Topic: R-NHK vs F-CB  (Read 25772 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Julin Eurthyr

  • Veltrassi Ambassador at Large
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1057
  • Gender: Male
  • Back in Exile due to Win 7 - ISC RM/Strat Com.
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #60 on: September 07, 2005, 08:17:53 pm »


While we're on this discussion, could someone remind me what the status of the I-CCZ is again?  Remember, it's a "measily" command cruiser, carrying a whopping 1 extra HW and 4 more power than the CA version of the same hull... ;)

You really need to get a clue.

Once again, I am reminded of exactly why I don't post on the forum as much as I should...

Here I am, making the case that the R-NHK is a BCH-classed ship, and decide that, in my usual half-sarcastic / half-humouros self, to post a tounge-in-cheek remark that would illustrate the point, in that the I-CCZ is another CA-hulled BCH-classed ship.

Am I the only one that sees the smiley face I put at the end of my CCZ remark, and remembers that smileys are supposed to denote humor?

I thank you all for the generous reminder.

AKA: Koloth Kinshaya - Lord of the House Kinshaya in the Klingon Empire
S'Leth - Romulan Admiral
Some anonymous strongman in Prime Industries

Offline Hexx

  • Sexy Shoeless Lyran God Of War
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6058
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #61 on: September 07, 2005, 09:02:42 pm »
Julin ~ they're stupid, one has to remember (..of course you're not me so you're kinda intellectually down there as well but..)

Anyways- I honestly don't find *that* big a difference amongst the fast cruisers, they're cheesy (light) yes, but (imho) they
balance relatively well against each other.
The HDW's (again imo) are way out of balance, some are very good and some are completely useless. Although I don;t like them- I wouldn't
have an issue with them if they were somewhat balanced against each other.
Courageously Protesting "Lyran Pelt Day"

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #62 on: September 07, 2005, 09:15:53 pm »
Quote from: The Holy book of SFB, Module R4, P6, R4.72:
valid.  This ship is considered to be a heavy battlecruiser.
Designed by Jeff Smith.
This ship is a "Heavy Hawk;" see (R4.N3).
SSD and counter are in Module R4.


I think I smell t00l's hemorrhoids burning.  :P

Thanks Julin.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #63 on: September 07, 2005, 11:03:20 pm »


While we're on this discussion, could someone remind me what the status of the I-CCZ is again?  Remember, it's a "measily" command cruiser, carrying a whopping 1 extra HW and 4 more power than the CA version of the same hull... ;)

You really need to get a clue.

Once again, I am reminded of exactly why I don't post on the forum as much as I should...

Here I am, making the case that the R-NHK is a BCH-classed ship, and decide that, in my usual half-sarcastic / half-humouros self, to post a tounge-in-cheek remark that would illustrate the point, in that the I-CCZ is another CA-hulled BCH-classed ship.

Am I the only one that sees the smiley face I put at the end of my CCZ remark, and remembers that smileys are supposed to denote humor?

I thank you all for the generous reminder.

Glad I can be of service  ;D
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #64 on: September 07, 2005, 11:06:12 pm »
Quote from: The Holy book of SFB, Module R4, P6, R4.72:
valid.  This ship is considered to be a heavy battlecruiser.
Designed by Jeff Smith.
This ship is a "Heavy Hawk;" see (R4.N3).
SSD and counter are in Module R4.


I think I smell t00l's hemorrhoids burning.  :P

Thanks Julin.

Where does "Heavy Hawk" mean BCH?
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #65 on: September 07, 2005, 11:11:51 pm »
While I kinda like the Fast Cruisers(  ::) ) the Heavy War Destroyers are a travesty.



While I kinda like the Heavy War destroyers, the fast cruisers are a travesty  :P

Depends on what race you fly Hexx  ;)

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #66 on: September 07, 2005, 11:13:41 pm »


Anyways- I honestly don't find *that* big a difference amongst the fast cruisers, they're cheesy (light) yes, but (imho) they
balance relatively well against each other.


LMAO

Talk about something you know Hexx, like writing a proper last will and testament before entering into PvP

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #67 on: September 07, 2005, 11:23:50 pm »
Quote from: The Holy book of SFB, Module R4, P6, R4.72:
valid.  This ship is considered to be a heavy battlecruiser.
Designed by Jeff Smith.
This ship is a "Heavy Hawk;" see (R4.N3).
SSD and counter are in Module R4.


