Topic: ATTN: AoTK II RMs.

[Hexx]

I was never RM, I just tend to handle things with anyone flying Lyran
(ie provide reasons why they can't have the cap ship)

Chuut's one of the few people silly enough to believe in general democracy- I'll get the guys in the
forums to change his mind.
(Sides Kreug should vote for the Disengagement anyway)
But nicer if it's unanimous.

 so what do I know anyway.

Apparently not enough to go to the Kitty forum and place your arguments there like Chuut asked..
<sigh>

maybe if they only sold this game to intelligent people it would have worked out better... of course with no US sales support
might have dropped a bit sooner..

[el-Karnak]

I was never RM, I just tend to handle things with anyone flying Lyran
(ie provide reasons why they can't have the cap ship)

Chuut's one of the few people silly enough to believe in general democracy- I'll get the guys in the
forums to change his mind.
(Sides Kreug should vote for the Disengagement anyway)
But nicer if it's unanimous.

 so what do I know anyway.

Apparently not enough to go to the Kitty forum and place your arguments there like Chuut asked..
<sigh>

maybe if they only sold this game to intelligent people it would have worked out better... of course with no US sales support
might have dropped a bit sooner..

Since, only Kzin players nominated Chuut to be Kitty RM in this thread:

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163358149.0.html

I don't have much reason to recognize him as RM for the ISC. Get some nominations from Lyran and ISC players too, next time. No ISC leader in their right mind would argue against the dis-engagement rule. Obviously, by actions taken, Kitty RM means exactly that: RM for the Kzin; otherwise, more consideration would have been made towards at least the concerns of the frog players before issuing blanket against the dis-engagement rule statements.

maybe if they only sold this game to intelligent people it would have worked out better... of course with no US sales support
might have dropped a bit sooner..

Are you making a personal attack? If so, then this post is going to a Forum Admin.

[Kroma BaSyl]

I was never RM, I just tend to handle things with anyone flying Lyran
(ie provide reasons why they can't have the cap ship)

Chuut's one of the few people silly enough to believe in general democracy- I'll get the guys in the
forums to change his mind.
(Sides Kreug should vote for the Disengagement anyway)
But nicer if it's unanimous.

 so what do I know anyway.

Apparently not enough to go to the Kitty forum and place your arguments there like Chuut asked..
<sigh>

maybe if they only sold this game to intelligent people it would have worked out better... of course with no US sales support
might have dropped a bit sooner..

He doesn't have access to that forum silly. Besides rehashing the hexflipping "sockfoot" doctrine isn't going to get us anywhere.

[el-Karnak]

maybe if they only sold this game to intelligent people it would have worked out better... of course with no US sales support
might have dropped a bit sooner..

Forum Rules:

2. Messages should always maintain a respectful, civil tone towards one another. Name-calling,
personal attacks, baiting of others, and abuse is not allowed.

Your SIR, owe an apology. 

[Hexx]

Technically it's only a personal attack if you're a US citizen

As for the RM if you're actually serious about 'No ISC input" then an ISC pilot
shoulda have volunteered to RM, Chuut and Green were "elected" as Rms by being the only people
who would accept the job.

Und again- Chuut said (and I paraphrase as Im to lazy to look it up)
"If the Kitty players want the disengagement rule then post they want it in the kitty forums"
So some of us have- maybe if you posted there as well Chuut would say "The majority wants it, Ill vote for it"

[el-Karnak]

Technically it's only a personal attack if you're a US citizen

Right.... 


2. Messages should always maintain a respectful, civil tone towards one another. Name-calling,
personal attacks, baiting of others, and abuse is not allowed.

I don't appreciate people calling me stupid. If you can't apologize thenn STFU.

[Kroma BaSyl]

maybe if they only sold this game to intelligent people it would have worked out better... of course with no US sales support
might have dropped a bit sooner..

Forum Rules:

2. Messages should always maintain a respectful, civil tone towards one another. Name-calling,
personal attacks, baiting of others, and abuse is not allowed.

Your SIR, owe an apology. 

STFU!!! LOL. <snicker>

[Kroma BaSyl]

Technically it's only a personal attack if you're a US citizen

Right.... 


2. Messages should always maintain a respectful, civil tone towards one another. Name-calling,
personal attacks, baiting of others, and abuse is not allowed.

I don't appreciate people calling me stupid. If you can't apologize thenn STFU.

He is just compensating for his diminuative size, and the fact that I'm prettier than him.

