Topic: SNSGALAXY is done (Read 11447 times)

manitoba1073 · « **on:** February 08, 2005, 11:31:01 pm »

here she is ftp://FTP://67.136.232.124/MANITOBA

Don Karnage · « **Reply #1 on:** February 08, 2005, 11:34:48 pm »

very good, the link is not working, i don't like the galaxy class but still a great job.

FedRebel · « **Reply #2 on:** February 08, 2005, 11:54:15 pm »

Are you sure anyone can dl the ship?

When I click the link I get a message saying that there was a problem trying to access the FTP server and I should make sure I have permission to access it, then it tells that the operation has been timed out

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #3 on:** February 09, 2005, 12:27:45 am »

I STILL can't access the site

But the ship looks great ni the pic
UGH !!!!
-MP

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 09, 2005, 12:38:06 am »

it should be working. now theres been 50/50. try IE6 and chk that ur able to see and axcess FTP sites with ur browser

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #5 on:** February 09, 2005, 12:43:33 am »

Quote from: manitoba1073 on February 09, 2005, 12:38:06 am

it should be working. now theres been 50/50. try IE6 and chk that ur able to see and axcess FTP sites with ur browser

Ummmmm ok how the heck do I do that ???? What's IE six Mani ?

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 09, 2005, 12:47:27 am »

IE6 is internet explorer. with it open, go to tools tab then internet options then click on advanced tab , should be in the browser section

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 09, 2005, 01:09:18 am »

2.? ? ? ? Ping? works, but the browser still reports a 425 error: Transparent Proxy has been disabled in WinProxy, or the local machine has an incorrect Gateway address (those two are required for Transparent Proxy connections), or the browser has not yet been configured to use a proxy (required for a Classic Proxy connection). Refer to the section on configuring your browsers

another thing try passive mode on ur browsers or something like taht

Lord Schtupp · « **Reply #8 on:** February 09, 2005, 01:29:51 am »

Great work!

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #9 on:** February 09, 2005, 02:08:23 am »

Staying up for now, I actually tried I.E. and in the process got one or two popups, not as bad as I thought (compared to the 20+ last time I used I.E. last year). I got it. It is a wonderful job, and as I said, there was a pet peeve or two I had, mainly concerning the lights. They were really minor, especially with when I could open up PSP, compare the files, copy the illumination selection thing for the TGA files and do some copy and pasting... *shrug* Just so I could have a more "canon" Galaxy-class starship.
Just in my opinion, that's all, and not to downplay you guys: You've done a wonderful job converting Scotchy's Galaxy-class model as I said before again and again. What's great in my opinion is that I could also use Scotchy's other name and registries. I done so, and in SFC: OP, I came up with this screenshot:

(Edit: I got rid of it to conserve space.)

(I used the NCC-70637 U.S.S. Galaxy ID textures from Scotchy's Galaxy-class textures from the BC model. Just FYI.) The model turned out beautiful in-game and ran real smooth, but my only pet peeve in playability was that it's an SFC3 model, meaning the hardpoints don't work at all for SFC2/OP; the weapons fire from the center/"neck" of the ship. However, if that's the only conversion, then oh well: That's the price to pay for awesome beauty. I really like this ship nonetheless. I know I'll be having fun with it for quite a while. Once again, good work on converting her.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 09, 2005, 02:28:14 am »

thanxs chris. not sure how to set up HP and taht in OP sorry. im sure some one will get it done for OP now that its finished for SFC3. and ur screenie looks awesome. im working on finding something for other browsers too .

so everyone enjoy

Sapharite · « **Reply #11 on:** February 09, 2005, 02:40:27 am »

Manitoba the sever denys my anynomous access as well as through IE6 and FTP Commander... It rejects my e-mail adress :-/

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #12 on:** February 09, 2005, 02:45:32 am »

im working on it sorry

Sapharite · « **Reply #13 on:** February 09, 2005, 02:48:15 am »

Aaaa Ok I thought it was abit bigger problem

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #14 on:** February 09, 2005, 02:58:13 am »

not yet its not

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 09, 2005, 03:02:11 am »

ok now try

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #16 on:** February 09, 2005, 04:26:06 am »

ok i think i got it figured out now. goto internet options, click advanced tab. then uncheck the passive mode. that should work now.

