Topic: "Advanced" antimatter engine design on space.com  (Read 1408 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
"Advanced" antimatter engine design on space.com
« on: September 05, 2004, 06:32:44 pm »
Though not as grand as the early ones like the daedalus, etc... http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/antimatter_sail_021029.html

My question about this issuperficially similar to trek technology. The soviets developed MHD propulsion systems for ships and submarines towards the end of thier existance. With a MHD design it is possible to extract motive force in a self contained system. If a plasma MHD system were used to propel a spaceship the plasma could electromagnetically react against coils in an engine and generate not only thrust but capture power to run ships systems such as regenerating fuelcells, air scrubbers and so forth. Now this is close to what the trekkies  technobabble has for the warp system of the ships in trek. although this does not really touch on producing FTL travel, I'm wondering why the proposed designs for antimatter ships never take advantage of MHD reactions and induced currents captured by coils in thier designs?


Offline S'Raek

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3665
  • Gender: Male
Re: "Advanced" antimatter engine design on space.com
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2004, 03:09:18 am »
Thanks for posting the article, Storm, another good read.  If I had my millions this is the kind of thing that I would donate money to try and help move things along.  It may or may not work, but I think it would be worth the effort.

Veritas vos Liberabit -- Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus, et Fidelis

Offline Sirgod

  • Whooot Master Cattle Baron
  • Global Moderator
  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 27844
  • Gender: Male
Re: "Advanced" antimatter engine design on space.com
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2004, 04:59:16 pm »
Ramp Up Production Indeed. Sorry I missed this one Storm.

Stephen
"You cannot exaggerate about the Marines. They are convinced to the point of arrogance, that they are the most ferocious fighters on earth - and the amusing thing about it is that they are."- Father Kevin Keaney, Chaplain, Korean War

Offline Stormbringer

  • Global Moderator
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1984
  • Gender: Male
Re: "Advanced" antimatter engine design on space.com
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2005, 03:10:36 am »
First measurements of Earth's core radioactivity
27 July 2005
NewScientist.com news service
Celeste Biever
EARTH'S natural radioactivity has been measured for the first time. The measurement will help geologists find out to what extent nuclear decay is responsible for the immense quantity of heat generated by Earth.

Our planet's heat output drives the convection currents that churn liquid iron in the outer core, giving rise to Earth's magnetic field. Just where this heat comes from is a big question. Measurements of the temperature gradients across rocks in mines and boreholes have led geologists to estimate that the planet is internally generating between 30 and 44 terawatts of heat.

Some of this heat comes from the decay of radioactive elements. Based on studies of primitive meteorites known as carbonaceous chondrites, geologists have estimated Earth's uranium and thorium content and calculated that about 19 terawatts can be attributed to radioactivity. But until now there has been nothing definitive about exactly how much uranium there is in the planet, says geologist Bill McDonough of the University of Maryland in College Park. "There are fundamental uncertainties."

There is one way to lessen this uncertainty, and that is to look for antineutrinos. These particles are the antimatter equivalent of the uncharged, almost massless particles called neutrinos and are released when uranium and thorium decay to form lead. If antineutrinos are being created deep within the planet they should be detectable, because they can pass through almost all matter.

Now, the KamLAND antineutrino detector in Kamioka, Japan, has counted such antineutrinos. An international team of scientists analysed the data and found about 16.2 million antineutrinos per square centimetre per second streaming out from Earth's core. They calculate that the nuclear reactions creating these particles could be generating as much as 60 terawatts, but are most likely putting out about 24 terawatts (Nature, vol 436, p 499). "We have made the first measurements of the radioactivity of the whole of Earth," says John Learned, who heads the KamLAND group at the University of Hawaii in Manoa. The KamLAND group's finding is like unwrapping a birthday present, says McDonough.

With time, as more antineutrinos are detected, KamLAND may be able to determine once and for all whether radioactivity is entirely responsible for heating Earth or whether other sources, such as the crystallisation of liquid iron and nickel in the outer core, also play a significant role. "[Detecting anti-neutrinos] is the way of the future in terms of hard numbers about the system," says McDonough.

“The number of antineutrinos show that nuclear reactions are probably generating about 24 terawatts of the Earth's heat”Antineutrinos could also reveal the radioactive composition of the crust and mantle, which will give geologists clues as to when and how they formed. But to do that, they will have to be able to pin down exactly where the antineutrinos are coming from, and this will require a whole network of detectors. "We are heading towards doing neutrino tomography of the whole Earth," says Learned. "This is just the first step."