hmmm this is a post from the outside looking in as i can't even play on dyna anymore due to the USAFA firewall... arg (wish there wasn't there)
To me, as i've just read all 3 pages, you just had someone propose an idea and one that the author even said was incomplete and even flawed but at least was trying to get the gears turning up there. The first reply i think it was its essentially told as stupid and that the current rule is fine as it is. People, there is no such thing as a perfect rule. Even if it works that does not mean it shouldn't be improved. This philosphy of if it works don't fix it is completely idotic. To me it looked quite clear that the whole purpose of this post was to get you all to think, but it appears some of you are really close minded and are to set in your ways to even consider this idea or even take a close look at the current rule and attempt to fix the flaws yourself.
I'm really only making this post because some of the people who replied are really making themselve look like arses and really close minded. I personally don't have you alls expierence but that doesn't mean that my opinion on you all reaction to this post is not valid. I personally think that any person who felt this idea was completly idotic really should take a close look at themselves, realize that they are being close minded (or just confirm its idotic) and then improve upon it or propose your own. Saying that what you have now is good and even w/ its flaws needs no change is just being ignorant of the importance of change.
ok that my rant, you may now ignore this and go back to your current discussions...