Maybe Microsoft doesn't suck as much as i thought
, but perhaps they made VPC7 *too* well.
Let me explain...
Mac users aren't used to having to search for drivers for their hardware since Apple built their system and loaded the disk with everything you need to use it, including the drivers to all the hardware it has. However, in the Land of Windows, when you install the OS, you're only installing Windows. Although the thing may boot and look fine, if you have no video drivers (or the standard Windows display driver), the screen will refresh very slowly, like you're missing 33% of your processor. I should've remembered that little tidbit since the same thing happened when I put a fresh copy of XP Home on my other machine. I couldn't figure out what was wrong until I visited PCPitstop and checked out my display settings. What should've read "nVidia GeForce 4" instead said "generic display driver", so I had to sit through a 3 hour download to get my sweet graphics back.
So here I am doing the same thing, but for a virtual PC. I can't think of one reason why Microsoft couldn't've worked more closely with Apple to make VPC work with more of the Mac's components instead of making the two interact as if they were on a network, and requiring a separate set of display drivers.
Oh well. I'll check back here and let y'all know how it turns out. Thanks Toasty