Taldrenites > Starfleet Command Enhancements and Materials
OP+ 4.0 Corrections Thread
FireSoul:
--- Quote from: FPF-DieHard on January 11, 2005, 09:07:33 am ---The I-NCA and I-NCS only have 24 warp. I'm at work and can't check my books, is this right?
--- End quote ---
Yes. This is right. The idea here is that once the Andromedan invasion took place, many of the ISC fleets out-and-about the galaxy were found stranded behind the lines, but in control of some limited shipyards. They decided it was easier to hold their ground than to try to make it home, so they design a quick upgrade with their limited ressources for their CLs.
.. in effect, they add a pod that doesn't have warp, but much APR, as well as a good number of weapons. The ship counts as a NCA but really can only go speed 25 max. HOWEVER, they have a decent amount of firepower.
FireSoul:
--- Quote from: Bearslayer on January 11, 2005, 05:40:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: FireSoul on January 11, 2005, 09:42:27 am ---
--- Quote from: Bearslayer on January 10, 2005, 11:23:47 pm ---
--- Quote from: Bearslayer on January 09, 2005, 11:06:32 pm ---FS,
Can you check the model size of the Lyran DNW and IIRC, the Klink DNW... they seem awfully small.
--- End quote ---
Don't know if you noticed this one or not.
--- End quote ---
Well, in my opinion yes these are right. I was careful not to create models much bigger than the LCW or the KCL (D5) since those are what these ships are created from. Do you prefer them to be enlarged?
--- End quote ---
I'd prefer they were as they are supposed to be.
I just asked since I did not know.
If they are supposed to appear that small, that is fine... I just need to pay attention and not think it is a regular ship. ;D
--- End quote ---
*nod* .. they are in effect War Dreadnoughts, and thus can be misleading in their abilities.
Corbomite:
The ISC DW is using the Frigate UI and the DD model (no models).
And why use the X Ship UI for the DNW and DNM when the BB UI will work fine?
For the DNW just set it up like the DNT with 2 PPD's in front and with the Plas S in the BB's rear PPD slots, the Plas D in the BB's Plas S slots, FAL and FAR PH-1's in the BB's 2 FH slots, FH PH-1's in the BB's 360 slot, LS and RS PH-3's in the BB's FAL and FAR PH-1 slots and LLR and RRR PH-3's in the BB's LS and RS PH-3 slots.
The DNM is even easier - just put the Plas D in the BB's Plas S slots and add one PH-1 to the 360 mount. Now I know what you are going to say, but is it reallly worth dumping an entire UI and messing up TacIntel for 2 measly 360 PH-3's that combat-wise are marginally (at best) better than placing them all on the LS/RS mounts?
FireSoul:
--- Quote from: Corbomite on January 14, 2005, 06:37:05 am ---The ISC DW is using the Frigate UI and the DD model (no models).
--- End quote ---
That's fine.
--- Quote ---And why use the X Ship UI for the DNW and DNM when the BB UI will work fine?
For the DNW just set it up like the DNT with 2 PPD's in front and with the Plas S in the BB's rear PPD slots, the Plas D in the BB's Plas S slots, FAL and FAR PH-1's in the BB's 2 FH slots, FH PH-1's in the BB's 360 slot, LS and RS PH-3's in the BB's FAL and FAR PH-1 slots and LLR and RRR PH-3's in the BB's LS and RS PH-3 slots.
The DNM is even easier - just put the Plas D in the BB's Plas S slots and add one PH-1 to the 360 mount. Now I know what you are going to say, but is it reallly worth dumping an entire UI and messing up TacIntel for 2 measly 360 PH-3's that combat-wise are marginally (at best) better than placing them all on the LS/RS mounts?
--- End quote ---
I'll take these UI changes into consideration, but for the amount of work they require, what's the point? The ship is just as accurate.
Corbomite:
--- Quote from: FireSoul on January 14, 2005, 08:16:09 am ---
--- Quote from: Corbomite on January 14, 2005, 06:37:05 am ---The ISC DW is using the Frigate UI and the DD model (no models).
--- End quote ---
That's fine.
--- Quote ---And why use the X Ship UI for the DNW and DNM when the BB UI will work fine?
For the DNW just set it up like the DNT with 2 PPD's in front and with the Plas S in the BB's rear PPD slots, the Plas D in the BB's Plas S slots, FAL and FAR PH-1's in the BB's 2 FH slots, FH PH-1's in the BB's 360 slot, LS and RS PH-3's in the BB's FAL and FAR PH-1 slots and LLR and RRR PH-3's in the BB's LS and RS PH-3 slots.
The DNM is even easier - just put the Plas D in the BB's Plas S slots and add one PH-1 to the 360 mount. Now I know what you are going to say, but is it really worth dumping an entire UI and messing up TacIntel for 2 measly 360 PH-3's that combat-wise are marginally (at best) better than placing them all on the LS/RS mounts?
--- End quote ---
I'll take these UI changes into consideration, but for the amount of work they require, what's the point? The ship is just as accurate.
--- End quote ---
Yes, but they are a bit of an ergonomic nightmare.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version