Sapharite · « **Reply #17 on:** February 09, 2005, 08:11:49 am »

Ok it's working

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #18 on:** February 09, 2005, 12:17:40 pm »

If you ask me, she looks stunning with or without the spotlights, especially when I'm sure most people who play SFC2/OP or SFC3 won't bother keeping their ambience lighting very low.

Darkseid · « **Reply #19 on:** February 09, 2005, 01:55:36 pm »

This is one Heck of a Galaxy!

I've downloaded it and it's ready to rock! Ok, I wiped up my drool and took some SFC3 Screen Shots

Dawntreader · « **Reply #20 on:** February 10, 2005, 02:50:14 am »

I love it. The ship is WZ quality work. It looks almost perfect.
The hardpoints work, but they need to be altered. The Heavy HPs turned to Phaser HPs, and Phaser HPs to Heavy. Right now, phasers fire from the photon launcher. The photons fire from the phaser emitters.

Sapharite · « **Reply #21 on:** February 10, 2005, 03:15:01 am »

Quote from: Fallen_Warrior on February 09, 2005, 11:21:41 am

Im glad you like her chris i ended up using the Alpha channel to get the lightmaps on the sauser then made the rest up as i went i wanted to get the lightmaps as canon as i could but i also wanted her to look stunning in low light so i added a few spot lights here and there

Hey F_W let somebody make a Nebula from it... I can't wait myself to see a Nebula class from it

Darkseid · « **Reply #22 on:** February 10, 2005, 02:56:13 pm »

A Galaxy X would always be sweet to have out of this. Or at least a Dominion War upgrade with that Gray mark down her Star drive and Phaser Strips on the Nacelles.

Centurus · « **Reply #23 on:** February 10, 2005, 04:00:01 pm »

Don't they have a Nebula, Galaxy X, and Venture refit on BC? We could convert those too. :-D

Darkseid · « **Reply #24 on:** February 10, 2005, 06:22:19 pm »

CG Sovereign V 2.0 is almost ready this is the shot posted at BCfiles.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #25 on:** February 10, 2005, 07:01:34 pm »

sweet

when its done dl to the ftp site put it in the conversions folder

Darkseid · « **Reply #26 on:** February 10, 2005, 07:14:39 pm »

Quote from: manitoba1073 on February 10, 2005, 07:01:34 pm

sweet

when its done dl to the ftp site put it in the conversions folder

you mean in here? ftp://FTP://67.136.232.124/MANITOBA
I'm not sure when the ship will be downloadable but i'll keep watchin for it.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #27 on:** February 10, 2005, 07:28:19 pm »

thats fine.

OlBuzzard · « **Reply #28 on:** February 10, 2005, 08:46:46 pm »

Really sweet model !!

CC22 · « **Reply #29 on:** February 12, 2005, 01:41:59 pm »

um I don't want to put a stinker on things but you've completely missed the battle section phasers off the neck, pylons and the pairs around the rear torp and below. Any chance you can rectify it? I tried myself but Milkshape hates teh poly count and it does detract a lot from the detail.

Great conversion other than that though

Darkseid · « **Reply #30 on:** February 12, 2005, 02:33:49 pm »

I did notice the Phasers are gone but I think that is because the only Phasers in Bridge Commander are the two main ones to begin with. But I never really cared if they were there or not, the model looks great as it is. But one thing that I did notice is that when I viewed the ship in the Mod Viewer the textures for the Phaser strips were not there. It is just white. But its not really important as long as they work in the game, and they do. I just thought it was weird.

CC22 · « **Reply #31 on:** February 12, 2005, 02:53:13 pm »

Quote from: Spartan - 117 on February 12, 2005, 02:33:49 pm

I did notice the Phasers are gone but I think that is because the only Phasers in Bridge Commander are the two main ones to begin with. But I never really cared if they were there or not, the model looks great as it is. But one thing that I did notice is that when I viewed the ship in the Mod Viewer the textures for the Phaser strips were not there. It is just white. But its not really important as long as they work in the game, and they do. I just thought it was weird.

Um no all of them are used and also you are missing the point that its meant to be as true to the real model as possible.

markyd · « **Reply #32 on:** February 12, 2005, 07:36:00 pm »

Dude if that model is 100% yours complete from scratch then I take my hat off too you.... as making the hull section on a galaxy model is no easy task.... infact it is FU**ING very hard work........

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #33 on:** February 12, 2005, 08:27:37 pm »

Marky, it's actually a conversion from a BC custom-made model by a BC modeler named "Scotchy".

Scotchy's Galaxy-class model for Bridge Commander

markyd · « **Reply #34 on:** February 12, 2005, 08:30:24 pm »

Oh.... thanks chris...... great Conversion Mani

Darkseid · « **Reply #35 on:** February 12, 2005, 08:51:45 pm »

Quote from: CC22 on February 12, 2005, 02:53:13 pm

Quote from: Spartan - 117 on February 12, 2005, 02:33:49 pm
I did notice the Phasers are gone but I think that is because the only Phasers in Bridge Commander are the two main ones to begin with. But I never really cared if they were there or not, the model looks great as it is. But one thing that I did notice is that when I viewed the ship in the Mod Viewer the textures for the Phaser strips were not there. It is just white. But its not really important as long as they work in the game, and they do. I just thought it was weird.

Um no all of them are used and also you are missing the point that its meant to be as true to the real model as possible.

Were they? I have actually only played the Demo version and the only Phasers that worked were the main two on the saucer. I guess they all work in the full version.

CC22 · « **Reply #36 on:** February 12, 2005, 10:13:20 pm »

oh lol that explains it yea there were only limited phasers on the stock ships. This SNS Galaxy has supurb HP's. If you get the chance BC is well worth purchasing btw

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #37 on:** February 12, 2005, 10:36:23 pm »

In my opinion, BC didn't last long for me, enjoyability-wise. The mod installer things got too complicated for me back around 2002, and I played multiplayer online for a short while before I gave up. I was about to get it until I got Klingon Academy again at Christmas 2003 (I lost it around August 2001), and decided playing that again. Gameplay and mod-wise I say KA was better, and it gave me much memories, be it whilst playing Single Player or Multiplayer. Don't get me wrong, BC's probably good now with more visual eye-candy, but I'm if-iffy on reinstalling it and getting all sorts of things that you don't normally need for installing mods in KA or SFC, for example. Plus, I'm running out of space... *shrug*
I also didn't notice the missing phaser strips until recently. I was too amazed at someone converting Scotchy's Galaxy, and I was tinkering with the ID Illumination and normal ID texture maps to pay attention... *shrug* Still, it would be nice for an update, if bothered. That, and hardpoints for SFC2.

But that's probably asking too much, and I should be glad with what I have. And I am, at the moment.

Dawntreader · « **Reply #38 on:** February 13, 2005, 03:12:43 am »

Scotchy has a really nice Akira up. Hope someone will convert it. Please!!
http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/SNS_Akira;21059

Also these ones would be nice:
http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/Challenger;27029
http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/Reinvisioned_Galactica_Ship_Pack;36087

Also, the pictures of the BC model show phaser strips that are missing on the conversion.

Darkseid · « **Reply #39 on:** February 13, 2005, 02:01:33 pm »

Actually I have been hoping to buy Bridge Commander. I enjoyed it. Modding it sounds hard but I thought modding Grand Theft Auto would be hard and it turned out to be easier than modding SFC after getting used to it. I am glad to hear that the real Bridge Commander has accurate weapons. The Demo irritated me because the Galaxy was so defenseless. She only had two Phasers and three Photon Launchers. That sucked, she is supposed to have like three Photons and 11 Phasers. Oh and that is one nice Akira. But I’m still geared towards a Nemesis Sovereign. I think the Nemesis Sovereign was the most beautiful Sovereign, its just that the movie was aimed at fast paced action that we never got to see any beauty shots like in First Contact. Although I got Goosebumps when they first showed her flyby in Nemesis.

CC22 · « **Reply #40 on:** February 16, 2005, 02:34:49 pm »

Hate to be a nag lol but is there any chance you can fix her? I opened her up in model editor and found the pylon phasers embedded in the Saucer section for some strange reason ???. After some anoying fiddling I had them placed properly but it is still missing the 'neck' phasers.
Also the 'Venture' sub type and the Dominion War version with the added fighter bay would be so great to have converted....

Pleeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaase lol.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #41 on:** February 16, 2005, 11:09:36 pm »

sorry its taking awhile works been hecktic lately. but i should be able to fix it saturday

Sapharite · « **Reply #42 on:** February 17, 2005, 02:39:32 am »

Mani whatabout this Excelsior Study Model on your ftp? It has some minor flaws but there's nothing more to correct. She's damn fine exept those extra faces which can be seen over the deflector dish

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #43 on:** February 17, 2005, 11:30:17 pm »

will do too.

CC22 · « **Reply #44 on:** February 18, 2005, 06:47:54 pm »

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #45 on:** February 19, 2005, 04:23:27 pm »

the SNS is corrected i hope. i put the phaser strips on the rear pylons. if i missed anything thing else just let me know. now to touch up the excelsior study 2 model

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #46 on:** February 19, 2005, 06:41:19 pm »

I don't mean to nitpick harshly as Manitoba has done a wonderful, wonderful job here, but if the SNS Galaxy is going to be accurate (with the phaser strips), look at these pics:

(Edit: Just clearing up some space, so you won't see 'em.)

The colors on the circles drawn on pics of the SFC versions have been inverted, so y'know where they should go (roughly, not exactly).

Again, I don't mean to nitpick too harshly and whine or anything like that. As I stated, Manitoba has done well with the conversion and I should be glad with what I have. I am... But if improvements are in need, I just like to help out by pointing something out.

CC22 · « **Reply #47 on:** February 19, 2005, 08:47:22 pm »

Have you done the phaser strips that are on the back of the saucer? Ive corrected it all myself fully but an 'official' version would be good lol... also my version has the id textures reversed on the hull for some reason.. pain in the a*se $:-\$
Also any word on the Venture and Dominion war versions?

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #48 on:** February 19, 2005, 11:31:22 pm »

u guys rnt nitpickin, ur helping getting it right. as im not a big galaxy fan lol .

Darkseid · « **Reply #49 on:** February 20, 2005, 12:06:10 am »

I noticed that if or when there is a Dominion War refit, that there is a dark grey marking on the back of the ship. I don’t see the point of it but it's there. It looks kind of neat I guess. But the only big details were the added Phasers on the Nacelles. But if I could have anything it would be a really good X Variant make out of this. That would be sweet!

Dawntreader · « **Reply #50 on:** February 20, 2005, 12:11:01 am »

The new version has got serious alignment issues with some of the surfaces. It is visible in this picture:

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #51 on:** February 20, 2005, 12:15:36 am »

yeah i noticed that after i saw the pix, sorry for that , i was really tired. and missed it. when i went back and redid it to get the phaser strips.

CC22 · « **Reply #52 on:** February 20, 2005, 03:31:28 pm »

Aw! lol I'm glad you have such an enlightened attitude Mani. It is just merely to help you get her perfect as you say

For those asking about the DS9 version the BC release came with 3versions... Galaxy standard (ie Ent D), Venture with the necelle phasers, and a so-called Dominion war refit that is the same as the standard but with a dedicated 'fighter bay' above the main shuttle bay. Each version has different coloured deflectors/deflector mountings... No different coloured battle-sections despite the on screen evidence. Personally this is fine by me lol.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #53 on:** February 20, 2005, 04:54:35 pm »

manitoba1073, I can't get into your ftp site. Is there another place people can download it from?

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #54 on:** February 20, 2005, 07:10:25 pm »

Heh, we're interested in the exact same ship, Spadaro. Not just of class, but of name and registry as well.

Try typing the URL in internet explorer again, or in some explorer window or something. *shrug* It works fine for me when I do that.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #55 on:** February 21, 2005, 08:37:00 pm »

To quote manitoba1073's post, "ok i think i got it figured out now. goto internet options, click advanced tab. then uncheck the passive mode. that should work now", every time I try to do that, IE freezes up. Why not post it at SFC3files.com (it IS for SFC3, right?).

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #56 on:** February 21, 2005, 09:28:04 pm »

I hope someone helps him make it for SFC2 as well (and maybe if we're lucky, SFC1 too), so everyone playing some SFC game could enjoy this model, and not just the SFC3ers that can see phasers coming from phaser arrays and not only magically-through the neck like SFC2ers.

Dawntreader · « **Reply #57 on:** February 21, 2005, 11:54:47 pm »

In TNG, the phasers actually did fire from torpedo bays once. Don't remember which episode though.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #58 on:** February 22, 2005, 12:27:32 am »

ok its updated. should be allgood now. and i will upload it here too.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #59 on:** February 22, 2005, 01:03:51 am »

Quote from: Dawntreader on February 21, 2005, 11:54:47 pm

In TNG, the phasers actually did fire from torpedo bays once. Don't remember which episode though.

They did in "Darmok" [TNG]. I heard somewhere that there were complaints about it in fanmail back then. I thought they didn't have a load of Photon Torps back then so they reconfigured it temporarily into a Phaser turret/bank/etc. I think though in "The Best of Both Worlds, Part 1" [TNG], when the Enterprise-D first fired all weapons at the Borg, there was phasers firing near, if not inside the Torpedo bay, despite Photon Torpedoes firing. I have to look at my VHS copy though.

As for the Galaxy-class model being updated, I'm downloading as we speak. It'll take some time, and I'm tired, so I'll try it tommorow.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #60 on:** February 22, 2005, 05:10:07 am »

I thought the weapon that looked like a phaser was fired from the deflector dish during the Borg encounter

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #61 on:** February 22, 2005, 11:16:39 am »

That big powerful beam was fired from the deflector dish, but you're confusing that with standard Phasers now. At their first encounter of the Borg (in 2366/2367) since a year before (2365), they had some newer defensive capabilities that proved to be useful only for a bit. When they lost shields, they then decided to fire an all-out Phaser and Photon Torpedo salvo. At one time, I could've sworn that it looked like near or at the Photon Torpedo bay that a Phaser was shot near, while Photons were launched.

CC22 · « **Reply #62 on:** February 23, 2005, 11:43:33 pm »

Just wanted to ask... Is she still scaled as when 1st released? if so its far to small :s.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #63 on:** February 24, 2005, 12:19:44 am »

i'll have to chk. lol works keeping me busy.

Darkseid · « **Reply #64 on:** February 24, 2005, 12:24:15 am »

It didnt seem too small to me. She is bigger than the stock model.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #65 on:** March 06, 2005, 07:12:48 pm »

manitoba1073, there are still some problems with it. It is still missing 2 phasers, the pylon phasers should be longer, and the size seems to be off. I'd post screenshots if I could, but for some ****ing reason, every time I try to post said screenshots, IE crashes.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #66 on:** March 06, 2005, 08:13:52 pm »

Do you have MSN, Spadaro? You can send me your screenshots and I'll host 'em for you or something.

I noticed the inaccuracies too, but I never bothered with noting 'em.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #67 on:** March 06, 2005, 09:15:40 pm »

What do you mean by MSN?

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #68 on:** March 06, 2005, 09:19:28 pm »

I'll take it by that post that you don't have MSN Messenger? When people say "having MSN" normally, it means they're implying they/asking someone if they have MSN Messenger, an IM program. Do you have any IM program at all? AOL Instant Messenger? ICQ? Any at all?