I think I smell t00l's hemorrhoids burning.  :P

Thanks Julin.

Where does "Heavy Hawk" mean BCH?


Are you blind? Here I'll make the important part bigger so even you can see it.


This ship is considered to be a heavy battlecruiser.

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #68 on: September 07, 2005, 11:35:11 pm »
Quote from: The Holy book of SFB, Module R4, P6, R4.72:
valid.  This ship is considered to be a heavy battlecruiser.
Designed by Jeff Smith.
This ship is a "Heavy Hawk;" see (R4.N3).
SSD and counter are in Module R4.


I think I smell t00l's hemorrhoids burning.  :P

Thanks Julin.

Where does "Heavy Hawk" mean BCH?


Are you blind? Here I'll make the important part bigger so even you can see it.


This ship is considered to be a heavy battlecruiser.

LMAO +1 Karma to Corbo for making an intoxicated Kzin giggle, can you do that with an SFC is NOT SFB statement  ;)

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #69 on: September 08, 2005, 10:36:24 am »
So it's a Command cruiser, right?    ;D
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Hexx

  • Sexy Shoeless Lyran God Of War
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6058
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #70 on: September 08, 2005, 10:42:18 am »
So it's a Command cruiser, right?    ;D

You're such a dumbass

HEAVY HAWK

It'd be a Heavy Command Cruiser.

BTW was Corbo just being charming or are the "Heavy Hawks" actually considered BCH's?
I always though Heavy Hawk was just a designator for a ship bigger than a Firehawk, smaller than a DN.
(Course I don't have the module so..)

« Last Edit: September 08, 2005, 11:53:22 am by Hexx »
Courageously Protesting "Lyran Pelt Day"

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #71 on: September 08, 2005, 10:46:20 am »
So it's a Command cruiser, right?    ;D

You're such a dumbass

HEAVY HAWK

It'd be a Heavy Command Cruiser.


(R4.N3) Add "SunHawk (R4.82)" and "RegalHawk (R4.90)" to the Heavy Hawk list.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #72 on: September 08, 2005, 12:17:10 pm »

So it's a Command cruiser, right?    ;D
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #73 on: September 08, 2005, 03:30:42 pm »
Boy, the contrition around here is just amazing.  ::)

IMO it is a CCH, however, since in SFB the KCR is conjectural and the KHK is limited by number and Shock rules, I think they consider them BCH's for purposes of build economics and command functions where applicable.

BTW, apology accepted.  :P

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #74 on: September 08, 2005, 03:44:21 pm »
Boy, the contrition around here is just amazing.  ::)

IMO it is a CCH, however, since in SFB the KCR is conjectural and the KHK is limited by number and Shock rules, I think they consider them BCH's for purposes of build economics and command functions where applicable.

BTW, apology accepted.  :P

It does cost 10 EP to build, same as a C7 or a BCF.   Then again a CC costs 9 and a "normal" CA cost 8.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FA Frey XC

  • Site Owner
  • Administrator
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 5695
  • Gender: Male
    • XenoCorp.Net
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #75 on: September 08, 2005, 04:50:47 pm »
Corbo, while being a real fokker sometimes you are still a damned funny fokker.[/size][/color]

<snicker>

 :popcorn:
Vice President of Technology,
Dynaverse Gaming Association
Owner, CEO XenoCorp Inc.


Offline Seanner

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #76 on: September 08, 2005, 05:00:31 pm »
What time shall we "dance" tonight?  I recommend between 10-12, but you have a say as well.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #77 on: September 08, 2005, 05:03:00 pm »
What time shall we "dance" tonight?  I recommend between 10-12, but you have a say as well.

10 sounds good, I should have my PC fixed by then.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Seanner

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #78 on: September 08, 2005, 05:58:59 pm »
Wooord up.

Offline Julin Eurthyr

  • Veltrassi Ambassador at Large
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1057
  • Gender: Male
  • Back in Exile due to Win 7 - ISC RM/Strat Com.
Re: R-NHK vs F-CB
« Reply #79 on: September 08, 2005, 06:05:19 pm »

So it's a Command cruiser, right?    ;D


Could I recommend you get a clue there yourself...  :D

AKA: Koloth Kinshaya - Lord of the House Kinshaya in the Klingon Empire
S'Leth - Romulan Admiral
Some anonymous strongman in Prime Industries