Topic: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.  (Read 12756 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FPF-Tobin Dax

  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2719
  • Gender: Male
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #60 on: August 29, 2005, 06:04:54 pm »
which sfc edition had the guarding a princess ship on route to a planet? Could that be re-worked into the colony mission.? Make it a colony ship being escorted when enemies attack and you must get the ship through to the planet etc.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2005, 03:59:47 am by FPF-TobinDax »
Suspected leader of Prime Industries, #1 Pirate Cartel

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #61 on: August 29, 2005, 09:09:44 pm »
Don't waste your breath Julin. Most people only like cheese on one side of their cracker.

Yeah, sorry that our cheese was too bitter for you to swallow Corb.

I'd comment, but that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Well you seemed to be making a backhanded comment about the PBR finals, but if I'm wrong then I'll take it back.


No I was making a generalization about how people seem to rally against other races/teams uberness while ignoring the stinky limburger in their own 'fridge. The finals were what they were. I don't know about the other guys, but at that point I couldn't have cared less. Participating in the PBR League was the single least enjoyable time I ever had playing this game. My mistake and I'll never do it again.

762_XC

  • Guest
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #62 on: August 29, 2005, 09:16:29 pm »
Well since your nose seems to have been in my fridge, maybe you'll tell me what stinks. I'm sure I could use the enlightenment.

Offline Corbomite

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2939
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #63 on: August 29, 2005, 09:19:28 pm »
Well since your nose seems to have been in my fridge, maybe you'll tell me what stinks. I'm sure I could use the enlightenment.


You're a Hydran and you have ask what stinks?  :P

762_XC

  • Guest
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #64 on: August 29, 2005, 09:23:36 pm »
Yep.

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #65 on: August 30, 2005, 02:04:59 am »
Dragging it (sorta) back on topic

Why not have the penalty box apply to any & all VC ships? You lose one you can't fly another for 12 hrs.

I'd just hate to have certain pilots (who shall remain nameless) smash a BB,then a CVA,Then a DN,Then a BCV into planets over a 12hr period.


Prolly a good idea.

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #66 on: August 30, 2005, 02:15:41 am »
Dragging it (sorta) back on topic

Why not have the penalty box apply to any & all VC ships? You lose one you can't fly another for 12 hrs.

I'd just hate to have certain pilots (who shall remain nameless) smash a BB,then a CVA,Then a DN,Then a BCV into planets over a 12hr period.


Prolly a good idea.

Might want to qualify that idea, so that if noone else has any VC ship on for that side that pilot would have the option of taking one back out.  I just see situations where a few defenders are trying to hold off alot of attackers.  I don't think we should punish those lacking numbers too much.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: Weigh in: New server features. Post your thoughts.
« Reply #67 on: August 30, 2005, 03:51:25 pm »
Dragging it (sorta) back on topic

Why not have the penalty box apply to any & all VC ships? You lose one you can't fly another for 12 hrs.

I'd just hate to have certain pilots (who shall remain nameless) smash a BB,then a CVA,Then a DN,Then a BCV into planets over a 12hr period.


Prolly a good idea.

Might want to qualify that idea, so that if noone else has any VC ship on for that side that pilot would have the option of taking one back out.  I just see situations where a few defenders are trying to hold off alot of attackers.  I don't think we should punish those lacking numbers too much.

Chuut's right, we don't want p00p to snowball too much.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .