« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5  All

Topic: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)  (Read 10174 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Soreyes

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3903
  • Gender: Male
  • It's Not News. It's CNN
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2005, 03:08:10 am »
Yes
Logged


[img width=600 height=150]

Offline KBFLordKrueg

  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3733
  • KBF CO
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2005, 04:08:45 am »
Quote from: Corbomite on April 17, 2005, 01:57:05 am
Quote from: Mazeppa on April 16, 2005, 09:31:35 pm
I still don't know why we ever left Battlecomm.  Worked great, even for modem users. 


Word! I still have it. I thought it was the best of the lot.

I agree. Although, after using both TS and VT and still using both, running both at the same time even to communicate with all pilots, still think VT has superior vioce quality and better features.
Just, my HPO... ;)
Logged
Lord Krueg
KBF CO
We are the Dead

Offline EmeraldEdge

  • D.Net VIP
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1161
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2005, 04:57:44 am »
I don't mind using VT myself, except that I'm one of the lucky few that has to reset my audio device after a couple of folks talk before I can broadcast.  Other than that folks come over it nicely, just annoying to have to use the hotkey and wait for it to respond (takes a second but I get a nice ping when it's done) before I can talk.  Oh, well.  Haven't had any luck running both at the same time and being able to broadcast, always says my audio device is in use.
Logged

Offline Capt Jeff

  • 1AF
  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 736
  • Gender: Male
    • Facebook
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2005, 05:13:33 am »
YES
Logged
Capt Jeff

Former SFC2.NET Administrator
C.O., Heavy Command Cruiser
USS Crasher NCC 1733

1AF---Friendship, Honor, Fun.  It's what we Play For.

Offline Father Ted

  • Starfleet Chaplain-Recalled to Active Duty
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1356
  • Next to Ted Williams in the freezer
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #24 on: April 17, 2005, 07:49:21 am »
Quote from: KBF-Crim on April 17, 2005, 12:53:02 am
So...Yes...but for the love of kahless...blind draw...no trades...and YOU pick faction leaders... ;)

Ditto. No backroom dealings and no horsetrading, and a draft works for me.
Logged

Captain: USS Majestik Moose NCC-1712


"Live as brave men; and if fortune is adverse, front its blows with brave hearts." -Cicero
"Superman wears Jack Bauer jammies."-Anonymous
"Better to fight for something than live for nothing." -George S. Patton

Offline Green

  • I'm not a
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3004
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #25 on: April 17, 2005, 08:09:06 am »
Yes
Logged

Offline WarSears

  • <MEAN FACE> @ Nail
  • Hot and Spicy
  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 355
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2005, 09:43:49 am »
Count me in.
Logged
War-Sears
Klingon Black Fleet


Offline C-Los

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 436
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #27 on: April 17, 2005, 10:12:55 am »
No problems here... ;)

Have to see how the server is set up though..."Sorry"    Just tired of the OOB thingy !!
Logged
C-Los, Commanding Officer U.S.S. Scorpion




"Life is short, have fun and enjoy !"

Offline Julin Eurthyr

  • Veltrassi Ambassador at Large
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1057
  • Gender: Male
  • Back in Exile due to Win 7 - ISC RM/Strat Com.
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2005, 10:25:05 am »
I'm in.

Glad to hear this will be a typical 2-sided server, while still trying out other concepts...

I'm even willing to reprise my role as RM / Strategic Commander for a side, and I promise to follow all the rules, such as completly blind draft (where nobody sees my draft list except the draft manager and possibly my A/RMs), No trades, which includes consulting with the other house leaders pre-draft to attempt to ensure that certain players are on the same house, unless the draft is designed to allocate entire fleet-blocks, no politics (which is hard on a 2-sided server), etc. etc.