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #69 on:** March 07, 2005, 12:57:04 am »

Oh. Well, I think I do, but I'm not sure. My computer HAD AOL IM, but one of the first things I did on it was to delete AOL (I think AOL is evil, you see). I've never had much use for IM programs, as I keep to myself.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #70 on:** March 13, 2005, 01:59:40 pm »

I just opened it up in the Taldren model viewer. The nacelle pylon phasers are imbedded in the saucer section, and I couldn't find the other two missing phasers.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #71 on:** March 14, 2005, 12:01:56 pm »

Here are the screenshots. I have to post them using the computers at my school.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #72 on:** March 14, 2005, 12:43:48 pm »

Patience, my friend. Patience. Perhaps Manitoba'll get back to this another time, and if he does, patience is what you need.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #73 on:** March 14, 2005, 10:43:16 pm »

While this is still on Page 1 from recent replies, I'm just curious if anyone might take a shot at some SFC2 hardpoints on this model... Not badly badly needed, but just curious. As I keep saying, I have it going good having this model at the very least.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #74 on:** March 14, 2005, 11:02:24 pm »

as far as the phaser strips go i had to improvise on them. as there wasnt some of them in the original file from which it was converted. for the glows im not sure y they werent removed as it was run through the sfc3 modding tools to be deleted. ill see what can be done though.

CC22 · « **Reply #75 on:** March 15, 2005, 04:59:44 pm »

Is there any word on the 2other variants of the BC version? War refit and venture?

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #76 on:** March 15, 2005, 10:47:12 pm »

i will be getting to them soon. just like F_W said alot of things going on right now.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #77 on:** March 24, 2005, 02:50:05 am »

should be done now. its as close as it can get guys. so i hope u like it.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #78 on:** March 25, 2005, 07:17:55 pm »

Uh, manitoba? You got the missing phasers corrected, but the pylon phasers have been doubled. Also, I don't think this is supposed to be the Venture. Plus the size still seems to be off. Sorry if I sound bossy/nitpickey, but I'm a perfectionist.

Khalee1 · « **Reply #79 on:** March 25, 2005, 07:21:34 pm »

the glows look odd to me.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #80 on:** March 25, 2005, 11:53:45 pm »

ko for some reason the glows are not clearning properly. s far as the phaser go from what i gotout of it that what everyone one was saying but ill look into to it.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #81 on:** March 26, 2005, 01:29:14 am »

I think the words were a bit more confusing, so I hope pictures would help:

(Edit: Just saving some space, so I'm removing pictures. Besides, Mani perfected it! At least for SFC3, to which I don't have...)

You almost had it right. The phaser arrays circled in red shouldn't be there. You were close though, and a nice move, kitbashing the Galaxy-class Dreadnought (Galaxy-X) model with this in order to get the arrays right... Well, almost.

(Edit: Just saving some space, so I'm removing pictures.)

Not as much an error, but to point out that the U.S.S. Venture in DS9 had this distinctive feature, and was a variant. It's a nice feature, but not truely needed. Maybe take those off or kitbash with the original engines on previous versions?

One last problem, the size:

(Edit: Just saving some space, so I'm removing pictures.)

As you can see, version three (the one before the recent version that you worked on) was pretty small, and seemed just a little bigger than WZ's Constitution-class refit. That's real small. And the most-recent version (version 4) is smaller than the previous version (version 3). If you plan on resizing it correctly (preferably when comparing to WZ's work, like his beautiful Constitution-class), here's something to help:

(Edit: Just saving some space, so I'm removing pictures.)

This is a comparision of the Galaxy-class to the Constitution-class (refit), a collage of Ex Astris Scientia's Fleet Chart Picture. I had to kitbash the picture to make the comparison much easier.

I just felt like helping out with the perfectioning of this Galaxy-class model we have in our hands, that's all. If it takes patience or if it doesn't work out though, that's alright. But it would be very much appreciated if it is nearly-perfected. As I said, if such is in-progress, I'd like to help out in my own way.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #82 on:** March 26, 2005, 01:37:39 am »

Chris, I owe ya one. You took the words right outta me mouth. Also, for the record, take a look at this shot taken by Spartan - 117 and posted a few days after the initial release. I think that is the size you should shoot for.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #83 on:** March 26, 2005, 02:06:22 am »

For the heck of it, I did a similar size comparison in-game SFC2 for Version 1 and Version 3 Galaxy-class Starship models:

(Edit: Just saving some space, so I'm removing pictures.)

Again, just to help. I need to get to bed now...

