Topic: OP+ 4.0 Corrections Thread

[Pestalence_XC]

Not your fault Chris.. I make errors like that often.. it happens when you are trying to get something like that out.. your error was the SFCMusic.txt file.. he is reporting the sounds.txt file.. your sounds.txt file has always worked correctly IIRC...

[FireSoul]

Lyran PFE is left in, Bobcat PF-P Leader version left out.
-dunno if it's worth putting in, but it's got to be a better escort then the PFE.

I don't think the PFpL exists. Where'd you see this?

EDIT: The 'E' in "PFE" is not for Escort. It's for ESG.

[FireSoul]

F-FLGR points to the fepol model folder, when it should point to the feff or fff folder (the FLG points to the feff folder and the FLG+ points to the fff folder).

Thanks. How did you catch this one, out of curiousity? You can't possibly be examining what each ship uses as model, are you?

[FPF-Wanderer]

Lyran PFE is left in, Bobcat PF-P Leader version left out.
-dunno if it's worth putting in, but it's got to be a better escort then the PFE.

I don't think the PFpL exists. Where'd you see this?

Module K, page 37...

(R11.PF3) BOBCAT-P (a.k.a. BOBTAIL) PF (BOB-P):  A Bobcat varient (Bobcat-P) replacing the disruptors with phasers.  This design was more efficient because the standard Bobcat could not adequestly power two disruptors.  Even so, the Bobtail lacked the punch of a disruptor and was effective primarily in an escort role.
SSD in Module K.  There was a leader version. (italics mine)

I almost missed it, and I was actively looking for it, so I wouldn't feel bad, FS.   Btw, the SSD for it is on page 55 of the Mod K SSD book.

[FPF-Wanderer]

F-FLGR points to the fepol model folder, when it should point to the feff or fff folder (the FLG points to the feff folder and the FLG+ points to the fff folder).

Thanks. How did you catch this one, out of curiousity? You can't possibly be examining what each ship uses as model, are you?

Ummm...<whistles tonelessly, looks at the ceiling>...lol

Actually, I wrote up a list of all the Fed model folders and what ships point to them, as a reference for those Feds that like to switch around their models a lot, like me. 

[FireSoul]

Lyran PFE is left in, Bobcat PF-P Leader version left out.
-dunno if it's worth putting in, but it's got to be a better escort then the PFE.

I don't think the PFpL exists. Where'd you see this?

Module K, page 37...

(R11.PF3) BOBCAT-P (a.k.a. BOBTAIL) PF (BOB-P):  A Bobcat varient (Bobcat-P) replacing the disruptors with phasers.  This design was more efficient because the standard Bobcat could not adequestly power two disruptors.  Even so, the Bobtail lacked the punch of a disruptor and was effective primarily in an escort role.
SSD in Module K.  There was a leader version. (italics mine)

I almost missed it, and I was actively looking for it, so I wouldn't feel bad, FS.   Btw, the SSD for it is on page 55 of the Mod K SSD book.

A PLpL eh? Interesting. Ok.

[Hexx]

Lyran PFE is left in, Bobcat PF-P Leader version left out.
-dunno if it's worth putting in, but it's got to be a better escort then the PFE.

I don't think the PFpL exists. Where'd you see this?

Module K, page 37...

(R11.PF3) BOBCAT-P (a.k.a. BOBTAIL) PF (BOB-P):  A Bobcat varient (Bobcat-P) replacing the disruptors with phasers.  This design was more efficient because the standard Bobcat could not adequestly power two disruptors.  Even so, the Bobtail lacked the punch of a disruptor and was effective primarily in an escort role.
SSD in Module K.  There was a leader version. (italics mine)

I almost missed it, and I was actively looking for it, so I wouldn't feel bad, FS.   Btw, the SSD for it is on page 55 of the Mod K SSD book.

See? I saw it right off cuz I was looking at the SSD sheets wondering how SFB could possibly do that to the Lyrans.
No worries about missing it, you can just name the next OP+ after me and we'll be even. 

[FireSoul]

Lyran PFE is left in, Bobcat PF-P Leader version left out.
-dunno if it's worth putting in, but it's got to be a better escort then the PFE.

I don't think the PFpL exists. Where'd you see this?

Module K, page 37...

(R11.PF3) BOBCAT-P (a.k.a. BOBTAIL) PF (BOB-P):  A Bobcat varient (Bobcat-P) replacing the disruptors with phasers.  This design was more efficient because the standard Bobcat could not adequestly power two disruptors.  Even so, the Bobtail lacked the punch of a disruptor and was effective primarily in an escort role.
SSD in Module K.  There was a leader version. (italics mine)

I almost missed it, and I was actively looking for it, so I wouldn't feel bad, FS.   Btw, the SSD for it is on page 55 of the Mod K SSD book.

See? I saw it right off cuz I was looking at the SSD sheets wondering how SFB could possibly do that to the Lyrans.
No worries about missing it, you can just name the next OP+ after me and we'll be even. 