[Hexx]

Since, only Kzin players nominated Chuut to be Kitty RM in this thread:

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163358149.0.html

I don't have much reason to recognize him as RM for the ISC. Get some nominations from Lyran and ISC players too, next time. No ISC leader in their right mind would argue against the dis-engagement rule. Obviously, by actions taken, Kitty RM means exactly that: RM for the Kzin; otherwise, more consideration would have been made towards at least the concerns of the frog players before issuing blanket against the dis-engagement rule statements.

Now how could i possibly consider you stupid for making a fine post like that about Chuut (who did essentially volunteer for the position)
While accusing me of being in violation of policy by being unrespectful and civil?

I'm sure the points about "No ISC RM in there right mind"
and "Kitty RM ..RM for Kzin only"
is your way of being very respectful and civil towards him for the job he volunteered for.

[Kroma BaSyl]

Hexx, it is best to just skip right over some people's posts. Like we do with most of yours.

PS, Karnak take your meds.

[Hexx]

Please
each of my posts is a beautifully crafted work of art that apply on so many levels

People play this game just to read my posts


And nobody's prettier than I am...

[SkyFlyer]

Please
each of my posts is a beautifully crafted work of art that apply on so many levels

People play this game just to read my posts


And nobody's prettier than I am...

OH NO!!!!! I'M TRAPPED IN THE MIRROR UNIVERSE!

[FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC]

What about using Shipping Lane hexes for Line of Supply?

<runs away very quickly>

[Dizzy]

You know... that ugly ED convoy raid mission that drew up to 2 enemies and never gave you a wing..., well couldnt we have slots for 2 players on each side? I'd love to see some convoy raids. And what terrain types would there be for that, and have we ever seen them b4?

Whatever happened to your convoy raid, Tracey? You were hard at work on one and had a huge input thread on it a while back iirc.

[FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC]

You know... that ugly ED convoy raid mission that drew up to 2 enemies and never gave you a wing..., well couldnt we have slots for 2 players on each side? I'd love to see some convoy raids. And what terrain types would there be for that, and have we ever seen them b4?

Whatever happened to your convoy raid, Tracey? You were hard at work on one and had a huge input thread on it a while back iirc.

The Convoy Raid and Escort missions I did before doing the Patrols. Since then, the patrols have been tested to a far greater degree and had numerous bug fixes and improvements done to them. The Convoy missions need all the same stuff done to them as the Patrols, but alas there probably isnt time for them before AOTK starts. Basically these Patrol missions will become a "template" for writing future scripts and I've written them with modularity in mind (ie. they can be turned into other types of missions very quickly). Getting the Patrols bug free and with as many enhancements as possible has therefore taken priority, but the work will pay off later.

[Dizzy]

You're a rich precious gem.

[Braxton_RIP]

Well, at least the Alliance guys arn't bickering yet.... 

[GDA-Agave]

Well, at least the Alliance guys arn't bickering yet.... 

Well........now that you mention it.   

[Green]

I was an Air Force guy, so I know a lot about the whole fight or flight thing.  If I am in my fighter over, say Iraq ...

You were in the Air Force and have a PhD in physics ... you rock.  Did you fly fighters?

I thought about joining the Air Force, never thought about getting a PhD in physics though..to much academia for me.

[KBFLordKrueg]

You need to read the rules page and provide input PRONTO.

You may post your input or PM me.

And here, let me, help you, help me, help you. 

   Please address the following:


1)  Disengagement Rule     Yes or No.

2)  Line of Supply Rules      What do you want.

3) Other thoughts.

I'll post...Sorry, just getting a chance to sit down and read the forums....
IMO...
1) I believe in the disengagement rule. I'm disappointed you took away the part about a capitol ship being banned if transferred to another player. I believe there MAYBE should be some exceptions for vastly unbalanced (like 1 CL vs DN and a BCH) ones, but, I can live with the disengagement rule without those exceptions.
I strongly agree with no disengagement for deepstrikers, but disagree with the part "   If you are in a hex that is completely surrounded by NEUTRAL and/or enemy hexes then you cannot disengage."
Especially considering there seems to be no mandatory missions in neutral space. I think no disengagement of surrounded by ENEMY hexes is fine. 
2) LOS rules: This is more complacated...
I don't agree with "No LOS (and no disengagement) in your own space"....
Having played with "LOS to take anything" anyway for so long, I agree with having to have an LOS to attack Planets and strongly agree with having to have a LOS to count for VPs.
I could probably adjust to an "area of control" type thing, but, think the range of this area is too open for debate (and not worth arguing about), so probably should go with LOS rules that we've all pretty much gotten used to and save the "area of control" for another server for now.