenhouse effect. The real task will be getting oxygen back into the atmosphere which could be done longterm by introducing an ecosystem that can survive in the Martian modified environment.
Captain FPF-TraceyG, Federation Protection Fleet


SFC2.net Admin member
SFC3.net Admin member
Voting member of the DGA
Member of XenoCorp, Squadron Commodore

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
Re: *Planet* Ceres likely to have more fresh water than earth does
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2005, 10:09:11 pm »
All Mars needs really is a little more greenhouse effect. Once the temperature rises high enough (and it doesnt need to go up by much) to get liquid water back on the surface (and hence rain bearing clouds in the atmosphere), the greenhouse effect will start to increase unlocking more and more frozen water in the surface. The atmosphere will thicken raising atmospheric pressure, and therefore with it the temperature. A lot of carbon dioxide is also likely to sublime to gas as well, further increasing the greenhouse effect. The real task will be getting oxygen back into the atmosphere which could be done longterm by introducing an ecosystem that can survive in the Martian modified environment.
Someone (I beleive it was death merchant) calculated it would take 16 million years for the atmospheric oxygen to escape the boundary of the gravity well due to Mars' weak gravity and radiation pressure let in due to mars' weak magnetic field. not enough is trapped in ice or oxidation despite mars' red color. it would need tremendous augmentation from cometary ice from the Oort cloud. Howevery 16 million years is many times the current life span of human history. It would suffice.