... version 5.8?? No way!
 

[Corbomite]

The new Romulan tugs seem awfully fast (1 move cost) and have a 100% HET rating. They are also all pointing to the Kestral model and using Firehawk UI and firing arcs. Is this right?

[FireSoul]

The new Romulan tugs seem awfully fast (1 move cost) and have a 100% HET rating. They are also all pointing to the Kestral model and using Firehawk UI and firing arcs. Is this right?

About HET: actually.. yeah. The FireHawks with pods could still HET apparently. I haven't seen any data otherwise so I couldn't assume it's any different. After all, some romulan DNs can HET at 100% too.

The models version is correct. Are you pointing out a no-models version?

[Corbomite]

Yeah, no models. Those Tugs with a one move cost and 100% HET give the Roms two more BCH's!

[Kroma BaSyl]

Yeah, no models. Those Tugs with a one move cost and 100% HET give the Roms two more BCH's!

Just what they needed. LOL

[Corbomite]

Yeah, no models. Those Tugs with a one move cost and 100% HET give the Roms two more BCH's!

Just what they needed. LOL

Have you seen the Battleship Mauler for the Klings?

[Capt_Bearslayer_XC]

FS,

Can you check the model size of the Lyran DNW and IIRC, the Klink DNW... they seem awfully small.

[Keravnos]

It has been forever since I last checked Firesouls' finest work...

sadly no OP yet...

However, as I was playing the Hydrans, I found that their fighters were TOO BIG for the ships they launched from, and they were UGLEEE.

( I don't know whether this has been adressed, however, boot eating has to come second to adressing some issues)

Should the size be fixed already (please fix it if not) then, how about these spider Murphy pretties for the position?

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163351037.0.html

Sorry, I posted this again on the 4.0 thread, but it is something of PARAMOUNT (no pun) importance to all of us Hydrans.

[Capt_Bearslayer_XC]

It has been forever since I last checked Firesouls' finest work...

sadly no OP yet...

However, as I was playing the Hydrans, I found that their fighters were TOO BIG for the ships they launched from, and they were UGLEEE.

( I don't know whether this has been adressed, however, boot eating has to come second to adressing some issues)

Should the size be fixed already (please fix it if not) then, how about these spider Murphy pretties for the position?

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163351037.0.html

Sorry, I posted this again on the 4.0 thread, but it is something of PARAMOUNT (no pun) importance to all of us Hydrans.

Gonna assume then that this Hydran will see you on SG4?

[FireSoul]

It has been forever since I last checked Firesouls' finest work...

sadly no OP yet...

However, as I was playing the Hydrans, I found that their fighters were TOO BIG for the ships they launched from, and they were UGLEEE.

( I don't know whether this has been adressed, however, boot eating has to come second to adressing some issues)

Should the size be fixed already (please fix it if not) then, how about these spider Murphy pretties for the position?

http://www.dynaverse.net/forum/index.php/topic,163351037.0.html

Sorry, I posted this again on the 4.0 thread, but it is something of PARAMOUNT (no pun) importance to all of us Hydrans.

The hydran fighter size?
.. it's normal .. I have *never* changed it.

[Klingon Fanatic]

  Not really a correction but Spyder Murphy's 2 HFTS are available here:

http://www.battleclinic.com/halo_skin/docks/dock.php?id=1364

IMHO they should be in the next OP+ mod.

Also for the PIRATE Cartels VARIETY is needed IMHO. Can the DIFFERENT Pirate Cartel models be listed something like PSLV1, PSLV2, etc. or KPSLV, BRPSLV, THPSLV, etc...so we can have MORE custom models to play with in game and still be online game compliant?

Respectfully,

KF

[FireSoul]

Not really a correction but Spyder Murphy's 2 HFTS are available here:

http://www.battleclinic.com/halo_skin/docks/dock.php?id=1364

IMHO they should be in the next OP+ mod.

Also for the PIRATE Cartels VARIETY is needed IMHO. Can the DIFFERENT Pirate Cartel models be listed something like PSLV1, PSLV2, etc. or KPSLV, BRPSLV, THPSLV, etc...so we can have MORE custom models to play with in game and still be online game compliant?

Respectfully,

KF

That gave me the BSG Viper Mark II...
.. eh.

[Klingon Fanatic]

Not really a correction but Spyder Murphy's 2 HFTS are available here:

http://www.battleclinic.com/halo_skin/docks/dock.php?id=1364

IMHO they should be in the next OP+ mod.

Also for the PIRATE Cartels VARIETY is needed IMHO. Can the DIFFERENT Pirate Cartel models be listed something like PSLV1, PSLV2, etc. or KPSLV, BRPSLV, THPSLV, etc...so we can have MORE custom models to play with in game and still be online game compliant?

Respectfully,

KF

That gave me the BSG Viper Mark II...
.. eh.

Sorry about that, in my excitement I copied the wrong link. Here's the corrected link: http://www.battleclinic.com/halo_skin/docks/dock.php?id=1366

KF