(And now that I've got some, I'd like to point out my labeling error: Where it says "Version 2" in the first comparison, it should be "Version 3"... I don't know how I let that error slip by me, tired or not. *shrug*)

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #84 on:** March 26, 2005, 11:32:18 am »

np guys i do appreciate the help.

manitoba1073 · « **Reply #85 on:** March 26, 2005, 03:22:28 pm »

i havent had a chence to chk the glows but the size and everything else is good now

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #86 on:** March 26, 2005, 04:03:53 pm »

I'm downloading it now. Should have results in an hour or so (I've got a lot of things to do today).

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #87 on:** March 26, 2005, 04:32:51 pm »

(Comes running in, all out of breath) Success!! THIS is how a Galaxy should look. manitoba1073, I'd take my hat off to you (were I wearing a hat, that is).

Age · « **Reply #88 on:** March 26, 2005, 05:33:38 pm »

I really like the close up shots as it really looks like 1701-D from TNG show and I like the comparison of the Galaxy to the Constitution.I like version 2 compared with with Constitution.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #89 on:** March 26, 2005, 08:41:41 pm »

Finally! Almost perfection...

Properly-scaled and the details are right. I thank you for that, Mani.

However...

I guess it's because I don't bother playing SFC3 (especially when I don't have it) and that this model is mainly for that (considering the lack of SFC2 hardpoints). Oh well. I'm going to hit myself over that, but at least having this ship is good enough for me, I guess. *shrug* Again, thanks very much Mani.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #90 on:** March 27, 2005, 02:23:48 am »

I understand it's Spadaro's 18th Birthday today. Well, what better way to celebrate than to give him a set of keys for his first ever Galaxy-class Starship:

Enjoy the birthday while you can.

Dawntreader · « **Reply #91 on:** March 27, 2005, 03:54:29 am »

Finally, perfection. I only wish it were hardpointed for sfc2 now.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #92 on:** March 27, 2005, 01:33:01 pm »

Hey! Gimme the Galaxy, Chris! (Laughs) Seriously, though, what does the text above the ship say. (it looks Japanese, but I can't read Japanese)

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #93 on:** March 27, 2005, 01:44:19 pm »

I layed eyes on her before you ever did. I even have the plaque (and I can find a CG image of my plaque and hash it out for you)!

Anyways, the text is another traditional birthday greeting just translated.

Captain Spadaro · « **Reply #94 on:** March 27, 2005, 01:47:07 pm »

Quote from: Chris Johnson on March 27, 2005, 01:44:19 pm

I layed eyes on her before you ever did. I even have the plaque (and I can find a CG image of my plaque and hash it out for you)!

Anyways, the text is another traditional birthday greeting just translated.

"Hash it out"? What in the name of James T. Kirk does that mean? I would like to see the plaque, though. BTW, what is your avatar a pic of?

USS Mariner · « **Reply #95 on:** March 27, 2005, 02:03:26 pm »

Wow, I hope the Venture variant will be avalible. Does SNS plan on making the Excelsior, and if so, will he use the 467m figure or the 635m that the model suggests?

Here's Bernd's article on it (biased toward 467 so he can be lazy.

,) and the SCN links to the original topics. More thanks goes to Atrahasis for pointing the problem out.

"Honey, I Shrunk The Excelsior!"

EAS Excelsior Size Feedback

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #96 on:** March 27, 2005, 06:01:57 pm »

Quote from: Captain Spadaro on March 27, 2005, 01:47:07 pm

"Hash it out"? What in the name of James T. Kirk does that mean? I would like to see the plaque, though. BTW, what is your avatar a pic of?

First, this is "hashing it out":

Think of "hashing it out" as digging through old stuff and pulling it back out into the world from boxes in the basement or what not. As you can see, the starfleet emblem wasn't done well, but it came from a friend I hadn't heard from in years.

And my avatar is Yattaro from a manga adaptation of the 1990 Japanese show called "Kyatto Ninden Teyande".

Dawntreader · « **Reply #97 on:** March 27, 2005, 06:46:37 pm »

Can I have the USS Odyssey?

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #98 on:** March 27, 2005, 07:18:33 pm »

The name/registry number tags I have come from the original BC model that was made by Scotchy when he released it. Just FYI.

News:

Topic: SNSGALAXY is done (Read 11447 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Topic: SNSGALAXY is done (Read 11447 times)