I'm not sure If I'm saying that right. I dont want to give the wrong impression. Sounds like the hull class would be more like a larger CL or smaller CA then (something on that order) as far as TNG hull size/class is concerned.
From what we've seen in Star Trek over the years, size shouldn't matter when it comes to weaponry-capability, right? Remember the Defiant? Packed a punch yet was one of the smallest starships I've ever seen, just bigger than an Oberth. Just because it's over 400 meters doesn't mean it's not a CA or CL. The Akira's a bit shorter in length and yet she can pack a punch as a battlecruiser. Considering the Titan's description and the armaments given, I'd say she'd be a CA or CC.
But I wouldn't necessarily call the Titan "a well-armed science vessel". That may be closer to what an Intrepid-class is. I wouldn't call the Constitution-class a well-armed science-vessel either. And considering the classification as an explorer, I wouldn't even call the Galaxy-class a "well-armed science vessel" if you take into account its role. It's an exploration vessel,
not a science vessel. There's a difference: While the explorer takes on scientific roles, it does so while it wanders around in uncharted territory. If there's something worthwile and little danger is around, perhaps a science vessel will go after it and study it more while the big boys move further into uncharted territory.
Man ... as far as size is concerned that is a little disappointing. I dont think it should be much larger than the Sovy ... but .. dude .... to be not too much bigger than the Voyager .. that is a bit of a let down.
*cough*Letdown*cough*
So, after all these years of single-handedly saving the Federation from the likes of the Borg and sitting next to Zefram Cochrane during First Contact, the best Starfleet could offer William T. Riker is a science vessel, the sort of ship that the bad guys of Trek use for target practice? At least it's armed; considering the blatant political messages in the last few novels and this ship's description, I was picturing it shooting flower power torpedoes and rainbow phaser beams.
Quoting Bernd Schneider:
Every fan should feel encouraged to include whatever he likes to his personal view of the Star Trek Universe. That's what I'm doing with my personal ship designs, the ASDB and the Starfleet Museum too. I would never want to miss the fan-made stuff all around the planet because they really enrich the universe, no matter if I "believe" in them. I probably can't help those who don't even want to see anything that has not the seal of Paramount on it or the other extreme group, those who don't care about the idea of Star Trek and are turning Starfleet into a military organization with big-gunned warships.
And now let me ask you a question. Hoping that the both of you read the bolded emphasis on the above quote, are you one of these types of fans?
The Titan's description was obviously different, but not dissapointing. It's not as big and fanboyish as it would seem, and although might be a letdown for you guys, it hadn't for me. Titan doesn't sound big if you think of it as a moon. It's like how Venus doesn't sound like a lovely name if you view it as a planet with harsh,
harsh atmospheric conditions. I really like the fact that the ship wasn't named after mythology, but named after a celestial body. It's more related to Starfleet's original purpose: Exploration.
There's no need for Fanboyish Sovereign-esque battlecruisers and most other FC-related ships anymore. Sure there's some chaos here and there in our block of the galaxy, but we can handle it. We're not at war, there's no big threat anymore. The Galaxy-class starships and other exploration cruisers--like the Luna-class Starships--are going back to what Starfleet does best:
Exploration. I like it that way: Star Trek returning back to what it's supposed to truely be. If we want our daily dose of mindless action, we have SFB and/or SFC for that, no?
(
Just a note, if my message seemed harsh against you guys, I'm sorry. Being insulting wasn't my intention.)