I just ask that you post the rules clearly prior to the main signup phase actually begins so that those who sign up know what they're getting into... ;)
Logged

AKA: Koloth Kinshaya - Lord of the House Kinshaya in the Klingon Empire
S'Leth - Romulan Admiral
Some anonymous strongman in Prime Industries

Offline Dfly

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1735
  • Lyran Alliance Lives
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #29 on: April 17, 2005, 10:48:10 am »
Yes

And I have no problem with VT or TS and can run both simutaniously. Also have RW(outdated now) and BC(probably outdated), as well as Sidewinder.
Logged

Offline Age

  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2690
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #30 on: April 17, 2005, 12:06:11 pm »
   The reason I mentioned TS is becuase some of us have small HDs and only would want one program on our systems The D3ers use TS as well as Cugs and UAW in which I intend to play on all of them.I am just trying to simplify it that is all and if it works for D3 , Cugs and UaW  why not use TS atleast we would have better way to communicate between the RM/ARMs and Server Admins.
Logged

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #31 on: April 17, 2005, 01:52:46 pm »
I'm supportive of trying a blind draft and it wouldn't deter my participation in any server.  I especially don't see it as an issue if the shiplist is identical. 

Can't say that I'm in or not on the server yet, however as I have to look at the other settings.  I've gotten involved in other games now and am picking and choosing servers with some care, and wouldn't want to sign up for a draft if I was not going to put in a certain amount of time.
Logged

Offline KBF-Kurok

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 829
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #32 on: April 17, 2005, 01:56:21 pm »
no problems here as for team speak. i have used it and am on 56k in order for me to play using it i  have to turn the BW down so far it sounds like crap and is  hard to  understand,I have battle com and vt and can probably dig up rw  if need be.
Logged

Offline Green

  • I'm not a
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 3004
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #33 on: April 17, 2005, 02:04:48 pm »
Seems like voice chat is a pretty major factor (understandably so).  I can use VT or TS w/ no problem, but it others can't for whatever reason (and there are valid reasons).  Did you want that to be considered also Hexx?
Logged

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #34 on: April 17, 2005, 02:15:43 pm »
Good point Green, I can also use both but have the newer version of Ventrilo installed for my other gaming community and I dont think the 2 are compatible, would kinda suck to play without voice comms.
Logged

Offline Nemesis

  • Captain Kayn
  • Global Moderator
  • Commodore
  • *
  • Posts: 13071
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #35 on: April 17, 2005, 02:58:30 pm »
After all the allegations concerning the Klingon civil war server.  I think that for a draft to work it will have to be public.  A list of all pilots followed by a RM by RM sequential draft choice. 
Logged
Do unto others as Frey has done unto you.
Seti Team    Free Software
I believe truth and principle do matter. If you have to sacrifice them to get the results you want, then the results aren't worth it.
 FoaS_XC : "Take great pains to distinguish a criticism vs. an attack. A person reading a post should never be able to confuse the two."

Offline Hexx

  • Sexy Shoeless Lyran God Of War
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6058
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #36 on: April 17, 2005, 03:43:25 pm »
I'd like to thank everyone for actually agreeing to sign up for it so far.
(C'mon You know Captain Natas wants to play)
I didn't realize the voice coms were a make or break for so many people, it may affect the outcome.
I'll think about it
ATM it will likely be a blind draft, it may simpley involve me assigning every player a number and then divying them up somehow.
It will not be a publicly announced draft, simply due to the fact that I'm not going to run a server where someone is publicly drafted
second last. (cuz we all know who last will be... ::)   bastards..)
I know most of you can run either or, maybe the people who can run one or the other will sit out of the initial draft until the 2 leaders
decide who will use what. (Oh, did I mention I need 2 leaders btw?)
Logged
Courageously Protesting "Lyran Pelt Day"

Offline KBF-Reejr

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 67
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #37 on: April 17, 2005, 04:23:22 pm »
Yes I would play with a draft.
Logged

Offline Marikar

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #38 on: April 17, 2005, 05:28:03 pm »
Draft is fine by me preferably lager ;)
Logged

Offline GDA-Agave

  • That's MR. Planet Battering Ram to you buddy!!
  • Hot and Spicy
  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • Gender: Male
  • Fear my tequila breath!!!
Re: The Ultimate Sacrifice (D2 wise)
« Reply #39 on: April 17, 2005, 05:29:53 pm »
Abso-frickin-lutely!!

Just as long as our leader brings a good supply of tequila, and doesn't mind me making planet-spears of my fellow pilots.   ;D

Making fun no matter where I go!!   ::)


Agave

P.S. Able to run both TS and VT.
Logged
One of the few, the proud, THE GORN!!
Gorn Dragon Alliance - Protecting Ghdar and the Bruce Way!

Gorn Dragon Templar
"Protecting the roads to Brucedom for all travelers of faith"


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5  All
« previous next »